Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger



 Science > Abortion > Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "J Young"
Date: 23 Dec 2005 09:44:32 PM
Object: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger
It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/orl-purity05dec23,0,6152021.story?coll=sfla-entertainment-headlines
Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger
Young people who choose chastity can slip on a symbol of their vow.
The thin silver band that 17-year-old Katie McMunn wears on her finger is a
placeholder. Someday, she hopes, it will be replaced by a wedding ring. In
the meantime it serves as a daily reminder of a vow she made three years ago
to remain chaste until marriage.
"I want to give all of my body to my husband," McMunn says.
She was 14 when she first slipped on the silver band during a program
promoting abstinence for teenagers, in Pittsburgh. The three-hour event,
called the Silver Ring Thing, featured music videos, comedians and speakers
who introduced an idea McMunn had not considered: that somewhere out there,
her as-yet-undiscovered husband was waiting for her. She was so moved she
took her vow and borrowed $10 from a stranger to buy her ring.
McMunn is among tens of thousands of young people who in the past decade
have taken a chastity vow until marriage and slipped on a ring to symbolize
it. Chastity rings, part of the controversial abstinence-only movement in
sex education, are becoming more mainstream. Also known as purity rings,
they are being purchased by college students, members of church youth groups
and abstinence organizations, and couples who are dating but abstaining.
Some are acquired as part of programs such as the Silver Ring Thing, others
are bought independently.
Once sold mainly in Christian gift shops, the rings are now offered by
retailers such as Zales and Amazon.com. And sellers say business is booming.
"We began selling purity and chastity rings in 2002 and saw a dramatic
increase in interest through 2004," Rebecca Roberts, who offers 48 different
styles of purity rings on AppleFieldDirect.com, wrote in an e-mail message.
This year, she says, she is feeling increasing competition from other
retailers.
The growing visibility of purity rings comes amid a long-running controversy
over the promotion of abstinence in sex-education programs for teenagers.
Critics charge that promoting abstinence as a singular virtue means denying
to teenagers the sex education they need. That means that if someone breaks
the chastity vow, he or she will not know how to avoid contracting sexually
transmitted diseases, they say.
Those who wear and promote the rings argue that abstinence is the only way
to practice truly safe sex. And they would like to spread that message far
and wide. In the next seven years, the Silver Ring Thing, a religion-based
group promoting abstinence, aims to persuade 20 percent of the world's youth
to abstain from sex until marriage, says Denny Pattyn, the group's founder.
In the meantime, purity-ring wearers say that they are beginning to change
youth culture, if ever so slightly.
.

User: "Paul Duca"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 03:20:54 PM
Caesar Squitti sells that crap in Canada.
Also useful to those like J Yo, who need assurance THEY will be the
cherry popper.
Paul
.

User: "Elf M. Sternberg"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 03:32:37 PM
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.

You do understand that follow-up studies have shown that the
Silver Ring program, whatever else it may claim, does not actually
create conditions for abstinence. At best, students who joined the
Silver Ring program put off premarital sex for eighteen months compared
to their peers-- and were less likely to use birth control or STD
prevention techniques when they finally did have sex.
Elf
.
User: "satyr"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 10:51:14 PM
On 24 Dec 2005 13:32:37 -0800, "Elf M. Sternberg" <elf@drizzle.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


You do understand that follow-up studies have shown that the
Silver Ring program, whatever else it may claim, does not actually
create conditions for abstinence. At best, students who joined the
Silver Ring program put off premarital sex for eighteen months compared
to their peers-- and were less likely to use birth control or STD
prevention techniques when they finally did have sex.

Elf

We should note that those joining the Silver Ring program were self
selected and presumably more motivated to keep their virginity in the
first place.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
User: "Mike Painter"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 25 Dec 2005 01:55:20 PM
satyr wrote:

On 24 Dec 2005 13:32:37 -0800, "Elf M. Sternberg" <elf@drizzle.com>
wrote:

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values
promoted by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are
once again becoming a way of life.


You do understand that follow-up studies have shown that the
Silver Ring program, whatever else it may claim, does not actually
create conditions for abstinence. At best, students who joined the
Silver Ring program put off premarital sex for eighteen months
compared to their peers-- and were less likely to use birth control
or STD prevention techniques when they finally did have sex.

