| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
01 Sep 2007 08:41:08 PM |
| Object: |
osprey's dilemna |
a few days ago, someone commented that osprey (robert heishman) was
being ganged up on.
several folks replied that heishman was not being ganged up on so
much as that many of the people heishman had posted malicious lies
about were confronting heishman on his lies. it is an ugly situation
that takes away from the newsgroup. i am a big contributor to that
since i comment on heishman's lies often, several times daily many
days. mind you, i don't comment on all of his lies. i don't think any
single human being could do that.
the current status is that many people comment frequently on
heishman's more malicious lies; some even comment on heishman's
meaningless lies.
what should heishman do?
imagine for a moment that heishman actually posts a sincere apology
for one of his lies. (i don't mean the kind of ugly, flame-filled
apologies that he has posted once or twice, but a sincere apology.)
in this hypothetical scenario, heishman apologizes for a lie.
what happens?
many regulars will simply start bashing him for a different lie.
let's say he apologizes for that lie too.
then what happens.
the same thing happens.! many regulars will simply start bashing him
for yet a different lie.
the cycle will repeat itself, over and over. heishman probably
figured this out.
what can he do?
of course, at some point, continuing to bash him for his old lies
will become meaningless and it will stop, unless, of course, he keeps
posting new lies.
What is heishman to do? what can he do?
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
| User: "Gwenyth Bennet" |
|
| Title: Re: osprey's dilemna |
02 Sep 2007 09:36:05 AM |
|
|
On Sep 1, 8:47 pm, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:jgkeegan-A579B0.21410801092007@individual.net...
a few days ago, someone commented that osprey (robert heishman) was
being ganged up on.
several folks replied that heishman was not being ganged up on so
much as that many of the people heishman had posted malicious lies
about were confronting heishman on his lies. it is an ugly situation
that takes away from the newsgroup. i am a big contributor to that
since i comment on heishman's lies often, several times daily many
days. mind you, i don't comment on all of his lies. i don't think any
single human being could do that.
the current status is that many people comment frequently on
heishman's more malicious lies; some even comment on heishman's
meaningless lies.
what should heishman do?
imagine for a moment that heishman actually posts a sincere apology
for one of his lies. (i don't mean the kind of ugly, flame-filled
apologies that he has posted once or twice, but a sincere apology.)
in this hypothetical scenario, heishman apologizes for a lie.
what happens?
many regulars will simply start bashing him for a different lie.
let's say he apologizes for that lie too.
then what happens.
the same thing happens.! many regulars will simply start bashing him
for yet a different lie.
the cycle will repeat itself, over and over. heishman probably
figured this out.
what can he do?
of course, at some point, continuing to bash him for his old lies
will become meaningless and it will stop, unless, of course, he keeps
posting new lies.
What is heishman to do? what can he do?
Well for starters, you are putting yourself in a bad situation with libel
issues.
Your actions are what have you in hot water, these days.
Think about it..:o)
It's going to be hard trying to prove that -- after all, what we do
say about you IS true.
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
innews:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: osprey's dilemna |
02 Sep 2007 12:36:40 AM |
|
|
Osprey <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-A579B0.21410801092007@individual.net...
a few days ago, someone commented that osprey (robert heishman) was
being ganged up on.
several folks replied that heishman was not being ganged up on so
much as that many of the people heishman had posted malicious lies
about were confronting heishman on his lies. it is an ugly situation
that takes away from the newsgroup. i am a big contributor to that
since i comment on heishman's lies often, several times daily many
days. mind you, i don't comment on all of his lies. i don't think any
single human being could do that.
the current status is that many people comment frequently on
heishman's more malicious lies; some even comment on heishman's
meaningless lies.
what should heishman do?
imagine for a moment that heishman actually posts a sincere apology
for one of his lies. (i don't mean the kind of ugly, flame-filled
apologies that he has posted once or twice, but a sincere apology.)
in this hypothetical scenario, heishman apologizes for a lie.
what happens?
many regulars will simply start bashing him for a different lie.
let's say he apologizes for that lie too.
then what happens.
the same thing happens.! many regulars will simply start bashing him
for yet a different lie.
the cycle will repeat itself, over and over. heishman probably
figured this out.
what can he do?
of course, at some point, continuing to bash him for his old lies
will become meaningless and it will stop, unless, of course, he keeps
posting new lies.
