Science > Abortion > More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Ray Fischer" |
| Date: |
22 Sep 2006 09:40:08 PM |
| Object: |
More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Islamic trash, but liberals would rather blame Bush than the garbage responsible for 9/11 |
22 Sep 2006 10:14:01 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:45149e88$0$34528$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Nobody gives a damn about the 100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis; least of all
the scum who subjected these people to this American re-action to an
unprovoked attack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of American trash, but neocns would rather kill ALL Muslims |
22 Sep 2006 11:55:50 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
Nobody gives a damn about the 100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis;
Murderous *****.
least of all
the scum who subjected these people to this American re-action to an
unprovoked attack.
The invasion of Iraq was an unprovoked attack, you stinking bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Miles" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Islamic trash, but liberals wouldrather blame Bush than the garbage responsible for 9/11 |
23 Sep 2006 03:56:08 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:45149e88$0$34528$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Nobody gives a damn about the 100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis; least of all
the scum who subjected these people to this American re-action to an
unprovoked attack.
Unprovoked! Hah!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Islamic trash, but liberals would rather blame Bush than the garbage responsible for 9/11 |
29 Sep 2006 10:28:55 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Nobody gives a damn about the 100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis
I can assure you that there a great many people who most certainly do
care about them.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Islamic trash, but liberals would rather blame Bush than the garbage responsible for 9/11 |
29 Sep 2006 10:28:40 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Nobody gives a damn about the 100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis
I can assure you that there a many people who most certainly do care
about them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Islamic trash, but liberals would rather blame Bush than the garbage responsible for 9/11 |
29 Sep 2006 10:36:07 AM |
|
|
On 29 Sep 2006 08:28:40 -0700, wrote:
J Young wrote:
Nobody gives a damn about the 100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis
I can assure you that there a many people who most certainly do care
about them.
And I can assure you that 'J Young' is not one of them.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Islamic trash, but liberals would rather blame Bush than the garbage responsible for 9/11 |
26 Sep 2006 12:00:58 AM |
|
|
i am a radical muslim please read my blog.
http://www.xanga.com/hfghj23458654fgha
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
22 Sep 2006 11:51:14 PM |
|
|
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
Americans almost never count the lives of foreign nationals. It's
sad, but it's a fact.
.
|
|
|
| User: "si" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
23 Sep 2006 02:58:11 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 04:51:14 GMT, Al Smith <invalid@address.com>
wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
Americans almost never count the lives of foreign nationals. It's
sad, but it's a fact.
Except sometimes as a way of measuring their 'success' in battle
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
23 Sep 2006 01:33:45 PM |
|
|
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
Americans almost never count the lives of foreign nationals. It's
sad, but it's a fact.
Except sometimes as a way of measuring their 'success' in battle
The American military keeps tabs, but the "enemy" aren't human
beings to them, just numbers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "si" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
25 Sep 2006 05:07:54 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:33:45 GMT, Al Smith <invalid@address.com>
wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
Americans almost never count the lives of foreign nationals. It's
sad, but it's a fact.
Except sometimes as a way of measuring their 'success' in battle
The American military keeps tabs, but the "enemy" aren't human
beings to them, just numbers.
it makes it so easy to kill
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
23 Sep 2006 12:37:47 PM |
|
|
In article <45149e88$0$34528$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
what troubles me about that is that some usa citizens, although a
minority, are still arguing that bush's actions were partially
justified, rather than the insane actions of a despot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
23 Sep 2006 01:32:25 PM |
|
|
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
what troubles me about that is that some usa citizens, although a
minority, are still arguing that bush's actions were partially
justified, rather than the insane actions of a despot.
Bush has an approval rating in the low 30s. That means there were
thirty people in a hundred who actually support the jackass. Amazing!
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
23 Sep 2006 01:40:13 PM |
|
|
In article <Z4fRg.32957$cz3.15620@edtnps82>,
Al Smith <invalid@address.com> wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
what troubles me about that is that some usa citizens, although a
minority, are still arguing that bush's actions were partially
justified, rather than the insane actions of a despot.
Bush has an approval rating in the low 30s. That means there were
thirty people in a hundred who actually support the jackass. Amazing!
shows you what do many gop school budget cuts can do along with
control of the mainstream media.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
24 Sep 2006 11:13:57 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:32:25 GMT, Al Smith <invalid@address.com>
wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060923/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/911_times_two
what troubles me about that is that some usa citizens, although a
minority, are still arguing that bush's actions were partially
justified, rather than the insane actions of a despot.
