| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"words of truth" |
| Date: |
25 Jan 2006 04:43:27 PM |
| Object: |
Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net/features/prolife/frank_06.asp
The Ripple Effect of Abortion
by Fr. Frank Pavone
Abortion harms our entire culture in ways we have not even begun to
imagine. We may at times be tempted to think that we are not
individually affected by the fact that others legally abort their
children. But abortion does affect us all, personally and directly,
whether we are aware of it or not.
The pro-life movement has done much to teach the public about the
destructive harm that abortion does to the unborn child. Most people
also have been informed about the negative impact abortion has on
women's health, as a result of the multiple physical and emotional
complications of the procedure. But taking a brief look at the other
circles of destruction brought on by abortion can be an even more
sobering experience.
The Survivors
First of all, what does abortion do to the children who survive?
Psychologists have now discovered "Abortion Survivor Syndrome," a
cluster of symptoms that mimic those of the soldiers who return from
battle, and instead of feeling happy that they survived, feel guilty
and anxious. "Could I have done something to keep my army buddy from
getting killed? Why was it him and not me?"
Dr. Philip Ney, a Canadian expert and child psychiatrist, explains that
children eventually ask, "I was born because mommy wanted me. What if
she stops wanting me?"
The impact of being an abortion survivor should not be ignored as we
try to understand why children shoot other children in schools. We've
taught them to do so when we taught them that their lives were
disposable. Children will not stop killing children until parents stop
killing children.
The prospect that one could have been legally killed by his or her own
parents is also a significant obstacle for our young people to hear the
Gospel message of the Father's unconditional love for them.
From Generation to Generation
Abortion leads to more abortion, as well as to various forms of child
abuse. One of the biggest factors that will determine whether someone
will have an abortion is whether her mother had an abortion. The
reasons have to do with the way abortion affects the maternal bond. It
weakens and distorts it, and a woman who has an abortion faces
obstacles in her relationships with later children she brings to birth.
The act of aborting a child, rather than adjusting to the changes that
childbirth brings, constitutes a failure to mature and a regression in
one's development toward adult responsibility. This failure to mature
is one of the contributing causes of child abuse.
The Helpless Cry
Abortion threatens the survival of the human species itself, because it
introduces a distortion into the human response to the infant's
helpless cry. When a crying baby awakens her parents in the middle of
the night, initial annoyance quickly gives way to tenderness toward the
child in need. The very survival of the species depends on our overall
ability to make that transition. Abortion, by definition, is a
deliberate refusal to hear and respond to the helpless cry.
Dr. Ney writes, "Human response to the helpless cry of their young
will determine if the human species survives. The helpless cry is any
sound or signal that alerts a person that some creature is in distress
and cannot help him/herself . . . Anyone with any humanity in him or
herself must react in one way or another. The helpless cry is an
essential crisis . . . It is an accurate gauge of how human we are as
individuals and how civilized we are collectively. It will determine
whether we become more free, more mature, and more loving, or whether
we become insensitive, dehumanized, and hateful."
Marriage
Abortion destroys marriages and male-female relations generally. The
woman who has aborted a child finds it more difficult to trust the man.
Her relationship with him led to the unspeakable pain of abortion.
Meanwhile, the man finds in abortion an easy way to escape
responsibility for his actions. The fact that the law does not give
fathers a say in whether their own unborn children live or die means
that fathers are less willing to take responsibility for those children
before and after birth, and less willing to bond with them. If they are
not attached to the baby, moreover, they are not as supportive of their
partner.
Government
When our government allowed abortion, it became a different kind of
government than what it was founded to be. There are only two forms of
government. The first acknowledges that God gives us our rights, and
that government exists to secure those rights. In such a framework,
government can't tamper with the right to life, and can never
authorize its destruction.
The second form, however, says that government is the source of those
rights, and therefore has full dominion over life and death. The Pope
comments on this in Evangelium Vitae: "In this way democracy,
contradicting its own principles, effectively moves toward a form of
totalitarianism. The State is no longer the 'common home' where all
can live together on the basis of principles of fundamental equality,
but is transformed into a tyrant State, which arrogates to itself the
right to dispose of the life of the weakest and most defenseless
members. . . . When this happens, the process leading to the breakdown
of a genuinely human coexistence and the disintegration of the State
itself has already begun. . . . This is the death of true freedom"
(no. 20).
Abortion has wrought havoc on our political system, practically
destroying one of our national parties and hijacking the
constitutionally provided method for filling positions on federal
courts.
Other effects in law have been described as "the abortion
distortion." In various states, for example, pro-abortion forces have
begun to shut down avenues of free speech, such as specialty license
plate programs or tow banner advertising, just to prevent the truth of
abortion from being told.
The Church
The well-being of the Church is also at stake because of the abortion
controversy. The more the "ethic" of abortion is embedded in the
laws and practices of society, the more strained are the Church's
relations with government. The Church, after all, must interact with
government leaders on a wide range of programs that serve the people
and advance the Church's interests. But as was painfully evident in
recent controversies over whether pro-abortion politicians should be
allowed to receive Holy Communion or even appear on Church property,
the constant presence of legal abortion-and public officials who are
willing to keep it legal-will provide a source of continued conflict.
