| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Sam" |
| Date: |
06 Jan 2004 12:36:07 PM |
| Object: |
Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned Parenthood.
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30673
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27687
-Sam
http://www.ppl.org/pregnant.html
http://www.gemedicalsystems.com/rad/us/4d/thennow.html
.
|
|
| User: "Dingleberry" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
15 Jan 2004 12:23:39 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns946C59ABEC452keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in news:3732a3401e827a2014644173c0b35719
@news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 09:30:47p, Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???>
wrote in news:3fff63d6$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Godwin's Law is another way for you to cry to momma.
i see you wet your pants again
Only those who can't defend their position resort to Godwin's Law.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
15 Jan 2004 04:03:34 PM |
|
|
(Dingleberry) wrote in
news:377dfa5a.0401151023.5b8be9c9@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C59ABEC452keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in news:3732a3401e827a2014644173c0b35719
@news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 09:30:47p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff63d6$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Godwin's Law is another way for you to cry to momma.
i see you wet your pants again
Only those who can't defend their position resort to Godwin's Law.
is that why he did it?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "webgiant" |
|
| Title: People Misrepresent Godwin's Law! |
20 Jan 2004 01:55:42 PM |
|
|
On 15 Jan 2004 10:23:39 -0800,
Dingleberry
<dingleberry@subdimension.com>
wrote:
"james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
Robert Buchanan wrote:
Godwin's Law is another way
for you to cry to momma.
i see you wet your pants again
Only those who can't defend their
position resort to Godwin's Law.
Only those who DON'T KNOW WHAT
GODWIN'S LAW IS resort to using
it like an "argument".
Godwin's Law: The chance of someone
mentioning Hitler or Nazis during
a Usenet Discussion is directly
proportional to the length of the
discussion.
THAT'S IT. No "if someone mentions
Hitler the discussion is over and
the person mentioning Hitler/Nazis
loses" *crap*. Godwin's Law is
nothing more and nothing less than
*a statement of probability* of a
particular event occurring.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
09 Jan 2004 09:54:29 PM |
|
|
Snubis, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you flung
yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sat, 10 Jan 2004
03:22:47 GMT and groaned:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 09:30:47p, Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???>
wrote in news:3fff63d6$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Snubis, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you flung
yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Fri, 09 Jan
2004 21:32:28 GMT and groaned:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 02:54:13p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff06e4$0$11452$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Snubis, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you
flung yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Fri,
09 Jan 2004 19:21:51 GMT and groaned:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 01:22:33p, Me <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in
news:srhi-88DC4B.13223309012004@comcast.ash.giganews.com:
In article <%dWKb.14275$6B.5837@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"John Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Krisblake" <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in message
news:kbaovv826rh9lqf1125gh0o6p3d2s22ds1@4ax.com...
On 7 Jan 2004 07:06:32 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Tue 06 Jan 2004 01:36:07p, (Sam)
wrote in news:5b6a2e7d.0401061036.5235c7e3@posting.google.com:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at
Planned Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my
opinion, the equivalent of rape.
So, you are ignorant of the law in this area.
Hah! You're one to talk about knowledge of the law. You're the
same person who says abortion is the same as murder. Right?
I guess the extermination of the Jews in Nazi Germany wasn't murder
because it was legal, right?
Godwin invoked and groups restored, coward.
Godwin's Law is only for losers who can't answer a direct question or
can't handle themselves on usenet.
True, and it applies to you quite well.
I wouldn't be surprised if the
whole Godwin's law thing started out as a joke and a bunch of
self-appointed losernet nazi netKKKops took it *seriously*.
Or you could actually *know*, you ignorant buffoon:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/
Just look at the rationale - that in any usenet discussion that goes
on long enough, someone will *eventually* mention Hitler. DUH!
You're living proof, noob.
If ANY usenet discussion goes on long enough, someone will eventually
bring up ANYTHING that one can bring up on usenet, including Hitler,
washing machines, etc. That being the nature of infinite threads and
all.
Wrapping that skull of yours around the Godwin concept is quite a
challenge for you, eh?
Godwin's Law is another way for you to cry to momma.
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their *****.
--
-Robert
http://www.members.mher.org/rbuchanan/
"That which is new can only be effective in the context of what is old and
familiar."
