| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Budikka666" |
| Date: |
02 May 2007 05:41:36 PM |
| Object: |
Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4318131.stm
revealed that measles **DEATHS** had fallen by almost 40% over the
five years surveyed. Deaths. From measles, a disease that we pretty
much ignore in the west these days because we're so good at fighting
it.
BUT EVEN IN 2003, THERE WAS A DEATH-A-MINUTE FROM MEASLES.
Why don't the so-called "pro-lifers" get up in arms about this?
Because they're hypocrites. These deaths occur in nations where the
babies are brown and why would "pro-lifers" care about those off-white
kids when they can show a picture of an aborted white fetus and make
dollars?
According to the article, "It costs less than $1 to immunise a child
with the measles vaccine."
Prayer won't prevent or cure measles. Never has. Religion won't do
it. No god ever came down and wiped out a disease. Science did. A
vaccine will.
Why doesn't a god do something about this? If this god so loved the
world that he gave his only begotten son, why is he letting so many
other sons and daughters die?
Or is there no god at all, just an impotent myth that keeps frightened
children (most of whom are adults) feeling safe in their beds at
night?
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
02 May 2007 05:45:48 PM |
|
|
....i would suggest cutting off her head and fucking her neck-stump...
On May 2, 6:41 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4318131.stm
revealed that measles **DEATHS** had fallen by almost 40% over the
five years surveyed. Deaths. From measles, a disease that we pretty
much ignore in the west these days because we're so good at fighting
it.
BUT EVEN IN 2003, THERE WAS A DEATH-A-MINUTE FROM MEASLES.
Why don't the so-called "pro-lifers" get up in arms about this?
Because they're hypocrites. These deaths occur in nations where the
babies are brown and why would "pro-lifers" care about those off-white
kids when they can show a picture of an aborted white fetus and make
dollars?
According to the article, "It costs less than $1 to immunise a child
with the measles vaccine."
Prayer won't prevent or cure measles. Never has. Religion won't do
it. No god ever came down and wiped out a disease. Science did. A
vaccine will.
Why doesn't a god do something about this? If this god so loved the
world that he gave his only begotten son, why is he letting so many
other sons and daughters die?
Or is there no god at all, just an impotent myth that keeps frightened
children (most of whom are adults) feeling safe in their beds at
night?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BAM" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
04 May 2007 07:24:24 PM |
|
|
Every abortion results in a death.
BAM
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1178145696.124202.278170@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4318131.stm
revealed that measles **DEATHS** had fallen by almost 40% over the
five years surveyed. Deaths. From measles, a disease that we pretty
much ignore in the west these days because we're so good at fighting
it.
BUT EVEN IN 2003, THERE WAS A DEATH-A-MINUTE FROM MEASLES.
Why don't the so-called "pro-lifers" get up in arms about this?
Because they're hypocrites. These deaths occur in nations where the
babies are brown and why would "pro-lifers" care about those off-white
kids when they can show a picture of an aborted white fetus and make
dollars?
According to the article, "It costs less than $1 to immunise a child
with the measles vaccine."
Prayer won't prevent or cure measles. Never has. Religion won't do
it. No god ever came down and wiped out a disease. Science did. A
vaccine will.
Why doesn't a god do something about this? If this god so loved the
world that he gave his only begotten son, why is he letting so many
other sons and daughters die?
Or is there no god at all, just an impotent myth that keeps frightened
children (most of whom are adults) feeling safe in their beds at
night?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
04 May 2007 07:40:52 PM |
|
|
In article <L8Q_h.24081$XU4.17058@bignews8.bellsouth.net>,
"BAM" <mcca5761@blahblahbellsouth.net> wrote:
Every abortion results in a death.
as does every removal of a cancer.
you probably want to rethink your failed logic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
04 May 2007 09:25:03 PM |
|
|
On May 4, 8:40 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <L8Q_h.24081$XU4.17...@bignews8.bellsouth.net>,
"BAM" <mcca5...@blahblahbellsouth.net> wrote:
Every abortion results in a death.
as does every removal of a cancer.
That's only if it is a botched operation and they take out the heart
by mistake. ;)
I think what the previous statement should have been is "Every
abortion results in the death of an organism." In a sense, an
amputation of the arm is not a death in our present vernacular.