Bush has an approval rating in the low 30s. That means there were
thirty people in a hundred who actually support the jackass. Amazing!
Old Honest Abe, was correct you can fool some of the people all the
time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark D J. Mark D" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
24 Sep 2006 10:32:18 AM |
|
|
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:gjbdh2tg4ff52gks3rftue4itt4grnd533@
Old Honest Abe, was correct you can fool some of the people all the
time.
....and as for the others, well, you just don't count their votes...
M.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
24 Sep 2006 09:23:02 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
Or the Lebanese (including lots of innocent children) recently
slaughtered
by our little friend/controller Israel.
I suspect you speak from a long history of being a Bush-hater, but
you're absolutely right. I had no problem with Georgie till he
bellyflopped
into Israel's pocket, then invaded Iraq. The man is every bit as
despicable
as Clinton; I think even more so if possible.
--------
THE ISRAEL LOBBY: Does it have too much influence on US foreign policy?
The London Review will be hosting a debate on 28 September in the Great
Hall, Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, Cooper
Square, New York. Go to the link in my sig to reserve tickets.
-----
Kill ratio of Palestinian children to Israeli children 5.7-to-1,
Israel's favor.
Kill ratio of all Palestinians to Israelis: over 3-to-1.
---------
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html
----------
"Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We,
the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."
---Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 2001
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
24 Sep 2006 12:11:45 PM |
|
|
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
Or the Lebanese (including lots of innocent children) recently
slaughtered
by our little friend/controller Israel.
I suspect you speak from a long history of being a Bush-hater, but
you're absolutely right.
The fanaticism of the American right-wing is neatly encapsulated by
the phrase "Bush hater". All of the corruption and incompetance of
Bush and his cronies is dismissed as being of no consequence by saying
instead that it's just a personal animosity towards Bush.
I had no problem with Georgie till he
bellyflopped
into Israel's pocket, then invaded Iraq. The man is every bit as
despicable
as Clinton; I think even more so if possible.
A glimmer, but you're still stuck with your neocon propaganda.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
24 Sep 2006 01:00:56 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
Or the Lebanese (including lots of innocent children) recently
slaughtered
by our little friend/controller Israel.
I suspect you speak from a long history of being a Bush-hater, but
you're absolutely right.
The fanaticism of the American right-wing is neatly encapsulated by
the phrase "Bush hater".
I'm not a right-winger, but a moderate. I'm also open-minded.
It's funny, some on USENET accuse me of being a liberal, and
here you are doing just the opposite.:) Amusing.
All of the corruption and incompetance of
Bush and his cronies is dismissed as being of no consequence by saying
instead that it's just a personal animosity towards Bush.
Bush and his cronies have proven themselves to be criminals, but so
are the Clintons. Would you ever admit that? Don't liberals always
try to claim how open-minded they are? You're biased like most people.
I had no problem with Georgie till he
bellyflopped
into Israel's pocket, then invaded Iraq. The man is every bit as
despicable
as Clinton; I think even more so if possible.
A glimmer, but you're still stuck with your neocon propaganda.
Me, a neocon???? LMAO! "Neocon" is simply a euphemism for
the Zionist Jews who are busy taking over the Republican party.
--------
THE ISRAEL LOBBY: Does it have too much influence on US foreign policy?
The London Review will be hosting a debate on 28 September in the Great
Hall, Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, Cooper
Square, New York. Go to the link in my sig to reserve tickets.
-----
Kill ratio of Palestinian children to Israeli children 5.7-to-1,
Israel's favor.
Kill ratio of all Palestinians to Israelis: over 3-to-1.
---------
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html
----------
"Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We,
the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."
---Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 2001
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
24 Sep 2006 10:30:56 PM |
|
|
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
Or the Lebanese (including lots of innocent children) recently
slaughtered
by our little friend/controller Israel.
I suspect you speak from a long history of being a Bush-hater, but
you're absolutely right.
The fanaticism of the American right-wing is neatly encapsulated by
the phrase "Bush hater".
I'm not a right-winger, but a moderate. I'm also open-minded.
So am I, and I manage not to use GOP propaganda like "Bush hater".
All of the corruption and incompetance of
Bush and his cronies is dismissed as being of no consequence by saying
instead that it's just a personal animosity towards Bush.