-Krzysztof Penderecki
Uberkook Ying states the obvious:
"i am a super thinker. can't you tell?"
<670584bc.0401071149.6b5fad73@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Starshine Moonbeam" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
09 Jan 2004 10:05:41 PM |
|
|
In article <3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>, "Robert
Buchanan"(?????????@?????????.???) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
http://www.members.mher.org/rbuchanan/
Comes up suspended.
--
mhm 31x9
Smeeter #28, 29, or 30
WSD #30
Skep-ti-cult ID# 365-12149-907
Alcatroll Labs Inc. (Division of Incendiary Devices)
StArSHiNe_MoOnbEAm aT HoTMaIL DoT cOM
http://www.geocities.com/tobydog9
"My candle burns at both ends. It will not last the night;
but ah, my foes, and oh, my friends, it gives a lovely light."
-- Edna St. Vincent Millay
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
10 Jan 2004 02:02:15 AM |
|
|
Starshine Moonbeam, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since
you flung yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sat, 10
Jan 2004 04:05:41 GMT and groaned:
In article <3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>, "Robert
Buchanan"(?????????@?????????.???) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
http://www.members.mher.org/rbuchanan/
Comes up suspended.
Thanks for letting me know, because it was up this morning. They just
yanked it and didn't even send me an email about it...
--
-Robert
"That which is new can only be effective in the context of what is old and
familiar."
-Krzysztof Penderecki
Uberkook Ying states the obvious:
"i am a super thinker. can't you tell?"
<670584bc.0401071149.6b5fad73@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter J Ross" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
11 Jan 2004 03:34:50 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 at 08:02 GMT, Robert Buchanan wrote in
alt.usenet.kooks:
Starshine Moonbeam, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since
you flung yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sat, 10
Jan 2004 04:05:41 GMT and groaned:
In article <3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>, "Robert
Buchanan"(?????????@?????????.???) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
http://www.members.mher.org/rbuchanan/
Comes up suspended.
Thanks for letting me know, because it was up this morning. They just
yanked it and didn't even send me an email about it...
Netkkkops or just incompetent sysadmins?
--
PJR :-)
mhm #34x8 Smeeter #30 WSD #42
Alcatroll Labs Inc. (Executive Vice-President)
news:alt.fan.pjr - now with 10% extra nuts!
(Remove NOSPAM to reply)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Snubis" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
09 Jan 2004 10:18:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???>
wrote in news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Snubis, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you flung
yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sat, 10 Jan
2004 03:22:47 GMT and groaned:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 09:30:47p, Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???>
wrote in news:3fff63d6$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Snubis, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you
flung yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Fri, 09
Jan 2004 21:32:28 GMT and groaned:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 02:54:13p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff06e4$0$11452$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Snubis, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you
flung yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Fri,
09 Jan 2004 19:21:51 GMT and groaned:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 01:22:33p, Me <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in
news:srhi-88DC4B.13223309012004@comcast.ash.giganews.com:
In article <%dWKb.14275$6B.5837@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"John Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Krisblake" <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in message
news:kbaovv826rh9lqf1125gh0o6p3d2s22ds1@4ax.com...
On 7 Jan 2004 07:06:32 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Tue 06 Jan 2004 01:36:07p, (Sam)
wrote in news:5b6a2e7d.0401061036.5235c7e3@posting.google.com:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at
Planned Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my
opinion, the equivalent of rape.
So, you are ignorant of the law in this area.
Hah! You're one to talk about knowledge of the law. You're the
same person who says abortion is the same as murder. Right?
I guess the extermination of the Jews in Nazi Germany wasn't murder
because it was legal, right?
Godwin invoked and groups restored, coward.
Godwin's Law is only for losers who can't answer a direct question or
can't handle themselves on usenet.
True, and it applies to you quite well.
I wouldn't be surprised if the
whole Godwin's law thing started out as a joke and a bunch of
self-appointed losernet nazi netKKKops took it *seriously*.
Or you could actually *know*, you ignorant buffoon:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/
Just look at the rationale - that in any usenet discussion that goes
on long enough, someone will *eventually* mention Hitler. DUH!
You're living proof, noob.
