| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"David W. Barnes" |
| Date: |
02 Feb 2006 11:24:04 PM |
| Object: |
More Voter Fraud |
Today, House Republicans selected Rep. John Boehner of Ohio for their
new majority leader after Tom Delay has forced out due to ethical
violations. But it took awhile - two ballots. Why? Because after the
first ballot it was discovered that more Republicans had voted than
were eligible to vote. Sound familiar?
Republicans probably figure it has worked twice before, why not again?
.
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 04:51:36 PM |
|
|
In article <aXrFf.1235$NR.826@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-C10A3D.12584305022006@individual.net...
In article <y4iFf.1216$NR.239@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush,
it's not a problem, and it it not "everyone" wither; only the sane
ones.
I don't mind bitching about bush if it is honest and the accusing party is
not themself guilty of the same. The dems here are some of the biggest
hypocrites I ever seen though.
your words are hollow and not based upon demonstrable fact.
yet they have nothing better to offer.
another of your blatant misrepresentations. everyone has something
better to offer.
Yet your party continues not to offer him...
i'll repeat, "everyone has something better to offer."
i didn't say my party or your party or no party. i didn't mention
party.
only lightweights like you offer such fragile strawmen.
Show us a better way,
every president has done that,
So you would prefer president Boris Yeltsin?
yes, of course. satan would probably do a better job.
bush has harmed the united states far more in his limited time in
office than off of the usa's enemies since the usa came into
existence.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 06:28:51 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-2EA580.17513605022006@individual.net...
In article <aXrFf.1235$NR.826@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-C10A3D.12584305022006@individual.net...
In article <y4iFf.1216$NR.239@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush,
it's not a problem, and it it not "everyone" wither; only the sane
ones.
I don't mind bitching about bush if it is honest and the accusing party
is
not themself guilty of the same. The dems here are some of the biggest
hypocrites I ever seen though.
your words are hollow and not based upon demonstrable fact.
yet they have nothing better to offer.
another of your blatant misrepresentations. everyone has something
better to offer.
Yet your party continues not to offer him...
i'll repeat, "everyone has something better to offer."
i didn't say my party or your party or no party. i didn't mention
party.
So in reality, you have nothing to offer huh? I figured that.
only lightweights like you offer such fragile strawmen.
Show us a better way,
every president has done that,
So you would prefer president Boris Yeltsin?
yes, of course. satan would probably do a better job.
bush has harmed the united states far more in his limited time in
office than off of the usa's enemies since the usa came into
existence.
But he has done better than most liberals I've seen would do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 07:26:32 PM |
|
|
In article <wRRFf.2212$NR.1108@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-2EA580.17513605022006@individual.net...
bush has harmed the united states far more in his limited time in
office than off of the usa's enemies since the usa came into
existence.
But he has done better than most liberals I've seen would do.
again the bush apologist claims that imagined crimes are worse than
real ones.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "2245 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 09:40:50 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:48:13 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e5a314.173104328@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:05:29 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:030220061952496096%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <HiQEf.995$NR.98@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2242 Dead" <zepp#22112242dead@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote in
message
news:tbh7u1p4tssrrs763sl09dinpatot2rrh3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:46:03 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Today, House Republicans selected Rep. John Boehner of Ohio for
their
new majority leader after Tom Delay has forced out due to ethical
violations. But it took awhile - two ballots. Why? Because
after
the
first ballot it was discovered that more Republicans had voted
than
were eligible to vote. Sound familiar?
Republicans probably figure it has worked twice before, why not
again?
Still can't stand that Bush destroyed the two jokes your "party"
offered up for his sacrifice, I see. Continue denying reality,
loser.
See the irrational hate of the cultist. To them it's all about
"winning" and to hell with America.
It's that way for both parties.
Ah, the favorite lie of the GOP right winger: "But they're just as
big
a bunch of dirtbags as we are!"
That's because you are as bad as republicans...Why don't you admit it?
Is
it
because you resent them so much that you would hate for it to be
possible
that you have something in common with them? I hate to break it to you,
but
you do.
The Osprey Defense (If you can claim others do what you are accused of,
you are correct in what you do.)
Where did I claim that it was the correct thing to do? Fact is, I didn't.
Once again, you are proven a liar.
So why did you bring it up (even if it were true, which I have yet to
see you prove).
Let's see - Clinton lied about a ***** and Bush lied about a
nuclear weapon threat so both parties are bad and what - you don't
want to do anything about Bush?
You are useless and you deserve everything you are getting.
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush, yet they
have nothing better to offer. Show us a better way, if you have one. It sure
doesn't lie in Gore or Kerry.
Well, let's see: if Gore had been appointed by the SC instead;
the national debt would be nearly paid off by now, and taxes could be
reduced 15% -- mostly for the poor and middle class -- while
maintaining a balanced budget.
We probably STILL wouldn't have lost anyone in war.
The twin towers might still be standing and OBL just another turban
monkey whining about Israel.
I base this on how things went under eight years of Clinton.
--
"'I知 not meeting with that goddamned *****,' Bush screamed at aides
who suggested he meet with Cindy Sheehan, the war-protesting mother
whose son died in Iraq. 'She can go to hell as far as I知 concerned!'"
--Putsch, a decompensating drunk
"Grover Norquist couldn't drown the government, so he drowned New Orleans instead."
