| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Frank Arthur" |
| Date: |
02 Dec 2005 03:27:58 PM |
| Object: |
Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
Specifically a gurantee to pay for the medical care for pre-natal care for
the unborn when the mother cannot affort to do so up to and including
childbirth and delivery.
Once born, provide medical care, healthy nutricious food, proper clothing
and an adequate clean quiet environment in which to do school homework.
Either as a supplement
or in its entirety if the mother cannot afford to. In short, to provide an
opportunity for all Americans from conception through childhood until they
are able to provide for an income
for themselves.
.
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
02 Dec 2005 03:54:44 PM |
|
|
"Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com> wrote in message
news:HZ2kf.34169$i7.402@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
Hell no, bozo!
Most of us don't even agree with a fanatical anti-abortion stance!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
02 Dec 2005 06:13:13 PM |
|
|
"ZenIsWhen" <here'slooking@youkid.com> wrote in message
news:11p1gkrrc4hkk9d@corp.supernews.com...
"Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com> wrote in message
news:HZ2kf.34169$i7.402@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
Hell no, bozo!
Most of us don't even agree with a fanatical anti-abortion stance!
Child Hater!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
02 Dec 2005 11:47:26 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"ZenIsWhen" <here'slooking@youkid.com> wrote in message
news:11p1gkrrc4hkk9d@corp.supernews.com...
"Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com> wrote in message
news:HZ2kf.34169$i7.402@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
Hell no, bozo! Most of us don't even agree with a fanatical anti-abortion
stance!
Child Hater!
Typical Wentzkian *****...since you encounter pro-choice parents and
grandparents, even in *your* culture, daily. (That's assuming you're allowed
out in public, of course.) Dale and I have been pro-choice since you were
still learning how to get from point A to point B, so just how is it we're
looking forward to another grandchild next summer?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 7, Cleveland 2 (November 30)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, December 4 vs. Cleveland, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
02 Dec 2005 06:13:29 PM |
|
|
"Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com> wrote in message
news:HZ2kf.34169$i7.402@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
Yes. It would be much better than the GOD DAMNED ***** policy of
supporting GOD DAMNED assholes who create single moms too much.
Is that a good enough answer?
Specifically a gurantee to pay for the medical care for pre-natal care for
the unborn when the mother cannot affort to do so up to and including
childbirth and delivery.
Once born, provide medical care, healthy nutricious food, proper clothing
and an adequate clean quiet environment in which to do school homework.
Either as a supplement
or in its entirety if the mother cannot afford to. In short, to provide an
opportunity for all Americans from conception through childhood until they
are able to provide for an income
for themselves.
Yes.
Bring it on.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
02 Dec 2005 11:51:24 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com> wrote in message
news:HZ2kf.34169$i7.402@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
Yes. It would be much better than the GOD DAMNED ***** policy of
supporting GOD DAMNED assholes who create single moms too much.
You're whining because no woman will let _you_ try and create one.
Is that a good enough answer?
It's to be expected from the Fruitcake of South Carolina.
Specifically a gurantee to pay for the medical care for pre-natal care for
the unborn when the mother cannot affort to do so up to and including
childbirth and delivery.
Once born, provide medical care, healthy nutricious food, proper clothing
and an adequate clean quiet environment in which to do school homework.
Either as a supplement
or in its entirety if the mother cannot afford to. In short, to provide an
opportunity for all Americans from conception through childhood until they
are able to provide for an income
for themselves.
Yes. Bring it on.
Too bad the voters refuse to do as you demand. Might as well get used to your
dreams being gunned down.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 7, Cleveland 2 (November 30)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, December 4 vs. Cleveland, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
03 Dec 2005 01:42:32 AM |
|
|
Frank Arthur <Art@Arthurian.com> wrote:
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
No. It's not about supprting children. It's about punishing women.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nog" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
02 Dec 2005 04:59:59 PM |
|
|
Frank Arthur wrote:
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
Specifically a gurantee to pay for the medical care for pre-natal care for
the unborn when the mother cannot affort to do so up to and including
childbirth and delivery.
Once born, provide medical care, healthy nutricious food, proper clothing
and an adequate clean quiet environment in which to do school homework.
Either as a supplement
or in its entirety if the mother cannot afford to. In short, to provide an
opportunity for all Americans from conception through childhood until they
are able to provide for an income
for themselves.
We do that now. It's called Medicad, food stamps and welfare.
And if the father dies, Social Security kicks in too until the kid is 18.
The mother and each of the kids get a check.
It costs the tax payers dearly. Abortion is cheaper.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
02 Dec 2005 04:41:28 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:27:58 -0500, "Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<HZ2kf.34169$i7.402@bignews2.bellsouth.net> wrote:
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
No.
Specifically a gurantee to pay for the medical care for pre-natal care for
the unborn when the mother cannot affort to do so up to and including
childbirth and delivery.
Once born, provide medical care, healthy nutricious food, proper clothing
and an adequate clean quiet environment in which to do school homework.
Either as a supplement
or in its entirety if the mother cannot afford to. In short, to provide an
opportunity for all Americans from conception through childhood until they
are able to provide for an income
for themselves.
Not a cent.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
02 Dec 2005 06:14:00 PM |
|
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:tbj1p15duttb7c4ssk3i967csdjudpiagt@4ax.com...
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:27:58 -0500, "Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<HZ2kf.34169$i7.402@bignews2.bellsouth.net> wrote:
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
No.
Child Hater!
Specifically a gurantee to pay for the medical care for pre-natal care for
the unborn when the mother cannot affort to do so up to and including
childbirth and delivery.
Once born, provide medical care, healthy nutricious food, proper clothing
and an adequate clean quiet environment in which to do school homework.
Either as a supplement
or in its entirety if the mother cannot afford to. In short, to provide an
opportunity for all Americans from conception through childhood until they
are able to provide for an income
for themselves.
Not a cent.
Child Hater!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
02 Dec 2005 11:48:43 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:tbj1p15duttb7c4ssk3i967csdjudpiagt@4ax.com...
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:27:58 -0500, "Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<HZ2kf.34169$i7.402@bignews2.bellsouth.net> wrote:
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
No.
Child Hater!
Someone kick Wentzky in the head - he's stuck. Again.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 7, Cleveland 2 (November 30)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, December 4 vs. Cleveland, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Protecting the unborn and children-would you? |
03 Dec 2005 04:13:46 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 19:14:00 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<0p5kf.37209$s92.12036@bignews6.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:tbj1p15duttb7c4ssk3i967csdjudpiagt@4ax.com...
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:27:58 -0500, "Frank Arthur" <Art@Arthurian.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<HZ2kf.34169$i7.402@bignews2.bellsouth.net> wrote:
Would Americans be willing to pay additional Federal Income Taxes for the
protection and support of the unborn and children?
No.
Child Hater!
You asked. I answered. If you simply wanted people who agree with
you why did you bother?
Specifically a gurantee to pay for the medical care for pre-natal care for
the unborn when the mother cannot affort to do so up to and including
childbirth and delivery.
Once born, provide medical care, healthy nutricious food, proper clothing
and an adequate clean quiet environment in which to do school homework.
Either as a supplement
or in its entirety if the mother cannot afford to. In short, to provide an
opportunity for all Americans from conception through childhood until they
are able to provide for an income
for themselves.
Not a cent.
Child Hater!
You asked. I answered. If you simply wanted people who agree with
you why did you bother?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
