| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
25 Jun 2004 10:09:57 PM |
| Object: |
"Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.How dare Congress take our hard earned tax dollars and
support the very murders that most Americans
oppose.Thankfully,Gov.Bush has cut funding for overseas
abortions.Voters should speak up this November and let our politicians
know: NO Federal funding for abortions ! ! !
.
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
02 Jul 2004 11:36:30 AM |
|
|
On 2 Jul 2004 09:26:36 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<9qb9e09j2h1v0efhdd3v8uspamo6s3utr6@4ax.com>...
On 29 Jun 2004 08:01:17 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
[...]
"No one gives a crap what an anonymous scumbag like yourself has to
say."
Did you...
"No one gives a crap what an anonymous scumbag like yourself has to
say."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
28 Jun 2004 08:48:32 AM |
|
|
On 28 Jun 2004 06:13:56 -0700, (J Young) in
alt.abortion with message-id
<9c2d0f9a.0406280513.7cd9a87@posting.google.com> wrote:
sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message news:<c30d43e8.0406272049.4ab48a6e@posting.google.com>...
[.......................]
Because I can read their Annual Report, which is posted online. Last
year (2002-2003 Annual Report), they performed approximately 227,000
abortions. That is less than 1/5th the total number performed.
Your lie has been exposed. Again.
Mark Sebree
You're an *****.You just proved my point for me(227,000 babies killed).
No baby is killed in an abortion.
The difference between a baby and a fetus has been established for
years by statute following Roe, and people who want abortions are
going to get them. They always have. The public decision is whether
they're going to be safe and available to all income groups or only to
the rich.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
28 Jun 2004 09:18:01 AM |
|
|
On 28 Jun 2004 06:13:56 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message news:<c30d43e8.0406272049.4ab48a6e@posting.google.com>...
[.......................]
Because I can read their Annual Report, which is posted online. Last
year (2002-2003 Annual Report), they performed approximately 227,000
abortions. That is less than 1/5th the total number performed.
Your lie has been exposed. Again.
Mark Sebree
You're an *****.
Speak for yourself, *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 11:55:38 AM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com>
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) wrote in
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) wrote in
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is
funding for abortions.
really?
cite your references for this.
i suspect you cannot since your claim is false.
Federal funding for Planned Parenthood,for one.
really now, don't you know that most readers here are aware of planned
parenthoods expenditures?
would you like to try again, or admit you made up yoru claim?
what you and i are doing here is presenting a picture of your credibility to
readers. you should respond as if you care about that.
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.PP admits as
such;
Of course they get federal funding, BUT NOT FOR ABORTIONS.
Idiot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 10:48:08 AM |
|
|
On 27 Jun 2004 07:09:07 -0700,
AOLoser "J. Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.PP
admits...
"Admits?" Try, "acknowledges."
...as such;why do you deny it?There are approx. 1 1/4 million
abortions performed annually in US.PP performs about 1/2 of
those.PP admits as such.why do you deny it?
Actually, Illiterate Loser, what you are whining about makes
as much sense as debating who gets to benefit people by setting
the most broken arms, or by doing the greater number of bypass
surgeries, The fact is that over time, Planned Parenthood has
provided the REMEDY of abortion to many millions of women who
have sought it, thus enabling them to put their lives back on track,
and immediately UNDOING the unwanted and ill-timed pregnancies,
and thus *restoring* their well-being and full range of future oppor-
tunities to PRE-ill- timed-pregnacy levels. It becomes just as though
the gametes had never met. Harmless, and **enormously** bene-
ficial.
So no matter HOW many times ANY compassionate and legiti-
mate provider of this remedy has accomplished that, he is a HERO
for having done so in the face of threatened adversity from loath-
some, hateful, and ignorant Anti-Choice bigots. No matter WHO
owns or runs the runs the facility in which he/she works.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 06:10:14 PM |
|
|
(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) wrote in message news:<40e0e985.25904369@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 27 Jun 2004 07:09:07 -0700,
AOLoser "J. Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.PP
admits...
"Admits?" Try, "acknowledges."
If I meant"acknowledges",I would have wrote"acknowledges".The
anonymous coward Chilton,hiding behind a new alias,once again shows
his arrogance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 06:26:29 PM |
|
|
On 27 Jun 2004 16:10:14 -0700,
AOLoser "J. Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
AOLoser "J. Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.PP
admits...
"Admits?" Try, "acknowledges."
If I meant"acknowledges",I would have wrote"acknowledges".