Elf


We should note that those joining the Silver Ring program were self
selected and presumably more motivated to keep their virginity in the
first place.

Other studies wrt abstainance programs have also shown people marrying
earlier. It would e interesting to see the divorce rate in this group.

.



User: "Dave Lister"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 23 Dec 2005 10:31:17 PM
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
news:epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values
promoted by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are
once again becoming a way of life.

Except, apparently, for rightards like you who don't believe lying is
wrong.
--
What is wrong with the Republicans?
With Republican George Bush as President we no longer have a leader seeking
to positively inspire Americans to greatness, we have a President for the
first time seeking to govern by the manipulation of our basest and most
irrational fears.
.
User: "ۥR.L.Measures"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 05:06:33 AM
In article <Xns9735D0EB7C6BDretsildivad33hotmail@70.169.32.36>, Dave
Lister <retsildivad33@hotmail.com> wrote:

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
news:epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values
promoted by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are
once again becoming a way of life.


Except, apparently, for rightards like you who don't believe lying is
wrong.

** Their leader does it, so it's got to be okay with God.
--
€ R.L.Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
remove _ from e-mail adr
.


User: "Dale"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 01:11:14 AM
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com...

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values

promoted

by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


http://www.sun-sentinel.com/orl-purity05dec23,0,6152021.story?coll=sfla-entertainment-headlines
What a joke that is. Most of the teens making these purity vows have no
problem with oral or even anal sex. They believe oral and anal sex are not
really sex at all, so it's okay to do it and still claim chastity. The
joke's on you.
.
User: "Dennis Kemmerer"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 04:18:01 PM
"Dale" <dmgreer@nspm.airmail.net> wrote in message
news:mw6rf.37083$dO2.13923@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com...

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values

promoted

by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/orl-purity05dec23,0,6152021.story?coll=sfla-entertainment-headlines

What a joke that is. Most of the teens making these purity vows have no
problem with oral or even anal sex. They believe oral and anal sex are not
really sex at all, so it's okay to do it and still claim chastity. The
joke's on you.

Teen hormones are one of the few things more powerful than religious cult
brainwashing.
I remember seeing a news report recently (I don't recall where it was), that
said that these 'chastity vows' have a success rate of about 12%.
.
User: "No One"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 31 Dec 2005 01:03:12 AM
"Dennis Kemmerer" <dk@suespammers.org> writes:


I remember seeing a news report recently (I don't recall where it was), that
said that these 'chastity vows' have a success rate of about 12%.

And I bet you'll see another news report about how 12% are too clever
to get caught. :-)
.

User: "ۥR.L.Measures"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 06:27:09 PM
In article <tOjrf.35710$BZ5.31444@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, "Dennis
Kemmerer" <dk@suespammers.org> wrote:

"Dale" <dmgreer@nspm.airmail.net> wrote in message
news:mw6rf.37083$dO2.13923@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com...

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values

promoted

by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


http://www.sun-sentinel.com/orl-purity05dec23,0,6152021.story?coll=sfla-entertainment-headlines


What a joke that is. Most of the teens making these purity vows have no
problem with oral or even anal sex. They believe oral and anal sex are not
really sex at all, so it's okay to do it and still claim chastity. The
joke's on you.


Teen hormones are one of the few things more powerful than religious cult
brainwashing.

** That and teenbabe pheromones.
- "The sex drive itself gave organized religion an opportunity to amass
what was indisputably the greatest power ever lodged in human hands"
- Rabbi Abraham Feinberg (1945-1986)
--
€ R.L.Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
remove _ from e-mail adr
.


User: "Paul Duca"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 03:24:42 PM
in article mw6rf.37083$dO2.13923@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net, Dale at
dmgreer@nspm.airmail.net wrote on 12/24/05 2:11 AM:

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com...

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values

promoted

by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


http://www.sun-sentinel.com/orl-purity05dec23,0,6152021.story?coll=sfla-entert
ainment-headlines

What a joke that is. Most of the teens making these purity vows have no
problem with oral or even anal sex. They believe oral and anal sex are not
really sex at all, so it's okay to do it and still claim chastity. The
joke's on you.


