| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Borked Pseudo Mailed" |
| Date: |
08 Dec 2005 02:51:40 AM |
| Object: |
Is the bible anti-woman? |
Subject: Could it be true, why yes, it's in the bible, look for
yourself.
Despite apologists attempts to "white-wash" the bible with a
litany of
excuses, it does not change the fact that the bible is anti
women.
I urge you not to take my word for it but to check it out
yourself. Here are
some more biblical "gems" to look up:
GENESIS
2:22 Eve created from Adam's rib.
3:16 Cursed with painful childbirth and domination by husband.
4:17 Cain marries sister?
4:19 Man marries two wives.
12:13-19 Abraham prostitutes wife.
19:1-8 Rape virgin daughters instead of male angels.
19:26 Lot's wife turned into pillar of salt for disobeying god.
19:30-38 Lot impregnates his two daughters while drunk. (So much
for "family
values"!)
20:2-12 Abraham prostitutes wife - again.
25:1-6 Keeping many concubines is OK.
EXODUS
20:17 Wife as property.
21:4 Wife and children belong to master.
21:7-11 OK to sell daughters. Female slaves can be used for sex.
Polygamy permitted. Unwanted female slaves can be set "free"
without payment
of money.
22:18 Kill witches.
LEVITICUS
12:1 Childbirth a sin, Women unclean after childbirth.
15:19-32 Menstruating women are unclean.
20:10-16 Death penalty for homosexuality and various sexual
transgressions.
21:7 Priests must not marry prostitutes or divorcees.
21:9 Burn daughters.
21:13-14 Priest must marry virgin, not "used" woman.
NUMBERS
1:2 Census lists only men - women do not count.
5:11-31 Fidelity test for women only.
30:1-16 Woman's vow invalid unless approved by her father or
husband.
31:17-18 Kill all except virgins. Keep virgins for yourselves.
CH 12 Miriam punished for rebuking Moses.
DEUTERONOMY
20:14 Take women, livestock as plunder.
22:13-21 Stone non-virgin bride.
22:23-24 Stone rapist and rape victim.
22:28 Rape victim must marry rapist; rape victim's father
compensated for
depreciation of his property.
25:11-12 Cut woman's hand for touching foe's penis.
24:1-5 Man can "send" wife from HIS house. Man must not marry
"used" woman.
28:18 The FRUIT of your womb will be cursed - eclectic "pro-
life" verse!
JUDGES
5:30 Women are spoils of war.
14:20 Samson gives wife to another man.
16:1 Samson visits prostitute.
CH 19 Concubine pack-raped and butchered.
21:10-12 Slaughtered all inc. women and children. Saved virgins
for wives.
21:21 Abducted girls for wives.
RUTH
Ruth shags Boaz.
1 SAMUEL
15:2-3 Attack Amalekites, kill men, women, children and
livestock.
22:19 Kill all inc. infants and livestock.
21:4-5 Men avoid defilement with women.
2 SAMUEL
5:13 David took many wives and concubines.
CH 13 Ammon rapes his own sister.
16:21-22 Absalom sleeps with his father's concubines.
6:20-23 Mischal punished with bareness.
1 KINGS
11:3 Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.
2 KINGS
9:30-37 Brutal murder of Jezebel.
2 CHRONICLES
15:13 Put to death unbelievers.
11:21 Hoards of wives and concubines.
ESTHER
CH 1-2 Queen Vashti dethroned for disobedience; setting "bad"
example to all
other women.
PSALMS
51:5 Sinful since conception.
127:3 Sons are heritage from god.
137:9 Seizes infants and dashes them against rocks.
PROVERBS
CH 5 Beware of wicked women!
CH 7 More of the above.
6:24 As above.
31:3 Do not waste strength on women.
ISAIAH
3:16-26 Lord punishes haughty women.
4:4 Filthy women.
13:16 Ravish wives, dash infants.
19:16 Will be like women! (insult to Egyptians)
EZEKIEL
9:6-7 Slaughter all including children.
CH 16 Prostitutes, stoning, promiscuity...
CH 23 Tale of two adulterous sisters - reads like the script of a
pornographic film. I bet you weren't told this story at Sunday
school!
HOSEA
13:16 Rip pregnant women, dash little ones. (Another "pro-life"
verse!)
NAHUM
3:4... wanton lust of a harlot... prostitution... witchcraft.
3:5 I will lift your skirts over your face!
3:13... Your troops are all women. (insult to Nineveh)
MATTHEW
5:32Husband can divorce wife for adultery. Can wife divorce
husband for the
same?
CH 25 Sexist tale of ten virgins.
LUKE
2:22 Mary must be purified after birth of Jesus.
2:49 Jesus rebukes his mother.
I CORINTHIANS
11:2-10... Woman created for man.
14:34 Women must be silent in churches.
EPHESIANS
5:22-24 Wives must submit to husbands in everything.
COLOSSIANS
3:18 Wives submit to husbands.
