Pope and abortion



 Science > Abortion > Pope and abortion

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 42 of 46

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 

18

 

19

 

20

 

21

 

22

 

23

 

24

 

25

 

26

 

27

 

28

 

29

 

30

 

31

 

32

 

33

 

34

 

35

 

36

 

37

 

38

 

39

 

40

 

41

 

42

 

43

 

44

 

45

 

46

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Cracklin"
Date: 26 Jul 2005 01:15:13 PM
Object: Pope and abortion
Pope Pius IX in 1869 extended punishment of excommunication for the
abortion of an embryo at any age. In 1951, Pius XII restated the
principle, saying: “Every human being, even the child in the mother’s
womb, receives its right to life directly from God, not from its
parents.” Speaking in Kenya in 1985, John Paul II bluntly declared:
“Actions such as contraception and abortion are wrong.”
Many Catholics today, however, maintain that such an attitude is out of
date and must be revised. As a result, Roman Catholics are divided over
the issue.
.

User: "Johnny"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 30 Jul 2005 01:04:44 PM
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dcgf6n$k5b$1@bolt.sonic.net...

Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in news:OwLGe.19422$h.540

"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message


news:0dtme1terc9ifs2mol3eo5tf3i9l10pnvb@4ax.com...

Nobody is murdering children, so stop lying.


Abortion doctors are paid nothing?


you demonstrated your insanity again.


Abortion doctors are paid nothing?
Stop trying to deceive people.


Stop being a dishonest nutcase. Money

What aboriotn doctors are piad.

and murder

What abortion doctors do.

are two different
things.

Duh!
.
User: "Jim07D5"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 30 Jul 2005 01:21:25 PM
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> said:
<...>

and murder


What abortion doctors do.

Does calling it murder mean that you would for making abortion illegal
in cases of incest, rape, and where the mother's life is likely to be
lost in childbirth? Would you want the death sentence used against the
woman and the doctor? If not, then what do you mean? I'm just curious
about what people who use that word mean by it. I don't plan to argue
with you.
Jim07D5
.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 30 Jul 2005 01:35:25 PM
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message

Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in news:OwLGe.19422$h.540

"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message


news:0dtme1terc9ifs2mol3eo5tf3i9l10pnvb@4ax.com...

Nobody is murdering children, so stop lying.


Abortion doctors are paid nothing?


you demonstrated your insanity again.


Abortion doctors are paid nothing?
Stop trying to deceive people.


Stop being a dishonest nutcase. Money


What aboriotn doctors are piad.

What you are paid.

and murder


What abortion doctors do.

You are a liar.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 30 Jul 2005 03:35:16 PM
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:04:44 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<VhPGe.18419$Ie1.17568@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:


"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dcgf6n$k5b$1@bolt.sonic.net...

Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in news:OwLGe.19422$h.540

"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message


news:0dtme1terc9ifs2mol3eo5tf3i9l10pnvb@4ax.com...

Nobody is murdering children, so stop lying.


Abortion doctors are paid nothing?


you demonstrated your insanity again.


Abortion doctors are paid nothing?
Stop trying to deceive people.


Stop being a dishonest nutcase. Money


What aboriotn doctors are piad.

What everyone is paid for the work they do.


and murder


What abortion doctors do.

No. Abortion is not and never has been murder.


are two different
things.


Duh!

.


User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 30 Jul 2005 03:24:45 PM
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:47:33 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<OwLGe.19422$h.540@bignews6.bellsouth.net> wrote:


"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:0dtme1terc9ifs2mol3eo5tf3i9l10pnvb@4ax.com...

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:37:18 -0400, Michael The Archangel
<defender@cath.org> wrote:

+ My main complaint is that my tax money should never be put towards
the abortion of some child. Since I don't believe in murdering
children, states shouldn't pay for abortions for welfare mothers. To
me, this is wrong. Just as it is wrong to subsidize welfare mothers
from purchasing liquor and cigarettes with welfare money. If they
wish to indulge in such sinful activities, they should pay for it with
money they earn themselves. And, you will find that many states
agreed with these thoughts.


Nobody is murdering children, so stop lying.


Abortion doctors are paid nothing?

That has nothing to do with the fat that abortion is not murder. You
once demonstrate you are an idiot.

Stop trying to deceive people.
Your personal life is no reason to cause others to live in denial.

