| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Papa Jack" |
| Date: |
14 Nov 2003 10:12:09 AM |
| Object: |
NOT Health Care |
On Nov. 13, 2003, the American Life League (ALL) released a
statement titled: "Abortion is Not Health Care." Go to:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usnw/20031113/pl_usnw/all_to_public_health_care_workers____abortion_is_not_health_care__offers_assistance_to_health_care_workers_in_abortion_industry
_________________________________________________________________
SAN FRANCISCO -- "Abortion Is Not Health Care" is the theme
of American Life League's booth at the American Public Health
Association Expo. More than 10,000 public heath care workers
are expected to attend this event, which is being held at the
Moscone Center in San Francisco from Sunday, Nov. 16 through
Wednesday, Nov. 19.
"Our intent is to bring out the truth about abortion and the harm
it does, not only to the babies it kills and the mothers and
fathers
it injures, but also to the health care workers who participate,"
said Jim Sedlak, vice president of American Life League.
"There is growing evidence," said Sedlak, "that more and more
of those who participate in providing abortions are suffering
psychological harm."
On Sunday, Nov. 16 and Monday, Nov. 17, Dr. Haywood
Robinson will be available at the booth (number 1146) to speak
to those in the health care industry who provide abortions. Dr.
Robinson is a former abortionist from Texas.
"I want to reach out to all involved in the abortion industry,"
said Dr. Robinson. "Doctors, nurses, medical assistants and
even receptionists are all affected. I'm hopeful that many
health care professionals will stop by and discuss abortion
participation with me."
"In addition," said Sedlak, "our booth will feature a 4-D
ultrasound video of a baby in the womb. We invite everyone
attending the expo to see the 'fetus' in its natural environment."
_________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack smiled:
I'm curious about what a "4-D ultrasound video" is.
I'm glad to see the theme, "Abortion is not Health Care."
For too long, the Pro-Aborts crowd has gotten away
with this obvious lie. The great majority of abortions
have absolutely nothing to do with health -- the woman
is healthy and the growing fetus is healthy. The woman
simply doesn't want to be pregnant and have a child,
so she pays an abortionist to kill it. THAT is what
the "Culture of Death" folks call "medical care."
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
taNOThealthCare
.
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
14 Nov 2003 02:26:54 PM |
|
|
"Papa Jack" <papajack@stic.net> wrote in message
news:6f9e1b49.0311140812.4e58f5ed@posting.google.com...
On Nov. 13, 2003, the American Life League (ALL) released a
statement titled: "Abortion is Not Health Care." Go to:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usnw/20031113/pl_usnw/all_to_public_health_care_workers____abortion_is_not_health_care__offers_assistance_to_health_care_workers_in_abortion_industry
_________________________________________________________________
SAN FRANCISCO -- "Abortion Is Not Health Care" is the theme
of American Life League's booth at the American Public Health
Association Expo. More than 10,000 public heath care workers
are expected to attend this event, which is being held at the
Moscone Center in San Francisco from Sunday, Nov. 16 through
Wednesday, Nov. 19.
"Our intent is to bring out the truth about abortion and the harm
it does, not only to the babies it kills and the mothers and
fathers
it injures, but also to the health care workers who participate,"
said Jim Sedlak, vice president of American Life League.
"There is growing evidence," said Sedlak, "that more and more
of those who participate in providing abortions are suffering
psychological harm."
On Sunday, Nov. 16 and Monday, Nov. 17, Dr. Haywood
Robinson will be available at the booth (number 1146) to speak
to those in the health care industry who provide abortions. Dr.
Robinson is a former abortionist from Texas.
"I want to reach out to all involved in the abortion industry,"
said Dr. Robinson. "Doctors, nurses, medical assistants and
even receptionists are all affected. I'm hopeful that many
health care professionals will stop by and discuss abortion
participation with me."
"In addition," said Sedlak, "our booth will feature a 4-D
ultrasound video of a baby in the womb. We invite everyone
attending the expo to see the 'fetus' in its natural environment."
_________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack smiled:
I'm curious about what a "4-D ultrasound video" is.
I'm glad to see the theme, "Abortion is not Health Care."
For too long, the Pro-Aborts crowd has gotten away
with this obvious lie. The great majority of abortions
have absolutely nothing to do with health -- the woman
is healthy and the growing fetus is healthy. The woman
simply doesn't want to be pregnant and have a child,
so she pays an abortionist to kill it. THAT is what
the "Culture of Death" folks call "medical care."
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
Is it now your position that pregnancy has absolutely no effect on the
health of the pregnant woman?
taNOThealthCare
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
15 Nov 2003 02:40:54 AM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<bp3dre$1k2for$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
Is it now your position that pregnancy has absolutely no effect on the
health of the pregnant woman?
Obviously if it was such a great health risk, six billion plus women
would not have done it successfully.
Hell, you yourself did it twice. You should know better than to
peddle exaggerated lies about the "dangers" of pregnancy.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
15 Nov 2003 10:49:21 AM |
|
|
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311150040.21631957@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bp3dre$1k2for$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
Is it now your position that pregnancy has absolutely no effect on the
health of the pregnant woman?
Obviously if it was such a great health risk, six billion plus women
would not have done it successfully.
And millions more wouldn't have had health problems, been seriously damaged
and/or died?
Hell, you yourself did it twice. You should know better than to
peddle exaggerated lies about the "dangers" of pregnancy.
I had one relatively uncomplicated pregnancy which still developed toxemia
in the end, and one pregnancy that was nothing but problems from start to
finish. If you're going to ask me how healthy pregnancy is, you're asking
the wrong person.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
18 Nov 2003 12:36:34 AM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<bp5lfg$1kg191$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311150040.21631957@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bp3dre$1k2for$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
Is it now your position that pregnancy has absolutely no effect on the
health of the pregnant woman?
Obviously if it was such a great health risk, six billion plus women
would not have done it successfully.
And millions more wouldn't have had health problems, been seriously damaged
and/or died?
Numbers show no.
Hell, you yourself did it twice. You should know better than to
peddle exaggerated lies about the "dangers" of pregnancy.
I had one relatively uncomplicated pregnancy which still developed toxemia
in the end, and one pregnancy that was nothing but problems from start to
finish.
And yet here you are.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
If you're going to ask me how healthy pregnancy is, you're asking
the wrong person.
Actually, your statements just prove me right.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
18 Nov 2003 12:55:29 AM |
|
|
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311172236.4fbd6606@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bp5lfg$1kg191$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311150040.21631957@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bp3dre$1k2for$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
Is it now your position that pregnancy has absolutely no effect on
the
health of the pregnant woman?
Obviously if it was such a great health risk, six billion plus women
would not have done it successfully.
And millions more wouldn't have had health problems, been seriously
damaged
and/or died?
Numbers show no.
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
Hell, you yourself did it twice. You should know better than to
peddle exaggerated lies about the "dangers" of pregnancy.