3:22 Slaves must obey masters in everything.
I TIMOTHY
2:11-15 Woman must not have authority…she must be silent. Women
can be saved
with childbearing.
5:9-10 Widows should be faithful to husband and must wash
saints' feet.
1 PETER
2:18 Slaves submit to masters, even masters who are harsh.
3:1 Wives submit.
3:5-6 Sarah calls husband master.
REVELATION
CH 17 Destroy great prostitute.
14:4...they did not DEFILE themselves with women but kept
themselves pure.
NOTMAN, PEACE :)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
----
Follow Ups:
hey NOT MAN Bradlin Posted at: 03/22/03 (0)
Re: could it be true, why yes its in the bible, look for
yourself. hal
Posted at: 03/17/03 (0)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
----
Post a Followup
Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Message to Post
:
: Despite apologists attempts to "white-wash" the bible with a
litany of
excuses, it does not change the fact that the bible is anti
women.
: I urge you not to take my word for it but to check it out
yourself. Here
are some more biblical "gems" to look up:
: GENESIS
: 2:22 Eve created from Adam's rib.
: 3:16 Cursed with painful childbirth and domination by husband.
: 4:17 Cain marries sister?
: 4:19 Man marries two wives.
: 12:13-19 Abraham prostitutes wife.
: 19:1-8 Rape virgin daughters instead of male angels.
: 19:26 Lot's wife turned into pillar of salt for disobeying god.
: 19:30-38 Lot impregnates his two daughters while drunk. (So
much for
"family values"!)
: 20:2-12 Abraham prostitutes wife - again.
: 25:1-6 Keeping many concubines is OK.
:
: EXODUS
: 20:17 Wife as property.
: 21:4 Wife and children belong to master.
: 21:7-11 OK to sell daughters. Female slaves can be used for
sex.
: Polygamy permitted. Unwanted female slaves can be set "free"
without
payment of money.
: 22:18 Kill witches.
:
: LEVITICUS
: 12:1 Childbirth a sin, Women unclean after childbirth.
: 15:19-32 Menstruating women are unclean.
: 20:10-16 Death penalty for homosexuality and various sexual
transgressions.
: 21:7 Priests must not marry prostitutes or divorcees.
: 21:9 Burn daughters.
: 21:13-14 Priest must marry virgin, not "used" woman.
:
: NUMBERS
: 1:2 Census lists only men - women do not count.
: 5:11-31 Fidelity test for women only.
: 30:1-16 Woman's vow invalid unless approved by her father or
husband.
: 31:17-18 Kill all except virgins. Keep virgins for yourselves.
: CH 12 Miriam punished for rebuking Moses.
:
: DEUTERONOMY
: 20:14 Take women, livestock as plunder.
: 22:13-21 Stone non-virgin bride.
: 22:23-24 Stone rapist and rape victim.
: 22:28 Rape victim must marry rapist; rape victim's father
compensated for
depreciation of his property.
: 25:11-12 Cut woman's hand for touching foe's penis.
: 24:1-5 Man can "send" wife from HIS house. Man must not marry
"used"
woman.
: 28:18 The FRUIT of your womb will be cursed - eclectic "pro-
life" verse!
:
: JUDGES
: 5:30 Women are spoils of war.
: 14:20 Samson gives wife to another man.
: 16:1 Samson visits prostitute.
: CH 19 Concubine pack-raped and butchered.
: 21:10-12 Slaughtered all inc. women and children. Saved
virgins for wives.
: 21:21 Abducted girls for wives.
:
: RUTH
: Ruth shags Boaz.
: 1 SAMUEL
: 15:2-3 Attack Amalekites, kill men, women, children and
livestock.
: 22:19 Kill all inc. infants and livestock.
: 21:4-5 Men avoid defilement with women.
:
: 2 SAMUEL
: 5:13 David took many wives and concubines.
: CH 13 Ammon rapes his own sister.
: 16:21-22 Absalom sleeps with his father's concubines.
: 6:20-23 Mischal punished with bareness.
:
: 1 KINGS
: 11:3 Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.
:
: 2 KINGS
: 9:30-37 Brutal murder of Jezebel.
:
: 2 CHRONICLES
: 15:13 Put to death unbelievers.
: 11:21 Hoards of wives and concubines.
:
: ESTHER
: CH 1-2 Queen Vashti dethroned for disobedience; setting "bad"
example to
all other women.
:
: PSALMS
: 51:5 Sinful since conception.
: 127:3 Sons are heritage from god.
: 137:9 Seizes infants and dashes them against rocks.
:
: PROVERBS
: CH 5 Beware of wicked women!
: CH 7 More of the above.
: 6:24 As above.
: 31:3 Do not waste strength on women.
:
: ISAIAH
: 3:16-26 Lord punishes haughty women.
: 4:4 Filthy women.
: 13:16 Ravish wives, dash infants.
: 19:16 Will be like women! (insult to Egyptians)
:
: EZEKIEL
: 9:6-7 Slaughter all including children.