At the same time, positions on abortion are reduced, in public
commentary, to "political" positions. Given the fact that many
attorneys who advise the Church give unnecessarily restrictive legal
advice, the bottom line is that there is a chilling effect on the
freedom of the clergy-and others in ministry-to comment on
abortion. This strains the credibility of the Church, as people try to
figure out why more leadership is not evident from the pulpit on what
the bishops themselves have called the most fundamental civil rights
issue of our day.
The Medical Community
Legal abortion distorts the purpose and slows the progress of medicine.
Doctors are being reduced to their pre-Hippocratic oath days when they
were seen as dispensers of both life and death. The inherent link
between the medical profession and the care of life is being denied and
obscured. Moreover, if defects in a child are handled by aborting the
child, motivation to make medical progress in treating such defects is
deterred.
At the same time, if embryos can be destroyed, they can also be
manipulated, experimented on, sold, or combined with other species.
Bioethical oddities of immense proportions aThe fruit of abortion is
nuclear warre on the horizon.
Security
Ultimately, the economy and security of the nation and the world are
threatened by abortion. Destroying 40 million lives in a generation
can't happen without consequences, starting with the aging of the
population, with fewer younger workers supporting the system.
Moreover, how can we maintain peace between nations if we cannot
maintain peace between a mother and her own child? As Mother Teresa
warned, "If we say that a mother can kill her own child, how can we
tell other people not to kill each other? . . . The fruit of abortion
is nuclear war."
We have only skimmed the surface here and have truly not begun to
appreciate the destructive power of abortion. May we, as individuals
and as a society, face up to the truth about abortion and its many
dimensions before it is too late.
.
|
|
| User: "R. Pierce Butler" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
25 Jan 2006 08:49:24 PM |
|
|
"words of truth" <truth760@lycos.com> wrote in news:1138229007.757226.73910
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
Mother Teresa? The Ghoul of Calcutta?
You actually believe that *****?
I hope she suffered before she died.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 09:15:25 AM |
|
|
"words of truth" <truth760@lycos.com> wrote...
http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net/features/prolife/frank_06.asp
The Ripple Effect of Abortion
by Fr. Frank Pavone
Fat ***** Frank Pavone makes ***** up again.
Abortion harms our entire culture in ways we have not even begun
to imagine. We may at times be tempted to think that we are not
individually affected by the fact that others legally abort their
children. But abortion does affect us all, personally and directly,
whether we are aware of it or not.
There was no "pro-life" movement back when abortion was generally illegal in
the U.S. Nobody paid any mind if a well-to-do woman paid her doctor under
the table to take care of an unwanted pregnancy, and nobody gave a rat's *****
if a poor woman was injured or killed by a back-alley abortion performed by
an unqualified hack.
That's what the Fat ***** Frank Pavone and his "Priests for Lies" group
wants - they want abortion to be shameful and dangerous, just like in the
"good old days".
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. theendis@hand" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 09:37:07 AM |
|
|
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote in message
news:drap2g$9nb$0@pita.alt.net...
"words of truth" <truth760@lycos.com> wrote...
http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net/features/prolife/frank_06.asp
The Ripple Effect of Abortion
by Fr. Frank Pavone
(snip)
That's what the Fat ***** Frank Pavone and his "Priests for Lies" group
wants - they want abortion to be shameful and dangerous, just like in the
"good old days".
As opposed to government subsidized genocide.
The "good times", huh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 10:07:55 AM |
|
|
"John D." <theendis@hand> wrote...
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote...
That's what the Fat ***** Frank Pavone and his "Priests for Lies" group
wants - they want abortion to be shameful and dangerous, just like in
the
"good old days".
As opposed to government subsidized genocide.
WTF are you talking about?
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. theendis@hand" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 10:23:31 AM |
|
|
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote in message
news:dras4s$mov$0@pita.alt.net...
"John D." <theendis@hand> wrote...
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote...
That's what the Fat ***** Frank Pavone and his "Priests for Lies" group
wants - they want abortion to be shameful and dangerous, just like in
the
"good old days".
As opposed to government subsidized genocide.
WTF are you talking about?
WTF? I'm talking about what you're talking about. Killing babies.
You know, these little people:
http://www.scanbabies.com/html/gallery.html
So, WTF, are *you* talking about?
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 11:15:09 AM |
|
|
"John D." <theendis@hand> wrote in news:gK6Cf.10333$NE.5576@dukeread12:
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote in message
news:dras4s$mov$0@pita.alt.net...
"John D." <theendis@hand> wrote...
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote...
That's what the Fat ***** Frank Pavone and his "Priests for Lies"
group wants - they want abortion to be shameful and dangerous,
just like in
the
"good old days".
As opposed to government subsidized genocide.
WTF are you talking about?
WTF? I'm talking about what you're talking about. Killing babies.
You know, these little people:
http://www.scanbabies.com/html/gallery.html
So, WTF, are *you* talking about?
You anti-choice loons have a real fixation with "killing babies", it's
all you seem to talk about. You need to get some help from your nearest
mental health facility.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 12:41:04 PM |
|
|
"John D." <theendis@hand> wrote...
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote...
"John D." <theendis@hand> wrote...
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote...
That's what the Fat ***** Frank Pavone and his "Priests for Lies"
group
wants - they want abortion to be shameful and dangerous, just like
in
the "good old days".