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "shrikeback" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 01:55:48 PM |
|
|
"2245 Dead" <zepp2211#2245finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:tu6cu11siim5i2v15tqdec1p7hgjpdoshl@4ax.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:48:13 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e5a314.173104328@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:05:29 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:030220061952496096%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <HiQEf.995$NR.98@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2242 Dead" <zepp#22112242dead@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote in
message
news:tbh7u1p4tssrrs763sl09dinpatot2rrh3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:46:03 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Today, House Republicans selected Rep. John Boehner of Ohio for
their
new majority leader after Tom Delay has forced out due to
ethical
violations. But it took awhile - two ballots. Why? Because
after
the
first ballot it was discovered that more Republicans had voted
than
were eligible to vote. Sound familiar?
Republicans probably figure it has worked twice before, why not
again?
Still can't stand that Bush destroyed the two jokes your "party"
offered up for his sacrifice, I see. Continue denying reality,
loser.
See the irrational hate of the cultist. To them it's all about
"winning" and to hell with America.
It's that way for both parties.
Ah, the favorite lie of the GOP right winger: "But they're just as
big
a bunch of dirtbags as we are!"
That's because you are as bad as republicans...Why don't you admit
it?
Is
it
because you resent them so much that you would hate for it to be
possible
that you have something in common with them? I hate to break it to
you,
but
you do.
The Osprey Defense (If you can claim others do what you are accused
of,
you are correct in what you do.)
Where did I claim that it was the correct thing to do? Fact is, I
didn't.
Once again, you are proven a liar.
So why did you bring it up (even if it were true, which I have yet to
see you prove).
Let's see - Clinton lied about a ***** and Bush lied about a
nuclear weapon threat so both parties are bad and what - you don't
want to do anything about Bush?
You are useless and you deserve everything you are getting.
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush, yet they
have nothing better to offer. Show us a better way, if you have one. It
sure
doesn't lie in Gore or Kerry.
Well, let's see: if Gore had been appointed by the SC instead;
the national debt would be nearly paid off by now,
No.
and taxes could be
reduced 15% -- mostly for the poor and middle class -- while
maintaining a balanced budget.
Nope. The recession was inevitable by the time the election
was over. The first round of layoffs I saw were about the time
of Bush's inauguration. So the recession would have happened
anyway, and tax revenues would have dropped, no matter what.
The recession would have gone on longer though. That would
have made you happy, because the proletariat would be more
disgruntled than ever. Maybe you could sell them some Leftism
more easily.
We probably STILL wouldn't have lost anyone in war.
Sanctions would have been lifted, and Total-Fina-Elf would
be raking in the profits. And a new breeder reactor would
be under construction in Iraq. And, hell, we'd be subsidizing
the production of a breeder reactor in North Korea.
The twin towers might still be standing and OBL just another turban
monkey whining about Israel.
Not fucking likely.
I base this on how things went under eight years of Clinton.
No, you base this on your own wishful thinking.
.
|
|
|
| User: "2245 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 03:31:17 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:55:48 -0800, "shrikeback"
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"2245 Dead" <zepp2211#2245finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:tu6cu11siim5i2v15tqdec1p7hgjpdoshl@4ax.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:48:13 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e5a314.173104328@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:05:29 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:030220061952496096%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <HiQEf.995$NR.98@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2242 Dead" <zepp#22112242dead@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote in
message
news:tbh7u1p4tssrrs763sl09dinpatot2rrh3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:46:03 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Today, House Republicans selected Rep. John Boehner of Ohio for
their
new majority leader after Tom Delay has forced out due to
ethical
violations. But it took awhile - two ballots. Why? Because
after
the
first ballot it was discovered that more Republicans had voted
than
were eligible to vote. Sound familiar?
Republicans probably figure it has worked twice before, why not
again?
Still can't stand that Bush destroyed the two jokes your "party"
offered up for his sacrifice, I see. Continue denying reality,
loser.
See the irrational hate of the cultist. To them it's all about
"winning" and to hell with America.
It's that way for both parties.
Ah, the favorite lie of the GOP right winger: "But they're just as
big
a bunch of dirtbags as we are!"
That's because you are as bad as republicans...Why don't you admit
it?
Is
it
because you resent them so much that you would hate for it to be
possible
that you have something in common with them? I hate to break it to
you,
but
you do.
The Osprey Defense (If you can claim others do what you are accused
of,
you are correct in what you do.)
Where did I claim that it was the correct thing to do? Fact is, I
didn't.
Once again, you are proven a liar.
So why did you bring it up (even if it were true, which I have yet to
see you prove).
Let's see - Clinton lied about a ***** and Bush lied about a
nuclear weapon threat so both parties are bad and what - you don't
want to do anything about Bush?
You are useless and you deserve everything you are getting.
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush, yet they
have nothing better to offer. Show us a better way, if you have one. It
sure
doesn't lie in Gore or Kerry.
Well, let's see: if Gore had been appointed by the SC instead;
the national debt would be nearly paid off by now,
No.
Yes. The reason for the budget explosion was the huge tax cuts for
the rich, the wars, and the reduction in revenues caused by outfits
like Enron flat-out raping the economy.
and taxes could be
reduced 15% -- mostly for the poor and middle class -- while
maintaining a balanced budget.
Nope. The recession was inevitable by the time the election
was over. The first round of layoffs I saw were about the time
of Bush's inauguration. So the recession would have happened
anyway, and tax revenues would have dropped, no matter what.
The recession was mild, and would have ended sooner.