And the remainder proves you a fool as well.
.

User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 05:04:50 PM
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:38:04 -0400, Michael The Archangel
<defender@cath.org> in alt.abortion with message-id
<o78le1tt8h81mdlvn560pol95oac32g7u4@4ax.com> wrote:

Cracklin' \(Pro Choice\)" <jehovah@witness.net> wrote:

The *people* are not the ones with an unwanted pregnancy - the women who
needs to choose is. And SHE comes first no matter how you despise women and
want to control them.


+ This country has a constitution that offers all people the rights to
life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

No, it doesn't.


+ It will be within my lifetime that we will see pro-choice limited
to the first trimester, with doctor's permission. A woman
doctor -- if you feel a woman MUST be involved.

You must expect to live several hundred years.
.

User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 28 Jul 2005 08:53:42 PM
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<RUeGe.10124$8g5.8980@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:


"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:363ie1t12f6je50h6h0toik19q02mmh7nb@4ax.com...

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:32:43 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<8%5Ge.7936$8g5.3814@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:


"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e820d5$0$16587$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:pLxFe.4202$Ie1.259@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.

==================
It does. It gives woman the CHOICE... that's the law. :-)


It does not dictate an abortion in any pregnancy.
Choice is not sufficient for all the people of this society.


Why?


If you do not understand, why ask?
One reason is because Choice does not represent the will of the people
adequately.

Of course it does. If a woman does not want an abortion she is free
not to get one.
.

User: "Darklady"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 28 Jul 2005 09:36:52 PM
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:


"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:363ie1t12f6je50h6h0toik19q02mmh7nb@4ax.com...

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:32:43 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<8%5Ge.7936$8g5.3814@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:


"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e820d5$0$16587$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:pLxFe.4202$Ie1.259@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.

==================
It does. It gives woman the CHOICE... that's the law. :-)


It does not dictate an abortion in any pregnancy.
Choice is not sufficient for all the people of this society.


Why?


If you do not understand, why ask?
One reason is because Choice does not represent the will of the people
adequately.

Actually, polls continually show that while not all Americans
support abortion, particularly later in pregnancy, they do support
choice.

-- Darklady
www.darklady.com
www.masturbate-a-thon.org
.
User: "JimR"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 07:47:12 AM
"Darklady" <darklady@darklady.com> wrote in message


Actually, polls continually show that while not all Americans
support abortion, particularly later in pregnancy, they do support
choice.

I certainly do. But I think it would be a lot better if all those horny
fukkers out there would exercise the slightest bit of adult intelligence and
use birth control. Jesus, it is so readily available that it seems a crime
to not use *something*. What is the big deal--why does everyone seem to
focus on pregnancy termination rather than prevention?
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 10:07:26 AM
JimR <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:

"Darklady" <darklady@darklady.com> wrote in message


Actually, polls continually show that while not all Americans
support abortion, particularly later in pregnancy, they do support
choice.


I certainly do. But I think it would be a lot better if all those horny
fukkers out there would exercise the slightest bit of adult intelligence and
use birth control. Jesus, it is so readily available that it seems a crime
to not use *something*. What is the big deal--why does everyone seem to
focus on pregnancy termination rather than prevention?

Because the anti-abortion agenda is all about punishing sex. The goal
is to prevent sex and not just prevent pregnancy.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 12:47:26 PM
"Gay Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Are you ever going to stop posting your DNC propaganda?
How much do your masters at the DNC pay you anyway?
.
User: "Sneekers"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 03:40:16 PM
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:47:26 GMT, "Sir Marksman" <noneya@youwish.com>
wrote:

"Gay Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message

Who's he?
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 03:55:01 PM
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:815le1lapc6dq857bdbvs6smvvsp2un3j0@4ax.com...

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:47:26 GMT, "Sir Marksman" <noneya@youwish.com>
wrote:

"Gay Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message


Who's he?

Your mother.
.




User: "Natalie Clifford Barney"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 10:33:13 AM
JimR wrote:

"Darklady" <darklady@darklady.com> wrote in message


Actually, polls continually show that while not all Americans
support abortion, particularly later in pregnancy, they do support
choice.


I certainly do. But I think it would be a lot better if all those horny
fukkers out there would exercise the slightest bit of adult intelligence and
use birth control. Jesus, it is so readily available that it seems a crime
to not use *something*. What is the big deal--why does everyone seem to
focus on pregnancy termination rather than prevention?

