"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-DFBAD5.21055113062007@individual.net...

In article <2o0ci.20346$kY6.3647@edtnps82>,
"jcs" <jcs_2@hotmail.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-78FA88.10534113062007@individual.net...

In article <RIHbi.18035$vT6.318@edtnps90>, "jcs" <jcs_2@hotmail.com>
wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-80C040.19594612062007@individual.net...

In article <eOFbi.22048$nx3.19032@edtnps89>,
"jcs" <jcs_2@hotmail.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-93AA6E.11282212062007@individual.net...

knowing how seriously osprey takes making claims, i felt he'd
appreciate the opportunity to support the claim he made shown in
the
appended article.


Path:
g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!indi
vid
ual.net!not-for-mail
From: "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.bush,alt.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion,
alt
.politics.republicans,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.rush-
lim
baugh,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Bill O'Reilly Implicated- Libel Suit
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:50:49 -0400
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <jgkeegan-B25B6F.21504911062007@individual.net>
References: <kzDai.966$TC1.708@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net>
<jgkeegan-3617F2.16240509062007@individual.net>
<pan.2007.06.09.21.37.54.413999@hiwaay.net>
<jgkeegan-A57A23.19571609062007@individual.net>
<Pine.OSX.4.63.0706102109550.966@john-maysons-ibook-g4.local>
<OKidnWZXn4LHLPHbnZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com>
<Pine.WNT.4.64.0706111219590.2808@jmayson-wxp.cisco.com>
<QvOdnXzAvvL9ZvDbnZ2dnUVZ_q-vnZ2d@comcast.com>
X-Trace: individual.net
0ze1osUnKEDTaC0h08uMGQ56tlgImsTjzXJUdPt+sDZmXA40hl
X-Orig-Path: jgkeegan
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (PPC Mac OS X)

In article <QvOdnXzAvvL9ZvDbnZ2dnUVZ_q-vn...@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:

There are some politicians who think we should start taking out
key
targets
now in Iran. Iran is a real threat, not just to Israel either.

name these alleged "politicians."

"If you are going to make the claim, prove it. "
coward bobby heishman posting as osprey
news:8912d58d.0307090126.4a25ab87@posting.google.com:

"Your statement is to be considered a lie until you
can prove it to be true."
"osprey" in
<1161104485.981302.246...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

i predict coward bobby will run away from his claim, as he has
done
so many times in the past.

I predict james g. keegan jr. will never get over his obsession
with
Osprey,

i wonder what kind of psyche would refer to asking someone to
support
a claim as an obsession.

a sick one, i think

No sicker than one who would post multiple times per day when the rest
of
the reading world has gotten over the fact that said claim is never
going
to
be supported.

you're lying.

prove that i have posted "multiple times per day when the rest of
the reading world has gotten over the fact that said claim is never
going to be supported."

what you are whining about is a once a day "reminder" on two distinct
claims, although i could have posted reminders on several hundred
such claims. and of course the claims are not going to be supported.
that is the only reason for asking that they be supported --- to
demonstrate the character of the person posting the (false) claims.

i'll expect to see your apology.

You'll be waiting a long time then.

you still don't get it.

i only asked for your apology for lying to demonstrate your character.

you had pretty much done that already defending osprey's lies. as i
said, you're a sicko.

I've defended no-one's lies. In fact, I even said, "...said claim is never
going to be supported." My only purpose in posting was to express my
frustration at what seems to me to be an inordinate amount of posting on
your part regarding this issue. I will concede, upon looking more closely,
that your "supporting claims" posts were not all posted on one day; however,
when I checked in after several days, there were about six there at once.
My fault for not paying enough attention to "day #2" "day #3", etc.
However, I still consider your posting on this subject obsessive, and that's
the last I'm going to say about it.

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-DFBAD5.21055113062007@individual.net...

In article <2o0ci.20346$kY6.3647@edtnps82>,
"jcs" <jcs_2@hotmail.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-78FA88.10534113062007@individual.net...

In article <RIHbi.18035$vT6.318@edtnps90>, "jcs" <jcs_2@hotmail.com>
wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-80C040.19594612062007@individual.net...

In article <eOFbi.22048$nx3.19032@edtnps89>,
"jcs" <jcs_2@hotmail.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-93AA6E.11282212062007@individual.net...

knowing how seriously osprey takes making claims, i felt he'd
appreciate the opportunity to support the claim he made shown in
the
appended article.


Path:
g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individ
ual.net!not-for-mail
From: "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.bush,alt.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion,alt
.politics.republicans,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.rush-lim
baugh,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Bill O'Reilly Implicated- Libel Suit
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:50:49 -0400
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <jgkeegan-B25B6F.21504911062007@individual.net>
References: <kzDai.966$TC1.708@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net>
<jgkeegan-3617F2.16240509062007@individual.net>
<pan.2007.06.09.21.37.54.413999@hiwaay.net>
<jgkeegan-A57A23.19571609062007@individual.net>
<Pine.OSX.4.63.0706102109550.966@john-maysons-ibook-g4.local>
<OKidnWZXn4LHLPHbnZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com>
<Pine.WNT.4.64.0706111219590.2808@jmayson-wxp.cisco.com>
<QvOdnXzAvvL9ZvDbnZ2dnUVZ_q-vnZ2d@comcast.com>
X-Trace: individual.net
0ze1osUnKEDTaC0h08uMGQ56tlgImsTjzXJUdPt+sDZmXA40hl
X-Orig-Path: jgkeegan
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (PPC Mac OS X)

In article <QvOdnXzAvvL9ZvDbnZ2dnUVZ_q-vn...@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:

There are some politicians who think we should start taking out
key
targets
now in Iran. Iran is a real threat, not just to Israel either.

name these alleged "politicians."

"If you are going to make the claim, prove it. "
coward bobby heishman posting as osprey
news:8912d58d.0307090126.4a25ab87@posting.google.com:

"Your statement is to be considered a lie until you
can prove it to be true."
"osprey" in
<1161104485.981302.246...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

i predict coward bobby will run away from his claim, as he has
done
so many times in the past.

I predict james g. keegan jr. will never get over his obsession
with
Osprey,

i wonder what kind of psyche would refer to asking someone to
support
a claim as an obsession.

a sick one, i think

No sicker than one who would post multiple times per day when the rest
of
the reading world has gotten over the fact that said claim is never
going
to
be supported.

you're lying.

prove that i have posted "multiple times per day when the rest of
the reading world has gotten over the fact that said claim is never
going to be supported."

what you are whining about is a once a day "reminder" on two distinct
claims, although i could have posted reminders on several hundred
such claims. and of course the claims are not going to be supported.
that is the only reason for asking that they be supported --- to
demonstrate the character of the person posting the (false) claims.

i'll expect to see your apology.

You'll be waiting a long time then.

you still don't get it.

i only asked for your apology for lying to demonstrate your character.

you had pretty much done that already defending osprey's lies. as i
said, you're a sicko.

I've defended no-one's lies. In fact, I even said, "...said claim is never
going to be supported." My only purpose in posting was to express my
frustration at what seems to me to be an inordinate amount of posting on
your part regarding this issue.