Although it could be argued that the arm died. But that does not need
to result in what common ussage of the term reffers to...the death of
the patient...and yes, one of our local doctors in a recent article he
wrote in the paper, reffered to the unborn as a patient. So, even more
precisely worded statement should have been..."Every abortion results
in the death of a patient as a direct result of the care given by the
attending physician." In this case, I use the word "care" loosely.
you probably want to rethink your failed logic.
The wording might have been a bit better, but there is nothing wrong
with the logic that was presented. There is not a single physician
that you will find anywhere that will call the unborn a tumor. The
failed logic is to consider them on equal footing as you have done.
So, my friend, it would seem that you are guilty of the charge that
you leveled against BAM. Now show some civility and apologise to BAM.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
05 May 2007 04:25:32 PM |
|
|
On May 4, 7:24 pm, "BAM" <mcca5...@blahblahbellsouth.net> wrote:
Every abortion results in a death.
A death-a-minute from measles. FROM MEASLES. Your church could
prevent it. Instead, it hoardes its millions and whines about
abortion like the cowardly vacuous piece of ***** it is.
That's the bototm line. You're **ALL** a bunch of weasely hypocrites
and every message you post proves it. That's what *this* thread is
about.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "willow" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
05 May 2007 08:45:34 PM |
|
|
On May 5, 4:25 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
On May 4, 7:24 pm, "BAM" <mcca5...@blahblahbellsouth.net> wrote:
Every abortion results in a death.
A death-a-minute from measles. FROM MEASLES. Your church could
prevent it.
What are you doing about it besides stressing and sending
nasty posts?
Instead, it hoardes its millions and whines about
abortion like the cowardly vacuous piece of ***** it is.
That's the bototm line. You're **ALL** a bunch of weasely hypocrites
So, what are you? A Catholic baiter perhaps?
and every message you post proves it. That's what *this* thread is
about.
It's probably about baiting Catholics.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
06 May 2007 06:00:39 AM |
|
|
In article <1178415934.777100.193820@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
willow <willowrun06@comcast.net> wrote:
Instead, it hoardes its millions and whines about
abortion like the cowardly vacuous piece of ***** it is.
That's the bototm line. You're **ALL** a bunch of weasely hypocrites
So, what are you? A Catholic baiter perhaps?
asserting facts should never be considered baiting.
and every message you post proves it. That's what *this* thread is
about.
It's probably about baiting Catholics.
no, it was about asserting facts.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
10 May 2007 03:48:28 PM |
|
|
On May 6, 7:00 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178415934.777100.193...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
willow <willowru...@comcast.net> wrote:
Instead, it hoardes its millions and whines about
abortion like the cowardly vacuous piece of ***** it is.
That's the bototm line. You're **ALL** a bunch of weasely hypocrites
So, what are you? A Catholic baiter perhaps?
asserting facts should never be considered baiting.
and every message you post proves it. That's what *this* thread is
about.
It's probably about baiting Catholics.
no, it was about asserting facts.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
10 May 2007 04:18:06 PM |
|
|
In article <1178830108.101341.255320@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarrido@aol.com" <yarrido@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
10 May 2007 05:17:57 PM |
|
|
On May 10, 5:18 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178830108.101341.255...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
Mother Theresa was no joke. She dedicated her life to helping those
less fortunate. I suspect that the only thing you have dedicated your
lift to is stuffing your face. Therefore, you are disqualified from
judging your betters.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
10 May 2007 05:51:13 PM |
|
|
In article <1178835477.395668.64390@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"yarrido@aol.com" <yarrido@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 5:18 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178830108.101341.255...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
Mother Theresa was no joke.
that's for sure. she was one of the world's true monsters.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
10 May 2007 07:51:50 PM |
|
|
On May 10, 6:51 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178835477.395668.64...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 5:18 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178830108.101341.255...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
Mother Theresa was no joke.
that's for sure. she was one of the world's true monsters.
Of course and Pol Pot and Stalin where the very model of sianthood.
What shining examples they were of what the very best of the best of
atheist can accomplish. I'm sure you can be proud to stand on the
shoulders of those giants.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
10 May 2007 07:58:30 PM |
|
|
In article <1178844710.211556.271370@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
"yarrido@aol.com" <yarrido@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 6:51 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178835477.395668.64...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 5:18 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178830108.101341.255...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
Mother Theresa was no joke.
that's for sure. she was one of the world's true monsters.