Availability of birth control in certain rural areas is limited by the
pharmacists "morals" in the same fashion that congress now holds up the HPV
vaccine.
Jim, women's bodies and the issues surrounding them are the province of women.
Men ought not arrogate to themselves the power to make our decisions.
Natalie Clifford Barney
Le membre de L' Academie des Femmes
One of the Lesbian Immortals of the Left Bank
We never die....
"If too little of the love I invoke appears in this book, it is because I have
better spent it elsewhere. Here there remain only fragments."
.
User: "JimR"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 01:59:22 PM
"Natalie Clifford Barney" <SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote in message
news:42EA4C32.7B2F4CB5@20RueJacob.fr...



JimR wrote:

"Darklady" <darklady@darklady.com> wrote in message


Actually, polls continually show that while not all Americans
support abortion, particularly later in pregnancy, they do support
choice.


I certainly do. But I think it would be a lot better if all those horny
fukkers out there would exercise the slightest bit of adult intelligence
and
use birth control. Jesus, it is so readily available that it seems a
crime
to not use *something*. What is the big deal--why does everyone seem to
focus on pregnancy termination rather than prevention?


Availability of birth control in certain rural areas is limited by the
pharmacists "morals" in the same fashion that congress now holds up the
HPV
vaccine.

Jim, women's bodies and the issues surrounding them are the province of
women.
Men ought not arrogate to themselves the power to make our decisions.

That does not address the problem that *some* women create for themselves,
by failing to take more responsibility when they have sex. Even if we set
aside those women in areas where contraception may be difficult to obtain,
how do you explain why so many of them *allow* themselves to get pregnant in
urban areas? Jeez, here in Philly one can get all sorts of things,
virtually anywhere, over the counter, at places like 7-11. Pharmacies are
plentiful. Hospitals, clinics and private physicians are everywhere here.
So what is the reason for all these unplanned pregnancies?
If I were a woman, I'd just do what I had to do to get and use the
contraception I needed. End of story. No tears, no scenes.
Doesn't anybody believe in being the slightest bit responsible these days?
What is such a big deal about acting like an adult, rather than a silly
child? And why all this sympathy toward those morons that acted
irresponsibly?
Maybe the problem is that someone ought to tell them to grow the hell up,
because in those areas where contraceptives are readily available, there is
just no reason for large numbers of women to allow themselves to get
pregnant if they *really* don't want to.
It doesn't resolve the abortion debate, to be sure, but things would be
better is some people would just, plain, "grow-the-hell-up!"
.
User: "Mark Sebree"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 02:30:05 PM
JimR wrote:

"Natalie Clifford Barney" <SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote in message
news:42EA4C32.7B2F4CB5@20RueJacob.fr...



JimR wrote:

"Darklady" <darklady@darklady.com> wrote in message


Actually, polls continually show that while not all Americans
support abortion, particularly later in pregnancy, they do support
choice.


I certainly do. But I think it would be a lot better if all those horny
fukkers out there would exercise the slightest bit of adult intelligence
and
use birth control. Jesus, it is so readily available that it seems a
crime
to not use *something*. What is the big deal--why does everyone seem to
focus on pregnancy termination rather than prevention?


Availability of birth control in certain rural areas is limited by the
pharmacists "morals" in the same fashion that congress now holds up the
HPV
vaccine.

Jim, women's bodies and the issues surrounding them are the province of
women.
Men ought not arrogate to themselves the power to make our decisions.



That does not address the problem that *some* women create for themselves,
by failing to take more responsibility when they have sex. Even if we set
aside those women in areas where contraception may be difficult to obtain,
how do you explain why so many of them *allow* themselves to get pregnant in
urban areas? Jeez, here in Philly one can get all sorts of things,
virtually anywhere, over the counter, at places like 7-11. Pharmacies are
plentiful. Hospitals, clinics and private physicians are everywhere here.
So what is the reason for all these unplanned pregnancies?

If I were a woman, I'd just do what I had to do to get and use the
contraception I needed. End of story. No tears, no scenes.

Doesn't anybody believe in being the slightest bit responsible these days?
What is such a big deal about acting like an adult, rather than a silly
child? And why all this sympathy toward those morons that acted
irresponsibly?

