Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.



 Science > Abortion > Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,464 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!"
Date: 22 Jan 2005 10:24:14 PM
Object: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Jay Sekulow is an accomplished lawyer, and he and his
Anti-ACLU outfit, the "ACLJ," have even argued cases before
the U.S. Supreme Court. (Almost **always** AGAINST personal
liberties.)
So -- even though he's **misguided** and **hateful** enough
to be an RRR cultist... he is NOT an ignorant person.
But whenever he WHINES about same-sex marriage, he uses
this SAME phrase over and over again: "unelected judges"...
"unelected judges"... "unelected judges"... "unelected judges"...
ad nauseum.
A phrase you'll NEVER hear him utter is: "checks and balances."
(That would be HONEST!)
AS an accomplished lawyer, he KNOWS that the Constitution
purposely **calls** for appellate court judges TO be appointed!
It's a fundamental and constitutional part of our system!
So he's either an ignoramus... which we've ruled out -- OR he's a
LIAR, for directly implying that the judges in Massachusetts who
declared the INCLUSION of same-sex couples in marriage to be
constitutional got there IMPROPERLY. And that they didn't have
the RIGHT to interpret the Constitution in that manner.
The RRR ***counts*** on its being able to pander to the small
percentage of the population that is profoundly ignorant, and prey
upon the gullibility that goes along with that unfortunate condition.
To sway them into supporting their loathsome agendas against
personal liberties and human rights.
FORTUNATELY -- **Most** Americans ARE intelligent enough
to *recognize* Sekulow's dishonesty for being just that -- and to
recognize that this "unelected judges" CRAP is precisely that:
dishonest CRAP that's been crafted to make the country's most
ignorant people believe that appellate court judges aren't *sup-
posed* to be appointed... and that those judges' CORRECT
interpretation of the Constitution was something OTHER than
a case of their having done their job **properly.**
RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water
Dangerous as hell... poisonous to our liberties... and
unconscionably hateful and sociopathic.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.

User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 23 Jan 2005 02:34:59 AM
"Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,464 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:41fa1e11.87296602@netnews.mchsi.com...


Jay Sekulow is an accomplished lawyer, and he and his
Anti-ACLU outfit, the "ACLJ," have even argued cases before
the U.S. Supreme Court. (Almost **always** AGAINST personal
liberties.)

So -- even though he's **misguided** and **hateful** enough
to be an RRR cultist... he is NOT an ignorant person.

But whenever he WHINES about same-sex marriage, he uses
this SAME phrase over and over again: "unelected judges"...
"unelected judges"... "unelected judges"... "unelected judges"...
ad nauseum.

but only against judges who are NOT a part of the religious/political
extremist right.


A phrase you'll NEVER hear him utter is: "checks and balances."

(That would be HONEST!)

AS an accomplished lawyer, he KNOWS that the Constitution
purposely **calls** for appellate court judges TO be appointed!
It's a fundamental and constitutional part of our system!

So he's either an ignoramus... which we've ruled out -- OR he's a
LIAR, for directly implying that the judges in Massachusetts who
declared the INCLUSION of same-sex couples in marriage to be
constitutional got there IMPROPERLY. And that they didn't have
the RIGHT to interpret the Constitution in that manner.

He's a lawyer .....
and he's a right wing fanatic....
either of which should be enough to question ANYTHING he says.
.
User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 23 Jan 2005 11:09:20 AM
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 03:34:59 -0500,
"ZenIsWhen" <here'slooking@youkid.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

Jay Sekulow is an accomplished lawyer, and he and his
Anti-ACLU outfit, the "ACLJ," have even argued cases before
the U.S. Supreme Court. (Almost **always** AGAINST personal
liberties.)

So -- even though he's **misguided** and **hateful** enough
to be an RRR cultist... he is NOT an ignorant person.

But whenever he WHINES about same-sex marriage, he uses
this SAME phrase over and over again: "unelected judges"...
"unelected judges"... "unelected judges"... "unelected judges"...
ad nauseum.

But only against judges who are NOT a part of the religious/
political extremist right.

Very true!! The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with
them as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)
And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.
If the RRR weren't so good at LYING, they wouldn't be good
for anything at all. With "friends" like the RRR infesting our
nation, Americans don't need any enemies. They are as threat-
ening to our liberties as the EXternal terrorists are to our
infrastructure.

