One More Republican Bites The Dust!



 Science > Abortion > One More Republican Bites The Dust!

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 5

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "George"
Date: 29 Sep 2005 04:05:47 PM
Object: One More Republican Bites The Dust!
The Republicans just keep gtting their hands caught in teh cookie jar.
And Opsrey was claiming that "Not all Republicans are Criminals."
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR2005092001767.html>
.

User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 29 Sep 2005 04:22:38 PM
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005092914054716807%ggains@waddfredu...

The Republicans just keep gtting their hands caught in teh cookie jar.
And Opsrey was claiming that "Not all Republicans are Criminals."


<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR200509200
1767.html>
What they keep trying to say is that he is essentially exhonerated because
it was a blind trust, even going so far in the article to mention that he
had no idea how many shares he had.
But it's *****. All he had to do is get a call from dear, old dad and he
(Frist) gives the order to unload all of it. A 15% drop in value at only
$7million is $1.05 million.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
-Mr. Worf, set phasers on "***** You" and fire at will. -Doc Smartass
.
User: "George"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 29 Sep 2005 04:35:43 PM
On 2005-09-29 14:22:38 -0700, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahoooY.com> said:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005092914054716807%ggains@waddfredu...

The Republicans just keep gtting their hands caught in teh cookie jar.
And Opsrey was claiming that "Not all Republicans are Criminals."


<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR200509200
1767.html>

What they keep trying to say is that he is essentially exhonerated because
it was a blind trust, even going so far in the article to mention that he
had no idea how many shares he had.

But it's *****. All he had to do is get a call from dear, old dad and he
(Frist) gives the order to unload all of it. A 15% drop in value at only
$7million is $1.05 million.

Plus there is now proof that he knew what was in the "Blind Trust."
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050924/ap_on_go_co/frist_stock>
These assholes are a bunch of thieves. This is what happenes when the
American public allows Republicans in office.
Frist is going to jail!
Can DeLay be far behind?
.
User: "George"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 29 Sep 2005 04:40:35 PM
On 2005-09-29 14:35:43 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> said:

On 2005-09-29 14:22:38 -0700, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahoooY.com> said:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005092914054716807%ggains@waddfredu...

The Republicans just keep gtting their hands caught in teh cookie jar.
And Opsrey was claiming that "Not all Republicans are Criminals."


<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR200509200
1767.html>

What they keep trying to say is that he is essentially exhonerated because
it was a blind trust, even going so far in the article to mention that he
had no idea how many shares he had.

But it's *****. All he had to do is get a call from dear, old dad and he
(Frist) gives the order to unload all of it. A 15% drop in value at only
$7million is $1.05 million.


Plus there is now proof that he knew what was in the "Blind Trust."

<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050924/ap_on_go_co/frist_stock>

These assholes are a bunch of thieves. This is what happenes when the
American public allows Republicans in office.

Frist is going to jail!

Can DeLay be far behind?

Here is more on the criminal aspects of this:
<http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/26/frist.blindtrust.ap/index.html>
When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect this.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 30 Sep 2005 12:49:25 AM
George wrote:

On 2005-09-29 14:35:43 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> said:

On 2005-09-29 14:22:38 -0700, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahoooY.com> said:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005092914054716807%ggains@waddfredu...

The Republicans just keep gtting their hands caught in teh cookie jar.
And Opsrey was claiming that "Not all Republicans are Criminals."


<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR200509200
1767.html>

What they keep trying to say is that he is essentially exhonerated because
it was a blind trust, even going so far in the article to mention that he
had no idea how many shares he had.

But it's *****. All he had to do is get a call from dear, old dad and he
(Frist) gives the order to unload all of it. A 15% drop in value at only
$7million is $1.05 million.


Plus there is now proof that he knew what was in the "Blind Trust."

<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050924/ap_on_go_co/frist_stock>

These assholes are a bunch of thieves. This is what happenes when the
American public allows Republicans in office.

