| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"quibbler" |
| Date: |
05 Mar 2006 07:08:23 PM |
| Object: |
Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like. They
should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies. More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not? I hope that South
Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
05 Mar 2006 09:31:41 PM |
|
|
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e7539751da70e8f98983c@news.readfreenews.net...
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like. They
should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies. More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not? I hope that South
Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
Just a few points to ponder.
1) Why do you favor finance over life? Is a couple of bucks on your tax
return worth more than a few babies?
2) Why should decent folks be forced to pay for what we consider
infanticide?
3) Why do you hate America so much that you would see part of our great
nation impovished and suffering just because they don't agree with you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
06 Mar 2006 08:34:56 AM |
|
|
In article <SsSdneSfJeuzMJbZRVn-qA@giganews.com>,
says...
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e7539751da70e8f98983c@news.readfreenews.net...
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like. They
should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies. More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not? I hope that South
Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
Just a few points to ponder.
1) Why do you favor finance over life?
You can ask yourself the same question. If you pro-liars really care
more about life than anything else then you shouldn't mind losing a few
dollars to support your principles.
Is a couple of bucks on your tax
return worth more than a few babies?
It sounds like you're volunteering to give these benefits up. I'm glad
you've committed to supporting the legislation I'm proposing to deny
federal funds to states that prohibit abortion.
2) Why should decent folks be forced to pay for what we consider
infanticide?
Yet you do pay taxes to support the killing of Iraqis, hypocrite. In any
event, what federal funds currently go to abortion? All I'm saying is
that we also don't want to pay for your decision to force indigent
parents to bring profoundly deformed and retarded children to term, since
you refuse to allow abortion in the case of severe birth defects. If you
want to create wards of the state then you should have to pay for it.
3) Why do you hate America
Oh, I don't hate America, you do. You're the one who wants to force teen
mothers into lives of crushing poverty because you won't allow her to get
an abortion. You're the one who wants to force a woman to bear a
severely retarded deformed or retarded child, forcing her to suffer
severe hardships, not to mention the hardships imposed upon the child.
If Missouri and South Dakota don't want to respect the will of the people
in the result of this country then they can get the ***** out. Rather
than seceding, they need to be ejected, until they come to their senses
and beg to be readmitted.
so much that you would see part of our great
nation impovished and suffering just because they don't agree with you?
It's their poor policy causing the poverty and they adamantly refuse to
make a more intelligent decision. It's a self-inflicted wound and it's
their own fault if they bleed to death from it.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
05 Mar 2006 11:06:14 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e7539751da70e8f98983c@news.readfreenews.net...
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like. They
should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies. More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not? I hope that South
Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
Just a few points to ponder.
1) Why do you favor finance over life? Is a couple of bucks on your tax
return worth more than a few babies?
We all see that you anti-choice extremists care more about forcing
women to obey than you care about savign children if it means spending
some of your own money.
2) Why should decent folks be forced to pay for what we consider
infanticide?
Why should we decent folks pay for your immoral need to make women
suffer and die for what you want? Why should we pay for your slaves?
3) Why do you hate America so much that you would see part of our great
Why do you hate America so much that you want to replace with your
corrupt religious dictatorship?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
05 Mar 2006 11:55:11 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:440bc346$0$58092$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e7539751da70e8f98983c@news.readfreenews.net...
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the
sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like. They
should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies. More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri
forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not? I hope that
South
Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies
of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
Just a few points to ponder.
1) Why do you favor finance over life? Is a couple of bucks on your tax
return worth more than a few babies?
We all see that you anti-choice extremists care more about forcing
women to obey than you care about savign children if it means spending
some of your own money.
2) Why should decent folks be forced to pay for what we consider
infanticide?
The more things change, the more they stay the same....I see that I'm away
for a while, and the stupidity around here still runs rampant.
Here's you a clue, Heishman, since you haven't used any of the others you've
been given. Your statements, 1 and 2, are mutually exclusive, rife with
fallacies, and smack of hypocrisy.
In the first, you are pontificating about "finance over life." In the
second, you start the smarmy "decent folks pay....blah, blah, blah."
First and foremost, why the hell should we, those of us that support a
woman's decision to choose abortion, have to pay for the welfare children
that these laws will inevitably create?
Second, the woman pays for her own abortion. You don't, I don't. With the
laws being written, and with regard to Ray's statements versus yours, you
aren't paying for a fucking thing, which is completely opposite of what you
are trying to claim. On the other hand, "we" will have to pay for the
repercussions after the implementation of this ***** law.
So now, answer your own question: why the ***** should *I* have to pay more
in taxes to support the welfare children that fuckwits like you are forcing
onto society?
I would patiently await your answer, but I can already smell the stench of
the ***** it will certainly contain. Not to mention that you are still
killfiled.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
-Mr. Worf, set phasers on "***** You" and fire at will. -Doc Smartass
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
05 Mar 2006 08:36:19 PM |
|
|
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e7539751da70e8f98983c@news.readfreenews.net...
