Science > Abortion > Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences?
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"bobandcarole" |
| Date: |
02 Dec 2006 07:19:14 AM |
| Object: |
Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of
Medical Consequences?
By Steve Jalsevac
December 1, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Kathleen Melonakos, M.A., R.N.,
is a nurse and a representative of the Delaware Family Foundation.
Melonakos says that while she worked as an RN for several years during
the eighties and nineties at Stanford University Medical Center, she
"saw some of the damage homosexuals do to their bodies with some of
their sexual practices."
The experiences of the unnecessary suffering that Melonakos saw
eventually led to her current role of informing the public about the
serious medical issues related to homosexual practices. She also
exposes the tragic unwillingness of the medical community to admit the
truth about the death and sufferings experienced by persons who engage
in those practices.
In her article, "Why Isn't Homosexuality Considered A Disorder On The
Basis Of Its Medical Consequences?", republished in full on
LifeSiteNews.com, Melonakos bluntly, but also compassionately addresses
this issue that has become so important to her.
The former San Francisco nurse writes that she "knew personally a
prominent dermatologist, a dentist, an engineer, and a hairdresser that
died in their mid-forties of infectious diseases related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
She adds that, "As far as I know, there is no other group of people in
the United States that dies of infectious diseases in their mid-forties
except practicing homosexuals." "This, to me," she emphasises, "is
tragic, when we know that homosexuality can be prevented, in many
cases, or substantially healed in adulthood when there is sufficient
motivation and help."
The article continues to point out a long list of diseases to which
active homosexuals are vulnerable and "the solid, irrefutable evidence
that there are lethal consequences of engaging in the defining features
of male homosexuality--that is, promiscuity and anal intercourse".
The author holds the American Psychiatric Association and the American
Psychological Association "criminally responsible" for their complicity
in helping to create "the culture of denial about the lethalness of
homosexual sex" and their "attitude of political correctness that is
killing a substantial proportion of persons" engaged in active
homosexuality.
She also implicate those same, highly influential organizations for
allowing themselves to be influenced by gay activists to deny that many
homosexual persons can indeed be helped by therapy to overcome their
same-sex tendencies.
Melonakos writes, "What if doctors said, 'We refuse to treat cancer
(or, say, alcoholism) because we only achieve a 50% cure rate--and many
people who don't want to be cured find it oppressive that we do cure
the others?' Why wouldn't the lawsuits for malpractice be filed?"
The article concludes, "What will it take to insist on truth? Lawsuits?
Protests? In my opinion, doctors and other health professionals must
exert pressure, or share culpability."
See the complete article, republished with permission from Narth:
Why Isn't Homosexuality Considered A Disorder On The Basis Of Its
Medical Consequences?
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/nov/061130a.html
**NOTE: this article contains explicit information about homosexual
sexual practices that is unsuitable for young readers.
.
|
|
| User: "RamRod Sword of Baal RamRod @truthonly" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
02 Dec 2006 07:05:18 PM |
|
|
"bobandcarole" <bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165065554.250553.272880@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of
Medical Consequences?
By Steve Jalsevac
December 1, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Kathleen Melonakos, M.A., R.N.,
is a nurse and a representative of the Delaware Family Foundation.
Melonakos says that while she worked as an RN for several years during
the eighties and nineties at Stanford University Medical Center, she
"saw some of the damage homosexuals do to their bodies with some of
their sexual practices."
The experiences of the unnecessary suffering that Melonakos saw
eventually led to her current role of informing the public about the
serious medical issues related to homosexual practices. She also
exposes the tragic unwillingness of the medical community to admit the
truth about the death and sufferings experienced by persons who engage
in those practices.
===============================
So here we have a nurse who says she knows more that experts from APA and
various Doctors, this is the exact reason whey Nurses are not permitted to
practice medicine.
Of course Kathleen Melonakos happens to be the founder of Delaware Family
Foundation, an anti Gay organization, surprise surprise !!!!!
