| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"ritpg" |
| Date: |
03 Aug 2006 08:56:01 AM |
| Object: |
Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
I predicted the failure of Air America when it was announced. At the
time I said that liberals aren't interested in or capable of discussing
facts and that because there are only so many ways to say "because I
say so" this bastion of left wing thought, would never last. Well I
must admit it's lasted longer than I expected. Is that because I was
wrong about the reasons the network would fail. Absolutely not. What
I was wrong about was the depths to which people like George Sorros
would reach into their pockets in a futile attempt to save this
inherently flawed attempt at countering Rush Limbaugh, Michael Reagan,
and all the other highly successful conservative radio talk show hosts.
As a confirmed conservative myself, I've got to say this scenario has
turned out to be better than I had hoped. Not only is Air America
experience a most painful - and deserved - death, it's bankrupting
people like Sorros. It just doesn't get any better than that.
New Your Post, Aug. 3, 2006
THE liberal Air America radio network is going to be harder to hear in
New York.
Next month, it is switching stations - to a weaker AM station, WWRL
(1600 AM).
Al Franken and his lefty colleagues are leaving WLIB (1190 AM)
apparently because they couldn't come up with enough cash for the
owners, former Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton and his son,
Pierre.
Starting Sept. 1, Air America will be on WWRL, at the top of the dial
where AM signals are weakest - especially at night, when greater FCC
restrictions apply.
As The Post reported last March, the ratings-challenged liberal network
failed to renew its two-year lease with the Suttons.
Relations between the Suttons and the network's execs were rocky from
the start and only got worse after the network's shaky finances became
known and a scandal broke out involving loans to Air America from a
Bronx charity.
WLIB's future after Sept. 1 is not known, although radio industry
heavyweight Randy Michaels - the builder of 1,200-station Clear Channel
- has expressed interest in leasing the station as a base for a new
talk-radio network.
Michaels declined comment yesterday and the Suttons didn't return calls.
.
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
11 Aug 2006 08:20:35 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
You've got the wrong Fischer, Jack. This one is a deadbeat.
Only a deadbeat loser would make false claims.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
14 Aug 2006 10:52:21 PM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
He doesn't even know what a facist is. It's just a word that he read
somewhere.
Although fascist parties and movements differed significantly from
each other, they had many characteristics in common, including
extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy
and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social
hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a
Volksgemeinschaft (German: "people's community"), in which
individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the
nation.
Brittanica
And you, sir, are a socialist.
Not even.
What would one expect from someone who
cries for redistribution of wealth
Would that be you? After all, YOU are the one demanding that people
do as you say in order to benefit who you say should be helped.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
15 Aug 2006 07:52:31 AM |
|
|
The irony is striking, folks. He just described himself and can't see
it.
To him loyalty and patriotism is "extreme militaristic nationalism".
"Contempt for electoral democracy" - he's a Michael Moore fan. Need I
say more?
"Political and cultural liberalism". He thinks eugenics is a matter of
inevitable tradition.
"A belief in natural social hierarchy". I guess this means he believes
in an unnatural social hierarchy. Now what could that be? Perhaps no
hierearchy at all. Everyone is the same. Sound familiar to anyone?
To this guy moral grounding constitutes elitism.
And finally, this guy believes that one person should have the same
influence as many. The common good is a totally foreign concept to
him.
You know, the more I listen to the guy, the more I agree that he's no
socialist. He's a communist. Read Marx and compare it to what he
says. Scarey.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
He doesn't even know what a facist is. It's just a word that he read
somewhere.
Although fascist parties and movements differed significantly from
each other, they had many characteristics in common, including
extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy
and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social
hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a
Volksgemeinschaft (German: "people's community"), in which
individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the
nation.
Brittanica
And you, sir, are a socialist.
Not even.
What would one expect from someone who
cries for redistribution of wealth
Would that be you? After all, YOU are the one demanding that people
do as you say in order to benefit who you say should be helped.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
16 Aug 2006 01:51:20 AM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
The irony is striking, folks. He just described himself and can't see
it.
