| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"George" |
| Date: |
13 Sep 2005 11:04:24 AM |
| Object: |
Oil Over Hospitals |
Today, the White House, through Cheney, ordered power restored to an
oil pipeline - at the expense of two New Orleans Hospital in desperate
need of help. The choice had to be made - do we restore power to the
two hospitals, or do instead restore power to the pipeline.
The White House had its priorities set - to hell with the hospitals,
get the pipeline running. Bush clearly cares nothing for the people of
New Orleans.
.
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
13 Sep 2005 02:20:33 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
13 Sep 2005 03:48:19 PM |
|
|
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
13 Sep 2005 06:52:39 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
04 Oct 2005 03:56:40 PM |
|
|
On 2005-09-13 16:52:39 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
The same thing your comment has to do with abortion. What are you,
some kind of control freak?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
05 Oct 2005 07:34:09 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:56:40 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <200510041356408930%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 16:52:39 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
The same thing your comment has to do with abortion. What are you,
some kind of control freak?
No, I am just tired of seeing most of the comments here not be
connected to the issue of abortion.
If I see something that is off topic I may or may not say so.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
13 Sep 2005 07:21:52 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
13 Sep 2005 11:34:45 PM |
|
|
In article <k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com>, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
No kidding! The idea that people can only discuss abortion out here is
quite strange.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
13 Sep 2005 08:21:09 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
Oil has absolutely nothing to do with abortion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
13 Sep 2005 11:34:45 PM |
|
|
In article <0luei152cnuighc0lvj63hcnq4vsqe2hp5@4ax.com>, Attila
<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
Off topic
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
04 Oct 2005 03:58:38 PM |
|
|
On 2005-09-13 18:21:09 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
Oil has absolutely nothing to do with abortion.
That isn't true. The Republicans are in office and hope to push
abortion laws on the American people. If you make others aware what a
bunch of ***** ups the Republicans are, they will work to eliminate the
Republicans which, in turn, reduces the pressure on abortion.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
13 Sep 2005 08:35:05 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:09 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
That's what alt.abortion is, at present.
Oil has absolutely nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does Heishman's *****, but since he's slinging it, why not
call him on it?
Alt newsgroups are usually trash heaps for off-topic junk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
14 Sep 2005 04:07:15 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:35:05 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<vdvei1p69mif0d5l1gg3pus3d6517blkdf@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:09 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
That's what alt.abortion is, at present.
True, and oil certainly has nothing to do with abortion.
Oil has absolutely nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does Heishman's *****, but since he's slinging it, why not
call him on it?
Alt newsgroups are usually trash heaps for off-topic junk.
Which is no reason for ignoring it. Perhaps if such off topic items
were publicly noted there would be fewer of them.
Of course, the god flakes are going to continue to spam no matter what
anyone says.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
14 Sep 2005 05:29:16 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:07:15 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:35:05 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<vdvei1p69mif0d5l1gg3pus3d6517blkdf@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:09 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
That's what alt.abortion is, at present.
True, and oil certainly has nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does your off topic "off topics," but who's complaining?
:-)
Oil has absolutely nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does Heishman's *****, but since he's slinging it, why not
call him on it?
Alt newsgroups are usually trash heaps for off-topic junk.
Which is no reason for ignoring it. Perhaps if such off topic items
were publicly noted there would be fewer of them.
You've been doing for long and it seems you're the one who's ignored.
Perhaps you should ignore them.
Of course, the god flakes are going to continue to spam no matter what
anyone says.
And the normal people will continue to have something to say in
return.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
14 Sep 2005 06:16:10 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:29:16 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<dpufi1di20h8cjv36f0smucafnc19ifkfk@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:07:15 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:35:05 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<vdvei1p69mif0d5l1gg3pus3d6517blkdf@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:09 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
That's what alt.abortion is, at present.
True, and oil certainly has nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does your off topic "off topics," but who's complaining?
Several people.
:-)
Oil has absolutely nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does Heishman's *****, but since he's slinging it, why not
call him on it?
Alt newsgroups are usually trash heaps for off-topic junk.
Which is no reason for ignoring it. Perhaps if such off topic items
were publicly noted there would be fewer of them.
You've been doing for long and it seems you're the one who's ignored.
Perhaps you should ignore them.
No.
Of course, the god flakes are going to continue to spam no matter what
anyone says.
And the normal people will continue to have something to say in
return.
Yes. Otherwise someone might think they have a valid point.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
14 Sep 2005 08:00:29 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:16:10 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:29:16 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<dpufi1di20h8cjv36f0smucafnc19ifkfk@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:07:15 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:35:05 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<vdvei1p69mif0d5l1gg3pus3d6517blkdf@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:09 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
That's what alt.abortion is, at present.
True, and oil certainly has nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does your off topic "off topics," but who's complaining?
Several people.
Well, Chilton, for example, will (rightfully) claim when the off-topic
swill contains gross disinformation or it's potentially emotionally
harmful to a disctinct readership.
:-)
Oil has absolutely nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does Heishman's *****, but since he's slinging it, why not
call him on it?
Alt newsgroups are usually trash heaps for off-topic junk.
Which is no reason for ignoring it. Perhaps if such off topic items
were publicly noted there would be fewer of them.
You've been doing for long and it seems you're the one who's ignored.
Perhaps you should ignore them.
No.
It's a suggestion.
Of course, the god flakes are going to continue to spam no matter what
anyone says.
And the normal people will continue to have something to say in
return.
Yes. Otherwise someone might think they have a valid point.
The normal people do have valid points and they will always be there
when the off-topic swill is presented.