-- That's the reason why J Yo likes them so much...
Paul
.


User: "Denis Loubet"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 01:34:36 AM
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com...

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values
promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


http://www.sun-sentinel.com/orl-purity05dec23,0,6152021.story?coll=sfla-entertainment-headlines


Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger

And when it's worn on the *****, it's a ***** ring, so what?
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
User: "ۥR.L.Measures"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 05:10:36 AM
In article <oc-dnRMFgL2UZzHeRVn-tQ@io.com>, "Denis Loubet"
<dloubet@io.com> wrote:

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com...

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values
promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.



http://www.sun-sentinel.com/orl-purity05dec23,0,6152021.story?coll=sfla-entertainment-headlines



Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger


And when it's worn on the *****, it's a ***** ring, so what?

** If these girls were really serious about remaining chaste, they should
get a labia minora ring.
--
€ R.L.Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
remove _ from e-mail adr
.


User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 23 Dec 2005 09:47:36 PM
In article <epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.

I'll bet you believe people actually read the ***** you post.
As for todays [sic] youth, abortions are up under Bush, but they were
down under Clinton.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 01:30:00 AM
David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


I'll bet you believe people actually read the ***** you post.

As for todays [sic] youth, abortions are up under Bush, but they were
down under Clinton.

Lefttards like Barnes thinks that the president is supposed to control
women's reproductive decisions.
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 09:04:50 AM
In article <1135409399.946910.180190@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values
promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


I'll bet you believe people actually read the ***** you post.

As for todays [sic] youth, abortions are up under Bush, but they were
down under Clinton.


Lefttards like Barnes thinks that the president is supposed to control
women's reproductive decisions.

LOL! Not at all. But their policies certainly influence society. For
example, Bush, because he is a "Born Again Christian," has the
government only advise people on abstinence - that encourages
abortions.
The point being, the "pro-life" claim to oppose abortion but they vote
for people who create policy that encourages abortion.
And "Leftard" isn't a word. Stop with the propaganda. If the truth
doesn't support your position, question your position.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 09:08:37 AM
David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135409399.946910.180190@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values
promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


I'll bet you believe people actually read the ***** you post.

As for todays [sic] youth, abortions are up under Bush, but they were
down under Clinton.


Lefttards like Barnes thinks that the president is supposed to control
women's reproductive decisions.


LOL! Not at all. But their policies certainly influence society. For
example, Bush, because he is a "Born Again Christian," has the
government only advise people on abstinence - that encourages
abortions.

You liberals sure do lie a lot. First off, your claim that government
only advise people on absitnence is false.
Second, show the studies that support your claim that teaching
abstinence encourages abortions.
[this space left for Barnes to make some excuse as to why he can't
support his claim and to add more lies]


The point being

You lie
.
User: "james g. keegan jr."

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 26 Dec 2005 01:30:06 PM
In article <1135436917.039134.327130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

You liberals sure do lie a lot.

are you calling yourself a liberal now and referring to your lie shown
below?
"To anyone reading my words let it be known that Mimi Cohen is aka:
Krisblake, Pauline, Gia, Somewriter, and several other nicks."
--"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
news:1130988022.230071.12110@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
.

User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 09:27:34 AM
In article <1135436917.039134.327130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135409399.946910.180190@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values
promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


I'll bet you believe people actually read the ***** you post.

As for todays [sic] youth, abortions are up under Bush, but they were
down under Clinton.


Lefttards like Barnes thinks that the president is supposed to control
women's reproductive decisions.


LOL! Not at all. But their policies certainly influence society. For
example, Bush, because he is a "Born Again Christian," has the
government only advise people on abstinence - that encourages
abortions.


You liberals sure do lie a lot. First off, your claim that government
only advise people on absitnence is false.

Wrong. Here you go:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=631614
And the CDC was ordered to change its website to raise scientifically
questionable doubt about the effectiveness of condoms in preventing the
spread of HIV/AIDS.

Second, show the studies that support your claim that teaching
abstinence encourages abortions.