The recession would have gone on longer though. That would
have made you happy, because the proletariat would be more
disgruntled than ever. Maybe you could sell them some Leftism
more easily.
You really live in a strange, far away universe, don't you?
We probably STILL wouldn't have lost anyone in war.
Sanctions would have been lifted, and Total-Fina-Elf would
be raking in the profits. And a new breeder reactor would
be under construction in Iraq. And, hell, we'd be subsidizing
the production of a breeder reactor in North Korea.
The stuff about "a new breeder reactor" is sheerest moonshine. Fact
is, Saddam's nuclear program simply no longer existed, and he was
fully contained. He wasn't even a threat to the Kurds any more.
As for NK, I note that they HAVE a breeder reactor. What's Putsch
doing about that?
The twin towers might still be standing and OBL just another turban
monkey whining about Israel.
Not fucking likely.
Very fucking likely. The US had to deliberately drop its guard for
that plan to work.
I base this on how things went under eight years of Clinton.
No, you base this on your own wishful thinking.
I have the track record. All you have is the colossal failures of the
past five years.
--
"'I知 not meeting with that goddamned *****,' Bush screamed at aides
who suggested he meet with Cindy Sheehan, the war-protesting mother
whose son died in Iraq. 'She can go to hell as far as I知 concerned!'"
--Putsch, a decompensating drunk
"Grover Norquist couldn't drown the government, so he drowned New Orleans instead."
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "shrikeback" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 11:05:42 PM |
|
|
"2245 Dead" <zepp2211#2245finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:t9rcu1l96i637pkirmk50kl3ajtcuf3jcl@4ax.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:55:48 -0800, "shrikeback"
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"2245 Dead" <zepp2211#2245finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:tu6cu11siim5i2v15tqdec1p7hgjpdoshl@4ax.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:48:13 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e5a314.173104328@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:05:29 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:030220061952496096%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <HiQEf.995$NR.98@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2242 Dead" <zepp#22112242dead@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote
in
message
news:tbh7u1p4tssrrs763sl09dinpatot2rrh3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:46:03 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Today, House Republicans selected Rep. John Boehner of Ohio
for
their
new majority leader after Tom Delay has forced out due to
ethical
violations. But it took awhile - two ballots. Why? Because
after
the
first ballot it was discovered that more Republicans had voted
than
were eligible to vote. Sound familiar?
Republicans probably figure it has worked twice before, why
not
again?
Still can't stand that Bush destroyed the two jokes your
"party"
offered up for his sacrifice, I see. Continue denying reality,
loser.
See the irrational hate of the cultist. To them it's all about
"winning" and to hell with America.
It's that way for both parties.
Ah, the favorite lie of the GOP right winger: "But they're just
as
big
a bunch of dirtbags as we are!"
That's because you are as bad as republicans...Why don't you admit
it?
Is
it
because you resent them so much that you would hate for it to be
possible
that you have something in common with them? I hate to break it to
you,
but
you do.
The Osprey Defense (If you can claim others do what you are accused
of,
you are correct in what you do.)
Where did I claim that it was the correct thing to do? Fact is, I
didn't.
Once again, you are proven a liar.
So why did you bring it up (even if it were true, which I have yet to
see you prove).
Let's see - Clinton lied about a ***** and Bush lied about a
nuclear weapon threat so both parties are bad and what - you don't
want to do anything about Bush?
You are useless and you deserve everything you are getting.
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush, yet
they
have nothing better to offer. Show us a better way, if you have one. It
sure
doesn't lie in Gore or Kerry.
Well, let's see: if Gore had been appointed by the SC instead;
the national debt would be nearly paid off by now,
No.
Yes. The reason for the budget explosion was the huge tax cuts for
the rich, the wars, and the reduction in revenues caused by outfits
like Enron flat-out raping the economy.
No. The reason for the budget explosion was the loss of revenue
resulting from the recession, the size of this loss of revenue dwarfed
the puny tax cuts. The fact is that the stock market lost two trillion
dollars worth of value during 2000. This necessarily had some
deflationary impact.
and taxes could be
reduced 15% -- mostly for the poor and middle class -- while
maintaining a balanced budget.
Nope. The recession was inevitable by the time the election
was over. The first round of layoffs I saw were about the time
of Bush's inauguration. So the recession would have happened
anyway, and tax revenues would have dropped, no matter what.
The recession was mild, and would have ended sooner.
Mild for you maybe.
The recession would have gone on longer though. That would
have made you happy, because the proletariat would be more
disgruntled than ever. Maybe you could sell them some Leftism
more easily.
You really live in a strange, far away universe, don't you?
I'm just saying. You guys all advocated for a tax hike during a
recession, did you not? All you gotta do is look at Keynes and
realize that this is a bad idea, according to liberal economic
orthodoxy.
We probably STILL wouldn't have lost anyone in war.
Sanctions would have been lifted, and Total-Fina-Elf would
be raking in the profits. And a new breeder reactor would
be under construction in Iraq. And, hell, we'd be subsidizing
the production of a breeder reactor in North Korea.
The stuff about "a new breeder reactor" is sheerest moonshine. Fact
is, Saddam's nuclear program simply no longer existed, and he was
fully contained. He wasn't even a threat to the Kurds any more.
As for NK, I note that they HAVE a breeder reactor. What's Putsch
doing about that?
