|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: President's Radio Address |
13 Dec 2003 11:00:14 PM |
|
|
In talk.abortion, Craig Chilton
<xanadu222@mchsi.com>
wrote
on Sun, 14 Dec 2003 00:22:52 GMT
<4008abf3.36023917@netnews.mchsi.com>:
On 13 Dec 2003 08:43:40 -0800,
"Papa Jack"<papajack@stic.net> wrote:
[ ... ]
Our President shows...
**his** LACK of
...compassion by signing the [ID&E] Ban...
Thus PROVING that he dosn't give a rat's *****
for women.
You are, of course, assuming that it is in fact an
ID&E ban. AIUI, it's a Partial Birth Abortion ban --
and is so vaguely worded that it's far from clear to me
that they couldn't misuse the law later to ban various
other procedures.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: President's Radio Address |
14 Dec 2003 12:10:33 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 05:00:14 GMT,
"The Ghost In The Machine"
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Papa Jack"<papajack@stic.net> wrote:
[ ... ]
Our President shows...
**his** LACK of
...compassion by signing the [ID&E] Ban...
Thus PROVING that he dosn't give a rat's *****
for women.
You are, of course, assuming that it is in fact an
ID&E ban. AIUI, it's a Partial Birth Abortion ban --
and is so vaguely worded that it's far from clear to me
that they couldn't misuse the law later to ban various
other procedures.
Good point, Ghost! The purported intention is to ban ID&Es,
but you are right that in reality, it appears to be a case of the
Anti-Choice camel nosing under the tent of abortion rights.
Hopefully, that subterfuge will just make it easier for the
Supreme Court to SCRAP!
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Papa Jack" |
|
| Title: Re: President's Radio Address |
15 Dec 2003 11:46:15 AM |
|
|
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message
news:<401afd22.56809857@netnews.mchsi.com>...
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Papa Jack"<papajack@stic.net> wrote:
======================================================================
Papa Jack commented:
On December 13, 2003, the White House Press
Office released a transcript of the President's
radio address. Go to:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031213/dcsa001_1.html
_______________________________________________________________
Excerpt:
[...]
"Legislation passed this year also showed the
compassion and the good heart of America.
We created the American Dream Down Payment
Fund to help low- income citizens afford
the down payment on homes of their own. We
defended children from the violence of par-
tial birth abortion, and passed new incen-
tives to promote the adoption of children
in foster care...."
[...]
_______________________________________________________________
Papa Jack comments:
Our President shows...
Our President shows our nation's compassion by
signing the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban and pro-
moting the adoption of foster children.
======================================================================
Craig Chilton wrote:
**his** LACK of
======================================================================
Papa Jack comments:
...our nation's compassion by
signing the Partial-Birth
Abortion Ban...
======================================================================
Craig Chilton wrote:
Thus PROVING that he dosn't give a rat's *****
for women.
======================================================================
Ghost wrote:
You are, of course, assuming that it is in fact an
ID&E ban. AIUI, it's a Partial Birth Abortion ban --
and is so vaguely worded that it's far from clear to me
that they couldn't misuse the law later to ban various
other procedures.
======================================================================
Craig Chilton wrote:
Good point, Ghost! The purported intention is to ban ID&Es,
but you are right that in reality, it appears to be a case of the
Anti-Choice camel nosing under the tent of abortion rights.
Hopefully, that subterfuge will just make it easier for the
Supreme Court to SCRAP!
======================================================================
Papa Jack remarks:
You're exactly correct, Craig and Ghost. We will drag
this out -- and continue to find other ways to get the
horror that is abortion in front of the American public
in ways they simply can't ignore.
I do appreciate your cooperation in this matter. The
entire Culture of Death has helped by defending the
Partial-Birth Abortion issue in courts and in the
media. Thus, continuously the American public was
forced to focus their attention on this barbaric
procedure. Whenever that happened, the polls tell
us the people overwhelmingly favored the ban on
such cruel procedures.
Now, I only hope you continue to cooperate by helping
us to show that OTHER ABORTION PROCEDURES are also
very gruesome and abominable.
Happy holidays.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig C. Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: President's Radio Address |
15 Dec 2003 09:58:51 PM |
|
|
On 15 Dec 2003 09:46:15 -0800,
"Papa Jack" <papajack@stic.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Papa Jack"<papajack@stic.net> wrote:
On December 13, 2003, the White House Press
Office released a transcript of the President's radio
address.
Big hairy deel. Another boring radio spiel from our
crony-APPOINTED Warmonger-in-Thief. The GOOD
news... only 10 more months of his inept drivel before
we get our chance to OUST him.
Our President shows...
...**his** LACK of...
...compassion by signing [ID&E] Abortion Ban...
Thus PROVING that he doesn't give a rat's *****
for women.
You are, of course, assuming that it is in fact an
ID&E ban. AIUI, it's a Partial Birth Abortion ban --
and is so vaguely worded that it's far from clear to me
that they couldn't misuse the law later to ban various
other procedures.
Good point, Ghost! The purported intention is to ban ID&Es,
but you are right that in reality, it appears to be a case of the
Anti-Choice camel nosing under the tent of abortion rights.
Hopefully, that subterfuge will just make it easier for the
Supreme Court to SCRAP!
You're exactly correct, Craig and Ghost.
WOW, Ghost!! He finally said something that makes SENSE!!
<crappola-snip>
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: President's Radio Address |
19 Dec 2003 02:02:50 AM |
|
|
In talk.abortion, Craig C. Chilton
<>
wrote
on Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:58:51 GMT
<3fe17f89.1778244@netnews.mchsi.com>:
On 15 Dec 2003 09:46:15 -0800,
"Papa Jack" <papajack@stic.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Papa Jack"<papajack@stic.net> wrote:
On December 13, 2003, the White House Press
Office released a transcript of the President's radio
address.
Big hairy deel. Another boring radio spiel from our
crony-APPOINTED Warmonger-in-Thief. The GOOD
news... only 10 more months of his inept drivel before
we get our chance to OUST him.
Our President shows...
...**his** LACK of...
...compassion by signing [ID&E] Abortion Ban...
Thus PROVING that he doesn't give a rat's *****
for women.
You are, of course, assuming that it is in fact an
ID&E ban. AIUI, it's a Partial Birth Abortion ban --
and is so vaguely worded that it's far from clear to me
that they couldn't misuse the law later to ban various
other procedures.
Good point, Ghost! The purported intention is to ban ID&Es,
but you are right that in reality, it appears to be a case of the
Anti-Choice camel nosing under the tent of abortion rights.
Hopefully, that subterfuge will just make it easier for the
Supreme Court to SCRAP!
You're exactly correct, Craig and Ghost.
WOW, Ghost!! He finally said something that makes SENSE!!
Amazing. Now I'm totally confused; I thought PJ was a
pro-lifer who wanted to ban most abortions (except those
necessitated by rape and incest). :-)
PJ, I ask you: did you really want SCOTUS to scrap this law (in
hopes of getting a better one), or are you merely asserting
the correctness of my statement regarding PBA vs. ID&E?
Please clarify. :-)
<crappola-snip>
-- Craig Chilton
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