As opposed to government subsidized genocide.
WTF are you talking about?
WTF? I'm talking about what you're talking about. Killing babies.
I wasn't talking about killing babies, liar.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 12:30:13 PM |
|
|
John D. <theendis@hand> wrote:
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote in message
news:dras4s$mov$0@pita.alt.net...
"John D." <theendis@hand> wrote...
"Spartakus" <no.spam@this.address> wrote...
That's what the Fat ***** Frank Pavone and his "Priests for Lies" group
wants - they want abortion to be shameful and dangerous, just like in
the
"good old days".
As opposed to government subsidized genocide.
WTF are you talking about?
WTF? I'm talking about what you're talking about. Killing babies.
You're either a sucker who believes lies or your a lunatic.
You know, these little people:
www.samanthasdolls.com
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank ODwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 02:46:34 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
John D. <theendis@hand> wrote:
You know, these little people:
www.samanthasdolls.com
LMAO! that is a keeper.
- Frank
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cleopatra" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 12:39:02 PM |
|
|
X-No-archive: yes
Spartakus wrote:
There was no "pro-life" movement back when abortion was generally illegal in
the U.S. Nobody paid any mind if a well-to-do woman paid her doctor under
the table to take care of an unwanted pregnancy, and nobody gave a rat's *****
if a poor woman was injured or killed by a back-alley abortion performed by
an unqualified hack.
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Yeppers, with Bolsheviks millions of deaths are just another statistic
when those doing the dying just so happen not to be grist for their
political ideology.
Anyway, about all your comments suggest is you feel if rich women can
murder their babies by virtue of their wealth and social connections,
so shouldn't poor women be able to do the same thing, and generally at
the public's expense. The morally proper stance is to deal with
abortion in a legally consistent manner across the board. This is what
we get from leftists who see every single issue solely in terms of
class and economic conditions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 01:03:40 PM |
|
|
"Cleopatra" <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> wrote...
Spartakus wrote:
There was no "pro-life" movement back when abortion was generally
illegal in
the U.S. Nobody paid any mind if a well-to-do woman paid her doctor
under
the table to take care of an unwanted pregnancy, and nobody gave a rat's
*****
if a poor woman was injured or killed by a back-alley abortion performed
by
an unqualified hack.
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Is that your argument? That people's apathy about abortion before Roe v.
Wade is OK, because it's not as bad as OUR apathy about Saddam's bad
behavior (and let's be honest here - NOBODY - right, left or center - and
certainly not you - was getting their britches in a bunch over Saddam's bad
behavior when Bush Senior described Saddam as "someone we can do business
with")?
Donald Rumsfeld facilitated the sale of chemicals to Saddam that enabled
Saddam to GAS THE KURDS.
Btw, civilian casualities in Iraq now amount to about a quarter of a
million, not "a few dozen".
Btw2, people are fleeing Iraq in droves, since conditions there are now
*worse* than they were under Saddam.
At the present, Bush Junior has found the government of Uzbekhistan to be a
convivial partner in diplomacy, etc, in spite of that government's
horrendous human rights record - including boiling its citizens alive.
Tell me about the crocodile tears again, fuckwit.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 02:57:58 PM |
|
|
Cleopatra <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> wrote:
X-No-archive: yes
Spartakus wrote:
There was no "pro-life" movement back when abortion was generally illegal in
the U.S. Nobody paid any mind if a well-to-do woman paid her doctor under
the table to take care of an unwanted pregnancy, and nobody gave a rat's *****
if a poor woman was injured or killed by a back-alley abortion performed by
an unqualified hack.
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
Everybody should remember that it was Rumsfeld who was shaking
Saddam's hand under the Reagan/Bush administrations. And that it was
those administrations who were selling WMD to Iraq.
It is, in fact, YOUR "gang" who have long been supporters of terrorism.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 12:50:06 PM |
|
|
On 26 Jan 2006 10:39:02 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
<Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com>
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Oh, no, Amanda, it's more like how your current masters, the Bush
Regime, did lots of business with Saddam and helped put him in power,
and now the Bush Regime trumped up a fake war on Iraq and sent in our
troops without proper body armor. Then the Bush Regime lied to the
world about WMD's, etc.
BTW, how's the weather in Winetka?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cleopatra" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 01:53:57 PM |
|
|
X-No-archive: yes
Bonnie ***** wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 10:39:02 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
<Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com>
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Oh, no, Amanda, it's more like how your current masters, the Bush
Regime, did lots of business with Saddam and helped put him in power,
and now the Bush Regime trumped up a fake war on Iraq and sent in our
troops without proper body armor. Then the Bush Regime lied to the
world about WMD's, etc.
We also did lots of business with Stalin in order to defeat the
Germans. So what? We saw it in our interests at that time to ally
ourselves with a lesser enemy, the Communists, to defeat a greater
enemy, the Nazis. Similarly we saw it in our interests to arm Iraq so
that she wasn't totally defeated by Iran, who was a fearful enemy then
and remains an even greater enemy today. When you're choosing up sides
in war, toots, you don't inquire which dictator loved his mommy best.
You deal with those ready, willing and able to take your fucking head
off or you perish, period.
As for Bush lying to the American people, to our knowledge he hasn't
yet perjured himself in a court of law or been impeached by Congress.