Frist is going to jail!

Can DeLay be far behind?


Here is more on the criminal aspects of this:

<http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/26/frist.blindtrust.ap/index.html>

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect this.

Oh and we see the Democrats are full of morals right?
Bill Clinton - adultery
Ted Kennedy
Larry Byrd
Oh puh-lease don't tell me you think that the Democrats are the example
of morals..ROFL
I realize that the Republicans are not the ideal for morals; but lets
be honest about this. Politicians...are Politicians..they lie, cheat,
steal and do what ever it takes to win, and that happens on all sides.
.
User: "LC"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 30 Sep 2005 08:13:03 AM
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1128059364.971936.204000@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Oh and we see the Democrats are full of morals right?
Bill Clinton - adultery
Ted Kennedy
Larry Byrd

I hope Ostrich spends more time proof reading the assignments he submits at
Dover Remedial JuCo than he does here on Usenetland.
Sheesh!
LC~ Heishman's remedial mind obviously can't distinguish Massachussets
Senators and retired Massachussets NBA players.
"The incompetent with nothing to do can still make a mess of it."~ Laurence
J. Peter
.

User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 30 Sep 2005 09:32:45 AM
In article <1128059364.971936.204000@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

George wrote:

On 2005-09-29 14:35:43 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> said:

On 2005-09-29 14:22:38 -0700, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahoooY.com> said:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005092914054716807%ggains@waddfredu...

The Republicans just keep gtting their hands caught in teh cookie jar.
And Opsrey was claiming that "Not all Republicans are Criminals."



<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR200509
200
1767.html>

What they keep trying to say is that he is essentially exhonerated
because
it was a blind trust, even going so far in the article to mention that he
had no idea how many shares he had.

But it's *****. All he had to do is get a call from dear, old dad and
he
(Frist) gives the order to unload all of it. A 15% drop in value at only
$7million is $1.05 million.


Plus there is now proof that he knew what was in the "Blind Trust."

<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050924/ap_on_go_co/frist_stock>

These assholes are a bunch of thieves. This is what happenes when the
American public allows Republicans in office.

Frist is going to jail!

Can DeLay be far behind?


Here is more on the criminal aspects of this:

<http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/26/frist.blindtrust.ap/index.html>

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect
this.


Oh and we see the Democrats are full of morals right?

The Osprey Defense

Bill Clinton - adultery

Not a crime.

Ted Kennedy

Good Senator

Larry Byrd

The Basketball Player? What an idiot.


Oh puh-lease don't tell me you think that the Democrats are the example
of morals..ROFL

Larry Bird is a Republican.


I realize that the Republicans are not the ideal for morals; but lets
be honest about this. Politicians...are Politicians..they lie, cheat,
steal and do what ever it takes to win, and that happens on all sides.

Wrong - but you keep believing that getting a ***** is criminal,
"criminal justice student."
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 30 Sep 2005 02:59:25 PM
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:300920050732455507%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <1128059364.971936.204000@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

George wrote:

On 2005-09-29 14:35:43 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> said:

On 2005-09-29 14:22:38 -0700, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahoooY.com> said:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005092914054716807%ggains@waddfredu...

The Republicans just keep gtting their hands caught in teh cookie
jar.
And Opsrey was claiming that "Not all Republicans are Criminals."



<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR200509
200
1767.html>

What they keep trying to say is that he is essentially exhonerated
because
it was a blind trust, even going so far in the article to mention
that he
had no idea how many shares he had.

But it's *****. All he had to do is get a call from dear, old dad
and
he
(Frist) gives the order to unload all of it. A 15% drop in value at
only
$7million is $1.05 million.


Plus there is now proof that he knew what was in the "Blind Trust."

<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050924/ap_on_go_co/frist_stock>

These assholes are a bunch of thieves. This is what happenes when
the
American public allows Republicans in office.

