Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay



 Science > Abortion > Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 17 of 17

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "J Young"
Date: 20 Oct 2005 11:27:02 PM
Object: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay
This woman should claim that she was only exercising her "right to choose"
and have the ACLU represent her in court.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/12955752.htm
Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay
SAN FRANCISCO - A mentally ill woman seen dropping her three sons into San
Francisco Bay from a downtown pier was charged with three counts of murder
Thursday while anguished relatives kept vigil and rescuers combed the chilly
water for the bodies of two of the victims.
Lashuan T. Harris, 23, of Oakland, was held in a hospital jail ward after
police saw her pushing an empty baby stroller away from the pier where a
witness reported spotting a woman drop the children off the end Wednesday
night.
begin 666 spacer.gif
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`( ``$9&1@```"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``
`
end
.

User: "Pauline Barclay"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 26 Oct 2005 10:56:50 AM
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:33:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:34:17 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<ibjul11oa52v8buqk0uuhovr162dh9ltvn@4ax.com> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:03:27 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:39:13 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<8n2sl1dp1otbgs792ja49au74429ku2kgi@4ax.com> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 04:52:26 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:09:51 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<pbjql11aroksudkjpelsqp49sk3hulv5m6@4ax.com> wrote:



If the post is off topic for the group I read, yes. And I will
continue to do so.


And I'll continue to tell you that you're off topic off topics are off
topic.


I would expect this of you.


Acquire a sense of humor and post as off-topically as you wish.


No.


It's a suggestion.


It's still no.

It's still was a made suggestion, it will continue to linger in
the circuit, whether you deny it now and take it in future or you
ignore it altogether.
BTW, you're still off topic.
.
User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 27 Oct 2005 08:12:42 AM
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:56:50 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<8n9vl1pdfkf3lr8itjjb7agrf59ur64k62@4ax.com> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:33:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:34:17 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<ibjul11oa52v8buqk0uuhovr162dh9ltvn@4ax.com> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:03:27 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:39:13 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<8n2sl1dp1otbgs792ja49au74429ku2kgi@4ax.com> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 04:52:26 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:09:51 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<pbjql11aroksudkjpelsqp49sk3hulv5m6@4ax.com> wrote:



If the post is off topic for the group I read, yes. And I will
continue to do so.


And I'll continue to tell you that you're off topic off topics are off
topic.


I would expect this of you.


Acquire a sense of humor and post as off-topically as you wish.


No.


It's a suggestion.


It's still no.


It's still was a made suggestion, it will continue to linger in
the circuit, whether you deny it now and take it in future or you
ignore it altogether.

So what?
I still intend to resist posting off topic, and I will probably
continue to fail in my resolution from time to time as I have here.
And I will continue to point out someone who is initiating a new
subject that is off topic.


BTW, you're still off topic.

.
User: "Pauline Barclay"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 27 Oct 2005 10:07:50 AM
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:12:42 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:56:50 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<8n9vl1pdfkf3lr8itjjb7agrf59ur64k62@4ax.com> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:33:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:34:17 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<ibjul11oa52v8buqk0uuhovr162dh9ltvn@4ax.com> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:03:27 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:39:13 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<8n2sl1dp1otbgs792ja49au74429ku2kgi@4ax.com> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 04:52:26 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:09:51 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<pbjql11aroksudkjpelsqp49sk3hulv5m6@4ax.com> wrote:



If the post is off topic for the group I read, yes. And I will
continue to do so.


And I'll continue to tell you that you're off topic off topics are off
topic.


I would expect this of you.


Acquire a sense of humor and post as off-topically as you wish.


No.


It's a suggestion.


It's still no.


It's still was a made suggestion, it will continue to linger in
the circuit, whether you deny it now and take it in future or you
ignore it altogether.


So what?

I still intend to resist posting off topic,

That was short-lived.
<clip>
.