I had one relatively uncomplicated pregnancy which still developed
toxemia
in the end, and one pregnancy that was nothing but problems from start
to
finish.
And yet here you are.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
No. I've had that since I was 6.
If you're going to ask me how healthy pregnancy is, you're asking
the wrong person.
Actually, your statements just prove me right.
Your mind is made up. Anything will prove you right, correct or not.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
18 Nov 2003 11:42:36 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<bpcfq5$1lp9rb$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311172236.4fbd6606@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bp5lfg$1kg191$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311150040.21631957@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bp3dre$1k2for$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
Is it now your position that pregnancy has absolutely no effect on
the
health of the pregnant woman?
Obviously if it was such a great health risk, six billion plus women
would not have done it successfully.
And millions more wouldn't have had health problems, been seriously
damaged
and/or died?
Numbers show no.
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Hell, you yourself did it twice. You should know better than to
peddle exaggerated lies about the "dangers" of pregnancy.
I had one relatively uncomplicated pregnancy which still developed
toxemia
in the end, and one pregnancy that was nothing but problems from start
to
finish.
And yet here you are.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
No. I've had that since I was 6.
So what exact problems do you have that were proven to have been
caused by pregnancy?
If you're going to ask me how healthy pregnancy is, you're asking
the wrong person.
Actually, your statements just prove me right.
Your mind is made up. Anything will prove you right, correct or not.
QED
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
19 Nov 2003 07:27:50 AM |
|
|
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311182142.7df68da9@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bpcfq5$1lp9rb$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311172236.4fbd6606@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bp5lfg$1kg191$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311150040.21631957@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:<bp3dre$1k2for$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
Is it now your position that pregnancy has absolutely no effect
on
the
health of the pregnant woman?
Obviously if it was such a great health risk, six billion plus
women
would not have done it successfully.
And millions more wouldn't have had health problems, been seriously
damaged
and/or died?
Numbers show no.
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Perhaps you should have read them then. Millions of women do indeed come out
of it maimed or dead.
Hell, you yourself did it twice. You should know better than to
peddle exaggerated lies about the "dangers" of pregnancy.
I had one relatively uncomplicated pregnancy which still developed
toxemia
in the end, and one pregnancy that was nothing but problems from
start
to
finish.
And yet here you are.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
No. I've had that since I was 6.
So what exact problems do you have that were proven to have been
caused by pregnancy?
Have you ever been pregnant?
If you're going to ask me how healthy pregnancy is, you're asking
the wrong person.
Actually, your statements just prove me right.
Your mind is made up. Anything will prove you right, correct or not.
QED
Not so for me, the facts back up my assertion that pregnancy can be
dangerous. I'd like to see your proof that it never is.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
20 Nov 2003 01:30:07 AM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<bpfr5o$1aqit4$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311182142.7df68da9@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bpcfq5$1lp9rb$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311172236.4fbd6606@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bp5lfg$1kg191$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311150040.21631957@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:<bp3dre$1k2for$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
Is it now your position that pregnancy has absolutely no effect
on
the
health of the pregnant woman?
Obviously if it was such a great health risk, six billion plus
women
would not have done it successfully.
And millions more wouldn't have had health problems, been seriously
damaged
and/or died?
Numbers show no.
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Perhaps you should have read them then.
I did.
Millions of women do indeed come out
of it maimed or dead.
No, your numbers said 500K. Not even close to ONE million, let alone millionS.
Hell, you yourself did it twice. You should know better than to
peddle exaggerated lies about the "dangers" of pregnancy.
I had one relatively uncomplicated pregnancy which still developed
toxemia
in the end, and one pregnancy that was nothing but problems from
start
to
finish.
And yet here you are.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
No. I've had that since I was 6.
So what exact problems do you have that were proven to have been
caused by pregnancy?
Have you ever been pregnant?
So now you answer a question with a question?
I'll answer yours when you answer mine.
If you're going to ask me how healthy pregnancy is, you're asking
the wrong person.
Actually, your statements just prove me right.
Your mind is made up. Anything will prove you right, correct or not.
QED
Not so for me, the facts back up my assertion that pregnancy can be
dangerous.
No, they don't.
I'd like to see your proof that it never is.
Strawman.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
20 Nov 2003 02:25:23 AM |
|
|
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311192330.70cf88b3@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bpfr5o$1aqit4$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311182142.7df68da9@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bpcfq5$1lp9rb$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311172236.4fbd6606@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:<bp5lfg$1kg191$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311150040.21631957@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:<bp3dre$1k2for$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
I wonder if the deeds of a Mafia hit man would be
covered under Midicare? Such hits are just as much
"health care" as unnecessary abortions.
Is it now your position that pregnancy has absolutely no
effect
on
the
health of the pregnant woman?
Obviously if it was such a great health risk, six billion plus
women
would not have done it successfully.
And millions more wouldn't have had health problems, been
seriously
damaged
and/or died?
Numbers show no.
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Perhaps you should have read them then.
I did.
Millions of women do indeed come out
of it maimed or dead.
No, your numbers said 500K. Not even close to ONE million, let alone
millionS.
500k *per year*, and that is strictly the death rate. Perhaps you should
have read them then.
Hell, you yourself did it twice. You should know better than
to
peddle exaggerated lies about the "dangers" of pregnancy.
I had one relatively uncomplicated pregnancy which still
developed
toxemia
in the end, and one pregnancy that was nothing but problems from
start
to
finish.
And yet here you are.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
No. I've had that since I was 6.
So what exact problems do you have that were proven to have been
caused by pregnancy?
Have you ever been pregnant?
So now you answer a question with a question?
I'll answer yours when you answer mine.
I was toxemic at the end of both pregnancies, I had gestational diabetes
with the second, plus anemia with the second as well.
If you're going to ask me how healthy pregnancy is, you're asking
the wrong person.
Actually, your statements just prove me right.
Your mind is made up. Anything will prove you right, correct or not.
QED
Not so for me, the facts back up my assertion that pregnancy can be
dangerous.
No, they don't.
Please explain then how they support pregnancy being safe and without health
problems.
I'd like to see your proof that it never is.
Strawman.
Then what are you arguing for, if you know it's dangerous?
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
21 Nov 2003 12:52:14 AM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Perhaps you should have read them then.
I did.
Millions of women do indeed come out
of it maimed or dead.
No, your numbers said 500K. Not even close to ONE million, let alone
millionS.
500k *per year*,
Yes, I am aware of the rate. I am also aware that the vast majority
of that comes from preindustrialized nations.
and that is strictly the death rate.
That's all that matters.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
No. I've had that since I was 6.
So what exact problems do you have that were proven to have been
caused by pregnancy?
Have you ever been pregnant?
So now you answer a question with a question?
I'll answer yours when you answer mine.
I was toxemic at the end of both pregnancies,
The key word was HAVE. Do you currently HAVE any problems that were
caused by having been pregnant?
