'Mom,' 'dad,' targeted by California bias ban



 Science > Abortion > 'Mom,' 'dad,' targeted by California bias ban

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 12

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "J Young"
Date: 12 Sep 2007 11:42:00 AM
Object: 'Mom,' 'dad,' targeted by California bias ban
Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57593
'Mom,' 'dad,' targeted by California bias ban
'Parents want fundamentals, not indoctrination about sex'
A new plan approved by the California Legislature could be used to ban
the words "dad" or "mom" in all public schools as being discriminatory
against "partner 1"' and "partner 2" in same-sex relationships,
according to critics.
The legislation, in fact, seeks to impose a "radical homosexual
indoctrination" on the young children in the state, according to Karen
England, the executive director of Capitol Resource Family Impact, a
new affiliate of Capitol Resource Institute.
"It is simply outrageous that the California legislature continues to
ignore the values and beliefs of citizens by forcing this radical
homosexual indoctrination on our young children," England said.
.

User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch"

Title: Re: 'Mom,' 'dad,' targeted by California bias ban 12 Sep 2007 11:55:38 AM
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...


Is there any wonder why normal, decent people

Which you know nothing about.
.

User: "John D. Wentzky"

Title: Re: 'Mom,' 'dad,' targeted by California bias ban 12 Sep 2007 11:50:09 AM
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...


Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?

Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in government and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually have
children and parents?
What have these idiots against their own parents?
Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.
.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: 'Mom,' 'dad,' targeted by California bias ban 12 Sep 2007 11:19:13 PM
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...

Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?

Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in government and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually have
children and parents?

So why is it that Dale and I are pro-choice, not in the schools or government,
and aren't saddened at all by people who have children and parents - just like
us? (Of course, Dale's parents didn't live long enough to see their first
great-grandchild, but I'm fortunate to be in by early 50s and still have both
my parents alive and ambulatory - and great-grandparents to our three
grandchildren.)

What have these idiots against their own parents?

Buggered if I know...maybe you should go out into your community and try and
find anyone who fits that description. (Unless they're too wise to you, of
course.)

Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.

Really? Dale and I have a number of friends who are gay, and they don't
attack our families for being intolerant bigots...probably because our
families aren't what you want them to be. Yours, OTOH, seems to have an
unusual amount of difficulty in observing some state and local statutes.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 6 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
User: "John D. Wentzky"

Title: Re: 'Mom,' 'dad,' targeted by California bias ban 13 Sep 2007 12:43:38 AM
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkhclz9ozi.fsf@eris.io.com...

"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...


Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?


Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in government and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually have
children and parents?


So why is it that Dale and I are pro-choice, not in the schools or
government,
and aren't saddened at all by people who have children and parents - just
like
us? (Of course, Dale's parents didn't live long enough to see their first
great-grandchild, but I'm fortunate to be in by early 50s and still have
both
my parents alive and ambulatory - and great-grandparents to our three
grandchildren.)

It isn't my fault that you are a charlatan for such people scarfing down as
much of the peoples' tax dollars as you can in your allegiance to treason.
It isn't my fault that you have allied yourself with those who deserve no
compassion and that you are against those who aren;t so deranged as your
bosses who you think you aren't serving.
How does it make you feel to go against another person who NEVER did you any
wrong whatsoever when you lick the assholes of those baby-killing peons?
I bet you feel like a real loser, you idiot.
You lost your integrity and every time you think you can use force to rid
yourself of the constant torment that you feel as a result of your
treasonous behavior you have to check yourself and admit that you are a fool
until you tell those idiots whose ***** you are licking so often thatg you
quit.

What have these idiots against their own parents?


Buggered if I know...maybe you should go out into your community and try
and
find anyone who fits that description. (Unless they're too wise to you,
of
course.)

You should grow a brain and a backbone and stop acting like a poor underling
of criminals.

Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.


Really?

Still can't read english?

Dale and I have a number of friends who are gay, and they don't
attack our families for being intolerant bigots...

I know you lick the ***** of anyone who will forward you a peon check.

probably because our families aren't what you want them to be.

No one cares, humberto watcher.

Yours, OTOH, seems to have an
unusual amount of difficulty in observing some state and local statutes.

***** brigade line of treasonous losers.
.


User: "Budikka666"

Title: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 04:30:51 AM
On Sep 12, 11:50 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...



Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?


Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in government and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually have
children and parents?
What have these idiots against their own parents?
Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.

Hatred of one's parents is what Jesus demanded. Are you saying he was
wrong? Besides, "Mom" and "Dad" are such sexist terms....
Budikka
.
User: "John D. Wentzky"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 06:31:50 PM
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1189675851.369744.108030@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 12, 11:50 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...



Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?


Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in government and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually have
children and parents?
What have these idiots against their own parents?
Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.


Hatred of one's parents is what Jesus demanded.

When, *****?
Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"

Are you saying he was wrong?

That is your angle.

Besides, "Mom" and "Dad" are such sexist terms....

Mom and dad are so sexist that they kick your god damned gay marriage
***** to hell.
.
User: "Dionisio"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 07:30:14 PM
John D. Wentzky wrote:

When, *****?
Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)
For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew 10:35)
Any other questions?
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
Biology is the only science in which multiplication means the same thing as division.
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.
User: "John D. Wentzky"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 07:50:56 PM
"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:46e9d614$0$26364$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

John D. Wentzky wrote:

When, *****?
Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"


If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and
children, and bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he
cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)

For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter
against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
(Matthew 10:35)

Any other questions?

