| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Planet of the Normals" |
| Date: |
24 Apr 2004 10:58:55 PM |
| Object: |
Minority infested cities getting nuked |
The following are the top 25 metropolitan areas in the United States. It
is certain that all of these will suffer disruption, disaster, and
possibly destruction in the near future. It could be subhuman rioting,
it could be power-grid failure, or it could be one of the various
victims of Zionist-American criminality retaliating with nuclear
weapons over their environs. The bottom line is if you are White, and
truly love your family and/or your Race, you will evacuate these areas
as soon as you practically can. Staying in these places presents no
essential benefit to you or our Race, and offers a great many threats
for your continued existence if you stay. But, of course, the choice
is yours. Lack of inclusion on this list obviously doesn't equate to
"safe," so you must use your good judgement if your city is smaller
but still likely to become a hell-hole if utilities were to be
unavailable for more than a few days.
1) Greater New York Metropolitan Area - 21.1+ million. Number one
target in the USA. Command, control, and communications dominating
both US and world networks. Very likely to be destroyed by nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evacuation
areas: upstate New York, Vermont, New Hampshire.
2) Los Angeles Metropolitan Area / "The Southland" - 16.3+ million.
Command, control, and communications center for the western US. Likely
to be destroyed by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very
high. Suggested evacuation areas: Central California Coast.
3) Chicago Metropolitan Area - 9.1+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for the central/Midwestern US. Likely to be
destroyed by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation areas: rural Wisconsin or Illinois.
4) Washington-Baltimore Metropolitan Area - 7.6+ million. Number two
target in the US. Very likely to be destroyed by nuclear weapons.
Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evaucation areas:
rural Virginia / West Virginia.
5) San Francisco Bay Area - 7+ million. Regional command, control, and
communications center for Northern California. Likely to be destroyed
by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation areas: Central or North California Coast.
6) Philadelphia Metropolitan Area - 6.1+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Eastern Pennsylvania. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Pennsylvania or West Virginia.
7) Boston Metropolitan Area - 5.8+ million. Regional command, control,
and communications center for New England. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: Vermont, New Hampshire or Maine.
8) Detroit Metropolitan Area - 5.4+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for eastern Great Lakes region.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high due to very high percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Michigan.
9) Dallas / Fort Worth Metropolitan Area - 5.2+ million. Command,
control, and communications center for Central Southwestern US. Likely
target for destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Texas or Oklahoma.
10) Houston Metropolitan Area - 4.6+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Texas. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Texas or Louisiana.
11) Atlanta Metropolitan Area - 4.1+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for Southeastern US. Likely target for
destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high due to very high percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Georgia or Alabama.
12) Miami Metropolitan Area - 3.8+ million. Regional command, control,
and communications center for Florida. Potential target for nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evacuation
area: rural Florida.
13) Seattle-Tacoma Metropolitan Area - 3.5+ million. Command, control,
and communications center for Northwestern US. Likely target for
destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Washington state.
14) Phoenix Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Arizona & New Mexico. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Arizona, Nevada, or New Mexico.
15) Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for Upper Plains & western
Great Lakes states. Potential target for nuclear weapons.
Infrastructure breakdown risk high, but probably lowest of all metro
areas due to highest percentage of Whites of any major cities.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Minnesota, Iowa, or Wisconsin.
16) Cleveland Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Ohio. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Ohio.
17) San Diego Metropolitan Area - 2.8+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for extreme southern California.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
very high. Suggested evacuation area: rural California.
18) St. Louis Metropolitan Area - 2.6+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Missouri, southern Illinois.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high, due to large percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Missouri or Illinois.
19) Denver Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for Rocky Mountain states and western Nebraska.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Colorado, Wyoming, or Nebraska.
20) San Juan Metropolitan Area - 2.4 million. Command, control, and
communications center for Puerto Rico. Potential target for nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk extremely high, due to almost
100% non-Whites and isolation from continental US. Probably no
permanent White residents who can evacuate.