When will bob&carole get some AMA or official Government quotes to prove
what they are trying to tell us, why? Because they cannot find any that back
up their whacko ideas.
.
|
|
|
| User: "J bob&carole Young" |
|
| Title: Why Do Right Wing ChristoFascist Homosexual Perverts Chose to Rape Children And To Be Gay? |
02 Dec 2006 07:31:25 PM |
|
|
RamRod Sword of Baal "RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> said:
"bobandcarole" <bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165065554.250553.272880@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text muted]
eventually led to her current role of informing the public about the
serious medical issues related to homosexual practices. She also
exposes the tragic unwillingness of the medical community to admit the
truth about the death and sufferings experienced by persons who engage
in those practices.
Why did Vice President ***** Cheney force his daughter to become a homosexual?
Was it because he's just another right wing religious fanatic whose obsessed
with homosexual sex? It's all the raving right wing fundamentalist Christo-
fascist fanatics talk about these days. Like anti-Abortion, anti-rights
activist Reverend Ted Haggard, they all spend their evenings getting high on
Meth and having illicit homosexual sex while sanctimoniously preaching hatred
against gays during the daytime. This has gone on for decades.
Here's a list of convicted right wing religious pedophiles, all leaders in the
Christian right wing community:
Republican Mark Foley, exposed for luring young underage Congressional pages in
internet chat rooms.
(1) Republican Mayor Philip Giordano - 37 year sentence for sexually
abusing 8 and 10 year old girls.
http://www.armchairsubversive.com/Giordano.htm
(2) Republican Congressman, Donald "Buz" Lukens, convicted of having
sex with a minor.
http://www.leadershipinstitute.org/04RESOURCES/Speeches-SurvivalValue...
(3) Republican fundraiser, Richard A. Delgaudio, convicted of child
porn charges.
http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/2153721/detail.html
(4) Republican activist, Mark A. Grethen, convicted on six counts of
sex crimes involving children.
(5) Republican activist, Randal David Ankeney, convicted of assaulting
a 14-year-old girl.
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/1130885/detail.html
(6) Republican Congressman, Dan Crane, had sex with a minor.
http://archive.salon.com/col/cona/1998/10/05cona.html
(7) Republican activist and Christian Coalition leader, Beverly
Russell, admitted to an incestuous relationship with his step
daughter.
http://wlo.org/nw/nww5.html
(8) Republican anti-abortion activist, John Allen Burt, was charged
with sexual misconduct involving a 15 year old girl.
(9) Republican talk show host Jon Matthews pleaded guilty to exposing
his genitals to an 11 year old girl.
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/news/111203_local_matthews.html
(10) Republican congressman, Robert Bauman, Marlyand: Married dad of
four ,was charged with committing oral sodomy on a 16-year-old boy.
(Salon, 1.1.04) http://www.glinn.com/news/h122989a.htm
(11) Republican activist, Marty Glickman convicted on four counts of
unlawful sexual activity with a juvenile and one count of the delivery
of LSD.
(12) Howard L. Brooks, a Republican staffer, charged with molesting a
12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.
http://www.sacbee.com/static/live/news/calreport/N2001-11-22-2300-0.html
(13) Republican Senate candidate, John Hathaway, was accused of having
sex with his 12-year old baby sitter.
(14) Republican preacher, Stephen White, arrested after offering
to a 14-year-old boy to perform oral sex on him.
(15)Republican state Rep. Brent Parker arrested for soliciting sex
from an undercover officer posing as a male prostitute.
(16)Douglas County Election Commissioner Pat McPherson arrested for
fondling a 17-year-old girl.
(17) Republican anti-abortion activist Nicholas Morency pleaded guilty
to possessing child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty
to anybody who murders an abortion doctor.
(18) Republican legislator Edison Misla Aldarondo was sentenced to 10
years in prison for raping his daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.
(19) Republican Committee Chairman Jeffrey Patti was arrested for
distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.
(20) Republican anti-gay activist Earl "Butch" Kimmerling was
sentenced to 40 years in prison for molesting an 8-year old girl after
he
attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.
