On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:45:16 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig chilton <

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

"Osprey" wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Well, I guess for once I can actually say liberals got one on me.

President Bush lied

He said he was going to be on his ranch this Thanksgiving.

IMPEACH THE *****!!!!!!!
:))

ROFL

What Bush done yesterday stunned people all over. Do you
know what had to be involved for him to do what he done?

So what?

Thousands upon thousands of the men and women had to leave their
families behind and sacrifice themselves upon his orders. What makes
him more special than those soldiers?

Don't you know? He was APPOINTED.

That makes him worse then the average anti-choice keister.

Helen Thomas -- the journalist who sits near the front at every
Presidential news conference (even Bush's contrived ones), and
has known more Presidents close-up than almost anyone else alive
today, has his number precisely. She publicly called Bush Lite the
WORST American President in history!

-- Craig Chilton

Slate <let_me_know@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<8glfsvgff5390290k458o4ntso42jgjvv9@4ax.com>...

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:57:58 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bq89rc$doo$1@bolt.sonic.net...

Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twofuckspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message

"osprey" <

Well, I guess for once I can actually say liberals got one on me.

President Bush lied

He said he was going to be on his ranch this Thanksgiving.

IMPEACH THE *****!!!!!!!
:))

ROFL

What Bush done yesterday stunned people all over. Do you know what had

to

be involved for him to do what he done?

Put on a flight suit and have an aircraft carrier circle around off of
San Diego?

The troops went NUTS.

Which you know because you were there. Or because a carefully
selected group of friendly reporters were allowed to provide the
propa.., er, "news".

Jealousy gets you nowhere

Osprey Quote:
"Well, I guess for once I can actually say liberals got one on me.
President Bush lied." <end>

Gee, just once? There are pages of them.


Bush LIES....

What he says to American and British veterans at a White House
ceremony:

"Having been here and seeing the care that these troops get is
comforting for me and Laura. We are -- should and must provide the
best care for anybody who is willing to put their life in harm's way."
Bush, 1/17/03

What he does for veterans:

Bush's visit came on the same day that the Administration announced it
is immediately cutting off access to its health care system to
approximately 164,000 veterans. [W. Post, 1/17/03].

Except those cuts didn't happen.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What he says on border security:


"We're working hard to make sure your job is easier, that the port is
safer. The Customs Service is working with overseas ports and shippers
to improve its knowledge of container shipments, assessing risk so
that we have a better feel of who we ought to look at, what we ought
to worry about." Bush, 6/24/02]

What he does:

The President?s 2003 and 2004 budget provides zero for port security
grants. The GOP Congress has provided only $250 million for port
security grants (35% less than authorized). Additionally, in August,
the President vetoed all $39 million for the Container Security
Initiative which he specifically touted. <end>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What he says on fiscal responsibility:

"One of the ways we've got to make sure that we keep our economy
strong is to be wise about how we spend our money. If you overspend,
it creates a fundamental weakness in the foundation of economic
growth. And so I'm working with Congress to make sure they hear the
message -- the message of fiscal responsibility." Bush, 9/16/02


What he does:

Less than 6 months after this pronouncement, Bush proposed a budget
that would put the government more than $300 billion into deficit. As
National Journal noted on 2/12/02, Bush?s own 2004 budget tables show
that WITHOUT Bush?s tax and budgetary proposals, the deficit would
decline after 2006, but WITH Bush?s proposals, the deficit would grow
indefinitely.

It wouldn't matter if Bush was president, or any other republican.
Liberals are going to cry about deficit. Ignoring that many Democrat
presidents also increased our deficit prior to Reagan.

Fact is: Most Americans could care less about the deficit.

Right now the economy is stronger, recovering, stock market is doing
much better, jobless rates at a 3 year low, GDP at a 30 year high.
I am not going to say Bush is perfect. And I can't explain all his
actions. I plan on voting for him again, as I am sure most Americans
will.

Unless someone better comes along. If you don't like Bush,
fine. I really don't care. But don't pretend to be fair minded, when
you are not. You, like most liberals, would vote for the party, not
the person.