: CH 16 Prostitutes, stoning, promiscuity...
: CH 23 Tale of two adulterous sisters - reads like the script
of a
pornographic film. I bet you weren't told this story at Sunday
school!
:
: HOSEA
: 13:16 Rip pregnant women, dash little ones. (Another "pro-
life" verse!)
:
: NAHUM
: 3:4... wanton lust of a harlot... prostitution... witchcraft.
: 3:5 I will lift your skirts over your face!
: 3:13... Your troops are all women. (insult to Nineveh)
:
: MATTHEW
: 5:32Husband can divorce wife for adultery. Can wife divorce
husband for
the same?
: CH 25 Sexist tale of ten virgins.
:
: LUKE
: 2:22 Mary must be purified after birth of Jesus.
: 2:49 Jesus rebukes his mother.
:
: I CORINTHIANS
: 11:2-10... Woman created for man.
: 14:34 Women must be silent in churches.
:
: EPHESIANS
: 5:22-24 Wives must submit to husbands in everything.
:
: COLOSSIANS
: 3:18 Wives submit to husbands.
: 3:22 Slaves must obey masters in everything.
:
: I TIMOTHY
: 2:11-15 Woman must not have authority…she must be silent.
Women can be
saved with childbearing.
: 5:9-10 Widows should be faithful to husband and must wash
saints' feet.
:
: 1 PETER
: 2:18 Slaves submit to masters, even masters who are harsh.
: 3:1 Wives submit.
: 3:5-6 Sarah calls husband master.
:
: REVELATION
: CH 17 Destroy great prostitute.
: 14:4...they did not DEFILE themselves with women but kept
themselves pure.
:
: NOTME, PEACE :)
.
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
09 Dec 2005 01:11:35 AM |
|
|
Is a bull frog's ***** water tight?
--
Jack
bobo1148atxmissiondotcom
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
09 Dec 2005 05:14:29 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 01:51:40 -0700 (MST), Borked Pseudo Mailed
<nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
Subject: Could it be true, why yes, it's in the bible, look for
yourself.
Despite apologists attempts to "white-wash" the bible with a
litany of
excuses, it does not change the fact that the bible is anti
women.
1. The bible can't be anti-woman. It's a book.
2. Muslim women still wear a burkka in public.
3. Jesus was the first man to change that - he told man to honor the woman. And
the woman to be submissive to the man, as opposed to being taken.
In those days, women were chattel (property) until Jesus came along.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
09 Dec 2005 06:49:07 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:lm3kp1lq5c5fse897o1brfvvsubp2p01c9@4ax.com...
3. Jesus was the first man to change that - he told man to honor the
woman. And
the woman to be submissive to the man, as opposed to being taken.
=================
How is it to a woman's advantage to be "submissive" to the man? How do you
mean submissive?
CR.........
Libel, slander and defamation of character:
From: (JaBrIoL)gives a fine "witness."
Newsgroups: alt.religion.jehovahs-
witn,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,alt.feminism,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Was it God's Fault that carol allowed her son to
be sodomized from her second husband?
sure.. I know now you get ugly and nasty and I strike up the truth...
you are really mad that you have a ***** negro child, a dishonor to
the lithuanian community.
everyone know that you grandchild is a result of your son raping a
crack-*****..
me guess You are going to blem God for that one too.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 07:26:40 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:49:07 -0600, "Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
3. Jesus was the first man to change that - he told man to honor the
woman. And
the woman to be submissive to the man, as opposed to being taken.
=================
How is it to a woman's advantage to be "submissive" to the man? How do you
mean submissive?
In biblical times, a woman was property, to be used by her man as he saw fit.
It's still like that in the Muslim world, as you may notice on the tv today.
Jesus was the first man to call for equality, for man to honor a woman as equal
to himself, and for the woman to be loving rather than just something to be
used.
It's scriptural.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 10:57:52 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4nllp1puubo32hk9fq4se0ojsf3nkfvl0n@4ax.com...
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:49:07 -0600, "Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
3. Jesus was the first man to change that - he told man to honor the
woman. And
the woman to be submissive to the man, as opposed to being taken.
=================
How is it to a woman's advantage to be "submissive" to the man? How do
you
mean submissive?
In biblical times, a woman was property, to be used by her man as he saw
fit.
It's still like that in the Muslim world, as you may notice on the tv
today.
$$ But that's how your god had things arranged. Read the OT. Your god saw
nothing amiss with this type of abuse. We have better morals and values
today than this ancient Hebrew god and do not allow the abuse of woman
anymore. The Muslim god, like Jehovah, sees nothing wrong with the abuse of
women either........
Jesus was the first man to call for equality, for man to honor a woman as
equal
to himself,
$$ Why did it take a mere man, a human to do this and not god himself?
and for the woman to be loving rather than just something to be
used.
It's scriptural.
$$ What a misogynistic god this Jehovah was to see women as things to *use*
like a camel or a donkey. Think of the millions of women who suffered
because of him before Jesus came along, and the millions who still suffer
because of him, or other gods like him in some nations. Best to get rid of
these old gods.........