I wasn't saying that you *meant* to say "acknowledge." To the
contrary, had you used that word instead, it would have denoted
that you just **might** posess at least a MARGINAL modicum of
intelligence. And were capable of saying something HONEST. How-
ever, those are about the LAST qualities that we are **ever** likely
to see from *you*, illiterate bigot.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 12:50:27 PM |
|
|
On 27 Jun 2004 07:09:07 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns9514F145CECD7keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406261751.49e24a08@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns951465C4A1F51keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406251909.3a286d2e@posting.google.com:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is
funding for abortions.
really?
cite your references for this.
i suspect you cannot since your claim is false.
Federal funding for Planned Parenthood,for one.
really now, don't you know that most readers here are aware of planned
parenthoods expenditures?
would you like to try again, or admit you made up yoru claim?
what you and i are doing here is presenting a picture of your credibility to
readers. you should respond as if you care about that.
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.
Then you shall have no problem with supporting that claim, with
credible evidence, right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 02:26:36 PM |
|
|
Sappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
news:v52ud010ocnnq7tomc4rgg9fc7lguc2idt@4ax.com:
On 27 Jun 2004 07:09:07 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns9514F145CECD7keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406261751.49e24a08@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns951465C4A1F51keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406251909.3a286d2e@posting.google.com:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is
funding for abortions.
really?
cite your references for this.
i suspect you cannot since your claim is false.
Federal funding for Planned Parenthood,for one.
really now, don't you know that most readers here are aware of planned
parenthoods expenditures?
would you like to try again, or admit you made up yoru claim?
what you and i are doing here is presenting a picture of your
credibility to readers. you should respond as if you care about that.
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.
Then you shall have no problem with supporting that claim, with
credible evidence, right?
i believe he did not support his allegation since, as with so many otehr of
his allegations, it is false.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 09:46:38 PM |
|
|
Sappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<v52ud010ocnnq7tomc4rgg9fc7lguc2idt@4ax.com>...
On 27 Jun 2004 07:09:07 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns9514F145CECD7keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406261751.49e24a08@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns951465C4A1F51keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406251909.3a286d2e@posting.google.com:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is
funding for abortions.
really?
cite your references for this.
i suspect you cannot since your claim is false.
Federal funding for Planned Parenthood,for one.
really now, don't you know that most readers here are aware of planned
parenthoods expenditures?
would you like to try again, or admit you made up yoru claim?
what you and i are doing here is presenting a picture of your credibility to
readers. you should respond as if you care about that.
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.
Then you shall have no problem with supporting that claim, with
credible evidence, right?
You can do your own reading.http://www.plannedparenthood.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
28 Jun 2004 08:52:25 PM |
|
|
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406271846.73b8c980@posting.google.com:
Sappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<v52ud010ocnnq7tomc4rgg9fc7lguc2idt@4ax.com>...
On 27 Jun 2004 07:09:07 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns9514F145CECD7keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406261751.49e24a08@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns951465C4A1F51keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406251909.3a286d2e@posting.google.com:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is
funding for abortions.
really?
cite your references for this.
i suspect you cannot since your claim is false.
Federal funding for Planned Parenthood,for one.
really now, don't you know that most readers here are aware of
planned parenthoods expenditures?
would you like to try again, or admit you made up yoru claim?
what you and i are doing here is presenting a picture of your
credibility to readers. you should respond as if you care about
that.
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.
Then you shall have no problem with supporting that claim, with
credible evidence, right?
You can do your own reading.http://www.plannedparenthood.org/
thet site does not support your claim
why don't you admit you lied and move on.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
28 Jun 2004 09:17:41 AM |
|
|
On 27 Jun 2004 19:46:38 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Sappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<v52ud010ocnnq7tomc4rgg9fc7lguc2idt@4ax.com>...
On 27 Jun 2004 07:09:07 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns9514F145CECD7keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406261751.49e24a08@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns951465C4A1F51keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406251909.3a286d2e@posting.google.com:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is
funding for abortions.
really?
cite your references for this.
i suspect you cannot since your claim is false.
Federal funding for Planned Parenthood,for one.
really now, don't you know that most readers here are aware of planned
parenthoods expenditures?
would you like to try again, or admit you made up yoru claim?
what you and i are doing here is presenting a picture of your credibility to
readers. you should respond as if you care about that.
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.
Then you shall have no problem with supporting that claim, with
credible evidence, right?