Failure on your part to provide proof observed.
.
User: "Dionisio"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 09:19:29 PM
John D. Wentzky wrote:

"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote:

John D. Wentzky wrote:

When, *****?
Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and
children, and bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he
cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)
For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter
against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
(Matthew 10:35)
Any other questions?


Failure on your part to provide proof observed.

Aww... How cute!
Wentzky wants to deride any part of the Bible that doesn't quote him exactly.
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
I don't understand why prostitution is illegal. Selling is legal, fucking is legal. So,
why isn't it legal to sell fucking? Why should it be illegal to sell something that's
legal to give away? I can't follow the logic.
--George Carlin
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.
User: "John D. Wentzky"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 11:30:14 PM
"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:46e9efaf$0$17089$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

John D. Wentzky wrote:

"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote:

John D. Wentzky wrote:

When, *****?
Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and
children, and bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he
cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)
For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter
against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
(Matthew 10:35)
Any other questions?


Failure on your part to provide proof observed.


Aww... How cute!

Wentzky wants to deride any part of the Bible that doesn't quote him
exactly.

I do not see the term "DEMAND" in the passage.
Too bad you are so illiterate.
.
User: "Dionisio"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 14 Sep 2007 08:05:32 PM
John D. Wentzky wrote:

"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote:

John D. Wentzky wrote:

"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote:

John D. Wentzky wrote:

When, *****?
Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"


If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and
children, and bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he
cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)
For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter
against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
(Matthew 10:35)
Any other questions?

Failure on your part to provide proof observed.

Aww... How cute!
Wentzky wants to deride any part of the Bible that doesn't quote him
exactly.


I do not see the term "DEMAND" in the passage.

And there's the proof!
Thanks for playing! I'd offer a booby prize, but nobody seems willing to donate their
boobies...
Ah, well, that's probably for the best.
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
--Piet Hein
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.




User: "osprey"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 15 Sep 2007 01:44:07 AM
On Sep 13, 8:30 pm, Dionisio <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

John D. Wentzky wrote:

When, *****?
Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"


If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)

For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew 10:35)

Any other questions?

Yea, why don't you actually learn what the bible is saying?
http://www.tektonics.org/gk/jesussayshate.html
Skeptics who really want to give Jesus a black eye are fond of quoting
this verse, Luke 14:26:
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also,
he cannot be my disciple.
The subject here is the word for hate, which is the Greek miseo. Dan
Barker is typical of critics when he writes:
Most Christians feel obligated to soften the face meaning of the word
'hate' to something like 'love less than me,' even though the Greek
word miseo means 'hate.'
In line with this comment, skeptics will stress the meaning of the
word "hate" and insist that the word must be read literally, and that
Jesus is truly preaching hate. But in fact, the "softening" is correct
to do -- and is perfectly in line with the context of the ancient
world, and the Jewish culture in particular.
For a background on the use of extreme and hyperbolic language in the
Bible, I direct the reader first to my foundational essay on this
subject. Abraham Rihbany (The Syrian Christ, 98f) points to the use of
"hate" in the Bible as an example of linguistic extreme in an Eastern
culture. There is no word, he notes, for "like" in the Arabic tongue.
"...[T]o us Orientals the only word which can express and cordial
inclination of approval is 'love'." The word is used even of casual
acquaintances. Extreme language is used to express even moderate
relationships.
Luke 14:26 falls into a category of "extreme language," the language
of absoluteness used to express a preference, and may refer to
disattachment, indifference, or nonattachment without any feelings of
revulsion involved. To seal this matter completely, let's look at some
parallel materials which prove our point. The closest example comes
from Genesis 29:30-1:
And he went in also unto Rachel, and he loved also Rachel more than
Leah, and served with him yet seven other years. And when the LORD saw
that Leah was hated, he opened her womb: but Rachel was barren.
Here, "hated" is clearly used synonymously with one who is loved less.
Let it be added that if Jacob hated Leah in a literal way, it is
hardly believable that he would consent to take her as his wife at
all! (See also Judges 14:16 and Deut. 21:15-17.)
Now here is another example from Jesus, Luke 16:13:
No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and
love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the
other.
Such extremes of feeling would be atypical, but the extremes are not
meant to be taken literally; the point is that one master will get
more dedicated labor than the other. Now let's move into some secular
works with the same sort of hyperbolic language. Fitzmeyer's Lukan
commentary offers this example from Poimandes 4:6:
If you do not hate your body first, O child, you will not be able to
love yourself.
Would critics suppose that this teaches literal hatred of the physical
body? It does not -- it emphasizes the need to give preference to the
whole self before the body alone. Literal hate of the body would have
us cutting it with razors or hitting it with blunt objects -- an
extreme practiced in some Eastern faiths, but not among the Greeks!
Here is another example from a war song in the Poetae Lyrici Graeci
(see James Denney, "The Word 'Hate' in Lk. 14:26," Expository Times
21, 41-42): it is said that in battle, men "must count his own life
his enemy for the honor of Sparta" -- is this a literal hatred of
one's own life being taught? No! It is emphasizing the need to make
one's life secondary for Sparta's sake. Here's a final example from
Epictetus 3.3.5: "The good is preferable to every intimate relation."
This is just a more abstract version of Luke 14:26!
Bottom line -- skeptics who think that Jesus is preaching literal and
misogynist hate in this verse are doing no more than the usual --
thinking out of time, out of mind with the text, and in some cases
(like Barker and C. Dennis McKinsey) letting their own "hate" get in
the way of reading the text any way other than with wooden literalism.
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 15 Sep 2007 12:06:23 PM
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

On Sep 13, 8:30 pm, Dionisio <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

John D. Wentzky wrote:

When, *****?
Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"


If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)

For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew 10:35)

Any other questions?


Yea, why don't you actually learn what the bible is saying?


http://www.tektonics.org/gk/jesussayshate.html

Skeptics who really want to give Jesus a black eye are fond of quoting
this verse, Luke 14:26:

If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also,
he cannot be my disciple.
The subject here is the word for hate, which is the Greek miseo. Dan
Barker is typical of critics when he writes:

Most Christians feel obligated to soften the face meaning of the word
'hate' to something like 'love less than me,' even though the Greek
word miseo means 'hate.'
In line with this comment, skeptics will stress the meaning of the
word "hate" and insist that the word must be read literally, and that
Jesus is truly preaching hate. But in fact, the "softening" is correct
to do -- and is perfectly in line with the context of the ancient
world, and the Jewish culture in particular.

In short, literalists are wrong.
Which means, of course, that the literalists are also wrong when they
use the Bible to attack other people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "Dionisio"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 15 Sep 2007 01:40:39 PM
osprey wrote:

Dionisio <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)

For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew 10:35)

Any other questions?


Yea, why don't you actually learn what the bible is saying?

Is this another one of those "you need the Holy Spirit to interpret the Bible" posts?
Sorry, but if the deity is billed as omnipotent and all-knowing, then one presumes that He
can speak the language precisely and distinctly; Without the need of a translator,
interpreter, or other methodology which would indicate -- by its very use -- that He was
less than competent at expressing Himself.
Golly. Holding God to a higher standard. What could be more blasphemous?
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
Thank you for your interest in HoroscopesForTheParanoid.com.
You selected, "Tell me my immediate future," as your free trial horoscope.
We see the following:
"Today you will have the eerie sensation that either you are going crazy or you are being
watched by something indescribably evil. Luckily for you, you're in fine shape, mentally."
This glimpse into the future has been brought to you free of charge.
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.
User: "Osprey"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 15 Sep 2007 01:45:32 PM
"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:46ec2725$0$32496$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

osprey wrote:

Dionisio <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and
children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my
disciple. (Luke 14:26)

For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter
against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew
10:35)

Any other questions?


Yea, why don't you actually learn what the bible is saying?


Is this another one of those "you need the Holy Spirit to interpret the
Bible" posts? Sorry, but if the deity is billed as omnipotent and
all-knowing, then one presumes that He can speak the language precisely
and distinctly; Without the need of a translator, interpreter, or other
methodology which would indicate -- by its very use -- that He was less
than competent at expressing Himself.

Golly. Holding God to a higher standard. What could be more blasphemous?

The problem is this:
Most atheist, know that the argument that God doesn't exist is an argument
they can't win.
They attack the bible and most often pick and choose the verses they wish to
exploit or distort, most often times not even knowing what they are talking
about.
I have met a few atheist that do know the bible very well, in fact they
probably know it in regards to what it says, better than most theist;
however, they still lack the knowledge on it's meaning, it's origin, who
actually wrote it and why.
a) God did not write the bible
b) The bible was written over a very long period of time, most of the
authors of each book never knew each other..yet, most write very similiar
occurences.
c) The bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, and in those times many of the
words, if not all of them, held different meanings.
d) Over the years, man has re-written or re-translated the bible.
So, we can't actually know if what we are reading in the bible is 100% of
it's original writings on scrolls and/or tablets.
The verses you are trying to use and distort, do not mean what you are
trying to imply.
That was my point.
I'm not a biblical scholar, but at least I know better than to take it at
face value and to go do some research on what I'm reading.
.
User: "Smiler"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 15 Sep 2007 07:30:47 PM
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:SNudnTV_UI7StXHbnZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@comcast.com...


"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:46ec2725$0$32496$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

osprey wrote:

Dionisio <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife, and
children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my
disciple. (Luke 14:26)

For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter
against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew
10:35)

Any other questions?


Yea, why don't you actually learn what the bible is saying?


Is this another one of those "you need the Holy Spirit to interpret the
Bible" posts? Sorry, but if the deity is billed as omnipotent and
all-knowing, then one presumes that He can speak the language precisely
and distinctly; Without the need of a translator, interpreter, or other
methodology which would indicate -- by its very use -- that He was less
than competent at expressing Himself.

Golly. Holding God to a higher standard. What could be more blasphemous?