"I know you are but what am I?"
To him loyalty and patriotism is "extreme militaristic nationalism".
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
Samuel Johnson
"Contempt for electoral democracy" - he's a Michael Moore fan.
You're stupid bigotry isn't evidence of anything but your own
extremism.
"Political and cultural liberalism". He thinks eugenics is a matter of
inevitable tradition.
Now you're lying outright. It's what you political bigots do when you
cannot justify your own extremism.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
He doesn't even know what a facist is. It's just a word that he read
somewhere.
Although fascist parties and movements differed significantly from
each other, they had many characteristics in common, including
extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy
and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social
hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a
Volksgemeinschaft (German: "people's community"), in which
individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the
nation.
Brittanica
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
16 Aug 2006 07:21:39 AM |
|
|
You seem to have "forgotten" to respond to the following. Not worthy
your time, eh? Translation: he has no reponse.
"A belief in natural social hierarchy". I guess this means he believes
in an unnatural social hierarchy. Now what could that be? Perhaps no
hierearchy at all. Everyone is the same. Sound familiar to anyone?
To this guy moral grounding constitutes elitism.
And finally, this guy believes that one person should have the same
influence as many. The common good is a totally foreign concept to
him.
You know, the more I listen to the guy, the more I agree that he's no
socialist. He's a communist. Read Marx and compare it to what he
says. Scarey.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
The irony is striking, folks. He just described himself and can't see
it.
"I know you are but what am I?"
To him loyalty and patriotism is "extreme militaristic nationalism".
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
Samuel Johnson
"Contempt for electoral democracy" - he's a Michael Moore fan.
You're stupid bigotry isn't evidence of anything but your own
extremism.
"Political and cultural liberalism". He thinks eugenics is a matter of
inevitable tradition.
Now you're lying outright. It's what you political bigots do when you
cannot justify your own extremism.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
He doesn't even know what a facist is. It's just a word that he read
somewhere.
Although fascist parties and movements differed significantly from
each other, they had many characteristics in common, including
extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy
and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social
hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a
Volksgemeinschaft (German: "people's community"), in which
individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the
nation.
Brittanica
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
11 Aug 2006 08:00:49 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
He doesn't even know what a facist is. It's just a word that he read
somewhere.
And you, sir, are a socialist. What would one expect from someone who
cries for redistribution of wealth so he can sit on his fat ***** and let
other people support him.
He supports himself, and chances are he is wealthier than you could
ever hope to be, not that it matters.
Jealous?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 01:45:09 PM |
|
|
Well, wasn't Air America stupid for teaming with someone bent on their
destruction!!! You folks never were too bright.
jtem01@gmail.com wrote:
ritpg wrote:
Ah! Still playing the old game of deleting the material
for which you have no response.
Wait. You're insane. Aren't you? I can tell...
I pointed out what the right-wing owned & protected
Clear Channel has done.
Fact is, the cronies who run Clear Channel have placed
profits -- "Shareholder Value" -- BEHIND partisan
politics.
Clear Channel did have a hand in pushing Air America off
their station in New York. Clear Channel has scooped up
the rights to Air America in numerous other markets, and
then limited their own revenues by putting them on weak
stations. Clear Channel does replace Air America's aftenoon
"Drive Time" programming with a fake liberal -- Ed Schultz.
You can argue that it doesn't make sense if you want, but
that doesn't change the fact that it is something they are
doing.
Clear Channel REQUIRES a shareholder lawsuit. The
management at Clear Channel has defrauded their
investors. They are wasting money AND kissing revenues
good bye, all in persuit of a partisan political agenda.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 08:46:56 AM |
|
|
And oh by the way, they lost their station because their ratings sucked
because you and your cohorts didn't support them.
jtem01@gmail.com wrote:
ritpg wrote:
If Air America had something of value to offer,
....then, by definition, they have something the
right-wing would want to deny to the people.