You can do your own reading.http://www.plannedparenthood.org/
But you cannot pin point where your claim exists?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 06:05:15 PM |
|
|
Sappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<v52ud010ocnnq7tomc4rgg9fc7lguc2idt@4ax.com>...
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.
Then you shall have no problem with supporting that claim, with
credible evidence, right?
http://www.plannedparenthood.org
Read for yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 06:52:59 PM |
|
|
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406271505.2039205c@posting.google.com:
Sappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:<v52ud010ocnnq7tomc4rgg9fc7lguc2idt@4ax.com>...
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.
Then you shall have no problem with supporting that claim, with
credible evidence, right?
http://www.plannedparenthood.org
Read for yourself.
since you can't support your false claim, shouldn't you apologize for having
posted it?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
28 Jun 2004 08:05:22 AM |
|
|
On 27 Jun 2004 16:05:15 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Sappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message news:<v52ud010ocnnq7tomc4rgg9fc7lguc2idt@4ax.com>...
I stand by my statement that PP receives federal funding.
Then you shall have no problem with supporting that claim, with
credible evidence, right?
http://www.plannedparenthood.org
Read for yourself.
Where?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bobs Boyfriend" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
26 Jun 2004 10:33:34 PM |
|
|
In article <9c2d0f9a.0406261751.49e24a08@posting.google.com>,
(J Young) wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns951465C4A1F51keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0406251909.3a286d2e@posting.google.com:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.
really?
cite your references for this.
i suspect you cannot since your claim is false.
Federal funding for Planned Parenthood,for one.
Conversely, why should anyone's tax dollars fund another person's family
planning efforts.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
26 Jun 2004 09:20:17 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com>
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) wrote in
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.
really?
cite your references for this.
i suspect you cannot since your claim is false.
Federal funding for Planned Parenthood,for one.
Since only about 10% of PP's business is abortion services, you'd have
to be pretty stupid to think that they spend ANY federal money on
abortions.
Maybe you believe all that idiotic ***** about PP doing nothing but
abortions?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "N.O.Y.B." |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
26 Jun 2004 03:59:14 AM |
|
|
I doubt it. Population control has always been a noble cause. Overpopulation
caused by unwanted and unplanned births is a big problem in some countries.
Apart from the point, what about all that money that the government is
plundering on senseless schemes like the war on drugs, military action, and
other unnecessary activities?
I'll bet if all the money that is wasted on such pointless activities was
given back to the taxpayers who worked hard for the money that has been
taken from them we would see more social problems being solved. A lot of
taxpayer's money goes to funding excessive government intrusion in our
private lives and we don't want it and we certainly don't need it. As one
poster on here once said, 90% of the social problems (if not more) would be
solved overnight if unnecessary busybodyism was eliminated.
To me, forcing women to endure unwanted pregnancies is most certainly
unnecessary and is quite evil, and of course forced childbirth (due to
abortion being illegal) contributes to increased crime rates and social
meddling. One good measure of how civilised a country is, is how it allows
people to actually own and take control of their own bodies (so long as they
don't harm other people or their property - and in so far as I know abortion
certainly does NOT do harm - except to the blindly hateful mission of
control freaks who want to destroy countless women's lives by imposing
severe harships on them).
The best form of government is that which espouses TRUE capitalism (not the
sugar-coated fascism that we are currently experiencing) while maintaining
and protecting citizen's rights. By rights, I also include the right to
control one's own body. In other words, a minimal government.
Hopefully some day that very form of government will reign. Hopefully....I
won't hold my breath.
The NOYB Poster
rhinestoneau@yahoo.com.au
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.How dare Congress take our hard earned tax dollars and
support the very murders that most Americans
oppose.Thankfully,Gov.Bush has cut funding for overseas
abortions.Voters should speak up this November and let our politicians
know: NO Federal funding for abortions ! ! !
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
25 Jun 2004 11:58:01 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.
They don't, lunatic.
How dare Congress take our hard earned tax dollars and
... use them to kill thousands of innocent Iraqis.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
29 Jun 2004 05:39:04 PM |
|
|
http://www.zwire.com/site/12134258.html
John Kerry is screwed. He probably drycracked her pooper and doesn't want
the world to know!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
26 Jun 2004 06:57:39 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.How dare Congress take our hard earned tax dollars and
support the very murders that most Americans
oppose.
The war? Abu Gharaib? Which ones?
Thankfully,Gov.Bush has cut funding for overseas
abortions.Voters should speak up this November and let our politicians
know: NO Federal funding for abortions ! ! !