A phrase you'll NEVER hear him utter is: "checks and balances."

(That would be HONEST!)

AS an accomplished lawyer, he KNOWS that the Constitution
purposely **calls** for appellate court judges TO be appointed!
It's a fundamental and constitutional part of our system!

So he's either an ignoramus... which we've ruled out -- OR he's a
LIAR, for directly implying that the judges in Massachusetts who
declared the INCLUSION of same-sex couples in marriage to be
constitutional got there IMPROPERLY. And that they didn't have
the RIGHT to interpret the Constitution in that manner.

He's a lawyer .....
and he's a right wing fanatic....
either of which should be enough to question ANYTHING he says.

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
User: "Bonnie Bitch spammeseymour@spammeallnightlong"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 23 Jan 2005 11:22:41 AM
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:09:20 GMT,
(Craig Chilton
-- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!)
wrote:

The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with
them as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)

And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.

Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!
And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves *****
their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
school.
Of course, they also ***** and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to argue
their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.
It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
own liberties.
Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
country of residence, grateful that I got the ***** out in time.
But that's just me.
DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!
Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie *****
.
User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 23 Jan 2005 11:41:08 AM
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:22:41 -0800,
"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree withthem
as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)

And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.

Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!

Thank you.

And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves *****
their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
school.

Of course, they also ***** and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.

HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
with hatefulness and abject ignorance.

It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
own liberties.

Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
country of residence, grateful that I got the ***** out in time.
But that's just me.

I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
Resistance!)

DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!

Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie *****

The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected) is for retiring Supreme
Court justices to be replaced with ones who ARE cultists of the
"Religious" Radical Right... who then will proceed to "theocratize"
America right OUT of being a free country.
That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.
Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.
RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
User: "Bonnie Bitch spammeseymour@spammeallnightlong"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 23 Jan 2005 11:58:23 AM
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:41:08 GMT,
(Craig Chilton
-- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!)
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:22:41 -0800,
"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:



The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree withthem
as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)

And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.


Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!


Thank you.

You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near and dear
to my heart!

And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves *****
their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
school.

Of course, they also ***** and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.


HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
with hatefulness and abject ignorance.

With some bigotry dressing on that salad.

It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
own liberties.

Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
country of residence, grateful that I got the ***** out in time.
But that's just me.


I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
Resistance!)

Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head.
Being the paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect
that Dumbya will declare martial law sometime during late '05 05 early
'06, citing yet another foe from within, and this time it will include
GLBT people.

DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!

Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie *****


The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)

Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more they try
to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just gotta wonder
if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.

is for retiring Supreme
Court justices to be replaced with ones who ARE cultists of the
"Religious" Radical Right... who then will proceed to "theocratize"
America right OUT of being a free country.

Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.

That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.

But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive order,
installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT congress, so
a veto would be highly unlikely.

Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.

Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the sight back
in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.

RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water

Now if they would only take their own medicine.....
Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie *****
.
User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 23 Jan 2005 03:10:19 PM
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:58:23 -0800,
"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

[ ... ]

The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with them
as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)

And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.

Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!

Thank you.

You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near and dear
to my heart!

And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves *****
their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
school.

Of course, they also ***** and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.

HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
with hatefulness and abject ignorance.

With some bigotry dressing on that salad.

To be more concise, yes. (Hatefulness + ignorance = bigotry.)

It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
own liberties.

Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
country of residence, grateful that I got the ***** out in time.
But that's just me.

I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
Resistance!)

Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head. Being the
paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect that Dumbya
will declare martial law sometime during late '05 or early '06, citing yet
another foe from within, and this time it will include GLBT people.

Even as a lame duck, I don't think he could even BEGIN to get
away with doing *that.*

DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION
HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!

The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)...

Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more
they try to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just gotta
wonder if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.

Ask Diebold!! See: www.blackboxvoting.org if that site is still
active.

...is for retiring Supreme Court justices to be replaced with ones
who ARE cultists of the "Religious" Radical Right... who then
will proceed to "theocratize" America right OUT of being a free
country.

Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.

If even so much as ONE egalitarian judge is replaced by a bigot,
that will probably the case for as long as anyone reading this post
today lives -- regardless of the age of the reader.

That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.

But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive order,
installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT Congress,
so a veto would be highly unlikely.

Fortunately, executive orders have their limitations.

Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.

Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the
sight back in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.

Those who don't learn history's lessons are doomed to repeat some
of its mistakes.

RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water

Now if they would only take their own medicine.....

LOL!!! We should BE so lucky!!

Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie *****

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
User: "Bonnie Bitch spammeseymour@spammeallnightlong"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 23 Jan 2005 06:15:30 PM
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:10:19 GMT,
(Craig Chilton
-- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!)
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:58:23 -0800,
"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:



[ ... ]

The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with them
as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)

And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.


Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!


Thank you.


You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near and dear
to my heart!


And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves *****
their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
school.

Of course, they also ***** and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.


HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
with hatefulness and abject ignorance.


With some bigotry dressing on that salad.


To be more concise, yes. (Hatefulness + ignorance = bigotry.)

bigotry leads to unsightly assloafiness, too.

It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
own liberties.

Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
country of residence, grateful that I got the ***** out in time.
But that's just me.


I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
Resistance!)


Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head. Being the
paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect that Dumbya
will declare martial law sometime during late '05 or early '06, citing yet
another foe from within, and this time it will include GLBT people.


Even as a lame duck, I don't think he could even BEGIN to get
away with doing *that.*

I hope not. Then again, I am paranoid....

DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION
HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!


The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)...


Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more
they try to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just gotta
wonder if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.


Ask Diebold!! See: www.blackboxvoting.org if that site is still
active.

Great site! TYVM!

...is for retiring Supreme Court justices to be replaced with ones
who ARE cultists of the "Religious" Radical Right... who then
will proceed to "theocratize" America right OUT of being a free
country.


Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.


If even so much as ONE egalitarian judge is replaced by a bigot,
that will probably the case for as long as anyone reading this post
today lives -- regardless of the age of the reader.

Yup. LIke I said - fucked, hosed, and screwed.

That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.


But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive order,
installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT Congress,
so a veto would be highly unlikely.


Fortunately, executive orders have their limitations.

Let's hope Führer George remembers that.

Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.


Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the
sight back in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.


Those who don't learn history's lessons are doomed to repeat some
of its mistakes.

Try all!

RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water


Now if they would only take their own medicine.....


LOL!!! We should BE so lucky!!

Maybe if we mixed it with some grape Kool-Aid?
Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie *****




-- Craig Chilton <

>

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.

And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)

.
User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 23 Jan 2005 07:23:47 PM
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:15:30 -0800,
Bonnie ***** <spammeseymour@spammeallnightlong> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

[ ... ]

The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with them
as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)

And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.

Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!

Thank you.

You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near and
dear to my heart!

And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves *****
their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
school.

Of course, they also ***** and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.

HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
with hatefulness and abject ignorance.

With some bigotry dressing on that salad.

To be more concise, yes. (Hatefulness + ignorance = bigotry.)

Bigotry leads to unsightly assloafiness, too.

Just as I was about to respond here, one of those little pieces of
advice that NBC-TV gives ("The more you know...") came on:
"Two things to avoid around the house: hate and prejudice.
NEVER let them in!"
That says it ALL!!

It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
own liberties.

Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
country of residence, grateful that I got the ***** out in time.
But that's just me.

I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
Resistance!)

Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head. Being the
paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect that Dumbya
will declare martial law sometime during late '05 or early '06, citing yet
another foe from within, and this time it will include GLBT people.

Even as a lame duck, I don't think he could even BEGIN to get
away with doing *that.*

I hope not. Then again, I am paranoid....

Think positively. It's the BEST way to fight the bigots.

DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION
HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!

The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)...

Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more
they try to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just gotta
wonder if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.

Ask Diebold!! See: www.blackboxvoting.org if that site is still
active.

Great site! TYVM!

You're very welcome. I'm glad it's still active!

...is for retiring Supreme Court justices to be replaced with ones
who ARE cultists of the "Religious" Radical Right... who then
will proceed to "theocratize" America right OUT of being a free
country.

Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.

If even so much as ONE egalitarian judge is replaced by a bigot,
that will probably the case for as long as anyone reading this post
today lives -- regardless of the age of the reader.

Yup. LIke I said - fucked, hosed, and screwed.

I'll re-post an admonition that I put up BEFORE the disastrous
election, that covers what we may be in for in more depth. We can't
undo the election (unfortunately) -- but knowing what we now must
deal with, may help us to strategize better.
It's entitled:
Next Supreme Court Justice: Affirmation of Liberty,
or Unthinkable Tyranny will Result.
I just now posted it, and it'll be on your server in all of the
newsgroups that this thread is reaching.