Almost 10% of pregnancies are affected by hypertension. It's cured by
birth, as you well know. It's also treatable and preventable, to a
certain extent.
I had gestational diabetes
with the second, plus anemia with the second as well.
So? None of these are life-threatening when treated properly. I
suspect that you didn't get proper prenatal care.
Your mind is made up. Anything will prove you right, correct or not.
QED
Not so for me, the facts back up my assertion that pregnancy can be
dangerous.
No, they don't.
Please explain then how they support pregnancy being safe and without health
problems.
I never said pregnancy was without health problems. Nothing is
without health problems.
Statistics show it's safe enough.
I'd like to see your proof that it never is.
Strawman.
Then what are you arguing for, if you know it's dangerous?
Driving on the highway is ten times more dangerous.
--S
During that time period (1991-1999), the surveillance system
identified 4,200 pregnancy-related deaths, for a U.S.
pregnancy-related mortality ratio of 11.8 pregnancy-related deaths per
100,000 live births. Source: MMWR, February 21, 2003/Vol. 52/No.
SS–2;1–8 www.cdc.gov
About 41,345 people lost their lives in traffic crashes during 1999,
in 1998 there were 41,471 fatalities. www.car-accidents.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
21 Nov 2003 12:56:16 AM |
|
|
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311202252.60ac4de@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Perhaps you should have read them then.
I did.
Millions of women do indeed come out
of it maimed or dead.
No, your numbers said 500K. Not even close to ONE million, let alone
millionS.
500k *per year*,
Yes, I am aware of the rate. I am also aware that the vast majority
of that comes from preindustrialized nations.
They don't matter either? Curiosity- does anything *but* a fetus matter to
you?
and that is strictly the death rate.
That's all that matters.
That says everything about you that anyone needs to know.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
No. I've had that since I was 6.
So what exact problems do you have that were proven to have been
caused by pregnancy?
Have you ever been pregnant?
So now you answer a question with a question?
I'll answer yours when you answer mine.
I was toxemic at the end of both pregnancies,
The key word was HAVE. Do you currently HAVE any problems that were
caused by having been pregnant?
Reduced bladder control (not serious), broken arches on both feet.
Almost 10% of pregnancies are affected by hypertension. It's cured by
birth, as you well know. It's also treatable and preventable, to a
certain extent.
I had gestational diabetes
with the second, plus anemia with the second as well.
So? None of these are life-threatening when treated properly. I
suspect that you didn't get proper prenatal care.
I got proper prenatal care. That's why I'm here discussing it with a know-
nothing with 0 kids.
Your mind is made up. Anything will prove you right, correct or
not.
QED
Not so for me, the facts back up my assertion that pregnancy can be
dangerous.
No, they don't.
Please explain then how they support pregnancy being safe and without
health
problems.
I never said pregnancy was without health problems. Nothing is
without health problems.
Statistics show it's safe enough.
To whom? I doubt the at- risk women would agree.
I'd like to see your proof that it never is.
Strawman.
Then what are you arguing for, if you know it's dangerous?
Driving on the highway is ten times more dangerous.
Sure- in nations where *options* are available.
--S
During that time period (1991-1999), the surveillance system
identified 4,200 pregnancy-related deaths, for a U.S.
pregnancy-related mortality ratio of 11.8 pregnancy-related deaths per
100,000 live births. Source: MMWR, February 21, 2003/Vol. 52/No.
SS-2;1-8 www.cdc.gov
About 41,345 people lost their lives in traffic crashes during 1999,
in 1998 there were 41,471 fatalities. www.car-accidents.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
21 Nov 2003 10:52:49 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<bpkd02$1qaqcv$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311202252.60ac4de@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Perhaps you should have read them then.
I did.
Millions of women do indeed come out
of it maimed or dead.
No, your numbers said 500K. Not even close to ONE million, let alone
millionS.
500k *per year*,
Yes, I am aware of the rate. I am also aware that the vast majority
of that comes from preindustrialized nations.
They don't matter either?
What do you mean by "matter?" Am I supposed to shed tears for them or
something? Send a care package to Unicef? What?
Curiosity- does anything *but* a fetus matter to
you?
Fetuses don't matter to me either, really. What matters to me is that
they be treated the same as other people under the law. Whether they
die naturally or not, or whether women, men, children, or animals die
of natural causes concerns me about as much as the hangnail I got at
work today.
and that is strictly the death rate.
That's all that matters.
That says everything about you that anyone needs to know.
That is: Nothing.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
No. I've had that since I was 6.
So what exact problems do you have that were proven to have been
caused by pregnancy?
Have you ever been pregnant?
So now you answer a question with a question?
I'll answer yours when you answer mine.
I was toxemic at the end of both pregnancies,
The key word was HAVE. Do you currently HAVE any problems that were
caused by having been pregnant?
Reduced bladder control (not serious), broken arches on both feet.
So were you hoping for a medal? Do you think having poor arches and a
problem bladder is reason enough to commit homicide?
I don't.
Almost 10% of pregnancies are affected by hypertension. It's cured by
birth, as you well know. It's also treatable and preventable, to a
certain extent.
I had gestational diabetes
with the second, plus anemia with the second as well.
So? None of these are life-threatening when treated properly. I
suspect that you didn't get proper prenatal care.
I got proper prenatal care.
I doubt it.
That's why I'm here discussing it with a know-
nothing with 0 kids.
Yes, it's apparent that you, who has four children (two fatherless,
two dead), know everything.
Maybe the jealousy is on your part--that I wasn't so stupid as to make
the same mistakes you did.
Your mind is made up. Anything will prove you right, correct or
not.
QED
Not so for me, the facts back up my assertion that pregnancy can be
dangerous.
No, they don't.
Please explain then how they support pregnancy being safe and without
health
problems.
I never said pregnancy was without health problems. Nothing is
without health problems.
Statistics show it's safe enough.
To whom?
Everyone.
I doubt the at- risk women would agree.
I doubt that people who have been killed on the highway would agree
that driving in a car is safe. Yet people still do it because
statistically the benefits outweigh the risks.
Perhaps you should have subjected the idea of pregnancy to the
cost-benefit analysis you now want to subject it to BEFORE you got
pregnant. Ostensibly that is why you are complaining. However, be
prepared to accept the fact that the benefits do in fact outweigh the
costs, which means you argument for abortion falls flat on its face.
I'd like to see your proof that it never is.
Strawman.
Then what are you arguing for, if you know it's dangerous?
Driving on the highway is ten times more dangerous.
Sure- in nations where *options* are available.
Why is any of this a surprise to you? Of course where cars aren't a
cultural habit fewer people die. Is that what you are arguing for, a
ban on cars the same as you argue for a ban on fetuses?
--S
During that time period (1991-1999), the surveillance system
identified 4,200 pregnancy-related deaths, for a U.S.
pregnancy-related mortality ratio of 11.8 pregnancy-related deaths per
100,000 live births. Source: MMWR, February 21, 2003/Vol. 52/No.