User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 22 Oct 2005 04:12:16 PM
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:19:22 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<5hbkl11qmqj9n1vl7q3lsfbt89tqh2ji3b@4ax.com> wrote:



I can use the tools, and I do decide what to read.


Fine, but don't decide for others what they can or cannot post.


I cannot make such decision for others.


You do, at least in your arena. People generally ignore you, though.


That is not a problem...


It wouldn't matter to a self-center piece of human waste (speaking
figuratively).

No you meant it directly. But it doesn't bother me - I have been
called worse. I just consider the source.
BTW, I have sat on several juries.
.
User: "Pauline Barclay"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 22 Oct 2005 06:41:49 PM
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:12:16 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:19:22 -0400, Pauline Barclay
<pauline.barclay@blazemail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<5hbkl11qmqj9n1vl7q3lsfbt89tqh2ji3b@4ax.com> wrote:




I can use the tools, and I do decide what to read.


Fine, but don't decide for others what they can or cannot post.


I cannot make such decision for others.


You do, at least in your arena. People generally ignore you, though.


That is not a problem...


It wouldn't matter to a self-center piece of human waste (speaking
figuratively).


No you meant it directly.

No, I meant it not literally. Of course you aren't literally a piece
of human waste though you are, figuratively speaking directly to you.
.


User: "Michael Wardly"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 21 Oct 2005 03:58:58 PM
Reasoned Insanity wrote:

"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:k7fhl1ptgva1nk478a3dbcjmh013geev8q@4ax.com...

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:27:02 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id <BISdnb9NdcY-88XeRVn-tQ@giganews.com>
wrote:

Of topic yet again.


Rarely is anything here on topic. This isn't only the abortion newsgroup,
it's also the ***** about bush group, ***** about church's newsgroup, ect
ect.

It's also the "Jesus saved you--so believe in us or else" group; the
"all niggers, kykes, pregnant women, liberals, abortionists must die"
group; the "I tout the word of God and I know better than you" group.
Etcetera. Must I go on?
.
User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 21 Oct 2005 09:44:33 PM
On 21 Oct 2005 13:58:58 -0700, "Michael Wardly" <heishr@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1129928338.033841.240140@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:

Reasoned Insanity wrote:

"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:k7fhl1ptgva1nk478a3dbcjmh013geev8q@4ax.com...

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:27:02 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id <BISdnb9NdcY-88XeRVn-tQ@giganews.com>
wrote:

Of topic yet again.


Rarely is anything here on topic. This isn't only the abortion newsgroup,
it's also the ***** about bush group, ***** about church's newsgroup, ect
ect.


It's also the "Jesus saved you--so believe in us or else" group; the
"all niggers, kykes, pregnant women, liberals, abortionists must die"
group; the "I tout the word of God and I know better than you" group.
Etcetera. Must I go on?

Just because a lot of cretins post here with off topic material is no
reason to condone or ignore it.
.


User: "David Jensen"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 21 Oct 2005 08:23:43 AM
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:27:02 -0400, in alt.atheism
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
<BISdnb9NdcY-88XeRVn-tQ@giganews.com>:

This woman should claim that she was only exercising her "right to choose"
and have the ACLU represent her in court.

When the government takes our rights seriously, the ACLU will not have
to be around. Until then, it will protect our rights, even yours.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/12955752.htm

Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay


SAN FRANCISCO - A mentally ill woman seen dropping her three sons into San
Francisco Bay from a downtown pier was charged with three counts of murder
Thursday while anguished relatives kept vigil and rescuers combed the chilly
water for the bodies of two of the victims.

Lashuan T. Harris, 23, of Oakland, was held in a hospital jail ward after
police saw her pushing an empty baby stroller away from the pier where a
witness reported spotting a woman drop the children off the end Wednesday
night.

