Science > Abortion > Now that the "Debating Season" has ended, is the enthusiasm of Kerry supporters fading?
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Gactimus" |
| Date: |
17 Oct 2004 07:42:12 PM |
| Object: |
Now that the "Debating Season" has ended, is the enthusiasm of Kerry supporters fading? |
Now that the "debating season" has concluded and the campaign is
entering
its final phase, many of you who have been paying attention to
the
national polls may have noticed that there has been a slight
swing back in
Bush's favor. I have been watching this closely and there are
two points I
see represented in these poll numbers which I think indicate
that the
burst of enthusiasm among Kerry supporters that followed from
his
performance in the debates has now peaked and we are settling
down into a
race which, though still tight, gives the clear advantage to
President
Bush.
I believe that in the final analysis we can conclude that John
Kerry
benefited from giving a focus for "the Bush haters" during the
debates,
when he could directly confront and, at times, lecture the
President in a
way that gave voice to the hard core Bush opposition, but that
this moment
has passed and two factors are now weakening Kerry's candidacy,
which are
reflected in his poll numbers.
The first is that Kerry - and his supporters - can no longer
look forward
to the opportunity to face President Bush directly and vent
their anger.
The second, and potentially more damaging for Kerry, is that the
large
number of anti-war voters who were looking to his candidacy to
voice their
views now may be reassessing their attitudes, a fact that is
reflected in
both the internal numbers of these recent polls and in the very
slight
rise in the percentages you can see for Ralph Nader. In spite of
Kerry's
repeated insistence that he has had only "one policy" with
regard to Iraq,
the truth is that he made a choice in September to argue that he
would see
the occupation through to a successful conclusion and he managed
to avoid
alienating anti-war voters during the debates by confronting
President
Bush directly. With the conclusion of the debates, some of these
voters
will look elsewhere, which must cause Kerry and his advisors
great
concern.
Before going any further it may help to examine the most recent
national
polls on the presidential election:
Current National Polls of Likely Voters as of October 17
Poll Dates Bush Kerry Nader
---------- ---- ----- -----
ABC News/Washington Post 50 46 2
Gallup 52 44 1
Zogby 46 44 1
Time Magazine 48 47 3
Newsweek Magazine 50 44 1
TIPP 48 45 2
There are two things to note in the above listing of national
polls. The
first is that all of them give Bush an edge that ranges from one
to eight
points, depending upon which poll you examine. This is quite
different
than what we were seeing during the "debating season" when some
of the
important polls put Kerry ahead or dead even with the President.
And I
could add that if you were to view the internal numbers on some
of these
polls you would see that, in direct contrast to what we were
witnessing
right after the first presidential debate, Kerry's "Likely
Voter"
percentages are below his "Registered Voter" numbers, which is a
complete
turnaround from just a couple of weeks ago. Just to mention two
of these
polls by way of example, both Gallup and Newsweek have Kerry at
46% among
"Registered Voters" and 44% among "Likely Voters," while Bush's
support
increases when you go from "Likely" to "Registered," a trend
that is
common to most of the other polls as well. Clearly the
enthusiasm for
Kerry's candidacy has dropped over the last couple of weeks.
But the second thing to note about the above numbers is, in my
opinion,
even bigger. Notice that three of the polls have Ralph Nader
above 1%. I
cannot recall any of the major polls having Nader's numbers
above 1% while
we were in the midst of the presidential debates - I even
remember one
Zogby poll had Nader at 0% - and this may be a second indicator
of waning
support for Kerry. The anti-war voters did not get what they
wanted from
Kerry in the debates and, even though he may have picked up some
undecideds in the middle of the political spectrum by making a
strong
argument for seeing the war in Iraq through to a successful
conclusion -
put aside your impressions of the conviction with which you may
believe he
made his case for a moment - he can no longer hang onto the most
committed
anti-war voters now that his chance to confront Bush directly
has passed.
This is a serious obstacle to Kerry's prospects for success
right now.
So what does all of this mean for the rest of the campaign? For
President
Bush it's pretty simple, stay on message and concentrate on
turning out
the vote. But for Kerry it's different. He must try to reinfuse
his
candidacy with the enthusiasm it had during the debates and
address the
"Nader Factor," which is still important in a number of the
battleground
states. So I expect to see the following from Kerry over the
next couple
of weeks:
1. Kerry will try to put the debates front-and-center again,
possibly even
calling for another debate. He won't get it, but he needs to
reach for it
anyway.