Since you are so willing to come forth and want to bash Bush, you need
to look no further than one of the liberal icon's Bill Clinton. Shall
we compare?

Yes, I think we shall.

Don't snip and run now.

BILL CLINTON'S KNOWN LIES



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1991: Question: "Have you ever used Marijuana or any illegal
drugs?" Answer: "I've never broken any drug law." - Arkansas Gazette,
July 24th, 1991, p. 8B
Asked this 3 times, on 3 separate occasions, by 3 different
interviewers, your Great White Hope repeated this claim. Until faced
with irrefutable proof, that is.

Then he said:

March 29th, 1992: "I've never broken a state law. But when I was in
England I experimented with marijuana a time or two..."

Later, in that same interview, "No one has ever asked me that question
point-blank."

- The New York Times, March 30th, 1992, p.A15.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Jan. 19, 1992 Bill Clinton said, "I want to make it very clear that
this middle-class tax cut, in my view, is central to any attempt we're
going to make to have a short-term economic strategy."

But on Jan. 14, 1993 at a press conference, Bill Clinton said, "From
New Hampshire forward, for reasons that absolutely mystified me, the
press thought the most important issue in the race was the
middle-class tax cut. "I never did meet any voter who thought that."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sept. 8,1992, Bill Clinton said, "The only people who will pay more
income taxes are the wealthiest 2 percent, those living in households
making over $200,000 a year."

In response to a Bush-Quayle ad that people with incomes of as little
as $36,000 would pay more taxes under the Clinton plan, Bill Clinton
said on Oct. 1, 1992, "It's a disgrace to the American people that the
president (Bush) of the United States would make a claim that is so
baseless, that is so without foundation, so shameless in its attempt
to get votes under false pretenses."

Yet the NY TIMES in the analysis of Clinton's budget wrote, "There are
tax increases for every family making more than $20,000 a year!"

"While Clinton continued to defend his middle-class tax cut publicly,
he privately expressed the view to his advisers that it was
intellectually dishonest." (The Agenda, by Bob Woodward, p. 31)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Business Week, July 6, 1992, Bill Clinton was quoted as saying,
"When I began the campaign, the projected deficit was $250 billion.
Now its up to $400 billion."

However in Time Magazine. 2 weeks later, Bill Clinton was quoted as
saying, "When I started in New Hampshire working with those numbers,
we felt the deficit was going to be around $250 billion a year, not
$400 billion." Which is it, Bill?

But then he said on Feb. 10, 1993, "The deficit of this country is
about $50 billion a year bigger than I was told it was going to be
before the election." --our President said this after "discovering"
that the deficit was $290 billion, $110 Billion LESS than he had
claimed in July! Which story are we to believe from our president??


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

President Clinton said on March 23, 1993 at a press conference: "M
economic package will cut $500 billion from the deficit in five
years." Yet the projected deficit in 1998 with Clinton's budget is
$234 billion, the projected deficit in 2001 with Clinton budget is
$401 billion.(These figures come from Bill Clinton's budget document,
"A Vision of Change for America."-Feb. 1993.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Wall Street Journal Opinion-Editorial Page 2/21/95
NUMBERS GAME

It's the season to cut government, or at least to claim to, so we
perked up when we heard President Clinton declare in his State of the
Union address that he had cut (quote) more than 100,000 positions from
the federal bureaucracy in the last two years alone (unquote).

As they say in detective work, interesting - if true. So we decided to
pull out the new federal budget to check. What we discovered is that
Mr. Clinton isn't lying, but he isn't telling the whole truth either.
His speeches need an asterisk.

From 1993 to Fiscal Year 1996, the Clinton Administration will in fact
have cut the federal government by 157,000 full-time positions. But
there's a catch: 131,000 of those positions are civilian Defense jobs.
Those cuts reflect the inevitable post-cold War decline in military
spending, not some brave retrenchment in the overall size of
government.