Nor has his administration told the American people ethnic cleansing,
genocide or that mass graves of hundreds of thousands of ethnic Muslims
existed in Yugoslavia as a pretense for bombing that country back into
the stone age for 78 days straight around the clock.
We are still looking for those HMGs (Hidden Mass Graves) over there.
What we've found 12 years later are a few *mass* grave sites numbering
in the mere dozens, the nationality of which bodies we cannot even
identify, and a likely phenomenon in any case in a country which
underwent decades of a brutal civil war. But this non-existent
*evidence* of Clinton and Halflbright's preposterous claims was enough
to satisfy you liberals who adored Bubba. Was it ever!
Yet here your gang is still at it demanding that unless Bush uncover
3,765 active nuclear plants with Plutonium recovery facilities,
stockpiled thermonuclear bombs in the 20 megaton class and warships and
aircraft carriers buried in the desert he fails to make his case. If
you hypocritical leftist frauds accepted the same level of proof from
Bush that you eagerly swallowed from Bubba, about all the guy would
have had to have done is produce three inactive hand grenades left over
from WWII discovered in some old lady's basement.
Cleopatra
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 02:59:10 PM |
|
|
Cleopatra <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> wrote:
X-No-archive: yes
Bonnie ***** wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 10:39:02 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
<Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com>
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Oh, no, Amanda, it's more like how your current masters, the Bush
Regime, did lots of business with Saddam and helped put him in power,
and now the Bush Regime trumped up a fake war on Iraq and sent in our
troops without proper body armor. Then the Bush Regime lied to the
world about WMD's, etc.
We also did lots of business with Stalin in order to defeat the
Germans. So what? We saw it in our interests at that time to ally
ourselves with a lesser enemy, the Communists, to defeat a greater
enemy, the Nazis.
Thank you for admitting that you will freely support mass murder in
order to further your own ends. It is a clear demonstration that
you will do anything, including lie, to futher your goal of fascism.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
27 Jan 2006 11:46:28 PM |
|
|
in article 43d9381e$0$58067$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net, Ray Fischer at
rfischer@sonic.net wrote on 1/26/06 3:59 PM:
Cleopatra <Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com> wrote:
X-No-archive: yes
Bonnie ***** wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 10:39:02 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
<Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com>
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Oh, no, Amanda, it's more like how your current masters, the Bush
Regime, did lots of business with Saddam and helped put him in power,
and now the Bush Regime trumped up a fake war on Iraq and sent in our
troops without proper body armor. Then the Bush Regime lied to the
world about WMD's, etc.
We also did lots of business with Stalin in order to defeat the
Germans. So what? We saw it in our interests at that time to ally
ourselves with a lesser enemy, the Communists, to defeat a greater
enemy, the Nazis.
Thank you for admitting that you will freely support mass murder in
order to further your own ends. It is a clear demonstration that
you will do anything, including lie, to futher your goal of fascism.
The only thing Cleo wants to further is getting some dumb men in her
own end...
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lefty" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
27 Jan 2006 04:33:44 AM |
|
|
Cleopatra wrote:
X-No-archive: yes
Bonnie ***** wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 10:39:02 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
<Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com>
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Oh, no, Amanda, it's more like how your current masters, the Bush
Regime, did lots of business with Saddam and helped put him in power,
and now the Bush Regime trumped up a fake war on Iraq and sent in our
troops without proper body armor. Then the Bush Regime lied to the
world about WMD's, etc.
We also did lots of business with Stalin in order to defeat the
Germans. So what? We saw it in our interests at that time to ally
ourselves with a lesser enemy, the Communists, to defeat a greater
enemy, the Nazis. Similarly we saw it in our interests to arm Iraq so
that she wasn't totally defeated by Iran, who was a fearful enemy then
and remains an even greater enemy today. When you're choosing up sides
in war, toots, you don't inquire which dictator loved his mommy best.
You deal with those ready, willing and able to take your fucking head
off or you perish, period.
Stunning hypocrisy. This after you just complained that others didn't
give a "fiddlers *****" about the people Saddam slaughtered (with US
assistance, I might add). These are the same people the US then used as
justification for their phony war. That this doesn't strike you as a
bitter irony and a disgusting fraud is telling.
You are an almost unbelievably vile individual.
.
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
27 Jan 2006 09:33:53 AM |
|
|
"Lefty" <Rude_Dictator@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1138358023.996349.287280@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Cleopatra wrote:
X-No-archive: yes
Bonnie ***** wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 10:39:02 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
<Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com>
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few
dozen civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Oh, no, Amanda, it's more like how your current masters, the Bush
Regime, did lots of business with Saddam and helped put him in power,
and now the Bush Regime trumped up a fake war on Iraq and sent in our
troops without proper body armor. Then the Bush Regime lied to the
world about WMD's, etc.
We also did lots of business with Stalin in order to defeat the
Germans. So what? We saw it in our interests at that time to ally
ourselves with a lesser enemy, the Communists, to defeat a greater
enemy, the Nazis. Similarly we saw it in our interests to arm Iraq so
that she wasn't totally defeated by Iran, who was a fearful enemy then
and remains an even greater enemy today. When you're choosing up sides
in war, toots, you don't inquire which dictator loved his mommy best.