What George has presented, however, doesn't constitute that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
14 Sep 2005 05:11:56 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:00:29 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<4j7gi1lcugnornopfr23ntkmcu659qjenj@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:16:10 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:29:16 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<dpufi1di20h8cjv36f0smucafnc19ifkfk@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:07:15 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:35:05 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<vdvei1p69mif0d5l1gg3pus3d6517blkdf@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:09 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
That's what alt.abortion is, at present.
True, and oil certainly has nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does your off topic "off topics," but who's complaining?
Several people.
Well, Chilton, for example, will (rightfully) claim when the off-topic
swill contains gross disinformation or it's potentially emotionally
harmful to a disctinct readership.
I simply point out it is out of place here.
:-)
Oil has absolutely nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does Heishman's *****, but since he's slinging it, why not
call him on it?
Alt newsgroups are usually trash heaps for off-topic junk.
Which is no reason for ignoring it. Perhaps if such off topic items
were publicly noted there would be fewer of them.
You've been doing for long and it seems you're the one who's ignored.
Perhaps you should ignore them.
No.
It's a suggestion.
Of course, the god flakes are going to continue to spam no matter what
anyone says.
And the normal people will continue to have something to say in
return.
Yes. Otherwise someone might think they have a valid point.
The normal people do have valid points and they will always be there
when the off-topic swill is presented.
What George has presented, however, doesn't constitute that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
14 Sep 2005 05:21:08 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:11:56 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:00:29 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<4j7gi1lcugnornopfr23ntkmcu659qjenj@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:16:10 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:29:16 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<dpufi1di20h8cjv36f0smucafnc19ifkfk@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:07:15 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:35:05 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<vdvei1p69mif0d5l1gg3pus3d6517blkdf@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:09 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
That's what alt.abortion is, at present.
True, and oil certainly has nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does your off topic "off topics," but who's complaining?
Several people.
Well, Chilton, for example, will (rightfully) claim when the off-topic
swill contains gross disinformation or it's potentially emotionally
harmful to a disctinct readership.
I simply point out it is out of place here.
But it doesn't do any good considering almost everything posted in
here is off-topic and will always be off-topic until the next recycled
abortion issue returns to the news and there will be scores of posts
to discuss that until it dies out.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
15 Sep 2005 07:38:17 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:21:08 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<1f8hi1dob8nr4tof3ccevoaf063vnpkcc7@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:11:56 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:00:29 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<4j7gi1lcugnornopfr23ntkmcu659qjenj@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:16:10 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:29:16 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<dpufi1di20h8cjv36f0smucafnc19ifkfk@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:07:15 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:35:05 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<vdvei1p69mif0d5l1gg3pus3d6517blkdf@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:09 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
That's what alt.abortion is, at present.
True, and oil certainly has nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does your off topic "off topics," but who's complaining?
Several people.
Well, Chilton, for example, will (rightfully) claim when the off-topic
swill contains gross disinformation or it's potentially emotionally
harmful to a disctinct readership.
I simply point out it is out of place here.
But it doesn't do any good considering almost everything posted in
here is off-topic and will always be off-topic until the next recycled
abortion issue returns to the news and there will be scores of posts
to discuss that until it dies out.
But I can still denounce it. I never said I expected many to pay any
attention. In fact, the most flagrant violators will continue no
matter what since their egos tell them that the world just hangs on to
their every word.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Over Hospitals |
15 Sep 2005 08:16:06 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:38:17 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:21:08 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<1f8hi1dob8nr4tof3ccevoaf063vnpkcc7@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:11:56 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:00:29 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<4j7gi1lcugnornopfr23ntkmcu659qjenj@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:16:10 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:29:16 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<dpufi1di20h8cjv36f0smucafnc19ifkfk@4ax.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:07:15 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:35:05 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<vdvei1p69mif0d5l1gg3pus3d6517blkdf@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:09 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:21:52 -0400, Louise Mallard
<louisemallard@journalist.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<k7rei156fdkbbu5sj4ops7k59d7qvj0346@4ax.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:19 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091313481916807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
On 2005-09-13 12:20:33 -0700, Attila <prochoice@here.now> said:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:04:24 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> in
alt.abortion with message-id <2005091309042416807%ggains@waddfredu>
wrote:
Off topic
You'd rather remain ignorant.
Exactly what does this have to do with abortion?
What does almost every topic posted of late have to do with abortion,
Attila? Off topic, indeed--but it's relevant to every other off-topic
issues that's discussed here.
Then why bother to have newsgroups established for a particular
subject? Why not have just one big group where everything is dumped
in together?
That's what alt.abortion is, at present.
True, and oil certainly has nothing to do with abortion.
Neither does your off topic "off topics," but who's complaining?
Several people.
Well, Chilton, for example, will (rightfully) claim when the off-topic
swill contains gross disinformation or it's potentially emotionally
harmful to a disctinct readership.
I simply point out it is out of place here.
But it doesn't do any good considering almost everything posted in
here is off-topic and will always be off-topic until the next recycled
abortion issue returns to the news and there will be scores of posts
to discuss that until it dies out.
But I can still denounce it.
I never said you couldn't or demanded you shouldn't.
I did suggest, however, that doing so is a futile effort. You seem
knowlegable where it comes to the abortion issue and other political
issues though I don't agree with most of what you say--but you seem to
spend time "off-topic"ing other people who otherwise don't have any
respect for it, know what I mean? (Unless you use it as a means to
annoy certain adversaries, then it may not be a wasted effort.)
I never said I expected many to pay any
attention. In fact, the most flagrant violators will continue no
matter what since their egos tell them that the world just hangs on to
their every word.
I concur, 1005.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
