Science > Abortion > Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Sound of Trumpet" |
| Date: |
27 Sep 2006 08:03:16 PM |
| Object: |
Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709046/posts
Mother of Seven Arrested Without Warning for Showing Abortion Image
LifeSiteNews ^ | 27 September 2006
Posted on 09/26/2006 10:54:14 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
FREDERICTON, New Brunswick, Sept. 27, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A
pro-life woman was arrested Tuesday for holding an image of an aborted
child outside an abortion facility in Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Suzie Ryan, mother of seven, was silently holding the image outside the
Morgentaler centre as abortions were being performed inside. Mrs. Ryan
was charged with violating s.163 of the Criminal Code. S.163 is about
the display of obscene material. She was released after being held in a
jail cell for several hours. She must face the charges in court in
November.
Prior to her arrest Mrs. Ryan was not warned in any way that she was
committing an illegal act. Six to eight police officers arrived and
forcibly put her in a paddy wagon, while confiscating her sign and
umbrella.
Police Staff Sergeant Kelly later explained to Mrs. Ryan's husband,
Campaign Life Coalition New Brunswick (CLCNB) president Peter Ryan,
that the police were acting following instructions from the Crown
Prosecutor office and some 35 complaints about the display of abortion
images. Mr. Ryan believes the abortuary staff must have put in one or
more complaints this morning.
CLCNB is not aware of any other case in Canada where a pro-life citizen
was arrested without prior warning for simply displaying an abortion
image in a public place. Such images have been repeatedly displayed by
such groups as Show the Truth which has won precedent-setting cases in
which it also was charged for showing graphic abortion pictures. That
group visited Fredericton twice this past summer. At the time
Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside expressed displeasure with the group's
tactics, but said there was nothing the city could legally do to
prevent such displays.
The Morgentaler abortion facility has no legal restrictions against
protest in the surrounding public area. Pro-life supporters regularly
are present on Tuesday mornings when abortions usually take place.
Mrs. Ryan says she is quite shaken by the incident.
Peter Ryan says it is incredible when someone can be accused of a crime
for peacefully protesting the murder of innocent children. "Here's the
analogy," he said. "The Nazi death camps are exterminating Jews.
Outside someone protests with an image of the Holocaust. The camp staff
complains to police. The person is arrested as a criminal. The
slaughter goes on. That's where we now are in this country.
.
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
08 Oct 2006 04:19:38 PM |
|
|
In article <cvdWg.6$O45.1@newsfe24.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote
I am "saying" that the "pro-life" are very big on forcing unwanted
children into the world and then doing NOTHING to take
responsibility for these children. They don't care about the
children. So the real question then is, "What is their motivation?"
#1) Yor first statement is an opinion -- and a biased oen at that. You have
NO evidence to support your opinion. None. Nada. Zip. Jack *****.
Prove it.
#2) Even if it were true, the second sentence would not be a necessary
conclusion.
Keep running.
#3) If you really wanted to know the answer to your third sentence, you'd
spend more time asking than demonizing.
Stop whining.
You're dismissed! NEXT!!!!!!!!!!
Are there really no "pro-lifers" able to defend their position?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter D" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
08 Oct 2006 07:08:20 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:081020061419382947%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <cvdWg.6$O45.1@newsfe24.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote
I am "saying" that the "pro-life" are very big on forcing unwanted
children into the world and then doing NOTHING to take
responsibility for these children. They don't care about the
children. So the real question then is, "What is their motivation?"
#1) Yor first statement is an opinion -- and a biased oen at that. You
have
NO evidence to support your opinion. None. Nada. Zip. Jack *****.
Prove it.
Ah, the tiresome chant of the terminally clueless. I cannot (and don't have
to) prove the negative. You made the claim. It's for you to prove the
positive. As for my statement, that yours is an opinion, that's proven. By
you when you expressed it.
Now, are you going to stand up for what you believe and prove it or are you
going to back-pedal and be my biotch? :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
09 Oct 2006 01:01:31 AM |
|
|
"Peter D" <please@.sk> writes:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:081020061419382947%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <cvdWg.6$O45.1@newsfe24.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote
I am "saying" that the "pro-life" are very big on forcing unwanted
children into the world and then doing NOTHING to take
responsibility for these children. They don't care about the
children. So the real question then is, "What is their motivation?"
#1) Yor first statement is an opinion -- and a biased oen at that. You
have
NO evidence to support your opinion. None. Nada. Zip. Jack *****.
Prove it.
Ah, the tiresome chant of the terminally clueless. I cannot (and don't have
to) prove the negative. You made the claim. It's for you to prove the
positive. As for my statement, that yours is an opinion, that's proven. By
you when you expressed it.
Now, are you going to stand up for what you believe and prove it or are you
going to back-pedal and be my biotch? :-)
Considering that you'd already dismissed him, it looks like you're acting like
the schmuck who serves a minor penalty, and once the penalty's done, breaks
out the door and runs over another opponent and gets sent back to the box.
(That actually happened tonight at Toyota Center, and the offender of the day
made a run at adding a misconduct to his collection. If you choose to adopt
that approach, that's your problem.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Iowa 6, Houston 3 (October 7)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, October 12 at Iowa, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
08 Oct 2006 07:59:48 PM |
|
|
In article <_ygWg.5926$dR.149@newsfe20.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:081020061419382947%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <cvdWg.6$O45.1@newsfe24.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote
I am "saying" that the "pro-life" are very big on forcing unwanted
children into the world and then doing NOTHING to take
responsibility for these children. They don't care about the
children. So the real question then is, "What is their motivation?"
#1) Yor first statement is an opinion -- and a biased oen at that. You
have
NO evidence to support your opinion. None. Nada. Zip. Jack *****.
Prove it.
Ah, the tiresome chant of the terminally clueless. I cannot (and don't have
to) prove the negative.
Easy to just mindlessly deny things isn't it?
You made the claim. It's for you to prove the
positive.
PROVE THAT. It was a positive statement.
As for my statement, that yours is an opinion, that's proven. By
you when you expressed it.
That is YOUR opinion.
Now, are you going to stand up for what you believe and prove it or are you
going to back-pedal and be my biotch? :-)
Nah. We'll just watch you keep being so chicken ***** that you feel you
are contributing by ask stupid questions.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carter" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing AbortionImage |
07 Oct 2006 08:16:33 PM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <OmUVg.4774$FV7.3227@newsfe14.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" wrote
Carter wrote
David W. Barnes wrote:
1) How many children have you adopted?