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like.
Asinine.
They should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies.
More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not?
Read the law that dictates those payments.
I hope that South Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World
hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
Au Contraire. From the looks of Moslem propagation South Dakotans and
Missourians will spread into other states as they outnumber the Pro-Choice
states.
Ain't it nifty abortion on demand is proven to be a failure?
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
05 Mar 2006 08:59:55 PM |
|
|
In article <IbNOf.1508$s8.1098@bignews7.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e7539751da70e8f98983c@news.readfreenews.net...
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like.
Asinine.
You certainly are, and we're tired of putting up with you worthless
throwbacks.
They should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies.
More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not?
Read the law that dictates those payments.
The majority of the US supports abortion and they will not allow mooching
fundamentalist dumbasses like yourself to try to get a free ride on the
public dime.
I hope that South Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World
hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
Au Contraire. From the looks of Moslem propagation
so you're admitting that you're in cahoots with taliban muslims?
South Dakotans and
Missourians will spread into other states as they outnumber the Pro-Choice
states.
Nope. We will deny they any funding if their birth certificate is from
south dakota or missouri, *****.
Ain't it nifty abortion on demand is proven to be a failure?
There are 50 million abortions every year. It's quite successful at
controlling and preventing the birth of human detritus like yourself.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
06 Mar 2006 08:07:47 AM |
|
|
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e755393f8b1a9b698983d@news.readfreenews.net...
In article <IbNOf.1508$s8.1098@bignews7.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e7539751da70e8f98983c@news.readfreenews.net...
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the
sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like.
Asinine.
You certainly are, and we're tired of putting up with you worthless
throwbacks.
They should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies.
More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri
forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not?
Read the law that dictates those payments.
The majority of the US supports abortion and they will not allow mooching
fundamentalist dumbasses like yourself to try to get a free ride on the
public dime.
I hope that South Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World
hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies
of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
Au Contraire. From the looks of Moslem propagation
so you're admitting that you're in cahoots with taliban muslims?
South Dakotans and
Missourians will spread into other states as they outnumber the
Pro-Choice
states.
Nope. We will deny they any funding if their birth certificate is from
south dakota or missouri, *****.
Federal and State statutes trump you.
Ain't it nifty abortion on demand is proven to be a failure?
There are 50 million abortions every year. It's quite successful at
controlling and preventing the birth of human detritus like yourself.
It didn't though.
Loser!
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
06 Mar 2006 08:40:47 AM |
|
|
In article <XjXOf.18245$f6.4566@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Federal and State statutes trump you.
Wrong *****. The proposed state law is widely believed to be
unconstitutional and even the current packed supreme court would not
uphold it.
There are 50 million abortions every year. It's quite successful at
controlling and preventing the birth of human detritus like yourself.
It didn't though.
LOL. So you admit that you are detritus, though. The process isn't
perfect, but if you report to your nearest hospital they'll probably take
pity on you and euthanize you.
Loser!
You certainly are.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
06 Mar 2006 10:06:09 AM |
|
|
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e75f7d841cd5be7989842@news.readfreenews.net...
In article <XjXOf.18245$f6.4566@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Federal and State statutes trump you.
Wrong *****. The proposed state law is widely believed to be
unconstitutional and even the current packed supreme court would not
uphold it.
The current welfare law is not unconstitutional yet though.
There are 50 million abortions every year. It's quite successful at
controlling and preventing the birth of human detritus like yourself.
It didn't though.
LOL. So you admit that you are detritus, though.
Maybe to you, because that is how you perceive me.
Know the saying, "Let the deceived mind continue being deceived."?
Not my problem.
The process isn't perfect, but if you report to your nearest hospital
they'll probably take
pity on you and euthanize you.
What pity, moron?
Who is asking you for pity, scumbag?
Loser!
You certainly are.
I never lost a child to abortion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
06 Mar 2006 04:07:15 PM |
|
|
In article <W2ZOf.18296$f6.5543@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e75f7d841cd5be7989842@news.readfreenews.net...
In article <XjXOf.18245$f6.4566@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Federal and State statutes trump you.
Wrong *****. The proposed state law is widely believed to be
unconstitutional and even the current packed supreme court would not
uphold it.
The current welfare law is not unconstitutional yet though.
There are 50 million abortions every year. It's quite successful at
controlling and preventing the birth of human detritus like yourself.
It didn't though.
LOL. So you admit that you are detritus, though.
Maybe to you, because that is how you perceive me.
Because that's what you are.
Know the saying, "Let the deceived mind continue being deceived."?
Sounds like a pretty idiotic policy. I'm not surprised you'd endorse it.
Not my problem.
Actually, you are the problem, *****.
The process isn't perfect, but if you report to your nearest hospital
they'll probably take
pity on you and euthanize you.
What pity, moron?
The pity that your worthless existence inspires in others. Work on your
reading comprehension next time, fool.
