Science > Abortion > Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
02 Jan 2006 12:16:16 PM |
| Object: |
Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
Pro-choice should mean having the ability to know ALL the facts, not just
the ones the LLL want women to know. What is it that liberals are afraid of?
Printed from: http://www.lifenews.com/state1338.html
Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill
Jackson, MS (LifeNews.com) -- Pro-life advocates in Mississippi want
lawmakers to consider another pro-life bill that would already add to a long
list of limits on abortion that have strongly reduced the number of
abortions and closed all but one abortion business there.
Lawmakers will consider a proposal to require abortion practitioners to
provide women considering an abortion the opportunity to see an ultrasound
of her unborn child 24 hours before making the final decision.
Studies have shown that women who see an ultrasound frequently decide
against an abortion.
--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"
.
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 05:28:54 PM |
|
|
in article 020120061358004240%dbarnes@aol.com, David W. Barnes at
dbarnes@aol.com wrote on 1/2/06 4:58 PM:
In article <dpbuci016v@enews2.newsguy.com>, LC <LCisnot@this.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:020120061102594148%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <6rGdnd7T-NJd8CTeRVn-ig@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women
couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
They can, and they might. What you REALLY mean is, "I have yet to see
or hear one convincing argument as to why women couldn't or shouldn't
BE FORCED tolook at the images of the life they are about to kill."
Indeed.
Loons like "J Young" just make it up as they go along.
Because this is America, you *****.
Pro-choice should mean having the ability to know ALL the facts, not just
the ones the LLL want women to know. What is it that liberals are afraid
of?
They DO have the ability to know ALL the facts. What is it with the
"pro-life" crowd? Lying is the only way to create an argument?
I have yet to see "J" present anything resembling an "argument".
The formula seems merely to cut and paste crap from some fundie site, then
run off.
Repeat.
Over.
And.
Over.
LC~ Which is why "J" will never rise above "troll".
I agree. As far as I can tell he simply posts references to news
articles, lies about what they say, and does it all again.
Then masturbates in his pants...
Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 09:12:48 PM |
|
|
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFDF2166.2A372%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article 020120061358004240%dbarnes@aol.com, David W. Barnes at
dbarnes@aol.com wrote on 1/2/06 4:58 PM:
In article <dpbuci016v@enews2.newsguy.com>, LC <LCisnot@this.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:020120061102594148%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <6rGdnd7T-NJd8CTeRVn-ig@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women
couldn't or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to
kill.
They can, and they might. What you REALLY mean is, "I have yet to see
or hear one convincing argument as to why women couldn't or shouldn't
BE FORCED tolook at the images of the life they are about to kill."
Indeed.
Loons like "J Young" just make it up as they go along.
Because this is America, you *****.
Pro-choice should mean having the ability to know ALL the facts, not
just the ones the LLL want women to know. What is it that liberals are
afraid of?
They DO have the ability to know ALL the facts. What is it with the
"pro-life" crowd? Lying is the only way to create an argument?
I have yet to see "J" present anything resembling an "argument".
The formula seems merely to cut and paste crap from some fundie site,
then run off.
Repeat.
Over.
And.
Over.
LC~ Which is why "J" will never rise above "troll".
I agree. As far as I can tell he simply posts references to news
articles, lies about what they say, and does it all again.
Then masturbates in his pants...
"J Young's" love life is no different than the rest of his sorry existence:
virtual.
"anal stimulation with a ***** helps enhance the spanking experience."
From: (Jon Young), one kinky troll.
Newsgroups: soc.sexuality.spanking
Subject: best done with help
Date: 5 Oct 2003 18:00:43 -0700
Message-ID: <567f3dc3.0310051700.31b4eb95@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
03 Jan 2006 02:55:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 18:28:54 -0500, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote
in alt.atheism
in article 020120061358004240%dbarnes@aol.com, David W. Barnes at
dbarnes@aol.com wrote on 1/2/06 4:58 PM:
In article <dpbuci016v@enews2.newsguy.com>, LC <LCisnot@this.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:020120061102594148%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <6rGdnd7T-NJd8CTeRVn-ig@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women
couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
They can, and they might. What you REALLY mean is, "I have yet to see
or hear one convincing argument as to why women couldn't or shouldn't
BE FORCED tolook at the images of the life they are about to kill."
Indeed.
Loons like "J Young" just make it up as they go along.
Because this is America, you *****.
Pro-choice should mean having the ability to know ALL the facts, not just
the ones the LLL want women to know. What is it that liberals are afraid
of?
They DO have the ability to know ALL the facts. What is it with the
"pro-life" crowd? Lying is the only way to create an argument?
I have yet to see "J" present anything resembling an "argument".
The formula seems merely to cut and paste crap from some fundie site, then
run off.
Repeat.
Over.
And.
Over.
LC~ Which is why "J" will never rise above "troll".
I agree. As far as I can tell he simply posts references to news
articles, lies about what they say, and does it all again.
Then masturbates in his pants...
skirt.
--
Fundies and trolls are urged to shove
a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 01:23:23 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
That's because you're a bloodthirsty lunatic who thinks that sex is a
crime and that women should be forced to suffer.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 02:16:47 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43b97dab$0$58058$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women
couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
That's because you're a bloodthirsty lunatic who thinks that sex is a
crime and that women should be forced to suffer.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
What does that lying statement have to do with my question; why women
couldn't or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 06:43:57 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women
couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
That's because you're a bloodthirsty lunatic who thinks that sex is a
crime and that women should be forced to suffer.