Hence: Right-wing owned & operated Clear Channel
got Air America thrown off a good station in NYC,
even as they secured the rights to Air America in
many other markets, placed them on crappy stations
and replaced a lot of their programing.
For the highly desirable afternoon "Drive Time," for
example, Clear Channel replaces Air America with
a fake "Liberal" who is more likely to spend his
time beating on the Democrats than discussing
anything important.
I guess he figures that, as a life-long conservative
who disdains what he calls "Wacko Liberals," if
he doesn't beat up on any Democrats that fail to
uphold his high standards then nobody else on
AM radio will.... Ed Schultz sucks.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "WCJ" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
05 Aug 2006 12:56:37 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
What I was wrong about was the depths to which people like George Sorros
would reach into their pockets in a futile attempt to save this
inherently flawed attempt at countering Rush Limbaugh, Michael Reagan,
and all the other highly successful conservative radio talk show hosts.
Here's a positive spin--but only for those of us who are not brain-dead
automatons...in other words, NOT conservatives. We don't NEED anyone to
do our thinking for us! That's why it was a "flawed attempt" at
countering the drug-addicted buffoon and others of his ilk--there's
simply no niche to fill.
Now, YOU try to comprehend that...I dare you.
--
I'm pro-choice. And so is my mother.
www.cafepress.com/saproducts/802010
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
05 Aug 2006 07:23:19 PM |
|
|
So Air America is failing because you wacko liberals don't need talk
radio. Yeh, right. Maybe someone should have told all the liberal
losers who staked their careers on Air America.
WCJ wrote:
ritpg wrote:
What I was wrong about was the depths to which people like George Sorros
would reach into their pockets in a futile attempt to save this
inherently flawed attempt at countering Rush Limbaugh, Michael Reagan,
and all the other highly successful conservative radio talk show hosts.
Here's a positive spin--but only for those of us who are not brain-dead
automatons...in other words, NOT conservatives. We don't NEED anyone to
do our thinking for us! That's why it was a "flawed attempt" at
countering the drug-addicted buffoon and others of his ilk--there's
simply no niche to fill.
Now, YOU try to comprehend that...I dare you.
--
I'm pro-choice. And so is my mother.
www.cafepress.com/saproducts/802010
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
06 Aug 2006 01:20:06 AM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
So Air America is failing because you wacko liberals don't need talk
radio.
No, it's "failing" because you're insane and don't live in the real
world.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
07 Aug 2006 07:26:12 AM |
|
|
Well there's a concession. At least he admits it's failing. Now if
only he can understand why. And I had nothing to to with it.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
So Air America is failing because you wacko liberals don't need talk
radio.
No, it's "failing" because you're insane and don't live in the real
world.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
08 Aug 2006 01:10:52 AM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
So Air America is failing because you wacko liberals don't need talk
radio.
No, it's "failing" because you're insane and don't live in the real
world.
Well there's a concession. At least he admits it's failing.
You're an illiterate bigot. I admitted nothing of the sort.
Now if
only he can understand why.
Easy. You're a liar. A right-wing goose-stepping bigot as well.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
10 Aug 2006 10:50:57 AM |
|
|
I'm a liar? All one has to do is go into Google Groups and click on
the View Profile link in one of your thousands of posts and you get the
following record of your posts for 2006:
Jan: 1735 posts
Feb: 1103 posts
Mar: 1447 posts
Apr: 814 posts (he must have been sick this month)
May: 1267 posts
Jun: 611 posts (this is when he went on vacation using his dole
money)
Jul: 1123 posts
Aug: 363 posts (right on track for another thousand post month)
And notice how he dodged the question. He won't tell us how he supports
himself because he lives off the dole while he sits there day after day
spending public money posting his non-responsive drivel.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
So Air America is failing because you wacko liberals don't need talk
radio.
No, it's "failing" because you're insane and don't live in the real
world.