Maybe the problem is that someone ought to tell them to grow the hell up,
because in those areas where contraceptives are readily available, there is
just no reason for large numbers of women to allow themselves to get
pregnant if they *really* don't want to.

It doesn't resolve the abortion debate, to be sure, but things would be
better is some people would just, plain, "grow-the-hell-up!"

There are several reasons. First, birth control is now 100% effective.
It does fail, even when being taken properly. There are a number of
things that can affect the effectiveness of birth control on the short
term, including even mild colds and flus. And certain medicines can
also affect the effectiveness of birth control.
Second, birth control is often NOT covered by insurance. This means
that the woman must pay the full cost of it each month. This can
create hardship for the woman if she is in a financial hardship
situation. In a choice between birth control and eating, most women
will choose eating. And in poverty stricken areas, there may be a lot
of women that have to make this decision.
Third, look at the number of times that people have sex every year,
cumulative across the country. We are talking about billions of times,
easily. (over 100 million women that are old enough to have sex, with
an average of 2-3 episodes of sex per WEEK. You do the math.) The
fact that there are only a couple million unplanned pregnancies, and
half of them from the small percentage of women that are not using
birth control for some reason, speaks well of the effectiveness of it.
Fourth, in many concervative parts of the country, it is getting harder
for women to find a pharmacy to get their birth control from. And that
means travelling greater distances and taking more time that they may
not have available to them. Require pharmacists to do their job, and
not force their personal views on their customers would help that
situation.
Perhaps you are the one that needs to grow up. In the real world,
things are not perfect, and things often go wrong. Abortion exists to
help women when things go wrong. It is that simple.
Acting like an adult means having to make the tough decisions that life
hands you. Do you get birth control, or do you eat? Can I properly
care for the embryo/fetus after it is born, and if not, what are my
options now and later? Given the facts of my life, is there a good
chance that it will be born healthy, and if not, do I want it to suffer
through its entire life?
Getting an abortion is not an easy decision for most women, and I do
not envy them for having to make that choice. However, the choice
needs to be there for the women that wish to use it. Having abortion
legal means that it can be regulated and the conditions under which it
is done can be kept clean, with requirements that the personnel
performing the abortions be properly trained doctors and nurses. As
history has shown us, making abortion illegal just creates a black
market for abortion clinics, with the abortions being unregulated, and
performed by people that have not been trained in medicine and under
unclean conditions. The women will still get abortions done, they will
just be more likely to suffer grievous harm, and even death, from the
procedure.
If you want to know what I am pro-choice, I can given you two very good
reasons. First, it is not my place to make that decision for any
women. And second, I know my history, and I know that making abortion
illegal will not stop the abortions and it will just harm more women
unnecessarily.
Mark Sebree
.

User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 02:27:07 PM
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:59:22 GMT, "JimR" <nobody@nowhere.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <e0vGe.876$Tk6.607@trnddc02> wrote:


"Natalie Clifford Barney" <SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote in message
news:42EA4C32.7B2F4CB5@20RueJacob.fr...



JimR wrote:

"Darklady" <darklady@darklady.com> wrote in message


Actually, polls continually show that while not all Americans
support abortion, particularly later in pregnancy, they do support
choice.


I certainly do. But I think it would be a lot better if all those horny
fukkers out there would exercise the slightest bit of adult intelligence
and
use birth control. Jesus, it is so readily available that it seems a
crime
to not use *something*. What is the big deal--why does everyone seem to
focus on pregnancy termination rather than prevention?


Availability of birth control in certain rural areas is limited by the
pharmacists "morals" in the same fashion that congress now holds up the
HPV
vaccine.

Jim, women's bodies and the issues surrounding them are the province of
women.
Men ought not arrogate to themselves the power to make our decisions.



That does not address the problem that *some* women create for themselves,
by failing to take more responsibility when they have sex. Even if we set
aside those women in areas where contraception may be difficult to obtain,
how do you explain why so many of them *allow* themselves to get pregnant in
urban areas? Jeez, here in Philly one can get all sorts of things,
virtually anywhere, over the counter, at places like 7-11. Pharmacies are
plentiful. Hospitals, clinics and private physicians are everywhere here.
So what is the reason for all these unplanned pregnancies?