None, I raised three of my own.
So you don't take responsibility for caring for unwanted children.
This is a specious argument. What you want to imply is that his postion on
abortion is invalid because he's unwilling to adopt unwanted children.
I'm not "implying" anything. I am "saying" that the "pro-life" are
very big on forcing unwanted children into the world and then doing
NOTHING to take responsibility for these children. They don't care
about the children. So the real question then is, "What is their
motivation?"
Well,
***** to your attempt!
Great argument.
It has nothing to do with the abortion issue. I
might as well ask you how many homeless people live in your house in order
to invalidate your opinion on social services. IOW, it's worth *****.
If I was the one causing them to be homeless, you could ask that.
You "pro-life" are all alike. IRRESPONSIBLE.
Well, just keep advocating that we, as a society, force unwanted
children into the world and then wash our hands of them after they are
born. It fits you.
You know David, it is unfortunately typical that sooner rather
than later most pro abortionists run out of reasoned argument and
resort to ad hominem.
It seems that you have reached that threshold, that's too bad.
Bye guy, it's been a blast.
Carter
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
07 Oct 2006 08:26:45 PM |
|
|
In article <RjYVg.1914$cz.29105@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <OmUVg.4774$FV7.3227@newsfe14.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" wrote
Carter wrote
David W. Barnes wrote:
1) How many children have you adopted?
None, I raised three of my own.
So you don't take responsibility for caring for unwanted children.
This is a specious argument. What you want to imply is that his postion on
abortion is invalid because he's unwilling to adopt unwanted children.
I'm not "implying" anything. I am "saying" that the "pro-life" are
very big on forcing unwanted children into the world and then doing
NOTHING to take responsibility for these children. They don't care
about the children. So the real question then is, "What is their
motivation?"
Well,
***** to your attempt!
Great argument.
It has nothing to do with the abortion issue. I
might as well ask you how many homeless people live in your house in order
to invalidate your opinion on social services. IOW, it's worth *****.
If I was the one causing them to be homeless, you could ask that.
You "pro-life" are all alike. IRRESPONSIBLE.
Well, just keep advocating that we, as a society, force unwanted
children into the world and then wash our hands of them after they are
born. It fits you.
You know David, it is unfortunately typical that sooner rather
than later most pro abortionists run out of reasoned argument and
resort to ad hominem.
How was that "ad hominem?" It was merely an observation.
It seems that you have reached that threshold, that's too bad.
Excuse #692
Bye guy, it's been a blast.
If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen, eh?
:-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carter" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing AbortionImage |
07 Oct 2006 12:47:17 PM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <TTNVg.1624$cz.24467@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
None, I raised three of my own.
So you don't take responsibility for caring for unwanted children.
Now that's an extremely illogical assumption, if it is based on
anything I said.
2) If abortion were made illegal, would you support your taxes being
raised to pay for the health care of the mother and child, and the
education and expenses of the child? Would you support raising taxes
for child care so the woman can continue with her career?
In this country all of that is already being done. Do I support
it? Yes, with some reservations. I believe people should take
responsibility for their actions, i.e., raise your own children,
don't expect the taxpayers to do it for you because the taxpayers
didn't force you to conceive them.
They just, under your concept of the law, would be forced to bear the
child.
If they voluntary conceived it, yes.
There should be a social assistance program in place, as there is
in this country, as a safety net for those who, permanently or
temporally, through no fault of their own, are unable to afford
life's basic necessities. That I strongly support.
And what if it is their "fault?"
The net is still there and they are expected to correct the fault
as soon as possible and get on with their life and out of the
taxpayers pockets.
Carter
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
07 Oct 2006 04:32:22 PM |
|
|
In article <FKRVg.1747$cz.26023@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <TTNVg.1624$cz.24467@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
None, I raised three of my own.
So you don't take responsibility for caring for unwanted children.
Now that's an extremely illogical assumption, if it is based on
anything I said.
You support unwanted children being brought into the world but won't
adopt them after they are born.
2) If abortion were made illegal, would you support your taxes being
raised to pay for the health care of the mother and child, and the
education and expenses of the child? Would you support raising taxes
for child care so the woman can continue with her career?
In this country all of that is already being done. Do I support
it? Yes, with some reservations. I believe people should take
responsibility for their actions, i.e., raise your own children,
don't expect the taxpayers to do it for you because the taxpayers
didn't force you to conceive them.
They just, under your concept of the law, would be forced to bear the
child.
If they voluntary conceived it, yes.
What if they didn't "voluntary" conceive them? And how could we ever
know if they "voluntarily" conceived them?
There should be a social assistance program in place, as there is
in this country, as a safety net for those who, permanently or
temporally, through no fault of their own, are unable to afford
life's basic necessities. That I strongly support.
And what if it is their "fault?"
The net is still there and they are expected to correct the fault
as soon as possible and get on with their life and out of the
taxpayers pockets.
So, lets see. These women, "pro-lifers" often refer to them as whores,
are irresponsible. They want to "murder" their children. They are so
carefree that they can't even figure out how to use birth control. If
they could have, they would have killed their child before it was born.
And now you want to force them to care for these children that they
don't want, never wanted, and would like to kill.
Yep, you're "pro-life" alright...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter D" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
08 Oct 2006 03:39:54 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote
You support unwanted children being brought into the world but won't
adopt them after they are born.
You support abortion at the cost of the taxpayers. If you are such an ardent
supporter of "choice" support these women and pay for their abortions. How
many abortions have you paid for? How many poor have you fed? None? Right.
Typical "pro-choice"-er, always ready to put someone else's money where
their mouth is.
See, now do you get it?
<doubt it, but I can hope>
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
08 Oct 2006 04:19:39 PM |
|
|
In article <cvdWg.7$O45.4@newsfe24.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote
You support unwanted children being brought into the world but won't
adopt them after they are born.
You support abortion at the cost of the taxpayers.
It saves taxpayer money.
If you are such an ardent
supporter of "choice" support these women and pay for their abortions.
They do fine on their own. Haven't you been watching?
How
many abortions have you paid for? How many poor have you fed? None? Right.
Wrong.
Typical "pro-choice"-er, always ready to put someone else's money where
their mouth is.
Abortion saves taxpayer money. Get an education and get back to me.
See, now do you get it?