(21) Parker J. Bena, Virginia Republican activist: Convicted in 2001
of possession of child pornography. (Salon, 1.1.04)
(22) Kevin Coan, Missouri: Arrested in Illinois in 2001 for offering
to pay for sex over the Internet from a 14-year-old girl -- who turned
out to be male police officer working a chat-room sting. (Salon, 1.1.04)
(23) Richard Gardner, Nevada: Convicted in California in 1988 for lewd
and lascivious behavior with a child under the age of 14 -- a felony
sex crime. The victim was his own 12-year-old daughter. Investigation
led to exposure of two additional sex-crime convictions, one involving
the same daughter, and one involving another daughter under age 14.
(Salon, 1.1.04)
(24) Mark A. Grethen, Virginia: Convicted in 2002 on six counts of sex
crimes against children. (Salon, 1.1.04)
(25) Jeff Patti, Sparta, N.J., GOP Chair: Arrested on child
pornography charges. (NJH, 2.8.05)
(26) Fact: There's an entire newsgroup just for right-wing Christian
pedophiles. Police say a Pierce County foster dad charged with
molesting and photographing young boys in his care posted messages in
an Internet newsgroup catering to Christian pedophiles....describing
himself as a "boylover that has devoted my life to boys and
introducing the love of Christ to them." [And then this typical
hypocrite says] "homosexual desire is unnatural".
(27) Serial killer/rapist Ted Bundy campaigned for the Republican
Party
(28) Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom
Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.
(29) Republican activist Lawrence E. King, Jr. organized child sex
parties at the White House during the 1980s.
(30) Republican lobbyist Craig J. Spence organized child sex parties
at the White House during the 1980s.
* Republican anti-abortion activist Howard Scott Heldreth is a convicted
child rapist in Florida.
* Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to
molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.
* Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to fondling a 10-
year old girl and was sentenced to 10 years probation.
* Republican anti-abortion activist Nicholas Morency pleaded guilty to
possessing child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty to
anybody who murders an abortion doctor.
* Republican legislator Edison Misla Aldarondo was sentenced to 10
years in prison for raping his daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.
* Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in
federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.
* Republican campaign consultant Tom Shortridge was sentenced to three
years probation for taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.
* Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom Thurmond
had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.
* Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W. Bush commended during the
2004 presidential campaign, surrendered to police after admitting to a
sexual affair with a female juvenile.
* Republican legislator Peter Dibble pleaded no contest to having an
inappropriate relationship with a 13-year-old girl.
* Republican activist Lawrence E. King, Jr. organized child sex parties
at the White House during the 1980s.
* Republican lobbyist Craig J. Spence organized child sex parties at the
White House during the 1980s.
* Republican Congressman Donald "Buz" Lukens was found guilty of having
sex with a female minor and sentenced to one month in jail.
* Republican fundraiser Richard A. Delgaudio was found guilty of child
porn charges and paying two teenage girls to pose for sexual photos.
* Republican activist Mark A. Grethen convicted on six counts of sex
crimes involving children.
* Republican activist Randal David Ankeney pleaded guilty to attempted
sexual assault on a child.
* Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a female minor working
as a congressional page.
* Republican activist and Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell
admitted to an incestuous relationship with his step daughter.
* Republican governor Arnold Schwarzenegger allegedly had sex with a 16
year old girl when he was 28.
* Republican congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged
with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar.
* Republican Committee Chairman Jeffrey Patti was arrested for
distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.
* Republican activist Marty Glickman (a.k.a. "Republican Marty"), was
taken into custody by Florida police on four counts of unlawful sexual
activity with an underage girl and one count of delivering the drug LSD.
* Republican legislative aide Howard L. Brooks was charged with
molesting a 12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.
* Republican Senate candidate John Hathaway was accused of having sex
with his 12-year old baby sitter and withdrew his candidacy after the
allegations were reported in the media.
* Republican preacher Stephen White, who demanded a return to
traditional values, was sentenced to jail after offering $20 to a 14-year-old
boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.