Of course and Pol Pot and Stalin where the very model of sianthood.
compared to mother theresa, that's for sure.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
10 May 2007 09:43:28 PM |
|
|
On May 10, 8:58 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178844710.211556.271...@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 6:51 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178835477.395668.64...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 5:18 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178830108.101341.255...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
Mother Theresa was no joke.
that's for sure. she was one of the world's true monsters.
Of course and Pol Pot and Stalin where the very model of sianthood.
compared to mother theresa, that's for sure.
Come back when you get to see the wizard....scarecrow.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
11 May 2007 12:07:10 PM |
|
|
On 10 May 2007 17:51:50 -0700, "yarrido@aol.com" <yarrido@aol.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 6:51 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178835477.395668.64...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 5:18 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178830108.101341.255...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
Mother Theresa was no joke.
that's for sure. she was one of the world's true monsters.
Of course and Pol Pot and Stalin where the very model of sianthood.
Straw man.
No one has ever made such a claim for either.
--
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
11 May 2007 12:28:49 PM |
|
|
On May 11, 10:07 am, Dubh Ghall <p...@pooks.hill.fey> wrote:
On 10 May 2007 17:51:50 -0700, "yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 6:51 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178835477.395668.64...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 5:18 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178830108.101341.255...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
Mother Theresa was no joke.
that's for sure. she was one of the world's true monsters.
Of course and Pol Pot and Stalin where the very model of sianthood.
Straw man.
No one has ever made such a claim for either.
Sraw man..I didn't say they did.
--
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
11 May 2007 05:18:44 PM |
|
|
On 11 May 2007 10:28:49 -0700, "yarrido@aol.com" <yarrido@aol.com>
wrote:
On May 11, 10:07 am, Dubh Ghall <p...@pooks.hill.fey> wrote:
On 10 May 2007 17:51:50 -0700, "yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 6:51 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178835477.395668.64...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 5:18 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178830108.101341.255...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
Mother Theresa was no joke.
that's for sure. she was one of the world's true monsters.
Of course and Pol Pot and Stalin where the very model of sianthood.
Straw man.
No one has ever made such a claim for either.
Sraw man..I didn't say they did.
In which case, they are an unconnected irrelevance, which you
introduced to the debate.
That means that it is also a non sequitur.
--
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
10 May 2007 09:44:05 PM |
|
|
in article 1178835477.395668.64390@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
at wrote on 5/10/07 6:17 PM:
On May 10, 5:18 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178830108.101341.255...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
you're making a joke (although a bad one), right?
Mother Theresa was no joke. She dedicated her life to helping those
less fortunate.
Expecting her to wait on you for all eternity?
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
10 May 2007 04:22:03 PM |
|
|
On May 10, 3:48 pm, "yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:00 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178415934.777100.193...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
willow <willowru...@comcast.net> wrote:
Instead, it hoardes its millions and whines about
abortion like the cowardly vacuous piece of ***** it is.
That's the bototm line. You're **ALL** a bunch of weasely hypocrites
So, what are you? A Catholic baiter perhaps?
asserting facts should never be considered baiting.
and every message you post proves it. That's what *this* thread is
about.
It's probably about baiting Catholics.
no, it was about asserting facts.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
Yeah, *she* was a real peach, wasn't she? LoL!
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
11 May 2007 12:13:36 PM |
|
|
On 10 May 2007 14:22:03 -0700, Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
On May 10, 3:48 pm, "yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:00 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178415934.777100.193...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
willow <willowru...@comcast.net> wrote:
Instead, it hoardes its millions and whines about
abortion like the cowardly vacuous piece of ***** it is.
That's the bototm line. You're **ALL** a bunch of weasely hypocrites
So, what are you? A Catholic baiter perhaps?
asserting facts should never be considered baiting.
and every message you post proves it. That's what *this* thread is
about.
It's probably about baiting Catholics.
no, it was about asserting facts.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
Jesus instructed his followers to arm them selves even if they had
to sell their coats to buy one. Swords were the best defense weapons
at that time. Nothing in the teachings of Jesus indicates that he had
any idea about voting for rulers. But he was very much the Liberal,
and I doubt he would vote for today's Republican. Assuming that the
stories are true.
To attack Catholics, who have had such wonderful people as Mother
Theresa among their ranks, for a lack of compassion toward the poor
and ill is perhaps one of the most laughable things ever heard of.
Yeah, *she* was a real peach, wasn't she? LoL!