.
User: ""

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 21 Oct 2005 04:56:08 PM
David Jensen wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:27:02 -0400, in alt.atheism
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
<BISdnb9NdcY-88XeRVn-tQ@giganews.com>:

This woman should claim that she was only exercising her "right to choose"
and have the ACLU represent her in court.


When the government takes our rights seriously, the ACLU will not have
to be around. Until then, it will protect our rights, even yours.

That's their cover story so morons won't recognize their current pet
project of protecting the due process "rights" of terrorists and
getting as many illegals into the country as possible.


http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/12955752.htm

Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay


SAN FRANCISCO - A mentally ill woman seen dropping her three sons into San
Francisco Bay from a downtown pier was charged with three counts of murder
Thursday while anguished relatives kept vigil and rescuers combed the chilly
water for the bodies of two of the victims.

Lashuan T. Harris, 23, of Oakland, was held in a hospital jail ward after
police saw her pushing an empty baby stroller away from the pier where a
witness reported spotting a woman drop the children off the end Wednesday
night.

.
User: "655321"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 21 Oct 2005 08:25:04 PM
On 2005-10-21 14:56:08 -0700,
said:

That's their cover story so morons won't recognize their current pet
project of protecting the due process "rights" of terrorists and
getting as many illegals into the country as possible.

They are lawyers. Their job is to practice law, and their power is
limited to what the laws allow, pursuant to the courts' interpretation
of those laws. Their purpose is to do so on behalf of people you don't
like, it seems.
The fact that you don't think that "certain people" deserve lawyers
just points out the need for the ACLU all the more explicitly.
--
GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825 --

"The Earth is degenerating today. Bribery and corruption abound.
Children no longer obey their parents, every man wants to write a book,
and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching."
-- Assyrian Tablet, Ca. 2800 BC
.
User: "Mimi Cohen"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SFBay 21 Oct 2005 09:40:55 PM
655321 wrote:

On 2005-10-21 14:56:08 -0700,

said:

That's their cover story so morons won't recognize their current pet
project of protecting the due process "rights" of terrorists and
getting as many illegals into the country as possible.



They are lawyers. Their job is to practice law, and their power is
limited to what the laws allow, pursuant to the courts' interpretation
of those laws. Their purpose is to do so on behalf of people you don't
like, it seems.

The fact that you don't think that "certain people" deserve lawyers just
points out the need for the ACLU all the more explicitly.

Exactly
.


User: "Uncle Buck"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 21 Oct 2005 05:54:06 PM
On 21 Oct 2005 14:56:08 -0700,
wrote:

David Jensen wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:27:02 -0400, in alt.atheism
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
<BISdnb9NdcY-88XeRVn-tQ@giganews.com>:

This woman should claim that she was only exercising her "right to choose"
and have the ACLU represent her in court.


When the government takes our rights seriously, the ACLU will not have
to be around. Until then, it will protect our rights, even yours.


That's their cover story so morons won't recognize their current pet
project of protecting the due process "rights" of terrorists and
getting as many illegals into the country as possible.

Why do you suppose they would have such a dreadful thing as their goal? What
purpose would it serve for them? :-?
.
User: "Mimi Cohen"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SFBay 21 Oct 2005 09:13:22 PM
Uncle Buck wrote:

On 21 Oct 2005 14:56:08 -0700,

wrote:


David Jensen wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:27:02 -0400, in alt.atheism
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
<BISdnb9NdcY-88XeRVn-tQ@giganews.com>:

This woman should claim that she was only exercising her "right to choose"
and have the ACLU represent her in court.


When the government takes our rights seriously, the ACLU will not have
to be around. Until then, it will protect our rights, even yours.


That's their cover story so morons won't recognize their current pet
project of protecting the due process "rights" of terrorists and
getting as many illegals into the country as possible.



Why do you suppose they would have such a dreadful thing as their goal? What
purpose would it serve for them? :-?

Well none, but then omarenoryt wouldn't have something to ***** about
.