The problem is this:

Most atheist, know that the argument that God doesn't exist is an argument
they can't win.
They attack the bible and most often pick and choose the verses they wish
to exploit or distort, most often times not even knowing what they are
talking about.
I have met a few atheist that do know the bible very well, in fact they
probably know it in regards to what it says, better than most theist;
however, they still lack the knowledge on it's meaning, it's origin, who
actually wrote it and why.

a) God did not write the bible

All the fundies who knock on my door insist that god wrote the bible and
that proves god exists!
If god didn't write the bible, that proves that god doesn't exist, according
to them.
I don't need any such proof. To me, there are no gods.

b) The bible was written over a very long period of time, most of the
authors of each book never knew each other..yet, most write very similiar
occurences.
c) The bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, and in those times many of
the words, if not all of them, held different meanings.
d) Over the years, man has re-written or re-translated the bible.

So, we can't actually know if what we are reading in the bible is 100% of
it's original writings on scrolls and/or tablets.

So why do you believe in stories told in a book that's so distorted from the
original that they have no meaning?
Even the originals, if they were ever found, would have no meaning. Some of
the stories were written down hundreds of years after the supposed events.
In the intervening time, they were handed down using oral tradition and
were, therefore, open to error, omission, mishearing, misremembering and
deliberate change.
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
User: "Osprey"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 16 Sep 2007 07:51:46 AM
"Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com> wrote in message
news:XO_Gi.790$X%4.723@newsfe4-win.ntli.net...


"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:SNudnTV_UI7StXHbnZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@comcast.com...


"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:46ec2725$0$32496$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

osprey wrote:

Dionisio <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife,
and children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my
disciple. (Luke 14:26)

For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew
10:35)

Any other questions?


Yea, why don't you actually learn what the bible is saying?


Is this another one of those "you need the Holy Spirit to interpret the
Bible" posts? Sorry, but if the deity is billed as omnipotent and
all-knowing, then one presumes that He can speak the language precisely
and distinctly; Without the need of a translator, interpreter, or other
methodology which would indicate -- by its very use -- that He was less
than competent at expressing Himself.

Golly. Holding God to a higher standard. What could be more blasphemous?


The problem is this:

Most atheist, know that the argument that God doesn't exist is an
argument they can't win.
They attack the bible and most often pick and choose the verses they wish
to exploit or distort, most often times not even knowing what they are
talking about.
I have met a few atheist that do know the bible very well, in fact they
probably know it in regards to what it says, better than most theist;
however, they still lack the knowledge on it's meaning, it's origin, who
actually wrote it and why.

a) God did not write the bible


All the fundies who knock on my door insist that god wrote the bible and
that proves god exists!
If god didn't write the bible, that proves that god doesn't exist,
according to them.
I don't need any such proof. To me, there are no gods.

O.k., that's "to you" then. So be it.


b) The bible was written over a very long period of time, most of the
authors of each book never knew each other..yet, most write very similiar
occurences.
c) The bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, and in those times many of
the words, if not all of them, held different meanings.
d) Over the years, man has re-written or re-translated the bible.

So, we can't actually know if what we are reading in the bible is 100% of
it's original writings on scrolls and/or tablets.


So why do you believe in stories told in a book that's so distorted from
the original that they have no meaning?

Who said I believe all of the stories?

Even the originals, if they were ever found, would have no meaning. Some
of the stories were written down hundreds of years after the supposed
events. In the intervening time, they were handed down using oral
tradition and were, therefore, open to error, omission, mishearing,
misremembering and deliberate change.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279

.
User: "Smiler"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 16 Sep 2007 07:17:06 PM
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:QdGdnWQaJ9J4u3DbnZ2dnUVZ_sqinZ2d@comcast.com...


"Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com> wrote in message
news:XO_Gi.790$X%4.723@newsfe4-win.ntli.net...


"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:SNudnTV_UI7StXHbnZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@comcast.com...


"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:46ec2725$0$32496$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

osprey wrote:

Dionisio <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife,
and children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my
disciple. (Luke 14:26)

For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew
10:35)

Any other questions?


Yea, why don't you actually learn what the bible is saying?


Is this another one of those "you need the Holy Spirit to interpret the
Bible" posts? Sorry, but if the deity is billed as omnipotent and
all-knowing, then one presumes that He can speak the language precisely
and distinctly; Without the need of a translator, interpreter, or other
methodology which would indicate -- by its very use -- that He was less
than competent at expressing Himself.

Golly. Holding God to a higher standard. What could be more
blasphemous?


The problem is this:

Most atheist, know that the argument that God doesn't exist is an
argument they can't win.
They attack the bible and most often pick and choose the verses they
wish to exploit or distort, most often times not even knowing what they
are talking about.
I have met a few atheist that do know the bible very well, in fact they
probably know it in regards to what it says, better than most theist;
however, they still lack the knowledge on it's meaning, it's origin, who
actually wrote it and why.

a) God did not write the bible


All the fundies who knock on my door insist that god wrote the bible and
that proves god exists!
If god didn't write the bible, that proves that god doesn't exist,
according to them.
I don't need any such proof. To me, there are no gods.


O.k., that's "to you" then. So be it.


b) The bible was written over a very long period of time, most of the
authors of each book never knew each other..yet, most write very
similiar occurences.
c) The bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, and in those times many of
the words, if not all of them, held different meanings.
d) Over the years, man has re-written or re-translated the bible.

So, we can't actually know if what we are reading in the bible is 100%
of it's original writings on scrolls and/or tablets.


So why do you believe in stories told in a book that's so distorted from
the original that they have no meaning?


Who said I believe all of the stories?

Do you see the word "all" in what I wrote above?
You believe in at least some of those distorted and meaningless stories,
otherwise you wouldn't be a Xian.
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 17 Sep 2007 12:38:45 AM
On Sep 16, 8:17 pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:

"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote in message

news:QdGdnWQaJ9J4u3DbnZ2dnUVZ_sqinZ2d@comcast.com...







"Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote in message
news:XO_Gi.790$X%4.723@newsfe4-win.ntli.net...


"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote in message
news:SNudnTV_UI7StXHbnZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@comcast.com...


"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:46ec2725$0$32496$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

osprey wrote:

Dionisio <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife,
and children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my
disciple. (Luke 14:26)


For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew
10:35)


Any other questions?


Yea, why don't you actually learn what the bible is saying?


Is this another one of those "you need the Holy Spirit to interpret the
Bible" posts? Sorry, but if the deity is billed as omnipotent and
all-knowing, then one presumes that He can speak the language precisely
and distinctly; Without the need of a translator, interpreter, or other
methodology which would indicate -- by its very use -- that He was less
than competent at expressing Himself.


Golly. Holding God to a higher standard. What could be more
blasphemous?


The problem is this:


Most atheist, know that the argument that God doesn't exist is an
argument they can't win.
They attack the bible and most often pick and choose the verses they
wish to exploit or distort, most often times not even knowing what they
are talking about.
I have met a few atheist that do know the bible very well, in fact they
probably know it in regards to what it says, better than most theist;
however, they still lack the knowledge on it's meaning, it's origin, who
actually wrote it and why.


a) God did not write the bible


All the fundies who knock on my door insist that god wrote the bible and
that proves god exists!
If god didn't write the bible, that proves that god doesn't exist,
according to them.
I don't need any such proof. To me, there are no gods.


O.k., that's "to you" then. So be it.


b) The bible was written over a very long period of time, most of the
authors of each book never knew each other..yet, most write very
similiar occurences.
c) The bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, and in those times many of
the words, if not all of them, held different meanings.
d) Over the years, man has re-written or re-translated the bible.


So, we can't actually know if what we are reading in the bible is 100%
of it's original writings on scrolls and/or tablets.


So why do you believe in stories told in a book that's so distorted from
the original that they have no meaning?


Who said I believe all of the stories?


Do you see the word "all" in what I wrote above?
You believe in at least some of those distorted and meaningless stories,

That's YOUR opinion that they are distorted and meaningless.
I believe, and yes Archieologist are uncovering more and more things
today that support some of the stories, that a lot of the bible is
written accounts of things that actually did happen.
Problem is, many atheist, don't know how to read the bible and they
get it wrong.
Just like the story of the flood. There is evidence of a great flood.
World-wide? Probabably not, but there is evidence of a great flood
that took place around that time period.
When the bible was written, the stories passed down generation from
generation, it probably did appear at that time to be a "world-wide"
flood.
The story of Saddam and Gomorrah, Archieologist have found evidence
that this place did actually exist and there is evidence of a major
disastor that supports the biblical accounts of a massive fire and
death.

otherwise you wouldn't be a Xian.

That's nothing more than a demonstration of your own bigotry and
ignorance.
You don't understand the bible at all, and often times you get it
wrong..
otherwise you wouldn't be an atheist
.
User: "Smiler"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 17 Sep 2007 07:55:15 PM
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1190007525.477004.294700@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 16, 8:17 pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:

"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote in message

news:QdGdnWQaJ9J4u3DbnZ2dnUVZ_sqinZ2d@comcast.com...







"Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote in message
news:XO_Gi.790$X%4.723@newsfe4-win.ntli.net...


"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote in message
news:SNudnTV_UI7StXHbnZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@comcast.com...


"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:46ec2725$0$32496$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

osprey wrote:

Dionisio <moc-rr-thgi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and
wife,
and children, and
bretheren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my
disciple. (Luke 14:26)


For I come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her
mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Matthew
10:35)


Any other questions?


Yea, why don't you actually learn what the bible is saying?


Is this another one of those "you need the Holy Spirit to interpret
the
Bible" posts? Sorry, but if the deity is billed as omnipotent and
all-knowing, then one presumes that He can speak the language
precisely
and distinctly; Without the need of a translator, interpreter, or
other
methodology which would indicate -- by its very use -- that He was
less
than competent at expressing Himself.


Golly. Holding God to a higher standard. What could be more
blasphemous?


The problem is this:


Most atheist, know that the argument that God doesn't exist is an
argument they can't win.
They attack the bible and most often pick and choose the verses they
wish to exploit or distort, most often times not even knowing what
they
are talking about.
I have met a few atheist that do know the bible very well, in fact
they
probably know it in regards to what it says, better than most theist;
however, they still lack the knowledge on it's meaning, it's origin,
who
actually wrote it and why.


a) God did not write the bible


All the fundies who knock on my door insist that god wrote the bible
and
that proves god exists!
If god didn't write the bible, that proves that god doesn't exist,
according to them.
I don't need any such proof. To me, there are no gods.


O.k., that's "to you" then. So be it.


b) The bible was written over a very long period of time, most of the
authors of each book never knew each other..yet, most write very
similiar occurences.
c) The bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, and in those times many
of
the words, if not all of them, held different meanings.
d) Over the years, man has re-written or re-translated the bible.