Budikka
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
11 May 2007 02:08:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:13:36 -0700, Robert <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote:
Jesus instructed his followers to arm them selves even if they had
to sell their coats to buy one. Swords were the best defense weapons
at that time. Nothing in the teachings of Jesus indicates that he had
any idea about voting for rulers. But he was very much the Liberal,
and I doubt he would vote for today's Republican. Assuming that the
stories are true.
Jesus would turn around and leave the world again is he even thought a liberal
then is defined by a liberal today. You know the liberal party today - defined
by the hands-out "gimme something, mister" minorities, queers, lesbians,
abortion queens, gay marriage supporters and other associated left wing fringe
element types like bud the dud.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
11 May 2007 11:24:58 AM |
|
|
On May 11, 12:13 pm, Robert <rob...@netportusa.com> wrote:
On 10 May 2007 14:22:03 -0700, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
wrote:
On May 10, 3:48 pm, "yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:00 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178415934.777100.193...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
willow <willowru...@comcast.net> wrote:
Instead, it hoardes its millions and whines about
abortion like the cowardly vacuous piece of ***** it is.
That's the bototm line. You're **ALL** a bunch of weasely hypocrites
So, what are you? A Catholic baiter perhaps?
asserting facts should never be considered baiting.
and every message you post proves it. That's what *this* thread is
about.
It's probably about baiting Catholics.
no, it was about asserting facts.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
Jesus instructed his followers to arm them selves even if they had
to sell their coats to buy one. Swords were the best defense weapons
at that time. Nothing in the teachings of Jesus indicates that he had
any idea about voting for rulers. But he was very much the Liberal,
and I doubt he would vote for today's Republican. Assuming that the
stories are true.
You talk about this Jesus like he really existed! Where's your
objective reliable evidence that there ever was a Jesus Christ,
miracle-working son-of-a-god?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
12 May 2007 01:09:54 PM |
|
|
On 11 May 2007 09:24:58 -0700, Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
On May 11, 12:13 pm, Robert <rob...@netportusa.com> wrote:
On 10 May 2007 14:22:03 -0700, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
wrote:
On May 10, 3:48 pm, "yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:00 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178415934.777100.193...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
willow <willowru...@comcast.net> wrote:
Instead, it hoardes its millions and whines about
abortion like the cowardly vacuous piece of ***** it is.
That's the bototm line. You're **ALL** a bunch of weasely hypocrites
So, what are you? A Catholic baiter perhaps?
asserting facts should never be considered baiting.
and every message you post proves it. That's what *this* thread is
about.
It's probably about baiting Catholics.
no, it was about asserting facts.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
Jesus instructed his followers to arm them selves even if they had
to sell their coats to buy one. Swords were the best defense weapons
at that time. Nothing in the teachings of Jesus indicates that he had
any idea about voting for rulers. But he was very much the Liberal,
and I doubt he would vote for today's Republican. Assuming that the
stories are true.
You talk about this Jesus like he really existed! Where's your
objective reliable evidence that there ever was a Jesus Christ,
miracle-working son-of-a-god?
Budikka
Because there are millions of mentally defectives that believes the
bull *****, and I was addressing them. It the stupid fuckers would
follow his teaching, they wouldn't be a problem.
Now what part of "assuming the stories are true" did you not
understand?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
13 May 2007 06:55:24 AM |
|
|
On May 12, 1:09 pm, Robert <rob...@netportusa.com> wrote:
On 11 May 2007 09:24:58 -0700, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
wrote:
On May 11, 12:13 pm, Robert <rob...@netportusa.com> wrote:
On 10 May 2007 14:22:03 -0700, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
wrote:
On May 10, 3:48 pm, "yarr...@aol.com" <yarr...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 6, 7:00 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178415934.777100.193...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
willow <willowru...@comcast.net> wrote:
Instead, it hoardes its millions and whines about
abortion like the cowardly vacuous piece of ***** it is.
That's the bototm line. You're **ALL** a bunch of weasely hypocrites
So, what are you? A Catholic baiter perhaps?
asserting facts should never be considered baiting.
and every message you post proves it. That's what *this* thread is
about.
It's probably about baiting Catholics.
no, it was about asserting facts.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
Jesus instructed his followers to arm them selves even if they had
to sell their coats to buy one. Swords were the best defense weapons
at that time. Nothing in the teachings of Jesus indicates that he had
any idea about voting for rulers. But he was very much the Liberal,
and I doubt he would vote for today's Republican. Assuming that the
stories are true.
You talk about this Jesus like he really existed! Where's your
objective reliable evidence that there ever was a Jesus Christ,
miracle-working son-of-a-god?
