"Bud D. Green" <none@given.net> wrote in message
news:h076g29bvdp6r8bo6b741lqc5uj63fqosd@4ax.com...

On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:59:31 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:

"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:ofo1g2tc73d6ula2ohb43lurln8f590t88@4ax.com...

Yep, that vaunted Christian moral superiority :-)

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/nearwest/chi-0609070284sep07,1,2355846.story?coll=chi-newslocalnearwest-hed

The mother of a Naperville teen killed in a 2001 car crash stormed
from a DuPage courtroom Wednesday after a judge sentenced Sean McNees,
the intoxicated driver, to 6 years in prison.

Why did she storm out of court?
Do you think they should've put her in jail for contempt?
Or did she storm out 'peacefully'?
Is she a member of MADD?
Looks like it, huh?

Why the distraction, Johnny? Why focus on the victims' mother?

The defendant made the choice to abuse drugs and alcohol while
driving.

Does this mean that the absence of an report concerning the 'victim's' BAC
and possible drug content in her bloodstream is something that you expect
onlookers to ignore as you lobby for imprisonment for someone who quite
possibly was not doing anything more than the victim than driving the
automobile?

What part of choosing to drink alcohol and take drugs while driving do
you not understand?

None.
What part of ignorance and being so mad and ignoring the possible drug and
alcohol usage of the 'victim' is so hard for you to understand?
What part of consent to travel with someone who a person knowingly agrees to
travel with during their alcohol and drug usage did you forget about?

I guess MADD has a lot of people seeking vengeance against persons who had
accidents.

Driving a vehicle while drunk is a crime.

A crime? How so if there is no damage done?

The reason it's a crime
should be obvious to any sane person.

How is that when traffic fatalities that involve no alcohol usage exceed
those that do involve alcohol?

The "accident" could have been avoided by the defendant.

The accident could've been avoided by the victim, actually.
She had the autnomyh to refuse to travel with this driver.

Negligence.

On the parent's part to prevent her daughter from travelling with the
driver?

I wonder how many more MADD abortion sluts who are driving the streets
drunk
will escape prosecution for DUI related offenses?
And, how old was the driver?
Was this ladies daughter kidnapped or was she with the diver willingly or
were there two separate cars involved?

Why don't you read the story first, then reply?

I read it.
I see such incompleteness in the investigation that I am hesistant to
attribute any blame to the driver in this case.

Being with the driver willingly is not a factor in this criminal
trial.

Because you are ignorant like the other ignorant people who only want
vengeance even if they or their child was participating in the same
actitivies as the person they are so MADD at.
How about that pro-choice MADD ***** vengeance ***** now?

There was no mention of kidnapping.

Good.
So, the 'victim' was a willing participant in the activities, right?

And, Yangboy.
Where is that Christian superiority in this story?

"It's God's will," McNees said while gazing at his parents in the
front row of the Wheaton courtroom.

You will take his word at that?
You are ridiculously aganst people who intended no harm.

How do you know it is God's will to send a young man to jail for six years
in this case?
Why do you agree with this "It's God's will" all of a sudden.
I don't see you agreeing with God's will in other issues.

In testimony Wednesday, Linda McNees praised her son's participation
in Alcoholics Anonymous and Bible study groups. But Bakalis said that
did not factor into his decision.

"Just about everyone I sentence finds religion," he said. "I stopped
trying to determine that effect on them. Only they know that."

The defendant claims it was gods will.

Yet he refused to make a proper choice when operating a motor vehicle.

Was that proper choice to deny the passenger her desire to give him a
***** while he was driving and they had smoked pot and drank together?

He could have abstained from all substances,

What a ludicrous accusation to make.
The passenger coulda abstained from all substances, but where is the mention
of such, you vinditive anti-libery loon?

since he was driving.

Coulda, woulda, shoulda.
Big deal.

He could have found a volunteer to be the driver,

Why didn't the victim volunteer to drive then?

or otherwise arranged
to stay at one location to drink and take drugs.

At your home?

The choice was his, he made it and it resulted in someones death that
didn't have to happen.

Where do you see any mention of your speculation?

And he blames it on his imaginary god friend.

What God friend?
He meant the sentence was God's will.
Are you so without understanding to understand what he meant when he told
his parents what he told them?
He was trying to comfort them.

And you defend him.

From vindictive abortion ***** MADD women in the USA.
Any day, peon, any day.

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:45010033$0$34555$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...

John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:

I read more of the article. It makes more sense now. Looked like a case
where the defendant wasn't able to rehabilitate himself successfully.
"McNees was 16 when he smashed his car into a tree, killing passenger
Stacey
Blundell. He had been drinking and smoking marijuana, authorities said."
So, you see, it was much as I expected. They were both in the car
together;,
but the story does neglect to say if Stacey was drinking and smoking
marijuana herself.
Look at it this way.
What if she was and was doing the driving?

What if YOU were drunk and driving?

Had there been no accident, no ***** 'mommy dearest'.
Had there been an accident, no willful or unintentional homocide.
I don't kill my dates. do you, abortion fool?

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:45010033$0$34555$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...

John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:

I read more of the article. It makes more sense now. Looked like a case
where the defendant wasn't able to rehabilitate himself successfully.
"McNees was 16 when he smashed his car into a tree, killing passenger
Stacey
Blundell. He had been drinking and smoking marijuana, authorities said."
So, you see, it was much as I expected. They were both in the car
together;,
but the story does neglect to say if Stacey was drinking and smoking
marijuana herself.
Look at it this way.
What if she was and was doing the driving?

What if YOU were drunk and driving?

Had there been no accident, no ***** 'mommy dearest'.
Had there been an accident, no willful or unintentional homocide.

I don't kill my dates.