* Republican talk show host Jon Matthews pleaded guilty to exposing his
genitals to an 11 year old girl.
* Republican anti-gay activist Earl "Butch" Kimmerling was sentenced to
40 years in prison for molesting an 8-year old girl after he attempted to
stop a gay couple from adopting her.
* Republican Party leader Paul Ingram pleaded guilty to six counts of
raping his daughters and served 14 years in federal prison.
* Republican election board official Kevin Coan was sentenced to two
years probation for soliciting sex over the internet from a 14-year old girl.
* Republican politician Andrew Buhr was charged with two counts of first
degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.
* Republican politician Keith Westmoreland was arrested on seven felony
counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to girls under the age of 16
(i.e. exposing himself to children).
* Republican anti-abortion activist John Allen Burt was charged with
sexual misconduct involving a 15-year old girl.
* Republican County Councilman Keola Childs pleaded guilty to molesting
a male child.
* Republican activist John Butler was charged with criminal sexual
assault on a teenage girl.
* Republican candidate Richard Gardner admitted to molesting his two
daughters.
* Republican Councilman and former Marine Jack W. Gardner was convicted
of molesting a 13-year old girl.
* Republican County Commissioner Merrill Robert Barter pleaded guilty to
unlawful sexual contact and assault on a teenage boy.
* Republican City Councilman Fred C. Smeltzer, Jr. pleaded no contest to
raping a 15 year-old girl and served 6-months in prison.
* Republican activist Parker J. Bena pleaded guilty to possession of
child pornography on his home computer and was sentenced to 30 months in
federal prison and fined $18,000.
* Republican parole board officer and former Colorado state
representative, Larry Jack Schwarz, was fired after child pornography was found
in his possession.
* Republican strategist and Citadel Military College graduate Robin
Vanderwall was convicted in Virginia on five counts of soliciting sex
from boys and girls over the internet.
* Republican city councilman Mark Harris, who is described as a "good
military man" and "church goer," was convicted of repeatedly having sex
with an 11-year-old girl and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
* Republican businessman Jon Grunseth withdrew his candidacy for
Minnesota governor after allegations surfaced that he went swimming in the nude
with four underage girls, including his daughter.
* Republican director of the "Young Republican Federation" Nicholas
Elizondo molested his 6-year old daughter and was sentenced to six years in
prison.
* Republican benefactor of conservative Christian groups, Richard A.
Dasen Sr., was charged with rape for allegedly paying a 15-year old girl for
sex.
Dasen, 62, who is married with grown children and several
grandchildren, has allegedly told police that over the past decade he paid more
than $1 million to have sex with a large number of young women.
*PENDING - Republican Mayor John Gosek, 58, of 275 West 7th Street,
Oswego, was arrested for the federal offense of "using a facility in interstate
commerce (a telephone) to knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, and
coerce an individual under the age of 18 years to engage in sexual activity for
which he could be charged with criminal offenses, that is, rape in the third
degree and criminal sexual act in the third degree" in violation of the New
York State Penal Code.
www.armchairsubversive.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Do Right Wing ChristoFascist Homosexual Perverts Chose to Rape Children And To Be Gay? |
04 Dec 2006 02:16:57 AM |
|
|
In article <MPG.1fdbf2f62c1a89f989d34@news.motzarella.org>,
J bob&carole Young <obsessed@with.fags> wrote:
RamRod Sword of Baal "RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> said:
"bobandcarole" <bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165065554.250553.272880@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text muted]
eventually led to her current role of informing the public about the
serious medical issues related to homosexual practices. She also
exposes the tragic unwillingness of the medical community to admit the
truth about the death and sufferings experienced by persons who engage
in those practices.
Why did Vice President ***** Cheney force his daughter to become a homosexual?
He didn't. ***** Cheney's daughter chose to become a homosexual.
Lesbianism is a choice.
Was it because he's just another right wing religious fanatic whose obsessed
with homosexual sex?
