On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:45:04 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:18:14 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 07:39:46 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Hey, little queer turkey, don't you understand, unlike the election worker, that
buying a house does not change an address automatically.

Hey self-loathing gay Earl Weber. A law is broken, period.

Ok, so you're not old enough to vote either and see how the system protects
against people voting in the wrong precinct.

LOL! The system says that you CANNOT vote in the wrong district.
period.

Now make sure all your little ***** 'rat buddies understand that.

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:54:50 -0500, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:

So, Coulter's too stupid to know that, or is she too stupid to
understand when she's told that she can't vote in that district?

Well, you sound like an ***** hole who doesn't understand that she was still
registered in the locale where she voted. You see, she couldn't vote if she was
registered in another area. Her name wouldn't be listed.

She violated election law by voting where she was not allowed to vote.
She was even told that at one poll and went to another to vote
illegally there. What about that is so hard to understand?

What is so hard for you to understand that a person is not allowed to vote
unless their name is specifically located on the voter rolls positioned at that
very polling place. If your name is not on the list for the polling place, you
don't vote.

You're not old enough to vote, are you?

Good grief - to think you might vote one day.

You better go back to junior high and learn about the election system in this
country. I'm afraid that one day you might even be a voter. Heaven help us.

Your reading in a paper that she bought a new house across town don't mean
diddle squat except how stupid you are.

Except that she voted illegally, and you're defending that. It's about
what I expect from you, however, since it's obvious that fair
elections are the last thing you'd want.

You're a dumbass - you don't understand how the system works.

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:54:50 -0500, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:

So, Coulter's too stupid to know that, or is she too stupid to
understand when she's told that she can't vote in that district?

Well, you sound like an ***** hole who doesn't understand that she was still
registered in the locale where she voted. You see, she couldn't vote if she was
registered in another area. Her name wouldn't be listed.

She violated election law by voting where she was not allowed to vote.
She was even told that at one poll and went to another to vote
illegally there. What about that is so hard to understand?

What is so hard for you to understand that a person is not allowed to vote
unless their name is specifically located on the voter rolls positioned at that
very polling place. If your name is not on the list for the polling place, you
don't vote.

Not only certified, but declared correct by the laws of the country. They
represent the desires of the people of this country, and we want conservatism.

But they're not certified, not correct, and not secure, and by using
them you are declaring that you're not interested in secure or fair
elections.

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:08:08 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:34:26 -0500, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:

Better luck next time, elmer fudd.

By machines that aren't secure and don't keep physical records.
Yup, that's 'certified'.

Not only certified, but declared correct by the laws of the country. They
represent the desires of the people of this country, and we want conservatism.

But they're not certified, not correct, and not secure, and by using
them you are declaring that you're not interested in secure or fair
elections.

But then, neo-cons have never been interested in fair elections.

---
I bought a Venus Fly Trap today. I was going to name it
'Republican', but the fly trap is beneficial to the
environment. I'll save that name - someday I might find
a plant that eats poor people and minorities.

Not only certified, but declared correct by the laws of the country. They
represent the desires of the people of this country, and we want conservatism.

I'm a conservative who'd rather have Diebold eradicated from the face of the
earth, for being so willing to destroy trust in elections in this country,
thanks to the gang of thieves inside the Beltway.

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:09:05 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 07:38:34 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

The last time I checked, our victories were certified.
Better luck next time, elmer fudd.

Does Elmer Fudd shoots his hunting partners by mistake too?

I think elmer fudd wants a midnight rendezvous with you, little queer yang.

Elmer Fudd has a three way sex with you and Alito, *****.