| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"David W. Barnes" |
| Date: |
30 Jun 2004 08:40:57 PM |
| Object: |
More illegal Republican activity |
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a dispute
has derailed a final budget."
.
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 08:55:03 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it and *****
at others.
That would be because you have double standards and you are a hypocrite.
I seen this little tiny piece at the bottom
Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
So explain why you are breaking the law...and you call yourself a lawyer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Shawn Hearn" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
01 Jul 2004 05:06:41 AM |
|
|
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it and *****
at others.
That would be because you have double standards and you are a hypocrite.
Considering some of your previous postings, you too are a hypocrite.
By the way, do you have a response to the actual content of David
Barnes' posting? I suspect your response will express your typical
view of Bush, which is whatever he does is fine, no matter how illegal,
immoral, and unethical Bush is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
01 Jul 2004 09:07:54 AM |
|
|
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-4B266A.06064101072004@news-40.sjc.giganews.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it and
*****
at others.
That would be because you have double standards and you are a hypocrite.
Considering some of your previous postings, you too are a hypocrite.
By the way, do you have a response to the actual content of David
Barnes' posting? I suspect your response will express your typical
view of Bush, which is whatever he does is fine, no matter how illegal,
immoral, and unethical Bush is.
Yea, my response is, it is just an article about the budget and differences
between members in congress and the senate...
BIG DEAL...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 09:14:25 PM |
|
|
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a guard? Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words. It is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt and must be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it and *****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law. Stop trying
so hard to fool people.
That would be because you have double standards and you are a hypocrite.
I know the law - you don't.
I seen this little tiny piece at the bottom
You "seen" it did you?
Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
So explain why you are breaking the law...and you call yourself a lawyer.
Idiot. Explaining the law to you is pointless. Needless to say, my
above comment was totally legal. You, as usual, were just to ignorant
to understand.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 09:54:33 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041914254379%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a guard? Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words. It is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt and must be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it and
*****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law. Stop trying
so hard to fool people.
Why do you ignore some people who do what you consider violating copyright
laws?
That would be because you have double standards and you are a hypocrite.
I know the law - you don't.
You don't know *****
I seen this little tiny piece at the bottom
You "seen" it did you?
Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material
may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
So explain why you are breaking the law...and you call yourself a
lawyer.
Idiot. Explaining the law to you is pointless. Needless to say, my
above comment was totally legal. You, as usual, were just to ignorant
to understand.
why do you ignore some people who supposably violate copyright laws?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 10:22:29 PM |
|
|
In article <LqKdnUQ_lLv-4X7dRVn_iw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041914254379%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a guard? Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words. It is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt and must be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it and
*****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law. Stop trying
so hard to fool people.
Why do you ignore some people who do what you consider violating copyright
laws?
Why do I have to answer to you?
That would be because you have double standards and you are a hypocrite.
I know the law - you don't.
You don't know *****
Even you know I am a lawyer...
I seen this little tiny piece at the bottom
You "seen" it did you?
Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material
may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
So explain why you are breaking the law...and you call yourself a
lawyer.
Idiot. Explaining the law to you is pointless. Needless to say, my
above comment was totally legal. You, as usual, were just to ignorant
to understand.
why do you ignore some people who supposably violate copyright laws?
Stop whining.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 10:39:32 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042022299706%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <LqKdnUQ_lLv-4X7dRVn_iw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041914254379%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the
law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you
fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to
the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the
second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a guard?
Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words. It is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt and must be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it and
*****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law. Stop
trying
so hard to fool people.
Why do you ignore some people who do what you consider violating
copyright
laws?
Why do I have to answer to you?
David Barnes has been exposed for lying.
I offered David Barnes the opportunity to answer a key question.
The fact that David Barnes was unable to answer it confirmed he was lying.
David Barnes in the past said he would give out this so called information
he had
if I was willing to give him permission. Well I did, and David Barnes
backed off and
was not going to give out any information. Which only makes sense because
David Barnes
doesn't have any information.
This ends this little game David Barnes has been trying to play. I have
called his bluff and succeeded in knocking him
into the dirt.
This "guard" defeated the big bag self proclaimed Lawyer...David Barnes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 11:26:45 PM |
|
|
In article <g6WdnQzr4bl4G37dRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042022299706%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <LqKdnUQ_lLv-4X7dRVn_iw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041914254379%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the
law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you
fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to
the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the
second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a guard?
Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words. It is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt and must be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it and
*****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law. Stop
trying
so hard to fool people.
Why do you ignore some people who do what you consider violating
copyright
laws?
Why do I have to answer to you?
David Barnes ...
You didn't answer, half wit.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 11:33:49 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042126451052%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <g6WdnQzr4bl4G37dRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042022299706%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <LqKdnUQ_lLv-4X7dRVn_iw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041914254379%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for
the
law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you
fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax
cuts to
the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the
second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that
a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright
laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a guard?
Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words. It is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt and must
be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it
and
*****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law. Stop
trying
so hard to fool people.
Why do you ignore some people who do what you consider violating
copyright
laws?
Why do I have to answer to you?
David Barnes ...
