| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
18 Nov 2004 11:02:10 AM |
| Object: |
"Osprey" reminder #1 |
osprey .... just a reminder that your lie about paul anderson as detailed
in the post below remains open. you need to withdraw it and apologize,
right?
=====regin repost
From: "james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.abortion,houston.general,talk.abortion,ca.politics,tx.politics
Subject: Re: The Scott Peterson verdict .
Date: 18 Nov 2004 08:35:02 GMT
Organization: t.s.a.k.c.
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <Xns95A52472D7225keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>
References: <9c2d0f9a.0411142126.2ca48081@posting.google.com>
<41984820.1813881493@news.la.sbcglobal.net> <e28f060c.0411170934.5b4f1a9
@posting.google.com> <419c1da8.2065042704@news.la.sbcglobal.net> <t7Odne9-
Jb2ggwHcRVn-oQ@comcast.com>
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de
vEo7PV8gNZ/e91djdNVn6g5kknQ0OhQJ1nPp+iuv75wMe5F5wp
User-Agent: Xnews/06.08.25
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:t7Odne9-Jb2ggwHcRVn-
oQ@comcast.com:
"Paul Anderson" <elcoyote@netzero.net> wrote in message
news:419c1da8.2065042704@news.la.sbcglobal.net...
Was there a purpose to that crap? How many times must I state that I
do not advocate killing anything.
That is a lie Paul.
your claim is a lie.
You advocate women getting abortions.
you are lying again.
post evidence that paul has ever advocated even one women having an
abortion.
but you won't. you'll run away from yet another of your lies.
Abortions kill.
so does removing a cancer, washing your face, and any number of other
things.
Your lying isn't fooling anyone
look in a mirror, coward.
now run away from your lie.
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
==end repost
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
| User: "Sports Pants" |
|
| Title: Re: "Osprey" reminder #1 |
18 Nov 2004 03:54:44 PM |
|
|
Why don't you settle your own accounts before you ask *other* people to
apologize for lying? (Oh yeah, and Malapert, Fisher, Anderson... all these
people lied or offered ***** spurious arguments to me and never
apologized, so why are apologies incumbent on pro-lifers?)
=======
From: (Tripping in Tempur Fields)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion
Subject: Re: Do we live in a low abortion culture?
Organization: no experts were consulted in the making of this post
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:40:43 GMT
In article <Xns9533E6820F42Fkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>, "james g.
keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
(Tripping in Tempur Fields) wrote in
news:tagutcow-2707042210250001@user-0c992qm.cable.mindspring.com:
Well the average woman in the USSR had an average of six abortions in
her lifetime. Boy howdy, those women sure were liberated!
do you apologize for lying when someone asks you to document a false claim
like the one you made here?
Supposing I could produce some online references, I would imagine it
would be you who would have to apologize for saying I was lying.
=====
http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/econn/econn011.pdf
Abortion is the main method of birth control in the Soviet
Union, with a working woman having an average of eight abortions
in a life time. The main reason for this is that there is no other
widely available form of contraception and a Soviet family has to
have two incomes. The woman is therefore forced to work by
economic circumstances.
intranet.westminster.org.uk/publications/elizabethan/magazine/2001/p23.htm
"In some countries, abortion is the most popular form of contraception;
in the former USSR, for example, the average woman has 6 to 7 abortions in
her lifetime, the mental and physical implications of which are
horrifying."
http://www.icddrb.org/pub/publication.jsp?classificationID=30&pubID=301
"In the more eastern countries of Western Europe, such as Romania and
Bulgaria, the effective practice of withdrawal had never been widespread,
and abortion played the dominant role. In the former USSR-the first
country to permit legal abortion (in 1920)-up to 3 of 4 pregnancies were
being aborted, at least in Moscow."
http://www.cbctrust.com/abortion.html
Abortion has traditionally been the primary method of birth control in the
Soviet Union because of a lack of contraceptive devices and information,
and because of the traditional orientation of the Soviet health service
system towards termination, not prevention, of pregnancy. Officially, 55%
of known pregnancies are terminated by abortion, but the true rate is
probably higher.90 The level of induced abortion is higher in the former
USSR than in any other country in the world.91 It is not uncommon for a
Soviet woman to have four or five abortions and a few women to have as
many as twenty.
http://www.lib.utah.edu/epubs/undergrad/vol7/kotlyar.html
"Olga Lipovskaya, 35 years old, married three times, two children, and
seven abortions: "You stand in line before the door of the operating room,
seven or eight of you, waiting to be taken in. The clinic's staff is too
busy to do anything but operate, so as each woman who's finished staggers
out you take turns getting out of line for a few minutes, just to help her
get to the resting room down the hall. Then it's your turn, and you go
into a hall splattered with blood where two doctors are aborting seven or
eight women at the same time; they're usually very rough and rude,
shouting at you about keeping your legs wide open...if you're lucky they
give you a little sedative, mostly Valium. Then it's your turn to stagger
out to the resting room, where you're not allowed to spend more than two
hours because the production line, you see, is always very busy." Olga
estimates that she will have about fourteen abortions in total, which she
guesses to be the national average. She knows women who have had
twenty-five."
=======
Was I lying because the average Soviet woman had *more* than six
abortions? In any case, I hope you're able to defend your statement in
less time than it took to accuse *me* of lying.
=''' TWIDN ¤ http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow
c oo email ¤
| \
- Investigative ~ Navigable ~ Vestigial ~ Fiduciary
--
----> ROBERT CAPONI: The man who with the power of his brain plumbed
the depths of the mysteries of the Universe. <---------
€ http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow € http://tagutcow.yafro.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - Mayo-nize Your Turkeyburger - - - - - - -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: "Osprey" reminder #1 |
18 Nov 2004 08:12:13 PM |
|
|
(Sports Pants) wrote in
news:tagutcow-1711040933050001@user-0c992qm.cable.mindspring.com:
Why don't you settle your own accounts before you ask *other* people to
apologize for lying? (Oh yeah, and Malapert, Fisher,
Ah, yes, I remember the great Ray Fisher/James Keegan
flamefest of 1996. Or was it 97? A long time ago, anyway.
One of my first introductions to the Ways of Usenet. Don't
even remember what the argument was over any more.....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: "Osprey" reminder #1 |
18 Nov 2004 07:11:22 PM |
|
|
(Sports Pants) wrote in
news:tagutcow-1711040933050001@user-0c992qm.cable.mindspring.com:
Why don't you settle your own accounts before you ask *other* people to
apologize for lying? (Oh yeah, and Malapert, Fisher, Anderson... all
these people lied or offered ***** spurious arguments to me and never
apologized, so why are apologies incumbent on pro-lifers?)
your misrepresentations were exposed long ago by a half-dozen people.
you did posotion yourself where you belong, though, defending the abortion
newsgroup's most prolific liar.
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sports Pants" |
|
| Title: Re: "Osprey" reminder #1 |
18 Nov 2004 10:14:46 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns95A5CD5E4F460keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.165>, "james g.
keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
tagutcow@earthlink.net (Sports Pants) wrote in
news:tagutcow-1711040933050001@user-0c992qm.cable.mindspring.com:
Why don't you settle your own accounts before you ask *other* people to
apologize for lying? (Oh yeah, and Malapert, Fisher, Anderson... all
these people lied or offered ***** spurious arguments to me and never
apologized, so why are apologies incumbent on pro-lifers?)
your misrepresentations were exposed long ago by a half-dozen people.
??? Who? When did that many people even pay attention to me? If you
haven't noticed, I'm a pretty minor player around here.
you did posotion yourself where you belong, though, defending the abortion
newsgroup's most prolific liar.
Who's that? When? I R CONFUSED!
Even if I am a lying scumbag, I still think you should be the bigger man
and apologize.
--
----> ROBERT CAPONI: The man who with the power of his brain plumbed
the depths of the mysteries of the Universe. <---------
€ http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow € http://tagutcow.yafro.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - Mayo-nize Your Turkeyburger - - - - - - -
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: "Osprey" reminder #1 |
19 Nov 2004 05:44:03 AM |
|
|
(Sports Pants) wrote in
news:tagutcow-1711041553070001@user-0c992qm.cable.mindspring.com:
In article <Xns95A5CD5E4F460keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.165>, "james g.
keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
(Sports Pants) wrote in
news:tagutcow-1711040933050001@user-0c992qm.cable.mindspring.com:
Why don't you settle your own accounts before you ask *other* people
to
apologize for lying? (Oh yeah, and Malapert, Fisher, Anderson... all
these people lied or offered ***** spurious arguments to me and
never apologized, so why are apologies incumbent on pro-lifers?)
your misrepresentations were exposed long ago by a half-dozen people.
??? Who? When did that many people even pay attention to me? If you
haven't noticed, I'm a pretty minor player around here.
yes, you are definately that.
you did posotion yourself where you belong, though, defending the
abortion newsgroup's most prolific liar.
Who's that? When? I R CONFUSED!
you need to read the posts you reply to.
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Graczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: "Osprey" reminder #1 |
20 Nov 2004 04:24:13 PM |
|
|
<mgi2483@motorola.com> wrote in message
Yeah, right!
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