Why are you obsessed with right wing religious fanatics?
[snip]
.
|
|
|
| User: "ScottyFLL" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Do Right Wing ChristoFascist Homosexual Perverts Chose to Rape Children And To Be Gay? |
04 Dec 2006 11:37:30 AM |
|
|
Qazfez wrote:
Why are you obsessed with right wing religious fanatics?
Because, though a minority, they claim moral superiority and are trying
to make their beliefs the law of the land.
They are sneaky and we must watch them. A strong message was sent to
these mental midgets on November 7th. That message can be summed up as
follows: "Bye bye!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Do Right Wing ChristoFascist Homosexual Perverts Chose to Rape Children And To Be Gay? |
04 Dec 2006 01:36:51 PM |
|
|
In article <1165253850.238193.91240@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com>,
"ScottyFLL" <ScottyFLL@gmail.com> wrote:
Qazfez wrote:
Why are you obsessed with right wing religious fanatics?
Because, though a minority, they claim moral superiority and are trying
to make their beliefs the law of the land.
Sounds a lot like many homosexuals.
They are sneaky and we must watch them. A strong message was sent to
these mental midgets on November 7th. That message can be summed up as
follows: "Bye bye!"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roedy Green" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Do Right Wing ChristoFascist Homosexual Perverts Chose to Rape Children And To Be Gay? |
04 Dec 2006 05:17:38 AM |
|
|
Why disproportionately so many Republicans involved in pedophilia?
The key feature of the Republican mind is a desire to control others,
to micromanage their lives. The Republican believes he knows what is
best for everyone else. He has a simplified Archie Bunker view of the
world where he lumps his inferiors into categories, whose members he
treats as identical and interchangeable.
So what would you expect when a Republican gets around to sex? He
wants ABSOLUTE CONTROL. There are two classes of people who are most
easily controlled -- children and prostitutes. He also gets turned on
by sadism, bondage and torture. That gives him the ultimate control
over another.
It is natural for control freaks to gravitate to politics. They want
to make up rules for how everyone else has to behave. Law enforcement
and the military are also a big draw for Republicans -- the license to
bully and kill and feel profoundly virtuous.
"One of the great attractions of patriotism - it fulfills our worst
wishes. In the person of our nation we are able, vicariously, to bully
and cheat. Bully and cheat, what's more, with a feeling that we are
profoundly virtuous."
~ Aldous Huxley
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green, http://mindprod.com
Priorities: Prevent global climate destabilisation. End both wars. Prepare for oil shortages.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Do Right Wing ChristoFascist Homosexual Perverts Chose to Rape Children And To Be Gay? |
03 Dec 2006 10:43:21 AM |
|
|
Yet more ***** propaganda from that closet-case homo, Bob...
J bob&carole Young wrote:
RamRod Sword of Baal "RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> said:
"bobandcarole" <bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165065554.250553.272880@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text muted]
eventually led to her current role of informing the public about the
serious medical issues related to homosexual practices. She also
exposes the tragic unwillingness of the medical community to admit the
truth about the death and sufferings experienced by persons who engage
in those practices.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ScottyFLL" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
02 Dec 2006 07:24:28 PM |
|
|
RamRod Sword of Baal wrote:
When will bob&carole get some AMA or official Government quotes to prove
what they are trying to tell us, why? Because they cannot find any that back
up their whacko ideas.