2. Kerry will have to try to convince Nader to drop out and end
his
candidacy. This may even go so far as a "Kerry - Nader Summit."
3. If Kerry cannot convince Nader to drop out of the race he
will have to
address domestic issues that are important to Nader voters, such
as the
Environment, drilling in ANWAR, alternative energy, and more.
Even though
this will deflect attention from his Iraq policy he must do it.
4. When addressing the issue of Iraq Kerry will have to speak
about
getting the troops home more than he has recently. We all
understand the
problems this will create for him but he must try to keep anti-
war voters
behind him.
5. Kerry will begin to take aim at "vulnerable" groups within
Bush's
demographic base of support, such as seniors and women, and try
to instill
fear within them so as to weaken Bush's standing with these
voters. This
is essentially an attempt to weaken the enthusiasm of Bush's
base. We are
already seeing this with the privatization of Social Security
ads, expect
him to return to guns and more in the days to come. This will
take him
"off message" on Iraq, so it must be recognized as a sign of
weakness.
6. Kerry will try to reinvigorate his base by recalling their
attention to
the Florida recount and crying out that the Republicans want to
suppress
the vote among African-Americans and others. We've also seen
this tactic
employed already, but it has the potential to create an even
greater
backlash among the majority of Americans who found fault with
the tactics
the Democrats employed to try to win Florida in 2000.
No, we cannot claim that this race is in the bag for Bush by any
means.
But Kerry is facing problems that are far worse than those
confronting the
President at this moment. Let's hope it stays that way.
.
|
|
| User: "Bush 04" |
|
| Title: Decisive! |
17 Oct 2004 08:16:39 PM |
|
|
After that second plane hit, his chief of staff wispering
"America is under attack" in his ear, would John Kerry
have sat decisively in that classroom, listening on as
children read "My Pet Goat"?
Even Democrats have to admit that, no, John Kerry would
not have sat in that classroom, nor stayed an additional
20 minutes in that school after finally leaving the classroom,
knowing that Americans were dying in New York and
Washington.
John Kerry is not a decisive man of action, like George
Bush, and he would have flipped flopped.
Think about that. First he wants to be in the classroom, and
even travels all the way to Florida to visit the classroom,
and then upon forst word of a terrorist attack he'd decide that
he didn't want to be in the classroom.
That's a flip flop. Kerry is a flip flopper.
Bush isn't. Bush STAYED in that classroom. Heck, even when
they finally managed to pry him out, he still stayed in the
school for more than 20 minutes. That's decisive. That's a man
who makes up his mind and doesn't waver. That's a man who
doesn't send "mixed messages."
.
|
|
|
| User: "RUSiriusA" |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
17 Oct 2004 08:15:03 PM |
|
|
In article <cZ-dnWNZ-dxqiu7cRVn-vw@comcast.com>,
"Bush '04" <jaytem@gaydar.co.uk> wrote:
After that second plane hit, his chief of staff wispering
"America is under attack" in his ear, would John Kerry
have sat decisively in that classroom, listening on as
children read "My Pet Goat"?
Even Democrats have to admit that, no, John Kerry would
not have sat in that classroom, nor stayed an additional
20 minutes in that school after finally leaving the classroom,
knowing that Americans were dying in New York and
Washington.
John Kerry is not a decisive man of action, like George
Bush, and he would have flipped flopped.
Think about that. First he wants to be in the classroom, and
even travels all the way to Florida to visit the classroom,
and then upon forst word of a terrorist attack he'd decide that
he didn't want to be in the classroom.
That's a flip flop. Kerry is a flip flopper.
Bush isn't. Bush STAYED in that classroom. Heck, even when
they finally managed to pry him out, he still stayed in the
school for more than 20 minutes. That's decisive. That's a man
who makes up his mind and doesn't waver. That's a man who
doesn't send "mixed messages."
Bush is STILL there.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Julian D." |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
17 Oct 2004 10:39:32 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:16:39 -0400, "Bush '04" <jaytem@gaydar.co.uk>
wrote:
After that second plane hit, his chief of staff wispering
"America is under attack" in his ear, would John Kerry
have sat decisively in that classroom, listening on as
children read "My Pet Goat"?