--
CR........
THE LIST OF AMAZING JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES' CLAIMS, BELIEFS & PREDICTIONS
Prepared by "PB" may be found at the following websites:-
http://www.freeminds.org/history/part1.htm
http://www1.tip.nl/~t661020/wtcitaten/part1.htm
http://www.concordance.com/watchtower.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<~~{@
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 12:28:33 PM |
|
|
Earl Webber is a misogynistic and hatred-filled moron. That's why he
was mass-plonked by a host of a.a. regulars:
http://tinyurl.com/9gycg
The fact is that he's clueless when it comes to understanding the
Bible, as his cowardice in a thread designed to discuss that very topic
proves beyond contention:
http://tinyurl.com/3z47u
The Bible abuses women from the very start, by evilly dumping the blame
for the mythical god's incompetence not on the mythical Adam, but on
the mythical Eve, and it wasn't enough just to blame her, but to
brutally punish her:
"Unto the woman [the god] said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and
thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy
desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee."
In other words she was condemned to pain and slavery. And the tyranny
didn't end there. The OT is a litany of savagery against women and
children, and as if that were not bad enough, Exodus and Leviticus make
it tragically clear how demeaned women are to be:
The wife of a slave is to be her master's possession (neither Jesus nor
anyone else in the Bible ever condemned slavery), as were her children.
A man can sell his daughter in servitude and she will become her
owner's possession forever.
If a woman gives birth to a boy, she is unclean for 7 days, but if she
gives birth to a girl, she's unclean for 33 days.
A menstruating woman is unclean. She must be confined and must not be
touched.
A woman is unclean after sex, a man is not, unless the woman is
menstruating, in which case he's dirty for a week.
A woman is unclean *after* menstruation for a week, as is everything
she touches.
If a guy has sex with a woman who is another man's possession, the the
*woman* shall be scourged. An example of this is when David imprisons
his *concubines* when Absalom rapes them.
A female prostitute shall be burned to death if she's the daughter of a
priest. A male prostitute is just fine.
You shall kill witches. Wizards are fine.
Male vows are worth about twice what female vows are.
Women (but not men) accused of adultery are required to drink dirty
water.
Women who are determined not to be virgins at marriage shall be stoned
to death. Male sluts are just fine.
A man can kick out his wife with a piece of paper and she must leave,
penniless and alone - the divorce is final.
A divorcee cannot remarry her ex.
According to Samuel, men who are holy stay away from women.
One of the Bible's heroes, Solomon, owned a thousand wives and
concubines, and thought a good idea to solve custody battles was to cut
children in half.
Proverbs advises men not to give their strength to women.
The reason the mythical Jesus had to be born of a virgin was in part to
keep up with other myths of the era, and also in part because women are
defiled by sex and the farcical birth needed to be "pure".
Jesus expresses contempt for his mother after he causes them stress by
disobediently hanging out in the synagogue at the age of 12, instead of
following his family home.
Jesus tells his mother "Woman, what have I to do with thee" in "John's"
gospel, and he says "woe onto pregnant and nursing women" in Matthew.
In his entire ministry, the inventors of Jesus never once had him speak
against the ownership of women, against women being second-class
citizens in church and elsewhere, and he never once spoke of equating
them with men. According to gospel myth, he told stories about, for
example, 10 virgins awaiting one bridegroom without giving any
indication whatsoever that he thought there was anything wrong with
that.
The Bible myth makes it repeatedly clear that the women were Jesus's
most faithful followers, perhaps even indicating he was married to at
least one of them, yet he never appears to them after his ridiculous
and farcical resurrection, nor trusts any of them to carry his word.
Paul was a misogynist who detested women, indiscriminately describing
them as lesbians and insisting that it's better for men to avoid any
intimacy with them (like any "lesbian" would want anything to do with a
sorry ***** like him anyway!).
Paul insisted that married people are too obsessed with worldly things,
and therefore, perhaps, not worthy of a god.
In other words, the Bible neither respects women nor holds to family
values.
And Earl Webber is a mindless knee-jerk. His cowardice in "debate" or
even discussion is legendary:
1. http://tinyurl.com/4dyok
2. http://tinyurl.com/664yu
3. http://tinyurl.com/apenc
He has over 16 documented lies:
http://tinyurl.com/5zlzx
http://tinyurl.com/ablwm
He regularly demands people open discussions on his god, and when they
do, he runs away. I personally had him run from the same topic over
120 times!