There's another catch: Of the 26,000 positions to be cut from the
non-Defense side of Leviathan, 9,500 come from the Resolution Trust
Corp. and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Those two banking agencies
grew like Topsy to manage the savings and loan debacle, but are now
cutting back as the bailout ends. The RTC is even supposed to go out
of business this year. The bottom line is that over the course of the
Clinton presidency, the non-Defense, non-S&L part of the government
will cut a measly 16,500 full-time positions out of some 1.2 million.
In essence the domestic government is conducting business as usual.

Mr. Clinton also says he's making the federal establishment (quote)
the smallest it has been since John Kennedy was President (unquote).
But again, excluding Defense, total executive branch employment will
be 1,181,000 in 1996. Back in 1963, when JFK was President, total
non-Defense employment was a mere 861,000. Maybe that should be the
1996 goal for Republican budget- cutters; they could say they got the
idea from the President.

Are you referring to the guy who absolutely, positively guaranteed
that if he was elected governor of Arkansas in 1990 he would serve 4
years? The one who said that a 4% income tax rate on the wealthiest 2%
of the population would raise 165 billion dollars, reduce the deficit,
and allow a middle class tax cut? The one who claimed that the
republicans had killed the Lani Guinier nomination? The one who
claimed that he had decided to make himself available to the draft
after 4 acquaintances were killed in Viet Nam (rather than after his
birthday had been drawn #311 in the draft lottery)? The one who
claimed that "affirmative action "benefits white men?

Are you referring to that Clinton?

No, he said that the new gasoline tax (4 cent per gallon) would go to
a deficit reduction trust fund. No such fund has been established to
date... it is going to the general fund to fund their increased social
programs... check it out... call the government accounting office and
ask... they are stealing your money...

And I give you my word to do it without the blame game of the last
twelve years of Reagan and Bush.

Good, OOPS, that lasted almost a whole day!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The NY Times reported that people earning under $100,000 paid an
additional $3 billion in '94.

But wait, Clinton and the media claimed that only the top 2% were
going to pay more taxes. Was that another lie from the Clinton
administration?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to liberal Democrats, anyone who makes a dollar more than
you is the "rich". On the issue of "taxes on the rich", consider the
following:

Most of the "rich" are smart business men & women... they own and run
their own businesses. In addition, Clinton passed a 1% increase in
corporate income taxes...

If you owned your own business, or if you were the CFO of a
corporation, and your cost of doing business went up, what would you
do ? You'd pass this cost on...

Should they feel the heat, so to speak, they pass the new costs on to
the principle consumers of the goods and services they offer...The
middle-class and poor....So who really is paying Clinton's new taxes ?

As the saying goes. "When the "rich" get a sniffle, the middle-class
catches pneumonia."

The real problem with this attack on the rich is the underlying
assumption that this is a static class of people. Not so.

A great many people start off "poor" and as they move up in the
business world become successful and eventually become what the
Democrats would currently characterize as "rich." Indeed most of the
wealth in this country is in the hands of senior citizens. Many of
these people at one time had no money at all.

So, the attack on the rich is not an attack on some evil group. Its
mostly an attack on people who after much sacrifice and hard work have
finally reached their peak earning years and are trying to enjoy and
pass on the fruits of their labor.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There were many other Clinton proposals that didn't fly (thank you)
which would have further parted people from their capital....Here's a
couple of winners he proposed in 1992....

Imputed rent...You would pay tax on "rent" that you would have
collected FROM YOURSELF...Tax real, only...NO RENTAL INCOME !!!!!

Lower the inheritance threshold...From about $650,000 to around
$200,000. What has been an exclusive tax of the rich, Clinton wanted
to give as a gift to the middle-class...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsweek reports that Clinton and the Democrats will no longer pursue
the rich vs. middle class America class warfare strategy. They realize
that it won't help them politically and, according to Newsweek,
"President Clinton...doesn't really believe in it."

Newsweek noted that they are abandoning it, so apparently, they do not
agree, nor do their sources. Clinton has been bashing the rich since
his campaign, claiming disingenuously that they are not paying their
"fair share" of taxes, i.e. falsely implying that they are paying less
than they did in '80. Hillary went after the "greedy" pharmaceutical
companies, after selling their stock short. They have made many
self-serving moralistic statements about the "greed" of the '80's.
Clinton and the Democrats condemn Republican. tax cut plans because
they claim it will "help the rich."