Budikka
Because there are millions of mentally defectives that believes the
bull *****, and I was addressing them. It the stupid fuckers would
follow his teaching, they wouldn't be a problem.
Now what part of "assuming the stories are true" did you not
understand?
The part that starts out with sentences like "[I]It the stupid fuckers
would follow his teaching, they wouldn't be a problem..."
If there was no Jesus, how can there be a "teaching" from this Jesus?
And what evidence are you offering that there wouldn't be a problem if
people followed what is purported to be his teaching? Are you saying
we should abandon our families and follow a myth? That we should take
up swords? That we should wander around and panhandle instead of
holding down a useful job? That if someone steals our coat we should
give them our shirt, thereby encouraging and condoning theft and let
them get away with it? That if someone kidnaps us we should go
willingly twice as far as they intended to take us? That we should
blindly curse trees for not fruiting out of season? Shall I go on?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
13 May 2007 08:37:23 AM |
|
|
On 13 May 2007 04:55:24 -0700, Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
The part that starts out with sentences like "[I]It the stupid fuckers
would follow his teaching, they wouldn't be a problem..."
If there was no Jesus, how can there be a "teaching" from this Jesus?
God become man is a historical figure. See the bible you like to quote.
And what evidence are you offering that there wouldn't be a problem if
people followed what is purported to be his teaching? Are you saying
we should abandon our families and follow a myth?
You're the one that believes a myth that there is no almighty God.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jaguar" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
13 May 2007 08:40:30 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On 13 May 2007 04:55:24 -0700, Budikka666 ?budikka1@netscape.net? wrote:
?The part that starts out with sentences like "[I]It the stupid fuckers
?would follow his teaching, they wouldn't be a problem..."
?If there was no Jesus, how can there be a "teaching" from this Jesus?
God become man is a historical figure. See the bible you like to quote.
?And what evidence are you offering that there wouldn't be a problem if
?people followed what is purported to be his teaching? Are you saying
?we should abandon our families and follow a myth?
You're the one that believes a myth that there is no almighty God.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
Mr. Webber;
Given the archeological errors in the Bible, the conflicting and
mutually contradictory accounts of creation, and a very flawed dating
system, wholly apart from the fact that the larger number of books were not
written until the era of Nebuchadnezzar II, I believe that I am safe in
saying that the Bible can hardly be used for a historical reference.
--
Felice Schragenheim
"Jaguar"
One of the Lesbian Immortals
"I'd be satisfied with one single moment, so perfect, it would last a
lifetime. For example, this one. This one here is great. I don't want
forever. I want now. Now! Now! Now! I want loads of 'nows' and I want them
til I turn old and grey"- "Jaguar"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
13 May 2007 03:10:41 PM |
|
|
On May 13, 8:40 am, Jaguar <Feli...@LesbianResistance.de> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 13 May 2007 04:55:24 -0700, Budikka666 ?budik...@netscape.net? wrote:
?The part that starts out with sentences like "[I]It the stupid fuckers
?would follow his teaching, they wouldn't be a problem..."
?If there was no Jesus, how can there be a "teaching" from this Jesus?
God become man is a historical figure. See the bible you like to quote.
?And what evidence are you offering that there wouldn't be a problem if
?people followed what is purported to be his teaching? Are you saying
?we should abandon our families and follow a myth?
You're the one that believes a myth that there is no almighty God.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
Mr. Webber;
Given the archeological errors in the Bible, the conflicting and
mutually contradictory accounts of creation, and a very flawed dating
system, wholly apart from the fact that the larger number of books were not
written until the era of Nebuchadnezzar II, I believe that I am safe in
saying that the Bible can hardly be used for a historical reference.
--
Felice Schragenheim
"Jaguar"
One of the Lesbian Immortals
"I'd be satisfied with one single moment, so perfect, it would last a
lifetime. For example, this one. This one here is great. I don't want
forever. I want now. Now! Now! Now! I want loads of 'nows' and I want them
til I turn old and grey"- "Jaguar"
You're quite safe saying that. Your mistake is in thinking that Duck
& Run has even one brain cell capable of addressing it. He doesn't.
His only purpose on Usenet is to repeatedly demonstrate that fact!
LoL!