If ANY usenet discussion goes on long enough, someone will eventually
bring up ANYTHING that one can bring up on usenet, including Hitler,
washing machines, etc. That being the nature of infinite threads and
all.
Wrapping that skull of yours around the Godwin concept is quite a
challenge for you, eh?
Godwin's Law is another way for you to cry to momma.
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their *****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
10 Jan 2004 07:50:12 AM |
|
|
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in news:ef1e389257cb3c0b8d4e366901347ea0
@news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???>
wrote in news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their *****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
you're angry that he recognized you, newbie.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Snubis" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
10 Jan 2004 02:00:09 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns946C59E0A2793keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in news:ef1e389257cb3c0b8d4e366901347ea0
@news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???>
wrote in news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their *****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
you're angry that he recognized you, newbie.
I bet I've been using usenet longer than he has.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
10 Jan 2004 02:19:36 PM |
|
|
(Snubis) wrote in
news:c080b629.0401101200.22108ad0@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C59E0A2793keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in news:ef1e389257cb3c0b8d4e366901347ea0
@news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their *****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
you're angry that he recognized you, newbie.
I bet I've been using usenet longer than he has.
and thus you demonstrate that you don't even understand the meaning of the
term newbie," newbie.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dingleberry" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
11 Jan 2004 09:38:41 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns946C9BE59A8DDkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
snubis@hotmail.com (Snubis) wrote in
news:c080b629.0401101200.22108ad0@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C59E0A2793keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in news:ef1e389257cb3c0b8d4e366901347ea0
@news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their *****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
you're angry that he recognized you, newbie.
I bet I've been using usenet longer than he has.
and thus you demonstrate that you don't even understand the meaning of the
term newbie," newbie.
And just how has he done that? You're a fucking idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
11 Jan 2004 10:08:13 AM |
|
|
(Dingleberry) wrote in
news:377dfa5a.0401110738.6e1dba03@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C9BE59A8DDkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
snubis@hotmail.com (Snubis) wrote in
news:c080b629.0401101200.22108ad0@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C59E0A2793keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in news:ef1e389257cb3c0b8d4e366901347ea0
@news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their
*****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
you're angry that he recognized you, newbie.
I bet I've been using usenet longer than he has.
and thus you demonstrate that you don't even understand the meaning of
the term newbie," newbie.
And just how has he done that?
if you don't know, since it is an inch or two above, then you have
demonstrated that you're not qualified to know.
You're a fucking idiot.
now you proved you're not qualified to know.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
11 Jan 2004 11:07:23 AM |
|
|
Dingleberry, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you
flung yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sun, 11
Jan 2004 15:38:41 GMT and groaned:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C9BE59A8DDkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
snubis@hotmail.com (Snubis) wrote in
news:c080b629.0401101200.22108ad0@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C59E0A2793keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in
news:ef1e389257cb3c0b8d4e366901347ea0 @news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their
*****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
you're angry that he recognized you, newbie.
I bet I've been using usenet longer than he has.
and thus you demonstrate that you don't even understand the meaning
of the term newbie," newbie.
And just how has he done that?
By proving himself inept at socking up, jackass.
You're a fucking idiot.
Is the noob upset?
--
-Robert
http://www.yepa.net/rbuchanan/
"That which is new can only be effective in the context of what is old and
familiar."
-Krzysztof Penderecki
Uberkook Ying states the obvious:
"i am a super thinker. can't you tell?"
<670584bc.0401071149.6b5fad73@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
11 Jan 2004 01:39:14 PM |
|
|
"Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message
news:400182ca$0$22845$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net...
Dingleberry, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you
flung yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sun, 11
Jan 2004 15:38:41 GMT and groaned:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C9BE59A8DDkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
snubis@hotmail.com (Snubis) wrote in
news:c080b629.0401101200.22108ad0@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C59E0A2793keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in
news:ef1e389257cb3c0b8d4e366901347ea0 @news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their
*****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
you're angry that he recognized you, newbie.
I bet I've been using usenet longer than he has.
and thus you demonstrate that you don't even understand the meaning
of the term newbie," newbie.
And just how has he done that?
By proving himself inept at socking up, jackass.
You're a fucking idiot.
Is the noob upset?
hey rubbert, can i ask you a question: how long have you been hanging from
usenet?