Blob&carlo has just that one remnant of sanity: he is not going to
look for something that he knows doesn't exist.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 01:34:48 AM |
|
|
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 02:15:36 AM |
|
|
In article <AeWdnVVFItYEUu7YRVnyrQ@bt.com>,
"Kathryn" <kathrynahunternospamplease@btinternet.com> wrote:
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 12:14:28 PM |
|
|
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-4C29BB.21153604122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <AeWdnVVFItYEUu7YRVnyrQ@bt.com>,
"Kathryn" <kathrynahunternospamplease@btinternet.com> wrote:
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
Or in your case a lot of retardation
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 01:34:55 PM |
|
|
In article <3pmdnRqteYEY-OnYRVnyhw@bt.com>,
"Kathryn" <kathrynahunternospamplease@btinternet.com> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-4C29BB.21153604122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <AeWdnVVFItYEUu7YRVnyrQ@bt.com>,
"Kathryn" <kathrynahunternospamplease@btinternet.com> wrote:
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
Or in your case a lot of retardation
answer the question
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 11:48:00 AM |
|
|
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
"Kathryn" <kathrynahunternospamplease@btinternet.com> wrote:
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
That's pretty funny. Some loser trying to be clever by copying a
person's words exactly.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 01:35:58 PM |
|
|
In article <45745f50$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
"Kathryn" <kathrynahunternospamplease@btinternet.com> wrote:
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
That's pretty funny. Some loser trying to be clever by copying a
person's words exactly.
Thank you for saying it was funny. I thought so. It certainly is funny
to quote people's words exactly, because it reminds them that what they
are saying is arbitrary and anyone else could say the same thing to them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
05 Dec 2006 12:23:04 AM |
|
|
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <45745f50$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
"Kathryn" <kathrynahunternospamplease@btinternet.com> wrote:
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
That's pretty funny. Some loser trying to be clever by copying a
person's words exactly.
Thank you for saying it was funny. I thought so.
"Funny" in a pathetic way.
It certainly is funny
to quote people's words exactly, because it reminds them that what they
It shows everybody that you really are a moron who isn't capable of
writing anything original.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
05 Dec 2006 04:23:59 AM |
|
|
In article <45751048$0$34565$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <45745f50$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
"Kathryn" <kathrynahunternospamplease@btinternet.com> wrote:
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
Did you perhaps suffer a blow to the head which caused some mental
retardation?
That's pretty funny. Some loser trying to be clever by copying a
person's words exactly.
Thank you for saying it was funny. I thought so.
"Funny" in a pathetic way.
It certainly is funny
to quote people's words exactly, because it reminds them that what they
It shows everybody that you really are a moron who isn't capable of
writing anything original.
Originality isn't the issue - it was an appropriate response.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ScottyFLL" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
05 Dec 2006 10:04:03 AM |
|
|
Qazfez wrote:
Originality isn't the issue - it was an appropriate response.
It was fucking lame.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roedy Green" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
02 Dec 2006 02:15:27 PM |
|
|
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green, http://mindprod.com
Priorities: Prevent global climate destabilisation. End both wars. Prepare for oil shortages.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 02:17:49 AM |
|
|
In article <djn3n2hptc8ue1hbmrf438qdqr1srb1phs@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous because they want to be sexually
promiscuous. This really should not be news!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roedy Green" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 05:00:37 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 21:17:49 +1300, Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote,
quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
Gay people are sexually promiscuous because they want to be sexually
promiscuous. This really should not be news!
There are two main reasons:
1. both partners are men. In mixed relations it is the female doing
the most demanding of monogamy. With lesbians you have less
promiscuity.
2. If gays are forced to hide being gay, they can't live with another
gay man. They can't be seen in public with another gay man. They
can't go grocery shopping with another gay man. etc. etc. So they
get pushed into anonymous, one-time sexual encounters. That means
promiscuity.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green, http://mindprod.com
Priorities: Prevent global climate destabilisation. End both wars. Prepare for oil shortages.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 01:38:42 PM |
|
|
In article <mqv7n2lrh5r62duoa6drv5nd1q5opt9che@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 21:17:49 +1300, Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote,
quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
Gay people are sexually promiscuous because they want to be sexually
promiscuous. This really should not be news!
There are two main reasons:
1. both partners are men. In mixed relations it is the female doing
the most demanding of monogamy. With lesbians you have less
promiscuity.
2. If gays are forced to hide being gay, they can't live with another
gay man. They can't be seen in public with another gay man. They
can't go grocery shopping with another gay man. etc. etc. So they
get pushed into anonymous, one-time sexual encounters. That means
promiscuity.
