| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"ritpg" |
| Date: |
03 Aug 2006 08:56:01 AM |
| Object: |
Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
I predicted the failure of Air America when it was announced. At the
time I said that liberals aren't interested in or capable of discussing
facts and that because there are only so many ways to say "because I
say so" this bastion of left wing thought, would never last. Well I
must admit it's lasted longer than I expected. Is that because I was
wrong about the reasons the network would fail. Absolutely not. What
I was wrong about was the depths to which people like George Sorros
would reach into their pockets in a futile attempt to save this
inherently flawed attempt at countering Rush Limbaugh, Michael Reagan,
and all the other highly successful conservative radio talk show hosts.
As a confirmed conservative myself, I've got to say this scenario has
turned out to be better than I had hoped. Not only is Air America
experience a most painful - and deserved - death, it's bankrupting
people like Sorros. It just doesn't get any better than that.
New Your Post, Aug. 3, 2006
THE liberal Air America radio network is going to be harder to hear in
New York.
Next month, it is switching stations - to a weaker AM station, WWRL
(1600 AM).
Al Franken and his lefty colleagues are leaving WLIB (1190 AM)
apparently because they couldn't come up with enough cash for the
owners, former Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton and his son,
Pierre.
Starting Sept. 1, Air America will be on WWRL, at the top of the dial
where AM signals are weakest - especially at night, when greater FCC
restrictions apply.
As The Post reported last March, the ratings-challenged liberal network
failed to renew its two-year lease with the Suttons.
Relations between the Suttons and the network's execs were rocky from
the start and only got worse after the network's shaky finances became
known and a scandal broke out involving loans to Air America from a
Bronx charity.
WLIB's future after Sept. 1 is not known, although radio industry
heavyweight Randy Michaels - the builder of 1,200-station Clear Channel
- has expressed interest in leasing the station as a base for a new
talk-radio network.
Michaels declined comment yesterday and the Suttons didn't return calls.
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 12:31:52 AM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I predicted the failure of Air America when it was announced.
And you relied upon your bigotry instead of your brains and were
proven wrong.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 08:49:16 AM |
|
|
Still deleting what you can't respond to, I see. The only thing I was
wrong about was the amount of sunk cost that would come out of the
pockets of people like George Sorros. The venture was a loser from day
one. Speaking of losers.....
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I predicted the failure of Air America when it was announced.
And you relied upon your bigotry instead of your brains and were
proven wrong.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 10:26:46 PM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Still deleting what you can't respond to, I see.
Still lying about things you don't like, I see.
The only thing I was
wrong about was the amount of sunk cost that would come out of the
pockets of people like George Sorros.
You're insane.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
05 Aug 2006 07:20:09 PM |
|
|
You post more than one thousand articles a month and you call me
insane??? Get some help. And get a life. I'd love to know who
supports you.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Still deleting what you can't respond to, I see.
Still lying about things you don't like, I see.
The only thing I was
wrong about was the amount of sunk cost that would come out of the
pockets of people like George Sorros.
You're insane.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
06 Aug 2006 01:19:29 AM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
You post more than one thousand articles a month and you call me
insane???
Yes. You are insane. You make a claim that was COMPLETE CRAP and
now you're trying to spin it and make excuses.
That makes you nuts.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
07 Aug 2006 07:28:35 AM |
|
|
So tell us, Ray. How do you write over a thousand posts a month and
still support yourself? I'm betting you're on the dole. My dole.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
You post more than one thousand articles a month and you call me
insane???
Yes. You are insane. You make a claim that was COMPLETE CRAP and
now you're trying to spin it and make excuses.
That makes you nuts.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
08 Aug 2006 01:09:47 AM |
|
|
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
You post more than one thousand articles a month and you call me
insane???
Yes. You are insane. You make a claim that was COMPLETE CRAP and
now you're trying to spin it and make excuses.
That makes you nuts.
So tell us, Ray. How do you write over a thousand posts a month and
You lied. Now you're resorting to personal attacks.
