| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
24 Apr 2006 10:43:19 PM |
| Object: |
Push for national gay-marriage ban |
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
WASHINGTON, April 24 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic leaders and evangelical
Protestants, joined by other religious groups, are pushing to amend the U.S.
Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
As a kickoff, the group signed a petition in support of an amendment, The
New York Times reported. Those who added their names included seven Catholic
cardinals, a number of archbishops, some Orthodox Jewish rabbis and at least
one official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
One Catholic group -- the Knights of Columbus -- plans to distribute 10
million postcards at Catholic churches for congregants to send to their
congressional representatives.
"The personal involvement of bishops and cardinals is significantly greater
this time than in 2004," said Patrick Korten, a spokesman for the lay
Catholic group.
In 2004, proposed amendments to state constitutions on homosexual marriage
helped bring out conservative voters and may have contributed to President
George W. Bush's victory over Sen.. John Kerry.
But some political observers say that the public attitude toward the issue
has shifted with a recent poll finding 51 percent of respondents opposed,
compared to 63 percent in 2004.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 10:55:48 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 02:00:03 PM |
|
|
On 25 Apr 2006 15:55:48 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda. That's the
bright side, huh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "goldielocks" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 02:20:20 PM |
|
|
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda. That's the
bright side, huh?
To what purpose? They will only be repealed again when the country
wakes up from the insanity of right-wing fundamentalism?
*/*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 06:46:26 PM |
|
|
On 25 Apr 2006 12:20:20 -0700, "goldielocks"
<dancing_taoist@yahoo.com> wrote:
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda. That's the
bright side, huh?
To what purpose? They will only be repealed again when the country
wakes up from the insanity of right-wing fundamentalism?
*/*
<SNIGGER>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 08:42:37 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 10:12:49 PM |
|
|
On 26 Apr 2006 01:42:37 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
April 25, 2006
Federal court upholds military's antigay policy
A federal judge with the U.S. district court for the district of
Massachusetts on Monday dismissed a lawsuit filed by 12 service
members challenging the military's antigay "don't ask, don't tell"
policy. The ban, established in 1993 under the Clinton administration,
prohibits the military from asking about the sexual orientation of
service members but requires discharge of those who acknowledge being
gay or engaging in homosexual activity.
The service members had argued that the policy violates their
constitutional rights to privacy, free speech, and equal protection
under the law. However, in court documents the Bush administration
argued that Congress, in approving "don't ask, don't tell," recognized
that the military is characterized by its own rules and traditions,
including some restrictions that would not be accepted in civilian
society.
The policy "rationally furthers the government's interest in
maintaining unit cohesion, reducing sexual tensions, and promoting
personal privacy," the government argued.
U.S. district judge George A. O'Toole Jr. on Monday dismissed the
suit, brought by the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network on behalf of
the 12. "We are disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing
all possible responses," said C. Dixon Osburn, executive director for
SLDN. "We continue to believe the military's ban is un-American and
unconstitutional. There is no reason lesbian, gay, and bisexual
Americans should be prohibited from serving our country."
"Don't ask, don't tell" has been upheld by appeals courts in several
other jurisdictions. One of the reasons SLDN filed the lawsuit in
Boston is that the appeals court there—the first circuit—has never
been asked to rule in a case involving the policy. (AP, with
additional reporting by The Advocate)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 11:24:59 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On 26 Apr 2006 01:42:37 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
April 25, 2006
Federal court upholds military's antigay policy
A federal judge with the U.S. district court for the district of
Who cares? 100 years ago this case wouldn't even have made it to
court. Today its being openly considered by many people. Your fellow
bigots are now in the position of having to justify your bigotry, and
you are losing ground.
--
Ray Fischer
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 10:42:37 AM |
|
|
On 26 Apr 2006 04:24:59 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On 26 Apr 2006 01:42:37 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
April 25, 2006
Federal court upholds military's antigay policy
A federal judge with the U.S. district court for the district of
Who cares? 100 years ago this case wouldn't even have made it to
court. Today its being openly considered by many people. Your fellow
bigots are now in the position of having to justify your bigotry, and
you are losing ground.