Frist is going to jail!

Can DeLay be far behind?


Here is more on the criminal aspects of this:

<http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/26/frist.blindtrust.ap/index.html>

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect
this.


Oh and we see the Democrats are full of morals right?


The Osprey Defense

Bill Clinton - adultery


Not a crime.

Morals idiot


Ted Kennedy


Good Senator

ROFL, that is if he isn't drunk or having someone killed.


Larry Byrd


The Basketball Player? What an idiot.


Oh puh-lease don't tell me you think that the Democrats are the example
of morals..ROFL


Larry Bird is a Republican.

Sen. Robert Byrd, Former KKK member. Oh yea, Democratic morals



I realize that the Republicans are not the ideal for morals; but lets
be honest about this. Politicians...are Politicians..they lie, cheat,
steal and do what ever it takes to win, and that happens on all sides.


Wrong - but you keep believing that getting a ***** is criminal,
"criminal justice student."

.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 30 Sep 2005 09:07:19 PM
In article <FdGdnUGW2rABBaDeRVn-pQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:300920050732455507%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <1128059364.971936.204000@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

George wrote:

On 2005-09-29 14:35:43 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> said:

On 2005-09-29 14:22:38 -0700, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahoooY.com> said:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005092914054716807%ggains@waddfredu...

The Republicans just keep gtting their hands caught in teh cookie
jar.
And Opsrey was claiming that "Not all Republicans are Criminals."




<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR200
509
200
1767.html>

What they keep trying to say is that he is essentially exhonerated
because
it was a blind trust, even going so far in the article to mention
that he
had no idea how many shares he had.

But it's *****. All he had to do is get a call from dear, old dad
and
he
(Frist) gives the order to unload all of it. A 15% drop in value at
only
$7million is $1.05 million.


Plus there is now proof that he knew what was in the "Blind Trust."

<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050924/ap_on_go_co/frist_stock>

These assholes are a bunch of thieves. This is what happenes when
the
American public allows Republicans in office.

Frist is going to jail!

Can DeLay be far behind?


Here is more on the criminal aspects of this:

<http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/26/frist.blindtrust.ap/index.html>

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect
this.


Oh and we see the Democrats are full of morals right?


The Osprey Defense

Bill Clinton - adultery


Not a crime.


Morals idiot

Sex is not immoral.



Ted Kennedy


Good Senator


ROFL, that is if he isn't drunk or having someone killed.

Lies



Larry Byrd


The Basketball Player? What an idiot.


Oh puh-lease don't tell me you think that the Democrats are the example
of morals..ROFL


Larry Bird is a Republican.


Sen. Robert Byrd, Former KKK member. Oh yea, Democratic morals

I thought you said "Larry" Byrd?
And try to concentrate on the word "former" you idiot.
Republican "Values" leader, and Republican advisor, William Bennett,
just yesterday:
"If you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole
purpose -- you could abort every black baby in this country and your
crime rate would go down."
.

User: "Louise "

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 30 Sep 2005 03:22:59 PM
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:59:25 -0400, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:


"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:300920050732455507%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <1128059364.971936.204000@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

George wrote:

On 2005-09-29 14:35:43 -0700, George <ggains@waddfr.edu> said:

On 2005-09-29 14:22:38 -0700, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahoooY.com> said:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005092914054716807%ggains@waddfredu...

The Republicans just keep gtting their hands caught in teh cookie
jar.
And Opsrey was claiming that "Not all Republicans are Criminals."



<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/20/AR200509
200
1767.html>

What they keep trying to say is that he is essentially exhonerated
because
it was a blind trust, even going so far in the article to mention
that he
had no idea how many shares he had.

But it's *****. All he had to do is get a call from dear, old dad
and
he
(Frist) gives the order to unload all of it. A 15% drop in value at
only
$7million is $1.05 million.


Plus there is now proof that he knew what was in the "Blind Trust."