He dismally failed the simplest intelligence test imaginable:
http://tinyurl.com/7zm43
He has fifty questions he can't answer or daren't answer honestly:
http://tinyurl.com/ad89u
and another fifty more:
http://tinyurl.com/9ky7y
In short, he's a waste of a human being.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 01:26:45 PM |
|
|
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1134239313.304349.295470@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Earl Webber is a misogynistic and hatred-filled moron. That's why he
was mass-plonked by a host of a.a. regulars:
http://tinyurl.com/9gycg
The fact is that he's clueless when it comes to understanding the
Bible, as his cowardice in a thread designed to discuss that very topic
proves beyond contention:
http://tinyurl.com/3z47u
The Bible abuses women from the very start, by evilly dumping the blame
for the mythical god's incompetence not on the mythical Adam, but on
the mythical Eve, and it wasn't enough just to blame her, but to
brutally punish her:
"Unto the woman [the god] said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and
thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy
desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee."
## Disgusting isn't it? First this (mythical) god "sets them up for a fall"
and when they do fall he punishes them and all their innocent descendants.
What did these people need a Satan and demons for with a god like that?
In other words she was condemned to pain and slavery. And the tyranny
didn't end there. The OT is a litany of savagery against women and
children, and as if that were not bad enough, Exodus and Leviticus make
it tragically clear how demeaned women are to be:
## Yes, I know. Reading the bible made me an agnostic bordering on atheism.
The fundies see nothing wrong with this vile, spiteful, hateful, punishing,
cold-blooded misogynistic god.
The wife of a slave is to be her master's possession (neither Jesus nor
anyone else in the Bible ever condemned slavery), as were her children.
A man can sell his daughter in servitude and she will become her
owner's possession forever.
If a woman gives birth to a boy, she is unclean for 7 days, but if she
gives birth to a girl, she's unclean for 33 days.
## Yep,... doesn't it make you want to gag?
A menstruating woman is unclean. She must be confined and must not be
touched.
A woman is unclean after sex, a man is not, unless the woman is
menstruating, in which case he's dirty for a week.
## It never occurred to them to WASH themselves? One would be as "unclean"
as the other. :ž
A woman is unclean *after* menstruation for a week, as is everything
she touches.
If a guy has sex with a woman who is another man's possession, the the
*woman* shall be scourged. An example of this is when David imprisons
his *concubines* when Absalom rapes them.
## It's quite clear Jehovah despised women right from the start.
A female prostitute shall be burned to death if she's the daughter of a
priest. A male prostitute is just fine.
You shall kill witches. Wizards are fine.
Male vows are worth about twice what female vows are.
Women (but not men) accused of adultery are required to drink dirty
water.
Women who are determined not to be virgins at marriage shall be stoned
to death. Male sluts are just fine.
## I remember it well yet the fundies again, see nothing WRONG with these
absurdities and atrocities.
A man can kick out his wife with a piece of paper and she must leave,
penniless and alone - the divorce is final.
A divorcee cannot remarry her ex.
According to Samuel, men who are holy stay away from women.
## Well after reading the scripture they probably saw all women as useless,
worthless filthy whores.
One of the Bible's heroes, Solomon, owned a thousand wives and
concubines, and thought a good idea to solve custody battles was to cut
children in half.
Proverbs advises men not to give their strength to women.
The reason the mythical Jesus had to be born of a virgin was in part to
keep up with other myths of the era, and also in part because women are
defiled by sex and the farcical birth needed to be "pure".
## How about the 244,000 Jews that go to heaven (Rev) who must be UNDEFILED
by those filthy, nasty, breeder ***** women?
Jesus expresses contempt for his mother after he causes them stress by
disobediently hanging out in the synagogue at the age of 12, instead of
following his family home.
Jesus tells his mother "Woman, what have I to do with thee" in "John's"
gospel, and he says "woe onto pregnant and nursing women" in Matthew.
In his entire ministry, the inventors of Jesus never once had him speak
against the ownership of women, against women being second-class
citizens in church and elsewhere, and he never once spoke of equating
them with men. According to gospel myth, he told stories about, for
example, 10 virgins awaiting one bridegroom without giving any
indication whatsoever that he thought there was anything wrong with
that.
## I've wondered about that one myself.......
The Bible myth makes it repeatedly clear that the women were Jesus's
most faithful followers, perhaps even indicating he was married to at
least one of them, yet he never appears to them after his ridiculous
and farcical resurrection, nor trusts any of them to carry his word.
Paul was a misogynist who detested women, indiscriminately describing
them as lesbians and insisting that it's better for men to avoid any
intimacy with them (like any "lesbian" would want anything to do with a
sorry ***** like him anyway!).
## LOL!!!! :-D He was probably a gay misogynist, not that all gay men
hate women, as I know they don't.
Paul insisted that married people are too obsessed with worldly things,
and therefore, perhaps, not worthy of a god.
In other words, the Bible neither respects women nor holds to family
values.
And Earl Webber is a mindless knee-jerk. His cowardice in "debate" or
even discussion is legendary:
1. http://tinyurl.com/4dyok
2. http://tinyurl.com/664yu
3. http://tinyurl.com/apenc
He has over 16 documented lies:
http://tinyurl.com/5zlzx
http://tinyurl.com/ablwm
He regularly demands people open discussions on his god, and when they
do, he runs away. I personally had him run from the same topic over
120 times!