Even Democrats have to admit that, no, John Kerry would
not have sat in that classroom, nor stayed an additional
20 minutes in that school after finally leaving the classroom,
knowing that Americans were dying in New York and
Washington.
John Kerry is not a decisive man of action, like George
Bush, and he would have flipped flopped.
Think about that. First he wants to be in the classroom, and
even travels all the way to Florida to visit the classroom,
and then upon forst word of a terrorist attack he'd decide that
he didn't want to be in the classroom.
That's a flip flop. Kerry is a flip flopper.
Bush isn't. Bush STAYED in that classroom. Heck, even when
they finally managed to pry him out, he still stayed in the
school for more than 20 minutes. That's decisive. That's a man
who makes up his mind and doesn't waver. That's a man who
doesn't send "mixed messages."
Kerry admitted he sat stunned and did not know what to do for 40
minutes when the planes hit.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
18 Oct 2004 01:06:55 AM |
|
|
"Julian D." <jules@ersatz.com> wrote
Kerry admitted he sat stunned and did not know what to
do for 40 minutes when the planes hit.
Bush lost to Al Gore by more than 500,000 votes.
I suppose that somebody like you -- impressed, as you are,
by Bush's "Military Service" and his "record" over the
last four years -- that doesn't sway you in the least.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
18 Oct 2004 01:05:28 AM |
|
|
"Julian D." <jules@ersatz.com> wrote
Kerry admitted he sat stunned and did not know what to
do for 40 minutes when the planes hit.
There was absolutely *Nothing* Kerry could do. He was
just a Senator. He wasn't the "President," he wasn't the
Commander & Chief of the military.
Bush was.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pookie" |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
18 Oct 2004 04:01:29 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jaytem@gaydar.co.uk> wrote in message
news:zIadnZIu4Lk6xu7cRVn-uw@comcast.com...
"Julian D." <jules@ersatz.com> wrote
Kerry admitted he sat stunned and did not know what to
do for 40 minutes when the planes hit.
There was absolutely *Nothing* Kerry could do. He was
just a Senator. He wasn't the "President," he wasn't the
Commander & Chief of the military.
Bush was.
& what could he have done in a few minutes?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Velvet" |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
18 Oct 2004 04:48:24 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jaytem@gaydar.co.uk> wrote in message
news:zIadnZIu4Lk6xu7cRVn-uw@comcast.com...
"Julian D." <jules@ersatz.com> wrote
Kerry admitted he sat stunned and did not know what to
do for 40 minutes when the planes hit.
There was absolutely *Nothing* Kerry could do. He was
just a Senator. He wasn't the "President," he wasn't the
Commander & Chief of the military.
If Kerry had had his way, we would have had no F-15s and F-16s to send up
anyway.
Come to think of it, the Israelis would have had to drop spitballs on
Saddam's reactor.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
17 Oct 2004 11:55:25 PM |
|
|
"Julian D." <jules@ersatz.com> wrote in message
news:kle6n05smk8ofbsu5p2al38glftcruku36@4ax.com...
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:16:39 -0400, "Bush '04" <jaytem@gaydar.co.uk>
wrote:
After that second plane hit, his chief of staff wispering
"America is under attack" in his ear, would John Kerry
have sat decisively in that classroom, listening on as
children read "My Pet Goat"?
Even Democrats have to admit that, no, John Kerry would
not have sat in that classroom, nor stayed an additional
20 minutes in that school after finally leaving the classroom,
knowing that Americans were dying in New York and
Washington.
John Kerry is not a decisive man of action, like George
Bush, and he would have flipped flopped.
Think about that. First he wants to be in the classroom, and
even travels all the way to Florida to visit the classroom,
and then upon forst word of a terrorist attack he'd decide that
he didn't want to be in the classroom.
That's a flip flop. Kerry is a flip flopper.
Bush isn't. Bush STAYED in that classroom. Heck, even when
they finally managed to pry him out, he still stayed in the
school for more than 20 minutes. That's decisive. That's a man
who makes up his mind and doesn't waver. That's a man who
doesn't send "mixed messages."
Kerry admitted he sat stunned and did not know what to do for 40
minutes when the planes hit.
Got some proof?