Notice how he quite stupidly makes the assertions about his god and
this Jesus myth without offering a single shred of the objective
evidence that I asked for? That's becuase he cannot offer such a
thing and he knows it. All he can do is make vacuous assertions.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
11 May 2007 02:09:44 PM |
|
|
On 11 May 2007 09:24:58 -0700, Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
You talk about this Jesus like he really existed! Where's your
objective reliable evidence that there ever was a Jesus Christ,
miracle-working son-of-a-god?
I know he did. Your problem, bubba dud, is that you profess the unsupported
myth that he doesn't.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
07 May 2007 04:16:12 PM |
|
|
On May 5, 8:45 pm, willow <willowru...@comcast.net> wrote:
On May 5, 4:25 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
On May 4, 7:24 pm, "BAM" <mcca5...@blahblahbellsouth.net> wrote:
Every abortion results in a death.
A death-a-minute from measles. FROM MEASLES. Your church could
prevent it.
What are you doing about it besides stressing and sending
nasty posts?
Let me try and spell this out to you so even you can grasp what this
series is all about:
1.
There are people who are desperately seeking to remove choice from
women over what they do with their bodies.
Some of them are called rapists.
Others call **THEMSELVES** pro-life.
2.
The fat bulk of this latter group (and probably the majority of the
former), and all the vocal ones, also call themselves Christians.
That is, they claim to believe in and follow Jesus Christ.
3.
Jesus Christ is a myth, but he purportedly told everyone that his
return was so imminent (2,000 years ago this is) that they should give
up everything and follow him.
4.
Christian churches have millions of dollars.
5.
They didn't give up everything.
6.
They could spend this money (money that Jesus told them to get rid of)
on saving real lives of real, post-partum children who die by the
literal MILLIONS for want of a dollar for a vaccine or ten dollars for
a mosquito net.
7.
They don't, yet they whine about "abortion deaths" while doing nothing
to prevent deaths that they could easily fix almost literally
overnight.
8.
They're hypocrites.
No you can be in denial about this as much as you want, but these are
the facts.
Get it now?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "CE" |
|
| Title: Re: Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid #4 |
08 May 2007 02:28:49 PM |
|
|
On 7 mai, 18:16, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
Let me try and spell this out to you so even you can grasp what this
series is all about:
1.
There are people who are desperately seeking to remove choice from
women over what they do with their bodies.
Some of them are called rapists.
Others call **THEMSELVES** pro-life.
Ah, guilt by association. It=E8s a disingenious tactic. You might as
well say: There's water in the toilet. There's water in your drinking
glass. You drink from the toilet. Yuck!!!
Try to make sense. A rapist is a violent person who uses sex as a
weapon. A pro-lifer uses peaceful means to encourage lawmakers and
citizens to take action so that unborn babies will be protected from
death at the hands of an abortionist.
The rapist hurts women.
The pro-lifer protects children.
2.
The fat bulk of this latter group (and probably the majority of the
former), and all the vocal ones, also call themselves Christians.
That is, they claim to believe in and follow Jesus Christ.
They do follow Jesus Christ.
3.
Jesus Christ is a myth, but he purportedly told everyone that his
return was so imminent (2,000 years ago this is) that they should give
up everything and follow him.
The existence of Jesus is one of the best-documented facts of
antiquity. The comment about giving up everything has to be put in the
context of other comments where Jesus told His followers to bring
things with them. Then, as now, it depended on the situation. In any
case, the comments about giving up everything were clearly never meant
to entail giving up literally everything since that would have meant
the disciples would have been naked as they walked from town to town.
4.
Christian churches have millions of dollars.
Some do, yes.
5.
They didn't give up everything.
That's correct. But they were never intended to give up everything.
6.
They could spend this money (money that Jesus told them to get rid of)
on saving real lives of real, post-partum children who die by the
literal MILLIONS for want of a dollar for a vaccine or ten dollars for
a mosquito net.
Christians do spend a great deal of money helping to save the lives of
children and adults as well. If you're looking for the millions of
dollars to which you referred, you may want to look at the amount of
money spent helping others by Christian charities.
7.
They don't, yet they whine about "abortion deaths" while doing nothing
to prevent deaths that they could easily fix almost literally
overnight.
That's simply untrue.
8.
They're hypocrites.
No you can be in denial about this as much as you want, but these are
the facts.
Get it now?
These are not the facts. Just about everything you've said is
inaccurate.
I do get one thing, though. It's become crystal clear to me that
you're not at all interested in presenting the truth about the
situation in your postings but are, instead, just trying to bait
Christians.
Don't you have anything more interesting in your life to do?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