Well there's a concession. At least he admits it's failing.
You're an illiterate bigot. I admitted nothing of the sort.
Now if
only he can understand why.
Easy. You're a liar. A right-wing goose-stepping bigot as well.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
14 Aug 2006 10:55:10 PM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm a liar?
Yes.
All one has to do is go into Google Groups and click on
the View Profile link in one of your thousands of posts and you get the
following record of your posts for 2006:
And what does that prove, liar?
[...]
And notice how he dodged the question. He won't tell us how he supports
himself
I'm a well-paid software engineer.
because he lives off the dole
There's another one of your lies. Another lie that you use to make
yourself feel better about being such a loser.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
15 Aug 2006 07:40:30 AM |
|
|
Interesting claim and yet I don't see a single post to a technical news
group under the name Ray Fischer.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm a liar?
Yes.
All one has to do is go into Google Groups and click on
the View Profile link in one of your thousands of posts and you get the
following record of your posts for 2006:
And what does that prove, liar?
[...]
And notice how he dodged the question. He won't tell us how he supports
himself
I'm a well-paid software engineer.
because he lives off the dole
There's another one of your lies. Another lie that you use to make
yourself feel better about being such a loser.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
16 Aug 2006 01:52:42 AM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm a liar?
Yes.
All one has to do is go into Google Groups and click on
the View Profile link in one of your thousands of posts and you get the
following record of your posts for 2006:
And what does that prove, liar?
[...]
And notice how he dodged the question. He won't tell us how he supports
himself
I'm a well-paid software engineer.
because he lives off the dole
There's another one of your lies. Another lie that you use to make
yourself feel better about being such a loser.
Interesting claim and yet I don't see a single post to a technical news
group under the name Ray Fischer.
That's because the "technical" news groups are filled with students
looking for help with their homework.
And you're still a liar.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
16 Aug 2006 07:39:57 AM |
|
|
Actually, the technical news groups involve people with a wide range of
interests and experience. There are students and there are
professionals. I know there are posts from people who work for
companies like Lockheed-Martin, Northrup Grumman and General Dynamics
all the time. Technology is a moving target and there are always the
early adapters who are willing to take chances and are willing to share
their experiences. You remind me of an IT person who works for me who
once said he didn't need to consult technical news groups because they
had nothing to offer him - he already knew it all. Needless to say,
that person has learned that he was wrong. I can think of many reasons
you don't participate. One, you have nothing to offer and don't want
anyone to know it. Two, you just don't want to share your information
because of your insecurity. Three, you're an elitist snob who thinks
everyone who participates in technical news groups is s student looking
for help with his homework. Four, after posting more that a thousand
articles to alt.abortion and other news groups dealing with social
issues, you have no time to be involved with technical news groups.
I've got an idea. Why don't you pick a couple of technical news groups
and post an article telling them what you think of them. It would be
the honest thing to do.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm a liar?
Yes.
All one has to do is go into Google Groups and click on
the View Profile link in one of your thousands of posts and you get the
following record of your posts for 2006:
And what does that prove, liar?
[...]
And notice how he dodged the question. He won't tell us how he supports
himself
I'm a well-paid software engineer.
because he lives off the dole
There's another one of your lies. Another lie that you use to make
yourself feel better about being such a loser.
Interesting claim and yet I don't see a single post to a technical news
group under the name Ray Fischer.
That's because the "technical" news groups are filled with students
looking for help with their homework.
And you're still a liar.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
18 Aug 2006 12:20:27 AM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm a liar?
Yes.
All one has to do is go into Google Groups and click on
the View Profile link in one of your thousands of posts and you get the
following record of your posts for 2006:
And what does that prove, liar?
[...]
And notice how he dodged the question. He won't tell us how he supports
himself
I'm a well-paid software engineer.
because he lives off the dole
There's another one of your lies. Another lie that you use to make
yourself feel better about being such a loser.
Interesting claim and yet I don't see a single post to a technical news
group under the name Ray Fischer.
That's because the "technical" news groups are filled with students
looking for help with their homework.
And you're still a liar.
Actually, the technical news groups involve people with a wide range of
interests and experience.
In your uneducated opinion.
Some people like helping newbies. I don't have the interest.
[...]
I can think of many reasons
you don't participate.
I'm not interested. That's the only reason that counts.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
22 Aug 2006 08:55:13 AM |
|
|
Ask me if I'm surprised that you aren't interested in helping
"newbies". I bet you aren't interested in helping anyone. You just
want to sit back with your blinders on criticizing what you can't
understand - just like the rest of the left wing liberals. Isn't it
ironic how you liberals feel you're smart enough to create the perfect
world but are not willing to go out of your way to help achieve that
perfect world. You are a microcosm (a very small microcosm) of left
wing liberal philosophy.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm a liar?
Yes.
All one has to do is go into Google Groups and click on
the View Profile link in one of your thousands of posts and you get the
following record of your posts for 2006:
And what does that prove, liar?
[...]
And notice how he dodged the question. He won't tell us how he supports
himself
I'm a well-paid software engineer.
because he lives off the dole
There's another one of your lies. Another lie that you use to make
yourself feel better about being such a loser.
Interesting claim and yet I don't see a single post to a technical news
group under the name Ray Fischer.
That's because the "technical" news groups are filled with students
looking for help with their homework.
And you're still a liar.
Actually, the technical news groups involve people with a wide range of
interests and experience.
In your uneducated opinion.
Some people like helping newbies. I don't have the interest.
[...]
I can think of many reasons
you don't participate.
I'm not interested. That's the only reason that counts.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
22 Aug 2006 09:44:43 PM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ask me if I'm surprised that you aren't interested in helping
"newbies".
Neither are you.
You just
want to sit back with your blinders on criticizing what you can't
Lying about me doesn't prove your argument. It only shows that you
are corrupted by your hate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
23 Aug 2006 07:52:22 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ask me if I'm surprised that you aren't interested in helping
"newbies".
Neither are you.
You just
want to sit back with your blinders on criticizing what you can't
Lying about me doesn't prove your argument. It only shows that you
are corrupted by your hate.
I simply expressed an opinion. I'm entitled to my opinion and if I
want to express that opinion, I will do so. Get used to it. My
opinion is that you spend hours every day of you wretched life whining
on Usenet never getting off you fat ***** to help anyone.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
23 Aug 2006 12:29:30 PM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ask me if I'm surprised that you aren't interested in helping
"newbies".
Neither are you.
You just
want to sit back with your blinders on criticizing what you can't
Lying about me doesn't prove your argument. It only shows that you
are corrupted by your hate.
I simply expressed an opinion.
By lying.
I'm entitled to my opinion
You're entitled to lie and I'm entitled to call you a liar when you
do so.
Quit whining, pro-liar hypocrite.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
23 Aug 2006 08:34:53 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ask me if I'm surprised that you aren't interested in helping
"newbies".
Neither are you.
You just
want to sit back with your blinders on criticizing what you can't
Lying about me doesn't prove your argument. It only shows that you
are corrupted by your hate.
I simply expressed an opinion. I'm entitled to my opinion and if I
want to express that opinion, I will do so.
We are entitled to the same.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
22 Aug 2006 11:18:33 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
Ask me if I'm surprised that you aren't interested in helping
"newbies". I bet you aren't interested in helping anyone. You just
want to sit back with your blinders on criticizing what you can't
understand - just like the rest of the left wing liberals. Isn't it
ironic how you liberals feel you're smart enough to create the perfect
world but are not willing to go out of your way to help achieve that
perfect world.
There isn't a perfect world, Mr. TPG. But we're people (whom you've
wrongly labeled, in some cases) who're perfectly fine in letting other
people make their own legal, moral choices, without the hassle of
sticking our respective noses where they don't belong.You might feel
the burden is on you to make sure everybody is in check, and granted
allowing people to run their own lives is pretty much hassle-free, but
don't confuse your charitable endeavors as helpful, to anybody, except
to bolster your self-serving purposes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
22 Aug 2006 03:15:57 PM |
|
|
The big difference then between you and me is where we draw the line.
You are a moral relativist who thinks those in control should decide
whatis morally correct. I believe in absolute right and wrong, never
changing, always the same.
And I know some special needs kids who would quite adamantly disagree
with you on the value of my "charitable endeavors". I guess I've got
to ask. Why do you think you exist?
Anamika wrote:
ritpg wrote:
Ask me if I'm surprised that you aren't interested in helping
"newbies". I bet you aren't interested in helping anyone. You just
want to sit back with your blinders on criticizing what you can't
understand - just like the rest of the left wing liberals. Isn't it
ironic how you liberals feel you're smart enough to create the perfect
world but are not willing to go out of your way to help achieve that
perfect world.
There isn't a perfect world, Mr. TPG. But we're people (whom you've
wrongly labeled, in some cases) who're perfectly fine in letting other
people make their own legal, moral choices, without the hassle of
sticking our respective noses where they don't belong.You might feel
the burden is on you to make sure everybody is in check, and granted
allowing people to run their own lives is pretty much hassle-free, but
don't confuse your charitable endeavors as helpful, to anybody, except
to bolster your self-serving purposes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
22 Aug 2006 05:47:52 PM |
|
|
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The big difference then between you and me is where we draw the line.
Indeed. You draw the line around yourself and then berate the rest of us for
not being like you.
You are a moral relativist who thinks those in control should decide
whatis morally correct. I believe in absolute right and wrong, never
changing, always the same.
So did Adolf Schicklgruber, and Iosif Dzhugashvili, Mao, Temujin...and your
point is?
And I know some special needs kids who would quite adamantly disagree
with you on the value of my "charitable endeavors". I guess I've got
to ask. Why do you think you exist?
Why do you ignore your own supposed morality? Being humble hasn't occurred to
you yet, at least in Usenet.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
28 Aug 2006 01:28:46 PM |
|
|
See embedded comment below.
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The big difference then between you and me is where we draw the line.
Indeed. You draw the line around yourself and then berate the rest of us for
not being like you.
You are a moral relativist who thinks those in control should decide
whatis morally correct. I believe in absolute right and wrong, never
changing, always the same.
So did Adolf Schicklgruber, and Iosif Dzhugashvili, Mao, Temujin...and your
point is?
And I know some special needs kids who would quite adamantly disagree
with you on the value of my "charitable endeavors". I guess I've got
to ask. Why do you think you exist?
Why do you ignore your own supposed morality? Being humble hasn't occurred to
you yet, at least in Usenet.
Great question and I'm very glad you asked it. I think it's important
for people like you and especially anyone considering abortion to be
aware of the volunteer work that people do to eliminate the need for
abortion. It's very easy for people like you to say how hopeless life
can be to the extent that abortion is the only answer. It's been said
that God doesn't give us anything we aren't equipped to handle. Of
course this is where people like you like to pull our all the
horrendous things that go on in the world done by people who had no
hope. Well, I believe that God doesn't give us anything we, together
as a group can't handle. He doesn't expect us to survive on our own.
He expects us to do volunteer work, whatever it takes to prevent
attrocities like abortion. Of course people like you would prefer that
one one know what good, caring people do. You would prefer that people
live in hopeless ignorance choosing abortion over finding out what the
alternatives are.
Got any more good questions?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
28 Aug 2006 06:22:24 PM |
|
|
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
See embedded comment below.
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The big difference then between you and me is where we draw the line.
Indeed. You draw the line around yourself and then berate the rest of us
for not being like you.
You are a moral relativist who thinks those in control should decide
whatis morally correct. I believe in absolute right and wrong, never
changing, always the same.