Business as usual.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
07 Aug 2006 08:22:30 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
So tell us, Ray. How do you write over a thousand posts a month and
still support yourself? I'm betting you're on the dole. My dole.
So where's those readily-available photos, Terry?
Still no link.
Ray Fischer wrote:
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:
You post more than one thousand articles a month and you call me
insane???
Yes. You are insane. You make a claim that was COMPLETE CRAP and
now you're trying to spin it and make excuses.
That makes you nuts.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and people searches:
1130571778.956274.188530@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
DOING ANY SEARCHES AT ALL would give you more detail than you needed to
know.
1130665660_3361@spool6-east.superfeed.net
She doesn't know my situation because she doesn't feel the need to go
looking into other people's business like you do.
1414fd53.0203122023.23a36970@posting.google.com
FYI, all a.a. readers who are familiar with Craig Chilton:
Craig has claimed no fewer than six times that he is an elected
official of the Iowa Republican party. To be specific, he says that
he has been *RE*-elected the State Central Committee:
BUT: I did some homework by speaking directly to members of the Iowa
Republican party, specifically, Marlys Popma, Darrell Kearney, Joel
Hannahs, Chad Barth, and Carolyn McGoldrick. I received responses
from some of them, and they did not recognize the name Craig Chilton.
Mr. Kearney flat out said Craig was not a member of the central
committee whatsoever.
Okay, so maybe they aren't entirely informed. But, what about the
website? Wouldn't the Local Party Officials directory for Black Hawk
county have Craig's name there?
http://www.iowagop.org/directory.asp
Hm, no Craig.
Let's try somewhere else:
http://www.elect...@co.black-hawk.ia.us/ ?
Nope.
A Google search of Iowa Republicans, Black Hawk County Republicans,
and the like produced nothing. Black Hawk County Republicans site
seemed to be having server trouble, and if anything develops with it I
will post it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
11 Aug 2006 08:14:47 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
So tell us, Ray. How do you write over a thousand posts a month and
still support yourself? I'm betting you're on the dole. My dole.
You don't make enough, top-poster.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
03 Aug 2006 09:55:54 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
I predicted the failure of Air America when it was announced.
And you said it was going out of business two years ago, IIRC.
Got those pictures of a woman dead in childbirth off the Internet yet,
Terry? It's been three years and I'm still waiting....
<snip>
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on her mystery down payment:
1414fd53.0312122347.79901...@posting.google.com
By April of 2001, the money I had managed to save for a down payment on a
house (from my husband and I working three jobs between us) was
confiscated by the IRS.
The first year of the Bush presidency, I got money back and am now a
homeowner.
1129172027.067956.70...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
I never paid a down payment on my house. The government took it
all. Fortunately, my husband is a Navy veteran, we had good credit,
and he was able to use his military benefits to get a $0 down.
1130579291.315993.196310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
We did have a down.
1130263251.632250.146780@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Any amount is more than the zero I put in, you stupid crackhead.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
03 Aug 2006 10:17:02 AM |
|
|
--sexkitten-- <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> writes:
ritpg wrote:
I predicted the failure of Air America when it was announced.
And you said it was going out of business two years ago, IIRC.
Got those pictures of a woman dead in childbirth off the Internet yet, Terry?
It's been three years and I'm still waiting....
<snip>
Evidently, he was at that nightclub fire in Connecticut (IIRC) a couple of
years ago and inhaled a bit too much of the smoke...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
03 Aug 2006 07:48:30 PM |
|
|
Sure and I've got pictures of people dead in car crashes too. But that
doesn't mean we should stop driving. Nor should women stop having
babies by killing them first.
--sexkitten-- wrote:
ritpg wrote:
I predicted the failure of Air America when it was announced.
And you said it was going out of business two years ago, IIRC.
Got those pictures of a woman dead in childbirth off the Internet yet,
Terry? It's been three years and I'm still waiting....
<snip>
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on her mystery down payment:
1414fd53.0312122347.79901...@posting.google.com
By April of 2001, the money I had managed to save for a down payment on a
house (from my husband and I working three jobs between us) was
confiscated by the IRS.
The first year of the Bush presidency, I got money back and am now a
homeowner.