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Justice Cow" |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
18 Oct 2004 08:17:38 AM |
|
|
In article <kle6n05smk8ofbsu5p2al38glftcruku36@4ax.com>,
Julian D. <jules@ersatz.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:16:39 -0400, "Bush '04" <jaytem@gaydar.co.uk>
wrote:
After that second plane hit, his chief of staff wispering
"America is under attack" in his ear, would John Kerry
have sat decisively in that classroom, listening on as
children read "My Pet Goat"?
Even Democrats have to admit that, no, John Kerry would
not have sat in that classroom, nor stayed an additional
20 minutes in that school after finally leaving the classroom,
knowing that Americans were dying in New York and
Washington.
John Kerry is not a decisive man of action, like George
Bush, and he would have flipped flopped.
Think about that. First he wants to be in the classroom, and
even travels all the way to Florida to visit the classroom,
and then upon forst word of a terrorist attack he'd decide that
he didn't want to be in the classroom.
That's a flip flop. Kerry is a flip flopper.
Bush isn't. Bush STAYED in that classroom. Heck, even when
they finally managed to pry him out, he still stayed in the
school for more than 20 minutes. That's decisive. That's a man
who makes up his mind and doesn't waver. That's a man who
doesn't send "mixed messages."
Kerry admitted he sat stunned and did not know what to do for 40
minutes when the planes hit.
nono...kerry's not the president yet and the story's a little skewed.
instead of reading his pdb issued within the previous month entitled
"bin laden determined to strike inside the us" and remembering the last
attack within the us on the towers and instead of he or SOMEone putting
two and two together and getting on the phone to the security advisor
and having that office immediately notify ny officials after the first
plane hit that this was probably a terrorist attack, instead of actually
LEADING this country and doing his job, bush sat in a schoolroom and
looked uncomfortable.
and while he sat there stunned and in shock, people were not evacuated
and were told to go back into the towers, that the fire would be
contained because no one thought it was a terrorist attack.
--
http://tinyurl.com/6t6c3
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doorman" |
|
| Title: The vile spewers of mindless blather thread |
18 Oct 2004 09:05:23 AM |
|
|
If you are a fellow American patriot and lover of the First Amendment, then
by these presents greetings. It is good that you seek rational and
democratic discussion of the great and urgent issues facing our nation.
Unfortunately, I think you've come to the wrong place. See the bottom of
this post for additional evidence.
Especially if you remember the old days of thoughtful discussion in the
newsgroups, this triumph of noise over signal may sadden you. Hyde Park of
the world and cheap advertising are all that remain.
However, there are many alternatives. For example, there are many more
"refined" forums on the Web where polite discussions can be found. Even
better if you can build bridges to real people in the physical world. For
example, you could treat a rational RINO to a movie--like Fahrenheit 9/11.
Lots of good books still being published. (Michael Moore has two new ones.)
You could write a letter for your local paper--you'll reach more "normal"
people and probably have more impact than here. Or you could donate to the
political campaigns--I confess I've already made seven donations. Just
remember that big money is harming democracy, that BushCo has more money
than anyone, and that if money alone decides elections then the American
republic is already dead.
Last, but MOST important: VOTE! Your nation needs you NOW!
On the other hand, if you are a Bushevik troll, then in the immortal
floor-of-the-Senate words of the unloved ***** Cheney: "Go f*ck yourself.
When selecting "featured" posts for this mindless blather thread, the
following factors are considered:
1. Ad hominem evasion of real issues.
2. Stone-headed fanaticism.
3. Generalized hate speech, such as racism.
4. Spinning diversion or trivialization of issues.
5. Blatant lies or hypocrisy.
6. Overt trolling, such as extensive cross-posting.
7. Incomprehensible writing.
8. Vicious negative emotionalism, especially amusing personal attacks.
[For the purposes of this thread, the freshest original parts are usually
sufficient, but use the last entry on the References: header line if you
want to see the full context.]
Justice Cow <justicecow@hotmail.cow> wrote:
<old stuff snip>
nono...kerry's not the president yet and the story's a little
skewed.
instead of reading his pdb issued within the previous month entitled
"bin laden determined to strike inside the us" and remembering the
last attack within the us on the towers and instead of he or
SOMEone putting two and two together and getting on the phone to
the security advisor and having that office immediately notify ny
officials after the first plane hit that this was probably a
terrorist attack, instead of actually LEADING this country and
doing his job, bush sat in a schoolroom and looked uncomfortable.
and while he sat there stunned and in shock, people were not
evacuated and were told to go back into the towers, that the fire
would be contained because no one thought it was a terrorist attack.