So did Adolf Schicklgruber, and Iosif Dzhugashvili, Mao, Temujin...and your
point is?
And I know some special needs kids who would quite adamantly disagree
with you on the value of my "charitable endeavors". I guess I've got
to ask. Why do you think you exist?
Why do you ignore your own supposed morality? Being humble hasn't occurred to
you yet, at least in Usenet.
Great question and I'm very glad you asked it. I think it's important
for people like you and especially anyone considering abortion to be
aware of the volunteer work that people do to eliminate the need for
abortion. It's very easy for people like you to say how hopeless life
can be to the extent that abortion is the only answer.
You just ran off the end of the bridge, son...and you obviously can't be
bothered to notice what I *have* said over the years. I have never claimed
that abortion is the only answer. It is an answer, but the pregnant woman has
the right to make her (preferably informed as possible) choice as to how that
pregnancy should be handled. It's her choice I help defend, regardless of
what it is.
It's been said
that God doesn't give us anything we aren't equipped to handle. Of
course this is where people like you like to pull our all the
horrendous things that go on in the world done by people who had no
hope. Well, I believe that God doesn't give us anything we, together
as a group can't handle. He doesn't expect us to survive on our own.
He expects us to do volunteer work, whatever it takes to prevent
attrocities like abortion. Of course people like you would prefer that
one one know what good, caring people do. You would prefer that people
live in hopeless ignorance choosing abortion over finding out what the
alternatives are.
You're one arrogant crackhead, Terry. You can't even parse my opinions within
the same universe as a correct translation, and then you wonder why I don't
respect your tactics? Now you know why I said you need an egoectomy.
Got any more good questions?
Yeah...when is some woman going to rearrange your face after you refuse to
mind your own business?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
29 Aug 2006 10:19:04 AM |
|
|
See comment below:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
See embedded comment below.
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The big difference then between you and me is where we draw the line.
Indeed. You draw the line around yourself and then berate the rest of us
for not being like you.
You are a moral relativist who thinks those in control should decide
whatis morally correct. I believe in absolute right and wrong, never
changing, always the same.
So did Adolf Schicklgruber, and Iosif Dzhugashvili, Mao, Temujin...and your
point is?
And I know some special needs kids who would quite adamantly disagree
with you on the value of my "charitable endeavors". I guess I've got
to ask. Why do you think you exist?
Why do you ignore your own supposed morality? Being humble hasn't occurred to
you yet, at least in Usenet.
Great question and I'm very glad you asked it. I think it's important
for people like you and especially anyone considering abortion to be
aware of the volunteer work that people do to eliminate the need for
abortion. It's very easy for people like you to say how hopeless life
can be to the extent that abortion is the only answer.
You just ran off the end of the bridge, son...and you obviously can't be
bothered to notice what I *have* said over the years. I have never claimed
that abortion is the only answer. It is an answer, but the pregnant woman has
the right to make her (preferably informed as possible) choice as to how that
pregnancy should be handled. It's her choice I help defend, regardless of
what it is.
It's been said
that God doesn't give us anything we aren't equipped to handle. Of
course this is where people like you like to pull our all the
horrendous things that go on in the world done by people who had no
hope. Well, I believe that God doesn't give us anything we, together
as a group can't handle. He doesn't expect us to survive on our own.
He expects us to do volunteer work, whatever it takes to prevent
attrocities like abortion. Of course people like you would prefer that
one one know what good, caring people do. You would prefer that people
live in hopeless ignorance choosing abortion over finding out what the
alternatives are.
You're one arrogant crackhead, Terry. You can't even parse my opinions within
the same universe as a correct translation, and then you wonder why I don't
respect your tactics? Now you know why I said you need an egoectomy.
Got any more good questions?
Yeah...when is some woman going to rearrange your face after you refuse to
mind your own business?
I would expect such behavior from the women you hang with. On my side
of the fence, women respect my efforts and are right along side me.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