So, we can't actually know if what we are reading in the bible is
100%
of it's original writings on scrolls and/or tablets.


So why do you believe in stories told in a book that's so distorted
from
the original that they have no meaning?


Who said I believe all of the stories?


Do you see the word "all" in what I wrote above?
You believe in at least some of those distorted and meaningless stories,


That's YOUR opinion that they are distorted and meaningless.

No. That's what you said above.
"a) God did not write the bible.
b) The bible was written over a very long period of time, most of the
authors of each book never knew each other..yet, most write very
similiar occurences.
c) The bible was written in Hebrew and Greek, and in those times many of
the words, if not all of them, held different meanings.
d) Over the years, man has re-written or re-translated the bible."
Seems to me you're saying they've become distorted and meaningless.


I believe, and yes Archieologist are uncovering more and more things
today that support some of the stories, that a lot of the bible is
written accounts of things that actually did happen.

In a couple of millenia, archeologists might uncover the remains of Kings
Cross station in London and people will believe that shows that Harry Potter
really did exist.

Problem is, many atheist, don't know how to read the bible and they
get it wrong.

The only way I know how to read is for comprehension.
I start at the top, left-hand corner and read left to right until I get to
the end of the line.
I then start again at the left hand end of the next line. Is there any other
way to read English?
I forgot. You read it through 'god' tinted spectacles.

Just like the story of the flood. There is evidence of a great flood.
World-wide? Probabably not,

Definitely not.

but there is evidence of a great flood

You misspelt 'local'.

that took place around that time period.

Would a flood local to the middle-east cause the Grand Canyon or kill off
all the dinosaurs in the world?

When the bible was written, the stories passed down generation from
generation, it probably did appear at that time to be a "world-wide"
flood.

ITYM Before the bible was written, the stories were passed down from
generation to generation.
This oral tradition was open to deliberate change, miss-remembering,
miss-hearing, error and ommission.
The stories became so distorted from the original that they no longer have
any meaning.

The story of Saddam

A nasty dictator of Iraq who was overthrown by an invasion and hanged by his
own people.

and Gomorrah,

ITYM Sodom & Gemorrah.
BTW. I know what sodomy is, but what is gemorrahy?

Archieologist

Who's this Archie Ologist?

have found evidence
that this place did actually exist and there is evidence of a major
disastor that supports the biblical accounts of a massive fire and
death.

They may have existed and they may have been destroyed in a major disaster,
but how does that prove that goddidit?


otherwise you wouldn't be a Xian.



That's nothing more than a demonstration of your own bigotry and
ignorance.

I point out that you must believe in some of the bible, otherwise you
wouldn't be a Xian and you call that bigotry and ignorance?
I'd say it was an obvious fact. If you didn't believe in the bible at all,
you'd be a follower of one of the many other religions of the world or an
atheist. Or are you saying you're a xian who doesn't believe in _any_ of
the bible?

You don't understand the bible at all, and often times you get it
wrong..

No. We actually read and understand what it says.
We don't read it wearing 'god' tinted spectacles.
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.




User: "Dionisio"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 16 Sep 2007 02:06:09 PM
Smiler wrote:

Even the originals, if they were ever found, would have no meaning. Some of
the stories were written down hundreds of years after the supposed events.
In the intervening time, they were handed down using oral tradition and
were, therefore, open to error, omission, mishearing, misremembering and
deliberate change.

Amusingly, the Bible acknowledges this. The law of God has been perverted by scribes
(Jeremiah 8:8)
And then there are the parts -- yep, plural -- where God Himself participates in the fun:
God says that He intentionally gives bad laws. (Ezekiel 20:25; 2 Thessalonians 2:11) God
causes others to lie (1 Kings 22:23; 2 Chronicles 18:22; Jeremiah 4:10, 20:7; Ezekiel 14:9)
Happy, happy, joy, joy!
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
I worry that our lives are like soap operas. We can go for months and not tune in to them,
then six months later we look in and the same stuff is still going on.
--Jane Wagner
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.


User: "Dionisio"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 15 Sep 2007 04:48:50 PM
Osprey wrote:

Most atheist, know that the argument that God doesn't exist is an
argument they can't win.

We also can't prove that unicorns don't exist. That ghosts don't exist. That Santa doesn't
exist. etc...
But since theists can't prove that their all-knowing, all-powerful, omnipresent
micromanaging God exists -- because, ever-so-conveniently, He won't show Himself -- I
consider it a moot point.
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
If you speak insults, you will also hear them.
-- Latin proverb
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.





User: "Budikka666"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 06:51:49 PM
On Sep 13, 6:31 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:

"Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message

news:1189675851.369744.108030@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...



On Sep 12, 11:50 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message


news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...


Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?


Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in government and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually have
children and parents?
What have these idiots against their own parents?
Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.


Hatred of one's parents is what Jesus demanded.


When, *****?