I never said I was referring to an internet post study for this. Not
everything is on the Internet.
However, read this:
http://www.religiousconsultation.org/News_Tracker/abstinence-only_does_i
t_work.htm


[this space left for Barnes to make some excuse as to why he can't
support his claim and to add more lies]

You are an idiot. I guess that whole, "I ignore Barnes" thing didn't
work for you so you are back peddling on that.
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 09:50:24 AM
David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135436917.039134.327130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135409399.946910.180190@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the values
promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once again
becoming a way of life.


I'll bet you believe people actually read the ***** you post.

As for todays [sic] youth, abortions are up under Bush, but they were
down under Clinton.


Lefttards like Barnes thinks that the president is supposed to control
women's reproductive decisions.


LOL! Not at all. But their policies certainly influence society. For
example, Bush, because he is a "Born Again Christian," has the
government only advise people on abstinence - that encourages
abortions.


You liberals sure do lie a lot. First off, your claim that government
only advise people on absitnence is false.


Wrong. Here you go:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=631614

And the CDC was ordered to change its website to raise scientifically
questionable doubt about the effectiveness of condoms in preventing the
spread of HIV/AIDS.

That doesn't support your original statement, you are moving the
goalpost..this is typical of you.


Second, show the studies that support your claim that teaching
abstinence encourages abortions.


I never said I was referring to an internet post study for this. Not
everything is on the Internet.

So you have nothing to support your claim.
In less than 1 hour your claim was shot down.


However, read this:
http://www.religiousconsultation.org/News_Tracker/abstinence-only_does_i
t_work.htm

Good for you, you are reading..that's a sign of hope.



[this space left for Barnes to make some excuse as to why he can't
support his claim and to add more lies]


You are an idiot.

Imagine that, Barnes calls me a name..oh my.
I guess that whole, "I ignore Barnes" thing didn't

work for you so you are back peddling on that.

Oh don't get your panties wet, I am not interested in any discussions
with you. You are a moron. I just want to show George, and keep it
saved for future reference that you can't back up your claims. The
reprimand claim, you admitted this morning you don't know.
Now you know and I know, no one ever e-mailed you.
How do we know this?
a) No one knows your e-mail address
b) you claimed someone e-mailed you from state e-mail. That's
impossible
c) I have never been reprimaded in Corrections of the Air Force
d) You can't prove what you don't have (which is evidence).
That's all, just enough to soak Georges ego a bit and off you go.
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 09:59:20 AM
In article <1135439424.237960.320100@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135436917.039134.327130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135409399.946910.180190@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the
values
promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once
again
becoming a way of life.


I'll bet you believe people actually read the ***** you post.

As for todays [sic] youth, abortions are up under Bush, but they
were
down under Clinton.


Lefttards like Barnes thinks that the president is supposed to control
women's reproductive decisions.


LOL! Not at all. But their policies certainly influence society. For
example, Bush, because he is a "Born Again Christian," has the
government only advise people on abstinence - that encourages
abortions.


You liberals sure do lie a lot. First off, your claim that government
only advise people on absitnence is false.


Wrong. Here you go:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=631614

And the CDC was ordered to change its website to raise scientifically
questionable doubt about the effectiveness of condoms in preventing the
spread of HIV/AIDS.


That doesn't support your original statement, you are moving the
goalpost..this is typical of you.

The article above did, spud.



Second, show the studies that support your claim that teaching
abstinence encourages abortions.


I never said I was referring to an internet post study for this. Not
everything is on the Internet.


So you have nothing to support your claim.
In less than 1 hour your claim was shot down.

LOL! Osprey believes that if it isn't on the Internet is isn't true!



However, read this:
http://www.religiousconsultation.org/News_Tracker/abstinence-only_does_i
t_work.htm


Good for you, you are reading..that's a sign of hope.

Osprey, I own you. You can't even ignore me without being manipulated
back into your embarrassing situation.




[this space left for Barnes to make some excuse as to why he can't
support his claim and to add more lies]


You are an idiot.


Imagine that, Barnes calls me a name..oh my.


I guess that whole, "I ignore Barnes" thing didn't

work for you so you are back peddling on that.


Oh don't get your panties wet, I am not interested in any discussions
with you. You are a moron. I just want to show George, and keep it
saved for future reference that you can't back up your claims. The
reprimand claim, you admitted this morning you don't know.