SS-2;1-8 www.cdc.gov
About 41,345 people lost their lives in traffic crashes during 1999,
in 1998 there were 41,471 fatalities. www.car-accidents.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
22 Nov 2003 12:09:50 AM |
|
|
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311212052.6a520bee@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bpkd02$1qaqcv$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311202252.60ac4de@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Perhaps you should have read them then.
I did.
Millions of women do indeed come out
of it maimed or dead.
No, your numbers said 500K. Not even close to ONE million, let
alone
millionS.
500k *per year*,
Yes, I am aware of the rate. I am also aware that the vast majority
of that comes from preindustrialized nations.
They don't matter either?
What do you mean by "matter?" Am I supposed to shed tears for them or
something? Send a care package to Unicef? What?
Curiosity- does anything *but* a fetus matter to
you?
Fetuses don't matter to me either, really.
Possibly the first honest words to come from you.
What matters to me is that
they be treated the same as other people under the law.
They are. They are not allowed to forcibly inhabit the body of an unwilling
woman. Which goes for the rest of us as well.
Whether they
die naturally or not, or whether women, men, children, or animals die
of natural causes concerns me about as much as the hangnail I got at
work today.
and that is strictly the death rate.
That's all that matters.
That says everything about you that anyone needs to know.
That is: Nothing.
Let me guess: Your pregnancy caused your depression?
No. I've had that since I was 6.
So what exact problems do you have that were proven to have
been
caused by pregnancy?
Have you ever been pregnant?
So now you answer a question with a question?
I'll answer yours when you answer mine.
I was toxemic at the end of both pregnancies,
The key word was HAVE. Do you currently HAVE any problems that were
caused by having been pregnant?
Reduced bladder control (not serious), broken arches on both feet.
So were you hoping for a medal? Do you think having poor arches and a
problem bladder is reason enough to commit homicide?
If you are referring to abortion- yes it does.
I don't.
Good thing I don't live by your opinion, then.
Almost 10% of pregnancies are affected by hypertension. It's cured by
birth, as you well know. It's also treatable and preventable, to a
certain extent.
I had gestational diabetes
with the second, plus anemia with the second as well.
So? None of these are life-threatening when treated properly. I
suspect that you didn't get proper prenatal care.
I got proper prenatal care.
I doubt it.
I'm sure you do.
That's why I'm here discussing it with a know-
nothing with 0 kids.
Yes, it's apparent that you, who has four children (two fatherless,
two dead), know everything.
Certainly more than you do. Is *that* where all this jealousy stems from?
Maybe the jealousy is on your part--that I wasn't so stupid as to make
the same mistakes you did.
If I wanted your life, you'd probably be right. But really, I've enjoyed
life, even with (or because of?) my mistakes. It's been eventful and I've
rarely been bored. I sincerely doubt your life would hold anything that
would tempt me.
Your mind is made up. Anything will prove you right, correct
or
not.
QED
Not so for me, the facts back up my assertion that pregnancy can
be
dangerous.
No, they don't.
Please explain then how they support pregnancy being safe and
without
health
problems.
I never said pregnancy was without health problems. Nothing is
without health problems.
Statistics show it's safe enough.
To whom?
Everyone.
Bethe? Reptile?
I doubt the at- risk women would agree.
I doubt that people who have been killed on the highway would agree
that driving in a car is safe. Yet people still do it because
statistically the benefits outweigh the risks.
Pregnancy doesn't, at least to the women who choose not to do it.
Perhaps you should have subjected the idea of pregnancy to the
cost-benefit analysis you now want to subject it to BEFORE you got
pregnant. Ostensibly that is why you are complaining.
Complaining? You asked what damage pregnancy had done me, I answered.
Granted I could have done without the second kid, but it wasn't like it was
something I did deliberately. I was on birth control at the time.
However, be
prepared to accept the fact that the benefits do in fact outweigh the
costs, which means you argument for abortion falls flat on its face.
The benefits outweigh the costs to*some* women. Others prefer not to become
a statistic.
I'd like to see your proof that it never is.
Strawman.
Then what are you arguing for, if you know it's dangerous?
Driving on the highway is ten times more dangerous.
Sure- in nations where *options* are available.
Why is any of this a surprise to you? Of course where cars aren't a
cultural habit fewer people die. Is that what you are arguing for, a
ban on cars the same as you argue for a ban on fetuses?
<chuckle>
Now where did I say that all women should abort? If she wants one that's her
business, not mine, and if she doesn't that's her business, not yours.
--S
During that time period (1991-1999), the surveillance system
identified 4,200 pregnancy-related deaths, for a U.S.
pregnancy-related mortality ratio of 11.8 pregnancy-related deaths per
100,000 live births. Source: MMWR, February 21, 2003/Vol. 52/No.
SS-2;1-8 www.cdc.gov
About 41,345 people lost their lives in traffic crashes during 1999,
in 1998 there were 41,471 fatalities. www.car-accidents.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
23 Nov 2003 01:50:01 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<bpmukk$1qjkv1$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311212052.6a520bee@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bpkd02$1qaqcv$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311202252.60ac4de@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Perhaps you should have read them then.
I did.
Millions of women do indeed come out
of it maimed or dead.
No, your numbers said 500K. Not even close to ONE million, let
alone
millionS.
500k *per year*,
Yes, I am aware of the rate. I am also aware that the vast majority
of that comes from preindustrialized nations.
They don't matter either?
What do you mean by "matter?" Am I supposed to shed tears for them or
something? Send a care package to Unicef? What?
Curiosity- does anything *but* a fetus matter to
you?
Fetuses don't matter to me either, really.
Possibly the first honest words to come from you.
That's an idiotic thing to say considering the length of my PH and the
fact that I have posted many times on politics and history...most of
which contain commonly-known facts that you would have to deny.
What matters to me is that
they be treated the same as other people under the law.
They are.
Really. When was the last time a fetus was treated like a human being?
They are not allowed to forcibly inhabit the body of an unwilling
woman.
No one said they were, but your statement is idiotic and riddled with
illogic.
1.] For the fetus to have committed any force, it would have to be
shown that it was there of its own volition, and that its presence
there was indeed a show of actual force, committed with forethought
and preplanning.
2.] Comparing the fetus to people who knowingly commit force against
others decimates your argument that they are not indeed fully human.
3.] If having determined that its presence in the womb is a forceful
act, and that it preplanned the whole thing with malice aforethought,
it would have to be given a trial by a jury of its peers to determine
its crimes and what the penalty should be.
That IS how we do it here in the USA.
If you kill someone without being able to show how they were in fact
committing a deadly force against you, you can serve prison time for
homicide.
In order to justify your position, you have to show how pregnancy is a
show of violent, life threatening force for every abortion committed.
Which goes for the rest of us as well.
No, the "rest of us" at least get to have a fair trial.
I was toxemic at the end of both pregnancies,
The key word was HAVE. Do you currently HAVE any problems that were
caused by having been pregnant?