User: "David Jensen"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 21 Oct 2005 07:05:01 PM
On 21 Oct 2005 14:56:08 -0700, in alt.atheism
omarenoryt@aol.com wrote in
<1129931768.540355.222980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

David Jensen wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:27:02 -0400, in alt.atheism
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
<BISdnb9NdcY-88XeRVn-tQ@giganews.com>:

This woman should claim that she was only exercising her "right to choose"
and have the ACLU represent her in court.


When the government takes our rights seriously, the ACLU will not have
to be around. Until then, it will protect our rights, even yours.


That's their cover story so morons won't recognize their current pet
project of protecting the due process "rights" of terrorists and
getting as many illegals into the country as possible.

Which terrorists? The people who the Bush Administration has kidnapped
but refused to try in court? Why would you ever believe what Bush says
again.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/12955752.htm

Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay


SAN FRANCISCO - A mentally ill woman seen dropping her three sons into San
Francisco Bay from a downtown pier was charged with three counts of murder
Thursday while anguished relatives kept vigil and rescuers combed the chilly
water for the bodies of two of the victims.

Lashuan T. Harris, 23, of Oakland, was held in a hospital jail ward after
police saw her pushing an empty baby stroller away from the pier where a
witness reported spotting a woman drop the children off the end Wednesday
night.

.
User: "Mimi Cohen"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SFBay 21 Oct 2005 09:14:31 PM
David Jensen wrote:

On 21 Oct 2005 14:56:08 -0700, in alt.atheism
omarenoryt@aol.com wrote in
<1129931768.540355.222980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

David Jensen wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:27:02 -0400, in alt.atheism
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
<BISdnb9NdcY-88XeRVn-tQ@giganews.com>:

This woman should claim that she was only exercising her "right to choose"
and have the ACLU represent her in court.


When the government takes our rights seriously, the ACLU will not have
to be around. Until then, it will protect our rights, even yours.


That's their cover story so morons won't recognize their current pet
project of protecting the due process "rights" of terrorists and
getting as many illegals into the country as possible.



Which terrorists? The people who the Bush Administration has kidnapped
but refused to try in court? Why would you ever believe what Bush says
again.

The guy is obviously braindead, why else would anyone in 2005 still be
using AOL?
.




User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Mom charged with murder after allegedly throwing kids into SF Bay 21 Oct 2005 10:08:32 PM
What's so funny about peace, love and "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com> posting the following on Fri, 21 Oct 2005
00:27:02 -0400 iin alt.atheism?

This woman should claim that she was only exercising her "right to choose"
and have the ACLU represent her in court.

Except that right ends when birth occurs. Do tryto keep up.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.


  Page 17 of 17

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 


Related Articles
After Vietnam, America said: "NO more quagmires!!" Thanks a LOT, Warmonger-in-Thief!
2 Women Die After RU-486
Religeonists fired over 'morning after' pill
LIVE BABIES BEING BORN AFTER ABORTIONS
Re: Mother, baby attacked on Paris train after mistaken for Jews
Life after Roe v Wade?
After abortion, woman bleeds to death
Another homosexual parade after hurricane devastation
Can We Really Trust Vile, Degenerate Liberals After This?
After tens of millions of abortions, has America lost anything?
MA Catholic Priest Takes Computer Classes After Convicted of Downloading Kiddie Porn
Rightwing Hack Michelle Malkin Receives Death Threats After Her Personal Contact Info is Posted OnLine (Hoisted on Own Petard)
Bush Adopts Democrats' Peace Plan After Attacking it (GOP=Treason)
Operation Rescue buys abortion clinic, gruesome discoveries after evicting renter
What Pro-abortionists Don't Want You to Know About the Morning-After Pill
 

NEWER

pg.662     pg.372     pg.211     pg.122     pg.73     pg.46     pg.31     pg.23     pg.19     pg.17     pg.15     pg.13     pg.9     pg.1

OLDER