You deal with those ready, willing and able to take your fucking head
off or you perish, period.
Stunning hypocrisy. This after you just complained that others didn't
give a "fiddlers *****" about the people Saddam slaughtered (with US
assistance, I might add). These are the same people the US then used as
justification for their phony war. That this doesn't strike you as a
bitter irony and a disgusting fraud is telling.
You are an almost unbelievably vile individual.
Is it possible to consider an entity with as many sockpuppets as
Cleo/Deo/Marie/etc. an "individual"? <g>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 03:50:33 PM |
|
|
On 26 Jan 2006 11:53:57 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
<Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com>
X-No-archive: yes
Bonnie ***** wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 10:39:02 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
<Rumprider_Ridge@hotmail.com>
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Oh, no, Amanda, it's more like how your current masters, the Bush
Regime, did lots of business with Saddam and helped put him in power,
and now the Bush Regime trumped up a fake war on Iraq and sent in our
troops without proper body armor. Then the Bush Regime lied to the
world about WMD's, etc.
We also
Thank you for your opinion/rationalization/excuse-making on behalf of
the Bush Regime.
<flush 2 end>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
27 Jan 2006 11:44:30 PM |
|
|
in article 1138305237.599786.258530@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Cleopatra
at wrote on 1/26/06 2:53 PM:
X-No-archive: yes
Bonnie ***** wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 10:39:02 -0800, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Cleopatra"
< >
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Oh, no, Amanda, it's more like how your current masters, the Bush
Regime, did lots of business with Saddam and helped put him in power,
and now the Bush Regime trumped up a fake war on Iraq and sent in our
troops without proper body armor. Then the Bush Regime lied to the
world about WMD's, etc.
We also did lots of business with Stalin in order to defeat the
Germans. So what? We saw it in our interests at that time to ally
ourselves with a lesser enemy, the Communists, to defeat a greater
enemy, the Nazis. Similarly we saw it in our interests to arm Iraq so
that she wasn't totally defeated by Iran, who was a fearful enemy then
and remains an even greater enemy today. When you're choosing up sides
in war, toots, you don't inquire which dictator loved his mommy best.
You deal with those ready, willing and able to take your fucking head
off or you perish, period.
As for Bush lying to the American people, to our knowledge he hasn't
yet perjured himself in a court of law or been impeached by Congress.
Nor has his administration told the American people ethnic cleansing,
genocide or that mass graves of hundreds of thousands of ethnic Muslims
existed in Yugoslavia as a pretense for bombing that country back into
the stone age for 78 days straight around the clock.
We are still looking for those HMGs (Hidden Mass Graves) over there.
What we've found 12 years later are a few *mass* grave sites numbering
in the mere dozens, the nationality of which bodies we cannot even
identify, and a likely phenomenon in any case in a country which
underwent decades of a brutal civil war. But this non-existent
*evidence* of Clinton and Halflbright's preposterous claims was enough
to satisfy you liberals who adored Bubba. Was it ever!
Yet here your gang is still at it demanding that unless Bush uncover
3,765 active nuclear plants with Plutonium recovery facilities,
stockpiled thermonuclear bombs in the 20 megaton class and warships and
aircraft carriers buried in the desert he fails to make his case. If
you hypocritical leftist frauds accepted the same level of proof from
Bush that you eagerly swallowed from Bubba, about all the guy would
have had to have done is produce three inactive hand grenades left over
from WWII discovered in some old lady's basement.
And this does...WHAT for Cleo, besides reach for her vibrator?
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
27 Jan 2006 11:40:37 PM |
|
|
in article 1138300742.790245.108600@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Cleopatra
at wrote on 1/26/06 1:39 PM:
X-No-archive: yes
Spartakus wrote:
There was no "pro-life" movement back when abortion was generally illegal in
the U.S. Nobody paid any mind if a well-to-do woman paid her doctor under
the table to take care of an unwanted pregnancy, and nobody gave a rat's *****
if a poor woman was injured or killed by a back-alley abortion performed by
an unqualified hack.
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Yeppers, with Bolsheviks millions of deaths are just another statistic
when those doing the dying just so happen not to be grist for their
political ideology.
Anyway, about all your comments suggest is you feel if rich women can
murder their babies by virtue of their wealth and social connections,
so shouldn't poor women be able to do the same thing, and generally at
the public's expense. The morally proper stance is to deal with
abortion in a legally consistent manner across the board.
and hope Cleo finds a man to knock her up before she gets too old...
Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
28 Jan 2006 01:24:30 AM |
|
|
Paul Duca wrote:
in article 1138300742.790245.108600@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Cleopatra
at wrote on 1/26/06 1:39 PM:
X-No-archive: yes
Spartakus wrote:
There was no "pro-life" movement back when abortion was generally illegal in
the U.S. Nobody paid any mind if a well-to-do woman paid her doctor under
the table to take care of an unwanted pregnancy, and nobody gave a rat's *****
if a poor woman was injured or killed by a back-alley abortion performed by
an unqualified hack.
Hmm, would this be sort of like your gang not giving a fiddler's *****
while Sadaam was busy torturing and killing millions of Iraqis for
decades and then all of a sudden crying crocodile tears for a few dozen
civilian casualties during our liberation of the ENTIRE country?
