| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
09 Feb 2006 12:54:36 AM |
| Object: |
NPR story -- news to me |
Wow. No one in this group listens to NPR? 'Cause unless I'm thoroughly
out of the loop, a story like this is definitely news:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5195551
.
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: NPR story -- news to me |
09 Feb 2006 07:48:45 AM |
|
|
On 8 Feb 2006 22:54:36 -0800, wrote:
Wow. No one in this group listens to NPR? 'Cause unless I'm thoroughly
out of the loop, a story like this is definitely news:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5195551
I do expect to see quite soon the anti crowd making the same claims
about this story that they make about breast cancer.
False ones, that is.
---
I bought a Venus Fly Trap today. I was going to name it
‘Republican’, but the fly trap is beneficial to the
environment. I’ll save that name - someday I might find
a plant that eats poor people and minorities.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: NPR story -- news to me |
09 Feb 2006 01:14:38 PM |
|
|
What claims would those be? Not a rhetorical question.
I'm not asking about breast cancer claims -- not at issue just here.
You're claiming some parity between breast cancer claims and some kind
of claims that could be made with regard to the ongoing science on this
fetal cell issue (no conclusions yet in this vein). What kinds of
claims do you imagine might be made, that are of a kind with whatever
claims you understand are made regarding breast cancer?
By "false ones," do you mean that you've already concluded in your own
mind what science has not yet concluded about this fetal cell issue? I
don't mean to conclude that I've concluded that prematurely about your
POV, of course. That wouldn't be rational. ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: NPR story -- news to me |
09 Feb 2006 01:37:39 PM |
|
|
<scott.marquardt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139512478.631930.128840@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
What claims would those be? Not a rhetorical question.
I'm not asking about breast cancer claims -- not at issue just here.
You're claiming some parity between breast cancer claims and some kind
of claims that could be made with regard to the ongoing science on this
fetal cell issue (no conclusions yet in this vein). What kinds of
claims do you imagine might be made, that are of a kind with whatever
claims you understand are made regarding breast cancer?
By "false ones," do you mean that you've already concluded in your own
mind what science has not yet concluded about this fetal cell issue? I
don't mean to conclude that I've concluded that prematurely about your
POV, of course. That wouldn't be rational. ;-)
Pro-Choicers and gays have made false claims for so long, they assume that
others do it who didn't join the gayblade or the abortionists in making lies
that wimps in government gave into.
They assume since they are liars that others are liars, too.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: NPR story -- news to me |
09 Feb 2006 01:58:43 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in
news:sPMGf.1953$UD1.1280@bignews2.bellsouth.net:
<scott.marquardt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139512478.631930.128840@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
What claims would those be? Not a rhetorical question.
I'm not asking about breast cancer claims -- not at issue just here.
You're claiming some parity between breast cancer claims and some
kind of claims that could be made with regard to the ongoing science
on this fetal cell issue (no conclusions yet in this vein). What
kinds of claims do you imagine might be made, that are of a kind with
whatever claims you understand are made regarding breast cancer?
By "false ones," do you mean that you've already concluded in your
own mind what science has not yet concluded about this fetal cell
issue? I don't mean to conclude that I've concluded that prematurely
about your POV, of course. That wouldn't be rational. ;-)
Pro-Choicers and gays
I guess that included you too then Joanny.
have made false claims for so long, they assume
that others do it who didn't join the gayblade or the abortionists in
making lies that wimps in government gave into.
They assume since they are liars that others are liars, too.
In your case Joanny, there is no "assumption". That you are a liar is a
known fact in these ngs.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