Bush and his cronies have proven themselves to be criminals, but so
are the Clintons.
More right-wing propaganda.
Would you ever admit that?
Name some crimes.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
24 Sep 2006 11:17:38 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
Or the Lebanese (including lots of innocent children) recently
slaughtered
by our little friend/controller Israel.
I suspect you speak from a long history of being a Bush-hater, but
you're absolutely right.
The fanaticism of the American right-wing is neatly encapsulated by
the phrase "Bush hater".
I'm not a right-winger, but a moderate. I'm also open-minded.
So am I, and I manage not to use GOP propaganda like "Bush hater".
All of the corruption and incompetance of
Bush and his cronies is dismissed as being of no consequence by saying
instead that it's just a personal animosity towards Bush.
Bush and his cronies have proven themselves to be criminals, but so
are the Clintons.
More right-wing propaganda.
Would you ever admit that?
Name some crimes.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
24 Sep 2006 11:44:51 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
Or the Lebanese (including lots of innocent children) recently
slaughtered
by our little friend/controller Israel.
I suspect you speak from a long history of being a Bush-hater, but
you're absolutely right.
The fanaticism of the American right-wing is neatly encapsulated by
the phrase "Bush hater".
I'm not a right-winger, but a moderate. I'm also open-minded.
So am I, and I manage not to use GOP propaganda like "Bush hater".
All of the corruption and incompetance of
Bush and his cronies is dismissed as being of no consequence by saying
instead that it's just a personal animosity towards Bush.
Bush and his cronies have proven themselves to be criminals, but so
are the Clintons.
More right-wing propaganda.
Would you ever admit that?
Name some crimes.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
What makes a "right-winger"? One who isn't duped into being a
"left-winger". What makes a right-winger seem so extreme to the
left-winger? It is because the left-winger is so far to the socialist
left that anything oppossing his goofy ideas seems to be extremely
remote. If a left-fielder plays ball right against the left wall even
center field could look like right field, thus causing the right field
to seem even more extreme. Of course, you know that but don't have the
courage to admit it. You are forced by your own pride / fear to play
ball with those who are PAID to brainwash poor naive souls. Go ahead,
believe the lies and pass them on, but some day you and those you love
will pay a terrible price when the dogs you're running with turn to
rend you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
25 Sep 2006 01:42:16 AM |
|
|
<buddwicker@earthlink.net> wrote:
buddwicker@earthlink.net wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more Americans
have died than were killed on 9/11. And that doesn't even count the
100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
Or the Lebanese (including lots of innocent children) recently
slaughtered
by our little friend/controller Israel.
I suspect you speak from a long history of being a Bush-hater, but
you're absolutely right.
The fanaticism of the American right-wing is neatly encapsulated by
the phrase "Bush hater".
I'm not a right-winger, but a moderate. I'm also open-minded.
So am I, and I manage not to use GOP propaganda like "Bush hater".
All of the corruption and incompetance of
Bush and his cronies is dismissed as being of no consequence by saying
instead that it's just a personal animosity towards Bush.
Bush and his cronies have proven themselves to be criminals, but so
are the Clintons.
More right-wing propaganda.
Would you ever admit that?
Name some crimes.
What makes a "right-winger"? One who isn't duped into being a
"left-winger". What makes a right-winger seem so extreme to the
left-winger? It is because the left-winger is so far to the socialist
left that anything oppossing his goofy ideas seems to be extremely
The usual political bigotry. All you do is parrot the hate fed to
you by right-wing sleazemongers. Meanwhile you end up poorer and the
rich get richer.
Sucker.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
25 Sep 2006 12:03:47 AM |
|
|
wrote in
news:1159159491.016824.314890@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<yerfriendcf@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Because of Bush's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, more
Americans have died than were killed on 9/11. And that
doesn't even count the 100,000+ Iraqi's and Afghanis killed.
Or the Lebanese (including lots of innocent children) recently
slaughtered
by our little friend/controller Israel.
I suspect you speak from a long history of being a Bush-hater,
but you're absolutely right.
The fanaticism of the American right-wing is neatly encapsulated
by the phrase "Bush hater".
I'm not a right-winger, but a moderate. I'm also open-minded.
So am I, and I manage not to use GOP propaganda like "Bush hater".
All of the corruption and incompetance of
Bush and his cronies is dismissed as being of no consequence by
saying instead that it's just a personal animosity towards Bush.
Bush and his cronies have proven themselves to be criminals, but
so are the Clintons.