[Loony post, but might be trolling from either side.]
--
We don't know if 9/11 could have been stopped--but we do know Dubya
failed to stop it. That's the FACT.
You want steady leadership for disastrous change?
Attack, lie, spin. Dubya's REAL trifecta.
Trolls fed to "The vile spewers of mindless blather thread".
('Doorman' is a role-based pen name of Shannon Jacobs, copyright
2004.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "abelincoln" |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
17 Oct 2004 08:31:54 PM |
|
|
bush is consistently stupid. he gets one stupid idea, like his belief
that the earth is flat and he refuses to give it up. bush will insist
he's right no matter how often he is proven wrong.
some people call that type of consistency "strong leadership." hey you
now where bush stands, even if it's in quick sand, he's there and he
wants you to join him. nothing better than to sink in quicksand while
you shout loudly that you're standing on a firm ground.
bush's rock is between his ears.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saved By Jesus!!!!" |
|
| Title: Damn liberals! |
17 Oct 2004 08:48:28 PM |
|
|
Cowardly George Bush, Draft-Dodger-Turned-Deserter & Chief:
http://www.awolbush.com
Who was really behind all those pro-war protests:
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0325-03.htm
How Saddam got his Anthrax (and other weapons):
http://www.progressive.org/0901/anth0498.html
Enron (and friends) before you ever heard of Enron:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/24/eveningnews/main303149.shtml
1) How Bush won Florida, and 2) the court settlement brother Jeb
signed when he got sued for it:
1)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/cta/progs/newsnight/palast.ram
2)
http://www.naacp.org/news/electreformsettlement.shtml
How ***** Cheney cashed in on the first Gulf war, helping to rebuild
Iraq for Saddam Hussein:
http://www.progressive.org/wm0900.htm
Bush senior pre-approved Saddam's invasion of Kuwait:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Julian D." |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
17 Oct 2004 10:40:06 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:31:54 -0400, abelincoln
<bushsucks@whitehouse.com> wrote:
bush is consistently stupid. he gets one stupid idea, like his belief
that the earth is flat and he refuses to give it up. bush will insist
he's right no matter how often he is proven wrong.
some people call that type of consistency "strong leadership." hey you
now where bush stands, even if it's in quick sand, he's there and he
wants you to join him. nothing better than to sink in quicksand while
you shout loudly that you're standing on a firm ground.
bush's rock is between his ears.
Kerry will lose to such a man?
Doesnt say much about Kerry, does it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Decisive! |
17 Oct 2004 11:54:45 PM |
|
|
"Julian D." <jules@ersatz.com> wrote in message
news:5oe6n05fr0p3m2u2lmmje30omd1msv8sqs@4ax.com...
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:31:54 -0400, abelincoln
<bushsucks@whitehouse.com> wrote:
bush is consistently stupid. he gets one stupid idea, like his belief
that the earth is flat and he refuses to give it up. bush will insist
he's right no matter how often he is proven wrong.
some people call that type of consistency "strong leadership." hey you
now where bush stands, even if it's in quick sand, he's there and he
wants you to join him. nothing better than to sink in quicksand while
you shout loudly that you're standing on a firm ground.
bush's rock is between his ears.
Kerry will lose to such a man?
Unfortunately, voting qualifications don't require an IQ test, and a stupid
person's vote is equal to mine. It's one of those social-promotion programs
you hear so much about....
Doesnt say much about Kerry, does it?
If Kerry loses, it's because he underestimated the power of stupid people in
large groups.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doorman" |
|
| Title: The vile spewers of mindless blather thread |
18 Oct 2004 07:45:32 AM |
|
|
If you are a fellow American patriot and lover of the First Amendment, then
by these presents greetings. It is good that you seek rational and
democratic discussion of the great and urgent issues facing our nation.
Unfortunately, I think you've come to the wrong place. See the bottom of
this post for additional evidence.
Especially if you remember the old days of thoughtful discussion in the
newsgroups, this triumph of noise over signal may sadden you. Hyde Park of
the world and cheap advertising are all that remain.