He dismally failed the simplest intelligence test imaginable:
http://tinyurl.com/7zm43
He has fifty questions he can't answer or daren't answer honestly:
http://tinyurl.com/ad89u
and another fifty more:
http://tinyurl.com/9ky7y
In short, he's a waste of a human being.
Budikka
CR.......
The JWs showed their true colors
here by posting people's personal information in hopes someone sicker than
there are "takes care of the problem" and silences the person. There is no
other reason to post personal information on Usenet.
See: (Message-ID: <928697419.540.40@news.remarQ.com>#1/1)
This JW posted his own personal information on the net and blamed Carol.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 01:08:51 PM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2005 10:28:33 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Earl Webber is a misogynistic and hatred-filled moron. That's why he
was mass-plonked by a host of a.a. regulars:
Oh, bud the dud, it's time for you to grow up.
The fact is that he's clueless when it comes to understanding the
Bible, as his cowardice in a thread designed to discuss that very topic
proves beyond contention:
You should try reading the bible for once. It's amazing what you don't know and
understand about it.
http://tinyurl.com/3z47u
The Bible abuses women from the very start,
The bible is a book, dud. It relates stories and revelations.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 02:09:34 PM |
|
|
X-No-Archive: Yes
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:aq9mp1lljfeqpigg09i6fsss6qvflofofk@4ax.com...
The bible is a book, dud. It relates stories and revelations.
====================
It also exposes this god so many Christians and Jews worship for what it
was, or is. And that's not a pretty picture......
--
CR.......
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson
=============================
http://www.jwfiles.com/index.htm
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 07:21:17 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:09:34 -0600, "Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
The bible is a book, dud. It relates stories and revelations.
It also exposes this god so many Christians and Jews worship for what it
was, or is. And that's not a pretty picture......
What's ugly about loving one another as God loves us? John 13:34.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 10:37:20 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:6s9op1546rrdaf45j311p2gho1nuud4apb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:09:34 -0600, "Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
The bible is a book, dud. It relates stories and revelations.
It also exposes this god so many Christians and Jews worship for what it
was, or is. And that's not a pretty picture......
What's ugly about loving one another as God loves us? John 13:34.
===============================
What's pretty about the atrocities this god perpetuated again us? I see you
avoid addressing those atrocities. It's a shame you never read the OT. You
need to read it some day. :-) Just think,... your god forbid homosexuality
by consenting adults, but it was quite OK to stone a young bride to death
because her husband suspected (no proof needed) she wasn't a virgin.
Kramer......
The Jehovah's Witnesses showed their true colors
here by posting people's personal information in hopes someone sicker than
they are "takes care of the problem" and silences the person. There is no
other reason to post personal information on Usenet.
See: (Message-ID: <928697419.540.40@news.remarQ.com>#1/1)
This JW posted his own personal information on the net and blamed Carol.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 03:56:32 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:37:20 -0600, "Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
What's ugly about loving one another as God loves us? John 13:34.
===============================
What's pretty about the atrocities this god perpetuated again us?
He didn't. Don't you get it yet. That's man and his sins making man say that.
In God's words, Love one another as I have loved you.
I see you
avoid addressing those atrocities. It's a shame you never read the OT.
God didn't do any of that. That's man trying to relate to those things as God's
leadership.
You
need to read it some day. :-) Just think,... your god forbid homosexuality
by consenting adults, but it was quite OK to stone a young bride to death
because her husband suspected (no proof needed) she wasn't a virgin.
Don't you get it yet. God didn't do those things. That's man saying he was
directed by God to do those things.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 05:55:37 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
"Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
You
need to read it some day. :-) Just think,... your god forbid homosexuality
by consenting adults, but it was quite OK to stone a young bride to death
because her husband suspected (no proof needed) she wasn't a virgin.
Don't you get it yet. God didn't do those things. That's man saying he was
directed by God to do those things.
Much as the pope says he speaks for God.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
12 Dec 2005 05:45:25 AM |
|
|
On 11 Dec 2005 15:55:37 -0800, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
"Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
You
need to read it some day. :-) Just think,... your god forbid homosexuality
by consenting adults, but it was quite OK to stone a young bride to death
because her husband suspected (no proof needed) she wasn't a virgin.
Don't you get it yet. God didn't do those things. That's man saying he was
directed by God to do those things.
Much as the pope says he speaks for God.
Except in this case God told him so. Mat 16.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
12 Dec 2005 11:35:08 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
On 11 Dec 2005 15:55:37 -0800, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
"Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
You need to read it some day. :-) Just think,... your god forbid
homosexuality by consenting adults, but it was quite OK to stone a young
bride to death because her husband suspected (no proof needed) she wasn't
a virgin.
Don't you get it yet. God didn't do those things. That's man saying he was
directed by God to do those things.
Much as the pope says he speaks for God.
Except in this case God told him so. Mat 16.