Yeppers, with Bolsheviks millions of deaths are just another statistic
when those doing the dying just so happen not to be grist for their
political ideology.
Anyway, about all your comments suggest is you feel if rich women can
murder their babies by virtue of their wealth and social connections,
so shouldn't poor women be able to do the same thing, and generally at
the public's expense. The morally proper stance is to deal with
abortion in a legally consistent manner across the board.
and hope Cleo finds a man to knock her up before she gets too old...
If he does, I hope she will do what decent women do, either have
the child and
marry the father or, if she doesn't want to keep the child then
adopt it out.
If the garbage who impregnated her refuses to live up to his
responsibilites, then
I hope she files a paternity suit against him and makes sure he
supports the child
until the child reaches adulthood. Anything else would be cowardly.
It's amazing that so many couples in the U.S. have to go abroad to
adopt a child
because there are not enough babies to adopt in their own country. I
know more than
one couple *and* single women who have gone to Russia, Romania and
other
countries to adopt because they couldn't find one here. Pity that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Malcolm" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
29 Jan 2006 02:00:49 PM |
|
|
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote
If the garbage who impregnated her refuses to live up to his
responsibilites, then I hope she files a paternity suit against him
and makes sure he supports the child until the child reaches adulthood.
Anything else would be cowardly.
No. There is no moral obligation to marry a woman because you have made her
pregnant.
That is not to say that often it isn't the right, loving thing to do. But
there is no obligation.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
29 Jan 2006 11:46:31 PM |
|
|
Malcolm wrote:
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote
If the garbage who impregnated her refuses to live up to his
responsibilites, then I hope she files a paternity suit against him
and makes sure he supports the child until the child reaches adulthood.
Anything else would be cowardly.
No. There is no moral obligation to marry a woman because you have made her
pregnant.
That is not to say that often it isn't the right, loving thing to do. But
there is no obligation.
He can't be forced to marry the woman he impregnated but he *can*
and should
be held responsible for the financial support until the child is an
adult and if he refuses,
as I said, the courts should force him to. Who *should* IYO be
responsible
for a child since it takes two to conceive one.
There is no such thng as a "single" mother, that happened only once
in recorded
history some 2000 years ago.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Malcolm" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
30 Jan 2006 05:38:17 PM |
|
|
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote
Who *should* IYO be responsible for a child since it takes two to
conceive one.
In Britian we've got to get away from the idea that you can have whatever
family structure you want, and the state steps in to support it.
Mother, father, and, crucially, grandparents should be jointly and severally
responsible for supporting the child. If they cannot agree how the child is
to be supported, the courts should step in and enforce a settlement. There
can be guidelines, but they should be just that. All of these people are
liable for the whole of the child's maintenance.
Only as a last resort, when none of these six people has any money, should
the state step in.
We should also be unashamed about making a distinction between a married
couple who are doing all they can for their children, but cannot earn enough
money, and the couple who choose an alternative lifestyle. The first should
be treated as respectfully and as sensitively as possible, the second should
pay for the alternative lifestyle.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
01 Feb 2006 05:52:25 PM |
|
|
Malcolm wrote:
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote
Who *should* IYO be responsible for a child since it takes two to
conceive one.
In Britian we've got to get away from the idea that you can have whatever
family structure you want, and the state steps in to support it.
Mother, father, and, crucially, grandparents should be jointly and severally
responsible for supporting the child. If they cannot agree how the child is
to be supported, the courts should step in and enforce a settlement. There
can be guidelines, but they should be just that. All of these people are
liable for the whole of the child's maintenance.
That's the way it used to be before idiots decided that it was the
responsibility
of the State to raise children insted of those who brought it into
the world.
Only as a last resort, when none of these six people has any money, should
the state step in.
We should also be unashamed about making a distinction between a married
couple who are doing all they can for their children, but cannot earn enough
money, and the couple who choose an alternative lifestyle. The first should
be treated as respectfully and as sensitively as possible, the second should
pay for the alternative lifestyle.
Many women are too weak to force the man, husband or whatever, to
support
them financially. It's easier to go to the generous taxpayer for
their living.
Killing the unborn child is usually because the "man" refuses to
live up to
his moral and legal obligations. Look at all the males who post
here in support
of this holocaust instead of making an attempt to save the life of
their own flesh
and blood. They, like the tart who kills her baby, are garbage.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
01 Feb 2006 08:28:50 PM |
|
|
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote
Who *should* IYO be responsible for a child since it takes two to
conceive one.
In Britian we've got to get away from the idea that you can have whatever
family structure you want, and the state steps in to support it.
Mother, father, and, crucially, grandparents should be jointly and severally
responsible for supporting the child. If they cannot agree how the child is
to be supported, the courts should step in and enforce a settlement. There
can be guidelines, but they should be just that. All of these people are
liable for the whole of the child's maintenance.
That's the way it used to be before idiots decided that it was the
responsibility
of the State to raise children insted of those who brought it into
the world.
Smirk. You want to force women to give birth to children then you
want to force them to raise the children.
Quite the control freak, aren't you?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
30 Jan 2006 12:03:53 AM |
|
|
wrote in
news:1138599991.254372.223300@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Malcolm wrote:
< > wrote
If the garbage who impregnated her refuses to live up to his
responsibilites, then I hope she files a paternity suit against him
and makes sure he supports the child until the child reaches
adulthood. Anything else would be cowardly.