<http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2005-07/2005-07-19-voa52.cfm?CFID=27814553&CFTOKEN=33635408>
Bush Pleased by North Korea's Return to Talks
The twin towers might still be standing and OBL just another turban
monkey whining about Israel.
Not fucking likely.
Very fucking likely. The US had to deliberately drop its guard for
that plan to work.
Yeah right. "Deliberately drop its guard." Speaking of distant universes.
That's one from the universe where the Queen of England is an evil
neocon lizardperson, isn't it? 9-11 was an inside job, my *****.
I base this on how things went under eight years of Clinton.
No, you base this on your own wishful thinking.
I have the track record.
You have the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is what you mean.
The economy boomed during the nineties, and it stalled in 2001,
resulting in a loss of revenue. But, you should know that the New
Dealer Keynesian way of dealing with recessions is to increase the
deficit.
All you have is the colossal failures of the
past five years.
Unemployment is pretty freaking low.
.
|
|
|
| User: "2245 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 12:52:52 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:05:42 -0800, "shrikeback"
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"2245 Dead" <zepp2211#2245finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:t9rcu1l96i637pkirmk50kl3ajtcuf3jcl@4ax.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:55:48 -0800, "shrikeback"
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"2245 Dead" <zepp2211#2245finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:tu6cu11siim5i2v15tqdec1p7hgjpdoshl@4ax.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:48:13 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e5a314.173104328@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:05:29 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:030220061952496096%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <HiQEf.995$NR.98@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2242 Dead" <zepp#22112242dead@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote
in
message
news:tbh7u1p4tssrrs763sl09dinpatot2rrh3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:46:03 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Today, House Republicans selected Rep. John Boehner of Ohio
for
their
new majority leader after Tom Delay has forced out due to
ethical
violations. But it took awhile - two ballots. Why? Because
after
the
first ballot it was discovered that more Republicans had voted
than
were eligible to vote. Sound familiar?
Republicans probably figure it has worked twice before, why
not
again?
Still can't stand that Bush destroyed the two jokes your
"party"
offered up for his sacrifice, I see. Continue denying reality,
loser.
See the irrational hate of the cultist. To them it's all about
"winning" and to hell with America.
It's that way for both parties.
Ah, the favorite lie of the GOP right winger: "But they're just
as
big
a bunch of dirtbags as we are!"
That's because you are as bad as republicans...Why don't you admit
it?
Is
it
because you resent them so much that you would hate for it to be
possible
that you have something in common with them? I hate to break it to
you,
but
you do.
The Osprey Defense (If you can claim others do what you are accused
of,
you are correct in what you do.)
Where did I claim that it was the correct thing to do? Fact is, I
didn't.
Once again, you are proven a liar.
So why did you bring it up (even if it were true, which I have yet to
see you prove).
Let's see - Clinton lied about a ***** and Bush lied about a
nuclear weapon threat so both parties are bad and what - you don't
want to do anything about Bush?
You are useless and you deserve everything you are getting.
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush, yet
they
have nothing better to offer. Show us a better way, if you have one. It
sure
doesn't lie in Gore or Kerry.
Well, let's see: if Gore had been appointed by the SC instead;
the national debt would be nearly paid off by now,
No.
Yes. The reason for the budget explosion was the huge tax cuts for
the rich, the wars, and the reduction in revenues caused by outfits
like Enron flat-out raping the economy.
No. The reason for the budget explosion was the loss of revenue
resulting from the recession, the size of this loss of revenue dwarfed
the puny tax cuts. The fact is that the stock market lost two trillion
dollars worth of value during 2000. This necessarily had some
deflationary impact.
Nice try, but the fact is that outside of NASDAQ, which was about 2%
of the economy, the market regained nearly all of those loses in 2001,
and again after 9/11 by early 2002. And NASDAQ was a bubble,
asserting value that never actually existed.
And inflation was actually a little bit higher in the five years under
Putsch than under eight years of Clinton. So much for "deflationary
impact".
and taxes could be
reduced 15% -- mostly for the poor and middle class -- while
maintaining a balanced budget.
Nope. The recession was inevitable by the time the election
was over. The first round of layoffs I saw were about the time
of Bush's inauguration. So the recession would have happened
anyway, and tax revenues would have dropped, no matter what.
The recession was mild, and would have ended sooner.
Mild for you maybe.
The recession would have gone on longer though. That would
have made you happy, because the proletariat would be more
disgruntled than ever. Maybe you could sell them some Leftism
more easily.
You really live in a strange, far away universe, don't you?
I'm just saying. You guys all advocated for a tax hike during a
recession, did you not? All you gotta do is look at Keynes and
realize that this is a bad idea, according to liberal economic
orthodoxy.
We probably STILL wouldn't have lost anyone in war.
Sanctions would have been lifted, and Total-Fina-Elf would
be raking in the profits. And a new breeder reactor would
be under construction in Iraq. And, hell, we'd be subsidizing
the production of a breeder reactor in North Korea.
The stuff about "a new breeder reactor" is sheerest moonshine. Fact
is, Saddam's nuclear program simply no longer existed, and he was
fully contained. He wasn't even a threat to the Kurds any more.
As for NK, I note that they HAVE a breeder reactor. What's Putsch
doing about that?
<http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2005-07/2005-07-19-voa52.cfm?CFID=27814553&CFTOKEN=33635408>
Bush Pleased by North Korea's Return to Talks
The twin towers might still be standing and OBL just another turban
monkey whining about Israel.
Not fucking likely.