That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.

But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive order,
installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT Congress,
so a veto would be highly unlikely.

Fortunately, executive orders have their limitations.

Let's hope Führer George remembers that.

Or -- that if he doesn't, he gets a good, swift kick in the butt
from those empowered to limit him.

Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.

Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the
sight back in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.

Those who don't learn history's lessons are doomed to repeat some
of its mistakes.

Try all!

In keeping with my being scrupulously honest in my posts (to the
unceasing frustration of the RRR cultists who'd just LOVE to catch
me in a slip-up in that regard... but never can)... I was allowing for
the possibility that the mistake-makers might not come up with ALL
of the *same* mistakes to repeat. :)

RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water

Now if they would only take their own medicine.....

LOL!!! We should BE so lucky!!

Maybe if we mixed it with some grape Kool-Aid?

LOL!!!!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
User: "Mark Sebree"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 23 Jan 2005 09:52:58 PM
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:15:30 -0800,
Bonnie ***** <spammeseymour@spammeallnightlong> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:


[ ... ]

The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with them
as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy."

Any

appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)

And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal

liberties

are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges

who

callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.


Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!


Thank you.


You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near

and

dear to my heart!


And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these

assloaves *****

their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they

obviously

haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones

who

consistently rule on their side in matters of religious

freedoms, like

when their offspring (usually from the first of their five

marriages)

want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to

public

school.

Of course, they also ***** and moan (usually in a strong

backdraft)

about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough

to

argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.


HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up

there

with hatefulness and abject ignorance.


With some bigotry dressing on that salad.


To be more concise, yes. (Hatefulness + ignorance =3D bigotry.)


Bigotry leads to unsightly assloafiness, too.


Just as I was about to respond here, one of those little pieces

of

advice that NBC-TV gives ("The more you know...") came on:

"Two things to avoid around the house: hate and prejudice.

NEVER let them in!"

That says it ALL!!

It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong

Gong forbid)

they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges

removed or

replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl

like

wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing

their

own liberties.

Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my

new

country of residence, grateful that I got the ***** out in time.
But that's just me.


I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good

fight.

No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the

French

Resistance!)


Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head. Being the
paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect that

Dumbya

will declare martial law sometime during late '05 or early '06,

citing yet

another foe from within, and this time it will include GLBT

people.


Even as a lame duck, I don't think he could even BEGIN to get
away with doing *that.*


I hope not. Then again, I am paranoid....


Think positively. It's the BEST way to fight the bigots.

DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION
HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!


The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW

(since

Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)...


Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more
they try to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just

gotta

wonder if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.


Ask Diebold!! See: www.blackboxvoting.org if that site is

still

active.


Great site! TYVM!


You're very welcome. I'm glad it's still active!

I hope that it stays active. As it stands, there are too few checks on
the new voting machines, and there are too many ways to add cheats into
the system that make sure a particular candidate or party wins which
are also undetectable UNLESS you know what you are looking for. And I
know of what I speak, my Masters in in Applied Computer Science.
Simple, straight forward ways that checks could be added into the
system that would make such cheating and "ballot box stuffing" harder
to do. And to the best of my knowledge, none of these additions would
threaten voter privacy, while they would make cheating harder.
1=2E the programming becomes open source, so everyone can check the
validity and security of the code, especially for hidden traps and
changes on the tallying on the fly.
2=2E Every voter gets a time stamped, bar coded printout of their votes.
Simple register tape would do, and is freely available.
2=2Ea. As the paper tape is made for the voter, and identical tape is
make to store in the machine.
2=2Eb. A reader is available at the voting site that is programmed to
read the voter's tape, and display whom they voted for.
2=2Ec. The voter can all request that his/her votes from the machine be
read using a hand-held reader if a possible discrepancy has appeared.
The access to this can be through a glass plate over the tape, and a
locked door with an access counter.
2=2Ed. If the voter thinks that there is a discrepancy, the voter can
feed his "receipt" back into the machine, where the machine displays
the previous votes, and then voids the old votes on the permanent tape,
and preferably on the voter's tape. The voter can then vote again.
2=2Ee. In order to keep the ballot box stuffing down (I am not naive
enough to think that you can do away with it completely), a change in
ballot can only be down on the same machine (which is NOT encoded into
the voter's tape) and within a certain amount of time, say 10 - 15
minutes.
3=2E The use of the paper tape can aid in recounts, since the tape can be
fed through a reader, and checked rapidly. If a hand recount is
needed, the tape can be checked by the same type of hand readers that
are used on site.
The biggest problems with the current machines by Diebold (besides the
fact that the Board includes friends of Bush), is that there is no way
to check the votes besides the electronic tally, and there are too many
ways to mess with the machines internally. That is why so many people
were against the use of the machines this year.
Mark Sebree