Read your fucking myth-filled Bible, you ignorant, hate-sodden
*****. Where do we even begin to start educating cowardly,
hypocritical scum like you? How about in your own Bible, in the New
Testament, in the book of Luke?
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also,
he cannot be my disciple." (Lu 14:26)
And here he tells you you must hate everything else if you're too
follow him: "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the
one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise
the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." (Ma 6:24)
Here he tells of the hatred his appearance will bring into the world:
"And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and
shall hate one another." (Ma 24:10)

Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"

Obviously you need to read your fucking Bible a lot more before you
open your stupid *****-hole of a mouth you pathetic little *****-wipe.
Now go ***** yourself and the god you rode in on.
Budikka
.
User: "John D. Wentzky"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 07:43:49 PM
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1189727509.773646.295620@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 13, 6:31 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:

"Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message

news:1189675851.369744.108030@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...



On Sep 12, 11:50 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message


news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...


Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?


Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in government
and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually have
children and parents?
What have these idiots against their own parents?
Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love
their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.


Hatred of one's parents is what Jesus demanded.


When, *****?


Read your fucking myth-filled Bible,

Already read it.

you ignorant, hate-sodden
*****.

Looking in a mirror?

Where do we even begin to start educating cowardly,
hypocritical scum like you?

With you playing the 'get out' thing by getting out.

How about in your own Bible, in the New
Testament, in the book of Luke?

You looked it up for the first time?
Maybe you should read it a few times until you understand it.

"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also,
he cannot be my disciple." (Lu 14:26)

So, why haven't you done that yet, or is that your excuse for being an
abortionist homosexual ***** who thought that passage meant to violate the
laws of Moses?
LOL!
HAHAHHAAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAH!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH!
You're damned, you fool.

And here he tells you you must hate everything else if you're too
follow him: "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the
one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise
the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." (Ma 6:24)

Why do you try to do that so often then?
Why are you so unstable that you can't figure who to serve?

Here he tells of the hatred his appearance will bring into the world:
"And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and
shall hate one another." (Ma 24:10)

Is that why you are so freagin' hatefilled toward anyone who trusts him and
the testament in revelation concerning your id?

Where does it say, "I DEMAND THAT A PERSON HATE HIS PARENTS!"


Obviously you need to read your fucking Bible a lot more before you
open your stupid *****-hole of a mouth you pathetic little *****-wipe.

OBVIOUSLY, you are incapable of admitting to your personal defects in your
lack of verbatim references to things you thin can save you in our personal
deceoption ***** alliance.

Now go ***** yourself and the god you rode in on.

You lost.
You can't command anyone any more.
Remember?
.
User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 08:54:36 PM
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:aPkGi.42544$wN3.23962@bignews2.bellsouth.net...

"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1189727509.773646.295620@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 13, 6:31 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:

"Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message

news:1189675851.369744.108030@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...



On Sep 12, 11:50 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message


news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...


Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?


Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in government
and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually have
children and parents?
What have these idiots against their own parents?
Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love
their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.


Hatred of one's parents is what Jesus demanded.


When, *****?


Read your fucking myth-filled Bible,


Already read it.

you ignorant, hate-sodden
*****.


Looking in a mirror?

Where do we even begin to start educating cowardly,
hypocritical scum like you?


With you playing the 'get out' thing by getting out.

How about in your own Bible, in the New
Testament, in the book of Luke?


You looked it up for the first time?
Maybe you should read it a few times until you understand it.

"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also,
he cannot be my disciple." (Lu 14:26)


So, why haven't you done that yet,

The question is, why haven't you Christians obeyed the clear directive from
Christ? Non-Christians are not subject to the whims of your imaginary
Christ-on-a-Crutch.
.
User: "John D. Wentzky"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 09:21:52 PM
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:13ejqess5g268cf@corp.supernews.com...


"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:aPkGi.42544$wN3.23962@bignews2.bellsouth.net...

"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1189727509.773646.295620@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 13, 6:31 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:

"Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message

news:1189675851.369744.108030@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...



On Sep 12, 11:50 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message


news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...


Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?


Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in government
and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually
have
children and parents?
What have these idiots against their own parents?
Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love
their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.


Hatred of one's parents is what Jesus demanded.


When, *****?


Read your fucking myth-filled Bible,


Already read it.

you ignorant, hate-sodden
*****.


Looking in a mirror?

Where do we even begin to start educating cowardly,
hypocritical scum like you?


With you playing the 'get out' thing by getting out.

How about in your own Bible, in the New
Testament, in the book of Luke?


You looked it up for the first time?
Maybe you should read it a few times until you understand it.

"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also,
he cannot be my disciple." (Lu 14:26)


So, why haven't you done that yet,


The question is, why haven't you Christians obeyed the clear directive
from Christ?

You lost.
You presented the information.
You are burdened with answering the question.

Non-Christians are not subject to the whims of your imaginary
Christ-on-a-Crutch.

Now, you really lost.
When you preach the Bible you automatically become subject to it.
Your satanist ploy that seeks to docilize the flock of Christ while you
blatantly admit that you are at war against it is the truth that seals your
agenda's doom.
.
User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 09:28:37 PM
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:IcmGi.59038$t9.49353@bignews7.bellsouth.net...

"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:13ejqess5g268cf@corp.supernews.com...


"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:aPkGi.42544$wN3.23962@bignews2.bellsouth.net...

"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1189727509.773646.295620@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 13, 6:31 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:

"Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message

news:1189675851.369744.108030@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...



On Sep 12, 11:50 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message


news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...


Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion when
discussing the gay political agenda?


Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in
government and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually
have
children and parents?
What have these idiots against their own parents?
Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their
own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love
their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.