<doubt it, but I can hope>
Because a loudmouth who can't seem to support any of his positions says
so?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter D" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
08 Oct 2006 07:09:46 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:081020061419382970%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <cvdWg.7$O45.4@newsfe24.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk> wrote:
See, now do you get it?
<doubt it, but I can hope>
Because a loudmouth who can't seem to support any of his positions says
so?
I guess you didn't get it. Too bad. You should ask for a refund on whatever
you paid for your education.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
08 Oct 2006 07:59:47 PM |
|
|
In article <%ygWg.5927$dR.1301@newsfe20.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:081020061419382970%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <cvdWg.7$O45.4@newsfe24.lga>, Peter D <please@.sk> wrote:
See, now do you get it?
<doubt it, but I can hope>
Because a loudmouth who can't seem to support any of his positions says
so?
I guess you didn't get it. Too bad. You should ask for a refund on whatever
you paid for your education.
Or you should learn to express yourself.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carter" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing AbortionImage |
07 Oct 2006 08:11:20 PM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <FKRVg.1747$cz.26023@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <TTNVg.1624$cz.24467@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
None, I raised three of my own.
So you don't take responsibility for caring for unwanted children.
Now that's an extremely illogical assumption, if it is based on
anything I said.
You support unwanted children being brought into the world but won't
adopt them after they are born.
Where did I say I won't adopt them?
How many have you adopted?
2) If abortion were made illegal, would you support your taxes being
raised to pay for the health care of the mother and child, and the
education and expenses of the child? Would you support raising taxes
for child care so the woman can continue with her career?
In this country all of that is already being done. Do I support
it? Yes, with some reservations. I believe people should take
responsibility for their actions, i.e., raise your own children,
don't expect the taxpayers to do it for you because the taxpayers
didn't force you to conceive them.
They just, under your concept of the law, would be forced to bear the
child.
If they voluntary conceived it, yes.
What if they didn't "voluntary" conceive them?
The only way I know of that an involuntary conception could occur
is as the result of a rape. I believe that would be a good case
for abortion, for obvious reasons.
And how could we ever
know if they "voluntarily" conceived them?
If it wasn't rape it was voluntary.
There should be a social assistance program in place, as there is
in this country, as a safety net for those who, permanently or
temporally, through no fault of their own, are unable to afford
life's basic necessities. That I strongly support.
And what if it is their "fault?"
The net is still there and they are expected to correct the fault
as soon as possible and get on with their life and out of the
taxpayers pockets.
So, lets see. These women, "pro-lifers" often refer to them as whores,
are irresponsible. They want to "murder" their children. They are so
carefree that they can't even figure out how to use birth control. If
they could have, they would have killed their child before it was born.
And now you want to force them to care for these children that they
don't want, never wanted, and would like to kill.
That is so overstated it is 'not even wrong'.
Carter
.
|
|
|
| User: "junegill" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
08 Oct 2006 12:00:46 AM |
|
|
"Carter" <per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote in message
news:YeYVg.1911$cz.28817@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <FKRVg.1747$cz.26023@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <TTNVg.1624$cz.24467@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
None, I raised three of my own.
So you don't take responsibility for caring for unwanted children.
Now that's an extremely illogical assumption, if it is based on anything
I said.
You support unwanted children being brought into the world but won't
adopt them after they are born.
Where did I say I won't adopt them?
How many have you adopted?
2) If abortion were made illegal, would you support your taxes being
raised to pay for the health care of the mother and child, and the
education and expenses of the child? Would you support raising taxes
for child care so the woman can continue with her career?
In this country all of that is already being done. Do I support it?
Yes, with some reservations. I believe people should take
responsibility for their actions, i.e., raise your own children, don't
expect the taxpayers to do it for you because the taxpayers didn't
force you to conceive them.
They just, under your concept of the law, would be forced to bear the
child.
If they voluntary conceived it, yes.
What if they didn't "voluntary" conceive them?
The only way I know of that an involuntary conception could occur is as
the result of a rape. I believe that would be a good case for abortion,
for obvious reasons.
All conceptions are involuntary. No woman can make herself pregnant.
Everything to do with conception, pregnancy and the onset of labour is
initiated firstly by the ovum, and then by the zygote, embryo and foetus.
All that a woman can do is supply the opportunity.
And how could we ever
know if they "voluntarily" conceived them?
If it wasn't rape it was voluntary.
There should be a social assistance program in place, as there is in
this country, as a safety net for those who, permanently or
temporally, through no fault of their own, are unable to afford life's
basic necessities. That I strongly support.
And what if it is their "fault?"
The net is still there and they are expected to correct the fault as
soon as possible and get on with their life and out of the taxpayers
pockets.
So, lets see. These women, "pro-lifers" often refer to them as whores,
are irresponsible. They want to "murder" their children. They are so
carefree that they can't even figure out how to use birth control. If
they could have, they would have killed their child before it was born.
And now you want to force them to care for these children that they
don't want, never wanted, and would like to kill.
That is so overstated it is 'not even wrong'.
You're the one who says women who abort are irresponsible.
--
June G
# 364
http://uk.geocities.com/junegill@btopenworld.com/webpages/index.html.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
08 Oct 2006 12:16:31 AM |
|
|
In article <odGdnbciGLXUG7XYRVnytg@bt.com>, junegill
<junegill@btinternet.com> wrote:
"Carter" <per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote in message
news:YeYVg.1911$cz.28817@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <FKRVg.1747$cz.26023@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <TTNVg.1624$cz.24467@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
None, I raised three of my own.
So you don't take responsibility for caring for unwanted children.
Now that's an extremely illogical assumption, if it is based on anything
I said.
You support unwanted children being brought into the world but won't
adopt them after they are born.
Where did I say I won't adopt them?
How many have you adopted?
2) If abortion were made illegal, would you support your taxes being
raised to pay for the health care of the mother and child, and the
education and expenses of the child? Would you support raising taxes
for child care so the woman can continue with her career?
In this country all of that is already being done. Do I support it?
Yes, with some reservations. I believe people should take
responsibility for their actions, i.e., raise your own children, don't
expect the taxpayers to do it for you because the taxpayers didn't
force you to conceive them.
They just, under your concept of the law, would be forced to bear the
child.
If they voluntary conceived it, yes.
What if they didn't "voluntary" conceive them?
The only way I know of that an involuntary conception could occur is as
the result of a rape. I believe that would be a good case for abortion,
for obvious reasons.
All conceptions are involuntary. No woman can make herself pregnant.