21) Tampa-St. Petersburg Metropolitan Area - 2.3+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for western Florida.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Florida.
22) Pittsburgh Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for western Pennsylvania & eastern
Ohio. Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk very high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Pennsylvania or Ohio.
23) Portland (Oregon) Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for Oregon. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Oregon or Washington state.
24) Cincinnati Metropolitan Area - 1.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for southern Ohio and Kentucky.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Ohio or Kentucky.
25) Sacramento Metropolitan Area - 1.7+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for California and northwestern
Nevada. Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Northern California.
__________________
The cleansing fire of nuclear warfare. Coming soon to a degenerate
"civilization" near you.
Notice: If you were able to read, you'd realize that I don't "want to
nuke" anyone. I am merely stating a very high probability that some of
these cities will grow mushrooms (maybe from muslims or North Korean
gooks). All of them have a high probability of suffering from social
and/or infrastructure breakdown in the near future (mainly from
niggers and spics that want to take over). WHY would anyone want to
subject themselves to that?
Any racially conscious White staying in these huge concrete deserts
DOES SO AT THEIR OWN RISK.
I think it's pretty clear: Los Angeles' Occidental population is
merely 16% of the total. Most of these are sycophantic dollar-chasing
yuppies, fags, freaks and the elderly. They are not worth the
expenditure of time, energy or resources to convert or save. LA is not
worth the expenditure of time, energy or resources to clear. You can't
"lose" what has already been lost. The "loss" of LA is of no more
concern than the "loss" of Mexico City. The same goes for New York
City. If you and your family choose to live in that shithole called
NYC. You ain't trying to escape. Like it or not, from a military
perspective you ain't worth saving.
Once you deduct the pestilence of 1,750,000 NYC kikes and 490,000 LA
kikes incorrectly included as White Non-Hispanic by some JAREDite
fuckwad, actual White population is 13% in NYC and 16% in LA. And
dwindling by the second...
.
|
|
| User: "SMChristenson" |
|
| Title: Re: Minority infested cities getting nuked |
25 Apr 2004 11:27:43 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 03:58:55 +0000, Planet of the Normals wrote:
The following are the top 25 metropolitan areas in the United States. It
is certain that all of these will suffer disruption, disaster, and
possibly destruction in the near future. It could be subhuman rioting,
it could be power-grid failure, or it could be one of the various
victims of Zionist-American criminality retaliating with nuclear weapons
over their environs. The bottom line is if you are White, and truly love
your family and/or your Race, you will evacuate these areas as soon as
you practically can. Staying in these places presents no essential
benefit to you or our Race, and offers a great many threats for your
continued existence if you stay. But, of course, the choice is yours.
Lack of inclusion on this list obviously doesn't equate to "safe," so
you must use your good judgement if your city is smaller but still
likely to become a hell-hole if utilities were to be unavailable for
more than a few days.
Aside from being a race rant in general, probably advice based upon
historically counterfactual beliefs in particular.
Remember, there are more whites on welfare than blacks. The hidden poor
are in the rural areas and that has been the case throughout history. Rome
was the best place for free bread and colosium shows. And Stalin let the
rural people starve.
If whites move to the country, what are they going to _do_ with
themselves? Rural America is as tied to technology and the economy as
anywhere**. The idea that a person with a few acres of land at least
won't starve is silly. How many farms have two-bottom plows and a horse
team ready for use? Farming today is fuel, fertilizer, pesticides and
irrigation. Utilities? Hell, how many farms are getting city water
through MILES of pipeline either because the groundwater is so nitrate
infiltrated or they are corporate farms that need a factory's worth of
water? And I doubt those milking machines run on kerosene.
No, if some millionaire feels better with a rural survival bunker and the
vain "hope" that he will actually be vacationing there when the big one
hits -- well, whatever keeps him off the prozac. But as general advice,
bah! These people who promote it have probably never even been on a farm.
(** while simultaneously NOT having the broadband and some other utilities
necessary for business)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: Minority infested cities getting nuked |
25 Apr 2004 12:45:06 PM |
|
|
SMChristenson <smchris@visi.com> wrote in
news:pan.2004.04.25.16.27.40.291153@visi.com:
Remember, there are more whites on welfare than blacks.