In other words, because you say so...no wonder 2/3 of the people on this
planet avoid your reasoning.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 12:30:02 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:09:34 -0600, "Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
The bible is a book, dud. It relates stories and revelations.
It also exposes this god so many Christians and Jews worship for what it
was, or is. And that's not a pretty picture......
What's ugly about loving one another as God loves us? John 13:34.
But you offer only hate.
1 John 4:20
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 03:57:04 PM |
|
|
On 11 Dec 2005 10:30:02 -0800, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
What's ugly about loving one another as God loves us? John 13:34.
But you offer only hate.
Where? I'm trying to help you.
1 John 4:20
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 05:56:33 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On 11 Dec 2005 10:30:02 -0800, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
What's ugly about loving one another as God loves us? John 13:34.
But you offer only hate.
Where? I'm trying to help you.
That was the excuse given by Torquemada as he tortured and burnt
people alive at the stake.
1 John 4:20
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
12 Dec 2005 05:46:04 AM |
|
|
On 11 Dec 2005 15:56:33 -0800, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On 11 Dec 2005 10:30:02 -0800, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
What's ugly about loving one another as God loves us? John 13:34.
But you offer only hate.
Where? I'm trying to help you.
That was the excuse given by Torquemada as he tortured and burnt
people alive at the stake.
Talk to torquie about it.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 07:26:35 PM |
|
|
You'll note that the cowardly *****, universally known as Puke, very
adroitly sidesteps the actual issues you raised and goes off on a
completely irrelevant tangent. That's his trademark. That's why it's
a complete waste of time trying to have any sort of exchange with him.
He'll run away like a scalded cat from the tough issues you've hit him
with and pretend he's answered them, all the while making assinine and
completely unsupported assertions.
That's why the cowardly, lying, hypocritical fraud has been hugely
plonked:
http://tinyurl.com/9gycg
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
12 Dec 2005 05:52:09 AM |
|
|
On 11 Dec 2005 17:26:35 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
You'll note that the cowardly *****, universally known as Puke, very
adroitly sidesteps the actual issues you raised and goes off on a
completely irrelevant tangent.
Hey, bud the dud, come back - why do you always run away from a discussion?
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 01:06:40 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:57:52 -0600, "Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
In biblical times, a woman was property, to be used by her man as he saw
fit.
It's still like that in the Muslim world, as you may notice on the tv
today.
$$ But that's how your god had things arranged. Read the OT.
Sorry. God doesn't and didn't arrange things that way. Mankind did.
Your god saw
nothing amiss with this type of abuse. We have better morals and values
today than this ancient Hebrew god and do not allow the abuse of woman
anymore. The Muslim god, like Jehovah, sees nothing wrong with the abuse of
women either........
Jesus is your best friend.
Jesus was the first man to call for equality, for man to honor a woman as
equal
to himself,
$$ Why did it take a mere man, a human to do this and not god himself?
God doesn't run our lives. We do.
and for the woman to be loving rather than just something to be
used.
It's scriptural.
$$ What a misogynistic god this Jehovah was to see women as things to *use*
like a camel or a donkey.
You don't understand. God has never run our lives. He calls us to do right
thru choice, but doesn't pull the strings.
Think of the millions of women who suffered
because of him before Jesus came along, and the millions who still suffer
because of him, or other gods like him in some nations. Best to get rid of
these old gods.........
There's only one God, and he's your best friend.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 02:19:29 PM |
|
|
X-No-Archive: Yes
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:hk9mp15gie2dvpaq53cojjagnvjcgt698m@4ax.com...
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:57:52 -0600, "Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
In biblical times, a woman was property, to be used by her man as he saw
fit.
It's still like that in the Muslim world, as you may notice on the tv
today.
$$ But that's how your god had things arranged. Read the OT.
Sorry. God doesn't and didn't arrange things that way. Mankind did.
$$ Uh, no. Read it again. God gave them LAWS to live by and never said a
word in the woman's, slaves or concubines defense. He forbid homosexuality
(for example) but allowed the capture, giving away like animals and the rape
of young virgins from other cities etc. Why forbid one thing and allow
other atrocities continue? I'll answer that - he didn't see them as
atrocities.
Your god saw
nothing amiss with this type of abuse. We have better morals and values
today than this ancient Hebrew god and do not allow the abuse of woman
anymore. The Muslim god, like Jehovah, sees nothing wrong with the abuse
of
women either........
Jesus is your best friend.
$$ He hasn't showed up yet...... everyone's been waiting 2000+ years
already.
Jesus was the first man to call for equality, for man to honor a woman
as
equal
to himself,
$$ Why did it take a mere man, a human to do this and not god himself?
God doesn't run our lives. We do.
$$ So we were supposed to DISOBEY him, not keep slaves, not stone non-virgin
brides to death as he commanded, not slaughter whole villages on his say-so
and live moral lives? Now THAT makes sense! :-) To obey this god would
get us either in prison or committed to a mental hospital for Homicidal
Maniacs.
and for the woman to be loving rather than just something to be
used.