Everything to do with conception, pregnancy and the onset of labour is
initiated firstly by the ovum, and then by the zygote, embryo and foetus.
All that a woman can do is supply the opportunity.
Also, what if the woman, or the man, use birth control and that fails?
Is that voluntary?
And how could we ever
know if they "voluntarily" conceived them?
If it wasn't rape it was voluntary.
There should be a social assistance program in place, as there is in
this country, as a safety net for those who, permanently or
temporally, through no fault of their own, are unable to afford life's
basic necessities. That I strongly support.
And what if it is their "fault?"
The net is still there and they are expected to correct the fault as
soon as possible and get on with their life and out of the taxpayers
pockets.
So, lets see. These women, "pro-lifers" often refer to them as whores,
are irresponsible. They want to "murder" their children. They are so
carefree that they can't even figure out how to use birth control. If
they could have, they would have killed their child before it was born.
And now you want to force them to care for these children that they
don't want, never wanted, and would like to kill.
That is so overstated it is 'not even wrong'.
You're the one who says women who abort are irresponsible.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
07 Oct 2006 08:26:45 PM |
|
|
In article <YeYVg.1911$cz.28817@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <FKRVg.1747$cz.26023@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <TTNVg.1624$cz.24467@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Carter
<per.ardua@ad.astra> wrote:
None, I raised three of my own.
So you don't take responsibility for caring for unwanted children.
Now that's an extremely illogical assumption, if it is based on
anything I said.
You support unwanted children being brought into the world but won't
adopt them after they are born.
Where did I say I won't adopt them?
You haven't.
How many have you adopted?
Irrelevant. I am not the one who advocates forcing women to give birth
to unwanted children.
2) If abortion were made illegal, would you support your taxes being
raised to pay for the health care of the mother and child, and the
education and expenses of the child? Would you support raising taxes
for child care so the woman can continue with her career?
In this country all of that is already being done. Do I support
it? Yes, with some reservations. I believe people should take
responsibility for their actions, i.e., raise your own children,
don't expect the taxpayers to do it for you because the taxpayers
didn't force you to conceive them.
They just, under your concept of the law, would be forced to bear the
child.
If they voluntary conceived it, yes.
What if they didn't "voluntary" conceive them?
The only way I know of that an involuntary conception could occur
is as the result of a rape. I believe that would be a good case
for abortion, for obvious reasons.
It isn't so obvious to many of the "pro-life." And what if they don't
say it was "voluntary?"
And how could we ever
know if they "voluntarily" conceived them?
If it wasn't rape it was voluntary.
But you said earlier that we can't assume that. We must have the
person admit to it first. Feel cornered? :-)
There should be a social assistance program in place, as there is
in this country, as a safety net for those who, permanently or
temporally, through no fault of their own, are unable to afford
life's basic necessities. That I strongly support.
And what if it is their "fault?"
The net is still there and they are expected to correct the fault
as soon as possible and get on with their life and out of the
taxpayers pockets.
So, lets see. These women, "pro-lifers" often refer to them as whores,
are irresponsible. They want to "murder" their children. They are so
carefree that they can't even figure out how to use birth control. If
they could have, they would have killed their child before it was born.
And now you want to force them to care for these children that they
don't want, never wanted, and would like to kill.
That is so overstated it is 'not even wrong'.
So your logic is falling apart.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SunDancer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing AbortionImage |
01 Oct 2006 03:06:54 AM |
|
|
Jeff Stapleton wrote:
"SunDancer" <Big_Bad_John@CompaniesStore.com> wrote in message
news:efnbtl$5ol$1@utornnr1pp.grouptelecom.net...
...when it comes to killing unborn children, Canada shows no mercy on
the child or pictures thereof.
get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as
you like to believe.
....Liberals used to believe, before Trudeau took power, that killing an
unborn child in the womb was murder and a crime, what made them change
their minds?
Peter D wrote:
What's most disturbing about this is that it places a chilling
stranglehold
on the right of expression and speech. Yes, the image is offensive,
but so
what? DON'T LOOK!
I hope a formal compaint is filed before the Human Rights Tribunal
and the
Police are forced to drop all charges. I'm disgusted that such a
non-aggressive act of protest was subjected to such harrassment in my
country.
Mother of Seven Arrested Without Warning for Showing Abortion Image
LifeSiteNews ^ | 27 September 2006
Posted on 09/26/2006 10:54:14 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
FREDERICTON, New Brunswick, Sept. 27, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A
pro-life woman was arrested Tuesday for holding an image of an
aborted
child outside an abortion facility in Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Suzie Ryan, mother of seven, was silently holding the image
outside the
Morgentaler centre as abortions were being performed inside. Mrs.
Ryan
was charged with violating s.163 of the Criminal Code. S.163 is about
the display of obscene material. She was released after being held
in a
jail cell for several hours. She must face the charges in court in
November.
Prior to her arrest Mrs. Ryan was not warned in any way that she was
committing an illegal act. Six to eight police officers arrived and
forcibly put her in a paddy wagon, while confiscating her sign and
umbrella.
Police Staff Sergeant Kelly later explained to Mrs. Ryan's husband,
Campaign Life Coalition New Brunswick (CLCNB) president Peter Ryan,
that the police were acting following instructions from the Crown
Prosecutor office and some 35 complaints about the display of
abortion
images. Mr. Ryan believes the abortuary staff must have put in one or
more complaints this morning.
CLCNB is not aware of any other case in Canada where a pro-life
citizen
was arrested without prior warning for simply displaying an abortion
image in a public place. Such images have been repeatedly
displayed by
such groups as Show the Truth which has won precedent-setting
cases in
which it also was charged for showing graphic abortion pictures. That
group visited Fredericton twice this past summer. At the time
Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside expressed displeasure with the
group's
tactics, but said there was nothing the city could legally do to
prevent such displays.
The Morgentaler abortion facility has no legal restrictions against
protest in the surrounding public area. Pro-life supporters regularly
are present on Tuesday mornings when abortions usually take place.
Mrs. Ryan says she is quite shaken by the incident.
Peter Ryan says it is incredible when someone can be accused of a
crime
for peacefully protesting the murder of innocent children. "Here's
the
analogy," he said. "The Nazi death camps are exterminating Jews.
Outside someone protests with an image of the Holocaust. The camp
staff
complains to police. The person is arrested as a criminal. The
slaughter goes on. That's where we now are in this country.
--
"TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions."