Reduced bladder control (not serious), broken arches on both feet.
So were you hoping for a medal? Do you think having poor arches and a
problem bladder is reason enough to commit homicide?
If you are referring to abortion- yes it does.
That says all about you that anyone needs to know. ;)
I don't.
Good thing I don't live by your opinion, then.
You might one day since your position is extremist. Not even a court
of law would agree with you arguing the way you do.
So? None of these are life-threatening when treated properly. I
suspect that you didn't get proper prenatal care.
I got proper prenatal care.
I doubt it.
I'm sure you do.
That's why I'm here discussing it with a know-
nothing with 0 kids.
Yes, it's apparent that you, who has four children (two fatherless,
two dead), know everything.
Certainly more than you do.
Then why can't you make a statement that can stand on its own as even
remotely true?
Is *that* where all this jealousy stems from?
Rest assured that you are fooling yourself if you think you've gotten
anything over on me, or that your debating even holds a candle to my
own.
Maybe the jealousy is on your part--that I wasn't so stupid as to make
the same mistakes you did.
If I wanted your life, you'd probably be right.
You don't have the capability to live life the way I do. Therefore
you aren't even programmed to want it.
But really, I've enjoyed
life, even with (or because of?) my mistakes.
It certainly shows considering all the bitching you've done about it.
It's been eventful and I've
rarely been bored.
Well, that's certainly a gold standard to live up to.
I sincerely doubt your life would hold anything that
would tempt me.
Of course not--I don't live a life of temptations as you apparently
do.
I don't live my life appealing to my base appetites like you do.
I, however, will be living long after your appetites have consumed
you.
Statistics show it's safe enough.
To whom?
Everyone.
Bethe? Reptile?
Them too, since they are apparently alive and well enough to shoot off
their keyboards here on Usenet.
I doubt the at- risk women would agree.
I doubt that people who have been killed on the highway would agree
that driving in a car is safe. Yet people still do it because
statistically the benefits outweigh the risks.
Pregnancy doesn't,
Yes it does.
Perhaps you should have subjected the idea of pregnancy to the
cost-benefit analysis you now want to subject it to BEFORE you got
pregnant. Ostensibly that is why you are complaining.
Complaining?
Sounds that way to me.
You asked what damage pregnancy had done me, I answered.
That is because you came from a position that pregnancy is some
disease that must be prevented--a damaging, debilitating, dangerous
health condition.
It has been shown that you are being extremist.
Granted I could have done without the second kid, but it wasn't like it was
something I did deliberately.
Yes, engaging in the act which creates children wasn't deliberate.
I was on birth control at the time.
Everyone knows birth control is not as reliable as abstinence. if you
didn't want children, you shouldn't have engaged in acts which create
them.
However, be
prepared to accept the fact that the benefits do in fact outweigh the
costs, which means you argument for abortion falls flat on its face.
The benefits outweigh the costs to*some* women.
*yawn*
Others prefer not to become
a statistic.
And in doing so become one anyway.
(They do keep numbers on abortions, you know.)
I'd like to see your proof that it never is.
Strawman.
Then what are you arguing for, if you know it's dangerous?
Driving on the highway is ten times more dangerous.
Sure- in nations where *options* are available.
Why is any of this a surprise to you? Of course where cars aren't a
cultural habit fewer people die. Is that what you are arguing for, a
ban on cars the same as you argue for a ban on fetuses?
<chuckle>
Now where did I say that all women should abort?
You don't even understand the implications of your own positions, do
you? That's typically leftist: shallow and ignorant.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "--tomcat--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
23 Nov 2003 04:13:18 PM |
|
|
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311231150.61ff9176@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bpmukk$1qjkv1$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311212052.6a520bee@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bpkd02$1qaqcv$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311202252.60ac4de@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
O- kay.
You get your numbers the same place Dotty does?
No, I got them from you. Ironic, isn't it.
Perhaps you should have read them then.
I did.
Millions of women do indeed come out
of it maimed or dead.
No, your numbers said 500K. Not even close to ONE million,
let
alone
millionS.
500k *per year*,
Yes, I am aware of the rate. I am also aware that the vast
majority
of that comes from preindustrialized nations.
They don't matter either?
What do you mean by "matter?" Am I supposed to shed tears for them or
something? Send a care package to Unicef? What?
Curiosity- does anything *but* a fetus matter to
you?
Fetuses don't matter to me either, really.
Possibly the first honest words to come from you.
That's an idiotic thing to say considering the length of my PH and the
fact that I have posted many times on politics and history...most of
which contain commonly-known facts that you would have to deny.
First, how do I know that you even have a PH.
Second, even if you do, as far as I can tell you truly did not earn it.
Consider all the ranting and raving that we have seen posted instead of just
facts( key word facts, not lunatic ravings and some facts)
What matters to me is that
they be treated the same as other people under the law.
They are.
Really. When was the last time a fetus was treated like a human being?
They are not allowed to forcibly inhabit the body of an unwilling
woman.
No one said they were, but your statement is idiotic and riddled with
illogic.
1.] For the fetus to have committed any force, it would have to be
shown that it was there of its own volition, and that its presence
there was indeed a show of actual force, committed with forethought
and preplanning.
2.] Comparing the fetus to people who knowingly commit force against
others decimates your argument that they are not indeed fully human.
By your definition, then you agree that the fetus is not fully human yet.
Thank you.
3.] If having determined that its presence in the womb is a forceful
act, and that it preplanned the whole thing with malice aforethought,
it would have to be given a trial by a jury of its peers to determine
its crimes and what the penalty should be.
That IS how we do it here in the USA.
If you kill someone without being able to show how they were in fact
committing a deadly force against you, you can serve prison time for
homicide.
Since by your definition they are not fully human, then there is no
homicide.
In order to justify your position, you have to show how pregnancy is a
show of violent, life threatening force for every abortion committed.
In order to justify Your position, you have to show how a crime is being
commited by removing a not fully human/fetus from a womb.
Which goes for the rest of us as well.
No, the "rest of us" at least get to have a fair trial.
I was toxemic at the end of both pregnancies,
The key word was HAVE. Do you currently HAVE any problems that
were
caused by having been pregnant?
Reduced bladder control (not serious), broken arches on both feet.
So were you hoping for a medal? Do you think having poor arches and a
problem bladder is reason enough to commit homicide?
If you are referring to abortion- yes it does.
That says all about you that anyone needs to know. ;)
That you want to know that is.
I don't.
Good thing I don't live by your opinion, then.
You might one day since your position is extremist. Not even a court
of law would agree with you arguing the way you do.
If letting women having a choice of what they can or cannot do with their
own body is an extremist, then by this definition I am. And probably a few
others as well.
So? None of these are life-threatening when treated properly. I
suspect that you didn't get proper prenatal care.
I got proper prenatal care.
I doubt it.
I'm sure you do.
That's why I'm here discussing it with a know-
nothing with 0 kids.