No. There is no moral obligation to marry a woman because you have
made her pregnant.
That is not to say that often it isn't the right, loving thing to do.
But there is no obligation.
He can't be forced to marry the woman he impregnated but he *can*
and should
be held responsible for the financial support until the child is
an
adult and if he refuses,
as I said, the courts should force him to. Who *should* IYO be
responsible
for a child since it takes two to conceive one.
What's the matter Blowsdics, still can't find out who your real father
might have been? Check out skid row again.
There is no such thng as a "single" mother, that happened only
once
in recorded
history some 2000 years ago.
Prove it, Blowsdics.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: Took money from Baby Doc Duvalier |
26 Jan 2006 09:06:17 AM |
|
|
In article <1138229007.757226.73910@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
truth760@lycos.com says...
"If we say that a mother can kill her own child, how can we
tell other people not to kill each other? . . . The fruit of abortion
is nuclear war."
And that verifiably shows what a stupid *****, fraud and false
prophet Motherfucking Theresa (thanks, Penn and Teller) truly was. Her
idiotic conclusion is, unsurprisingly, effortlessly refuted. The only
nuclear weapons that were ever used in war were used in 1945, when
abortion was not legal in much of the US or many other places. In
particular, abortion was banned by the Axis powers we were fighting
against, as an expedient to increase the long term manpower (read: cannon
fodder) of heir armies. Furthermore, we avoided nuclear war for over
half a century, despite the fact that we legalized abortion over 30 years
ago. Note that many of the times we can closest to nuclear war, such as
in the Korean War, The Cuban Missile Crisis, or even at points in the
Vietnam War, was still before Roe v Wade. Thus, her moronic comment is
utterly without validity and refuted by the facts.
Of course, this is coming from a poorly educated, sadistic little
gnomish ***** who rampantly stole money from the poor and then funneled
it into building convents, instead of helping the poor. She didn't mind
taking money from mass murderers like "Baby Doc" Duvalier and criminals
like Charles Keating, which she then used, not for the poor, but
funnelled into Vatican coffers and a variety of other questionable areas.
She took money that people thought was going to feeding and helping the
poor or dying and used it to train new exploiters. She denied her own
nuns the use of pain medication, so that they could experience "the
suffering of christ". Her hospices were squalid little dehumanizing
religious torture chambers where people were cut off from their families
and the outside world.
Finally, after living a lie all her life, the Vatican is now
engaged in spinning lies about motherfucking Theresa to make her a
"saint". Pope John Pollack the Senile lowered the requirement for
sainthood from two "miracles" to one. Vatican spin doctors have only
managed to find one Bengali woman who claims that after mother theresa
was already dead for a year, a trinket with that *****'s image on it
"cured" her of cancer. She claimed this despite the fact that she got
elaborate medical treatment on the side. That's the kind of "saint"
motherfucking Theresa was.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
28 Jan 2006 04:45:18 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jan 2006 14:43:27 -0800 words of truth wrote in:
----- deletia -----
Typical pseudo-prophesy ramblings....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kashmir" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
27 Jan 2006 05:55:18 PM |
|
|
On 25 Jan 2006 14:43:27 -0800, "words of truth" <truth760@lycos.com>
wrote:
http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net/features/prolife/frank_06.asp
The Ripple Effect of Abortion
by Fr. Frank Pavone
Abortion harms our entire culture in ways we have not even begun to
imagine. We may at times be tempted to think that we are not
individually affected by the fact that others legally abort their
children. But abortion does affect us all, personally and directly,
whether we are aware of it or not.
The pro-life movement has done much to teach the public about the
destructive harm that abortion does to the unborn child. Most people
also have been informed about the negative impact abortion has on
women's health, as a result of the multiple physical and emotional
complications of the procedure. But taking a brief look at the other
circles of destruction brought on by abortion can be an even more
sobering experience.
The Survivors
First of all, what does abortion do to the children who survive?
Psychologists have now discovered "Abortion Survivor Syndrome," a
cluster of symptoms that mimic those of the soldiers who return from
battle, and instead of feeling happy that they survived, feel guilty
and anxious. "Could I have done something to keep my army buddy from
getting killed? Why was it him and not me?"
Dr. Philip Ney, a Canadian expert and child psychiatrist, explains that
children eventually ask, "I was born because mommy wanted me. What if
she stops wanting me?"
The impact of being an abortion survivor should not be ignored as we
try to understand why children shoot other children in schools. We've
taught them to do so when we taught them that their lives were
disposable. Children will not stop killing children until parents stop
killing children.
The prospect that one could have been legally killed by his or her own
parents is also a significant obstacle for our young people to hear the
Gospel message of the Father's unconditional love for them.
From Generation to Generation
Abortion leads to more abortion, as well as to various forms of child
abuse. One of the biggest factors that will determine whether someone
will have an abortion is whether her mother had an abortion. The
reasons have to do with the way abortion affects the maternal bond. It
weakens and distorts it, and a woman who has an abortion faces
obstacles in her relationships with later children she brings to birth.
The act of aborting a child, rather than adjusting to the changes that
childbirth brings, constitutes a failure to mature and a regression in
one's development toward adult responsibility. This failure to mature
is one of the contributing causes of child abuse.