Quote: G. K. Chesterton.
http://www.avemariaradio.net/catholic-online-radio.php
http://www.catholicexchange.com/bday/index.html
http://www.fatimaradio.org/
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/rss/headlines.xml
A Medjugorje Message to Marija Pavlovic Lunetti from the Blessed
Virgin Mary in Bosnia-Herzegovina, the former communist
Yugoslavia. These are the messages from the last apparitions on
earth of the Blessed Virgin Mary who proclaims that these times
are a time of grace granted to mankind by God for the purpose of
conversion back to Him, when these apparitions of 25 years
come to an end, the ten Chastisements will begin for the renewal
of the world and mankind.
MESSAGE OF JUNE 25, 2006
"Dear children! With great joy in my heart I thank you for all
the prayers that, in these days, you offered for my intentions.
Know, little children, that you will not regret it, neither you
nor your children. God will reward you with great graces and you
will earn eternal life. I am near you and thank all those who,
through these years, have accepted my messages, have poured them
into their life and decided for holiness and peace. Thank you
for having responded to my call." 06/2006
MESSAGE OF APRIL 25, 2006
"Dear children! Also today I call you to have more trust in me
and my Son. He has conquered by His death and resurrection and,
through me, calls you to be a part of His joy. You do not see
God, little children, but if you pray you will feel His
nearness. I am with you and intercede before God for each of
you. Thank you for having responded to my call." 04/2006
--
"TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions."
Quote: G. K. Chesterton.
http://www.avemariaradio.net/catholic-online-radio.php
http://www.catholicexchange.com/bday/index.html
http://www.fatimaradio.org/
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/rss/headlines.xml
A Medjugorje Message to Marija Pavlovic Lunetti from the Blessed
Virgin Mary in Bosnia-Herzegovina, the former communist
Yugoslavia. These are the messages from the last apparitions on
earth of the Blessed Virgin Mary who proclaims that these times
are a time of grace granted to mankind by God for the purpose of
conversion back to Him, when these apparitions of 25 years
come to an end, the ten Chastisements will begin for the renewal
of the world and mankind.
MESSAGE OF JUNE 25, 2006
"Dear children! With great joy in my heart I thank you for all
the prayers that, in these days, you offered for my intentions.
Know, little children, that you will not regret it, neither you
nor your children. God will reward you with great graces and you
will earn eternal life. I am near you and thank all those who,
through these years, have accepted my messages, have poured them
into their life and decided for holiness and peace. Thank you
for having responded to my call." 06/2006
MESSAGE OF APRIL 25, 2006
"Dear children! Also today I call you to have more trust in me
and my Son. He has conquered by His death and resurrection and,
through me, calls you to be a part of His joy. You do not see
God, little children, but if you pray you will feel His
nearness. I am with you and intercede before God for each of
you. Thank you for having responded to my call." 04/2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff Stapleton" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
01 Oct 2006 10:50:34 AM |
|
|
"SunDancer" <Big_Bad_John@CompaniesStore.com> wrote in message
news:efnsr0$2un$1@utornnr1pp.grouptelecom.net...
Jeff Stapleton wrote:
"SunDancer" <Big_Bad_John@CompaniesStore.com> wrote in message
news:efnbtl$5ol$1@utornnr1pp.grouptelecom.net...
...when it comes to killing unborn children, Canada shows no mercy on
the child or pictures thereof.
get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as you
like to believe.
...Liberals used to believe, before Trudeau took power, that killing an
unborn child in the womb was murder and a crime, what made them change
their minds?
that was then this is now so i repeat.
get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as
you like to believe.
Peter D wrote:
What's most disturbing about this is that it places a chilling
stranglehold
on the right of expression and speech. Yes, the image is offensive, but
so
what? DON'T LOOK!
I hope a formal compaint is filed before the Human Rights Tribunal and
the
Police are forced to drop all charges. I'm disgusted that such a
non-aggressive act of protest was subjected to such harrassment in my
country.
Mother of Seven Arrested Without Warning for Showing Abortion Image
LifeSiteNews ^ | 27 September 2006
Posted on 09/26/2006 10:54:14 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
FREDERICTON, New Brunswick, Sept. 27, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A
pro-life woman was arrested Tuesday for holding an image of an
aborted
child outside an abortion facility in Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Suzie Ryan, mother of seven, was silently holding the image outside
the
Morgentaler centre as abortions were being performed inside. Mrs.
Ryan
was charged with violating s.163 of the Criminal Code. S.163 is about
the display of obscene material. She was released after being held in
a
jail cell for several hours. She must face the charges in court in
November.
Prior to her arrest Mrs. Ryan was not warned in any way that she was
committing an illegal act. Six to eight police officers arrived and
forcibly put her in a paddy wagon, while confiscating her sign and
umbrella.
Police Staff Sergeant Kelly later explained to Mrs. Ryan's husband,
Campaign Life Coalition New Brunswick (CLCNB) president Peter Ryan,
that the police were acting following instructions from the Crown
Prosecutor office and some 35 complaints about the display of
abortion
images. Mr. Ryan believes the abortuary staff must have put in one or
more complaints this morning.
CLCNB is not aware of any other case in Canada where a pro-life
citizen
was arrested without prior warning for simply displaying an abortion
image in a public place. Such images have been repeatedly displayed
by
such groups as Show the Truth which has won precedent-setting cases
in
which it also was charged for showing graphic abortion pictures. That
group visited Fredericton twice this past summer. At the time
Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside expressed displeasure with the
group's
tactics, but said there was nothing the city could legally do to
prevent such displays.
The Morgentaler abortion facility has no legal restrictions against
protest in the surrounding public area. Pro-life supporters regularly
are present on Tuesday mornings when abortions usually take place.
Mrs. Ryan says she is quite shaken by the incident.
Peter Ryan says it is incredible when someone can be accused of a
crime
for peacefully protesting the murder of innocent children. "Here's
the
analogy," he said. "The Nazi death camps are exterminating Jews.
Outside someone protests with an image of the Holocaust. The camp
staff
complains to police. The person is arrested as a criminal. The
slaughter goes on. That's where we now are in this country.
--
"TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions."
Quote: G. K. Chesterton.
http://www.avemariaradio.net/catholic-online-radio.php
http://www.catholicexchange.com/bday/index.html
http://www.fatimaradio.org/
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/rss/headlines.xml
A Medjugorje Message to Marija Pavlovic Lunetti from the Blessed
Virgin Mary in Bosnia-Herzegovina, the former communist
Yugoslavia. These are the messages from the last apparitions on
earth of the Blessed Virgin Mary who proclaims that these times
are a time of grace granted to mankind by God for the purpose of
conversion back to Him, when these apparitions of 25 years
come to an end, the ten Chastisements will begin for the renewal
of the world and mankind.