If this is not class warfare, what is?

Clinton has pursued this strategy for about 3 years, and now he claims
he **doesn't really believe in it?** Hey, I'll buy that!

Newsweek reported it as "news." How strangely non-judgmental that they
would not question the sincerity of Clinton's claim when his actions
speak otherwise.

Clinton's economic policies ???

1) A massive tax increase

2) "Hope" that interest rates would remain low

3) A few R & D credits for Al Gore's pet high tech industries

Was there anything else ?

In reference to the Social Security trust fund --

"But its important that we not panic; there is no immediate danger to
retirement. Our accumulated surpluses would be sufficient to pay the
liabilities to 2029 at current payroll tax rates."

From an interview; published in the May '95 issue of Money magazine.

Hasn't anyone told him that the Social Security trust fund has no
money -- Congress borrowed it all and left IOUs with no plans yet on
how to redeem those IOU's?

Given that Clinton seems so concerned about the hateful rhetoric in:
politics these days, I wonder if he intends to limits such violent:
statements as "taking food from the mouths of children", "war on the
poor", "throwing the elderly out on the streets", and "contract _on_
America, Evil, Extreme, Mean Spirited and on and on and on.

We've given more power to states and localities and to private
citizens. Our proposals would further accelerate those trends. Bill
Clinton, White House press conference, 3/3/95

Fact: Clinton lobbied to defeat the Balance Budget Amendment in the
Senate, so states and localities are prevented from getting the chance
to even debate the amendment. His Administration opposes giving block
rants to the states. He is opposing all Block Grants as well.

We support adding 100,000 new police officers. Bill Clinton, same news
conference.

Fact: There are no "100,000 police officers". Never has been, never
will be. Even liberal columnist DeWayne Wickam concluded in USA Today:
"Many of the 100,00 cops promised in the crime bill will never
materialize". On the day AFTER Clinton signed the bill into law, The
New York Times reported that "some law enforcement analyst said the
Administration has in effect misled local officials by vastly
overstating the number of police officers who can be hired under the
program".

It's called lying where I come from, how about where you came from?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Everyone knows that I have tougher ethic rules than any other
President. Bill Clinton, news conference 3/3/95 defending the ethical
standards of his administration.

Fact: In addition to his own Whitewater troubles and many high-level
resignations, several members of his cabinet are currently facing
probes in their conduct, including four "Special Prosecutors..

The budget which came from the President said,, I've given up; that as
long I am President of the United States there will never be a
balanced budget. That is an astonishing statement. Paul Tsongas, at a
Capitol Hill press conference, 2/7/95.

Clinton said, "Who do these people think they are?" referring to
people who stockpile guns, "No other government in the world would
allow their citizens to do that."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How about this!

Sara Brady was quoted in several papers and magazines at an Hand Gun
Incorporated rally a couple of weeks before the Senate vote saying..."
Our main agenda is to have ALL guns banned. We must use whatever means
possible. It doesn't matter if you have to distort facts or even lie.

"Our task of creating a Socialist America can only succeed when those
who would resist us have been totally disarmed." -- Sarah Brady
(President of Handgun Control, Inc. and wife of James Brady, whom the
Brady Bill was named for and was recently "honored" by Clinton)

Democratic Rep. David Obey said "I think most of us learned some time
ago that if you don't like the president's position on a particular
issue, you simply need to wait a few weeks."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Foreign Policy?

Well, let's see, start with Somalia. It's not the first, but its one
of the best known. In the winter of 1992 George Bush ordered US troops
to guard food shipments in and around the ports. The deployment ended
in March, a resounding success. A couple of months later Clinton got
suckered into sending the Marines back in as 'nation builders'. In the
course of which he deliberately violated Executive Orders of the
Presidency not to engage in deliberate or willful assassination of
foreign political or military leaders; you DO remember the AC130
gunships firing wildly into civilian occupied apartment buildings, in
an effort to murder a Somali warlord and his followers, don't you? I
didn't think so. Long term memory is not a strong suite of the
Clintonestae.