More right-wing propaganda.
Would you ever admit that?
Name some crimes.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
What makes a "right-winger"? One who isn't duped into being a
"left-winger". What makes a right-winger seem so extreme to the
left-winger? It is because the left-winger is so far to the socialist
left that anything oppossing his goofy ideas seems to be extremely
remote. If a left-fielder plays ball right against the left wall even
center field could look like right field, thus causing the right field
to seem even more extreme. Of course, you know that but don't have the
courage to admit it. You are forced by your own pride / fear to play
ball with those who are PAID to brainwash poor naive souls. Go ahead,
believe the lies and pass them on, but some day you and those you love
will pay a terrible price when the dogs you're running with turn to
rend you.
It has been duly noted that you failed to name any crimes that you claim
Clinton committed, buttfloss.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark D J. Mark D" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
25 Sep 2006 04:19:34 PM |
|
|
"BOB" <sd@sd.net> wrote in message news:Xns9848E06A9B669SD@70.169.32.36...
buddwicker@earthlink.net wrote in
news:1159159491.016824.314890@d34g2000cwd
It has been duly noted that you failed to name any crimes that you claim
Clinton committed, buttfloss.
Yes. And it was *such an easy question*, too!
Answer: bombing the Sudanese al-Shifa pharmaceutical plant in 1998, with the
consequent loss of thousands of lives. If a 'terrorist' had perpetrated that
act, it would have been 'an outrage' that 'lived in infamy' for as long as
the compliant and corrupt US mass media were required to keep it there. And
if an 'enemy government' had done it, it would have been 'a heinous crime'
that scandalised 'the whole international community' and justified 'a swift
and harsh response'. But, as it was, it was just another act of violence by
just another American president. So it doesn't get so much as
*remembered* -- not even by *the people who claim to hate Clinton*. Because,
you see, much as these people 'hate Clinton', the fact is that *they love
their country's violence even more*...
M.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
25 Sep 2006 09:10:42 PM |
|
|
"Mark D J." <Mark D J.@hoyme.com> wrote in
news:GJXRg.33410$cx.10932@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net:
"BOB" <sd@sd.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9848E06A9B669SD@70.169.32.36...
buddwicker@earthlink.net wrote in
news:1159159491.016824.314890@d34g2000cwd
It has been duly noted that you failed to name any crimes that you
claim Clinton committed, buttfloss.
Yes. And it was *such an easy question*, too!
Answer: bombing the Sudanese al-Shifa pharmaceutical plant in 1998,
with the consequent loss of thousands of lives. If a 'terrorist' had
perpetrated that act, it would have been 'an outrage' that 'lived in
infamy' for as long as the compliant and corrupt US mass media were
required to keep it there. And if an 'enemy government' had done it,
it would have been 'a heinous crime' that scandalised 'the whole
international community' and justified 'a swift and harsh response'.
But, as it was, it was just another act of violence by just another
American president. So it doesn't get so much as *remembered* -- not
even by *the people who claim to hate Clinton*. Because, you see, much
as these people 'hate Clinton', the fact is that *they love their
country's violence even more*...
M.
If this was a "crime", where is the indictment?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark D J. Mark D" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
25 Sep 2006 11:39:37 PM |
|
|
"BOB" <sd@sd.net> wrote in message news:Xns9849C312FCB97SD@70.169.32.36...
"Mark D J." <Mark D J.@hoyme.com> wrote in
news:GJXRg.33410$cx.10932@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net:
"BOB" <sd@sd.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9848E06A9B669SD@70.169.32.36...
buddwicker@earthlink.net wrote in
news:1159159491.016824.314890@d34g2000cwd
It has been duly noted that you failed to name any crimes that you
claim Clinton committed, buttfloss.
Yes. And it was *such an easy question*, too!
Answer: bombing the Sudanese al-Shifa pharmaceutical plant in 1998,
with the consequent loss of thousands of lives. If a 'terrorist' had
perpetrated that act, it would have been 'an outrage' that 'lived in
infamy' for as long as the compliant and corrupt US mass media were
required to keep it there. And if an 'enemy government' had done it,
it would have been 'a heinous crime' that scandalised 'the whole
international community' and justified 'a swift and harsh response'.
But, as it was, it was just another act of violence by just another
American president. So it doesn't get so much as *remembered* -- not
even by *the people who claim to hate Clinton*. Because, you see, much
as these people 'hate Clinton', the fact is that *they love their
country's violence even more*...