MESSAGE OF JUNE 25, 2006
"Dear children! With great joy in my heart I thank you for all
the prayers that, in these days, you offered for my intentions.
Know, little children, that you will not regret it, neither you
nor your children. God will reward you with great graces and you
will earn eternal life. I am near you and thank all those who,
through these years, have accepted my messages, have poured them
into their life and decided for holiness and peace. Thank you
for having responded to my call." 06/2006
MESSAGE OF APRIL 25, 2006
"Dear children! Also today I call you to have more trust in me
and my Son. He has conquered by His death and resurrection and,
through me, calls you to be a part of His joy. You do not see
God, little children, but if you pray you will feel His
nearness. I am with you and intercede before God for each of
you. Thank you for having responded to my call." 04/2006
--
"TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions."
Quote: G. K. Chesterton.
http://www.avemariaradio.net/catholic-online-radio.php
http://www.catholicexchange.com/bday/index.html
http://www.fatimaradio.org/
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/rss/headlines.xml
A Medjugorje Message to Marija Pavlovic Lunetti from the Blessed
Virgin Mary in Bosnia-Herzegovina, the former communist
Yugoslavia. These are the messages from the last apparitions on
earth of the Blessed Virgin Mary who proclaims that these times
are a time of grace granted to mankind by God for the purpose of
conversion back to Him, when these apparitions of 25 years
come to an end, the ten Chastisements will begin for the renewal
of the world and mankind.
MESSAGE OF JUNE 25, 2006
"Dear children! With great joy in my heart I thank you for all
the prayers that, in these days, you offered for my intentions.
Know, little children, that you will not regret it, neither you
nor your children. God will reward you with great graces and you
will earn eternal life. I am near you and thank all those who,
through these years, have accepted my messages, have poured them
into their life and decided for holiness and peace. Thank you
for having responded to my call." 06/2006
MESSAGE OF APRIL 25, 2006
"Dear children! Also today I call you to have more trust in me
and my Son. He has conquered by His death and resurrection and,
through me, calls you to be a part of His joy. You do not see
God, little children, but if you pray you will feel His
nearness. I am with you and intercede before God for each of
you. Thank you for having responded to my call." 04/2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carter" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing AbortionImage |
01 Oct 2006 11:25:15 AM |
|
|
Jeff Stapleton wrote:
"SunDancer" <Big_Bad_John@CompaniesStore.com> wrote in message
news:efnsr0$2un$1@utornnr1pp.grouptelecom.net...
Jeff Stapleton wrote:
"SunDancer" <Big_Bad_John@CompaniesStore.com> wrote in message
news:efnbtl$5ol$1@utornnr1pp.grouptelecom.net...
...when it comes to killing unborn children, Canada shows no mercy
on the child or pictures thereof.
get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as
you like to believe.
...Liberals used to believe, before Trudeau took power, that killing
an unborn child in the womb was murder and a crime, what made them
change their minds?
that was then this is now so i repeat.
get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as
you like to believe.
Whether you agree or not you have to understand that murder is a
legal concept, based on the values and morals of the majority of
a country's population. Abortion was always treated that way in
Canada, a legal concept based on the values and morals of the
majority of Canadians, until a minority of our population lobbied
hard enough to sway the opinion of our vote gathering legislators.
The fact that you are ignoring Jeff is that obviously a large
chunk of our population believe abortion should be treated as
murder, or at least a form of homicide.
Carter
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Loogie" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing AbortionImage |
09 Oct 2006 02:06:30 PM |
|
|
Jeff Stapleton wrote:
get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as you
like to believe.
According to Man's law you may be correct. According to God's law you
are wrong. God's law is the ultimate law. We all have to appear in His
court someday.
L
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tony Nicoya Mantler" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
09 Oct 2006 05:12:56 PM |
|
|
In article <ege6jj$jb9$2@news.datemas.de>, Loogie <boogieloogie@gmail.com>
wrote:
: Jeff Stapleton wrote:
:
: > get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as you
: > like to believe.
:
: According to Man's law you may be correct. According to God's law you
: are wrong. God's law is the ultimate law. We all have to appear in His
: court someday.
No mortal can honestly claim to speak for god, and that includes you. I'd rather
make up my own mind about what he does and doesn't approve of, and let him and I
sort it out when I get up there in person. (assuming he exists at all)
I think the world would be a much better place if more people did the same.
Cheers - Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler :)
--
Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler - Master of Code-fu
-- -- http://www.ubb.ca/ --
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TopPoster ." |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
10 Oct 2006 04:44:57 PM |
|
|
Which God? which religious organization are you with? remember we have many
religion in Canada and many Gods
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"Loogie" <boogieloogie@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ege6jj$jb9$2@news.datemas.de...
Jeff Stapleton wrote:
get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as you
like to believe.
According to Man's law you may be correct. According to God's law you
are wrong. God's law is the ultimate law. We all have to appear in His
court someday.
L
.
|
|
|
| User: "Loogie" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing AbortionImage |
12 Oct 2006 01:24:44 PM |
|
|
TopPoster . wrote:
Which God? which religious organization are you with? remember we have many
religion in Canada and many Gods
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"Loogie" <boogieloogie@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ege6jj$jb9$2@news.datemas.de...
Jeff Stapleton wrote:
get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as you
like to believe.
According to Man's law you may be correct. According to God's law you
are wrong. God's law is the ultimate law. We all have to appear in His
court someday.
L
There is only one true God and the only way to salvation is to accept
Christ as your personal saviour. I can teach you the ways of the Lord if
you will let Him into your heart.
L
.
|
|
|
| User: "TopPoster ." |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
12 Oct 2006 01:47:51 PM |
|
|
That what they all say, they cannot all be right, there is a lot of people
who will be disappointed
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"Loogie" <boogieloogie@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:egm19c$2kg$1@news.datemas.de...
TopPoster . wrote:
Which God? which religious organization are you with? remember we have
many
religion in Canada and many Gods
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin
once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held
dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded,
but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the
erroneous
"Loogie" <boogieloogie@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ege6jj$jb9$2@news.datemas.de...
Jeff Stapleton wrote:
get over it already abortion is legal in canada. It is not murder as
you
like to believe.