However, there are many alternatives. For example, there are many more
"refined" forums on the Web where polite discussions can be found. Even
better if you can build bridges to real people in the physical world. For
example, you could treat a rational RINO to a movie--like Fahrenheit 9/11.
Lots of good books still being published. (Michael Moore has two new ones.)
You could write a letter for your local paper--you'll reach more "normal"
people and probably have more impact than here. Or you could donate to the
political campaigns--I confess I've already made seven donations. Just
remember that big money is harming democracy, that BushCo has more money
than anyone, and that if money alone decides elections then the American
republic is already dead.
Last, but MOST important: VOTE! Your nation needs you NOW!
On the other hand, if you are a Bushevik troll, then in the immortal
floor-of-the-Senate words of the unloved ***** Cheney: "Go f*ck yourself.
When selecting "featured" posts for this mindless blather thread, the
following factors are considered:
1. Ad hominem evasion of real issues.
2. Stone-headed fanaticism.
3. Generalized hate speech, such as racism.
4. Spinning diversion or trivialization of issues.
5. Blatant lies or hypocrisy.
6. Overt trolling, such as extensive cross-posting.
7. Incomprehensible writing.
8. Vicious negative emotionalism, especially amusing personal attacks.
[For the purposes of this thread, the freshest original parts are usually
sufficient, but use the last entry on the References: header line if you
want to see the full context.]
Julian D. <jules@ersatz.com> wrote:
<old stuff snip>
Kerry will lose to such a man?
Doesnt say much about Kerry, does it?
--
We don't know if 9/11 could have been stopped--but we do know Dubya
failed to stop it. That's the FACT.
You want steady leadership for disastrous change?
Attack, lie, spin. Dubya's REAL trifecta.
Trolls fed to "The vile spewers of mindless blather thread".
('Doorman' is a role-based pen name of Shannon Jacobs, copyright
2004.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Saved By Jesus!!!!" |
|
| Title: Keep the vision! |
17 Oct 2004 08:47:48 PM |
|
|
Stand behind the vision, America, stand behind
Bush.
When Bush says "I know exactly where I want to
lead this nation" he's not forgetting that he's already
in the fourth year of his administration, that he has
already lead the nation. When Bush says that he has
a plan to cut the deficit in half in five years he's not
forgetting that he's already been in office for our
years, and gave us the record high deficits in the
first place.
That's your job.
It's your job as good Republicans to ignore this
blaringly obvious fact. It's your job to remind
yourself and those around you that Bush is a complete
idiot, that he doesn't know any better. Nobody told
Bush that this election is about WHERE HE HAS
ALREADY LEAD THE NATION, not about what he
thinks he might get around to only after four years in
office.
It's that Karl Rove. It's his fault. He should have informed
Bush that he's been President for more than three years,
and should have a record of accomplishments to look back
on, instead of talking about how he's *Finally* going to
do something that Americans actually cares about.
And ***** Cheney. It's his fault too. He's got a lesbian
daughter. A real *****. No doubt he's under the spell of
the Liberal-Socialist-Homosexual conspiracy. If he wasn't
he would have informed Bush that he's already in the fourth
year of his administration, and he shouldn't be admitting the
utter failure of those four years during the debates and in
his commercials.
He should stick to rapping himself up in the bodies of the
3000 Americans who died because of his family's close
and personal relationship with the Bin Laden family. He
should stick with that, instead of pretending that his term
of office would only begin next year. He should point to
his failure on 9/11 again & again, reminding Americans
what his family will do to them if the voters start pissing
them off.
And, oh, more fat tax cuts for the rich. Lots more. Keep 'em
coming. We'll say "when."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kurttrail" |
|
| Title: Re: Now that the "Debating Season" has ended, is the enthusiasm of Kerry supporters fading? |
17 Oct 2004 09:25:29 PM |
|
|
Gactimus wrote:
Now that the "debating season" has concluded and the campaign is
entering
its final phase, many of you who have been paying attention to
the
national polls may have noticed that there has been a slight
swing back in
Bush's favor.
LOL! Bush is gaining points in the Red states, but trending downward in the
swing states.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/oct/oct13.html
http://www.electoral-vote.com/oct/oct15.html
http://www.electoral-vote.com/oct/oct16.html
http://www.electoral-vote.com/oct/oct17.html
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