What is heishman to do? what can he do?
Well for starters, you are putting yourself in a bad situation with libel
issues.
Instead of whining that people treat you like the lying moron that
you are, maybe you should stop being a lying moron?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: osprey's dilemna |
02 Sep 2007 07:30:41 AM |
|
|
In article <46da4be8$0$14115$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-A579B0.21410801092007@individual.net...
a few days ago, someone commented that osprey (robert heishman) was
being ganged up on.
several folks replied that heishman was not being ganged up on so
much as that many of the people heishman had posted malicious lies
about were confronting heishman on his lies. it is an ugly situation
that takes away from the newsgroup. i am a big contributor to that
since i comment on heishman's lies often, several times daily many
days. mind you, i don't comment on all of his lies. i don't think any
single human being could do that.
the current status is that many people comment frequently on
heishman's more malicious lies; some even comment on heishman's
meaningless lies.
what should heishman do?
imagine for a moment that heishman actually posts a sincere apology
for one of his lies. (i don't mean the kind of ugly, flame-filled
apologies that he has posted once or twice, but a sincere apology.)
in this hypothetical scenario, heishman apologizes for a lie.
what happens?
many regulars will simply start bashing him for a different lie.
let's say he apologizes for that lie too.
then what happens.
the same thing happens.! many regulars will simply start bashing him
for yet a different lie.
the cycle will repeat itself, over and over. heishman probably
figured this out.
what can he do?
of course, at some point, continuing to bash him for his old lies
will become meaningless and it will stop, unless, of course, he keeps
posting new lies.
What is heishman to do? what can he do?
Well for starters, you are putting yourself in a bad situation with libel
issues.
Instead of whining that people treat you like the lying moron that
you are, maybe you should stop being a lying moron?
that's a big part of osprey's dilemna he can't stop being a lying
moron. he can't even stop lying.
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gwenyth Bennet" |
|
| Title: Re: osprey's dilemna |
02 Sep 2007 09:38:44 AM |
|
|
On Sep 2, 7:30 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <46da4be8$0$14115$742ec...@news.sonic.net>,
rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-A579B0.21410801092007@individual.net...
a few days ago, someone commented that osprey (robert heishman) was
being ganged up on.
several folks replied that heishman was not being ganged up on so
much as that many of the people heishman had posted malicious lies
about were confronting heishman on his lies. it is an ugly situation
that takes away from the newsgroup. i am a big contributor to that
since i comment on heishman's lies often, several times daily many
days. mind you, i don't comment on all of his lies. i don't think any
single human being could do that.
the current status is that many people comment frequently on
heishman's more malicious lies; some even comment on heishman's
meaningless lies.
what should heishman do?
imagine for a moment that heishman actually posts a sincere apology
for one of his lies. (i don't mean the kind of ugly, flame-filled
apologies that he has posted once or twice, but a sincere apology.)
in this hypothetical scenario, heishman apologizes for a lie.
what happens?
many regulars will simply start bashing him for a different lie.
let's say he apologizes for that lie too.
then what happens.
the same thing happens.! many regulars will simply start bashing him
for yet a different lie.
the cycle will repeat itself, over and over. heishman probably
figured this out.
what can he do?
of course, at some point, continuing to bash him for his old lies
will become meaningless and it will stop, unless, of course, he keeps
posting new lies.
What is heishman to do? what can he do?
Well for starters, you are putting yourself in a bad situation with libel
issues.