Want a small disaster? At the opening of the Holocaust Memorial, 1993.
A luncheon was served afterwards for the distinguished Jewish guests
and foreign dignitaries. The main entree' was Honey baked Ham.

Bosnia. Bosnia is always good for a laugh. On the campaign trail,
Candidate Clinton said that he was qualified as Commander In Chief of
the Arkansas National Guard to make military decisions. As an example,
he bragged that if he were elected, he would bomb the Serbs. In May of
1993, he sent Warren Christopher to convince the Europeans to allow
him to do just that. Christopher went with the 'strongest message
possible' to urge England, France, and Germany that he was fully
committed to this course. Even as the Secretary of State was waiting
to meet with them in Geneva, Your Great White Hope appeared on the
tube and said that 'bombing the Serbs probably wouldn't be necessary'.
Warren Christopher is not noted for emotional displays: Some have
suggested that he has had the centers in his brain responsible for
emotion surgically removed. After Christopher heard what Fearless
Leader did, he ALMOST cracked a frown. The Europeans went ballistic.
This year Clinton pushed the bombing schtick again to make himself
look tougher than the average weenie and we all know what happened:
The Serbs have basically gone on to conquer Bosnia. In that sad
country you now have Serbian held territory and UN funded and run
Serbian concentration camps disguised as 'safe havens'. The only
reason these haven't been overrun is the Serbs haven't got the vaguest
idea what to do with the refugees huddled in them.

"OH!" you shriek hysterically, "PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS HAVE HAD
FAILURES, TOO! IT'S NOT FAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIRRRRR THAT BILL

CLINTON IS BEING JUDGED SO HARSHLY!!!!" Previous administrations had
more successes than failures. George Bush built an international
coalition to defeat Iraq in the Gulf War - even got the Arabs to talk
to the Israelis afterwards. Ronald Reagan stopped the advance of
Marxism in this hemisphere and cracked the will of the Soviets
hard-liners to continue the Cold War. Carter, whatever else he may
have failed at, can always look back at the Camp David Accords. Ford
wasn't President long enough to do more than handle domestic problems,
but Nixon reopened the dialogue with China. And so on back through
American history. Yes, they had failures, but never were so many
failures in so short a time the result of INCREDIBLE INCOMPETENCE by
an Administration.

Dan Rather responding to congratulations to him and Connie Chung
during and interview shortly after they teamed up together, "If we
could be one-hundredth as gret as you and Hillary Rodham Clinton have
been together in the White House," the supposedly objective newsman
said, "we'd take it right now and walk away winners."

"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of
ordinary Americans"

- President Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vice President Al Gore's interview on ABC's "This Week with David
Brinkley," Sunday, August 25, 1996

Vice President Al Gore made a number of assertions during this
interview which we feel require additional clarification.

Medicare

"Beyond that, the Republican Party, specifically Speaker Gingrich,
said that he wanted to make changes that would cause Medicare to
wither on the vine." --Al Gore, ABC's "This Week with David Brinkley,"
8/25/96

Wrong! Al Gore quoted Speaker Gingrich out of context. What the
Speaker actually said was:

"Okay, what do you think the Health Care Financing Administration is?
It's a centralized command bureaucracy. It's everything we're telling
Boris Yeltzin to get rid of. Now we don't get rid of it in round one
because we don't think that's politically smart. We don't think that's
the right way to go through a transition. But we believe its going to
wither on the vine because we think people are voluntarily going to
leave it -- voluntarily." --Speaker Newt Gingrich, remarks to Blue
Cross/Blue Shield conference, 10/24/95

In their 1992 campaign, Clinton and Gore endorsed scrapping the Health
Care Financing Administration:

"We will scrap the Health Care Financing Administration and replace it
with a health standards board -- made up of consumers, providers,
business, labor and government -- that will establish annual health
budget targets and outline a core benefits package." --Bill Clinton
and Al Gore, Putting People First, 1992


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

100,000 Cops

"The president has formed an alliance with the law enforcement
officers around this country and experts in fighting crime, passed
legislation, over the opposition of Senator Dole and Speaker Gingrich,
that is now putting 100,000 extra community police officers on the
streets." --Al Gore, ABC's "This Week with David Brinkley," 8/25/96

Wrong again!