Whites don't go around smoking the check. Besides, there is a higher
percentage of blacks on welfare than whites.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "America the beautiful" |
|
| Title: Re: Minority infested cities getting nuked |
25 Apr 2004 01:14:19 AM |
|
|
Planet of the Normals wrote:
The following are the top 25 metropolitan areas in the United States. It
is certain that all of these will suffer disruption, disaster, and
possibly destruction in the near future. It could be subhuman rioting,
it could be power-grid failure, or it could be one of the various
victims of Zionist-American criminality retaliating with nuclear
weapons over their environs. The bottom line is if you are White, and
truly love your family and/or your Race, you will evacuate these areas
as soon as you practically can. Staying in these places presents no
essential benefit to you or our Race, and offers a great many threats
for your continued existence if you stay. But, of course, the choice
is yours. Lack of inclusion on this list obviously doesn't equate to
"safe," so you must use your good judgement if your city is smaller
but still likely to become a hell-hole if utilities were to be
unavailable for more than a few days.
1) Greater New York Metropolitan Area - 21.1+ million. Number one
target in the USA. Command, control, and communications dominating
both US and world networks. Very likely to be destroyed by nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evacuation
areas: upstate New York, Vermont, New Hampshire.
But why does NY have to be first?
2) Los Angeles Metropolitan Area / "The Southland" - 16.3+ million.
Command, control, and communications center for the western US. Likely
to be destroyed by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very
high. Suggested evacuation areas: Central California Coast.
3) Chicago Metropolitan Area - 9.1+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for the central/Midwestern US. Likely to be
destroyed by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation areas: rural Wisconsin or Illinois.
4) Washington-Baltimore Metropolitan Area - 7.6+ million. Number two
target in the US. Very likely to be destroyed by nuclear weapons.
Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evaucation areas:
rural Virginia / West Virginia.
5) San Francisco Bay Area - 7+ million. Regional command, control, and
communications center for Northern California. Likely to be destroyed
by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation areas: Central or North California Coast.
6) Philadelphia Metropolitan Area - 6.1+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Eastern Pennsylvania. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Pennsylvania or West Virginia.
7) Boston Metropolitan Area - 5.8+ million. Regional command, control,
and communications center for New England. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: Vermont, New Hampshire or Maine.
8) Detroit Metropolitan Area - 5.4+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for eastern Great Lakes region.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high due to very high percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Michigan.
9) Dallas / Fort Worth Metropolitan Area - 5.2+ million. Command,
control, and communications center for Central Southwestern US. Likely
target for destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Texas or Oklahoma.
10) Houston Metropolitan Area - 4.6+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Texas. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Texas or Louisiana.
11) Atlanta Metropolitan Area - 4.1+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for Southeastern US. Likely target for
destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high due to very high percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Georgia or Alabama.
12) Miami Metropolitan Area - 3.8+ million. Regional command, control,
and communications center for Florida. Potential target for nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evacuation
area: rural Florida.
13) Seattle-Tacoma Metropolitan Area - 3.5+ million. Command, control,
and communications center for Northwestern US. Likely target for
destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Washington state.
14) Phoenix Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Arizona & New Mexico. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Arizona, Nevada, or New Mexico.
15) Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for Upper Plains & western
Great Lakes states. Potential target for nuclear weapons.
Infrastructure breakdown risk high, but probably lowest of all metro
areas due to highest percentage of Whites of any major cities.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Minnesota, Iowa, or Wisconsin.
16) Cleveland Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Ohio. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Ohio.
17) San Diego Metropolitan Area - 2.8+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for extreme southern California.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
very high. Suggested evacuation area: rural California.
18) St. Louis Metropolitan Area - 2.6+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Missouri, southern Illinois.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high, due to large percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Missouri or Illinois.
19) Denver Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for Rocky Mountain states and western Nebraska.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Colorado, Wyoming, or Nebraska.