Reason 1 is correct, reason 2 is *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 11:47:02 AM |
|
|
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <djn3n2hptc8ue1hbmrf438qdqr1srb1phs@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous
Unless they're not.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 01:37:38 PM |
|
|
In article <45745f16$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <djn3n2hptc8ue1hbmrf438qdqr1srb1phs@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous
Unless they're not.
Yet they so frequently are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "RamRod Sword of Baal RamRod @truthonly" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 04:49:41 PM |
|
|
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-12845D.08373805122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <45745f16$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <djn3n2hptc8ue1hbmrf438qdqr1srb1phs@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous
Unless they're not.
Yet they so frequently are.
.......And most single Heterosexual males are if they can find anyone.
It is not for the want of trying, but the lack of partners that keeps most
down into the low numbers of partners.
I suppose that is why so many sneaked in to the Gay bath houses during lunch
time, them as well as the married guys who were not getting 'it' or enough
of 'it' at home, or maybe they just liked the better sex, and the
variety...............
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 07:52:27 PM |
|
|
In article <4574a601@quokka.wn.com.au>,
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-12845D.08373805122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <45745f16$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <djn3n2hptc8ue1hbmrf438qdqr1srb1phs@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous
Unless they're not.
Yet they so frequently are.
......And most single Heterosexual males are if they can find anyone.
It is not for the want of trying, but the lack of partners that keeps most
down into the low numbers of partners.
I suppose that is why so many sneaked in to the Gay bath houses during lunch
time, them as well as the married guys who were not getting 'it' or enough
of 'it' at home, or maybe they just liked the better sex, and the
variety...............
None of that disproves my point.
.
|
|
|
| User: "RamRod Sword of Baal RamRod @truthonly" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 08:41:12 PM |
|
|
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-F9FC9C.14522705122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <4574a601@quokka.wn.com.au>,
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-12845D.08373805122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <45745f16$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <djn3n2hptc8ue1hbmrf438qdqr1srb1phs@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against
promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against
them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies
anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous
Unless they're not.
Yet they so frequently are.
......And most single Heterosexual males are if they can find anyone.
It is not for the want of trying, but the lack of partners that keeps
most
down into the low numbers of partners.
I suppose that is why so many sneaked in to the Gay bath houses during
lunch
time, them as well as the married guys who were not getting 'it' or
enough
of 'it' at home, or maybe they just liked the better sex, and the
variety...............
None of that disproves my point.
Yes it does, as it points out that most men are promiscuous given half a
chance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 09:33:10 PM |
|
|
In article <4574dc49@quokka.wn.com.au>,
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-F9FC9C.14522705122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <4574a601@quokka.wn.com.au>,
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-12845D.08373805122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <45745f16$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <djn3n2hptc8ue1hbmrf438qdqr1srb1phs@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against
promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against
them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies
anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous
Unless they're not.
Yet they so frequently are.
......And most single Heterosexual males are if they can find anyone.
It is not for the want of trying, but the lack of partners that keeps
most
down into the low numbers of partners.
I suppose that is why so many sneaked in to the Gay bath houses during
lunch
time, them as well as the married guys who were not getting 'it' or
enough
of 'it' at home, or maybe they just liked the better sex, and the
variety...............
None of that disproves my point.
Yes it does, as it points out that most men are promiscuous given half a
chance.
Irrelevant.
.
|
|
|
| User: "RamRod Sword of Baal RamRod @truthonly" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
04 Dec 2006 10:26:36 PM |
|
|
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-4DD855.16331005122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <4574dc49@quokka.wn.com.au>,
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-F9FC9C.14522705122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <4574a601@quokka.wn.com.au>,
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-12845D.08373805122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <45745f16$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <djn3n2hptc8ue1hbmrf438qdqr1srb1phs@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly
quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is
the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against
promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against
them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies
anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous
Unless they're not.
Yet they so frequently are.
......And most single Heterosexual males are if they can find anyone.
It is not for the want of trying, but the lack of partners that keeps
most
down into the low numbers of partners.
I suppose that is why so many sneaked in to the Gay bath houses during
lunch
time, them as well as the married guys who were not getting 'it' or
enough
of 'it' at home, or maybe they just liked the better sex, and the
variety...............
None of that disproves my point.
Yes it does, as it points out that most men are promiscuous given half a
chance.
Irrelevant.
Only from a viewpoint that bigots wish to show Gays in a bad light.
If most men, both gay and straight are generally promiscuous if given half a
chance then what difference does it make if some Gay people are promiscuous.
Well I suppose it could be a jealous thing, you know someone is getting more
sex than me.
Of course it is one of the Bigot's Brigade old standbyes that all have been
shown to be false.
Lets see now, here they are :-
All Gays are promiscuous.
All Gays are child molesters.
All Gays have AIDS.
All Gays eat crap.
All Gays will jump into bed with anyone else.
All Gays are trying to seduce straight men, no matter how ugly the straight
guy is.
==================================
Currently the first three are being in vogue, I expect it will not be long
before they are left out and they will move on to the next ones........
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qazfez" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
05 Dec 2006 04:27:20 AM |
|
|
In article <4574f4fd$1@quokka.wn.com.au>,
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-4DD855.16331005122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <4574dc49@quokka.wn.com.au>,
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-F9FC9C.14522705122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <4574a601@quokka.wn.com.au>,
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod @truthonly> wrote:
"Qazfez" <qazfez@o.com> wrote in message
news:qazfez-12845D.08373805122006@lust.ihug.co.nz...
In article <45745f16$0$34572$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
In article <djn3n2hptc8ue1hbmrf438qdqr1srb1phs@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly
quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is
the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against
promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against
them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies
anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous
Unless they're not.
Yet they so frequently are.
......And most single Heterosexual males are if they can find anyone.
It is not for the want of trying, but the lack of partners that keeps
most
down into the low numbers of partners.
I suppose that is why so many sneaked in to the Gay bath houses during
lunch
time, them as well as the married guys who were not getting 'it' or
enough
of 'it' at home, or maybe they just liked the better sex, and the
variety...............
None of that disproves my point.
Yes it does, as it points out that most men are promiscuous given half a
chance.
Irrelevant.
Only from a viewpoint that bigots wish to show Gays in a bad light.
If most men, both gay and straight are generally promiscuous if given half a
chance then what difference does it make if some Gay people are promiscuous.
Just use your brain. You can answer that question if you think about it.
Well I suppose it could be a jealous thing, you know someone is getting more
sex than me.
Of course it is one of the Bigot's Brigade old standbyes that all have been
shown to be false.
Lets see now, here they are :-
All Gays are promiscuous.
I didn't say all gays are promiscuous, although a lot of them are (more
than heterosexuals).
All Gays are child molesters.
All Gays have AIDS.
All Gays eat crap.
All Gays will jump into bed with anyone else.
All Gays are trying to seduce straight men, no matter how ugly the straight
guy is.
I didn't say any of those things.
==================================
Currently the first three are being in vogue, I expect it will not be long
before they are left out and they will move on to the next ones........
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Nurse Questions Why Homosexuality Not Considered Disorder on Basis of Medical Consequences? |
05 Dec 2006 12:22:06 AM |
|
|
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Qazfez <qazfez@o.com> wrote:
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
On 2 Dec 2006 05:19:14 -0800, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
s related to their
homosexual behaviour patterns".
It is not the homosexuality that is the health problem; it is the
promiscuity. If you want to campaign, campaign against promiscuity,
and stop discouraging monogamy in gays by discriminating against them
and blocking marriage.
When people are forced to hide in the closet, that implies anonymous,
one-time, promiscuous sex.
Gay people are sexually promiscuous
Unless they're not.
Yet they so frequently are.
Just as heterosexual people are frequently promiscuous. But you're a
stupid bigot and you have an agenda to push, so you ignore such facts
as that.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