...is for retiring Supreme Court justices to be replaced with

ones

who ARE cultists of the "Religious" Radical Right... who then
will proceed to "theocratize" America right OUT of being a free
country.


Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.


If even so much as ONE egalitarian judge is replaced by a

bigot,

that will probably the case for as long as anyone reading this

post

today lives -- regardless of the age of the reader.


Yup. LIke I said - fucked, hosed, and screwed.


I'll re-post an admonition that I put up BEFORE the disastrous
election, that covers what we may be in for in more depth. We can't
undo the election (unfortunately) -- but knowing what we now must
deal with, may help us to strategize better.

It's entitled:

Next Supreme Court Justice: Affirmation of Liberty,
or Unthinkable Tyranny will Result.

I just now posted it, and it'll be on your server in all of the
newsgroups that this thread is reaching.

That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally

get

off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE ---

***VIGOROUSLY***.


But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive

order,

installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT

Congress,

so a veto would be highly unlikely.


Fortunately, executive orders have their limitations.


Let's hope F=FChrer George remembers that.


Or -- that if he doesn't, he gets a good, swift kick in the butt
from those empowered to limit him.

Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being

taught

that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.


Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the
sight back in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.


Those who don't learn history's lessons are doomed to repeat

some

of its mistakes.


Try all!


In keeping with my being scrupulously honest in my posts (to the
unceasing frustration of the RRR cultists who'd just LOVE to catch
me in a slip-up in that regard... but never can)... I was allowing

for

the possibility that the mistake-makers might not come up with ALL
of the *same* mistakes to repeat. :)

RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking

water


Now if they would only take their own medicine.....


LOL!!! We should BE so lucky!!


Maybe if we mixed it with some grape Kool-Aid?


LOL!!!!



-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.

And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate

destination.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
=20
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)

.

User: "Bonnie Bitch spameseymor@spameallnightlong"

Title: Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment. 24 Jan 2005 04:19:45 PM
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 01:23:47 GMT,
(Craig Chilton
-- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!)
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:15:30 -0800,
Bonnie ***** <spammeseymour@spammeallnightlong> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Bonnie *****" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:


[ ... ]

The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with them
as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)

And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.


Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!


Thank you.


You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near and
dear to my heart!


And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves *****
their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
school.

Of course, they also ***** and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.


HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
with hatefulness and abject ignorance.


With some bigotry dressing on that salad.


To be more concise, yes. (Hatefulness + ignorance = bigotry.)


Bigotry leads to unsightly assloafiness, too.


Just as I was about to respond here, one of those little pieces of
advice that NBC-TV gives ("The more you know...") came on:

"Two things to avoid around the house: hate and prejudice.

NEVER let them in!"

That says it ALL!!

Sadly, the ones who started the house in question are to blame!

It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
own liberties.

Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
country of residence, grateful that I got the ***** out in time.
But that's just me.


I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
Resistance!)


Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head. Being the
paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect that Dumbya
will declare martial law sometime during late '05 or early '06, citing yet
another foe from within, and this time it will include GLBT people.


Even as a lame duck, I don't think he could even BEGIN to get
away with doing *that.*


I hope not. Then again, I am paranoid....


Think positively. It's the BEST way to fight the bigots.

I am positive -- that these assloaves should be removed from the gene
pool.

DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION
HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!


The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)...


Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more
they try to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just gotta
wonder if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.


Ask Diebold!! See: www.blackboxvoting.org if that site is still
active.


Great site! TYVM!


You're very welcome. I'm glad it's still active!

I think it'll be there until the current voting system is held
accountable for the *****-ups.

