| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
17 Apr 2007 11:47:41 AM |
| Object: |
Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder "What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it differently.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
.
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
17 Apr 2007 08:39:56 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder "What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is trying to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and their gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal ***** unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ScottyFLL" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
17 Apr 2007 09:06:42 PM |
|
|
On Apr 17, 9:39 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder "What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is trying to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and their gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal ***** unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.-
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers and produce-throwers, must
be punished for their anti-social behavior. Ms. Adler must be very
proud of herself -- she will have a permanent public record of her
astounding feat.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
17 Apr 2007 09:33:51 PM |
|
|
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 9:39 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder "What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no
firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is trying to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and their
gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal *****
unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.-
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
and produce-throwers,
Any person can throw produce any time they want to without breaking any
laws.
must be punished for their anti-social behavior.
The law does not allow punishing persons who caused no actual harm.
Ms. Adler must be very proud of herself
If pride is a crime then Gay Pride must be punished, right?
-- she will have a permanent public record of her
astounding feat.
Check those Constitutional rights.
She is NOT GUILTY unless she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
17 Apr 2007 10:13:08 PM |
|
|
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 9:39 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder "What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no
firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is trying to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and their
gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal *****
unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.-
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers. Since you cannot manage to control yourself you
will be controlled by others.
Enjoy your stay in prison.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 08:31:21 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 9:39 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder
"What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free
from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at
which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than
discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no
firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is trying to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and their
gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal *****
unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.-
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we, you perverted abortionistic homoseuxal ***** piece of dogshit?
Since you cannot manage to control yourself you
will be controlled by others.
Nah, idiot. it is the cowards of abortion and homosexuality that aren't
controlling themselves.
I have the full legal right to self-defense to ward off any person who
attacks me.
It matters nothing whether they are public or private citizens.
Control yourself, you ingracious ***** or YOU WILL BE CONTROLLLED!
Enjoy your stay in prison.
I'm not going to prison, you COWARD!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 10:05:28 AM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
[...]
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we, you perverted abortionistic homoseuxal ***** piece of dogshit?
The sane population of this country - which you have removed yourself from, to
all appearances.
Since you cannot manage to control yourself you
will be controlled by others.
Nah, idiot. it is the cowards of abortion and homosexuality that aren't
controlling themselves.
Let's see...I've been pro-choice since you were in third grade or so, and you
know how many abortions I've been involved in as a participant? It's a number
that sums up your credibility: zero.
I have the full legal right to self-defense to ward off any person who
attacks me.
No one agrees with you.
It matters nothing whether they are public or private citizens.
Control yourself, you ingracious ***** or YOU WILL BE CONTROLLLED!
By a raving whackjob in South Carolina? Keep on piling up the evidence that
you're delusional.
Enjoy your stay in prison.
I'm not going to prison, you COWARD!
More likely, you'll be in SC's equivalent to our Rusk State Hospital for the
rest of your life. (I'd wonder if there's a bit of concern at Furman, after
the massacre at VPI...)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 07:41:08 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz15afk7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
[...]
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want
to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we, you perverted abortionistic homoseuxal ***** piece of dogshit?
The sane population of this country - which you have removed yourself
from, to
all appearances.
Since you cannot manage to control yourself you
will be controlled by others.
Nah, idiot. it is the cowards of abortion and homosexuality that aren't
controlling themselves.
Let's see...I've been pro-choice since you were in third grade or so, and
you
know how many abortions I've been involved in as a participant? It's a
number
that sums up your credibility: zero.
I have the full legal right to self-defense to ward off any person who
attacks me.
No one agrees with you.
Ridiculous.
Not agreeing with me on that one is like going against yourself.
It matters nothing whether they are public or private citizens.
Control yourself, you ingracious ***** or YOU WILL BE CONTROLLLED!
By a raving whackjob in South Carolina?
Probably by whoever feels like doing it.
Keep on piling up the evidence that
you're delusional.
You are who is piling up evidence of your psychological instabilities.
Enjoy your stay in prison.
I'm not going to prison, you COWARD!
More likely, you'll be in SC's equivalent to our Rusk State Hospital for
the
rest of your life. (I'd wonder if there's a bit of concern at Furman,
after
the massacre at VPI...)
Nah, Check that partial-birth abortion ban now.
And, check all those lower-court rulings that said it was unconstitutional.
Looks like those lower court decrees have been cast down and out.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 08:12:01 PM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz15afk7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
[...]
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we, you perverted abortionistic homoseuxal ***** piece of dogshit?
The sane population of this country - which you have removed yourself from,
to all appearances.
Couldn't respond to that? I'm not surprised.
Since you cannot manage to control yourself you will be controlled by
others.
Nah, idiot. it is the cowards of abortion and homosexuality that aren't
controlling themselves.
Let's see...I've been pro-choice since you were in third grade or so, and
you know how many abortions I've been involved in as a participant? It's a
number that sums up your credibility: zero.
No response to that, either? Ignoring reality doesn't make it go away.
I have the full legal right to self-defense to ward off any person who
attacks me.
No one agrees with you.
Ridiculous. Not agreeing with me on that one is like going against yourself.
You're insane. On the rare occasions that you're actually right, it's nothing
more than the laws of probability.
It matters nothing whether they are public or private citizens.
Control yourself, you ingracious ***** or YOU WILL BE CONTROLLLED!
By a raving whackjob in South Carolina?
Probably by whoever feels like doing it.
This ridgerunner returns fire.
Keep on piling up the evidence that you're delusional.
You are who is piling up evidence of your psychological instabilities.
....for a Wentzky "definition" of the term.
Enjoy your stay in prison.
I'm not going to prison, you COWARD!
More likely, you'll be in SC's equivalent to our Rusk State Hospital for
the rest of your life. (I'd wonder if there's a bit of concern at Furman,
after the massacre at VPI...)
Nah, Check that partial-birth abortion ban now.
....which has what to do with Furman? After what happened Monday morning at
VPI, I'd suspect that someone at Furman might well be concerned about one of
their alumni who is acting like the perp in Blacksburg.
And, check all those lower-court rulings that said it was unconstitutional.
Looks like those lower court decrees have been cast down and out.
....which won't make a change at all, as those are rare to the point of not
having any influence on abortion stats...because (your delusions aside) women
don't just decide to abort late-term on the spur of the moment. No study has
ever been able to document that.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 08:48:20 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkk5w96uce.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz15afk7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
[...]
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want
to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm
to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we, you perverted abortionistic homoseuxal ***** piece of
dogshit?
The sane population of this country - which you have removed yourself
from,
to all appearances.
Couldn't respond to that? I'm not surprised.
Since you cannot manage to control yourself you will be controlled by
others.
Nah, idiot. it is the cowards of abortion and homosexuality that aren't
controlling themselves.
Let's see...I've been pro-choice since you were in third grade or so,
and
you know how many abortions I've been involved in as a participant?
It's a
number that sums up your credibility: zero.
No response to that, either? Ignoring reality doesn't make it go away.
I have the full legal right to self-defense to ward off any person who
attacks me.
No one agrees with you.
Ridiculous. Not agreeing with me on that one is like going against
yourself.
You're insane. On the rare occasions that you're actually right, it's
nothing
more than the laws of probability.
It matters nothing whether they are public or private citizens.
Control yourself, you ingracious ***** or YOU WILL BE CONTROLLLED!
By a raving whackjob in South Carolina?
Probably by whoever feels like doing it.
This ridgerunner returns fire.
So, how is it you think no one agrees with "I have the full legal right to
self-defense to ward off any person who
attacks me." if you are someone?
Keep on piling up the evidence that you're delusional.
You are who is piling up evidence of your psychological instabilities.
...for a Wentzky "definition" of the term.
Enjoy your stay in prison.
I'm not going to prison, you COWARD!
More likely, you'll be in SC's equivalent to our Rusk State Hospital for
the rest of your life. (I'd wonder if there's a bit of concern at
Furman,
after the massacre at VPI...)
Nah, Check that partial-birth abortion ban now.
...which has what to do with Furman? After what happened Monday morning
at
VPI, I'd suspect that someone at Furman might well be concerned about one
of
their alumni who is acting like the perp in Blacksburg.
How often does your mind wander into these irrational imaginations?
It seems to me that your only purpose in life is attempting to concoct
asinine ideas about me in hopes that someone somehwere will believe them.
Know what they really does though?
It causes people to wonder what you are up to and it also causes them to
think that you are blowing smoke in order to ward off people loooking into
your personal activities, as if you are running cover for some ring that
needs you to help them not be detected.
And, check all those lower-court rulings that said it was
unconstitutional.
