| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Sam" |
| Date: |
15 Jul 2003 06:38:46 AM |
| Object: |
Pictures of Babies in the Womb |
Here are pictures of babies in the womb (courtesy of GE Medical
Systems) and from the MSNBC News website. You can see that these
babies are not pieces of worthless garbage but are precious human
beings.
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
.
|
|
| User: "John J. Piotrowski" |
|
| Title: Re: Pictures of Babies in the Womb |
13 Sep 2003 07:18:53 AM |
|
|
--------------040902050309030008000203
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I reiterate here again. With some and the truth I say.
The mind of the bigot is like the pupil of the EYE the more light you
throw on it the smaller it gets.
Regards
Jack
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <5b6a2e7d.0307150338.37ab07c@posting.google.com>, sa836284
@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu says...
Subject: Pictures of Babies in the Womb
From: (Sam)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion, soc.women, us.issues.abortion
Here are pictures of babies in the womb
No babies live in people's wombs.
Stop telling lies.
--------------040902050309030008000203
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
I reiterate here again. With some and the truth I say.<br>
<br>
The mind of the bigot is like the pupil of the EYE the more light you throw
on it the smaller it gets.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Jack<br>
<br>
Pat Winstanley wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midMPG.197e23a0b8fde45e98a4a2@News.CIS.DFN.DE">
<pre wrap="">In article <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:5b6a2e7d.0307150338.37ab07c@posting.google.com"><5b6a2e7d.0307150338.37ab07c@posting.google.com></a>, sa836284
@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu says...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Subject: Pictures of Babies in the Womb
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:"></a> (Sam)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion, soc.women, us.issues.abortion
Here are pictures of babies in the womb
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
No babies live in people's wombs.
Stop telling lies.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------040902050309030008000203--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam" |
|
| Title: Baby Pictures in the Womb Restored |
17 Jul 2003 05:44:32 PM |
|
|
Here are the pictures of babies in the womb restored (courtesy of GE
Medical Systems) from the MSNBC News website. Many supporters of
abortion want to hide pictures of babies in the womb from being seen.
I believe that they should be seen on national television. The
pro-abortion movement wants to hide the truth.
Many seem to want to fight against the mother knowing that the baby in
her womb is not just a clump of tissues but look like what the link
shows. The truth should be more widely known.
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
Here are pictures of babies in the womb (courtesy of GE Medical
Systems) and from the MSNBC News website. You can see that these
babies are not pieces of worthless garbage but are precious human
beings.
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Baby Pictures in the Womb ... don't exist |
18 Jul 2003 01:31:10 AM |
|
|
In article <5b6a2e7d.0307171444.7ca5b673@posting.google.com>, sa836284
@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu says...
Subject: Baby Pictures in the Womb Restored
From: (Sam)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion, soc.women, us.issues.abortion
Here are the pictures of babies in the womb
No babies exist in any wombs.
If you are misrepresenting what the site claims you are lying.
If the site is pretending to show pictures of babies in wombs then the
site is lying.
Either way you are a fool to so blatantly (and repeatedly) either lie or
support a lie.
So which are you? A liar yourself, or aiding and abetting other liarts
like yourself in this instance.
(We already know you are a liar since most postings you make contain
claims by you which are clearly untrue... AND you are not making those
claims in ignorance since you have already (repeatedly) been informed
why those claims were false).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam" |
|
| Title: Re: Baby Pictures in the Womb ... don't exist |
18 Jul 2003 09:29:35 AM |
|
|
Here is the link of baby pictures in the womb restored that Pat seems
to want to hide. Are you afraid, Pat, that people will see the
pictures for themselves and come to a different conclusion than you?
Is that why you keep cutting the link?
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
Here are the pictures of babies in the womb restored (courtesy of GE
Medical Systems) from the MSNBC News website. Many supporters of
abortion want to hide pictures of babies in the womb from being seen.
I believe that they should be seen on national television. The
pro-abortion movement wants to hide the truth.
Many seem to want to fight against the mother knowing that the baby in
her womb is not just a clump of tissues but look like what the link
shows. The truth should be more widely known.
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
.
|
|
|
| User: "thisisme" |
|
| Title: Re: Baby Pictures in the Womb ... don't exist |
22 Jul 2003 07:23:18 AM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3f201b43.2302132@netnews.mchsi.com>...
<bullcrap-snip>
-- Craig Chilton
If bullcrap snips were the norm, there's be nothing left of your posts.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Baby Pictures in the Womb ... don't exist |
27 Jul 2003 07:16:55 PM |
|
|
On 22 Jul 2003 05:23:18 -0700,
Moronic-Anoymous Coward "this is me"
<thisisme374@hotmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
On 18 Jul 2003 07:29:35 -0700,
Sam <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> wrote:
Here is the link ... restored that Pat seems to want to hide.
Are you afraid, Pat, that people will see [it] and come to a different
conclusion than you? Is that why you keep cutting the link?
<snip of hate-propaganda link>
She didn't "cut" any links.
It's obvious that she simply saw no good reason to INCLUDE links
to hate-based, lying, and propagandistic BULLCRAP.