<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050924/ap_on_go_co/frist_stock>

These assholes are a bunch of thieves. This is what happenes when
the
American public allows Republicans in office.

Frist is going to jail!

Can DeLay be far behind?


Here is more on the criminal aspects of this:

<http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/26/frist.blindtrust.ap/index.html>

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect
this.


Oh and we see the Democrats are full of morals right?


The Osprey Defense

Bill Clinton - adultery


Not a crime.


Morals idiot

You lie, forge, and cheat. Those are morals?


Ted Kennedy


Good Senator


ROFL, that is if he isn't drunk or having someone killed.

Sorta like speeding Laura Bush, who ran a stop sign and killed her
boyfriend?
.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 01 Oct 2005 12:26:56 AM
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message

Oh and we see the Democrats are full of morals right?


The Osprey Defense

Bill Clinton - adultery


Not a crime.


Morals idiot

You are the last one to be criticising ANYBODY's morals.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.



User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 01 Oct 2005 12:25:49 AM
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Frist is going to jail!

Can DeLay be far behind?


Here is more on the criminal aspects of this:

<http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/26/frist.blindtrust.ap/index.html>

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect this.


Oh and we see the Democrats are full of morals right?

Idiot heishman is always trying to blame somebody else. No morals.
No responsibility.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.


User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 29 Sep 2005 11:16:31 PM
In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect this.

The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one is, the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction on
spending for education by the "Education President," the Republicans
are only getting out the vote!
.
User: "George"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 04 Oct 2005 03:55:13 PM
On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one is, the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction on
spending for education by the "Education President," the Republicans
are only getting out the vote!

Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated that the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 04 Oct 2005 07:12:51 PM
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one is, the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction on
spending for education by the "Education President," the Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated that the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.

But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are good
examples of a rebuttal.
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 04 Oct 2005 08:55:05 PM
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one is, the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction on
spending for education by the "Education President," the Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated that the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are good
examples of a rebuttal.

Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an ignorant
halfwit.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 04 Oct 2005 09:15:30 PM
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one is, the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction on
spending for education by the "Education President," the Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated that the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an ignorant
halfwit.

Thank you for supporting my position.


--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net

.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 04 Oct 2005 09:24:00 PM
In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one is, the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction on
spending for education by the "Education President," the Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated that the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.

Idiot.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 04 Oct 2005 09:33:46 PM
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction on
spending for education by the "Education President," the Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.

And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers and
Democrats?
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 04 Oct 2005 11:33:53 PM
In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction on
spending for education by the "Education President," the Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers and
Democrats?

Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 04 Oct 2005 11:53:14 PM
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020052133522373%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one
is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction
on
spending for education by the "Education President," the
Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated
that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are
good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.

No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 05 Oct 2005 09:22:29 AM
In article <S9-dnRQ8hMMmxt7eRVn-ig@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020052133522373%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated one
is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the reduction
on
spending for education by the "Education President," the
Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated
that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are
good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.

Hey! Look everyone! The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has
now resorted to forging posts!
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 05 Oct 2005 09:53:19 AM
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050722291411%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <S9-dnRQ8hMMmxt7eRVn-ig@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020052133522373%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have
to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated
one
is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the
reduction
on
spending for education by the "Education President," the
Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated
that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are
good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.


Hey! Look everyone!

Yea, look..Barnes likes to "lick asses"
The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has

now resorted to forging posts!

Forging?
Shall we talk about your forging?
osprey wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96DCACB8F6863keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...

Louise <> wrote in news:ba3ej15itmn2ip37auvu9ct38ua61cnnv4@4ax.com:

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:54:08 -0400, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

Oh hell, you are hearing voices again. I truly hoped you had that
worked out.


Remember the

address you wanted us to forget and
said it was strictly for posting purposes? You've used it post your
crank, anti-liberal ***** on other posts using it.



since he has posting using that address, it is a public address open to
email, right?

here is a post he made from that address: http://tinyurl.com/a33br


Let's take a look at this forged posting James is using and take note of
the
many faults.

Path:
controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!peer02.cox.net!cox.net!p01!fed1read06.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: OT Iraq: US losing cherished "credibility", ROTFLMAO
From: Robert Heishman <rheish...@state.de.us>
Newsgroups: alt.support.marriage,alt.support.divorce,misc.survivalism
Message-ID: <300520042333465973%

>
References: <c9eeo3$6ng$0@pita.alt.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Thoth/1.7.0 (Carbon/OS X)
Lines: 9
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 23:33:46 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.111.228.148
X-Complaints-To:

X-Trace: fed1read06 1085985226 68.111.228.148 (Mon, 31 May 2004 02:33:46
EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 02:33:46 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications



A) There is no
mailing address. (mistake number 1
on
your part)
B) The state doesn't use "Cox Communications" (mistake number 2 on your
part)
C) NNTP-Posting Host NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.111.228.148 (mistake number 3
on your part)

If you worthless pieces of ***** are going to lie about me and make this
dumb
***** up, you are going to simply have to do better than that.



So who post from NNTP - Posting Host 68.111.228.148?

Answer:

David Barnes

68.111.228.148
Cox Communications Inc. COX-ATLANTA-2 (NET-68-96-0-0-1)
68.96.0.0 - 68.111.255.255
Cox Communications NETBLK-SD-RDC-68-111-128-0 (NET-68-111-128-0-1)
68.111.128.0 - 68.111.255.255

Get real idiots, you are getting more and more desperate.

Now Barnes is trying to post using my name and a fictitious e-mail
address...and on top of it, using the state of Delaware IN his forgery.

Now, there will be those who will say "prove it is Barnes"
O.k., here is a post from Barnes around that time period. Take special
note on the NNTP-Posting Host and see if it looks familiar.
Oh, and No One, I hope you are paying close attention to this. This is
how stupid these idiots can get and you remember Barnes...your new
buddy. Just remember this is how low he will get.
Anyway, here is the post with the header.
Path:
controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!p01!fed1read07.POSTED!VoteKerry
Subject: Re: "Morning After" Pill nixed.
From: "David W. Barnes" <VoteKe...@dbarnes.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.abortion,soc.culture.usa,talk.abortion,alt.bible,alt.politics.usa.republican
Message-ID: <100520041917496925%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com>
References: <bLXmc.1197$BJ6.108578@attbi_s51>
<20040507234937.11380.00001152@mb-m18.aol.com>
<409cfb08.111480316@netnews.mchsi.com>
<w7gnc.7963$536.1615336@attbi_s03>
<080520041851522782%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com>
<u_6dnV1XK5HrCgDdRVn-hA@heartoftn.net>
<080520041950424583%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com>
<1e57ec88.0405100954.5adb1440@posting.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Thoth/1.7.0 (Carbon/OS X)
Lines: 27
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 19:17:49 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.111.228.148
X-Complaints-To:

X-Trace: fed1read07 1084241869 68.111.228.148 (Mon, 10 May 2004
22:17:49 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 22:17:49 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Now, let us once again review this and see just how stupid Keegan and
Louise have gotten.
First..
They said I posted from the e-mail address

That was the first mistake, there is no such state e-mail address.
Second..the NTTP Posting Host on the posting Keegan uses is
68.111.228.148
Third..the IP comes from Cox Communications, not the State of Delaware
and Fourth...I supplied a posting from David Barnes during that month
and year, and the NTTP Posting Host is IDENTICAL
68.111.228.148
What's their next pathetic attempt going to be?
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 05 Oct 2005 10:03:39 AM
In article <iZCdnaLtu5g2et7eRVn-hg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050722291411%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <S9-dnRQ8hMMmxt7eRVn-ig@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020052133522373%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you have
to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated
one
is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the
reduction
on
spending for education by the "Education President," the
Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that demonstrated
that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes are
good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.


Hey! Look everyone!


Yea, look..Barnes likes to "lick asses"


The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has

now resorted to forging posts!


Forging?

Yeah. You shameless.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 05 Oct 2005 10:31:11 AM
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050803389607%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <iZCdnaLtu5g2et7eRVn-hg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050722291411%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <S9-dnRQ8hMMmxt7eRVn-ig@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020052133522373%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you
have
to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated
one
is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the
reduction
on
spending for education by the "Education President," the
Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that
demonstrated
that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes
are
good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an
ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.


Hey! Look everyone!


Yea, look..Barnes likes to "lick asses"


The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has

now resorted to forging posts!


Forging?


Yeah. You shameless.

Explain why you posts in other newsgroups, using other peoples names and
ficticious e-mail addresses.
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 05 Oct 2005 10:12:19 PM
In article <nMadnfVX2ohQbd7eRVn-gw@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050803389607%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <iZCdnaLtu5g2et7eRVn-hg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050722291411%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <S9-dnRQ8hMMmxt7eRVn-ig@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020052133522373%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality, you
have
to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less educated
one
is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the
reduction
on
spending for education by the "Education President," the
Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that
demonstrated
that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and Barnes
are
good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an
ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.


Hey! Look everyone!


Yea, look..Barnes likes to "lick asses"


The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has

now resorted to forging posts!


Forging?


Yeah. You shameless.


Explain why you posts in other newsgroups, using other peoples names and
ficticious e-mail addresses.

You said you didn't believe that. Now you do. Getting your ***** kicked
made you change your "mind."
You spoofed it.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 05 Oct 2005 10:38:52 PM
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020052012199923%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <nMadnfVX2ohQbd7eRVn-gw@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050803389607%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <iZCdnaLtu5g2et7eRVn-hg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050722291411%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <S9-dnRQ8hMMmxt7eRVn-ig@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020052133522373%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>,
George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality,
you
have
to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less
educated
one
is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the
reduction
on
spending for education by the "Education President," the
Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that
demonstrated
that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and
Barnes
are
good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an
ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers
and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.


Hey! Look everyone!


Yea, look..Barnes likes to "lick asses"


The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has

now resorted to forging posts!


Forging?


Yeah. You shameless.


Explain why you posts in other newsgroups, using other peoples names and
ficticious e-mail addresses.


You said you didn't believe that. Now you do.

That is correct, after some evaluation I realized you were lying to try and
save your ***** from embarrassment at getting caught.
Why did you posts in the other newsgroups, using my name and a ficticious
e-mail?
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 05 Oct 2005 11:06:56 PM
In article <tfqdne52brC5BtneRVn-qA@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020052012199923%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <nMadnfVX2ohQbd7eRVn-gw@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050803389607%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <iZCdnaLtu5g2et7eRVn-hg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050722291411%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <S9-dnRQ8hMMmxt7eRVn-ig@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020052133522373%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>,
George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality,
you
have
to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less
educated
one
is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with the
reduction
on
spending for education by the "Education President," the
Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that
demonstrated
that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and
Barnes
are
good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an
ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated" pro-choicers
and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.


Hey! Look everyone!


Yea, look..Barnes likes to "lick asses"


The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has

now resorted to forging posts!


Forging?


Yeah. You shameless.


Explain why you posts in other newsgroups, using other peoples names and
ficticious e-mail addresses.


You said you didn't believe that. Now you do.


That is correct, after some evaluation I realized you were lying to try and
save your ***** from embarrassment at getting caught.

You are just the piece of ***** I thought you were. Big deal.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 06 Oct 2005 07:37:21 AM
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020052106562036%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <tfqdne52brC5BtneRVn-qA@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020052012199923%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <nMadnfVX2ohQbd7eRVn-gw@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050803389607%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <iZCdnaLtu5g2et7eRVn-hg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:051020050722291411%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <S9-dnRQ8hMMmxt7eRVn-ig@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020052133522373%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <FeydnReBxZq2pt7eRVn-jg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051924005820%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <armdnW3gIOd6q97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dhvbpp$fa0$1@bolt.sonic.net...

osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005100413551343658%ggains@waddfredu...

On 2005-09-29 21:16:31 -0700, "David W. Barnes"
<dbarnes@aol.com>
said:

In article <2005092914403516807%ggains@waddfredu>,
George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:

When you allow people in office with a low morality,
you
have
to
expect
this.


The Right will do it again. Studies show the less
educated
one
is,
the
more likely they are to be conservative. And with
the
reduction
on
spending for education by the "Education President,"
the
Republicans
are only getting out the vote!


Sadly, that is true. I recently saw a study that
demonstrated
that
the
educated are, generally, pro-choice.


But something's wrong with that claim, because you and
Barnes
are
good
examples of a rebuttal.


Grow up, idiot. Everybody can see that you're just an
ignorant
halfwit.


Thank you for supporting my position.


Idiot.


And thank you too. So where are these "educated"
pro-choicers
and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.


Hey! Look everyone!


Yea, look..Barnes likes to "lick asses"


The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has

now resorted to forging posts!


Forging?


Yeah. You shameless.


Explain why you posts in other newsgroups, using other peoples names
and
ficticious e-mail addresses.


You said you didn't believe that. Now you do.


That is correct, after some evaluation I realized you were lying to try
and
save your ***** from embarrassment at getting caught.


You are just the piece of ***** I thought you were. Big deal.

You call me the piece of *****, and it was YOU...who posted in several other
newsgroups using MY NAME and a ficticious e-mail address.
Oh the irony is priceless.
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 06 Oct 2005 09:55:16 AM
In article <pcydnZI0e9HphNjeRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

And thank you too. So where are these "educated"
pro-choicers
and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you are.


Hey! Look everyone!


Yea, look..Barnes likes to "lick asses"


The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has

now resorted to forging posts!


Forging?


Yeah. You shameless.


Explain why you posts in other newsgroups, using other peoples names
and
ficticious e-mail addresses.


You said you didn't believe that. Now you do.


That is correct, after some evaluation I realized you were lying to try
and
save your ***** from embarrassment at getting caught.


You are just the piece of ***** I thought you were. Big deal.


You call me the piece of *****, and it was YOU...who posted in several other
newsgroups using MY NAME and a ficticious e-mail address.

What lying sack of *****. No wonder your first wife left you.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: One More Republican Bites The Dust! 06 Oct 2005 10:16:31 AM
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:061020050755169314%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <pcydnZI0e9HphNjeRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

And thank you too. So where are these "educated"
pro-choicers
and
Democrats?


Some of them are out here licking your ***** every week.


No thanks, you can't lick my *****. I am not into that, you
are.


Hey! Look everyone!


Yea, look..Barnes likes to "lick asses"


The VERY childish Osprey is so frustrated he has

now resorted to forging posts!


Forging?


Yeah. You shameless.


Explain why you posts in other newsgroups, using other peoples
names
and
ficticious e-mail addresses.


You said you didn't believe that. Now you do.


That is correct, after some evaluation I realized you were lying to
try
and
save your ***** from embarrassment at getting caught.


You are just the piece of ***** I thought you were. Big deal.


You call me the piece of *****, and it was YOU...who posted in several
other
newsgroups using MY NAME and a ficticious e-mail address.


What lying sack of *****. No wonder your first wife left you.

And you continue to lie
osprey wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96DCACB8F6863keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...

Louise <> wrote in news:ba3ej15itmn2ip37auvu9ct38ua61cnnv4@4ax.com:

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:54:08 -0400, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

Oh hell, you are hearing voices again. I truly hoped you had that
worked out.


Remember the

address you wanted us to forget and
said it was strictly for posting purposes? You've used it post your
crank, anti-liberal ***** on other posts using it.



since he has posting using that address, it is a public address open to
email, right?

here is a post he made from that address: http://tinyurl.com/a33br


Let's take a look at this forged posting James is using and take note of
the
many faults.

Path:
controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!peer02.cox.net!cox.net!p01!fed1read06.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: OT Iraq: US losing cherished "credibility", ROTFLMAO
From: Robert Heishman <rheish...@state.de.us>
Newsgroups: alt.support.marriage,alt.support.divorce,misc.survivalism
Message-ID: <300520042333465973%

>
References: <c9eeo3$6ng$0@pita.alt.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Thoth/1.7.0 (Carbon/OS X)
Lines: 9
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 23:33:46 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.111.228.148
X-Complaints-To:

X-Trace: fed1read06 1085985226 68.111.228.148 (Mon, 31 May 2004 02:33:46
EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 02:33:46 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications



A) There is no
mailing address. (mistake number 1
on
your part)
B) The state doesn't use "Cox Communications" (mistake number 2 on your
part)
C) NNTP-Posting Host NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.111.228.148 (mistake number 3
on your part)

If you worthless pieces of ***** are going to lie about me and make this
dumb
***** up, you are going to simply have to do better than that.



So who post from NNTP - Posting Host 68.111.228.148?

Answer:

David Barnes

68.111.228.148
Cox Communications Inc. COX-ATLANTA-2 (NET-68-96-0-0-1)
68.96.0.0 - 68.111.255.255
Cox Communications NETBLK-SD-RDC-68-111-128-0 (NET-68-111-128-0-1)
68.111.128.0 - 68.111.255.255

Get real idiots, you are getting more and more desperate.

Now Barnes is trying to post using my name and a fictitious e-mail
address...and on top of it, using the state of Delaware IN his forgery.

Now, there will be those who will say "prove it is Barnes"
O.k., here is a post from Barnes around that time period. Take special
note on the NNTP-Posting Host and see if it looks familiar.
Oh, and No One, I hope you are paying close attention to this. This is
how stupid these idiots can get and you remember Barnes...your new
buddy. Just remember this is how low he will get.
Anyway, here is the post with the header.
Path:
controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!p01!fed1read07.POSTED!VoteKerry
Subject: Re: "Morning After" Pill nixed.
From: "David W. Barnes" <VoteKe...@dbarnes.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.abortion,soc.culture.usa,talk.abortion,alt.bible,alt.politics.usa.republican
Message-ID: <100520041917496925%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com>
References: <bLXmc.1197$BJ6.108578@attbi_s51>
<20040507234937.11380.00001152@mb-m18.aol.com>
<409cfb08.111480316@netnews.mchsi.com>
<w7gnc.7963$536.1615336@attbi_s03>
<080520041851522782%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com>
<u_6dnV1XK5HrCgDdRVn-hA@heartoftn.net>
<080520041950424583%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com>
<1e57ec88.0405100954.5adb1440@posting.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Thoth/1.7.0 (Carbon/OS X)
Lines: 27
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 19:17:49 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.111.228.148
X-Complaints-To:

X-Trace: fed1read07 1084241869 68.111.228.148 (Mon, 10 May 2004
22:17:49 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 22:17:49 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Now, let us once again review this and see just how stupid Keegan and
Louise have gotten.
First..
They said I posted from the e-mail address

That was the first mistake, there is no such state e-mail address.
Second..the NTTP Posting Host on the posting Keegan uses is
68.111.228.148
Third..the IP comes from Cox Communications, not the State of Delaware
and Fourth...I supplied a posting from David Barnes during that month
and year, and the NTTP Posting Host is IDENTICAL
68.111.228.148
What's their next pathetic attempt going to be?
.























  Page 1 of 5

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5