According to Man's law you may be correct. According to God's law you
are wrong. God's law is the ultimate law. We all have to appear in His
court someday.
L
There is only one true God and the only way to salvation is to accept
Christ as your personal saviour. I can teach you the ways of the Lord if
you will let Him into your heart.
L
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
30 Sep 2006 05:08:06 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:47:40 -0500, "Peter D" <please@.sk> wrote in
message <yFBTg.223$HO6.116@newsfe19.lga>:
What's most disturbing about this is that it places a chilling stranglehold
on the right of expression and speech. Yes, the image is offensive, but so
what? DON'T LOOK!
I hope a formal compaint is filed before the Human Rights Tribunal and the
Police are forced to drop all charges. I'm disgusted that such a
non-aggressive act of protest was subjected to such harrassment in my
country.
D'you know, I find it very 'odd' that only anti-abortion sites have
this story, and it's ALL the same verbatim text.
Mother of Seven Arrested Without Warning for Showing Abortion Image
LifeSiteNews ^ | 27 September 2006
Posted on 09/26/2006 10:54:14 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
FREDERICTON, New Brunswick, Sept. 27, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A
pro-life woman was arrested Tuesday for holding an image of an aborted
child outside an abortion facility in Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Suzie Ryan, mother of seven, was silently holding the image outside the
Morgentaler centre as abortions were being performed inside. Mrs. Ryan
was charged with violating s.163 of the Criminal Code. S.163 is about
the display of obscene material. She was released after being held in a
jail cell for several hours. She must face the charges in court in
November.
Prior to her arrest Mrs. Ryan was not warned in any way that she was
committing an illegal act. Six to eight police officers arrived and
forcibly put her in a paddy wagon, while confiscating her sign and
umbrella.
Police Staff Sergeant Kelly later explained to Mrs. Ryan's husband,
Campaign Life Coalition New Brunswick (CLCNB) president Peter Ryan,
that the police were acting following instructions from the Crown
Prosecutor office and some 35 complaints about the display of abortion
images. Mr. Ryan believes the abortuary staff must have put in one or
more complaints this morning.
CLCNB is not aware of any other case in Canada where a pro-life citizen
was arrested without prior warning for simply displaying an abortion
image in a public place. Such images have been repeatedly displayed by
such groups as Show the Truth which has won precedent-setting cases in
which it also was charged for showing graphic abortion pictures. That
group visited Fredericton twice this past summer. At the time
Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside expressed displeasure with the group's
tactics, but said there was nothing the city could legally do to
prevent such displays.
The Morgentaler abortion facility has no legal restrictions against
protest in the surrounding public area. Pro-life supporters regularly
are present on Tuesday mornings when abortions usually take place.
Mrs. Ryan says she is quite shaken by the incident.
Peter Ryan says it is incredible when someone can be accused of a crime
for peacefully protesting the murder of innocent children. "Here's the
analogy," he said. "The Nazi death camps are exterminating Jews.
Outside someone protests with an image of the Holocaust. The camp staff
complains to police. The person is arrested as a criminal. The
slaughter goes on. That's where we now are in this country.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SunDancer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing AbortionImage |
30 Sep 2006 05:54:32 PM |
|
|
IAAH wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:47:40 -0500, "Peter D" <please@.sk> wrote in
message <yFBTg.223$HO6.116@newsfe19.lga>:
What's most disturbing about this is that it places a chilling stranglehold
on the right of expression and speech. Yes, the image is offensive, but so
what? DON'T LOOK!
I hope a formal compaint is filed before the Human Rights Tribunal and the
Police are forced to drop all charges. I'm disgusted that such a
non-aggressive act of protest was subjected to such harrassment in my
country.
D'you know, I find it very 'odd' that only anti-abortion sites have
this story, and it's ALL the same verbatim text.
.... I'm surprised the baby killing pro-abortion sites only promote
pro-abortion propaganda!
Mother of Seven Arrested Without Warning for Showing Abortion Image
LifeSiteNews ^ | 27 September 2006
Posted on 09/26/2006 10:54:14 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
FREDERICTON, New Brunswick, Sept. 27, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A
pro-life woman was arrested Tuesday for holding an image of an aborted
child outside an abortion facility in Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Suzie Ryan, mother of seven, was silently holding the image outside the
Morgentaler centre as abortions were being performed inside. Mrs. Ryan
was charged with violating s.163 of the Criminal Code. S.163 is about
the display of obscene material. She was released after being held in a
jail cell for several hours. She must face the charges in court in
November.
Prior to her arrest Mrs. Ryan was not warned in any way that she was
committing an illegal act. Six to eight police officers arrived and
forcibly put her in a paddy wagon, while confiscating her sign and
umbrella.
Police Staff Sergeant Kelly later explained to Mrs. Ryan's husband,
Campaign Life Coalition New Brunswick (CLCNB) president Peter Ryan,
that the police were acting following instructions from the Crown
Prosecutor office and some 35 complaints about the display of abortion
images. Mr. Ryan believes the abortuary staff must have put in one or
more complaints this morning.
CLCNB is not aware of any other case in Canada where a pro-life citizen
was arrested without prior warning for simply displaying an abortion
image in a public place. Such images have been repeatedly displayed by
such groups as Show the Truth which has won precedent-setting cases in
which it also was charged for showing graphic abortion pictures. That
group visited Fredericton twice this past summer. At the time
Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside expressed displeasure with the group's
tactics, but said there was nothing the city could legally do to
prevent such displays.
The Morgentaler abortion facility has no legal restrictions against
protest in the surrounding public area. Pro-life supporters regularly
are present on Tuesday mornings when abortions usually take place.
Mrs. Ryan says she is quite shaken by the incident.
Peter Ryan says it is incredible when someone can be accused of a crime
for peacefully protesting the murder of innocent children. "Here's the
analogy," he said. "The Nazi death camps are exterminating Jews.
Outside someone protests with an image of the Holocaust. The camp staff
complains to police. The person is arrested as a criminal. The
slaughter goes on. That's where we now are in this country.
--
"TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions."
Quote: G. K. Chesterton.
http://www.avemariaradio.net/catholic-online-radio.php
http://www.catholicexchange.com/bday/index.html
http://www.fatimaradio.org/
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/rss/headlines.xml
A Medjugorje Message to Marija Pavlovic Lunetti from the Blessed
Virgin Mary in Bosnia-Herzegovina, the former communist
Yugoslavia. These are the messages from the last apparitions on
earth of the Blessed Virgin Mary who proclaims that these times
are a time of grace granted to mankind by God for the purpose of
conversion back to Him, when these apparitions of 25 years
come to an end, the ten Chastisements will begin for the renewal
of the world and mankind.