M.
If this was a "crime", where is the indictment?
Excellent response: sub-moral, dishonest, and evasive. Thanks for outing
yourself: until you posted it, reasonable people might have thought you had
some substance to you.
M.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
25 Sep 2006 11:45:16 PM |
|
|
"Mark D J." <Mark D J.@hoyme.com> wrote in
news:da2Sg.66742$DB3.5596@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net:
"BOB" <sd@sd.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9849C312FCB97SD@70.169.32.36...
"Mark D J." <Mark D J.@hoyme.com> wrote in
news:GJXRg.33410$cx.10932@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net:
"BOB" <sd@sd.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9848E06A9B669SD@70.169.32.36...
buddwicker@earthlink.net wrote in
news:1159159491.016824.314890@d34g2000cwd
It has been duly noted that you failed to name any crimes that you
claim Clinton committed, buttfloss.
Yes. And it was *such an easy question*, too!
Answer: bombing the Sudanese al-Shifa pharmaceutical plant in 1998,
with the consequent loss of thousands of lives. If a 'terrorist' had
perpetrated that act, it would have been 'an outrage' that 'lived in
infamy' for as long as the compliant and corrupt US mass media were
required to keep it there. And if an 'enemy government' had done it,
it would have been 'a heinous crime' that scandalised 'the whole
international community' and justified 'a swift and harsh response'.
But, as it was, it was just another act of violence by just another
American president. So it doesn't get so much as *remembered* -- not
even by *the people who claim to hate Clinton*. Because, you see,
much as these people 'hate Clinton', the fact is that *they love
their country's violence even more*...
M.
If this was a "crime", where is the indictment?
Excellent response: sub-moral, dishonest, and evasive.
Sounds to me like you're the one being evasive, neocon. Again, if this
was a "crime", where is the evidence?
Thanks for
outing yourself: until you posted it, reasonable people might have
thought you had some substance to you.
Reasonable people? That leaves you out, bootlicker.
M.
Does the "M" stand for Moron?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
27 Sep 2006 09:00:39 AM |
|
|
BOB wrote:
Sounds to me like you're the one being evasive, neocon.
Since we're all claiming to be in a non-evasive mood here Bob,
maybe you can explain how members of Clinton's own party
voted for his impeachment; how that bipartisan group of noted
Presidential historians voted Clinton DEAD LAST in moral
authority, even below your favorite target Nixon....
Please explain these things Bob. While you're at it, you
could tell us what "is" is. That oughta be fun.
(BTW, doofusass, you don't even know what a "neocon" is.)
--------
THE ISRAEL LOBBY: Does it have too much influence on US foreign policy?
The London Review will be hosting a debate on 28 September in the Great
Hall, Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, Cooper
Square, New York. Go to the link in my sig to reserve tickets.
-----
Kill ratio of Palestinian children to Israeli children 5.7-to-1,
Israel's favor.
Kill ratio of all Palestinians to Israelis: over 3-to-1.
---------
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html
----------
"Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We,
the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."
---Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 2001
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: More Americans dead because of Bush than because of 9/11 |
27 Sep 2006 10:22:50 AM |
|
|
wrote in news:1159365639.499830.162870
@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
BOB wrote:
Sounds to me like you're the one being evasive, neocon.
Since we're all claiming to be in a non-evasive mood here Bob,
maybe you can explain how members of Clinton's own party
voted for his impeachment;
What's to explain, jerkoff? Clinton was acquitted during the trumpted-up
impeachment proceedings. Don't you care about facts?
how that bipartisan group of noted
Presidential historians voted Clinton DEAD LAST in moral
authority, even below your favorite target Nixon....
Where's your evidence, jerkoff?
Please explain these things Bob. While you're at it, you
could tell us what "is" is. That oughta be fun.
You "is" an idiot.
(BTW, doofusass, you don't even know what a "neocon" is.)
You.
--------
THE ISRAEL LOBBY: Does it have too much influence on US foreign policy?
The London Review will be hosting a debate on 28 September in the Great
Hall, Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, Cooper
Square, New York. Go to the link in my sig to reserve tickets.
-----
Kill ratio of Palestinian children to Israeli children 5.7-to-1,
Israel's favor.
Kill ratio of all Palestinians to Israelis: over 3-to-1.
---------
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html
----------
"Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We,
the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."
---Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 2001
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