Who cares? Sex is a legal activity for adults, and if a woman becomes
pregnant there is a safe and simple medical remedy available if she
wants it, just as there is a safe and simple medical remedy available
for food poisoning.


If I were a woman, I'd just do what I had to do to get and use the
contraception I needed. End of story. No tears, no scenes.

And contraception sometimes fails.


Doesn't anybody believe in being the slightest bit responsible these days?

Making a decision (either way) under the freedom of choice is taking
responsibility.

What is such a big deal about acting like an adult, rather than a silly
child? And why all this sympathy toward those morons that acted
irresponsibly?

Who are you to decide who acts irresponsibly?


Maybe the problem is that someone ought to tell them to grow the hell up,
because in those areas where contraceptives are readily available, there is
just no reason for large numbers of women to allow themselves to get
pregnant if they *really* don't want to.

I am amused by your constant comments on how women allow themselves to
get pregnant. Pregnancy is not a conscious decision, or a deliberate
act. Ask any woman who has tried unsuccessfully for years.


It doesn't resolve the abortion debate, to be sure, but things would be
better is some people would just, plain, "grow-the-hell-up!"

Who are you to say they have not?
.



User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 08:39:22 AM
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:47:12 GMT, "JimR" <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:


"Darklady" <darklady@darklady.com> wrote in message


Actually, polls continually show that while not all Americans
support abortion, particularly later in pregnancy, they do support
choice.


I certainly do. But I think it would be a lot better if all those horny
fukkers out there would exercise the slightest bit of adult intelligence and
use birth control. Jesus, it is so readily available that it seems a crime
to not use *something*. What is the big deal--why does everyone seem to
focus on pregnancy termination rather than prevention?

Because that's all that is availble when teaching abstinence doesn't
work.
I once heard Ralph Reed (Operation Rescue) being interviewed. He was
smooth-talking and convincing - if you already granted his contentious
premises and didn't bother to think about what he said.
Until the interviewer suggested that contraception education would
reduce the need for abortion.
He went ape-***** about procreation being a gift from God, sex intended
to produce children and if you didn't want children don't have sex,
etc. Made a complete idiot of himself.
.



User: "Sneekers"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 29 Jul 2005 06:15:57 AM
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:


"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:363ie1t12f6je50h6h0toik19q02mmh7nb@4ax.com...

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:32:43 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<8%5Ge.7936$8g5.3814@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:


"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e820d5$0$16587$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:pLxFe.4202$Ie1.259@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.

==================
It does. It gives woman the CHOICE... that's the law. :-)


It does not dictate an abortion in any pregnancy.
Choice is not sufficient for all the people of this society.


Why?


If you do not understand, why ask?
One reason is because Choice does not represent the will of the people
adequately.

It is meant to represent women--the only people whom are directly and
physically affecte dby pregnancy.
.

User: "Mark Sebree"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 06:02:08 PM
Johnny wrote:

"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e6888c$0$16560$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rivFe.3071$Ie1.2664@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:AdvFe.1686$G71.362@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like to
change the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?


$$ How is it forced on anyone?


Roe V Wade, 1973.

Sorry, but wrong, as usual. Roe v. Wade does not force anyone to get
an abortion. It only confirms the fact that abortion is legal and
available to any woman that wants it.

If a woman doesn't want to have an abortion who is FORCING her?


No telling since abortion in any pregnancy is legal.

However, forcing her to get an abortion is not legal. It is a form of
assault.


All decisions on abortion belong to the women
not some religious bigot or legislature.


*****!


$$ Whose decision SHOULD it be? Her mother's? Her neighbors? Children
she already has?


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.

It already does. If the woman wants an abortion, she can get one any
time prior to 12 weeks gestation all over the country, as much as 20
weeks in some states, and any time if the fetus is severely deformed to
the point where it could not survive childbirth or where continuing the
pregnancy endangers the woman.
Even in life threatening situations, the woman can always refuse an
abortion as well.
Very simply, her life, her body, her choice.
Mark Sebree
.
User: "Johnny"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 06:53:41 PM
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1122418928.733531.68560@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Johnny wrote:

"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e6888c$0$16560$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rivFe.3071$Ie1.2664@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:AdvFe.1686$G71.362@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like to
change the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?


$$ How is it forced on anyone?


Roe V Wade, 1973.