1129172027.067956.70...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
I never paid a down payment on my house. The government took it
all. Fortunately, my husband is a Navy veteran, we had good credit,
and he was able to use his military benefits to get a $0 down.
1130579291.315993.196310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
We did have a down.
1130263251.632250.146780@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Any amount is more than the zero I put in, you stupid crackhead.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 03:54:34 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
Sure
Post 'em.
and I've got pictures of people dead in car crashes too. But that
doesn't mean we should stop driving.
It doesn't mean we should force people to drive, either.
Nor should women stop having
babies by killing them first.
So that also means that they shouldn't stop taking mifeprestone or
having abortions because it's occasionally fatal?
--sexkitten-- wrote:
ritpg wrote:
I predicted the failure of Air America when it was announced.
And you said it was going out of business two years ago, IIRC.
Got those pictures of a woman dead in childbirth off the Internet yet,
Terry? It's been three years and I'm still waiting....
<snip>
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on her mystery down payment:
1414fd53.0312122347.79901...@posting.google.com
By April of 2001, the money I had managed to save for a down payment on a
house (from my husband and I working three jobs between us) was
confiscated by the IRS.
The first year of the Bush presidency, I got money back and am now a
homeowner.
1129172027.067956.70...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
I never paid a down payment on my house. The government took it
all. Fortunately, my husband is a Navy veteran, we had good credit,
and he was able to use his military benefits to get a $0 down.
1130579291.315993.196310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
We did have a down.
1130263251.632250.146780@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Any amount is more than the zero I put in, you stupid crackhead.
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and people searches:
1130571778.956274.188530@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
DOING ANY SEARCHES AT ALL would give you more detail than you needed to
know.
1130665660_3361@spool6-east.superfeed.net
She doesn't know my situation because she doesn't feel the need to go
looking into other people's business like you do.
1414fd53.0203122023.23a36970@posting.google.com
FYI, all a.a. readers who are familiar with Craig Chilton:
Craig has claimed no fewer than six times that he is an elected
official of the Iowa Republican party. To be specific, he says that
he has been *RE*-elected the State Central Committee:
BUT: I did some homework by speaking directly to members of the Iowa
Republican party, specifically, Marlys Popma, Darrell Kearney, Joel
Hannahs, Chad Barth, and Carolyn McGoldrick. I received responses
from some of them, and they did not recognize the name Craig Chilton.
Mr. Kearney flat out said Craig was not a member of the central
committee whatsoever.
Okay, so maybe they aren't entirely informed. But, what about the
website? Wouldn't the Local Party Officials directory for Black Hawk
county have Craig's name there?
http://www.iowagop.org/directory.asp
Hm, no Craig.
Let's try somewhere else:
http://www.elect...@co.black-hawk.ia.us/ ?
Nope.
A Google search of Iowa Republicans, Black Hawk County Republicans,
and the like produced nothing. Black Hawk County Republicans site
seemed to be having server trouble, and if anything develops with it I
will post it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
03 Aug 2006 04:08:26 PM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
WLIB's future after Sept. 1 is not known, although radio
industry heavyweight Randy Michaels - the builder of
1,200-station Clear Channel - has expressed interest in
leasing the station as a base for a new talk-radio network.
So Air America got pushed to a weaker station after the
right-wing owned & operated Clear Channel expressed
interest in the station they were operating on.
In Boston and several other major media markets, Clear
Channel managed to secure the rights to Air America
directly, and then place them on little stations with weak
signals... effectively keeping Air America out of the range
of millions of radios.
Seriously. You can drive up Mt. Auburn Street in Cambridge
(perhaps the single most "Liberal city in Massachusetts)
and NOT receive Air America at all... thanks to Clear
Channel... keeping channels "Clear" of Air America.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
03 Aug 2006 07:50:41 PM |
|
|
If Air America had something of value to offer, someone would pick them
up. Or are you saying that all the radio statiions in the US are owned
by conservatives?
jtem01@gmail.com wrote:
ritpg wrote:
WLIB's future after Sept. 1 is not known, although radio
industry heavyweight Randy Michaels - the builder of
1,200-station Clear Channel - has expressed interest in
leasing the station as a base for a new talk-radio network.
So Air America got pushed to a weaker station after the
right-wing owned & operated Clear Channel expressed
interest in the station they were operating on.
In Boston and several other major media markets, Clear
Channel managed to secure the rights to Air America
directly, and then place them on little stations with weak
signals... effectively keeping Air America out of the range
of millions of radios.
Seriously. You can drive up Mt. Auburn Street in Cambridge
(perhaps the single most "Liberal city in Massachusetts)
and NOT receive Air America at all... thanks to Clear
Channel... keeping channels "Clear" of Air America.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
03 Aug 2006 08:13:09 PM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
If Air America had something of value to offer,
....then, by definition, they have something the
right-wing would want to deny to the people.
Hence: Right-wing owned & operated Clear Channel
got Air America thrown off a good station in NYC,
even as they secured the rights to Air America in
many other markets, placed them on crappy stations
and replaced a lot of their programing.
For the highly desirable afternoon "Drive Time," for
example, Clear Channel replaces Air America with
a fake "Liberal" who is more likely to spend his
time beating on the Democrats than discussing
anything important.
I guess he figures that, as a life-long conservative
who disdains what he calls "Wacko Liberals," if
he doesn't beat up on any Democrats that fail to
uphold his high standards then nobody else on
AM radio will.... Ed Schultz sucks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 08:45:07 AM |
|
|
Ah! Still playing the old game of deleting the material for which you
have no response. Only a narcissistic woman like you could ever think
its appropriate to kill 4 thousand babies a day so 12 women can
eliminate pregnancy as a risk to their medical condition. Think about
it, folks. That's what this boils down to. Only 3 % of abortions are
performed to reduce the risk to a woman's life. The rest are all
choices about life style.
And it's all coming home to roost. Just look at Western Europe being
overtaken by immigrants who, oh by the way, don't believe in abortion.
It's been a self-resolving problem all along. She who kills her babies
has no one to continue her family line or her example. She who has her
babies leaves behind people to procreate and follow her example.
jtem01@gmail.com wrote:
ritpg wrote:
If Air America had something of value to offer,
....then, by definition, they have something the
right-wing would want to deny to the people.
Hence: Right-wing owned & operated Clear Channel
got Air America thrown off a good station in NYC,
even as they secured the rights to Air America in
many other markets, placed them on crappy stations
and replaced a lot of their programing.
For the highly desirable afternoon "Drive Time," for
example, Clear Channel replaces Air America with
a fake "Liberal" who is more likely to spend his
time beating on the Democrats than discussing
anything important.
I guess he figures that, as a life-long conservative
who disdains what he calls "Wacko Liberals," if
he doesn't beat up on any Democrats that fail to
uphold his high standards then nobody else on
AM radio will.... Ed Schultz sucks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 09:40:38 AM |
|
|
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
Ah! Still playing the old game of deleting the material for which you
have no response. Only a narcissistic woman like you could ever think
its appropriate to kill 4 thousand babies a day so 12 women can
eliminate pregnancy as a risk to their medical condition. Think about
it, folks. That's what this boils down to. Only 3 % of abortions are
performed to reduce the risk to a woman's life. The rest are all
choices about life style.
And it's all coming home to roost. Just look at Western Europe being
overtaken by immigrants who, oh by the way, don't believe in abortion.
It's been a self-resolving problem all along. She who kills her babies
has no one to continue her family line or her example. She who has her
babies leaves behind people to procreate and follow her example.
Really, Rhode Island Red? Let's see - my wife has been pro-choice about as
long as I have, which didn't stop her from having a daughter back in the
mid-1970s...said daughter is also pro-choice, and she's been pregnant three
times, and we have three grandchildren as a result, the youngest of which was
born Monday of last week. Your theory is slightly broken.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 01:42:58 PM |
|
|
It's all about statistics. The fact that you can point to an exception
is of no significance to me. You people, by definition, are a dying
breed. And isn't that the way your Darwinian theory said it's supposed
to work. Survival of the fitest? The fitest procreate. The weak ones
don't.