Yes, it's apparent that you, who has four children (two fatherless,
two dead), know everything.
Certainly more than you do.
Then why can't you make a statement that can stand on its own as even
remotely true?
Why can't you?
Is *that* where all this jealousy stems from?
Rest assured that you are fooling yourself if you think you've gotten
anything over on me, or that your debating even holds a candle to my
own.
I think hers is a blow torch to your matchstick.
Maybe the jealousy is on your part--that I wasn't so stupid as to make
the same mistakes you did.
If I wanted your life, you'd probably be right.
You don't have the capability to live life the way I do. Therefore
you aren't even programmed to want it.
Who would want it when it sounds pretty sad.
Programmed? If we are just robots being programmed, then your arguments are
pointless.
But really, I've enjoyed
Being miserable?
life, even with (or because of?) my mistakes.
It certainly shows considering all the bitching you've done about it.
Don't you mean Your bitching?
It's been eventful and I've
rarely been bored.
Well, that's certainly a gold standard to live up to.
Then change you attitude at least, you will have your own opinion either
way, but you can stop being rude about it and let others live their life
regardless how you feel.
I sincerely doubt your life would hold anything that
would tempt me.
Of course not--I don't live a life of temptations as you apparently
do.
Sad...must be boring
I don't live my life appealing to my base appetites like you do.
Is that all you think we do? LOL
I, however, will be living long after your appetites have consumed
Living is enjoying, life, flowers, love, Choices. It is better to live and
love than die of old age in loneness.
you.
Statistics show it's safe enough.
To whom?
Everyone.
Bethe? Reptile?
Them too, since they are apparently alive and well enough to shoot off
their keyboards here on Usenet.
They had a hard time and is lucky to be here.
Have you ever had a pregnancy? If not then you have no right to talk.
I doubt the at- risk women would agree.
I doubt that people who have been killed on the highway would agree
that driving in a car is safe. Yet people still do it because
statistically the benefits outweigh the risks.
Pregnancy doesn't,
Yes it does.
So you was pregnant at one time?
Perhaps you should have subjected the idea of pregnancy to the
cost-benefit analysis you now want to subject it to BEFORE you got
pregnant. Ostensibly that is why you are complaining.
Complaining?
Sounds that way to me.
Cannot read? Answering a question not complaining.
You asked what damage pregnancy had done me, I answered.
That is because you came from a position that pregnancy is some
disease that must be prevented--a damaging, debilitating, dangerous
health condition.
I am willing to bet that there are a lot of women that had at least some
problems, correction most of the women.
I have traveled around the world and did Not meet any women that had a
perfect pregnancy, all of them had problems.Can you say the same?
It has been shown that you are being extremist.
No it shows that you are, Sexkitten is being a realist.
Granted I could have done without the second kid, but it wasn't like it
was
something I did deliberately.
Yes, engaging in the act which creates children wasn't deliberate.
Thank you for agreeing that it wasn't deliberate.
I was on birth control at the time.
Everyone knows birth control is not as reliable as abstinence. if you
didn't want children, you shouldn't have engaged in acts which create
them.
Ahh.. Mother Teresa, thank you for that input. Are you so lonely that you
are jealous and want nobody else to enjoy life's little pleasures that you
are unable to enjoy yourself.
However, be
prepared to accept the fact that the benefits do in fact outweigh the
costs, which means you argument for abortion falls flat on its face.
The benefits outweigh the costs to*some* women.
*yawn*
Bored already? Then go find something else to do other than harassing here.
Others prefer not to become
a statistic.
And in doing so become one anyway.
(They do keep numbers on abortions, you know.)
And miscarriage's, births, deaths, stillborns, etc, I could go on. But I
think you get the picture.
I'd like to see your proof that it never is.
Strawman.
Then what are you arguing for, if you know it's dangerous?
Driving on the highway is ten times more dangerous.
Sure- in nations where *options* are available.
Why is any of this a surprise to you? Of course where cars aren't a
cultural habit fewer people die. Is that what you are arguing for, a
ban on cars the same as you argue for a ban on fetuses?
<chuckle>
Now where did I say that all women should abort?
You don't even understand the implications of your own positions, do
you? That's typically leftist: shallow and ignorant.
No, I think you don't understand your positon. We ask for choice, not big
brother controling every aspect of our lives. You seem to want nothing short
of total control of everything or is it possible you want to be controled.
Pick your choice, because if our government gets this involved then what
happened to a free country. Dictatorship here we come...
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
25 Nov 2003 11:22:10 PM |
|
|
"--tomcat--" <not@naddress.com> wrote in message news:<bprb3o$1r5k3r$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
Possibly the first honest words to come from you.
That's an idiotic thing to say considering the length of my PH and the
fact that I have posted many times on politics and history...most of
which contain commonly-known facts that you would have to deny.
First, how do I know that you even have a PH.
You're kidding me, right? (You and sk are a perfect couple. That is,
perfectly stupid.)
Second, even if you do, as far as I can tell you truly did not earn it.
You don't "earn" a PH. You create one over the time you spend on
Usenet.
2.] Comparing the fetus to people who knowingly commit force against
others decimates your argument that they are not indeed fully human.
By your definition, then you agree that the fetus is not fully human yet.
No, my definition merely proves the proabortion argument illogical.
I do not argue that pregnancy is a force, but that doesn't render my
position that the fetus is human invalid just because some people's
arguments are stupid. You can still be human and not be committing a
force.
In order to justify your position, you have to show how pregnancy is a
show of violent, life threatening force for every abortion committed.
In order to justify Your position, you have to show how a crime is being
commited by removing a not fully human/fetus from a womb.
Since my position is that the fetus is fully human and alive, removing
it from the womb and killing it is evil.
Good thing I don't live by your opinion, then.
You might one day since your position is extremist. Not even a court
of law would agree with you arguing the way you do.
If letting women having a choice of what they can or cannot do with their
own body is an extremist, then by this definition I am.
Except that if you support abortion, what you support is letting women
have a choice over someone else's body, since abortion has little to
do with HER body.
Is *that* where all this jealousy stems from?
Rest assured that you are fooling yourself if you think you've gotten
anything over on me, or that your debating even holds a candle to my
own.
I think hers is a blow torch to your matchstick.
Interesting you use the word "blow" in a sentence to describe her.
How apt.
You don't have the capability to live life the way I do. Therefore
you aren't even programmed to want it.
Who would want it when it sounds pretty sad.
How could it sound sad since I never told you anything about it?
Programmed? If we are just robots being programmed,
Human beings have a programming in that it could be termed a
conscience. In some (like you and sk here) it's not fully functional,
but you get the idea.
It's been eventful and I've
rarely been bored.
Well, that's certainly a gold standard to live up to.
Then change you attitude at least, you will have your own opinion either
way, but you can stop being rude about it and let others live their life
regardless how you feel.
How have I not "let others live their lives?"
Apparently you and sexkitten will continue to lead your stupidlives
regardless of how logical someone else's arguments against them are.
I sincerely doubt your life would hold anything that
would tempt me.
Of course not--I don't live a life of temptations as you apparently
do.
Sad...must be boring
Nope.
I don't live my life appealing to my base appetites like you do.
Is that all you think we do?
I know it's what you do.
I, however, will be living long after your appetites have consumed
Living is enjoying, life, flowers, love, Choices.
Well, for some people. If someone happens to be living inside their
mother, they apparently aren't entitled to live, enjoyment, flowers,
love, or choices.
(Fricking hippy.)
It is better to live and
love than die of old age in loneness.
See if you still believe that after you die.
Bethe? Reptile?
Them too, since they are apparently alive and well enough to shoot off
their keyboards here on Usenet.
They had a hard time and is lucky to be here.
It had nothing to do with luck, but rather the fact that they live in
post-industrialized nations. (You know, where we use plurals.)
Have you ever had a pregnancy? If not then you have no right to talk.
I have every right to say whatever I want.
I doubt the at- risk women would agree.
I doubt that people who have been killed on the highway would agree
that driving in a car is safe. Yet people still do it because
statistically the benefits outweigh the risks.
Pregnancy doesn't,
Yes it does.
So you was pregnant at one time?
Nice grammatical usage of a past tense, there.
You asked what damage pregnancy had done me, I answered.
That is because you came from a position that pregnancy is some
disease that must be prevented--a damaging, debilitating, dangerous
health condition.
I am willing to bet that there are a lot of women that had at least some
problems, correction most of the women.
So? I am willing to bet there are a lot of people with a myriad of
medical problems caused by *something.*
I have traveled around the world and did Not meet any women that had a
perfect pregnancy, all of them had problems.
So?
It has been shown that you are being extremist.
No it shows that you are, Sexkitten is being a realist.
Since sexkitten has never been acquainted with reality, that's
amusing.
Granted I could have done without the second kid, but it wasn't like it
was
something I did deliberately.
Yes, engaging in the act which creates children wasn't deliberate.
Thank you for agreeing that it wasn't deliberate.
That was sarcasm. It most certainly was deliberate.
I was on birth control at the time.
Everyone knows birth control is not as reliable as abstinence. if you
didn't want children, you shouldn't have engaged in acts which create
them.
Ahh.. Mother Teresa, thank you for that input.
You're welcome.
Are you so lonely
Nope. Married, thank you very much.
that you
are jealous
Of you people? Not in a hundred years.
and want nobody else to enjoy life's little pleasures
Apparently not even you people enjoyed them since you had to pay to
have the problems that resulted from your stupid behavior corrected.
Of course, it's a laugh that you think your penile pleasures are worth
someone else's life.
It's also a laugh that you're so hung up on thinking that I called you
a robot. Apparently you're programmed to act like an animal.
that you
are unable to enjoy yourself.
I am? Really? Someone forgot to tell me that.
However, be
prepared to accept the fact that the benefits do in fact outweigh the
costs, which means you argument for abortion falls flat on its face.
The benefits outweigh the costs to*some* women.
*yawn*
Bored already? Then go find something else to do other than harassing here.
I've been here longer than you and will be here after you're gone.
<chuckle>
Now where did I say that all women should abort?
You don't even understand the implications of your own positions, do
you? That's typically leftist: shallow and ignorant.
No, I think you don't understand your positon.
Do tell me what MY position is.
We ask for choice,
No, you ask for the freedom to kill that which you create by not being
willing to control your irresponsible behavior.
Typical that you won't ever say what choices you support, someone else
has to do it for you.
not big
brother controling every aspect of our lives.
Antinomian, aren't we.
You seem to want nothing short
of total control of everything
Apparently you aren't familiar with PHs.
or is it possible you want to be controled.
I control myself, thank you. Unlike some people.
Pick your choice, because if our government gets this involved then what
happened to a free country.
Lol, I can't wait to see what you think you know about government.
Apparently it doesn't occur to you that government controls your right
to make a decision on the law. But since their decision just happened
to support you, that's ok.
Dictatorship here we come...
Ignorance and simplicity, there you are.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "--tomcat--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
01 Dec 2003 02:45:50 PM |
|
|
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311252122.413e750b@posting.google.com...
"--tomcat--" <not@naddress.com> wrote in message
news:<bprb3o$1r5k3r$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de>...
Possibly the first honest words to come from you.
That's an idiotic thing to say considering the length of my PH and the
fact that I have posted many times on politics and history...most of
which contain commonly-known facts that you would have to deny.
First, how do I know that you even have a PH.
You're kidding me, right? (You and sk are a perfect couple. That is,
perfectly stupid.)
Yes. I noticed you cannot spell sexkitten, if that is what you are trying to
spell.
Second, even if you do, as far as I can tell you truly did not earn it.
You don't "earn" a PH. You create one over the time you spend on
Usenet.
2.] Comparing the fetus to people who knowingly commit force against
others decimates your argument that they are not indeed fully human.
By your definition, then you agree that the fetus is not fully human
yet.
No, my definition merely proves the proabortion argument illogical.
I do not argue that pregnancy is a force, but that doesn't render my
position that the fetus is human invalid just because some people's
arguments are stupid. You can still be human and not be committing a
force.
That is your opinion.
In order to justify your position, you have to show how pregnancy is a
show of violent, life threatening force for every abortion committed.
In order to justify Your position, you have to show how a crime is being
commited by removing a not fully human/fetus from a womb.
Since my position is that the fetus is fully human and alive, removing
it from the womb and killing it is evil.
Good thing I don't live by your opinion, then.
You might one day since your position is extremist. Not even a court
of law would agree with you arguing the way you do.
If letting women having a choice of what they can or cannot do with
their
own body is an extremist, then by this definition I am.
Except that if you support abortion, what you support is letting women
have a choice over someone else's body, since abortion has little to do
with HER body.
Exactly what do you mean "has Little to do with Her body" I could read into
this, but I would like you to clarify this statement please.
Is *that* where all this jealousy stems from?
Rest assured that you are fooling yourself if you think you've gotten
anything over on me, or that your debating even holds a candle to my
own.
I think hers is a blow torch to your matchstick.
Interesting you use the word "blow" in a sentence to describe her.
How apt.
Misdirection?
You don't have the capability to live life the way I do. Therefore
you aren't even programmed to want it.
Who would want it when it sounds pretty sad.
How could it sound sad since I never told you anything about it?
Lets see, no children, wanting others to control what you do with your own
body. More if you want, but that would be infringing on your rights as a
person, which is why I only put just what was in this post.
Programmed? If we are just robots being programmed,
Human beings have a programming in that it could be termed a
conscience. In some (like you and sk here) it's not fully functional,
but you get the idea.
A conscience has nothing to do with programming, unless you want to call a
newborn with a conscience.
I see that you still have the problem with spelling sexkitten, so shall I
return the insult and say you are not fully functional too?
It's been eventful and I've
rarely been bored.
Well, that's certainly a gold standard to live up to.
Then change you attitude at least, you will have your own opinion either
way, but you can stop being rude about it and let others live their life
regardless how you feel.
How have I not "let others live their lives?"
Correction, Not wanting others to live their lives without your
interference.
Apparently you and sexkitten will continue to lead your stupidlives
regardless of how logical someone else's arguments against them are.
Do you live with us? Otherwise how do you really know that our lives as you
put it is stupid.
I sincerely doubt your life would hold anything that
would tempt me.
Of course not--I don't live a life of temptations as you apparently
do.
Sad...must be boring
Nope.
What you have never experience you will never miss.
I don't live my life appealing to my base appetites like you do.
Is that all you think we do?
I know it's what you do.
Ahhh.... Peeping tom, shall I call the cops? :-)
Exactly how well do you know us? Where is your proof other than the
newsgroups? Have you been watching us from around the corner? Maybe you even
know where we live. If not then you truly don't know us do you?
I, however, will be living long after your appetites have consumed
Living is enjoying, life, flowers, love, Choices.
Well, for some people. If someone happens to be living inside their
mother, they apparently aren't entitled to live, enjoyment, flowers,
love, or choices.
(Fricking hippy.)
(Fricking old maid.)
I can keep returning the wanna be insults if you want to, or we can have a
reasonable discussion with insulting each other, your choice. By the way I
happen to like "hippies"
they care about others and their feelings.
It is better to live and
love than die of old age in loneness.
See if you still believe that after you die.
I believe I can, (well maybe not) considering I am an Atheist. Hey I think
your right!!! LOL
Bethe? Reptile?
Them too, since they are apparently alive and well enough to shoot off
their keyboards here on Usenet.
They had a hard time and is lucky to be here.
It had nothing to do with luck, but rather the fact that they live in
post-industrialized nations. (You know, where we use plurals.)
Considering the problems they had, it is luck, even living in
post-industrialized nations.
Have you ever had a pregnancy? If not then you have no right to talk.
I have every right to say whatever I want.
You may have a right to state your opinions, but not to tell others how to
live their lives. Here is a statement you said exactly word for word.
Quote
"You don't have the authority to speak about the betterment of others
since you've never contributed anything to such a cause."
end of quote.
I doubt the at- risk women would agree.
I doubt that people who have been killed on the highway would
agree
that driving in a car is safe. Yet people still do it because
statistically the benefits outweigh the risks.
Pregnancy doesn't,
Yes it does.
So you was pregnant at one time?
Nice grammatical usage of a past tense, there.
Sorry (were)
You asked what damage pregnancy had done me, I answered.
That is because you came from a position that pregnancy is some
disease that must be prevented--a damaging, debilitating, dangerous
health condition.
I am willing to bet that there are a lot of women that had at least some
problems, correction most of the women.
So? I am willing to bet there are a lot of people with a myriad of
medical problems caused by *something.*
And they went to a doctor.
I have traveled around the world and did Not meet any women that had a
perfect pregnancy, all of them had problems.
So?
Just proves that you don't care what happens to women as long as you get
what you want.
It has been shown that you are being extremist.
No it shows that you are, Sexkitten is being a realist.
Since sexkitten has never been acquainted with reality, that's
amusing.
And you know How? Very amusing.
Granted I could have done without the second kid, but it wasn't like
it
was
something I did deliberately.
Yes, engaging in the act which creates children wasn't deliberate.
Thank you for agreeing that it wasn't deliberate.
That was sarcasm. It most certainly was deliberate.
So does that mean you were there at the time?
I was on birth control at the time.
Everyone knows birth control is not as reliable as abstinence. if you
didn't want children, you shouldn't have engaged in acts which create
them.
Ahh.. Mother Teresa, thank you for that input.
You're welcome.
Are you so lonely
Nope. Married, thank you very much.
Then I hope it is a happy marriage. Because here you seem to be very
miserable.
that you
are jealous
Of you people? Not in a hundred years.
Like I said earlier, what you have never experience you will never miss.
and want nobody else to enjoy life's little pleasures
Apparently not even you people enjoyed them since you had to pay to
have the problems that resulted from your stupid behavior corrected.
Of course, it's a laugh that you think your penile pleasures are worth
someone else's life.
Still that is your opinion not mine.
It's also a laugh that you're so hung up on thinking that I called you
a robot. Apparently you're programmed to act like an animal.
Your right, it is a laugh, since I only replied to your comment and yet here
you are still bringing it up. You are really hung up on that.
By the way, I have seen animals treat each other better than most humans. If
you want to classify me as an animal, then you truly Honor me.
that you
are unable to enjoy yourself.
I am? Really? Someone forgot to tell me that.
Then, I was mistaken.
However, be
prepared to accept the fact that the benefits do in fact outweigh
the
costs, which means you argument for abortion falls flat on its
face.
The benefits outweigh the costs to*some* women.
*yawn*
Bored already? Then go find something else to do other than harassing
here.
I've been here longer than you and will be here after you're gone.
And your point to this statement.
<chuckle>
Now where did I say that all women should abort?
You don't even understand the implications of your own positions, do
you? That's typically leftist: shallow and ignorant.
No, I think you don't understand your positon.
Do tell me what MY position is.
You made a comment about Our positions first. So tell me what Our positions
are, then I will comment on Yours.
We ask for choice,
No, you ask for the freedom to kill that which you create by not being
willing to control your irresponsible behavior.
If that is what you think...
Typical that you won't ever say what choices you support, someone else
has to do it for you.
I support Pro-Choice, which means I support Her decision on what happens to
Her own body. Just as I support My decision on what happens to mine.
Freedom of Choice is my stance.
not big
brother controling every aspect of our lives.
Antinomian, aren't we.
We? So I shall I presume that you are in agreement with me?
You seem to want nothing short
of total control of everything
Apparently you aren't familiar with PHs.
With what you post all the time, I believe I know all I want to.
or is it possible you want to be controled.
I control myself, thank you. Unlike some people.
So, then is it possible that you just want to control others?
It seems to me to be that way in what You want, and not wanting others to
live their own lives.
Pick your choice, because if our government gets this involved then what
happened to a free country.
Lol, I can't wait to see what you think you know about government.
(sheds tears) Oh what ever happened to our precious Constitution. Will we
ever get it back. (sheds more tears)
Apparently it doesn't occur to you that government controls your right
to make a decision on the law. But since their decision just happened
to support you, that's ok.
So you already lost your belief that we can make a difference, and have the
right to vote. Since when does the governments decisions have any bearing on
what I believe.
Dictatorship here we come...
Ignorance and simplicity, there you are.
Pot to Kettle.
--S
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: NOT Health Care |
23 Nov 2003 06:52:44 PM |
|
|
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1414fd53.0311231150.61ff9176@posting.google.com...
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<bpmukk$1qjkv1$ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |