| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
15 Feb 2007 08:52:20 PM |
| Object: |
Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3131 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Yang's Big Lie |
16 Feb 2007 07:14:26 AM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
news:026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com:
<...>
I made no claims that aren't substantiated.
Yang, of course, likes to pretend otherwise, so that he can then pretend
that "Bush Calls Out Fred's Lie", but that's just Bush calling out Yang's
Lies.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You can without fail judge the worthiness of any hysteria-du-jour. If the
usual suspects are behind it, put one hand on your wallet and the other on
your privates and lock your door and load your guns. They're coming for
you.
Cui bono? Not the people but the regulators. But it was ever thus."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
15 Feb 2007 11:34:51 PM |
|
|
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 12:38:27 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 04:45:56 PM |
|
|
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morton Davis" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 07:19:08 PM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation - as reported by ABC World News - was that it was
"the first time military officials.made the link to the highest level
of Iran's government." But the briefing "offered no evidence" to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly.
NOPE.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
18 Feb 2007 09:28:40 PM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
They'd have to release Rove from the basement.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
18 Feb 2007 11:22:39 PM |
|
|
In article <0ZadnQR_r__4hETYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
They'd have to release Rove from the basement.
Or he'd have to consult Barney.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
19 Feb 2007 01:05:58 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-088B82.21223918022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <0ZadnQR_r__4hETYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it
was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest
level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels
of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its
claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
They'd have to release Rove from the basement.
Or he'd have to consult Barney.
The dog, dinosaur or cartoon caveman?
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
19 Feb 2007 06:00:07 PM |
|
|
In article <wtydndSn26vP0UTYnZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-088B82.21223918022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <0ZadnQR_r__4hETYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it
was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest
level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels
of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its
claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
They'd have to release Rove from the basement.
Or he'd have to consult Barney.
The dog, dinosaur or cartoon caveman?
I don't think that Barney the dog is speaking to him anymore (even a dog
can only take so much) so it must be one of the other two.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sylvia R. Dickinson" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
19 Feb 2007 09:00:14 AM |
|
|
On Feb 19, 1:05 am, "Michelle Malkin" <hypati...@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachm...@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-088B82.21223918022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <0ZadnQR_r__4hETYnZ2dnUVZ_sapn...@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypati...@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachm...@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74...@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <car...@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachm...@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6ti...@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation - as reported by ABC World News - was that it
was
"the first time military officials...made the link to the highest
level
of Iran's government." But the briefing "offered no evidence" to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels
of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its
claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
They'd have to release Rove from the basement.
Or he'd have to consult Barney.
The dog, dinosaur or cartoon caveman?
Barney Pfeiff, who else! ;-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
19 Feb 2007 11:32:37 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 02:05:58 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-088B82.21223918022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <0ZadnQR_r__4hETYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it
was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest
level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels
of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its
claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
They'd have to release Rove from the basement.
Or he'd have to consult Barney.
The dog, dinosaur or cartoon caveman?
All of the above, but I think Barney the dog is the senior staff
member.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
19 Feb 2007 05:37:20 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:32:37 GMT, Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net>
wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 02:05:58 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-088B82.21223918022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <0ZadnQR_r__4hETYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com...
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it
was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest
level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels
of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its
claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
They'd have to release Rove from the basement.
Or he'd have to consult Barney.
The dog, dinosaur or cartoon caveman?
All of the above, but I think Barney the dog is the senior staff
member.
At least he's the most intelligent.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
27 Feb 2007 08:09:43 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:45:56 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
Pelosi. :D
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 05:34:56 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:45:56 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
Karl Rove?
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 11:56:16 PM |
|
|
In article <kqfct2pglbr4obhddpr5tpq65k6a4d03cb@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:45:56 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
Karl Rove?
Karl's been quiet as of late. Because of the last election results, he's
probably sharing the dog house with Barney.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
17 Feb 2007 04:07:07 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:56:16 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <kqfct2pglbr4obhddpr5tpq65k6a4d03cb@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:45:56 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
Karl Rove?
Karl's been quiet as of late. Because of the last election results, he's
probably sharing the dog house with Barney.
Yeah, but he's the best they've got in his area of expertise. He
might have got a nice smack on the nose with a rolled up newspaper,
but that's about it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
17 Feb 2007 05:08:41 PM |
|
|
In article <31vet2lh28ho6ehl799hq5ns8hbh9hvmfi@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:56:16 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <kqfct2pglbr4obhddpr5tpq65k6a4d03cb@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:45:56 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it
was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest
level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
Karl Rove?
Karl's been quiet as of late. Because of the last election results, he's
probably sharing the dog house with Barney.
Yeah, but he's the best they've got in his area of expertise. He
might have got a nice smack on the nose with a rolled up newspaper,
but that's about it.
Heh! Bad Rove! Bad Rove!
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
17 Feb 2007 06:23:23 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:08:41 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <31vet2lh28ho6ehl799hq5ns8hbh9hvmfi@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:56:16 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <kqfct2pglbr4obhddpr5tpq65k6a4d03cb@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:45:56 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it
was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest
level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
Karl Rove?
Karl's been quiet as of late. Because of the last election results, he's
probably sharing the dog house with Barney.
Yeah, but he's the best they've got in his area of expertise. He
might have got a nice smack on the nose with a rolled up newspaper,
but that's about it.
Heh! Bad Rove! Bad Rove!
Think Deadeye ***** Cheney will take him along to flush birds when he
takes Scooter on his "goodbye hunt before going to prison"?
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
17 Feb 2007 11:31:03 PM |
|
|
In article <vu6ft25l3a2hbl3o77tcsdnhpvrmegcnrv@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:08:41 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <31vet2lh28ho6ehl799hq5ns8hbh9hvmfi@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:56:16 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <kqfct2pglbr4obhddpr5tpq65k6a4d03cb@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:45:56 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it
was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest
level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for
an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels
of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its
claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and
more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
Karl Rove?
Karl's been quiet as of late. Because of the last election results, he's
probably sharing the dog house with Barney.
Yeah, but he's the best they've got in his area of expertise. He
might have got a nice smack on the nose with a rolled up newspaper,
but that's about it.
Heh! Bad Rove! Bad Rove!
Think Deadeye ***** Cheney will take him along to flush birds when he
takes Scooter on his "goodbye hunt before going to prison"?
Hey, Karl! Stand next to Scooter there. I'm getting low on ammo.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
18 Feb 2007 11:42:34 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:31:03 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <vu6ft25l3a2hbl3o77tcsdnhpvrmegcnrv@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:08:41 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <31vet2lh28ho6ehl799hq5ns8hbh9hvmfi@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:56:16 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <kqfct2pglbr4obhddpr5tpq65k6a4d03cb@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:45:56 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it
was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest
level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for
an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels
of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its
claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and
more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
Karl Rove?
Karl's been quiet as of late. Because of the last election results, he's
probably sharing the dog house with Barney.
Yeah, but he's the best they've got in his area of expertise. He
might have got a nice smack on the nose with a rolled up newspaper,
but that's about it.
Heh! Bad Rove! Bad Rove!
Think Deadeye ***** Cheney will take him along to flush birds when he
takes Scooter on his "goodbye hunt before going to prison"?
Hey, Karl! Stand next to Scooter there. I'm getting low on ammo.
Yeah, but from the sound of things being next to the target is the
safest place to be when ol' Deadeye ***** swings into action!
Then of course you wait until the next day to report the incident...
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
18 Feb 2007 11:25:26 PM |
|
|
In article <ls3ht2dbjtibtjltv13qpkks3q5ul8ghqe@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:31:03 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <vu6ft25l3a2hbl3o77tcsdnhpvrmegcnrv@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:08:41 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <31vet2lh28ho6ehl799hq5ns8hbh9hvmfi@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:56:16 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <kqfct2pglbr4obhddpr5tpq65k6a4d03cb@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:45:56 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac
<jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that
it
was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the
highest
level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence”
to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny
for
an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest
levels
of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its
claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and
more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney
were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to do?
Karl Rove?
Karl's been quiet as of late. Because of the last election results,
he's
probably sharing the dog house with Barney.
Yeah, but he's the best they've got in his area of expertise. He
might have got a nice smack on the nose with a rolled up newspaper,
but that's about it.
Heh! Bad Rove! Bad Rove!
Think Deadeye ***** Cheney will take him along to flush birds when he
takes Scooter on his "goodbye hunt before going to prison"?
Hey, Karl! Stand next to Scooter there. I'm getting low on ammo.
Yeah, but from the sound of things being next to the target is the
safest place to be when ol' Deadeye ***** swings into action!
Then of course you wait until the next day to report the incident...
Or until ***** sobers up, whichever occurs first.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 07:02:11 PM |
|
|
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News —
was that it was “the first time military officials…made the link
to the highest level of Iran’s government.” But the briefing
“offered no evidence” to substantiate that claim. After coming
under intense scrutiny for an intelligence presentation that was
approved by the highest levels of the administration, the White
House has slowly backed off its claims of Iranian government
involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to
do?
Jebus, just like always.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
AUTHORITARIANS ARE PERVERTS. Why?
--They consider themselves shepherds.
--They consider the rest of us sheep.
--Shepherds ***** sheep.
--Therefore AUTHORITARIANS ARE PERVERTS.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 11:54:38 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns98D9C28558275askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>,
Doc Smartass <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in
news:jhachmann-38BAFA.14455616022007@news.giganews.com:
In article <efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the
highlight of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News —
was that it was “the first time military officials…made the link
to the highest level of Iran’s government.” But the briefing
“offered no evidence” to substantiate that claim. After coming
under intense scrutiny for an intelligence presentation that was
approved by the highest levels of the administration, the White
House has slowly backed off its claims of Iranian government
involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Exactly. That's why they were scared stiff of the Libby trial. If
Cheney were impeached and removed, who would tell the Shrub what to
do?
Jebus, just like always.
But isn't it Cheney who whispers in his ear when he sleeps: "I'm Jesus
and I want you to bomb Iran."?
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 12:42:17 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:38:27 GMT, in alt.atheism
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote in
<efubt2d7mh34qknbueq5chqqpc6jk74n59@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
Why does Bush even bother saying anything. It's looking more and more
like Cheney is and had been the real president.
Because incompetence is more plausible if Bush made the decision. If it
was Cheney's then we are looking at intentional failure.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 01:30:14 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
LOL!
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3131 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 11:58:16 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac wrote:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
You mean President Cheney don't you?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"There is something feeble and a little contemptible about
a man who cannot face the perils of life without the help of
comfortable myths. Almost inevitably some part of him is
aware that they are myths and that he believes them only
because they are comforting. But he dare not face this
thought! Moreover, since he is aware, however dimly, that his
opinions are not rational, he becomes furious when they are
disputed." - Bertrand Russell
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 04:46:52 PM |
|
|
In article <eM-dnSNFu6ElbUjYnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac wrote:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
You mean President Cheney don't you?
Dear Leader *****.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 05:42:22 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:46:52 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <eM-dnSNFu6ElbUjYnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac wrote:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
You mean President Cheney don't you?
Dear Leader *****.
LOL!
Careful now! You might get sent on an all expenses paid hunting trip
with the Dear Leader.
http://www.internetweekly.org/images/cheney_shoots_scooter.jpg
http://www.deepthoughtyourself.com/image-dynamic/image-113.jpg
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Oops, Bush Calls Out Fred's Iran Lie |
16 Feb 2007 11:52:09 PM |
|
|
In article <btfct2dt1dhjvkvfcpknsrqd3l7d5jof1l@4ax.com>,
Carl Wilson <carl_w@swbell.net> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:46:52 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
In article <eM-dnSNFu6ElbUjYnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:34:51 -0800, johac wrote:
In article <026at29hpu3ief1bl96es53tqvko6tiks5@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
And when the WH is more honest than you....
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/15/blaming-the-briefer/
While much of the information had previously been known, the highlight
of the presentation — as reported by ABC World News — was that it was
“the first time military officials…made the link to the highest level
of Iran’s government.” But the briefing “offered no evidence” to
substantiate that claim. After coming under intense scrutiny for an
intelligence presentation that was approved by the highest levels of
the administration, the White House has slowly backed off its claims
of Iranian government involvement.
Bushy forgot his talking points. Uncle ***** is going to be mad.
You mean President Cheney don't you?
Dear Leader *****.
LOL!
Careful now! You might get sent on an all expenses paid hunting trip
with the Dear Leader.
http://www.internetweekly.org/images/cheney_shoots_scooter.jpg
http://www.deepthoughtyourself.com/image-dynamic/image-113.jpg
LOL! Those are good!
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