Very fucking likely. The US had to deliberately drop its guard for
that plan to work.
Yeah right. "Deliberately drop its guard." Speaking of distant universes.
That's one from the universe where the Queen of England is an evil
neocon lizardperson, isn't it? 9-11 was an inside job, my *****.
I base this on how things went under eight years of Clinton.
No, you base this on your own wishful thinking.
I have the track record.
You have the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is what you mean.
The economy boomed during the nineties, and it stalled in 2001,
resulting in a loss of revenue. But, you should know that the New
Dealer Keynesian way of dealing with recessions is to increase the
deficit.
All you have is the colossal failures of the
past five years.
Unemployment is pretty freaking low.
--
"'I知 not meeting with that goddamned *****,' Bush screamed at aides
who suggested he meet with Cindy Sheehan, the war-protesting mother
whose son died in Iraq. 'She can go to hell as far as I知 concerned!'"
--Putsch, a decompensating drunk
"Grover Norquist couldn't drown the government, so he drowned New Orleans instead."
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 12:57:35 PM |
|
|
"2245 Dead" <zepp2211#2245finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:tu6cu11siim5i2v15tqdec1p7hgjpdoshl@4ax.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:48:13 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e5a314.173104328@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:05:29 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:030220061952496096%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <HiQEf.995$NR.98@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2242 Dead" <zepp#22112242dead@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote in
message
news:tbh7u1p4tssrrs763sl09dinpatot2rrh3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:46:03 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Today, House Republicans selected Rep. John Boehner of Ohio for
their
new majority leader after Tom Delay has forced out due to
ethical
violations. But it took awhile - two ballots. Why? Because
after
the
first ballot it was discovered that more Republicans had voted
than
were eligible to vote. Sound familiar?
Republicans probably figure it has worked twice before, why not
again?
Still can't stand that Bush destroyed the two jokes your "party"
offered up for his sacrifice, I see. Continue denying reality,
loser.
See the irrational hate of the cultist. To them it's all about
"winning" and to hell with America.
It's that way for both parties.
Ah, the favorite lie of the GOP right winger: "But they're just as
big
a bunch of dirtbags as we are!"
That's because you are as bad as republicans...Why don't you admit
it?
Is
it
because you resent them so much that you would hate for it to be
possible
that you have something in common with them? I hate to break it to
you,
but
you do.
The Osprey Defense (If you can claim others do what you are accused
of,
you are correct in what you do.)
Where did I claim that it was the correct thing to do? Fact is, I
didn't.
Once again, you are proven a liar.
So why did you bring it up (even if it were true, which I have yet to
see you prove).
Let's see - Clinton lied about a ***** and Bush lied about a
nuclear weapon threat so both parties are bad and what - you don't
want to do anything about Bush?
You are useless and you deserve everything you are getting.
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush, yet they
have nothing better to offer. Show us a better way, if you have one. It
sure
doesn't lie in Gore or Kerry.
Well, let's see: if Gore had been appointed by the SC instead;
the national debt would be nearly paid off by now, and taxes could be
reduced 15% -- mostly for the poor and middle class -- while
maintaining a balanced budget.
We probably STILL wouldn't have lost anyone in war.
The twin towers might still be standing and OBL just another turban
monkey whining about Israel.
I base this on how things went under eight years of Clinton.
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no wonder.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 03:58:07 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:57:35 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2245 Dead" <zepp2211#2245finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:tu6cu11siim5i2v15tqdec1p7hgjpdoshl@4ax.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:48:13 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e5a314.173104328@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:05:29 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:030220061952496096%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <HiQEf.995$NR.98@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2242 Dead" <zepp#22112242dead@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote in
message
news:tbh7u1p4tssrrs763sl09dinpatot2rrh3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:46:03 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Today, House Republicans selected Rep. John Boehner of Ohio for
their
new majority leader after Tom Delay has forced out due to
ethical
violations. But it took awhile - two ballots. Why? Because
after
the
first ballot it was discovered that more Republicans had voted
than
were eligible to vote. Sound familiar?
Republicans probably figure it has worked twice before, why not
again?
Still can't stand that Bush destroyed the two jokes your "party"
offered up for his sacrifice, I see. Continue denying reality,
loser.
See the irrational hate of the cultist. To them it's all about
"winning" and to hell with America.
It's that way for both parties.
Ah, the favorite lie of the GOP right winger: "But they're just as
big
a bunch of dirtbags as we are!"
That's because you are as bad as republicans...Why don't you admit
it?
Is
it
because you resent them so much that you would hate for it to be
possible
that you have something in common with them? I hate to break it to
you,
but
you do.
The Osprey Defense (If you can claim others do what you are accused
of,
you are correct in what you do.)
Where did I claim that it was the correct thing to do? Fact is, I
didn't.
Once again, you are proven a liar.
So why did you bring it up (even if it were true, which I have yet to
see you prove).
Let's see - Clinton lied about a ***** and Bush lied about a
nuclear weapon threat so both parties are bad and what - you don't
want to do anything about Bush?
You are useless and you deserve everything you are getting.
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush, yet they
have nothing better to offer. Show us a better way, if you have one. It
sure
doesn't lie in Gore or Kerry.
Well, let's see: if Gore had been appointed by the SC instead;
the national debt would be nearly paid off by now, and taxes could be
reduced 15% -- mostly for the poor and middle class -- while
maintaining a balanced budget.