"What I am advised is that there are 17,000 officers that can be
identified as being on the streets." --Attorney General Janet Reno,
media availability, 5/16/96

Worse, not all of these cops are fighting crime:

"At least $7.2 million in COPS grants has been used to hire 86
officers for state parks, marinas and other areas seemingly far
removed from violent crime." --Investor's Business Daily, 7/16/96

Reducing government

"We have downsized the federal government during the last four years
by 250,000 people." --Al Gore, ABC's "This Week with David Brinkley,"
8/25/96

What Gore didn't say was that Clinton accomplished this by gutting
Defense:

"President Clinton's plan three years ago to 'reinvent' government and
cut the federal work force by nearly 252,000 jobs never mentioned that
the military would absorb 75 percent of the cuts." --The Washington
Times, 8/23/96


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The national debt

"The debt, which was just ballooning out of control under the previous
two administrations, has now been cut by 60 percent." --Al Gore, ABC's
"This Week with David Brinkley," 8/25/96

Wrong! According to statistics released in February, 1996 by Clinton's
own Office of Management and Budget, the gross federal debt for fiscal
year 1992 was $4.002 trillion. By fiscal year 1995 it had "ballooned"
to $4.921 trillion -- an increase of 23 percent.

Bill Clinton during a visit in Italy, to his hosts: "Just think, we
are walking on the very ground where Romulus and Remus walked".

-- Bill Clinton (They are fictional characters)

"There is a feeling among reporters that the truth and Clinton don't
often go together. Reporters have a feeling he is a man without
conviction." -- Ken Auletta, a media columnist for the New Yorker



"Clinton's an unusually good liar. Unusually good. Do you realize
that?" Bob Kerrey [D-Neb.], Esquire, 1/96) Senator and Chairman of
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SOMALIA, 1993:

Clinton pledged never to deploy American troops overseas unless U.S.
strategic interests were threatened and there was a clear military
goal with a firm exit strategy.

BOSNIA, 1995

Clinton said he would deploy troops to Bosnia for only 18 months, and
then they would come home.

BOSNIA, 1998

The Clinton administration confirmed plans to maintain thousands of
troops on an open-ended peacekeeping mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina
with no exit strategy."The policy is to remain there. It's
open-ended."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENNIFER FLOWERS, 1992

Clinton emphatically denied having affair with Gennifer Flowers

GENNIFER FLOWERS, 1998

Clinton admits in deposition to having sexual affair with Gennifer
Flowers


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

100 DAY PLAN: June 23, 1992

Bill Clinton: "I intend to have a legislative program ready on the
desks of Congress on the day after I'm inaugurated. I intend to have
an explosive 100 day action period. Why do I think it will pass? Well,
first of all, I'm running on it."

100 DAY PLAN: Jan 14, 1993

Question from member of press: "We were originally led to believe you
would have an outline for congress even before the inauguration and
presented on day one or shortly thereafter - and now we're told it may
be a couple weeks down the road with a full plan ready in March. When
will it be ready?"

Reply by Bill Clinton: "Well, I don't know who led you to believe
that, but I'm the Only one who's authorized to talk about that ---"


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Black Church Burnings

Bill Clinton, June 8 1996: "I have vivid and painful memories of black
churches being burned in my own state when I was a child."

THE TRUTH: NOT A SINGLE BLACK CHURCH BURNED IN ARKANSAS WHEN HE WAS
GROWING UP.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Iowa Caucuses

Bill Clinton, Feb 12, 1996: "Since I was a little boy, I've heard
about the Iowa caucuses. That's why I would really like to do well in
them."

THE TRUTH: THE IOWA