...is for retiring Supreme Court justices to be replaced with ones
who ARE cultists of the "Religious" Radical Right... who then
will proceed to "theocratize" America right OUT of being a free
country.


Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.


If even so much as ONE egalitarian judge is replaced by a bigot,
that will probably the case for as long as anyone reading this post
today lives -- regardless of the age of the reader.


Yup. LIke I said - fucked, hosed, and screwed.


I'll re-post an admonition that I put up BEFORE the disastrous
election, that covers what we may be in for in more depth. We can't
undo the election (unfortunately) --

Speaking of which:
IN Washington state, the November election for governor --
Running were Christine Gregoire (D) and Dino Rossi (Republ;iCUNT),
from the two major parties. (There were others from the independent
parties, of course).
So, after the election results were in, Rossi won.
The Dems wanted a recount, and the Repubs went along without bitching.
Rossi still won, but by less than 100 votes.
The Dems wanted a hand recount, provided for in the WA rules governing
voting results. The Repubs went along, again, without bitching.
Guess what? Gregoire won -- by 130 votes.
The RepubliCUNTS were OUTRAGED!!!! FURIOUS!!!!
Not only did they demand another recount, amid charges of voting
fraud, name-calling (the nicest thing they've ever said about Ms.
Gregoire is "*****,"), and general RepubliCUNT style nastiness, the
demanded....
and you need to sit down for this....
.... they demanded a "do-over" election.
Can you believe it?
At least the DEM party in WA state had the decency to simply say,
"It's over. We won fairly."
But the RepubliCUNTS -- they bitched and pissed and moaned and
demanded a second election, not provided for under the law.
Can you imagine the viciousness with which the RepubliCUNTS would have
responded if the Democrats had demanded a second election? THink about
how poorly the RepubliCUNTS behaved even when they won.
MORAL OPF THE STORY: the RepubliCUNT party is morally and
intellectually bankrupt.

but knowing what we now must
deal with, may help us to strategize better.
It's entitled:

Next Supreme Court Justice: Affirmation of Liberty,
or Unthinkable Tyranny will Result.

I just now posted it, and it'll be on your server in all of the
newsgroups that this thread is reaching.

I'll have to go find it. TYVM.

That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.


But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive order,
installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT Congress,
so a veto would be highly unlikely.


Fortunately, executive orders have their limitations.


Let's hope Führer George remembers that.


Or -- that if he doesn't, he gets a good, swift kick in the butt
from those empowered to limit him.

You mean those appointed by him?

Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.


Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the
sight back in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.


Those who don't learn history's lessons are doomed to repeat some
of its mistakes.


Try all!


In keeping with my being scrupulously honest in my posts (to the
unceasing frustration of the RRR cultists who'd just LOVE to catch
me in a slip-up in that regard... but never can)... I was allowing for
the possibility that the mistake-makers might not come up with ALL
of the *same* mistakes to repeat. :)

You're far too generous, especially after the RepubliCUNTS loaned
their two functioning brain cells to Tart and Lush, Dumbya's slutty
***** alcoholic offspring. And they say alcoholism isn't genetic. See
what happens when two active alcoholics breed?

RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water


Now if they would only take their own medicine.....


LOL!!! We should BE so lucky!!


Maybe if we mixed it with some grape Kool-Aid?


LOL!!!!

Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie *****


~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.

And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)

.










  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Bush **Continues** to Prove Himself to be an IGNORANT Bigot.
MORE Evidence that RRR Cult lemmings are some of the world's most IGNORANT louts.
Hate-filled Bigots -- The most IGNORANT component of any population.
How IGNORANT are Anti-Choicers/RRR Cultists? "Meaningful Insanity" **demonstrates** that common denominator.
The RRR Cult -- Most Ignorant and Hateful Faction in USA Since Segregation
Re: The Most Stupid Articles of Ignorant and Filthy Authors
Hate-filled Bigots -- The most IGNORANT component of any population.
pro abortionists (pro choice) are intentionally ignorant!
Is Kerry Disingenious or Ignorant?
Ignorant & WHINEY "Da Vinci Code" Protesters help drive Movie to 2nd-highest EVER!!
IGNORANT **Overreaction** to North Korea's Impending Nuclear Bomb Test
Truck-boy is an ignorant tosser
Your average ignorant atheist
Re: Koi Lo is just an ignorant old homo jehovahs witness
Is Kerry Disingenious or Ignorant?
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER