Science > Abortion > LYING SCUMBAG CRAIG CHILTON NOW WANTS TO REWRITE THE CONSTITUTION
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Neill" |
| Date: |
13 Jan 2006 11:03:15 PM |
| Object: |
LYING SCUMBAG CRAIG CHILTON NOW WANTS TO REWRITE THE CONSTITUTION |
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:a83es19g40j4elhl7ihoa0ecpnaeg9sblu@4ax.com...
[[[ READERS: Note the DISHONESTY that was
manifested by the loser who wrote the above
subject header. And then bigots cry in their
beer as they wonder why they have ZILCH
credibility. ]]]
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:58:45 GMT,
Neill M. Laney <nmlaney@hotmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
You're entitled to your opinion. That's a god given right.
Actually, despite the opinionated wording of the Constitution,
it's a MAN-given right, provided by the adoption of the Constitution
that includes it. Just like all the other rights contained therein.
That's not what it says, but why let that minor point deter your god-phobic
agenda.
.
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: LYING SCUMBAG CRAIG CHILTON NOW WANTS TO REWRITE THE CONSTITUTION |
14 Jan 2006 02:39:01 AM |
|
|
[[[ Ignorant and desperate loser, Neill M. Laney,
has **again** PROVEN himself to be exactly
that by starting yet ANOTHER thread having
an abjectly lying and moronic subject header.
He'd be funny, if only he weren't such a total
RETARD. ]]]
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:03:15 GMT,
Bigoted Moron, Neill M. Laney <nmlaney@hotmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
[[[ READERS: Note the DISHONESTY that was
manifested by the loser who wrote the above
subject header. And then bigots cry in their
beer as they wonder why they have ZILCH
credibility. ]]]
(THAT, of course, referred to his *previous* act of such
dishonest desperation.)
Mindless Loser, Neill M. Laney <nmlaney@hotmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
You're entitled to your opinion. That's a god given right.
Actually, despite the opinionated wording of the Constitution,
it's a MAN-given right, provided by the adoption of the Constitution
that includes it. Just like all the other rights contained therein.
That's not what it says, but why let that minor point deter you...
Of COURSE that's not what the Constitution *says*. But HONEST
people know that that is precisely what the Constitution IS.
It is the supreme law of the land. But it contains a fundamental
error, in that its writers either purposely LIED, or displayed an amazing
degree of ignorance (considering their astuteness otherwise) on one
very important point: rights are NOT granted by God. God gave us
free will, and He gave most people a modicum of common sense and
intelligence. Which were employed correctly in this case, from the
standpoint that the human writers of the Constitution were smart
enough and sensible enough to compose it so that IT -- **as** the
supreme law of the land -- conferred RIGHTS to the people.
God's role clearly was just as I described above, which would have
to be very obvious to anyone having more than a marginally-function-
ing brain. (Which apparently disqualifies you.)
God is due a HUGE amount of credit for all of the things He DID
do, and continues to do. But what He did NOT do is confer RIGHTS.
In the case of the Constitution, its **writers** did that.
And WITHOUT their having done that, we very likely would LACK
many of the rights that we have today.
ALSO -- consider that situation faced by the blacks in 1789.
Where were *their* "God-given" rights?
I'll tell you exactly where they were.
In limbo, for nearly another hundred years. Until a HUMANLY-
written and -ratified Constitutional Amendment, and subsequent
changes in law finally CONFERRED those rights.
[[[ Damn, but these RRR cult lemmings TRULY are dumber
than dead pterodactyls!! And they just keep right on
PROVING it to everyone! ]]]
(And I challenge all who think otherwise to show me just
WHERE in the Bible God confers those rights.)
You, of course, "conveniently" OMITTED that challenge.
Which you would find IMPOSSIBLE to meet.
(I've restored everything that you, in your cowardice (since
the points were still in play) omitted.
That being said, my point was not to disparage you. I most
certainly agree that **both** of us are entitled to our opinions.
The only problem is that you keep proving the adage that
"a mind is a terrible thing to waste," which leads to my sensibly
defending the people that you nonsensically abuse via the
misuse of your neurons.
Hopefully, you'll be one of those who ultimately OUTGROW
that deficiency.
But I won't be holding my breath on that one.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
RRR Cultists' mindless and hateful **obsession** with
something so TRIVIAL as the way other people happen to
legally enjoy sex -- is *more* than enough clear and positive
PROOF that they are social retards. Losers. The figurative
equivalent of sewer rat turds floating in the punchbowl of
humanity.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neill" |
|
| Title: Re: STFU LYING SCUMBAG CRAIG CHILTON WANTS TO REWRITE THE CONSTITIUTION |
15 Jan 2006 07:18:57 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:84chs1l7kl60avaclvvohptq5rrq2i68qv@4ax.com...
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: STFU LYING SCUMBAG CRAIG CHILTON WANTS TO REWRITE THE CONSTITIUTION |
15 Jan 2006 12:31:24 PM |
|
|
"Neill" <no@reply.net> writes:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:84chs1l7kl60avaclvvohptq5rrq2i68qv@4ax.com...
Thank you, Mr. Dynamite. You've already proved that you have nothing to
prove.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Iowa 3, Houston 2 (January 12)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, January 15 vs. San Antonio, 5:05
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia Barclay" |
|
| Title: Re: Neill, the Scum Bag, doesn't have anything better to do than to troll--so ignore the little fucker. |
15 Jan 2006 07:34:04 AM |
|
|
<rest snipped>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neill" |
|
| Title: Re: Gaia Barclay, the Scum Bag, doesn't have anything better to do than to troll--so ignore the little fucker. |
15 Jan 2006 08:48:25 AM |
|
|
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1137332044.861537.41550@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
<rest snipped>
Wassamatter, don't want to discuss the issues?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Gaia Barclay, the Scum Bag, doesn't have anything better to do than to troll--so ignore the little fucker. |
15 Jan 2006 12:32:05 PM |
|
|
"Neill" <no@reply.net> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1137332044.861537.41550@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
<rest snipped>
Wassamatter, don't want to discuss the issues?
It'd help if you'd actually do as you demand of others.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Iowa 3, Houston 2 (January 12)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, January 15 vs. San Antonio, 5:05
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