Looks like those lower court decrees have been cast down and out.
...which won't make a change at all, as those are rare to the point of not
having any influence on abortion stats...because (your delusions aside)
women
don't just decide to abort late-term on the spur of the moment. No study
has
ever been able to document that.
All of that does nothing to nullify the law that the USSC upheld.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 08:56:32 PM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkk5w96uce.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz15afk7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
[...]
It matters nothing whether they are public or private citizens.
Control yourself, you ingracious ***** or YOU WILL BE CONTROLLLED!
By a raving whackjob in South Carolina?
Probably by whoever feels like doing it.
This ridgerunner returns fire.
So, how is it you think no one agrees with "I have the full legal right to
self-defense to ward off any person who attacks me." if you are someone?
I *am* someone, whether you believe it or not. The problem is, you don't
decide what I think.
[...]
I'm not going to prison, you COWARD!
More likely, you'll be in SC's equivalent to our Rusk State Hospital for
the rest of your life. (I'd wonder if there's a bit of concern at
Furman, after the massacre at VPI...)
Nah, Check that partial-birth abortion ban now.
...which has what to do with Furman? After what happened Monday morning at
VPI, I'd suspect that someone at Furman might well be concerned about one
of their alumni who is acting like the perp in Blacksburg.
How often does your mind wander into these irrational imaginations?
Quit posting to your mirror.
It seems to me that your only purpose in life is attempting to concoct
asinine ideas about me in hopes that someone somehwere will believe them.
Know what they really does though?
It causes people to wonder what you are up to and it also causes them to
think that you are blowing smoke in order to ward off people loooking into
your personal activities, as if you are running cover for some ring that
needs you to help them not be detected.
The court will be less than impressed with your demonstrated paranoia.
And, check all those lower-court rulings that said it was unconstitutional.
Looks like those lower court decrees have been cast down and out.
...which won't make a change at all, as those are rare to the point of not
having any influence on abortion stats...because (your delusions aside)
women don't just decide to abort late-term on the spur of the moment. No
study has ever been able to document that.
All of that does nothing to nullify the law that the USSC upheld.
It also does nothing to make you look like anything but a mentally ill raving
kook in Anderson, SC.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 09:06:14 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szky7kp5dpr.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkk5w96uce.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz15afk7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
[...]
It matters nothing whether they are public or private citizens.
Control yourself, you ingracious ***** or YOU WILL BE CONTROLLLED!
By a raving whackjob in South Carolina?
Probably by whoever feels like doing it.
This ridgerunner returns fire.
So, how is it you think no one agrees with "I have the full legal right to
self-defense to ward off any person who attacks me." if you are someone?
I *am* someone, whether you believe it or not.
I respect that you are a person; and, that you are entitled to your
Constitutional rights.
The problem is, you don't
decide what I think.
I don't try to.
[...]
I'm not going to prison, you COWARD!
More likely, you'll be in SC's equivalent to our Rusk State Hospital
for
the rest of your life. (I'd wonder if there's a bit of concern at
Furman, after the massacre at VPI...)
Nah, Check that partial-birth abortion ban now.
...which has what to do with Furman? After what happened Monday morning
at
VPI, I'd suspect that someone at Furman might well be concerned about
one
of their alumni who is acting like the perp in Blacksburg.
How often does your mind wander into these irrational imaginations?
Quit posting to your mirror.
It seems to me that your only purpose in life is attempting to concoct
asinine ideas about me in hopes that someone somehwere will believe them.
Know what they really does though?
It causes people to wonder what you are up to and it also causes them to
think that you are blowing smoke in order to ward off people loooking into
your personal activities, as if you are running cover for some ring that
needs you to help them not be detected.
The court will be less than impressed with your demonstrated paranoia.
What paranoia?
And, check all those lower-court rulings that said it was
unconstitutional.
Looks like those lower court decrees have been cast down and out.
...which won't make a change at all, as those are rare to the point of
not
having any influence on abortion stats...because (your delusions aside)
women don't just decide to abort late-term on the spur of the moment.
No
study has ever been able to document that.
All of that does nothing to nullify the law that the USSC upheld.
It also does nothing to make you look like anything but a mentally ill
raving
kook in Anderson, SC.
Again, you are showing me that you fit the description you made of me.
Why is it you think no one agrees that I have full rights to self-defense if
you think you have rights to self-defense?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 10:41:47 PM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szky7kp5dpr.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkk5w96uce.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz15afk7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
[...]