Hatred of one's parents is what Jesus demanded.


When, *****?


Read your fucking myth-filled Bible,


Already read it.

you ignorant, hate-sodden
*****.


Looking in a mirror?

Where do we even begin to start educating cowardly,
hypocritical scum like you?


With you playing the 'get out' thing by getting out.

How about in your own Bible, in the New
Testament, in the book of Luke?


You looked it up for the first time?
Maybe you should read it a few times until you understand it.

"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also,
he cannot be my disciple." (Lu 14:26)


So, why haven't you done that yet,


The question is, why haven't you Christians obeyed the clear directive
from Christ?


You lost.

Nope, I never lose.

You presented the information.
You are burdened with answering the question.

Nope, I am not subject to the dictates of your imaginary savior. As a
follower, you are.


Non-Christians are not subject to the whims of your imaginary
Christ-on-a-Crutch.


Now, you really lost.

Nope, it is not possible for me to lose.

When you preach the Bible

I was not preaching the bible, merely quoting from it. Or rather, the
previous poster was quoting from it. If you quote from Shakespear, do you
imagine that you are preaching Shakespear?

you automatically become subject to it.

Nope, not even in the slightest.

Your satanist

Hmmm... First you accuse me of preaching your bible, then you accuse me of
being a satanist? You are one really confused village idiot.

ploy that seeks to docilize the flock of Christ while you

As I recall, only the meek shall inherit the Earth, and another word for
meek is docile, correct?

blatantly admit that you are at war against it is the truth

LOL! You don't know the truth.

that seals your agenda's doom.

My agenda is the truth, so you're saying that the truth is doomed?
.
User: "John D. Wentzky"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded 13 Sep 2007 11:26:57 PM
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:13ejsf0o9f5t81e@corp.supernews.com...


"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:IcmGi.59038$t9.49353@bignews7.bellsouth.net...

"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:13ejqess5g268cf@corp.supernews.com...


"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:aPkGi.42544$wN3.23962@bignews2.bellsouth.net...

"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1189727509.773646.295620@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 13, 6:31 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:

"Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message

news:1189675851.369744.108030@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...



On Sep 12, 11:50 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message


news:1189615320.598121.275400@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...


Is there any wonder why normal, decent people feel revulsion
when
discussing the gay political agenda?


Are you surpirsed when so many pro-chocie assholes are in
government and
schools there who are constantly saddened by people who actually
have
children and parents?
What have these idiots against their own parents?
Do you mean to say that CA now employs only those who hate their
own
parents?
And, to think they are the people who decry all those who do love
their
parents and families as hatefilled intolerant bigots.


Hatred of one's parents is what Jesus demanded.


When, *****?


Read your fucking myth-filled Bible,


Already read it.

you ignorant, hate-sodden
*****.


Looking in a mirror?

Where do we even begin to start educating cowardly,
hypocritical scum like you?


With you playing the 'get out' thing by getting out.

How about in your own Bible, in the New
Testament, in the book of Luke?


You looked it up for the first time?
Maybe you should read it a few times until you understand it.

"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also,
he cannot be my disciple." (Lu 14:26)


So, why haven't you done that yet,


The question is, why haven't you Christians obeyed the clear directive
from Christ?


You lost.


Nope, I never lose.

You lost. I said it.
That makes it a true statement.

You presented the information.
You are burdened with answering the question.


Nope,

It's going to slam you underneath it since you preached it and are blatanlty
refusing to obey it..

I am not subject to the dictates of your imaginary savior. As a follower,
you are.

Again, you commit the error of disqualified teaching.
You are not entitled to present that which you do not adhere to yourself.


Non-Christians are not subject to the whims of your imaginary
Christ-on-a-Crutch.


Now, you really lost.


Nope, it is not possible for me to lose.

It has already occurred.

When you preach the Bible



I was not preaching the bible, merely quoting from it.

*****, you liar.
You presented it as teaching to persons ou suppose are Christians.
That means that you are now subjected to that teaching.
You lost your atheistic exemption from the teaching you presented.
Christ can make you conform to that which you teach.
Too bad you are too idiotic to realize what you did.

Or rather, the previous poster was quoting from it.

You agreed with that poster, correct?

If you quote from Shakespear, do you imagine that you are preaching
Shakespear?

You wouldn't?

you automatically become subject to it.


Nope, not even in the slightest.

Ridiculous.

Your satanist


Hmmm... First you accuse me of preaching your bible, then you accuse me
of being a satanist?

Surely enough.

You are one really confused village idiot.

You are a hypocrite and you presented information as if you are not subject
to it whiel asserting that all Christians must be against their own
families.
You *ARE* pro-choice, too.
You are untrustworthy.

ploy that seeks to docilize the flock of Christ while you


As I recall, only the meek shall inherit the Earth, and another word for
meek is docile, correct?

What did God say about Moses who said that there was no one more humble than
Moses?

blatantly admit that you are at war against it is the truth


LOL! You don't know the truth.

That you aren't in agreement with the teachings you command others to obey
as you say that you are exempt from them?

that seals your agenda's doom.


My agenda is the truth, so you're saying that the truth is doomed?

What truth can any hypocrite posses?
.
User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch"

Title: Re: Hatred of 'Mom' and 'Dad' is What Jesus demanded