I OWN YOU!!!!!


Now you know and I know, no one ever e-mailed you.

I thought you weren't interested in getting into discussions with me.


How do we know this?

I thought you weren't interested in getting into discussions with me!


a) No one knows your e-mail address

They did at the time - go back and look. You are good at that.

b) you claimed someone e-mailed you from state e-mail. That's
impossible

Tell it to those who emailed me. (Osprey thinks e-mail doesn't allow
you to e-mail.)

c) I have never been reprimaded in Corrections of the Air Force

Corrections of the Air Force? What the hell does that mean?

d) You can't prove what you don't have (which is evidence).

I proved it, repeatedly.


That's all, just enough to soak Georges ego a bit and off you go.

Meaning you are a coward who knows every time you go up against be I
kick your *****.
Go away!
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 24 Dec 2005 08:17:03 PM
David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135439424.237960.320100@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135436917.039134.327130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135409399.946910.180190@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the
values
promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are once
again
becoming a way of life.


I'll bet you believe people actually read the ***** you post.

As for todays [sic] youth, abortions are up under Bush, but they
were
down under Clinton.


Lefttards like Barnes thinks that the president is supposed to control
women's reproductive decisions.


LOL! Not at all. But their policies certainly influence society. For
example, Bush, because he is a "Born Again Christian," has the
government only advise people on abstinence - that encourages
abortions.


You liberals sure do lie a lot. First off, your claim that government
only advise people on absitnence is false.


Wrong. Here you go:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=631614

And the CDC was ordered to change its website to raise scientifically
questionable doubt about the effectiveness of condoms in preventing the
spread of HIV/AIDS.


That doesn't support your original statement, you are moving the
goalpost..this is typical of you.


The article above did, spud.

No, moron, it doesn't.



Second, show the studies that support your claim that teaching
abstinence encourages abortions.


I never said I was referring to an internet post study for this. Not
everything is on the Internet.


So you have nothing to support your claim.
In less than 1 hour your claim was shot down.


LOL! Osprey believes that if it isn't on the Internet is isn't true!

No, Osprey believes that you make ***** up you can't back up..:o)
It's been proven time after time. You are a liar.




However, read this:
http://www.religiousconsultation.org/News_Tracker/abstinence-only_does_i
t_work.htm


Good for you, you are reading..that's a sign of hope.


Osprey, I own you.

Sorry but the 13th Amendment abolished that. You need to get over this
delusion.
For someone who claims to be a lawyer, you come off as an *****.
No wonder so many don't like you.
You can't even ignore me without being manipulated

back into your embarrassing situation.

First you want me to respond to you, then you want me to ignore you.
Do you know what you want?





[this space left for Barnes to make some excuse as to why he can't
support his claim and to add more lies]


You are an idiot.


Imagine that, Barnes calls me a name..oh my.


I guess that whole, "I ignore Barnes" thing didn't

work for you so you are back peddling on that.


Oh don't get your panties wet, I am not interested in any discussions
with you. You are a moron. I just want to show George, and keep it
saved for future reference that you can't back up your claims. The
reprimand claim, you admitted this morning you don't know.


I OWN YOU!!!!!

There you go David...show your true self..that's exactly what I hoped
you would do..:o)



Now you know and I know, no one ever e-mailed you.


I thought you weren't interested in getting into discussions with me.

I am only interested in showing you are an ***** and a liar. I have
accomplished both of those tasks..:o)



How do we know this?


I thought you weren't interested in getting into discussions with me!


a) No one knows your e-mail address


They did at the time - go back and look. You are good at that.

No, sorry but they didn't.


b) you claimed someone e-mailed you from state e-mail. That's
impossible


Tell it to those who emailed me. (Osprey thinks e-mail doesn't allow
you to e-mail.)

Tell that to the state system. It's impossible, the state e-mail
system doesn't e-mail outside the server. Very few people have that
priviledge...people like Commissioners, and so forth.


c) I have never been reprimaded in Corrections of the Air Force


Corrections of the Air Force? What the hell does that mean?

minor typo
I have never been reprimanded in Corrections or in the Air Force


d) You can't prove what you don't have (which is evidence).


I proved it, repeatedly.