It matters nothing whether they are public or private citizens.
Control yourself, you ingracious ***** or YOU WILL BE CONTROLLLED!
By a raving whackjob in South Carolina?
Probably by whoever feels like doing it.
This ridgerunner returns fire.
So, how is it you think no one agrees with "I have the full legal right to
self-defense to ward off any person who attacks me." if you are someone?
I *am* someone, whether you believe it or not.
I respect that you are a person; and, that you are entitled to your
Constitutional rights.
....except when you're in your normal (insane) state, and you don't.
The problem is, you don't decide what I think.
I don't try to.
....which doesn't explain the few hundred times you've done that.
[...]
I'm not going to prison, you COWARD!
More likely, you'll be in SC's equivalent to our Rusk State Hospital
for the rest of your life. (I'd wonder if there's a bit of concern at
Furman, after the massacre at VPI...)
Nah, Check that partial-birth abortion ban now.
...which has what to do with Furman? After what happened Monday morning
at VPI, I'd suspect that someone at Furman might well be concerned about
one of their alumni who is acting like the perp in Blacksburg.
How often does your mind wander into these irrational imaginations?
Quit posting to your mirror.
It seems to me that your only purpose in life is attempting to concoct
asinine ideas about me in hopes that someone somehwere will believe them.
Know what they really does though?
It causes people to wonder what you are up to and it also causes them to
think that you are blowing smoke in order to ward off people loooking into
your personal activities, as if you are running cover for some ring that
needs you to help them not be detected.
The court will be less than impressed with your demonstrated paranoia.
What paranoia?
Just your usual daily rants accusing anyone who disagrees with you of being
hired by "roevwade [sic]" people to deny you your rights, among other things.
And, check all those lower-court rulings that said it was
unconstitutional. Looks like those lower court decrees have been cast
down and out.
...which won't make a change at all, as those are rare to the point of
not having any influence on abortion stats...because (your delusions
aside) women don't just decide to abort late-term on the spur of the
moment. No study has ever been able to document that.
All of that does nothing to nullify the law that the USSC upheld.
It also does nothing to make you look like anything but a mentally ill
raving kook in Anderson, SC.
Again, you are showing me that you fit the description you made of me.
Again, you're showing that you understand very little of what you bother to
read.
Why is it you think no one agrees that I have full rights to self-defense if
you think you have rights to self-defense?
Why do you think you're above the law? I hope you make the same kind of
arguments when your court case comes up. That will make Anderson (and, by
extension, South Carolina) safer for at least a few years.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 11:52:11 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkejmhqbd0.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
Why is it you think no one agrees that I have full rights to self-defense
if
you think you have rights to self-defense?
Why do you think you're above the law?
How does being afforded their rights at law put a person above the law?
I hope you make the same kind of arguments when your court case comes up.
That will make Anderson (and, by
extension, South Carolina) safer for at least a few years.
Is that another statement of anti-liberty and criminal intent on your part
with regard to me?
How long do you think it is going to take the roevwadedom self-described
"CRIMINAL" justice culture club to straighten up?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
19 Apr 2007 12:00:58 AM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkejmhqbd0.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
Why is it you think no one agrees that I have full rights to self-defense
if you think you have rights to self-defense?
Why do you think you're above the law?
How does being afforded their rights at law put a person above the law?
So, you believe you ahve the right to assault a police officer who stopped you
for DUI? That ought to go over well in court.
I hope you make the same kind of arguments when your court case comes up.
That will make Anderson (and, by extension, South Carolina) safer for at
least a few years.
Is that another statement of anti-liberty and criminal intent on your part
with regard to me?
No, it's a simple opinion of what will likely be your fate.
How long do you think it is going to take the roevwadedom self-described
"CRIMINAL" justice culture club to straighten up?
I don't worry about your psychotic fantasies, Anderson Alky.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ScottyFLL" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 08:34:59 PM |
|
|
On Apr 18, 9:12 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
You're insane. On the rare occasions that you're actually right
This has actually happened?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 08:44:27 PM |
|
|
ScottyFLL <1scott@lycos.com> writes:
On Apr 18, 9:12 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
You're insane. On the rare occasions that you're actually right
This has actually happened?