--
-Robert
http://www.yoda.net/biatchcannon/
"That which is new can only be effective in the context of what is old and
familiar."
-Krzysztof Penderecki
Uberkook Ying states the obvious:
"i am a super tanker. can't you tell?"
<670584bc.0401071149.6b5fad73@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
11 Jan 2004 05:59:12 PM |
|
|
, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you flung
yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sun, 11 Jan
2004 19:39:14 GMT and groaned:
"Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message
news:400182ca$0$22845$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net...
Dingleberry, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since
you flung yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:38:41 GMT and groaned:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C9BE59A8DDkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
snubis@hotmail.com (Snubis) wrote in
news:c080b629.0401101200.22108ad0@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C59E0A2793keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in
news:ef1e389257cb3c0b8d4e366901347ea0 @news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their
*****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
you're angry that he recognized you, newbie.
I bet I've been using usenet longer than he has.
and thus you demonstrate that you don't even understand the
meaning of the term newbie," newbie.
And just how has he done that?
By proving himself inept at socking up, jackass.
You're a fucking idiot.
Is the noob upset?
hey rubbert, can i ask you a question: how long have you been hanging
from usenet?
Why do you ask, Ying?
--
-Robert
http://www.yepa.net/rbuchanan/
"That which is new can only be effective in the context of what is old and
familiar."
-Krzysztof Penderecki
Uberkook Ying states the obvious:
"i am a super thinker. can't you tell?"
<670584bc.0401071149.6b5fad73@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
11 Jan 2004 09:54:50 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:59:12 +0000, Robert
Buchanan posted:
, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you flung yourself
headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:39:14
GMT and groaned:
"Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message
news:400182ca$0$22845$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net...
Dingleberry, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you
flung yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sun, 11
Jan 2004 15:38:41 GMT and groaned:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C9BE59A8DDkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
snubis@hotmail.com (Snubis) wrote in
news:c080b629.0401101200.22108ad0@posting.google.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns946C59E0A2793keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>...
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in
news:ef1e389257cb3c0b8d4e366901347ea0 @news.teranews.com:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 10:54:29p, Robert Buchanan
<?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:3fff7774$0$22842$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their
*****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
you're angry that he recognized you, newbie.
I bet I've been using usenet longer than he has.
and thus you demonstrate that you don't even understand the meaning
of the term newbie," newbie.
And just how has he done that?
By proving himself inept at socking up, jackass.
You're a fucking idiot.
Is the noob upset?
hey rubbert, can i ask you a question: how long have you been hanging
from usenet?
Why do you ask, Ying?
Not ashtonishing since he has been spanked in rec.alt.poetry for years!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Godwin's law is for luzers |
10 Jan 2004 01:59:12 AM |
|
|
Snubis, let's talk. I've been concerned about you ever since you flung
yourself headfirst into alt.usenet.kooks sometime around Sat, 10 Jan 2004
04:18:10 GMT and groaned:
Wrapping that skull of yours around the Godwin concept is quite a
challenge for you, eh?
Godwin's Law is another way for you to cry to momma.
Some newbies are such ingrates when we try to curb their *****.
You wouldn't know a newbie if one raped your *****, noob.
May I ask you a question?
--
-Robert
http://www.members.mher.org/rbuchanan/
"That which is new can only be effective in the context of what is old and
familiar."
-Krzysztof Penderecki
Uberkook Ying states the obvious:
"i am a super thinker. can't you tell?"
<670584bc.0401071149.6b5fad73@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 11:22:10 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:12:43 GMT, "John Wentzky"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Krisblake" <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in message
news:kbaovv826rh9lqf1125gh0o6p3d2s22ds1@4ax.com...
On 7 Jan 2004 07:06:32 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Tue 06 Jan 2004 01:36:07p, (Sam) wrote in
news:5b6a2e7d.0401061036.5235c7e3@posting.google.com:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned
Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my opinion,
the equivalent of rape.
So, you are ignorant of the law in this area.
I said IN MY OPION, you fuckless retard.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 11:39:32 AM |
|
|
"Krisblake" <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in message
news:d1govvgis3ehn95sg18932kek7afml9use@4ax.com...
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:12:43 GMT, "John Wentzky"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Krisblake" <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in message
news:kbaovv826rh9lqf1125gh0o6p3d2s22ds1@4ax.com...
On 7 Jan 2004 07:06:32 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Tue 06 Jan 2004 01:36:07p, (Sam) wrote
in
news:5b6a2e7d.0401061036.5235c7e3@posting.google.com:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned
Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my opinion,
the equivalent of rape.
So, you are ignorant of the law in this area.
I said IN MY OPION, you fuckless retard.
I get the impression that you really like me somehow.
I like you and your children.
Just trying to be of help here.
Not only for one sect either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 11:58:55 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:39:32 GMT, "John Wentzky"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Krisblake" <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in message
news:d1govvgis3ehn95sg18932kek7afml9use@4ax.com...
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:12:43 GMT, "John Wentzky"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Krisblake" <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in message
news:kbaovv826rh9lqf1125gh0o6p3d2s22ds1@4ax.com...
On 7 Jan 2004 07:06:32 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Tue 06 Jan 2004 01:36:07p, (Sam) wrote
in
news:5b6a2e7d.0401061036.5235c7e3@posting.google.com:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned
Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my opinion,
the equivalent of rape.
So, you are ignorant of the law in this area.
I said IN MY OPION, you fuckless retard.
I get the impression that you really like me somehow.
I think somewhere in that clouded brain of yours rests an individual
with marginal potential, but potential nevertheless.
I like you and your children.
Just trying to be of help here.
You're not helping people by being an intrusive haemorrhoidal
*****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Snubis" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 10:32:36 AM |
|
|
On Wed 07 Jan 2004 10:45:28a, Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in
news:kbaovv826rh9lqf1125gh0o6p3d2s22ds1@4ax.com:
On 7 Jan 2004 07:06:32 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Tue 06 Jan 2004 01:36:07p, (Sam) wrote in
news:5b6a2e7d.0401061036.5235c7e3@posting.google.com:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned
Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my opinion,
the equivalent of rape.
Why do you hate human life so much?
.
|
|
|
| User: "rewind" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 12:16:12 PM |
|
|
In article <d6474b6bc415ed3987d53893926513fc@news.teranews.com>,
snubis@wp.pl says...
On Wed 07 Jan 2004 10:45:28a, Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in
news:kbaovv826rh9lqf1125gh0o6p3d2s22ds1@4ax.com:
On 7 Jan 2004 07:06:32 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Tue 06 Jan 2004 01:36:07p, (Sam) wrote in
news:5b6a2e7d.0401061036.5235c7e3@posting.google.com:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned
Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my opinion,
the equivalent of rape.
Why do you hate human life so much?
What's to like about it?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 11:24:33 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:32:36 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Wed 07 Jan 2004 10:45:28a, Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in
news:kbaovv826rh9lqf1125gh0o6p3d2s22ds1@4ax.com:
On 7 Jan 2004 07:06:32 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Tue 06 Jan 2004 01:36:07p, (Sam) wrote in
news:5b6a2e7d.0401061036.5235c7e3@posting.google.com:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned
Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my opinion,
the equivalent of rape.
Why do you hate human life so much?
I endured two full term pregnancies, and am lovingly raising the
results of those pregnancies; my two, amazingly beautiful children.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enigma" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 05:13:59 PM |
|
|
sdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvk
jdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdf
gskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfb
vksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbv
kjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvb
dsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsd
fvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsd
fgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkj
sgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbv
kjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdv
kjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdf
vbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbd
fvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsg
bvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjd
fbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkj
sdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjs
dfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfv
ksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbk
vbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdf
bvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsd
fgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdf
bvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjs
bdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsd
likhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkj
sgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskd
bdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjks
bfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvk
jsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkj
vbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvk
jsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkv
jdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdv
kjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkj
sdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdf
vksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkv
bdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfb
vkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfg
skdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbv
ksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsb
dvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdl
ikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsg
vkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbd
fbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfd
vkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsd
fvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdf
vksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgb
vjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbv
kjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdb
fkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvk
sdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbd
kvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikh
gsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkj
sdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbv
kjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvb
dsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvb
kjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgs
kdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjks
bfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvk
jsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjv
bdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkj
sgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjd
fbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkj
sdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdf
bvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvks
fbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbds
dlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkj
dvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdb
dfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdf
bkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjs
dfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgs
dfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsg
bvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkj
sbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsd
bfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkj
sgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfb
dkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksb
fdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvb
kjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvb
dfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbk
vbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdf
bvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfg
skdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbv
ksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbd
vkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdyysd
likhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsg
vkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbd
Why do you assholes post to alt.startrek.vs.starwars?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 07:28:51 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:13:59 GMT, "Enigma" <xtreme@qqqq.qqq> wrote:
sdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvk
jdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdf
gskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfb
vksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbv
kjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvb
dsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsd
fvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsd
fgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkj
sgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbv
kjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdv
kjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdf
vbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbd
fvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsg
bvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjd
fbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkj
sdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjs
dfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfv
ksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbk
vbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdf
bvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsd
fgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdf
bvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjs
bdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsd
likhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkj
sgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskd
bdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjks
bfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvk
jsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkj
vbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvk
jsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkv
jdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdv
kjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkj
sdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdf
vksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkv
bdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfb
vkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfg
skdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbv
ksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsb
dvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdl
ikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsg
vkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbd
fbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfd
vkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsd
fvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdf
vksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgb
vjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbv
kjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdb
fkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvk
sdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbd
kvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikh
gsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkj
sdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbv
kjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvb
dsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvb
kjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgs
kdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjks
bfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvk
jsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjv
bdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkj
sgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjd
fbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkj
sdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdf
bvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvks
fbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbds
dlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkj
dvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdb
dfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdf
bkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjs
dfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgs
dfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsg
bvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkj
sbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsd
bfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkj
sgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfb
dkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksb
fdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvb
kjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvb
dfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbk
vbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdf
bvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfg
skdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbv
ksdfbkvbdsdlikhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbd
vkjsdfvbkjsgvkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbdyysd
likhgsdfgskdbdfbvkjsbdvkjsdfvbkjsg
vkjsgbvjksbfdvkjsdbfkjvbdfvksfbdkvjdfbvkjdvbkjsdfbvksdfbkvbd
Ditto.
[...]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 11:19:55 PM |
|
|
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my opinion,
the equivalent of rape.
Why do you hate human life so much?
Why do you hate people so much?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 05:50:59 PM |
|
|
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote in
news:d6474b6bc415ed3987d53893926513fc@news.teranews.com:
On Wed 07 Jan 2004 10:45:28a, Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote in
news:kbaovv826rh9lqf1125gh0o6p3d2s22ds1@4ax.com:
On 7 Jan 2004 07:06:32 GMT, Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
On Tue 06 Jan 2004 01:36:07p, (Sam) wrote in
news:5b6a2e7d.0401061036.5235c7e3@posting.google.com:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned
Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Forcing women to stay pregnant against their will is, in my opinion,
the equivalent of rape.
Why do you hate human life so much?
when you lie, does anyone believe you?
--
"James Keegan has shown he does not favor and/or support
legalized abortion."
-coward bobby heishman lying as "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
news:1eednfCfCfJV3nOiRVn-hg@comcast.com:
"I also have you on record for not supporting and/or favoring legalized
abortion as well."
-Robert Heishman lying as coward Osprey about Ray Fischer in
<ouednVs5R7Zs5m2iRVn-vA@comcast.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 11:59:07 AM |
|
|
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Sam) wrote:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned
Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Except there was no cover-up, and pro-liars like Mark Crutcher and Sam
are lying about it. No surprise there.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Possible Cover-up of Sex Crimes at Planned Parenthood |
07 Jan 2004 05:53:53 PM |
|
|
(Spartakus) wrote in news:6ed74dfa.0401070959.38198ee5
@posting.google.com:
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:
sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Sam) wrote:
Here are articles about possible cover-up of sex crimes at Planned
Parenthood.
No surprise there.
Except there was no cover-up, and pro-liars like Mark Crutcher and Sam
are lying about it. No surprise there.
snubis knew of the lies and, by inference, endorsed them.
--
"James Keegan has shown he does not favor and/or support
legalized abortion."
-coward bobby heishman lying as "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
news:1eednfCfCfJV3nOiRVn-hg@comcast.com:
"I also have you on record for not supporting and/or favoring legalized
abortion as well."
-Robert Heishman lying as coward Osprey about Ray Fischer in
<ouednVs5R7Zs5m2iRVn-vA@comcast.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