You didn't answer, half wit.
You didn't answer why you look the other way when people like Keegan violate
copyright laws..that is according to your so called standards.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 11:35:07 PM |
|
|
In article <2a-dnWG5x9kPDn7dRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042126451052%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <g6WdnQzr4bl4G37dRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042022299706%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <LqKdnUQ_lLv-4X7dRVn_iw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041914254379%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for
the
law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you
fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax
cuts to
the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the
second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that
a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating copyright
laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a guard?
Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words. It is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt and must
be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who do it
and
*****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law. Stop
trying
so hard to fool people.
Why do you ignore some people who do what you consider violating
copyright
laws?
Why do I have to answer to you?
David Barnes ...
You didn't answer, half wit.
You didn't answer why you look the other way when people like Keegan violate
copyright laws..that is according to your so called standards.
Make all the excuses you like, half wit.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 11:41:31 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042135071193%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <2a-dnWG5x9kPDn7dRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042126451052%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <g6WdnQzr4bl4G37dRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042022299706%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <LqKdnUQ_lLv-4X7dRVn_iw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041914254379%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt
for
the
law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell
you
fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax
cuts to
the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years --
the
second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate --
that
a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating
copyright
laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a guard?
Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words. It
is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt and
must
be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who
do it
and
*****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law.
Stop
trying
so hard to fool people.
Why do you ignore some people who do what you consider violating
copyright
laws?
Why do I have to answer to you?
David Barnes ...
You didn't answer, half wit.
You didn't answer why you look the other way when people like Keegan
violate
copyright laws..that is according to your so called standards.
Make all the excuses you like, half wit.
What excuse? Why do you look the other way?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 11:40:41 PM |
|
|
In article <ztqdnd5HaZPCCH7d4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042135071193%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <2a-dnWG5x9kPDn7dRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042126451052%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <g6WdnQzr4bl4G37dRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042022299706%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <LqKdnUQ_lLv-4X7dRVn_iw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620041914254379%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt
for
the
law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell
you
fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax
cuts to
the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years --
the
second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate --
that
a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating
copyright
laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a guard?
Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words. It
is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt and
must
be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people who
do it
and
*****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law.
Stop
trying
so hard to fool people.
Why do you ignore some people who do what you consider violating
copyright
laws?
Why do I have to answer to you?
David Barnes ...
You didn't answer, half wit.
You didn't answer why you look the other way when people like Keegan
violate
copyright laws..that is according to your so called standards.
Make all the excuses you like, half wit.
What excuse? Why do you look the other way?
I told you - you don't understand the law so you believe I look the
other way.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 11:45:28 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042140411233%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <ztqdnd5HaZPCCH7d4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042135071193%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <2a-dnWG5x9kPDn7dRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042126451052%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <g6WdnQzr4bl4G37dRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:300620042022299706%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <LqKdnUQ_lLv-4X7dRVn_iw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
message
news:300620041914254379%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <_qidnbliu4Tg837dRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
message
news:300620041840573921%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their
contempt
for
the
law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will
tell
you
fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush
tax
cuts to
the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven
years --
the
second
when Republicans controlled both the House and
Senate --
that
a
dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission? Why are you violating
copyright
laws?
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
You dumb *****. How the hell did you ever get to be a
guard?
Copyright
allows a very limited use of a restricted number of words.
It
is
called "fair use." Fair use is usually a short excerpt
and
must
be
attributed. (Like I did above.)
Well that isn't entirely true. You ignore some people
who
do it
and
*****
at others.
Why are you such a moron? You know NOTHING about the law.
Stop
trying
so hard to fool people.
Why do you ignore some people who do what you consider
violating
copyright
laws?
Why do I have to answer to you?
David Barnes ...
You didn't answer, half wit.
You didn't answer why you look the other way when people like Keegan
violate
copyright laws..that is according to your so called standards.
Make all the excuses you like, half wit.
What excuse? Why do you look the other way?
I told you - you don't understand the law so you believe I look the
other way.
Why do you look the other way?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
30 Jun 2004 11:46:39 PM |
|
|
In article <pc6dnXosUL_WC37dRVn-gw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
What excuse? Why do you look the other way?
I told you - you don't understand the law so you believe I look the
other way.
Why do you look the other way?
See? LOL!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: More illegal Republican activity |
01 Jul 2004 12:02:40 AM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/bush.nader/index.html
Here we see the Republicans demonstrating their contempt for the law
and the American public. (I doubt Fox "NEWS" will tell you fascists
about this.)
And even Republicans are beginning to realize the Bush tax cuts to the
wealthy are bad news:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/30/congress.budget.ap/index.html
"This would be the third time in the past seven years -- the second
when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate -- that a dispute
has derailed a final budget."
Did you get their permission?
For what, idiot?
Why are you violating copyright laws?
He isn't, you stupid *****. Posting small excerpts is completely
legal. Besides, according to you, he wrote everything above.
Isn't this what you ***** at others for doing?
No, moron, it isn't.
Well that isn't entirely true.
It isn't true at all because you wrote it, *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