There's no actual evidence of such, but by the laws of probability, he might
have actually been right once in his 45 years...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 11:40:04 AM |
|
|
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 9:39 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder
"What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free
from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at
which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than
discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no
firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is trying to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and their
gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal *****
unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.-
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we,
This society.
you perverted abortionistic homoseuxal ***** piece of dogshit?
Enjoy your stay in prison, you convicted pervert.
Since you cannot manage to control yourself you
will be controlled by others.
Nah, idiot.
You've already spent time in prison, idiot. Was it by choice?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 07:43:07 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:462649e4$0$14081$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 9:39 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder
"What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the
irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time
since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free
from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in
which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at
which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than
discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no
firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is trying
to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and
their
gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the
nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal *****
unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will
seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.-
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want
to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we,
This society.
Are you referring to roevwadedom and the "CRIMINAL" justice system?
FYI, that isn't the entire society.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 09:48:21 PM |
|
|
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:462649e4$0$14081$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 9:39 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder
"What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the
irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time
since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free
from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in
which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at
which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than
discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no
firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is trying
to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and
their
gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the
nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal *****
unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will
seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.-
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want
to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we,
This society.
Are you referring to roevwadedom and the "CRIMINAL" justice system?
No. The society that's going to put your drunk ***** into prison
because you cannot manage to control yourself better than a
2-year-old.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 10:04:27 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4626d875$0$14150$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:462649e4$0$14081$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 9:39 pm, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder
"What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the
irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at
a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to
misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time
since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She
pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and
her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free
from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in
which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at
the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at
the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at
which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay
and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than
discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it
differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no
firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated
and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is
trying
to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and
their
gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the
nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal *****
unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will
seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.-
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want
to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm
to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we,
This society.
Are you referring to roevwadedom and the "CRIMINAL" justice system?
No.
So, now you are abandoning your allegiance?
The society that's going to put your drunk ***** into prison
because you cannot manage to control yourself better than a
2-year-old.
Society isn't charging me with anything.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 11:40:50 PM |
|
|
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4626d875$0$14150$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:462649e4$0$14081$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:46258cc4$0$14076$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"ScottyFLL" <1scott@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1176862002.229767.103320@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 9:39 pm, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
"J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176828461.298472.284310@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It's incidents such as these that make the average person wonder
"What
the hell is wrong with these homos?" Two men are pressing charges
against one woman for harrassment? Obviously they don't see the
irony
of having "fruit" tossed at them.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73608
A Pacifica woman accused of hurling produce along with insults at
a
gay couple from a van last month pleaded not guilty to
misdemeanor
battery and hate crime charges Friday.
She stands trial this summer.
Tiffany Adler, 20, appeared in court Friday for the first time
since
being arrested on two misdemeanor counts of each crime. She
pleaded
not guilty and asked the court to appoint an attorney. She and
her
lawyer return to court July 2 for jury trial and she remains free
from
custody on her own recognizance.
On March 4, Adler reportedly lobbed apples and asparagus at a gay
couple walking on the 500 block of Esplanade Drive. The van in
which
she was riding then turned around and Adler yelled "*****" at
the
men, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Pacifica police reported finding asparagus in Adler's purse at
the
time of arrest.
Adler reportedly said the couple frequented the grocery store at
which
she works. She told police she was unaware the victims were gay
and
her actions were based on a prior conflict rather than
discrimination.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe sees it
differently.
Of course he sees it differently.
He didn't even see it to begin with.
His opinion is irrelevant.
"We definitely think this is a hate crime," he said. "This one is
pretty offensive."
*****. What is offensive is some ***** ***** DA who has no
firsthand
knowledge of the incident whatsoever making ***** opinionated
and
subjective comments about people other than himself who he is
trying
to
prosecute to win points with the tax leech ***** brigades and
their
gay
cohorts and assholes who are HIV infected threats amongst the
nation's
people.
The DA has a conflict of interest in the federal *****
unconstitutional
prosecution for $$ agenda.
If convicted, Adler faces possible jail time and probation.
If convicted on these ***** hate crime statutes the people will
seek
revenge upon the ***** "CRIMINAL" tax leech prejudice clan.-
Uncontrollable people, like drunk drivers
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want
to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm
to
anyone.
We don't tolerate drunk drivers and we don't tolerate drunks who then
assault officers.
Who is we,
This society.
Are you referring to roevwadedom and the "CRIMINAL" justice system?
No.
