"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148571541.491174.13500@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148570479.514003.183570@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
If the morning after pill is made available OTC without a prescription
and
without requiring identification of every woman who purchases it, then
the
right to privacy is ensured much better.
This is funny as hell, especially coming from Johnny who insists that
private medical records should simply be handed over to government
officials so that they may go on a wild goose chase looking for crimes.
I don't see a big problem with legal investigations.
No one does, but the actions you've supported in the past AREN'T legal.
Also, NARAL, and the NAF, and Planned Parenthood or any physician
would
no
longer be privy to the identifying information of the women who use
such
medications.
I am sure there are many women and men who are sick of so many people
they
aren't even related to knowing their personal business.
So long as they aren't medical records, eh Johnny
Can you say conflict of interest?
Can you say anti-trust?
Can you say right to privacy?
I can. But seeing someone like you actually support it when your past
actions indicate you want privacy laws violated, I simply couldn't let
the opportunity to point out your hypocrisy slip by.
Hypocrite?
You are against womens' right to privacy now?
Nope, I say make the pill over-the-counter. I have no problem with
that. I was merely pointing out your hypocrisy.
I do not see myself as a hypocrite in this.
As for those who are
content to play the game of the oligopolistic abortion regime, who
cares?
The right to privacy is what they like to present so much, so when
will
they
actually practice it?
When do you plan to start practicing it, hypocrite?
Me?
Right to privacy is what is screeched so much, why do you think they who
arent practicing it are somehow unhypocritical?
When you scream to violate people's privacy but then turn and support
it, that's HYPOCRITICAL, buttfuck.
You think?
The Constitution specifically dictates that rights may be violated with just
cause.
You really think a woman needs a prescription every time she needs these
medications?
Nope, I say make these OTC...
Can you say increased health care costs?
Nope, make them OTC as suggested.
Maybe that will happen. If there is no law made to outlaw some of the things
that are currently in effect there doesn't seem to be a better way to
fulfill the right to privacy, correct?
Now, let's see how many idiots come out to defend the oligopolistic
secrecy
clan.
I would go one step further and present the anti-trust nature of the
current
oligopolistic management of the abortion on demand industry.
.