I don't call stomping a mud hole in your opponent's ***** every time he
challenges you, "Losing Ground", boy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 11:33:53 AM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On 26 Apr 2006 04:24:59 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
On 26 Apr 2006 01:42:37 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
April 25, 2006
Federal court upholds military's antigay policy
A federal judge with the U.S. district court for the district of
Who cares? 100 years ago this case wouldn't even have made it to
court. Today its being openly considered by many people. Your fellow
bigots are now in the position of having to justify your bigotry, and
you are losing ground.
I don't call stomping a mud hole in your opponent's ***** every time he
challenges you, "Losing Ground", boy.
Then you are most definititely losing ground, since that is what we are
doing to you. "Stomping a mud hole in [your] ***** every time [you]
challenge [us]." It is certainly that you have not been able to
support your hatred and bigotry at all. All you have is your biased
and unintelligent opinions, while we have a mountain of facts and a sea
of compassion and tolerance. And since you have no facts, your
"challenges" fail completely and utterly.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 10:48:06 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:42:37 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the stupidity of nym thief
BILL TAYLOR <abuse@easynews.com>
I should call getting a mud hole stomped in my ***** every time I
post "Losing Ground", and I like "boys."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 08:23:32 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:48:06 -0700, Bonnie B <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad>
wrote:
I like "boys" AND "girls."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 09:57:40 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:23:32 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the stupidity of nym thief
BILL TAYLOR <abuse@easynews.com>
I like "boys"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 02:22:59 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On 25 Apr 2006 15:55:48 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
And those laws have a tendency of violating the Supreme Law of this
land, the US Constitution. And therefore challenged and overturned.
That's the bright side, huh?
No. The dark side. Those laws are based on intolerance and bigotry,
and thus they cannot be allowed to stand. They are in opposition of
everything that this country supposedly stands for, and the ideals
embodied within our Constitution and our history.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 06:53:29 PM |
|
|
On 25 Apr 2006 12:22:59 -0700, "Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On 25 Apr 2006 15:55:48 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
And those laws have a tendency of violating the Supreme Law of this
land, the US Constitution. And therefore challenged and overturned.
There has yet to be a state law over turned that dealt with the
prevention of SSM. You're lying in your teeth.
That's the bright side, huh?
No. The dark side. Those laws are based on intolerance and bigotry,
A right guaranteed all Americans.
and thus they cannot be allowed to stand.
Hide and watch.They'll be here long, long after you are in your dirt
bed, boy.
They are in opposition of everything that this country supposedly stands for, and the ideals
embodied within our Constitution and our history.
You are as wrong headed as they come. They demonstrate several of the
elements that makes this country great -- Freedom of thought, Freedom
of speech, the right to criticize that which deserves to be
criticized. All things that bust the homosexuals chops.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 08:05:11 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On 25 Apr 2006 12:22:59 -0700, "Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On 25 Apr 2006 15:55:48 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
And those laws have a tendency of violating the Supreme Law of this
land, the US Constitution. And therefore challenged and overturned.
There has yet to be a state law over turned that dealt with the
prevention of SSM. You're lying in your teeth.
Except in Mass., Vermont, and soon Maryland. I am not the one that is
lying here.
That's the bright side, huh?
No. The dark side. Those laws are based on intolerance and bigotry,
A right guaranteed all Americans.
If a law is based on intolerance and bigotry, then it is not guaranteed
to all Americans by definition. And since the law in most states
prevent homosexuals, and refuse to recognize legal homosexual marriages
from other states in contradiction of the U.S. Constitution, marriage
is not a right that is guaranteed to all Americans.
and thus they cannot be allowed to stand.
Hide and watch.
No. I shall stand up and fight for the rights of others. Something
that seems to be beyond the reach of your wizen heart.
They'll be here long, long after you are in your dirt
bed, boy.
Unlikely. The tide is already turning against the intolerance that
people like you revel in. Soon, homosexuals will obtain the equal
rights that they should already have. They laws that exist that
discriminate against them will soon be overturned.
They are in opposition of everything that this country supposedly stands for, and the ideals
embodied within our Constitution and our history.
You are as wrong headed as they come.
Actually, that would be you. I am very much in my right mind. That is
why I can see the inequality and intolerance for what it is. I have
yet to see any reason to deny homosexuals the right to marry the
consenting adult of his or her choice in the same manner that
homosexuals can that does not reduce down to "Because I don't like
homosexuals" or "Because I say so", neither of which is sufficient
reason.
They demonstrate several of the
elements that makes this country great -- Freedom of thought, Freedom
of speech, the right to criticize that which deserves to be
criticized.