20) San Juan Metropolitan Area - 2.4 million. Command, control, and
communications center for Puerto Rico. Potential target for nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk extremely high, due to almost
100% non-Whites and isolation from continental US. Probably no
permanent White residents who can evacuate.
21) Tampa-St. Petersburg Metropolitan Area - 2.3+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for western Florida.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Florida.
22) Pittsburgh Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for western Pennsylvania & eastern
Ohio. Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk very high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Pennsylvania or Ohio.
23) Portland (Oregon) Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for Oregon. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Oregon or Washington state.
24) Cincinnati Metropolitan Area - 1.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for southern Ohio and Kentucky.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Ohio or Kentucky.
25) Sacramento Metropolitan Area - 1.7+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for California and northwestern
Nevada. Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Northern California.
__________________
The cleansing fire of nuclear warfare. Coming soon to a degenerate
"civilization" near you.
Notice: If you were able to read, you'd realize that I don't "want to
nuke" anyone. I am merely stating a very high probability that some of
these cities will grow mushrooms (maybe from muslims or North Korean
gooks). All of them have a high probability of suffering from social
and/or infrastructure breakdown in the near future (mainly from
niggers and spics that want to take over). WHY would anyone want to
subject themselves to that?
Any racially conscious White staying in these huge concrete deserts
DOES SO AT THEIR OWN RISK.
I think it's pretty clear: Los Angeles' Occidental population is
merely 16% of the total. Most of these are sycophantic dollar-chasing
yuppies, fags, freaks and the elderly. They are not worth the
expenditure of time, energy or resources to convert or save. LA is not
worth the expenditure of time, energy or resources to clear. You can't
"lose" what has already been lost. The "loss" of LA is of no more
concern than the "loss" of Mexico City. The same goes for New York
City. If you and your family choose to live in that shithole called
NYC. You ain't trying to escape. Like it or not, from a military
perspective you ain't worth saving.
Once you deduct the pestilence of 1,750,000 NYC kikes and 490,000 LA
kikes incorrectly included as White Non-Hispanic by some JAREDite
fuckwad, actual White population is 13% in NYC and 16% in LA. And
dwindling by the second...
--
Chris F
Long Island, USA.
Pizza Express Man and his cat Gayrab.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/expressman.jpg
http://fuckfrance.com/
http://www.fark.com/
My very own impersonation of somebody here in antu. See if you can guess
who it is.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nicedoggie.wav
.
|
|
|
| User: "THX1138" |
|
| Title: Re: Minority infested cities getting nuked |
27 Apr 2004 08:23:12 AM |
|
|
America the beautiful <The_French_suck_Muslim_cock@the_Eiffel_tower.freedom_Fries> wrote in message news:<%GIic.14458$t26.4279053@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
Planet of the Normals wrote:
The following are the top 25 metropolitan areas in the United States. It
is certain that all of these will suffer disruption, disaster, and
possibly destruction in the near future. It could be subhuman rioting,
it could be power-grid failure, or it could be one of the various
victims of Zionist-American criminality retaliating with nuclear
weapons over their environs. The bottom line is if you are White, and
truly love your family and/or your Race, you will evacuate these areas
as soon as you practically can. Staying in these places presents no
essential benefit to you or our Race, and offers a great many threats
for your continued existence if you stay. But, of course, the choice
is yours. Lack of inclusion on this list obviously doesn't equate to
"safe," so you must use your good judgement if your city is smaller
but still likely to become a hell-hole if utilities were to be
unavailable for more than a few days.
1) Greater New York Metropolitan Area - 21.1+ million. Number one
target in the USA. Command, control, and communications dominating
both US and world networks. Very likely to be destroyed by nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evacuation
areas: upstate New York, Vermont, New Hampshire.
But why does NY have to be first?
2) Los Angeles Metropolitan Area / "The Southland" - 16.3+ million.
Command, control, and communications center for the western US. Likely
to be destroyed by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very
high. Suggested evacuation areas: Central California Coast.