So, now you are abandoning your allegiance?
No, loser.
The society that's going to put your drunk ***** into prison
because you cannot manage to control yourself better than a
2-year-old.
Society isn't charging me with anything.
According to the state of S. Carolina you're a liar.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 09:53:46 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:33:51 -0400 there was an Ancient "John
D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> who stoppeth one in
alt.atheism
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who cuased no actual harm to
anyone.
Actually I'm a licensed commercial driver with close to 15 years
experience driving everything from airport shuttles to Class-B
flatbeds.
Drunk drivers need to be taken off the road before they kill someone.
They do eventually, you know. Sooner or later, their luck runs out and
they or some innocent dies in a wreck caused by a person driving while
under the influence of a central nervous depressant. Which is why,
with overwelming support, laws have been enacted in every state and at
the federal level to crack down on those who endanger the public by
driving drunk.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 10:18:28 PM |
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:j8md23hvfp8vcqsgcnqcvplofpttnbbvn8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:33:51 -0400 there was an Ancient "John
D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> who stoppeth one in
alt.atheism
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who caused no actual harm to
anyone.
Actually I'm a licensed commercial driver with close to 15 years
experience driving everything from airport shuttles to Class-B
flatbeds.
Drunk drivers need to be taken off the road before they kill someone.
They do eventually, you know.
I know plenty of people who drank almost their entire lives from the age
they could consume alcohol and none of them killed anyone.
Sooner or later, their luck runs out and they or some innocent dies in a
wreck caused by a person driving while
under the influence of a central nervous depressant.
I can not accept that statement as truthful.
There are millions of counterexamples that tell me you are lying.
Which is why, with overwelming support, laws have been enacted in every
state and at
the federal level to crack down on those who endanger the public by
driving drunk.
***** laws that are punishing persons excessively, in violation of the
Constitution.
The data they have shows you that persons are not as much of a risk in this
phenomenon of DUI/DWI related traffic injuries and fatalities as they grow
older.
The majority of the dui/dwi problems are in younger drivers who are
violating other traffic codes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 10:46:53 PM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:j8md23hvfp8vcqsgcnqcvplofpttnbbvn8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:33:51 -0400 there was an Ancient "John
D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> who stoppeth one in
alt.atheism
I take it you have no license to drive and that is what makes you want to
see other persons denied liberty in the USA who caused no actual harm to
anyone.
Actually I'm a licensed commercial driver with close to 15 years
experience driving everything from airport shuttles to Class-B
flatbeds.
Drunk drivers need to be taken off the road before they kill someone.
They do eventually, you know.
I know plenty of people who drank almost their entire lives from the age
they could consume alcohol and none of them killed anyone.
Riiiiight...and the sun in your world rises in the west.
Sooner or later, their luck runs out and they or some innocent dies in a
wreck caused by a person driving while
under the influence of a central nervous depressant.
I can not accept that statement as truthful.
It's one hell of a lot closer to reality than you've been in years.
There are millions of counterexamples that tell me you are lying.
....or, more likely, one example that you're using to assume that that's true
for everyone else.
Which is why, with overwelming support, laws have been enacted in every
state and at the federal level to crack down on those who endanger the
public by driving drunk.
***** laws that are punishing persons excessively, in violation of the
Constitution.
Really? How many times have you been busted for DUI?
The data they have shows you that persons are not as much of a risk in this
phenomenon of DUI/DWI related traffic injuries and fatalities as they grow
older. The majority of the dui/dwi problems are in younger drivers who are
violating other traffic codes.
The NTSB seems to disagree with your fantasy...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Not guilty plea in alleged hateful fruit tossing |
18 Apr 2007 11:49:31 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator <patrick@eris.io.com> writes:
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:j8md23hvfp8vcqsgcnqcvplofpttnbbvn8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:33:51 -0400 there was an Ancient "John
D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> who stoppeth one in
alt.atheism
Drunk drivers need to be taken off the road before they kill someone.
They do eventually, you know.
I know plenty of people who drank almost their entire lives from the age
they could consume alcohol and none of them killed anyone.
Riiiiight...and the sun in your world rises in the west.
It's sort of true in Scandanavian countries - there are very stringent
laws regarding DUI, so nobody does it. If they are going out to
drink, they would normally either have a designated driver or use
public transportation. Somehow I don't think that is what Wentzky
had in mind. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator"< | | | | | | | | | |