We probably STILL wouldn't have lost anyone in war.
The twin towers might still be standing and OBL just another turban
monkey whining about Israel.
I base this on how things went under eight years of Clinton.
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no wonder.
LOL, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Clinton actually
worked on getting rid of Al Queda. To the point everyone thought he
was obsessed with it.
He passed the job along to Bush who said - nah, I don't wanna and
along with Rice dropped the ball off the cliff and let it all go.
And then Al Queda bombed us while Bush stared in the air in a
kindergarten.
And with logic like yours, no wonder this country is in a fast bucket
to hell. No matter how bad your boy does, you shut your eyes so tight
it must hurt to keep from seeing how much better the job was being
done by the left.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 04:17:47 PM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e8733c.226391906@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:57:35 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2245 Dead" <zepp2211#2245finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:tu6cu11siim5i2v15tqdec1p7hgjpdoshl@4ax.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:48:13 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e5a314.173104328@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:05:29 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:030220061952496096%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <HiQEf.995$NR.98@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"2242 Dead" <zepp#22112242dead@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote
in
message
news:tbh7u1p4tssrrs763sl09dinpatot2rrh3@4ax.com...
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:46:03 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Today, House Republicans selected Rep. John Boehner of Ohio
for
their
new majority leader after Tom Delay has forced out due to
ethical
violations. But it took awhile - two ballots. Why? Because
after
the
first ballot it was discovered that more Republicans had voted
than
were eligible to vote. Sound familiar?
Republicans probably figure it has worked twice before, why
not
again?
Still can't stand that Bush destroyed the two jokes your
"party"
offered up for his sacrifice, I see. Continue denying reality,
loser.
See the irrational hate of the cultist. To them it's all about
"winning" and to hell with America.
It's that way for both parties.
Ah, the favorite lie of the GOP right winger: "But they're just
as
big
a bunch of dirtbags as we are!"
That's because you are as bad as republicans...Why don't you admit
it?
Is
it
because you resent them so much that you would hate for it to be
possible
that you have something in common with them? I hate to break it to
you,
but
you do.
The Osprey Defense (If you can claim others do what you are accused
of,
you are correct in what you do.)
Where did I claim that it was the correct thing to do? Fact is, I
didn't.
Once again, you are proven a liar.
So why did you bring it up (even if it were true, which I have yet to
see you prove).
Let's see - Clinton lied about a ***** and Bush lied about a
nuclear weapon threat so both parties are bad and what - you don't
want to do anything about Bush?
You are useless and you deserve everything you are getting.
The only problem here comes up when everyone bitches about Bush, yet
they
have nothing better to offer. Show us a better way, if you have one. It
sure
doesn't lie in Gore or Kerry.
Well, let's see: if Gore had been appointed by the SC instead;
the national debt would be nearly paid off by now, and taxes could be
reduced 15% -- mostly for the poor and middle class -- while
maintaining a balanced budget.
We probably STILL wouldn't have lost anyone in war.
The twin towers might still be standing and OBL just another turban
monkey whining about Israel.
I base this on how things went under eight years of Clinton.
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced
protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said
before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no wonder.
LOL, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Clinton actually
worked on getting rid of Al Queda. To the point everyone thought he
was obsessed with it.
If that is so, why didn't he get rid of Bid Laden when he had the chance to
get him handed over with a bow on his head. I guess cutting military budgets
helps get rid of terrorists.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 05:59:54 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
"Reasoned Insanity"
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced
protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said
before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no wonder.
LOL, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Clinton actually
worked on getting rid of Al Queda. To the point everyone thought he
was obsessed with it.
If that is so, why didn't he get rid of Bid Laden when he had the chance to
get him handed over with a bow on his head.
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
I guess cutting military budgets
helps get rid of terrorists.
I guess that you're a coward who doesn't feel safe unless you're
living in a military dictatorship.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
05 Feb 2006 08:00:26 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
"Reasoned Insanity"
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced
protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said
before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no
wonder.
LOL, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Clinton actually
worked on getting rid of Al Queda. To the point everyone thought he
was obsessed with it.
If that is so, why didn't he get rid of Bid Laden when he had the chance
to
get him handed over with a bow on his head.
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good. Lying under oath is illegal
too, but he did that. I wonder how many other illegal activities he was
responsible for. Whitewater is one. Illegal campaign contributions are
another. There are probably more, but that's all I can think of right now. I
wonder why Clinton has so much regard for not breaking the law to bring in a
terrorist, but has so little regard for the laws in his own country.
I guess cutting military budgets
helps get rid of terrorists.
I guess that you're a coward who doesn't feel safe unless you're
living in a military dictatorship.
No, I just like having a strong defence...something liberals like you don't
have a history of believing in.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 07:32:15 AM |
|
|
In article <xTzFf.1691$NR.100@dukeread12>, bush apoligist
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good.
breaking the law is ok if it is for the greater good eh? will your
excuses for bush never end?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 06:23:51 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-0D7FD9.08321506022006@individual.net...
In article <xTzFf.1691$NR.100@dukeread12>, bush apoligist
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good.
breaking the law is ok if it is for the greater good eh? will your
excuses for bush never end?
Where have I ever excused Bush for anything? Once again, you prove yourself
to be a lying little *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 07:22:36 PM |
|
|
In article <EMRFf.2210$NR.1715@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-0D7FD9.08321506022006@individual.net...
In article <xTzFf.1691$NR.100@dukeread12>, bush apoligist
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good.
breaking the law is ok if it is for the greater good eh? will your
excuses for bush never end?
Where have I ever excused Bush for anything?
in your hundreds of responses to posts critical of bush's lies or
murders.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 10:42:45 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-9A9CFE.20223606022006@individual.net...
In article <EMRFf.2210$NR.1715@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-0D7FD9.08321506022006@individual.net...
In article <xTzFf.1691$NR.100@dukeread12>, bush apoligist
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good.
breaking the law is ok if it is for the greater good eh? will your
excuses for bush never end?
Where have I ever excused Bush for anything?
in your hundreds of responses to posts critical of bush's lies or
murders.
I've never supported Bush, but I've called you hypocrites on your own
misgivings toward him because liberals are guilty of the same. If you can't
take the heat, quit trying to cook.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
10 Feb 2006 04:54:15 PM |
|
|
In article <YzVFf.2242$NR.1600@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-9A9CFE.20223606022006@individual.net...
In article <EMRFf.2210$NR.1715@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-0D7FD9.08321506022006@individual.net...
In article <xTzFf.1691$NR.100@dukeread12>, bush apoligist
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good.
breaking the law is ok if it is for the greater good eh? will your
excuses for bush never end?
Where have I ever excused Bush for anything?
in your hundreds of responses to posts critical of bush's lies or
murders.
I've never supported Bush,
lying doesn't help your case. you have rarely failed to defend bush.
but I've called you hypocrites on your own
misgivings toward him because liberals are guilty of the same.
the only person guilty of bush's crimes is bush, toady.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 09:32:03 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:00:26 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
"Reasoned Insanity"
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced
protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said
before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no
wonder.
LOL, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Clinton actually
worked on getting rid of Al Queda. To the point everyone thought he
was obsessed with it.
If that is so, why didn't he get rid of Bid Laden when he had the chance
to
get him handed over with a bow on his head.
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good. Lying under oath is illegal
too, but he did that. I wonder how many other illegal activities he was
responsible for. Whitewater is one. Illegal campaign contributions are
another. There are probably more, but that's all I can think of right now. I
wonder why Clinton has so much regard for not breaking the law to bring in a
terrorist, but has so little regard for the laws in his own country.
This is exactly the problem with people like you. You think the ends
justifies the means. That's a sign of major stupidity and exactly how
terrorist think.
Did you know you were thinking terrorist thoughts? That's why your
way is failing so horribly.
I guess cutting military budgets
helps get rid of terrorists.
I guess that you're a coward who doesn't feel safe unless you're
living in a military dictatorship.
No, I just like having a strong defence...something liberals like you don't
have a history of believing in.
You like having a useless defence. We have obliterated our own army
on a move that put this country in far more danger.
Being strong does nothing if you are stupid. Again you shut your eyes
tightly to ignore the overwhelming signs that you fucked up and *****
up farther. You have reduced this country from being a super power to
being completely impotent. What are we going to do about Iran -
nothing, there is nothing we can do but look stupid which is the
opinion of the middle east on Bush and America now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 06:25:22 PM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43ea6abf.289755468@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:00:26 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
"Reasoned Insanity"
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced
protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said
before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no
wonder.
LOL, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Clinton actually
worked on getting rid of Al Queda. To the point everyone thought he
was obsessed with it.
If that is so, why didn't he get rid of Bid Laden when he had the chance
to
get him handed over with a bow on his head.
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good. Lying under oath is
illegal
too, but he did that. I wonder how many other illegal activities he was
responsible for. Whitewater is one. Illegal campaign contributions are
another. There are probably more, but that's all I can think of right now.
I
wonder why Clinton has so much regard for not breaking the law to bring in
a
terrorist, but has so little regard for the laws in his own country.
This is exactly the problem with people like you. You think the ends
justifies the means. That's a sign of major stupidity and exactly how
terrorist think.
Did you know you were thinking terrorist thoughts? That's why your
way is failing so horribly.
I guess cutting military budgets
helps get rid of terrorists.
I guess that you're a coward who doesn't feel safe unless you're
living in a military dictatorship.
No, I just like having a strong defence...something liberals like you
don't
have a history of believing in.
You like having a useless defence. We have obliterated our own army
on a move that put this country in far more danger.
Being strong does nothing if you are stupid. Again you shut your eyes
tightly to ignore the overwhelming signs that you fucked up and *****
up farther. You have reduced this country from being a super power to
being completely impotent. What are we going to do about Iran -
nothing, there is nothing we can do but look stupid which is the
opinion of the middle east on Bush and America now.
So disarmorment makes up strong huh? You must have been beat up in school a
lot with views like that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 08:33:43 PM |
|
|
In article <tRRFf.2211$NR.383@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43ea6abf.289755468@news-west.newscene.com...
So disarmorment makes up strong huh? You must have been beat up in school a
lot with views like that.
only right wing crazies like you would link disarming with beating
people up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
06 Feb 2006 10:43:36 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-EC1D06.21334306022006@individual.net...
In article <tRRFf.2211$NR.383@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43ea6abf.289755468@news-west.newscene.com...
So disarmorment makes up strong huh? You must have been beat up in school
a
lot with views like that.
only right wing crazies like you would link disarming with beating
people up.
And only a left wing nut job like yourself would assume it isn't true.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
07 Feb 2006 12:23:31 AM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:00:26 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
"Reasoned Insanity"
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced
protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said
before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no
wonder.
LOL, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Clinton actually
worked on getting rid of Al Queda. To the point everyone thought he
was obsessed with it.
If that is so, why didn't he get rid of Bid Laden when he had the chance
to
get him handed over with a bow on his head.
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good. Lying under oath is illegal
too, but he did that. I wonder how many other illegal activities he was
responsible for. Whitewater is one. Illegal campaign contributions are
another. There are probably more, but that's all I can think of right now. I
wonder why Clinton has so much regard for not breaking the law to bring in a
terrorist, but has so little regard for the laws in his own country.
This is exactly the problem with people like you. You think the ends
justifies the means. That's a sign of major stupidity and exactly how
terrorist think.
Did you know you were thinking terrorist thoughts? That's why your
way is failing so horribly.
Reading most of your postings I can see you are not worth discussing an
issue with. You are FAR too biased and to the left and you have shown
major hypocrisy on your part.
But I do have one question for you.
You appear to be saying that there are no circumstances in which
choosing to break a law would be the right thing to do?
There are times in which sometimes for the better good (utilitarianism)
that we make choices that violate a law or rule.
Do you disagree or agree?
Remember, you said that it's a sign of major stupidity and exactly how
terrorist think if someone feels that there are times when it's
necessary to break a law or rule for the better good. Choosing lesser
evil over greater evil.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
07 Feb 2006 09:42:19 AM |
|
|
In article <1139293411.680539.232600@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Kate wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:00:26 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
"Reasoned Insanity"
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced
protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said
before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no
wonder.
LOL, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Clinton actually
worked on getting rid of Al Queda. To the point everyone thought he
was obsessed with it.
If that is so, why didn't he get rid of Bid Laden when he had the chance
to
get him handed over with a bow on his head.
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good. Lying under oath is
illegal
too, but he did that. I wonder how many other illegal activities he was
responsible for. Whitewater is one. Illegal campaign contributions are
another. There are probably more, but that's all I can think of right now.
I
wonder why Clinton has so much regard for not breaking the law to bring in
a
terrorist, but has so little regard for the laws in his own country.
This is exactly the problem with people like you. You think the ends
justifies the means. That's a sign of major stupidity and exactly how
terrorist think.
Did you know you were thinking terrorist thoughts? That's why your
way is failing so horribly.
Reading most of your postings I can see you are not worth discussing an
issue with. You are FAR too biased and to the left and you have shown
major hypocrisy on your part.
But I do have one question for you.
You appear to be saying that there are no circumstances in which
choosing to break a law would be the right thing to do?
There are times in which sometimes for the better good (utilitarianism)
that we make choices that violate a law or rule.
Do you disagree or agree?
Remember, you said that it's a sign of major stupidity and exactly how
terrorist think if someone feels that there are times when it's
necessary to break a law or rule for the better good. Choosing lesser
evil over greater evil.
That went over well.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
07 Feb 2006 11:13:47 AM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Reading most of your postings I can see you are not worth discussing an
issue with.
Which is the conclusion ***** Heishman comes to with EVERYBODY who
disagrees with him.
You are FAR too biased and to the left and you have shown
major hypocrisy on your part.
Anybody who disagrees with ***** Heishman is "FAR too biased and to
the left".
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
07 Feb 2006 07:25:38 AM |
|
|
osprey lied:
terrorist
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia Barclay" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
10 Feb 2006 07:21:41 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
Kate wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:00:26 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
"Reasoned Insanity"
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has been reduced
protects
us from terrorists? THAT'S what Clinton did to protect us. As I said
before,
you have no one better to offer and with logic like that, it's no
wonder.
LOL, apparently you haven't been paying attention. Clinton actually
worked on getting rid of Al Queda. To the point everyone thought he
was obsessed with it.
If that is so, why didn't he get rid of Bid Laden when he had the chance
to
get him handed over with a bow on his head.
Because, you stupid moron, that would have been illegal.
Want to back up that statement with some proof? Even if it was illegal
though, it would have been for the greater good. Lying under oath is illegal
too, but he did that. I wonder how many other illegal activities he was
responsible for. Whitewater is one. Illegal campaign contributions are
another. There are probably more, but that's all I can think of right now. I
wonder why Clinton has so much regard for not breaking the law to bring in a
terrorist, but has so little regard for the laws in his own country.
This is exactly the problem with people like you. You think the ends
justifies the means. That's a sign of major stupidity and exactly how
terrorist think.
Did you know you were thinking terrorist thoughts? That's why your
way is failing so horribly.
Reading most of your postings I can see you are not worth discussing an
issue with. You are FAR too biased and to the left and you have shown
major hypocrisy on your part.
But I do have one question for you.
You appear to be saying that there are no circumstances in which
choosing to break a law would be the right thing to do?
There are times in which sometimes for the better good (utilitarianism)
that we make choices that violate a law or rule.
Do you disagree or agree?
Remember, you said that it's a sign of major stupidity and exactly how
terrorist think if someone feels that there are times when it's
necessary to break a law or rule for the better good. Choosing lesser
evil over greater evil.
You're still a shameless liar, cross-dresser boy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: More Voter Fraud |
10 Feb 2006 10:00:22 AM |
|
|
Gaia Barclay wrote:
osprey wrote:
Kate wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:00:26 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43e6917a$0$58062$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
"Reasoned Insanity"
So reducing the military budget more than it ever has | | | | | | | | | | |