3) Chicago Metropolitan Area - 9.1+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for the central/Midwestern US. Likely to be
destroyed by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation areas: rural Wisconsin or Illinois.
4) Washington-Baltimore Metropolitan Area - 7.6+ million. Number two
target in the US. Very likely to be destroyed by nuclear weapons.
Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evaucation areas:
rural Virginia / West Virginia.
5) San Francisco Bay Area - 7+ million. Regional command, control, and
communications center for Northern California. Likely to be destroyed
by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation areas: Central or North California Coast.
6) Philadelphia Metropolitan Area - 6.1+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Eastern Pennsylvania. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Pennsylvania or West Virginia.
7) Boston Metropolitan Area - 5.8+ million. Regional command, control,
and communications center for New England. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: Vermont, New Hampshire or Maine.
8) Detroit Metropolitan Area - 5.4+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for eastern Great Lakes region.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high due to very high percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Michigan.
9) Dallas / Fort Worth Metropolitan Area - 5.2+ million. Command,
control, and communications center for Central Southwestern US. Likely
target for destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Texas or Oklahoma.
10) Houston Metropolitan Area - 4.6+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Texas. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Texas or Louisiana.
11) Atlanta Metropolitan Area - 4.1+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for Southeastern US. Likely target for
destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high due to very high percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Georgia or Alabama.
12) Miami Metropolitan Area - 3.8+ million. Regional command, control,
and communications center for Florida. Potential target for nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evacuation
area: rural Florida.
13) Seattle-Tacoma Metropolitan Area - 3.5+ million. Command, control,
and communications center for Northwestern US. Likely target for
destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Washington state.
14) Phoenix Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Arizona & New Mexico. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Arizona, Nevada, or New Mexico.
15) Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for Upper Plains & western
Great Lakes states. Potential target for nuclear weapons.
Infrastructure breakdown risk high, but probably lowest of all metro
areas due to highest percentage of Whites of any major cities.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Minnesota, Iowa, or Wisconsin.
16) Cleveland Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Ohio. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Ohio.
17) San Diego Metropolitan Area - 2.8+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for extreme southern California.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
very high. Suggested evacuation area: rural California.
18) St. Louis Metropolitan Area - 2.6+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Missouri, southern Illinois.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high, due to large percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Missouri or Illinois.
19) Denver Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for Rocky Mountain states and western Nebraska.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Colorado, Wyoming, or Nebraska.
20) San Juan Metropolitan Area - 2.4 million. Command, control, and
communications center for Puerto Rico. Potential target for nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk extremely high, due to almost
100% non-Whites and isolation from continental US. Probably no
permanent White residents who can evacuate.
21) Tampa-St. Petersburg Metropolitan Area - 2.3+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for western Florida.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Florida.
22) Pittsburgh Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for western Pennsylvania & eastern
Ohio. Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk very high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Pennsylvania or Ohio.
23) Portland (Oregon) Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for Oregon. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Oregon or Washington state.
24) Cincinnati Metropolitan Area - 1.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for southern Ohio and Kentucky.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Ohio or Kentucky.
25) Sacramento Metropolitan Area - 1.7+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for California and northwestern
Nevada. Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Northern California.
__________________
The cleansing fire of nuclear warfare. Coming soon to a degenerate
"civilization" near you.
Notice: If you were able to read, you'd realize that I don't "want to
nuke" anyone. I am merely stating a very high probability that some of
these cities will grow mushrooms (maybe from muslims or North Korean
gooks). All of them have a high probability of suffering from social
and/or infrastructure breakdown in the near future (mainly from
niggers and spics that want to take over). WHY would anyone want to
subject themselves to that?
Any racially conscious White staying in these huge concrete deserts
DOES SO AT THEIR OWN RISK.