What does that lying statement have to do with my question;
It's not a lie. You're a bloodthirsty lunatic who would rather see
people dead than free. So far we know that you want to see gays and
Muslims dead and women reduced to abject slavery.
Like any insane despot, you think you know what's best for everybody,
no matter who suffers and dies as a result.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 03:53:28 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:16:47 -0500, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43b97dab$0$58058$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women
couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
That's because you're a bloodthirsty lunatic who thinks that sex is a
crime and that women should be forced to suffer.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
What does that lying statement have to do with my question; why women
couldn't or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill?
I bet you do, before you sell them.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 04:16:05 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:16:47 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43b97dab$0$58058$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women
couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
That's because you're a bloodthirsty lunatic who thinks that sex is a
crime and that women should be forced to suffer.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
What does that lying statement have to do with my question; why women
couldn't or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill?
Thank you so very much for just proving my point, that you lying
christstain assholes don't care as much about living people as you do
about fetuses.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 04:11:36 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:16:16 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
And right after you hypocritical, lying christstains are forced to
look at the pictures of those about to be executed by the state --
along with pics of the relatives of said person, all of whose LIVES
you're going to destroy to satisfy your bloodlust, then you might have
a point.
But hey -- since you're all about truth, like any other christstain (I
can't believe I just typed that without ROTFLMAO), then let's take
ultrasounds of every pregnancy up for abortion, even the ones that are
still a mass of cells at three and four weeks. And YOU can jolly well
fucking pay for it. After all, showing pictures of deformed,
non-viable fetuses at 6 months to a woman who's only three weeks (or
less) along would be ever so dishonest, wouldn't it, christstain?
Pro-choice should mean having the ability to know ALL the facts, not just
the ones the LLL want women to know.
Yup. We should show pictures of ectopic pregnancies and what they do
to the fallopian tubes when they rupture, too.
What is it that liberals are afraid of?
Personally, for me, my greatest fear is that Charmed will announce
that there's going to be a ninth season, without Piper and Phoebe.
After that, it'd be living in a christstain theocracy with your
brainless self in charge.
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?Ufb2flBhqQ==?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 07:57:44 PM |
|
|
"Bonnie *****" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote in message
news:6f8jr1h4hrftsskvhb7knh1jq1jv03hkl7@fe04.buzzardnews.com...
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:16:16 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
And right after you hypocritical, lying christstains are forced to
look at the pictures of those about to be executed by the state --
along with pics of the relatives of said person, all of whose LIVES
you're going to destroy to satisfy your bloodlust, then you might have
a point.
But hey -- since you're all about truth, like any other christstain (I
can't believe I just typed that without ROTFLMAO), then let's take
ultrasounds of every pregnancy up for abortion, even the ones that are
still a mass of cells at three and four weeks. And YOU can jolly well
fucking pay for it. After all, showing pictures of deformed,
non-viable fetuses at 6 months to a woman who's only three weeks (or
less) along would be ever so dishonest, wouldn't it, christstain?
Pro-choice should mean having the ability to know ALL the facts, not just
the ones the LLL want women to know.
Yup. We should show pictures of ectopic pregnancies and what they do
to the fallopian tubes when they rupture, too.
I lost a friend years ago to a ruptured fallopian tube. She hemorrhaged and
died alone in her house. Her husband found her when he came home from work.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
03 Jan 2006 01:54:28 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 19:57:44 -0600, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of Qöö~Pa©
<invalid@Invalid.Invalid>
"Bonnie *****" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote in message
news:6f8jr1h4hrftsskvhb7knh1jq1jv03hkl7@fe04.buzzardnews.com...
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:16:16 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
And right after you hypocritical, lying christstains are forced to
look at the pictures of those about to be executed by the state --
along with pics of the relatives of said person, all of whose LIVES
you're going to destroy to satisfy your bloodlust, then you might have
a point.
But hey -- since you're all about truth, like any other christstain (I
can't believe I just typed that without ROTFLMAO), then let's take
ultrasounds of every pregnancy up for abortion, even the ones that are
still a mass of cells at three and four weeks. And YOU can jolly well
fucking pay for it. After all, showing pictures of deformed,
non-viable fetuses at 6 months to a woman who's only three weeks (or
less) along would be ever so dishonest, wouldn't it, christstain?
Pro-choice should mean having the ability to know ALL the facts, not just
the ones the LLL want women to know.
Yup. We should show pictures of ectopic pregnancies and what they do
to the fallopian tubes when they rupture, too.
I lost a friend years ago to a ruptured fallopian tube. She hemorrhaged and
died alone in her house. Her husband found her when he came home from work.
I'm sorry for your loss. If my example brought up bad memories, I also
apologize.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Mississippi Lawmakers Will Consider Ultrasound-Abortion Bill |
02 Jan 2006 05:13:10 PM |
|
|
in article 6rGdnd7T-NJd8CTeRVn-ig@giganews.com, J Young at
youngopinions@aol.com wrote on 1/2/06 1:16 PM:
I have yet to see or hear one convincing argument as to why women couldn't
or shouldn't look at the images of the life they are about to kill.
Says a man I think is only here because his mother was stuck having
him...
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