And people like you are those that deserve to be criticized. You do
not believe in freedom or equality, the cornerstones of this country.
There is nothing about homosexuality in and of itself that deserves
criticism.
All things that bust the homosexuals chops.
No. Those freedoms bust bigoted, intolerant people like you in the
chops. You cannot shut up people that are right-minded and
egalitarians from pointing out the inequalities that currently exist,
nor can you prevent us from righting the wrongs that you wish to
perpetuate.
Mark Sebree
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 10:07:52 PM |
|
|
On 25 Apr 2006 18:05:11 -0700, "Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On 25 Apr 2006 12:22:59 -0700, "Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On 25 Apr 2006 15:55:48 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
And those laws have a tendency of violating the Supreme Law of this
land, the US Constitution. And therefore challenged and overturned.
There has yet to be a state law over turned that dealt with the
prevention of SSM. You're lying in your teeth.
Except in Mass., Vermont, and soon Maryland. I am not the one that is
lying here.
That's the bright side, huh?
No. The dark side. Those laws are based on intolerance and bigotry,
A right guaranteed all Americans.
If a law is based on intolerance and bigotry, then it is not guaranteed
to all Americans by definition. And since the law in most states
prevent homosexuals, and refuse to recognize legal homosexual marriages
from other states in contradiction of the U.S. Constitution, marriage
is not a right that is guaranteed to all Americans.
and thus they cannot be allowed to stand.
Hide and watch.
No. I shall stand up and fight for the rights of others. Something
that seems to be beyond the reach of your wizen heart.
They'll be here long, long after you are in your dirt
bed, boy.
Unlikely. The tide is already turning against the intolerance that
people like you revel in. Soon, homosexuals will obtain the equal
rights that they should already have. They laws that exist that
discriminate against them will soon be overturned.
They are in opposition of everything that this country supposedly stands for, and the ideals
embodied within our Constitution and our history.
You are as wrong headed as they come.
Actually, that would be you. I am very much in my right mind. That is
why I can see the inequality and intolerance for what it is. I have
yet to see any reason to deny homosexuals the right to marry the
consenting adult of his or her choice in the same manner that
homosexuals can that does not reduce down to "Because I don't like
homosexuals" or "Because I say so", neither of which is sufficient
reason.
They demonstrate several of the
elements that makes this country great -- Freedom of thought, Freedom
of speech, the right to criticize that which deserves to be
criticized.
And people like you are those that deserve to be criticized. You do
not believe in freedom or equality, the cornerstones of this country.
There is nothing about homosexuality in and of itself that deserves
criticism.
All things that bust the homosexuals chops.
No. Those freedoms bust bigoted, intolerant people like you in the
chops. You cannot shut up people that are right-minded and
egalitarians from pointing out the inequalities that currently exist,
nor can you prevent us from righting the wrongs that you wish to
perpetuate.
April 25, 2006
Federal court upholds military's antigay policy
A federal judge with the U.S. district court for the district of
Massachusetts on Monday dismissed a lawsuit filed by 12 service
members challenging the military's antigay "don't ask, don't tell"
policy. The ban, established in 1993 under the Clinton administration,
prohibits the military from asking about the sexual orientation of
service members but requires discharge of those who acknowledge being
gay or engaging in homosexual activity.
The service members had argued that the policy violates their
constitutional rights to privacy, free speech, and equal protection
under the law. However, in court documents the Bush administration
argued that Congress, in approving "don't ask, don't tell," recognized
that the military is characterized by its own rules and traditions,
including some restrictions that would not be accepted in civilian
society.
The policy "rationally furthers the government's interest in
maintaining unit cohesion, reducing sexual tensions, and promoting
personal privacy," the government argued.
U.S. district judge George A. O'Toole Jr. on Monday dismissed the
suit, brought by the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network on behalf of
the 12. "We are disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing
all possible responses," said C. Dixon Osburn, executive director for
SLDN. "We continue to believe the military's ban is un-American and
unconstitutional. There is no reason lesbian, gay, and bisexual
Americans should be prohibited from serving our country."
"Don't ask, don't tell" has been upheld by appeals courts in several
other jurisdictions. One of the reasons SLDN filed the lawsuit in
Boston is that the appeals court there—the first circuit—has never
been asked to rule in a case involving the policy. (AP, with
additional reporting by The Advocate)
Mark Sebree
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
24 Apr 2006 11:00:38 PM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly oppose?
The latest polls show that in California same-sex marriage has about 50/50
support - the numbers have shifted substantially since Proposition 22 was
passed. That we were at the break even point was even mentioned in a
letter to the editor by a spokescritter for the San Francisco branch of
the Republican Party (and his letter was intended to support Arnold when
he vetoed a bill allowing same-sex marriages). He tried to spin it by
saying that it should be decided by another initiative (which, of course,
is very expensive to do).
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
WASHINGTON, April 24 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic leaders and evangelical
Protestants, joined by other religious groups, are pushing to amend the U.S.
Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
I'd say it is time to do something about the Loony Religious Right Wing
and we can start by eliminating the tax-exempt status these religious
groups get. If they want to ammend the U.S. Constitution, they can
pay for their lobbying out of after-tax dollars like everyone else.
Sure the Catholics and Evangelicals will scream about losing their
boon, but if they want to alter our system of government, that's just
too bad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fooj" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
24 Apr 2006 11:51:20 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
The latest polls show that in California same-sex marriage has about 50/50
support - the numbers have shifted substantially since Proposition 22 was
passed. That we were at the break even point was even mentioned in a
letter to the editor by a spokescritter for the San Francisco branch of
the Republican Party (and his letter was intended to support Arnold when
he vetoed a bill allowing same-sex marriages). He tried to spin it by
saying that it should be decided by another initiative (which, of course,
is very expensive to do).
Alot of homos don't care about same-sex marriage. What makes you think
you have an accurate poll given this fact?
*snip old news*
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
24 Apr 2006 11:31:13 PM |
|
|
"Americans do not want same-sex marriage. "
Oh, you mean the same way they didn't want female suffrage and civil
rights for nonwhites? Those damn fags. First the negroes, then the
broads, now those darn gay people think they have the right to equal
protection under the law. What is the world comin to when you can't
say bugger all to the Constitution and create an underclass of
citizens? ::rollseyes::
The United States government is an extension of the will of The
People, but also an entity that protects political/ethnic/ideological
minorities, a segment of The People from violation of their rights.
From the fourteenth amendment of the US Constitution:
".....nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 06:55:43 PM |
|
|
<sjmcarter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145939473.478956.8030@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"Americans do not want same-sex marriage. "
Oh, you mean the same way they didn't want female suffrage and civil
rights for nonwhites?
That is definitely not the reason.
Those damn fags.
You typed it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 07:38:50 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
<sjmcarter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145939473.478956.8030@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"Americans do not want same-sex marriage. "
Oh, you mean the same way they didn't want female suffrage and civil
rights for nonwhites?
That is definitely not the reason.
You don't speak for any Americans other than yourself...and you've ably
demonstrated that your opinions have very little to do with reality.
Those damn fags.
You typed it.
....and you're obsessed by it. You'd better stay at home, because otherwise
you'd likely cross paths with someone from Anderson's gay community (which
does exist, your delusions to the contrary notwithstanding).
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 6, Peoria 1 (April 24)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, April 26 at Peoria, 7:05 (Game 4)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 06:51:02 AM |
|
|
<sjmcarter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145939473.478956.8030@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"Americans do not want same-sex marriage. "
Oh, you mean the same way they didn't want female suffrage and civil
rights for nonwhites? Those damn fags. First the negroes, then the
broads, now those darn gay people think they have the right to equal
protection under the law. What is the world comin to when you can't
say bugger all to the Constitution and create an underclass of
citizens? ::rollseyes::
The United States government is an extension of the will of The
People, but also an entity that protects political/ethnic/ideological
minorities, a segment of The People from violation of their rights.
From the fourteenth amendment of the US Constitution:
".....nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws."
Which would automatically ban some things that are in effect here, such as
corporate hypocrite measures rather than following the law for all the
people in the USA.
What you forgot is the mandate that disallows transgressing the majority.
Look up Control of the Minority Faction. The validity of Control of the
Minority Faction is as just as Control of the Majority Faction; for, it
seeks to ensure that that equal protections are not removed from members of
either group.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 08:29:26 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
<sjmcarter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145939473.478956.8030@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"Americans do not want same-sex marriage. "
Oh, you mean the same way they didn't want female suffrage and civil
rights for nonwhites? Those damn fags. First the negroes, then the
broads, now those darn gay people think they have the right to equal
protection under the law. What is the world comin to when you can't
say bugger all to the Constitution and create an underclass of
citizens? ::rollseyes::
The United States government is an extension of the will of The
People, but also an entity that protects political/ethnic/ideological
minorities, a segment of The People from violation of their rights.
From the fourteenth amendment of the US Constitution:
".....nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws."
Which would automatically ban some things that are in effect here, such as
corporate hypocrite measures rather than following the law for all the
people in the USA.
What you forgot is the mandate that disallows transgressing the majority.
What you forgot is most of reality. Exactly where is that mandate? (Point
out the wording that supposedly supports your fantasy.)
Look up Control of the Minority Faction. The validity of Control of the
Minority Faction is as just as Control of the Majority Faction; for, it
seeks to ensure that that equal protections are not removed from members of
either group.
Put the crack pipe down, Wentzky.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 6, Peoria 1 (April 24)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, April 26 at Peoria, 7:05 (Game 4)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matty" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 03:58:16 AM |
|
|
wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of
a few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than
totalitarian government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so
firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
Interesting how all those countries that have either same sex marriage or
recognise same sex unions don't seem to be ladened with the same social
problems that the US has.
Matty
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 08:47:04 AM |
|
|
"Matty" <kaiwai_gardiner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:xwl3g.16740$JZ1.630568@news.xtra.co.nz...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede
the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will
of
a few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than
totalitarian government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so
firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
Interesting how all those countries that have either same sex marriage or
recognise same sex unions don't seem to be ladened with the same social
problems that the US has.
Matty
we've had it here for a couple of months - still waiting for that "wrath of
god".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 02:50:05 PM |
|
|
"kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in message
news:dNOdnbIVCdvCtdPZnZ2dnUVZ8tydnZ2d@bt.com...
"Matty" <kaiwai_gardiner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:xwl3g.16740$JZ1.630568@news.xtra.co.nz...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede
the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will
of
a few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than
totalitarian government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so
firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
Interesting how all those countries that have either same sex marriage or
recognise same sex unions don't seem to be ladened with the same social
problems that the US has.
Ala France and the demonstrations?
LOL!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fooj" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 08:36:00 AM |
|
|
Matty wrote:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of
a few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than
totalitarian government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so
firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
Interesting how all those countries that have either same sex marriage or
recognise same sex unions don't seem to be ladened with the same social
problems that the US has.
Most european countries don't have the same immigration and law
enforcement on the scale we do. So your whole analysis is bogus.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 09:16:13 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:58:16 +1200, Matty <kaiwai_gardiner@yahoo.com>
wrote:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of
a few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than
totalitarian government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so
firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
Interesting how all those countries that have either same sex marriage or
recognise same sex unions don't seem to be ladened with the same social
problems that the US has.
You worry about the sheep population in New Zealand, boy, the US will
take care of its societal business as well as continuing to support
your little island nation's failing economy with low interest loans
Matty
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Conspiracy of Doves" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
24 Apr 2006 11:41:42 PM |
|
|
wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
WASHINGTON, April 24 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic leaders and evangelical
Protestants, joined by other religious groups, are pushing to amend the U.S.
Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
As a kickoff, the group signed a petition in support of an amendment, The
New York Times reported. Those who added their names included seven Catholic
cardinals, a number of archbishops, some Orthodox Jewish rabbis and at least
one official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
One Catholic group -- the Knights of Columbus -- plans to distribute 10
million postcards at Catholic churches for congregants to send to their
congressional representatives.
"The personal involvement of bishops and cardinals is significantly greater
this time than in 2004," said Patrick Korten, a spokesman for the lay
Catholic group.
In 2004, proposed amendments to state constitutions on homosexual marriage
helped bring out conservative voters and may have contributed to President
George W. Bush's victory over Sen.. John Kerry.
But some political observers say that the public attitude toward the issue
has shifted with a recent poll finding 51 percent of respondents opposed,
compared to 63 percent in 2004.
Please explain what business it is of yours, or any other heterosexual,
if homosexuals want to get married.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fooj" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
24 Apr 2006 11:52:55 PM |
|
|
Conspiracy of Doves wrote:
Please explain what business it is of yours, or any other heterosexual,
if homosexuals want to get married.
Why is same-sex marriage even necessary?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