You mean you lied, repeatedly. Get it right.


That's all, just enough to soak Georges ego a bit and off you go.


Meaning you are a coward who knows every time you go up against be I
kick your *****.

You need to stop sniffing that powder, it's rotting what's left of your
small mind.


Go away!

No!
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 26 Dec 2005 10:12:08 AM
In article <1135477023.830617.273220@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135439424.237960.320100@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135436917.039134.327130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <1135409399.946910.180190@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <epadnX5pNp5wXjHenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, J

Young

<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

It is refreshing to know that todays youth are rejecting the
values
promoted
by the LLL (Liberal Looney Left). Morality and decency are

once

again
becoming a way of life.


I'll bet you believe people actually read the ***** you post.

As for todays [sic] youth, abortions are up under Bush, but they
were
down under Clinton.


Lefttards like Barnes thinks that the president is supposed to
control
women's reproductive decisions.


LOL! Not at all. But their policies certainly influence society.
For
example, Bush, because he is a "Born Again Christian," has the
government only advise people on abstinence - that encourages
abortions.


You liberals sure do lie a lot. First off, your claim that government
only advise people on absitnence is false.


Wrong. Here you go:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=631614

And the CDC was ordered to change its website to raise scientifically
questionable doubt about the effectiveness of condoms in preventing the
spread of HIV/AIDS.


That doesn't support your original statement, you are moving the
goalpost..this is typical of you.


The article above did, spud.


No, moron, it doesn't.




Second, show the studies that support your claim that teaching
abstinence encourages abortions.


I never said I was referring to an internet post study for this. Not
everything is on the Internet.


So you have nothing to support your claim.
In less than 1 hour your claim was shot down.


LOL! Osprey believes that if it isn't on the Internet is isn't true!


No, Osprey believes that you make ***** up you can't back up..:o)

It's been proven time after time. You are a liar.





However, read this:
http://www.religiousconsultation.org/News_Tracker/abstinence-only_does_i
t_work.htm


Good for you, you are reading..that's a sign of hope.


Osprey, I own you.


Sorry but the 13th Amendment abolished that. You need to get over this
delusion.

Stop pretending you understand the Constitution. You don't. Hell, you
didn't even understand the 4th Amendment.

For someone who claims to be a lawyer, you come off as an *****.
No wonder so many don't like you.

I am beloved.



You can't even ignore me without being manipulated

back into your embarrassing situation.


First you want me to respond to you, then you want me to ignore you.
Do you know what you want?

I never wanted or didn't want you to respond to me. You responding is
irrelevant. You serve your purpose every time you say anything - to me
or others.






[this space left for Barnes to make some excuse as to why he can't
support his claim and to add more lies]


You are an idiot.


Imagine that, Barnes calls me a name..oh my.


I guess that whole, "I ignore Barnes" thing didn't

work for you so you are back peddling on that.


Oh don't get your panties wet, I am not interested in any discussions
with you. You are a moron. I just want to show George, and keep it
saved for future reference that you can't back up your claims. The
reprimand claim, you admitted this morning you don't know.


I OWN YOU!!!!!


There you go David...show your true self..that's exactly what I hoped
you would do..:o)

And you show your true self. Everyone here but you, apparently, knows
what I mean by that. But you, the ignorant fool, doesn't get it.





Now you know and I know, no one ever e-mailed you.


I thought you weren't interested in getting into discussions with me.


I am only interested in showing you are an ***** and a liar. I have
accomplished both of those tasks..:o)

By simply denying the truth. Maybe in your world...





How do we know this?


I thought you weren't interested in getting into discussions with me!


a) No one knows your e-mail address


They did at the time - go back and look. You are good at that.


No, sorry but they didn't.

So you are an idiot.



b) you claimed someone e-mailed you from state e-mail. That's
impossible


Tell it to those who emailed me. (Osprey thinks e-mail doesn't allow
you to e-mail.)


Tell that to the state system. It's impossible, the state e-mail
system doesn't e-mail outside the server. Very few people have that
priviledge...people like Commissioners, and so forth.