MESSAGE OF JUNE 25, 2006
"Dear children! With great joy in my heart I thank you for all
the prayers that, in these days, you offered for my intentions.
Know, little children, that you will not regret it, neither you
nor your children. God will reward you with great graces and you
will earn eternal life. I am near you and thank all those who,
through these years, have accepted my messages, have poured them
into their life and decided for holiness and peace. Thank you
for having responded to my call." 06/2006
MESSAGE OF APRIL 25, 2006
"Dear children! Also today I call you to have more trust in me
and my Son. He has conquered by His death and resurrection and,
through me, calls you to be a part of His joy. You do not see
God, little children, but if you pray you will feel His
nearness. I am with you and intercede before God for each of
you. Thank you for having responded to my call." 04/2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
30 Sep 2006 06:05:44 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:54:32 -0400, SunDancer
<Big_Bad_John@CompaniesStore.com> wrote in message
<efmsfa$e4j$1@utornnr1pp.grouptelecom.net>:
IAAH wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:47:40 -0500, "Peter D" <please@.sk> wrote in
message <yFBTg.223$HO6.116@newsfe19.lga>:
What's most disturbing about this is that it places a chilling stranglehold
on the right of expression and speech. Yes, the image is offensive, but so
what? DON'T LOOK!
I hope a formal compaint is filed before the Human Rights Tribunal and the
Police are forced to drop all charges. I'm disgusted that such a
non-aggressive act of protest was subjected to such harrassment in my
country.
D'you know, I find it very 'odd' that only anti-abortion sites have
this story, and it's ALL the same verbatim text.
... I'm surprised the baby killing pro-abortion sites only promote
pro-abortion propaganda!
Spare me. It's not on CBC, it's not on CTV, it's not on Global...
.
|
|
|
| User: "SunDancer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing AbortionImage |
30 Sep 2006 06:56:15 PM |
|
|
IAAH wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:54:32 -0400, SunDancer
<Big_Bad_John@CompaniesStore.com> wrote in message
<efmsfa$e4j$1@utornnr1pp.grouptelecom.net>:
IAAH wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:47:40 -0500, "Peter D" <please@.sk> wrote in
message <yFBTg.223$HO6.116@newsfe19.lga>:
What's most disturbing about this is that it places a chilling stranglehold
on the right of expression and speech. Yes, the image is offensive, but so
what? DON'T LOOK!
I hope a formal compaint is filed before the Human Rights Tribunal and the
Police are forced to drop all charges. I'm disgusted that such a
non-aggressive act of protest was subjected to such harrassment in my
country.
D'you know, I find it very 'odd' that only anti-abortion sites have
this story, and it's ALL the same verbatim text.
... I'm surprised the baby killing pro-abortion sites only promote
pro-abortion propaganda!
Spare me. It's not on CBC, it's not on CTV, it's not on Global...
....LOL, what did you expect?!?!? :)
--
"TOLERANCE is a virtue of a man WITHOUT convictions."
Quote: G. K. Chesterton.
http://www.avemariaradio.net/catholic-online-radio.php
http://www.catholicexchange.com/bday/index.html
http://www.fatimaradio.org/
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/rss/headlines.xml
A Medjugorje Message to Marija Pavlovic Lunetti from the Blessed
Virgin Mary in Bosnia-Herzegovina, the former communist
Yugoslavia. These are the messages from the last apparitions on
earth of the Blessed Virgin Mary who proclaims that these times
are a time of grace granted to mankind by God for the purpose of
conversion back to Him, when these apparitions of 25 years
come to an end, the ten Chastisements will begin for the renewal
of the world and mankind.
MESSAGE OF JUNE 25, 2006
"Dear children! With great joy in my heart I thank you for all
the prayers that, in these days, you offered for my intentions.
Know, little children, that you will not regret it, neither you
nor your children. God will reward you with great graces and you
will earn eternal life. I am near you and thank all those who,
through these years, have accepted my messages, have poured them
into their life and decided for holiness and peace. Thank you
for having responded to my call." 06/2006
MESSAGE OF APRIL 25, 2006
"Dear children! Also today I call you to have more trust in me
and my Son. He has conquered by His death and resurrection and,
through me, calls you to be a part of His joy. You do not see
God, little children, but if you pray you will feel His
nearness. I am with you and intercede before God for each of
you. Thank you for having responded to my call." 04/2006
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "panPiotrGlownia" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Of Seven Arrested Without Warning For Showing Abortion Image |
30 Sep 2006 09:20:51 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:08:06 -0400, IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:47:40 -0500, "Peter D" <please@.sk> wrote in
message <yFBTg.223$HO6.116@newsfe19.lga>:
What's most disturbing about this is that it places a chilling stranglehold
on the right of expression and speech. Yes, the image is offensive, but so
what? DON'T LOOK!
I hope a formal compaint is filed before the Human Rights Tribunal and the
Police are forced to drop all charges. I'm disgusted that such a
non-aggressive act of protest was subjected to such harrassment in my
country.
D'you know, I find it very 'odd' that only anti-abortion sites have
this story, and it's ALL the same verbatim text.
In Canada, the ZYD-controlled media do not want to publicise the fact that
their fellow ZYD MORGENTHALER makes so many millions of dollars, killing
babies!!
After all, Len Asper doesn't want to have these people picketing in front of
HIS house?
Mother of Seven Arrested Without Warning for Showing Abortion Image
LifeSiteNews ^ | 27 September 2006
Posted on 09/26/2006 10:54:14 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
FREDERICTON, New Brunswick, Sept. 27, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A
pro-life woman was arrested Tuesday for holding an image of an aborted
child outside an abortion facility in Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Suzie Ryan, mother of seven, was silently holding the image outside the
Morgentaler centre as abortions were being performed inside. Mrs. Ryan
was charged with violating s.163 of the Criminal Code. S.163 is about
the display of obscene material. She was released after being held in a
jail cell for several hours. She must face the charges in court in
November.
Prior to her arrest Mrs. Ryan was not warned in any way that she was
committing an illegal act. Six to eight police officers arrived and
forcibly put her in a paddy wagon, while confiscating her sign and
umbrella.
Police Staff Sergeant Kelly later explained to Mrs. Ryan's husband,
| | |