It's scriptural.
$$ What a misogynistic god this Jehovah was to see women as things to
*use*
like a camel or a donkey.
You don't understand. God has never run our lives. He calls us to do
right
thru choice, but doesn't pull the strings.
$$ I see,....So we were supposed to *DISOBEY* him, not keep slaves, not
stone non-virgin brides to death as he commanded, not slaughter whole
villages on his say-so, not capture virgins and live moral lives? Now THAT
makes sense! :-) To obey this god would get us either in prison or
committed to a mental hospital for Homicidal Maniacs.
Think of the millions of women who suffered
because of him before Jesus came along, and the millions who still suffer
because of him, or other gods like him in some nations. Best to get rid
of
these old gods.........
There's only one God, and he's your best friend.
$$ He is? That's odd since no one but schizophrenics have seen or heard
from him in well over 2500 years...... when do you figure he'll show up at
my house for coffee and truffles?
CR..........
http://silentlambs.org
www.freeminds.org
http://dbhome.dk/carlo/ secret Elder's Manual
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Derek" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 07:45:47 PM |
|
|
"Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:439b2f2a$0$27883$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
X-No-Archive: Yes
$$ He is? That's odd since no one but schizophrenics have seen or heard
from him in well over 2500 years...... when do you figure he'll show up at
my house for coffee and truffles
Jeez, I couldn't put it better myself in a million
years..............bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 07:29:27 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:19:29 -0600, "Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Sorry. God doesn't and didn't arrange things that way. Mankind did.
$$ Uh, no. Read it again. God gave them LAWS to live by and never said a
word in the woman's, slaves or concubines defense. He forbid homosexuality
(for example) but allowed the capture, giving away like animals and the rape
of young virgins from other cities etc. Why forbid one thing and allow
other atrocities continue? I'll answer that - he didn't see them as
atrocities.
Uh, no. Read it again. Those "Laws" from the early OT are manmade laws.
Specifically, God gave us the 10 commandments. Man made laws to ensure the 10
commandments were being followed, and then man made laws to ensure that the laws
ensuring the ten commandments were being followed were being followed.
Jesus is your best friend.
$$ He hasn't showed up yet...... everyone's been waiting 2000+ years
already.
That's for his second return (or as the Church says - Christ will return again)
- and that could be billions of years in the future.
His first return was on the 3rd day after his death on the cross.
$$ Why did it take a mere man, a human to do this and not god himself?
God doesn't run our lives. We do.
$$ So we were supposed to DISOBEY him, not keep slaves, not stone non-virgin
brides to death as he commanded, not slaughter whole villages on his say-so
and live moral lives?
No, that's what man did in disobedience to God. It started with A&E. They
didn't do it on his say-so, but in fulfillment of their own agenda of being as
gods themselves. See A&E.
You don't understand. God has never run our lives. He calls us to do
right
thru choice, but doesn't pull the strings.
$$ I see,....So we were supposed to *DISOBEY* him, not keep slaves, not
stone non-virgin brides to death as he commanded
no such commandment.
There's only one God, and he's your best friend.
$$ He is? That's odd since no one but schizophrenics have seen or heard
from him in well over 2500 years...... when do you figure he'll show up at
my house for coffee and truffles?
Only the Father knows that date.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
10 Dec 2005 12:51:10 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
"Cracklin'" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
How is it to a woman's advantage to be "submissive" to the man? How do you
mean submissive?
In biblical times, a woman was property, to be used by her man as he saw fit.
It's still like that in the Muslim world, as you may notice on the tv today.
And you neocons want to bring that back for the Western world as well.
Jesus was the first man to call for equality,
Since when do you care about what Jesus said?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 07:30:19 AM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2005 10:51:10 -0800, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
In biblical times, a woman was property, to be used by her man as he saw fit.
It's still like that in the Muslim world, as you may notice on the tv today.
And you neocons want to bring that back for the Western world as well.
No, we are the ones that follow the NT.
Jesus was the first man to call for equality,
Since when do you care about what Jesus said?
Each and every waking moment of my life.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 07:34:23 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:30:19 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Jesus was the first man to call for equality,
Since when do you care about what Jesus said?
Each and every waking moment of my life.
And yet, you break commandments in the process.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 03:57:40 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:34:23 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Jesus was the first man to call for equality,
Since when do you care about what Jesus said?
Each and every waking moment of my life.
And yet, you break commandments in the process.
Where? By correcting you?
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the bible anti-woman? |
11 Dec 2005 12:31:19 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
In biblical times, a woman was property, to be used by her man as he saw fit.
It's still like that in the Muslim world, as you may notice on the tv today.
And you neocons want to bring that back for the Western world as well.
No, we are the ones that follow the NT.
No you don't. Promoting war, spewing hate, and lies about people are
not things that come form God.
Jesus was the first man to call for equality,
Since when do you care about what Jesus said?
Each and every waking moment of my life.
Tell another lie - we've come to expect them.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|