Sorry, but wrong, as usual. Roe v. Wade does not force anyone to get
an abortion. It only confirms the fact that abortion is legal and
available to any woman that wants it.

If a woman doesn't want to have an abortion who is FORCING her?


No telling since abortion in any pregnancy is legal.


However, forcing her to get an abortion is not legal. It is a form of
assault.


All decisions on abortion belong to the women
not some religious bigot or legislature.


*****!


$$ Whose decision SHOULD it be? Her mother's? Her neighbors?
Children
she already has?


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.


It already does. If the woman wants an abortion, she can get one any
time prior to 12 weeks gestation all over the country, as much as 20
weeks in some states, and any time if the fetus is severely deformed to
the point where it could not survive childbirth or where continuing the
pregnancy endangers the woman.

Even in life threatening situations, the woman can always refuse an
abortion as well.

Very simply, her life, her body, her choice.

Sexism.
.
User: "Mark Sebree"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 08:14:03 PM
Johnny wrote:

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1122418928.733531.68560@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Johnny wrote:

"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e6888c$0$16560$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rivFe.3071$Ie1.2664@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:AdvFe.1686$G71.362@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like to
change the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?


$$ How is it forced on anyone?


Roe V Wade, 1973.


Sorry, but wrong, as usual. Roe v. Wade does not force anyone to get
an abortion. It only confirms the fact that abortion is legal and
available to any woman that wants it.

If a woman doesn't want to have an abortion who is FORCING her?


No telling since abortion in any pregnancy is legal.


However, forcing her to get an abortion is not legal. It is a form of
assault.


All decisions on abortion belong to the women
not some religious bigot or legislature.


*****!


$$ Whose decision SHOULD it be? Her mother's? Her neighbors?
Children
she already has?


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.


It already does. If the woman wants an abortion, she can get one any
time prior to 12 weeks gestation all over the country, as much as 20
weeks in some states, and any time if the fetus is severely deformed to
the point where it could not survive childbirth or where continuing the
pregnancy endangers the woman.

Even in life threatening situations, the woman can always refuse an
abortion as well.

Very simply, her life, her body, her choice.


Sexism.

Not at all. With our current technology, men cannot get pregnant.
When you get pregnant, you can get an abortion as well if you wish.
Besides, what right do you have to demand her servitude, and demand
that she continue an unwanted pregnancy? Your rights stop at her nose,
just as her rights stop at your nose.
Mark Sebree
.
User: "Johnny"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 08:20:21 PM
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1122426842.953641.48770@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Johnny wrote:

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1122418928.733531.68560@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Johnny wrote:

"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e6888c$0$16560$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rivFe.3071$Ie1.2664@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:AdvFe.1686$G71.362@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like
to
change the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?


$$ How is it forced on anyone?


Roe V Wade, 1973.


Sorry, but wrong, as usual. Roe v. Wade does not force anyone to get
an abortion. It only confirms the fact that abortion is legal and
available to any woman that wants it.

If a woman doesn't want to have an abortion who is FORCING her?


No telling since abortion in any pregnancy is legal.


However, forcing her to get an abortion is not legal. It is a form of
assault.


All decisions on abortion belong to the women
not some religious bigot or legislature.


*****!


$$ Whose decision SHOULD it be? Her mother's? Her neighbors?
Children
she already has?


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.


It already does. If the woman wants an abortion, she can get one any
time prior to 12 weeks gestation all over the country, as much as 20
weeks in some states, and any time if the fetus is severely deformed to
the point where it could not survive childbirth or where continuing the
pregnancy endangers the woman.

Even in life threatening situations, the woman can always refuse an
abortion as well.

Very simply, her life, her body, her choice.


Sexism.


Not at all. With our current technology, men cannot get pregnant.

Another statement which relies on sexism.

When you get pregnant, you can get an abortion as well if you wish.

Why should I worry?
I am not stuck on sexist issues.

Besides, what right do you have to demand her servitude, and demand
that she continue an unwanted pregnancy?

I, the non-sexist, am not demanding that she do anything.

Your rights stop at her nose,
just as her rights stop at your nose.

I, a non-sexist, am not demanding that she do anything.
.
User: "Cracklin"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 27 Jul 2005 02:15:11 AM
"Cracklin' Rozie" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:42e7126b@sl-news....


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:jiBFe.5928$h.2825@bignews6.bellsouth.net...

I, a non-sexist, am not demanding that she do anything.

===================
Exactly! You want to LAW to force *your will* upon her and her choice!
--
CR....
"We look at the ancient Greeks with their gods on a mountain top throwing
lightning bolts and say, 'Those ancient Greeks. They were so silly. So
primitive
and naive. Not like our religions. We have burning bushes talking to
people and
guys walking on water. We're ...sophisticated.'"
-= Paul Provenza =-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


.

User: "Mark Sebree"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 10:00:27 PM
Johnny wrote:

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1122426842.953641.48770@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Johnny wrote:

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1122418928.733531.68560@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Johnny wrote:

"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e6888c$0$16560$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rivFe.3071$Ie1.2664@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:AdvFe.1686$G71.362@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like
to
change the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?


$$ How is it forced on anyone?


Roe V Wade, 1973.


Sorry, but wrong, as usual. Roe v. Wade does not force anyone to get
an abortion. It only confirms the fact that abortion is legal and
available to any woman that wants it.

If a woman doesn't want to have an abortion who is FORCING her?


No telling since abortion in any pregnancy is legal.


However, forcing her to get an abortion is not legal. It is a form of
assault.


All decisions on abortion belong to the women
not some religious bigot or legislature.


*****!


$$ Whose decision SHOULD it be? Her mother's? Her neighbors?
Children
she already has?


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.


It already does. If the woman wants an abortion, she can get one any
time prior to 12 weeks gestation all over the country, as much as 20
weeks in some states, and any time if the fetus is severely deformed to
the point where it could not survive childbirth or where continuing the
pregnancy endangers the woman.

Even in life threatening situations, the woman can always refuse an
abortion as well.

Very simply, her life, her body, her choice.


Sexism.


Not at all. With our current technology, men cannot get pregnant.


Another statement which relies on sexism.

No, a statement of fact.


When you get pregnant, you can get an abortion as well if you wish.


Why should I worry?

You shouldn't. Nobody cares about your tyranny.

I am not stuck on sexist issues.

Yes, you are. You are promoting sexism.


Besides, what right do you have to demand her servitude, and demand
that she continue an unwanted pregnancy?


I, the non-sexist, am not demanding that she do anything.

You, the sexist, are demanding that she continue an unwanted pregnancy.
You do not think that she should have control of her own body, and
that she should do as you command. And by removing the option of
getting an abortion, you are demanding that she continue her unwanted
pregnancy because you have removed every legal option that she has.


Your rights stop at her nose,
just as her rights stop at your nose.


I, a non-sexist, am not demanding that she do anything.

You, the sexist, are demanding that she continue her unwanted pregnancy
and you are demanding that she suffer because you say so. You are
demanding that she listen to you who knows nothing about her and does
not care about her in any way, rather than think for herself and do
what is right and best for herself. And you have never adequately
explained why you think that you have this right.
Mark Sebree
.



User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 11:34:43 PM
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:53:41 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<11AFe.2280$G71.1425@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:


"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1122418928.733531.68560@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Johnny wrote:

"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e6888c$0$16560$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rivFe.3071$Ie1.2664@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:AdvFe.1686$G71.362@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like to
change the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?


$$ How is it forced on anyone?


Roe V Wade, 1973.


Sorry, but wrong, as usual. Roe v. Wade does not force anyone to get
an abortion. It only confirms the fact that abortion is legal and
available to any woman that wants it.

If a woman doesn't want to have an abortion who is FORCING her?


No telling since abortion in any pregnancy is legal.


However, forcing her to get an abortion is not legal. It is a form of
assault.


All decisions on abortion belong to the women
not some religious bigot or legislature.


*****!


$$ Whose decision SHOULD it be? Her mother's? Her neighbors?
Children
she already has?


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.


It already does. If the woman wants an abortion, she can get one any
time prior to 12 weeks gestation all over the country, as much as 20
weeks in some states, and any time if the fetus is severely deformed to
the point where it could not survive childbirth or where continuing the
pregnancy endangers the woman.

Even in life threatening situations, the woman can always refuse an
abortion as well.

Very simply, her life, her body, her choice.


Sexism.

Nonsense.
.



User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 05:53:00 PM
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:18:24 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<pLxFe.4202$Ie1.259@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:


"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e6888c$0$16560$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...


"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rivFe.3071$Ie1.2664@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:AdvFe.1686$G71.362@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like to
change the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?


$$ How is it forced on anyone?


Roe V Wade, 1973.

That forces nothing on anyone. It simply allows a decision to be
made. Why are you so opposed to people having the right to make their
own decisions?


If a woman doesn't want to have an abortion who is FORCING her?


No telling since abortion in any pregnancy is legal.

Forcing a woman to have an abortion is not legal.


All decisions on abortion belong to the women
not some religious bigot or legislature.


*****!


$$ Whose decision SHOULD it be? Her mother's? Her neighbors? Children
she already has?


The law should dictate when abortion is allowed.

Why?
.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 11:08:43 PM
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:

"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like to change
the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?

All of it.

Before birth, and certainly before the third trimester, the fetus is not
yet a functioning human.


A total lie.

Lunatic.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "Mark Sebree"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 05:46:48 PM
Johnny wrote:

"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:AdvFe.1686$G71.362@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like to change
the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?

All of it. With pro-choice, nobody is forced to remain pregnant.
Religious fanatics want to force their beliefs on everyone, especially
those that do not believe as they do.


Before birth, and certainly before the third trimester, the fetus is not
yet a functioning human.


A total lie.

Bill's statement was a total truth. A functioning human being does not
reside within the body of another human being.


It is a part of,


Sure doesn't seem that way.

And yet, it is. What thing seem to you is usually inaccurate.


and totally dependent on, the women's body.


It has no body of its own?

Yes, it does. And it is totally dependent on the woman's body. And
the woman has the right to refuse the use of her body to anyone and
anything, and can issue that refusal at any time.


All decisions on abortion belong to the women
not some religious bigot or legislature.


*****!

His statement is a statement of fact.

WIthout representative government there is no democracy.

However, that does not mean that the legislature has the right to force
women to continue unwanted pregnancies against their wills. That is
slavery to the government, which is unconstitutional, and punishment
for something that is not a crime, which is also unconstitutional.
But then, you do not want democracy, you want a totalitarian theocracy
with your belief system in control.
Why should religious bigots or the legislature have the right to demand
that women continue unwanted pregnancies against their wills and to
their detriments?
Mark Sebree
.
User: "Johnny"

Title: Re: Pope and abortion 26 Jul 2005 07:02:03 PM
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1122418008.228886.239380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Johnny wrote:

"Bill" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:AdvFe.1686$G71.362@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

The serious problems is that these religious fanatics would like to
change
the law and
FORCE this on everyone else.


What part of Pro-Choice is NOT forced on the nation?


All of it. With pro-choice, nobody is forced to remain pregnant.
Religious fanatics want to force their beliefs on everyone, especially
those that do not believe as they do.


Before birth, and certainly before the third trimester, the fetus is
not
yet a functioning human.


A total lie.


Bill's statement was a total truth. A functioning human being does not
reside within the body of another human being.


It is a part of,


Sure doesn't seem that way.


And yet, it is. What thing seem to you is usually inaccurate.


and totally dependent on, the women's body.


It has no body of its own?


Yes, it does. And it is totally dependent on the woman's body. And
the woman has the right to refuse the use of her body to anyone and
anything, and can issue that refusal at any time.

Why don't you tell that to the pimps who overlord it over them to turn
tricks?
Why don't you tell that to all the employers who emlpoy women?


All decisions on abortion belong to the women
not some religious bigot or legislature.


*****!


His statement is a statement of fact.

You are defending a lie.

WIthout representative government there is no democracy.


However, that does not mean that the legislature has the right to force
women to continue unwanted pregnancies against their wills.

It does.

That is
slavery to the government,

Not in fact. The government has a duty to represent its people, and it also
has a right to dictate what people can do with their bodies in the interest
of serving the people.
And, the government can require performance by persons who commit various
acts in society.

which is unconstitutional, and punishment
for something that is not a crime, which is also unconstitutional.

*****.

But then, you do not want democracy, you want a totalitarian theocracy
with your belief system in control.

*****.
You are resisting democratic rule.

Why should religious bigots or the legislature have the right to demand
that women continue unwanted pregnancies against their wills and to
their detriments?

The Constitution dictates that this nation be operated for the people, for
freedom.
.



  Page 42 of 46

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16