The Helpless Cry
Abortion threatens the survival of the human species itself, because it
introduces a distortion into the human response to the infant's
helpless cry. When a crying baby awakens her parents in the middle of
the night, initial annoyance quickly gives way to tenderness toward the
child in need. The very survival of the species depends on our overall
ability to make that transition. Abortion, by definition, is a
deliberate refusal to hear and respond to the helpless cry.
Dr. Ney writes, "Human response to the helpless cry of their young
will determine if the human species survives. The helpless cry is any
sound or signal that alerts a person that some creature is in distress
and cannot help him/herself . . . Anyone with any humanity in him or
herself must react in one way or another. The helpless cry is an
essential crisis . . . It is an accurate gauge of how human we are as
individuals and how civilized we are collectively. It will determine
whether we become more free, more mature, and more loving, or whether
we become insensitive, dehumanized, and hateful."
Marriage
Abortion destroys marriages and male-female relations generally. The
woman who has aborted a child finds it more difficult to trust the man.
Her relationship with him led to the unspeakable pain of abortion.
Meanwhile, the man finds in abortion an easy way to escape
responsibility for his actions. The fact that the law does not give
fathers a say in whether their own unborn children live or die means
that fathers are less willing to take responsibility for those children
before and after birth, and less willing to bond with them. If they are
not attached to the baby, moreover, they are not as supportive of their
partner.
Government
When our government allowed abortion, it became a different kind of
government than what it was founded to be. There are only two forms of
government. The first acknowledges that God gives us our rights, and
that government exists to secure those rights. In such a framework,
government can't tamper with the right to life, and can never
authorize its destruction.
The second form, however, says that government is the source of those
rights, and therefore has full dominion over life and death. The Pope
comments on this in Evangelium Vitae: "In this way democracy,
contradicting its own principles, effectively moves toward a form of
totalitarianism. The State is no longer the 'common home' where all
can live together on the basis of principles of fundamental equality,
but is transformed into a tyrant State, which arrogates to itself the
right to dispose of the life of the weakest and most defenseless
members. . . . When this happens, the process leading to the breakdown
of a genuinely human coexistence and the disintegration of the State
itself has already begun. . . . This is the death of true freedom"
(no. 20).
Abortion has wrought havoc on our political system, practically
destroying one of our national parties and hijacking the
constitutionally provided method for filling positions on federal
courts.
Other effects in law have been described as "the abortion
distortion." In various states, for example, pro-abortion forces have
begun to shut down avenues of free speech, such as specialty license
plate programs or tow banner advertising, just to prevent the truth of
abortion from being told.
The Church
The well-being of the Church is also at stake because of the abortion
controversy. The more the "ethic" of abortion is embedded in the
laws and practices of society, the more strained are the Church's
relations with government. The Church, after all, must interact with
government leaders on a wide range of programs that serve the people
and advance the Church's interests. But as was painfully evident in
recent controversies over whether pro-abortion politicians should be
allowed to receive Holy Communion or even appear on Church property,
the constant presence of legal abortion-and public officials who are
willing to keep it legal-will provide a source of continued conflict.
At the same time, positions on abortion are reduced, in public
commentary, to "political" positions. Given the fact that many
attorneys who advise the Church give unnecessarily restrictive legal
advice, the bottom line is that there is a chilling effect on the
freedom of the clergy-and others in ministry-to comment on
abortion. This strains the credibility of the Church, as people try to
figure out why more leadership is not evident from the pulpit on what
the bishops themselves have called the most fundamental civil rights
issue of our day.
The Medical Community
Legal abortion distorts the purpose and slows the progress of medicine.
Doctors are being reduced to their pre-Hippocratic oath days when they
were seen as dispensers of both life and death. The inherent link
between the medical profession and the care of life is being denied and
obscured. Moreover, if defects in a child are handled by aborting the
child, motivation to make medical progress in treating such defects is
deterred.
At the same time, if embryos can be destroyed, they can also be
manipulated, experimented on, sold, or combined with other species.
Bioethical oddities of immense proportions aThe fruit of abortion is
nuclear warre on the horizon.
Security
Ultimately, the economy and security of the nation and the world are
threatened by abortion. Destroying 40 million lives in a generation
can't happen without consequences, starting with the aging of the
population, with fewer younger workers supporting the system.
Moreover, how can we maintain peace between nations if we cannot
maintain peace between a mother and her own child? As Mother Teresa
warned, "If we say that a mother can kill her own child, how can we
tell other people not to kill each other? . . . The fruit of abortion
is nuclear war."
We have only skimmed the surface here and have truly not begun to
appreciate the destructive power of abortion. May we, as individuals
and as a society, face up to the truth about abortion and its many
dimensions before it is too late.
Oh please. take your fucking crucifix and go away, will you?
Abortion leads to nuclear war?
What a fucking moron.
--
Kashmir
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Mother Theresa: The Fruit Of Abortion Is Nuclear War |
26 Jan 2006 06:53:48 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:43:27 -0800, words of truth wrote:
http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net/features/prolife/frank_06.asp
The Ripple Effect of Abortion
by Fr. Frank Pavone
The Fruit of Outlawing Abortion is a country full of poor, starving people.
--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|