I think it's pretty clear: Los Angeles' Occidental population is
merely 16% of the total. Most of these are sycophantic dollar-chasing
yuppies, fags, freaks and the elderly. They are not worth the
expenditure of time, energy or resources to convert or save. LA is not
worth the expenditure of time, energy or resources to clear. You can't
"lose" what has already been lost. The "loss" of LA is of no more
concern than the "loss" of Mexico City. The same goes for New York
City. If you and your family choose to live in that shithole called
NYC. You ain't trying to escape. Like it or not, from a military
perspective you ain't worth saving.
Once you deduct the pestilence of 1,750,000 NYC kikes and 490,000 LA
kikes incorrectly included as White Non-Hispanic by some JAREDite
fuckwad, actual White population is 13% in NYC and 16% in LA. And
dwindling by the second...
--
Chris F
Long Island, USA.
Pizza Express Man and his cat Gayrab.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/expressman.jpg
http://fuckfrance.com/
http://www.fark.com/
My very own impersonation of somebody here in antu. See if you can guess
who it is.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nicedoggie.wav
alt.fan.madonna???
.
|
|
|
| User: "America the beautiful" |
|
| Title: Re: Minority infested cities getting nuked |
27 Apr 2004 08:45:51 AM |
|
|
THX1138 wrote:
America the beautiful <The_French_suck_Muslim_cock@the_Eiffel_tower.freedom_Fries> wrote in message news:<%GIic.14458$t26.4279053@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
Planet of the Normals wrote:
The following are the top 25 metropolitan areas in the United States. It
is certain that all of these will suffer disruption, disaster, and
possibly destruction in the near future. It could be subhuman rioting,
it could be power-grid failure, or it could be one of the various
victims of Zionist-American criminality retaliating with nuclear
weapons over their environs. The bottom line is if you are White, and
truly love your family and/or your Race, you will evacuate these areas
as soon as you practically can. Staying in these places presents no
essential benefit to you or our Race, and offers a great many threats
for your continued existence if you stay. But, of course, the choice
is yours. Lack of inclusion on this list obviously doesn't equate to
"safe," so you must use your good judgement if your city is smaller
but still likely to become a hell-hole if utilities were to be
unavailable for more than a few days.
1) Greater New York Metropolitan Area - 21.1+ million. Number one
target in the USA. Command, control, and communications dominating
both US and world networks. Very likely to be destroyed by nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evacuation
areas: upstate New York, Vermont, New Hampshire.
But why does NY have to be first?
2) Los Angeles Metropolitan Area / "The Southland" - 16.3+ million.
Command, control, and communications center for the western US. Likely
to be destroyed by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very
high. Suggested evacuation areas: Central California Coast.
3) Chicago Metropolitan Area - 9.1+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for the central/Midwestern US. Likely to be
destroyed by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation areas: rural Wisconsin or Illinois.
4) Washington-Baltimore Metropolitan Area - 7.6+ million. Number two
target in the US. Very likely to be destroyed by nuclear weapons.
Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evaucation areas:
rural Virginia / West Virginia.
5) San Francisco Bay Area - 7+ million. Regional command, control, and
communications center for Northern California. Likely to be destroyed
by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation areas: Central or North California Coast.
6) Philadelphia Metropolitan Area - 6.1+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Eastern Pennsylvania. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Pennsylvania or West Virginia.
7) Boston Metropolitan Area - 5.8+ million. Regional command, control,
and communications center for New England. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: Vermont, New Hampshire or Maine.
8) Detroit Metropolitan Area - 5.4+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for eastern Great Lakes region.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high due to very high percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Michigan.
9) Dallas / Fort Worth Metropolitan Area - 5.2+ million. Command,
control, and communications center for Central Southwestern US. Likely
target for destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Texas or Oklahoma.
10) Houston Metropolitan Area - 4.6+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Texas. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Texas or Louisiana.
11) Atlanta Metropolitan Area - 4.1+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for Southeastern US. Likely target for
destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high due to very high percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Georgia or Alabama.
12) Miami Metropolitan Area - 3.8+ million. Regional command, control,
and communications center for Florida. Potential target for nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested evacuation
area: rural Florida.
13) Seattle-Tacoma Metropolitan Area - 3.5+ million. Command, control,
and communications center for Northwestern US. Likely target for
destruction by nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Washington state.
