| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Johnny" |
| Date: |
28 Sep 2004 08:40:42 PM |
| Object: |
if you want to impregnate girls/women |
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
.
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
28 Sep 2004 09:48:33 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Let me guess -- that's the one thing you haven't done...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
28 Sep 2004 08:42:45 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:nvn6d.61684$as2.55538@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
I am here to saddle the men who get women pregnant with their created
burdens.
That would straighten the whole mess up.
I am not for the cast-off Chilton-esque false egalitarianism.
We need to stop the killing, and become more responsible people.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
28 Sep 2004 09:56:31 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:42:45 -0500,
Ignorant Hatemonger, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
I am not for the cast-off Chilton-esque false egalitarianism.
MORE of your lying DISHONESTY, huh, moronic LOON?
Look up the ANTONYMS for "egalitarian," and you'll find that
they all describe YOU very accurately.
<Hate-TRIPE flushed>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
29 Sep 2004 12:35:19 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
29 Sep 2004 10:29:41 AM |
|
|
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
You forgot how babies are made?
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
29 Sep 2004 06:53:00 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
You forgot how babies are made?
Did you ever know to begin with?
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
You're not getting any by pointing that out.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
29 Sep 2004 02:51:28 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
29 Sep 2004 04:12:16 PM |
|
|
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
If they do not want to impregnate anybody then they do not need the capacity
to impregnate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
29 Sep 2004 06:54:26 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
[...]
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why? No one's obliged to do as you say, now or ever.
If they do not want to impregnate anybody then they do not need the capacity
to impregnate.
Too bad you don't decide that for anyone, South Carolina Cuckoo.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
29 Sep 2004 08:44:23 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkacv8bphp.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
[...]
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why? No one's obliged to do as you say, now or ever.
Apply that to yourself.
If they do not want to impregnate anybody then they do not need the
capacity
to impregnate.
Too bad you don't decide that for anyone, South Carolina Cuckoo.
Apply your reasoning to Planned Parenthood.
Let me know when you stop crying.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
29 Sep 2004 09:42:02 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkacv8bphp.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
[...]
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why? No one's obliged to do as you say, now or ever.
Apply that to yourself.
Sorry, but I'll keep what I've got. No one has to do as you say, and you
can't stand for that. No one has to do as I say, either, and it doesn't
bother me.
If they do not want to impregnate anybody then they do not need the
capacity to impregnate.
Too bad you don't decide that for anyone, South Carolina Cuckoo.
Apply your reasoning to Planned Parenthood.
They don't decide that for anyone, either -- obviously you're too insane to
deal with the word "choice" and what it means.
Let me know when you stop crying.
Let me know when your head's reparied.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 08:15:25 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
I suppose it's possible that you never learned how to read.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
That would be the agenda if you had said "if you DON'T want to
impregnate", but you didn't.
If they do not want to impregnate anybody then they do not need the capacity
to impregnate.
See?... Your belated addition of "do not" completely changes the meaning
of your original post. Specifically, it turns it into a post that makes
sense.
And to the now modified original post, I'd agree. If a guy is sexually
active and is certain that he does not want children... ever... then he
should consider a vasectomy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 10:20:13 PM |
|
|
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:Nin7d.8091$ov5.2500@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
I suppose it's possible that you never learned how to read.
abcdefg
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
That would be the agenda if you had said "if you DON'T want to
impregnate", but you didn't.
Why are you changing what I posted?
If they do not want to impregnate anybody then they do not need the
capacity to impregnate.
See?... Your belated addition of "do not" completely changes the meaning
of your original post. Specifically, it turns it into a post that makes
sense.
You have difficulty with the tone of the post?
And to the now modified original post, I'd agree. If a guy is sexually
active and is certain that he does not want children... ever... then he
should consider a vasectomy.
What is the difference?
What is the end result if a guy impregnates a woman who has to abort the
pregnancy?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
30 Sep 2004 04:52:25 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 AM |
|
|
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
You so sure they want children in the future?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
30 Sep 2004 08:22:39 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby, then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 05:44:46 AM |
|
|
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Abortion kills children.
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future because they abort
that which would be their future child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 08:20:50 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Let them? You think you could stop them?
Abortion kills children.
Semantics kills intelligent discussion.
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
Your original post wasn't addressing abortion, what makes you think you
are now?
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future because they abort
that which would be their future child.
They don't need to prove anything to anyone. If they say (to anyone or
no one) that they might want a kid at a later time in life, then that's
the end of it right there.
You have absolutely NO SAY in the matter... EVER.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 10:17:01 PM |
|
|
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:Snn7d.8092$nJ5.4357@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Let them? You think you could stop them?
We could make them stop aborting and becoming whores and gamers and unstable
pleasure house fools.
Abortion kills children.
Semantics kills intelligent discussion.
How many dead babies in your closet?
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
Your original post wasn't addressing abortion, what makes you think you
are now?
It is related.
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future because they
abort that which would be their future child.
They don't need to prove anything to anyone.
Why am I asked for proof then?
If they say (to anyone or no one) that they might want a kid at a later
time in life, then that's the end of it right there.
You have absolutely NO SAY in the matter... EVER.
I am saying what I want to say now and I will continue to say it and that
could be forever.
What re you going to do about that?
The First Amendment grants me the RIGHT to say whatever I want in this area.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 05:57:25 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Abortion kills children.
Fetuses aren't children.
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
When a Pro-Lifer introduces "adoption" as an 'alternative' to
abortion, you don't disregard their comments -- but when I bring it up
as an alternative to physically enduring pregnancy, it's not 'staying
on topic.'
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future...
You don't know.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 07:08:09 AM |
|
|
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:gcdql0l1fuoejutono05gu8r4d4cee32ua@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Yes. If they do not want children now, then why should they assume the risk
of producing something they do not want?
Abortion kills children.
Fetuses aren't children.
What are they then?
Tell me what they are then.
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
When a Pro-Lifer introduces "adoption" as an 'alternative' to
abortion, you don't disregard their comments -- but when I bring it up
as an alternative to physically enduring pregnancy, it's not 'staying
on topic.'
Abortion is the topic here.
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future...
You don't know.
I know.
They do not want children in the future because they have them aborted
before they are born.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 08:25:48 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:gcdql0l1fuoejutono05gu8r4d4cee32ua@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Yes. If they do not want children now, then why should they assume the risk
of producing something they do not want?
Because they're adults, and adults are free to assume any risk they wish.
There's another absolute that you can never change.
Abortion kills children.
Fetuses aren't children.
What are they then?
Tell me what they are then.
They're called fetuses. Did you miss it the first time?
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
When a Pro-Lifer introduces "adoption" as an 'alternative' to
abortion, you don't disregard their comments -- but when I bring it up
as an alternative to physically enduring pregnancy, it's not 'staying
on topic.'
Abortion is the topic here.
Then why did you start a thread that had nothing to do with that topic?
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future...
You don't know.
I know.
They do not want children in the future because they have them aborted
before they are born.
"in the future".
Even in your insanity, you are still able to realize that the future is
an unknown, right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 10:14:07 PM |
|
|
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:wsn7d.8093$Ey5.6639@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:gcdql0l1fuoejutono05gu8r4d4cee32ua@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Yes. If they do not want children now, then why should they assume the
risk of producing something they do not want?
Because they're adults, and adults are free to assume any risk they wish.
Since 1973?
The risk was much greater before 1973.
There's another absolute that you can never change.
Roe v Wade can be overturned.
Abortion kills children.
Fetuses aren't children.
What are they then?
Tell me what they are then.
They're called fetuses. Did you miss it the first time?
Fetuses?
Non-human?
Non-existent?
So, kill them?
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions
via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
When a Pro-Lifer introduces "adoption" as an 'alternative' to
abortion, you don't disregard their comments -- but when I bring it up
as an alternative to physically enduring pregnancy, it's not 'staying
on topic.'
Abortion is the topic here.
Then why did you start a thread that had nothing to do with that topic?
To irk you?
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future...
You don't know.
I know.
They do not want children in the future because they have them aborted
before they are born.
"in the future".
Even in your insanity, you are still able to realize that the future is an
unknown, right?
Unknown?
LOL!!!!!!!!
That is a no brainer the way they run this shithole of a nation now.
UNKNOWN!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 07:43:16 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:08:09 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:gcdql0l1fuoejutono05gu8r4d4cee32ua@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Yes. If they do not want children now, then why should they assume the risk
of producing something they do not want?
So I should stop having sex with my husband for enjoyment just because
we don't want to procreate?
Abortion kills children.
Fetuses aren't children.
What are they then?
Tell me what they are then.
Fetuses.
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
When a Pro-Lifer introduces "adoption" as an 'alternative' to
abortion, you don't disregard their comments -- but when I bring it up
as an alternative to physically enduring pregnancy, it's not 'staying
on topic.'
Abortion is the topic here.
Let me see you say that when a fellow Pro-Lifer mentions adoption as
an alternative to abortion.
Abortion hasn't anything to do with killing children. Period.
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future...
You don't know.
I know.
As I have mentioned earlier, you are not omninescent.
They do not want children in the future because they have them aborted
before they are born.
How can you abort something that doesn't exist, other than a thought?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 09:26:04 AM |
|
|
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:82kql09mijoipsqioc7lg09jfgtat90k3b@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:08:09 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:gcdql0l1fuoejutono05gu8r4d4cee32ua@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a
baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Yes. If they do not want children now, then why should they assume the
risk
of producing something they do not want?
So I should stop having sex with my husband for enjoyment just because
we don't want to procreate?
If you use surgical abortion as a method of birth control, then you should
rethink your position.
Abortion kills children.
Fetuses aren't children.
What are they then?
Tell me what they are then.
Fetuses.
What type of fetus is it?
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions
via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
When a Pro-Lifer introduces "adoption" as an 'alternative' to
abortion, you don't disregard their comments -- but when I bring it up
as an alternative to physically enduring pregnancy, it's not 'staying
on topic.'
Abortion is the topic here.
Let me see you say that when a fellow Pro-Lifer mentions adoption as
an alternative to abortion.
Why?
When?
You want an invitation?
Abortion hasn't anything to do with killing children. Period.
*****!
Stop lying.
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future...
You don't know.
I know.
As I have mentioned earlier, you are not omninescent.
But, I know.
They do not want children in the future because they have them aborted
before they are born.
How can you abort something that doesn't exist, other than a thought?
Why do they obtain abortions then?
Why does it require a procedure called abortion if it is only a thought?
.
|
|
|
| User: "somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 08:34:55 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:26:04 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:82kql09mijoipsqioc7lg09jfgtat90k3b@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:08:09 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:gcdql0l1fuoejutono05gu8r4d4cee32ua@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a
baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Yes. If they do not want children now, then why should they assume the
risk
of producing something they do not want?
So I should stop having sex with my husband for enjoyment just because
we don't want to procreate?
If you use surgical abortion as a method of birth control, then you should
rethink your position.
I don't get pregnant with every instance of sex I have with my spouse,
you dolt.
Abortion kills children.
Fetuses aren't children.
What are they then?
Tell me what they are then.
Fetuses.
What type of fetus is it?
A fetus that is human (but not yet a HUMAN being).
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions
via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
When a Pro-Lifer introduces "adoption" as an 'alternative' to
abortion, you don't disregard their comments -- but when I bring it up
as an alternative to physically enduring pregnancy, it's not 'staying
on topic.'
Abortion is the topic here.
Let me see you say that when a fellow Pro-Lifer mentions adoption as
an alternative to abortion.
Why?
Hypocrite.
When?
You want an invitation?
Abortion hasn't anything to do with killing children. Period.
*****!
Stop lying.
I am not. Why don't YOU stop lying by saying that it is!
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future...
You don't know.
I know.
As I have mentioned earlier, you are not omninescent.
But, I know.
But, you don't.
They do not want children in the future because they have them aborted
before they are born.
How can you abort something that doesn't exist, other than a thought?
Why do they obtain abortions then?
NONE_Of_YOUR_FUCKING_BUSINESS.
Understand?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
01 Oct 2004 11:29:47 AM |
|
|
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:e3nql0pv00l17lv5kr2supb4osnfjcbv6g@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:26:04 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:82kql09mijoipsqioc7lg09jfgtat90k3b@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:08:09 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:gcdql0l1fuoejutono05gu8r4d4cee32ua@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex
with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a
baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Yes. If they do not want children now, then why should they assume the
risk
of producing something they do not want?
So I should stop having sex with my husband for enjoyment just because
we don't want to procreate?
If you use surgical abortion as a method of birth control, then you should
rethink your position.
I don't get pregnant with every instance of sex I have with my spouse,
you dolt.
Who cares?
If you are for having your own childfen killed via surgical abortion you are
off in your skull.
Abortion kills children.
Fetuses aren't children.
What are they then?
Tell me what they are then.
Fetuses.
What type of fetus is it?
A fetus that is human (but not yet a HUMAN being).
It does not have being?
It does not exist?
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions
via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
When a Pro-Lifer introduces "adoption" as an 'alternative' to
abortion, you don't disregard their comments -- but when I bring it up
as an alternative to physically enduring pregnancy, it's not 'staying
on topic.'
Abortion is the topic here.
Let me see you say that when a fellow Pro-Lifer mentions adoption as
an alternative to abortion.
Why?
Hypocrite.
You?
When?
You want an invitation?
Abortion hasn't anything to do with killing children. Period.
*****!
Stop lying.
I am not. Why don't YOU stop lying by saying that it is!
It does.
If you had an abortion before, I am sure you want to belive that no child
was killed.
But, that is not acceptable.
Until you admit that abortion does kill children, you will not be able to
make adequate policy in this area.
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future...
You don't know.
I know.
As I have mentioned earlier, you are not omninescent.
But, I know.
But, you don't.
But, I do know.
They do not want children in the future because they have them aborted
before they are born.
How can you abort something that doesn't exist, other than a thought?
Why do they obtain abortions then?
NONE_Of_YOUR_FUCKING_BUSINESS.
Oh, shcuks. Another one flies off the handle.
I know how they do it.
That is why I say I know.
It is published and promoted so much here, almost everyone knows what it is
if you ask them.
Understand?
Yes. I understand.
Why are you disturbed?
.
|
|
|
| User: "somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
02 Oct 2004 03:36:43 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:29:47 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:e3nql0pv00l17lv5kr2supb4osnfjcbv6g@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:26:04 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:82kql09mijoipsqioc7lg09jfgtat90k3b@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:08:09 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:gcdql0l1fuoejutono05gu8r4d4cee32ua@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex
with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a
baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Yes. If they do not want children now, then why should they assume the
risk
of producing something they do not want?
So I should stop having sex with my husband for enjoyment just because
we don't want to procreate?
If you use surgical abortion as a method of birth control, then you should
rethink your position.
I don't get pregnant with every instance of sex I have with my spouse,
you dolt.
Who cares?
Evidently you do.
If you are for having your own childfen killed via surgical abortion you are
off in your skull.
Huh? Both of the children I ever had are still alive. WHy would I want
to murder them?
Abortion kills children.
Fetuses aren't children.
What are they then?
Tell me what they are then.
Fetuses.
What type of fetus is it?
A fetus that is human (but not yet a HUMAN being).
It does not have being?
It does not exist?
It does not have the societal status of "human being."
What a ridiculous thing to assume about someone who is for abortions
via
Pro-Choice.
The future is nine months away after impregnating a woman.
The future could be immediate if he chose to adopt his wife's child.
We are discussing abortion, right?
When a Pro-Lifer introduces "adoption" as an 'alternative' to
abortion, you don't disregard their comments -- but when I bring it up
as an alternative to physically enduring pregnancy, it's not 'staying
on topic.'
Abortion is the topic here.
Let me see you say that when a fellow Pro-Lifer mentions adoption as
an alternative to abortion.
Why?
Hypocrite.
You?
You.
When?
You want an invitation?
Abortion hasn't anything to do with killing children. Period.
*****!
Stop lying.
I am not. Why don't YOU stop lying by saying that it is!
It does.
Nope.
If you had an abortion before, I am sure you want to belive that no child
was killed.
But, that is not acceptable.
Until you admit that abortion does kill children...
How can I admit to something that isn't true?
You so sure they want children in the future?
It's possible. Who are you to judge, either way? You're not
omniscient.
They do not prove that they want children in the future...
You don't know.
I know.
As I have mentioned earlier, you are not omninescent.
But, I know.
But, you don't.
But, I do know.
But, you don't.
They do not want children in the future because they have them aborted
before they are born.
How can you abort something that doesn't exist, other than a thought?
Why do they obtain abortions then?
NONE_Of_YOUR_FUCKING_BUSINESS.
Oh, shcuks.
Yes. Oh "shicks," drunkard.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: if you want to impregnate girls/women |
02 Oct 2004 08:05:58 AM |
|
|
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:p0qsl051tr9shs43tshoaanceed10muaeh@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:29:47 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:e3nql0pv00l17lv5kr2supb4osnfjcbv6g@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:26:04 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:82kql09mijoipsqioc7lg09jfgtat90k3b@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:08:09 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:gcdql0l1fuoejutono05gu8r4d4cee32ua@4ax.com...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:44:46 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:v4cpl0pqd37f9usdsgjj2jcj5usgm4muq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:15 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:fmlnl0loqnd7slhp24mt3fl839s0k06a6b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:12:16 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:4nE6d.7767$Z34.5955@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in message
news:rQr6d.7703$FF3.5192@news02.roc.ny...
Johnny wrote:
and do not want a baby, then get a vasectomy.
Most aren't looking to impregnate girls/women, only have sex
with
them.
You forgot how babies are made?
You forgot how to read?
You forgot sex ed?
There's a risk of pregnancy (amongst STD's, and what-not).
A risk doesn't mean a definate in every situation.
Also, men do look for women to have children with.
Read your post nice and slow, wingnut. "If you want to
impregnate...and
don't want a baby..."
Notice how ridiculous that statement is? If they don't want a
baby,
then
they obviously aren't looking to impregnate anybody.
So, fulfill the agenda and get sterilized.
Why?They may want children in the future?
But not if they get someone pregnant?
LOL!!!!!!
That doesn't mean they want children.
So, why let them perform sex too early if they do not want children?
Too early?
Yes. If they do not want children now, then why should they assume the
risk
of producing something they do not want?
So I should stop having sex with my husband for enjoyment just because
we don't want to procreate?
If you use surgical abortion as a method of birth control, then you
should
rethink your position.
I don't get pregnant with every instance of sex I have with my spouse,
you dolt.
Who cares?
Evidently you do.
If you are for having your own childfen killed via surgical abortion you
are
off in your skull.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