Instead of whining that people treat you like the lying moron that
you are, maybe you should stop being a lying moron?
that's a big part of osprey's dilemna he can't stop being a lying
moron. he can't even stop lying.
It's a compulsion that I believe started once he became preoccupied
with the newsgroups.
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
innews:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gwenyth Bennet" |
|
| Title: Re: osprey's dilemna |
02 Sep 2007 09:34:01 AM |
|
|
On Sep 1, 8:41 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
a few days ago, someone commented that osprey (robert heishman) was
being ganged up on.
several folks replied that heishman was not being ganged up on so
much as that many of the people heishman had posted malicious lies
about were confronting heishman on his lies. it is an ugly situation
that takes away from the newsgroup. i am a big contributor to that
since i comment on heishman's lies often, several times daily many
days. mind you, i don't comment on all of his lies. i don't think any
single human being could do that.
the current status is that many people comment frequently on
heishman's more malicious lies; some even comment on heishman's
meaningless lies.
what should heishman do?
imagine for a moment that heishman actually posts a sincere apology
for one of his lies. (i don't mean the kind of ugly, flame-filled
apologies that he has posted once or twice, but a sincere apology.)
in this hypothetical scenario, heishman apologizes for a lie.
what happens?
many regulars will simply start bashing him for a different lie.
let's say he apologizes for that lie too.
then what happens.
the same thing happens.! many regulars will simply start bashing him
for yet a different lie.
the cycle will repeat itself, over and over. heishman probably
figured this out.
what can he do?
of course, at some point, continuing to bash him for his old lies
will become meaningless and it will stop, unless, of course, he keeps
posting new lies.
What is heishman to do? what can he do?
Leave the newsgroups for awhile until he seeks and receives
professional intervention for his apparent internet (Usenet)
addiction. He's lost touch with reality because of it. His whole life
is centred around the internet to the extreme that worrying about what
we think has become more important than paying attention to his mental
health, and his family.
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
innews:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
This is exactly why he desperately needs professional help.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: osprey's dilemna |
02 Sep 2007 10:46:42 AM |
|
|
On Sep 2, 10:34 am, Gwenyth Bennet <bennetwitho...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 8:41 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
a few days ago, someone commented that osprey (robert heishman) was
being ganged up on.
several folks replied that heishman was not being ganged up on so
much as that many of the people heishman had posted malicious lies
about were confronting heishman on his lies. it is an ugly situation
that takes away from the newsgroup. i am a big contributor to that
since i comment on heishman's lies often, several times daily many
days. mind you, i don't comment on all of his lies. i don't think any
single human being could do that.
the current status is that many people comment frequently on
heishman's more malicious lies; some even comment on heishman's
meaningless lies.
what should heishman do?
imagine for a moment that heishman actually posts a sincere apology
for one of his lies. (i don't mean the kind of ugly, flame-filled
apologies that he has posted once or twice, but a sincere apology.)
in this hypothetical scenario, heishman apologizes for a lie.
what happens?
many regulars will simply start bashing him for a different lie.
let's say he apologizes for that lie too.
then what happens.
the same thing happens.! many regulars will simply start bashing him
for yet a different lie.
the cycle will repeat itself, over and over. heishman probably
figured this out.
what can he do?
of course, at some point, continuing to bash him for his old lies
will become meaningless and it will stop, unless, of course, he keeps
posting new lies.
What is heishman to do? what can he do?
Leave the newsgroups for awhile until he seeks and receives
professional intervention for his apparent internet (Usenet)
addiction. He's lost touch with reality because of it. His whole life
is centred around the internet to the extreme that worrying about what
we think has become more important than paying attention to his mental
health, and his family.
i suggested that to him a few years ago. i don't think osprey can
leave newsgroups. in some ways, he feeds on them as they seem to be
destroying him. it appears that he is seeking that self-destruction.
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
innews:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
This is exactly why he desperately needs professional help.
yes.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