Who is asking you for pity,
You don't have to ask for it, *****. You're just so pathetic that
some people, myself not included, are bound to pity you.
Loser!
You certainly are.
I never lost a child to abortion.
You're the one who needs to be aborted.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
06 Mar 2006 04:56:36 PM |
|
|
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e766082fa56c70c989844@news.readfreenews.net...
In article <W2ZOf.18296$f6.5543@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e75f7d841cd5be7989842@news.readfreenews.net...
In article <XjXOf.18245$f6.4566@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Federal and State statutes trump you.
Wrong *****. The proposed state law is widely believed to be
unconstitutional and even the current packed supreme court would not
uphold it.
The current welfare law is not unconstitutional yet though.
There are 50 million abortions every year. It's quite successful at
controlling and preventing the birth of human detritus like
yourself.
It didn't though.
LOL. So you admit that you are detritus, though.
Maybe to you, because that is how you perceive me.
Because that's what you are.
Know the saying, "Let the deceived mind continue being deceived."?
Sounds like a pretty idiotic policy. I'm not surprised you'd endorse it.
Not my problem.
Actually, you are the problem, *****.
You call yourself qubller and think I am the problem?
LOL!
Try some silence and see what happens.
The process isn't perfect, but if you report to your nearest hospital
they'll probably take
pity on you and euthanize you.
What pity, moron?
The pity that your worthless existence inspires in others.
What pity is that?
Work on your
reading comprehension next time, fool.
You think I did not comprehend your message?
Who is asking you for pity,
You don't have to ask for it, *****.
I didn't.
You're just so pathetic that
some people, myself not included, are bound to pity you.
Good that you are not bound to pity me, according to you.
I lose no comfort or sleep knowing that.
Loser!
You certainly are.
I never lost a child to abortion.
You're the one who needs to be aborted.
You are really feeling it now, huh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
06 Mar 2006 08:43:52 PM |
|
|
In article <M33Pf.41204$Ly6.21466@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Actually, you are the problem, *****.
You call yourself qubller and think I am the problem?
What did you steal a dictionary or something? I'm sure they'll have your
picture listed under "moron". Anyway, it's more than a little sad when
you try to slam me, but can't even spell a simple word.
LOL!
Drooling idiots like yourself often laugh for no reason, it seems.
Try some silence and see what happens.
The written word doesn't require sound, you fool, expect maybe in your
case, since you still can't read without moving your lips.
The process isn't perfect, but if you report to your nearest hospital
they'll probably take
pity on you and euthanize you.
What pity, moron?
The pity that your worthless existence inspires in others.
What pity is that?
Pay attention, dipshit. You are *pitiful*. I suspect that many people
pity the fact that you're still breathing.
Work on your
reading comprehension next time, fool.
You think I did not comprehend your message?
It's quite clear that your reading comprehension is deficient, as your
replies are so often irrelevant and nonsensical.
Who is asking you for pity,
You don't have to ask for it, *****.
I didn't.
Irrelevant, you nitwit.
You're just so pathetic that
some people, myself not included, are bound to pity you.
Good that you are not bound to pity me, according to you.
I'm glad you agree that you don't even deserve pity, despite your pitiful
state.
I lose no comfort or sleep knowing that.
I don't really give a ***** whether you do or not. In the future, don't
bother to volunteer information that neither I nor anyone else cares to
see.
You are really feeling it now, huh?
Try to make sense next time, jackass.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
06 Mar 2006 01:15:43 AM |
|
|
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like. They
should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies. More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not? I hope that South
Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
I think that's an excellent suggestion.
---
Domino's Pizza: "Ketchup on burnt cardboard sprinkled with bacon bits
is not by any stretch of the imagination a culinary delight." -- Tag Heuer
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "KenStahl" |
|
| Title: Re: Outlaw Abortion and Lose Federal Funds |
05 Mar 2006 09:05:41 PM |
|
|
quibbler wrote:
If dumb ***** motherfuckers in South Dakota or Missouri want the sovereign
right to outlaw abortion on the state level then they should not expect
financial support from the Federal government in the form of Aid to
Families with Dependent Children, Child Tax Credits and the like. They
should reap the consequences of their backward economic policies. More
importantly, why should the rest of the American tax payers have to
provide welfare to support the kids that south dakota and missouri forced
mothers to have, whether they could afford them or not? I hope that South
Dakota and Missouri become overpopulated, Third World hell holes. If
they're going to act like stupid animals by rejecting the technologies of
family planning then they deserve to be dirt sucking poor.
You really don't have to worry. It is a symbolic action
meant to force a new opinion from the Supreme Court and will
be overturned there. Despite the recent changes in the
Supreme Court, that body has no real interest in changing
something that has been broadly accepted by just a few
people on the fringes of society. The legislators in South
Dakota and Montana crave attention and they are using this
issue to get that attention because they have nothing else
going on in their states.
--
Blogging at http://HexagonalPeg.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