14) Phoenix Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Arizona & New Mexico. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Arizona, Nevada, or New Mexico.
15) Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for Upper Plains & western
Great Lakes states. Potential target for nuclear weapons.
Infrastructure breakdown risk high, but probably lowest of all metro
areas due to highest percentage of Whites of any major cities.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Minnesota, Iowa, or Wisconsin.
16) Cleveland Metropolitan Area - 2.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Ohio. Potential target for
nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk very high. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Ohio.
17) San Diego Metropolitan Area - 2.8+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for extreme southern California.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
very high. Suggested evacuation area: rural California.
18) St. Louis Metropolitan Area - 2.6+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for Missouri, southern Illinois.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
extremely high, due to large percentage of non-Whites. Suggested
evacuation area: rural Missouri or Illinois.
19) Denver Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Command, control, and
communications center for Rocky Mountain states and western Nebraska.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Colorado, Wyoming, or Nebraska.
20) San Juan Metropolitan Area - 2.4 million. Command, control, and
communications center for Puerto Rico. Potential target for nuclear
weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk extremely high, due to almost
100% non-Whites and isolation from continental US. Probably no
permanent White residents who can evacuate.
21) Tampa-St. Petersburg Metropolitan Area - 2.3+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for western Florida.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Florida.
22) Pittsburgh Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for western Pennsylvania & eastern
Ohio. Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk very high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Pennsylvania or Ohio.
23) Portland (Oregon) Metropolitan Area - 2.5+ million. Regional
command, control, and communications center for Oregon. Potential
target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk high.
Suggested evacuation area: rural Oregon or Washington state.
24) Cincinnati Metropolitan Area - 1.9+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for southern Ohio and Kentucky.
Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown risk
high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Ohio or Kentucky.
25) Sacramento Metropolitan Area - 1.7+ million. Regional command,
control, and communications center for California and northwestern
Nevada. Potential target for nuclear weapons. Infrastructure breakdown
risk high. Suggested evacuation area: rural Northern California.
__________________
The cleansing fire of nuclear warfare. Coming soon to a degenerate
"civilization" near you.
Notice: If you were able to read, you'd realize that I don't "want to
nuke" anyone. I am merely stating a very high probability that some of
these cities will grow mushrooms (maybe from muslims or North Korean
gooks). All of them have a high probability of suffering from social
and/or infrastructure breakdown in the near future (mainly from
niggers and spics that want to take over). WHY would anyone want to
subject themselves to that?
Any racially conscious White staying in these huge concrete deserts
DOES SO AT THEIR OWN RISK.
I think it's pretty clear: Los Angeles' Occidental population is
merely 16% of the total. Most of these are sycophantic dollar-chasing
yuppies, fags, freaks and the elderly. They are not worth the
expenditure of time, energy or resources to convert or save. LA is not
worth the expenditure of time, energy or resources to clear. You can't
"lose" what has already been lost. The "loss" of LA is of no more
concern than the "loss" of Mexico City. The same goes for New York
City. If you and your family choose to live in that shithole called
NYC. You ain't trying to escape. Like it or not, from a military
perspective you ain't worth saving.
Once you deduct the pestilence of 1,750,000 NYC kikes and 490,000 LA
kikes incorrectly included as White Non-Hispanic by some JAREDite
fuckwad, actual White population is 13% in NYC and 16% in LA. And
dwindling by the second...
--
Chris F
Long Island, USA.
Pizza Express Man and his cat Gayrab.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/expressman.jpg
http://fuckfrance.com/
http://www.fark.com/
My very own impersonation of somebody here in antu. See if you can guess
who it is.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nicedoggie.wav
alt.fan.madonna???
alt.nuke.the.usa
--
Chris F
Long Island, USA.
Pizza Express Man and his cat Gayrab.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/expressman.jpg
http://fuckfrance.com/
http://www.fark.com/
My very own impersonation of somebody here in antu. See if you can guess
who it is.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nicedoggie.wav
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