Any more than I do.
What a person chooses to include in a post is the poster's own
business.
Post LIES and hate-bullcrap in YOUR posts to your heart's content,
Sam. That's just about ALL that you do, since you're a bigoted idiot.
No one will touch them. No one CAN touch them.
But don't EXPECT people having any common sense or brains in
their heads to REPEAT your propagandistic lies for you.
<bullcrap-snip>
If bullcrap snips were the norm, there's be nothing left of
your posts.
Very TRUE!!
Any snips made to any writing that *I* have done in my posts (not
necessarily including quotes from others) WOULD be an act of
bullcrappishness on the part of the person doing the snipping. Except
when done as a clear case of responding only to one PART of my post.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
The only things that such hyperconservative louts as RRR cultists,
homophobes, and Anti-Choicers (usually the SAME people) lack are:
-- Compassion
-- Common sense
-- Intelligence
-- Fairness
-- Capability to NOT be busybodies
-- Tolerance
-- Acceptance of the rights of those with whom they disagree
Otherwise, there's not TOO much else wrong with them.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam" |
|
| Title: Baby Pictures Being Hidden |
22 Jul 2003 06:58:45 AM |
|
|
Here is the link ... restored that Pat seems to want to hide.
Are you afraid, Pat, that people will see [it] and come to a different
conclusion than you? Is that why you keep cutting the link?
Craig says:
<snip of hate-propaganda link>
She didn't "cut" any links.
It's obvious that she simply saw no good reason to INCLUDE links
to hate-based, lying, and propagandistic BULLCRAP.
Any more than I do.
The link comes from MSNBC News and the pictures are from GE Medical
Systems.
What a person chooses to include in a post is the poster's own
business.
I'll concede that point with you. It is your own business what you
want to include in your posts. However, cutting the link of the
pictures of babies in womb seem to show that you all want to prevent
people from seeing them. You all seem to want to hide the babies in
the womb from being seen.
Post LIES and hate-bullcrap in YOUR posts to your heart's content,
Sam. That's just about ALL that you do, since you're a bigoted idiot.
There you are with your bigotry. Do you realize how much you act like
a raving lunatic? Maybe people would respect you more if you acted
more civilized. I have repect for people who can discuss this in a
civilized manner. When you act like a raving lunatic you are being
bigoted. There are people on both sides who act like raving lunatics.
When someone acts like a raving lunatic then people tend to not take
him/her seriously.
No one will touch them. No one CAN touch them.
But don't EXPECT people having any common sense or brains in
their heads to REPEAT your propagandistic lies for you.
Here is my post restored as well as the news link.
Here is the link of baby pictures in the womb restored that Pat seems
to want to hide. Are you afraid, Pat, that people will see the
pictures for themselves and come to a different conclusion than you?
Is that why you keep cutting the link?
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
Here are the pictures of babies in the womb restored (courtesy of GE
Medical Systems) from the MSNBC News website. Many supporters of
abortion want to hide pictures of babies in the womb from being seen.
I believe that they should be seen on national television. The
pro-abortion movement wants to hide the truth.
Many seem to want to fight against the mother knowing that the baby in
her womb is not just a clump of tissues but look like what the link
shows. The truth should be more widely known.
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
.
|
|
|
| User: "M is for Malapert" |
|
| Title: Re: Baby Pictures Being Hidden |
22 Jul 2003 09:53:15 AM |
|
|
"Sam" <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> wrote in message
news:5b6a2e7d.0307220358.6f92068e@posting.google.com...
Many seem to want to fight against the mother knowing that the baby in
her womb is not just a clump of tissues but look like what the link
shows. The truth should be more widely known.
Who *hasn't*, in the last 40+ years, seen pictures of "babies in the womb"?
If you have TV, subscribe to magazines, or even go to the supermarket, you
can't have missed them. There's nothing different about these except that
the fetuses are alive, but then most people don't know that those Miracle of
Life, A Child Is Born pictures are of dead, aborted fetuses anyway.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Baby Pictures Being Hidden |
22 Jul 2003 09:09:34 PM |
|
|
In article <5b6a2e7d.0307220358.6f92068e@posting.google.com>, sa836284
@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu says...
Subject: Baby Pictures Being Hidden
From: (Sam)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion, soc.women, us.issues.abortion
Here is the link ... restored that Pat seems to want to hide.
Are you afraid, Pat, that people will see [it] and come to a different
conclusion than you? Is that why you keep cutting the link?
Craig says:
<snip of hate-propaganda link>
She didn't "cut" any links.
It's obvious that she simply saw no good reason to INCLUDE links
to hate-based, lying, and propagandistic BULLCRAP.
Any more than I do.
The link comes from MSNBC News and the pictures are from GE Medical
Systems.
.... and does not show any babies in wombs (which is what you claimed it
shows).
Why should anyone propagate your lies?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Baby Pictures in the Womb ... don't exist |
18 Jul 2003 11:46:37 AM |
|
|
In article <5b6a2e7d.0307180629.74f6f722@posting.google.com>, sa836284
@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu says...
Subject: Re: Baby Pictures in the Womb ... don't exist
From: (Sam)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion, soc.women, us.issues.abortion
Here is the link of baby pictures in the womb
It is impossible to picture any baby in a womb since there are no babies
in wombs.
Stop telling lies!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Baby Pictures in the Womb Restored |
17 Jul 2003 09:48:49 PM |
|
|
Seen it.
Got any of women dying in childbirth? THAT would be new and exciting.
Sam <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> wrote in message
news:5b6a2e7d.0307171444.7ca5b673@posting.google.com...
Here are the pictures of babies in the womb restored (courtesy of GE
Medical Systems) from the MSNBC News website. Many supporters of
abortion want to hide pictures of babies in the womb from being seen.
I believe that they should be seen on national television. The
pro-abortion movement wants to hide the truth.
Many seem to want to fight against the mother knowing that the baby in
her womb is not just a clump of tissues but look like what the link
shows. The truth should be more widely known.
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
Here are pictures of babies in the womb (courtesy of GE Medical
Systems) and from the MSNBC News website. You can see that these
babies are not pieces of worthless garbage but are precious human
beings.
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John J. Piotrowski" |
|
| Title: Re: Pictures of Babies in the Womb |
22 Jul 2003 06:42:23 AM |
|
|
It's a shame that all or at least most of these answers attack the
author. I went to the url address and found nothing objectional. All the
pictures were of the growth of a human being in it's stages of prebirth.
How can anybody call that a lie?
Regards
Jack
Sam wrote:
Here are pictures of babies in the womb (courtesy of GE Medical
Systems) and from the MSNBC News website. You can see that these
babies are not pieces of worthless garbage but are precious human
beings.
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Pictures of Babies in the Womb |
15 Jul 2003 06:58:11 AM |
|
|
On 15 Jul 2003 04:38:46 -0700,
Sam <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> wrote:
[ ... ]
...these [fetuses] are ... precious human beings.
"Precious" human beings.
ROTFL!!!!!
Yep. EVERY BIT as "precious" as are the gametes (Stage ONE
of the reproductive process) that are willfully aborted at the rate of a
*quadrillion* every DAY, worldwide, while Anti-Choice HYPOCRITES
look the other way.
No more, and no less, "precious" than THOSE, loon!
Keep majoring in IGNORANCE, Sam. You'll get your Ph.D. in it
any day now.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Pictures of Babies in the Womb |
15 Jul 2003 09:38:31 PM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <5b6a2e7d.0307150338.37ab07c@posting.google.com>, sa836284
@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu says...
Subject: Pictures of Babies in the Womb
From: (Sam)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion, soc.women, us.issues.abortion
Here are pictures of babies in the womb
No babies live in people's wombs.
Stop telling lies.
Good argument, cynical pro-abortion loser.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Pictures of Babies in the Womb |
15 Jul 2003 11:29:38 PM |
|
|
<no@spam.com> wrote in message news:3F14BAA7.3B69DA19@spam.com...
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <5b6a2e7d.0307150338.37ab07c@posting.google.com>, sa836284
@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu says...
Subject: Pictures of Babies in the Womb
From: (Sam)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion, soc.women, us.issues.abortion
Here are pictures of babies in the womb
No babies live in people's wombs.
Stop telling lies.
Good argument, cynical pro-abortion loser.
Lying, woman hating, anti-choice sack of *****.
Two can play the name game.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Pictures of Babies in the Womb |
15 Jul 2003 10:21:35 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:38:31 +1200,
Anonymous Loser <no@spam.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
"Sam" <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu>
ignorantly claimed...
Here are pictures of babies in the womb.
No babies live in people's wombs.
Stop telling lies.
Good argument, cynical pro-abortion loser.
It was all the argument that she needed to employ against Sam.
Sam claimed that babies were in wombs -- and NO baby has EVER
been in a womb. Since ALL babies have ben BORN. Embtyoes and
fetuses, sye, but NO babies. So Sam lied. And Pat called him on it.
There ARE "losers" out and about, but they are vastly in the minority;
incredibly hateful and ignorant: ANTI-Choicers.
You know -- losers like YOU.
-- Craig Chilton
~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~
On Those Who Post ANONYMOUSLY...
"As for posting anonymously, it makes no difference
whether a FAIR-MINDED person who is opposed to a hateful
agenda (Anti-Choice) posts anonymously or not, since
he/she has NOTHING to be ASHAMED of in the first place,
when putting up such posts. The only anonymous COWARDS
are those who spew shameful hate and repression, while
hiding behind an alias in the process... just like a
Ku Klux Klansman who cravenly hides his face under a hood."
~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Pictures of Babies in the Womb |
15 Jul 2003 01:10:17 PM |
|
|
Sam <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> wrote:
Here are pictures of babies in the womb (courtesy of GE Medical
Systems) and from the MSNBC News website.
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic makes the woman completely
invisible, worth no more consideration for her wishes than if she
was a machine.
Systems) and from the MSNBC News website. You can see that these
babies are not pieces of worthless garbage
Unlike the woman.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