--
--sexkitten--Lead me not into temptation -- I can find the way myself.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
25 Jun 2004 10:30:45 PM |
|
|
On 25 Jun 2004 20:09:57 -0700,
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) wrote:
Perhaps the most perverse act...
...we see on the part of people are the postings of hate-filled and
disinformational propaganda by bigots in Usenet, and all the other
sociopathic actions they engage in.
RRR cultists : USA :: drops of arsenic : glass of drinking water
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
26 Jun 2004 09:36:25 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jun 2004 20:09:57 -0700, (J Young) in
alt.abortion with message-id
<9c2d0f9a.0406251909.3a286d2e@posting.google.com> wrote:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.
I feel the same way about giveaways like food stamps and welfare.
ow dare Congress take our hard earned tax dollars and
support the very murders that most Americans
oppose.
Abortion is not murder and most Americans support the Freedom of
Choice.
Thankfully,Gov.Bush has cut funding for overseas
abortions.Voters should speak up this November and let our politicians
know: NO Federal funding for abortions ! ! !
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
26 Jun 2004 11:57:26 PM |
|
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:kc2rd0936va7per3eectk65egc02fn8isj@4ax.com...
On 25 Jun 2004 20:09:57 -0700, (J Young) in
alt.abortion with message-id
<9c2d0f9a.0406251909.3a286d2e@posting.google.com> wrote:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.
I feel the same way about giveaways like food stamps and welfare.
ow dare Congress take our hard earned tax dollars and
support the very murders that most Americans
oppose.
Abortion is not murder and most Americans support the Freedom of
Choice.
Being that there are over 300 million (or some such number) Americans, more
than 150 million must have affirmed their position in the matter.
How do you know this?
Thankfully,Gov.Bush has cut funding for overseas
abortions.Voters should speak up this November and let our politicians
know: NO Federal funding for abortions ! ! !
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
27 Jun 2004 06:55:35 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:57:26 -0700, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id <CusDc.8187$6r1.7855@fed1read06> wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:kc2rd0936va7per3eectk65egc02fn8isj@4ax.com...
On 25 Jun 2004 20:09:57 -0700, (J Young) in
alt.abortion with message-id
<9c2d0f9a.0406251909.3a286d2e@posting.google.com> wrote:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.
I feel the same way about giveaways like food stamps and welfare.
ow dare Congress take our hard earned tax dollars and
support the very murders that most Americans
oppose.
Abortion is not murder and most Americans support the Freedom of
Choice.
Being that there are over 300 million (or some such number) Americans, more
than 150 million must have affirmed their position in the matter.
How do you know this?
Abortion restrictions keep failing at voting booths and no
Constitutional Amendment has passed to restrict the Freedom of Choice.
I refer you to Prohibition as an example of what happens when a law is
in effect the general public opposes.
A lot of smoke an mirrors exist in this arena for political purposes.
Many bills have been introduced, even passed, and struck down by the
courts by politicians who can say they passed legislation (and thus
get the rabid anti-choice vote) and at the same time will not alienate
the silent majority who support the freedom of choice to the point of
voting those politicians out of office for eliminating it.
Meanwhile the drug industry quietly keeps making advances toward
making pregnancy a voluntary condition and thus eliminating almost all
necessity for abortion. RU486 and the morning after pills are only a
small start.
With all the potential sales and profits in this arena there is
absolutely no doubt that at some point a woman will be able to easily
prevent her pregnancy or (with a morning after pill) insure she does
not become pregnant and there will be no clinics to picket or
specialists to list on web sites or shoot at. Every GP will be able
to prescribe such drugs and many of them will be available over the
counter or in vending machines. Surgical elective abortion will
seldom occur and those that do will be performed at your local
hospital.
Will there be setbacks? Sure. But in the long run it will be left to
each individual woman to make her own decision because social
legislation always fails if it opposes the will of the majority or
even a large minority.
I would point out the total success of almost universal legislation in
eliminating prostitution, another attempt at social legislation. It
doesn't exist except in the few places it is legal. Right?
Thankfully,Gov.Bush has cut funding for overseas
abortions.Voters should speak up this November and let our politicians
know: NO Federal funding for abortions ! ! !
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SomeSappyWriter" |
|
| Title: Re: "Not with MY tax dollars ! ! ! " |
26 Jun 2004 06:51:39 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jun 2004 20:09:57 -0700, (J Young) wrote:
Perhaps the most perverse act the federal gov't. engages in is funding
for abortions.
Like the abortions our country has performed on Iraqi children.
I'm sure you're proud.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