Well these people did.




c) I have never been reprimaded in Corrections of the Air Force


Corrections of the Air Force? What the hell does that mean?


minor typo

Sure


I have never been reprimanded in Corrections or in the Air Force

Well your co-workers sure think you were - talk to them about it.




d) You can't prove what you don't have (which is evidence).


I proved it, repeatedly.


You mean you lied, repeatedly. Get it right.

You denying the truth doesn't make something untrue.



That's all, just enough to soak Georges ego a bit and off you go.


Meaning you are a coward who knows every time you go up against me I
kick your *****.


You need to stop sniffing that powder, it's rotting what's left of your
small mind.

You obviously have no shame.



Go away!


No!

LOL!!! I own you...
.
User: "Gaia"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 26 Dec 2005 01:47:03 PM
We all own a share of the little twirp.
.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 27 Dec 2005 12:35:05 AM
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:

We all own a share of the little twirp.

True, but who in their right mind would trade for it *or* want to buy it? ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 7, San Antonio 1 (December 26)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, December 28 vs. Iowa, 7:05
.
User: "Gaia"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 27 Dec 2005 03:48:11 AM
On 27 Dec 2005 00:35:05 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:

"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:

We all own a share of the little twirp.


True, but who in their right mind would trade for it *or* want to buy it? ;-)

We could burn it or feed it all to the plethora of trolls who've
unloaded into the newsgroup, over the weekend...
.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 27 Dec 2005 07:50:48 AM
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:

On 27 Dec 2005 00:35:05 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:

"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:

We all own a share of the little twirp.

True, but who in their right mind would trade for it *or* want to buy it?
;-)

We could burn it or feed it all to the plethora of trolls who've
unloaded into the newsgroup, over the weekend...

At least we could get a better determination of the LD 50 dose...;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 7, San Antonio 1 (December 26)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, December 28 vs. Iowa, 7:05
.



User: "Mimi Cohen"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 26 Dec 2005 03:09:47 PM
Gaia wrote:

We all own a share of the little twirp.

You can have my share, I certainly don't want it :)
.
User: "Gaia"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 26 Dec 2005 03:13:51 PM
Mimi Cohen wrote:

Gaia wrote:

We all own a share of the little twirp.


You can have my share, I certainly don't want it :)

I didn't say we had to keep it.
Thanks, but no thanks.
:-)
.
User: "Mimi Cohen"

Title: Re: Purity ring -- a stop-sign that's worn on your finger 26 Dec 2005 07:40:50 PM
Gaia wrote:

Mimi Cohen wrote:

Gaia wrote:

We all own a share of the little twirp.


You can have my share, I certainly don't want it :)



I didn't say we had to keep it.

Thanks, but no thanks.
:-)

I know; let's give both our parts to Patrick! :)
.














  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
Re: Muslim veils originally worn by prostitutes
Fathers, daughters gather to pledge 'purity'
Wearing 'purity rings' is banned at girls' school
Teens Promote Purity on Valentine's Day
The Fires Of Hell Shall Lick Your Body Clean!
No such thing as Christian hate group or pro choice/"pro change-your-mind" Christian.
AWOL Bush Askes For Another 25 BILLION of YOUR $$$ For Iraq (Remeber that NeoCon "Cakewalk" Lie?)
"Yep. It's had your mother's nose for sure"
Watch your baby grow inside you
Re: Let Me Allay Your Fears. Republicans Aren't Fascists, You're Just Crazy
Next Supreme Court Justice: Affirmation of Liberty, or Unthinkable Tyranny will Result. YOUR Call on Nov. 2nd!
HEAD'S UP, OREGONIANS!! Watch CBS News tonight!! ASScroft is after your Rights... AGAIN!!
Provide your details and get ready
=?iso-8859-1?q?Good_morning_or_good_evening_depending_upon_your_location._I_want_to_ask_you_the_most_important_question_of_your_life._Your_joy_or_sorrow_for_all_eternity_depends_upon_your_answer._The_question_is:_Are_you_saved=3F_It_is_not_a_question
=?iso-8859-1?q?Good_morning_or_good_evening_depending_upon_your_location._I_want_to_ask_you_the_most_important_question_of_your_life._Your_joy_or_sorrow_for_all_eternity_depends_upon_your_answer._The_question_is:_Are_you_saved=3F_It_is_not_a_question
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER