| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
28 Dec 2005 10:03:11 AM |
| Object: |
One for the ladies |
For some reason, certain people have misinterpreted my commentary as being
anti-woman. The following article will only prove that I do have women's
best interest at heart.
http://news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=2464392005
Scientists to say if your bum really does look big
IT is one of the greatest female dilemmas and has led generations of women
to ask: "Does my bum look big in this?"
Now, a team of researchers from Edinburgh's Heriot-Watt University are
launching what is believed to be the world's first scientific study to
answer the often asked question of how clothing can affect the appearance of
the female rear.
The team, from the university's School of Textiles and Design, based in
Galashiels, believe the study could have major implications for retailers.
Female volunteers wearing hundreds of different types of clothing will have
their behinds photographed for the research.
Participants will then be asked to look at the pictures to assess how big or
small each model's backside appears. The study will examine how various
designs, colours, patterns and fabric types affect perception of bottom
size.
Dr Lisa Macintyre, who is leading the research, said four models had been
chosen to provide as representative as possible a sample of female rears.
One has a "standard" womanly backside while another has a much fuller
"pre-Raphaelite" bum, like television presenter Liza Tarbuck's.
The academic said the third model was slim with a small bum while another
had a curvier behind like actress and singer Jennifer Lopez.
Dr Macintyre, 33, from Edinburgh, said: "There's much discussion in the
media of clothing styles that flatter the body and it's generally accepted
that enhancing body perception can improve confidence and self-esteem.
"But the factors behind this have never been fully investigated in a proper
scientific manner."
begin 666 page2.asp&block=0&capping=0&session_capping=0&cb=99e7c91c23
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`( ``/___P```"'Y! ``````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``
`
end
.
|
|
| User: "Frank Arthur" |
|
| Title: Re: One for the ladies |
28 Dec 2005 10:07:16 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:14KdnUiIC7mpKi_enZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
For some reason, certain people have misinterpreted my commentary as being
anti-woman.
Not so. You are also anti-men. You are a religious freak who would like to
own and control all human beings.
Control,coerce,force and demand all bow before your imaginary Allah!
The following article will only prove that I do have women's
best interest at heart.
http://news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=2464392005
Scientists to say if your bum really does look big
IT is one of the greatest female dilemmas and has led generations of women
to ask: "Does my bum look big in this?"
Now, a team of researchers from Edinburgh's Heriot-Watt University are
launching what is believed to be the world's first scientific study to
answer the often asked question of how clothing can affect the appearance
of
the female rear.
The team, from the university's School of Textiles and Design, based in
Galashiels, believe the study could have major implications for retailers.
Female volunteers wearing hundreds of different types of clothing will
have
their behinds photographed for the research.
Participants will then be asked to look at the pictures to assess how big
or
small each model's backside appears. The study will examine how various
designs, colours, patterns and fabric types affect perception of bottom
size.
Dr Lisa Macintyre, who is leading the research, said four models had been
chosen to provide as representative as possible a sample of female rears.
One has a "standard" womanly backside while another has a much fuller
"pre-Raphaelite" bum, like television presenter Liza Tarbuck's.
The academic said the third model was slim with a small bum while another
had a curvier behind like actress and singer Jennifer Lopez.
Dr Macintyre, 33, from Edinburgh, said: "There's much discussion in the
media of clothing styles that flatter the body and it's generally accepted
that enhancing body perception can improve confidence and self-esteem.
"But the factors behind this have never been fully investigated in a
proper
scientific manner."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: One for the ladies |
28 Dec 2005 11:07:27 AM |
|
|
Frank Arthur wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:14KdnUiIC7mpKi_enZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
For some reason, certain people have misinterpreted my commentary as being
anti-woman.
Not so. You are also anti-men. You are a religious freak who would like to
own and control all human beings.
Control,coerce,force and demand all bow before your imaginary Allah!
Well you've certainly got JIben's number! :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: One for the ladies |
28 Dec 2005 10:28:12 AM |
|
|
Bigot and certified loon "J Young" <> wrote in message
news:14KdnUiIC7mpKi_enZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
For some reason, certain people have misinterpreted my commentary as being
anti-woman.
"At the risk of tarnishing my reputation as an egalitarian, I state
unequivocally; women are an absolute terror on the road and should be
banned from driving in metropolitan areas. Not one day ever passes
without some woman doing something to disrupt the flow of traffic.
They are the cause of numerous fender-benders. Parking on a public
street is pure entertainment for a heckler. Parking lots are an
absolute disaster. Now I know as well as anyone that there are some
women who drive as well as a man. The problem is the majority of women
cannot handle driving inside city limits, and should be confined to
driving in rural and suburban areas."
From: (J Young)
Newsgroups: houston.general,tx.genPublic transportation is always a
viable, reliable option for the ladies to get about town."
eral,alt.abortion,soc.men,alt.feminism
Subject: Women drivers
Date: 19 Sep 2004 21:26:09 -0700
Message-ID: <9c2d0f9a.0409192026.24f0cc96@posting.google.com>
The following article will only prove that I do have women's best interest
at heart.
Uh huh:
"The ugliest, sorriest,women I know of; and would never even think of
impregnating, belong to N(ot)O(ne)W(inner)."
"the only use a muslim girl has; Take a nice splash of sperm in the face."
From: (Jon Young)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.islam
Subject: Re: Do you read and write Englisg like me?
Date: 14 Feb 2004 20:31:14 -0800
Message-ID: <25e1e54f.0402142031.169cd06c@posting.google.com>
So...not getting much, lil "J"? <answer is obvious>
LC~ Leave it to "J" to open his mouth and quickly insert feet, among other
appendages.
"anal stimulation with a ***** helps enhance the spanking experience."
From: (Jon Young), one sick loon.
Newsgroups: soc.sexuality.spanking
Subject: best done with help
Date: 5 Oct 2003 18:00:43 -0700
Message-ID: <567f3dc3.0310051700.31b4eb95@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: One for the ladies |
28 Dec 2005 10:32:44 AM |
|
|
Don't worry, J Young, no one here is misinterpreting you: you're one
big moron...
Man, must you hate yourself to be such a repulsive individual...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: One for the ladies |
28 Dec 2005 11:47:23 AM |
|
|
Parsifal wrote:
Don't worry, J Young, no one here is misinterpreting you: you're one
big moron...
Man, must you hate yourself to be such a repulsive individual...
as are you, sock puppet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: One for the ladies |
28 Dec 2005 04:25:03 PM |
|
|
*Parsifal wrote:
*> Don't worry, J Young, no one here is misinterpreting you: you're one
*> big moron...
*> Man, must you hate yourself to be such a repulsive individual...
*as are you, sock puppet.
Oh, I see: you too approve of J Young usual racist, bigoted, intolerant
and now, sexist, postings... Well, don't worry: you're a moron, too!
Now... happy?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: One for the ladies |
28 Dec 2005 12:59:56 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
For some reason, certain people have misinterpreted my commentary as being
anti-woman.
Because you are anti-woman.
The following article will only prove that I do have women's
best interest at heart.
In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord.
Adolph Hitler
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: One for the ladies |
28 Dec 2005 01:55:49 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
For some reason, certain people have misinterpreted my commentary as being
anti-woman. The following article will only prove that I do have women's
best interest at heart.
LOL, you're so full of ***** and you know it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: One for the ladies |
28 Dec 2005 11:22:30 AM |
|
|
This is legalized intellectual pornography.
How can I apply to be one of the judges?
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:14KdnUiIC7mpKi_enZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
For some reason, certain people have misinterpreted my commentary as being
anti-woman. The following article will only prove that I do have women's
best interest at heart.
http://news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=2464392005
Scientists to say if your bum really does look big
IT is one of the greatest female dilemmas and has led generations of women
to ask: "Does my bum look big in this?"
Now, a team of researchers from Edinburgh's Heriot-Watt University are
launching what is believed to be the world's first scientific study to
answer the often asked question of how clothing can affect the appearance
of
the female rear.
The team, from the university's School of Textiles and Design, based in
Galashiels, believe the study could have major implications for retailers.
Female volunteers wearing hundreds of different types of clothing will
have
their behinds photographed for the research.
Participants will then be asked to look at the pictures to assess how big
or
small each model's backside appears. The study will examine how various
designs, colours, patterns and fabric types affect perception of bottom
size.
Dr Lisa Macintyre, who is leading the research, said four models had been
chosen to provide as representative as possible a sample of female rears.
One has a "standard" womanly backside while another has a much fuller
"pre-Raphaelite" bum, like television presenter Liza Tarbuck's.
The academic said the third model was slim with a small bum while another
had a curvier behind like actress and singer Jennifer Lopez.
Dr Macintyre, 33, from Edinburgh, said: "There's much discussion in the
media of clothing styles that flatter the body and it's generally accepted
that enhancing body perception can improve confidence and self-esteem.
"But the factors behind this have never been fully investigated in a
proper
scientific manner."
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