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
Ah! Still playing the old game of deleting the material for which you
have no response. Only a narcissistic woman like you could ever think
its appropriate to kill 4 thousand babies a day so 12 women can
eliminate pregnancy as a risk to their medical condition. Think about
it, folks. That's what this boils down to. Only 3 % of abortions are
performed to reduce the risk to a woman's life. The rest are all
choices about life style.
And it's all coming home to roost. Just look at Western Europe being
overtaken by immigrants who, oh by the way, don't believe in abortion.
It's been a self-resolving problem all along. She who kills her babies
has no one to continue her family line or her example. She who has her
babies leaves behind people to procreate and follow her example.
Really, Rhode Island Red? Let's see - my wife has been pro-choice about as
long as I have, which didn't stop her from having a daughter back in the
mid-1970s...said daughter is also pro-choice, and she's been pregnant three
times, and we have three grandchildren as a result, the youngest of which was
born Monday of last week. Your theory is slightly broken.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
04 Aug 2006 05:54:11 PM |
|
|
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
Ah! Still playing the old game of deleting the material for which you
have no response. Only a narcissistic woman like you could ever think
its appropriate to kill 4 thousand babies a day so 12 women can
eliminate pregnancy as a risk to their medical condition. Think about
it, folks. That's what this boils down to. Only 3 % of abortions are
performed to reduce the risk to a woman's life. The rest are all
choices about life style.
And it's all coming home to roost. Just look at Western Europe being
overtaken by immigrants who, oh by the way, don't believe in abortion.
It's been a self-resolving problem all along. She who kills her babies
has no one to continue her family line or her example. She who has her
babies leaves behind people to procreate and follow her example.
Really, Rhode Island Red? Let's see - my wife has been pro-choice about as
long as I have, which didn't stop her from having a daughter back in the
mid-1970s...said daughter is also pro-choice, and she's been pregnant three
times, and we have three grandchildren as a result, the youngest of which was
born Monday of last week. Your theory is slightly broken.
It's all about statistics. The fact that you can point to an exception
is of no significance to me. You people, by definition, are a dying
breed. And isn't that the way your Darwinian theory said it's supposed
to work. Survival of the fitest? The fitest procreate. The weak ones
don't.
You're not talking to "you people", moron. You're talking to one pro-choicer
who knows far better than you ever will. Might as well enjoy your delusions
of respect, since you're a tiny man in a tiny state.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
05 Aug 2006 07:27:50 PM |
|
|
I'll take the response from someone who has nothing better to do than
post almost a thousand posts a month with a very large grain of salt.
So whose time are you stealing these days?
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
Ah! Still playing the old game of deleting the material for which you
have no response. Only a narcissistic woman like you could ever think
its appropriate to kill 4 thousand babies a day so 12 women can
eliminate pregnancy as a risk to their medical condition. Think about
it, folks. That's what this boils down to. Only 3 % of abortions are
performed to reduce the risk to a woman's life. The rest are all
choices about life style.
And it's all coming home to roost. Just look at Western Europe being
overtaken by immigrants who, oh by the way, don't believe in abortion.
It's been a self-resolving problem all along. She who kills her babies
has no one to continue her family line or her example. She who has her
babies leaves behind people to procreate and follow her example.
Really, Rhode Island Red? Let's see - my wife has been pro-choice about as
long as I have, which didn't stop her from having a daughter back in the
mid-1970s...said daughter is also pro-choice, and she's been pregnant three
times, and we have three grandchildren as a result, the youngest of which was
born Monday of last week. Your theory is slightly broken.
It's all about statistics. The fact that you can point to an exception
is of no significance to me. You people, by definition, are a dying
breed. And isn't that the way your Darwinian theory said it's supposed
to work. Survival of the fitest? The fitest procreate. The weak ones
don't.
You're not talking to "you people", moron. You're talking to one pro-choicer
who knows far better than you ever will. Might as well enjoy your delusions
of respect, since you're a tiny man in a tiny state.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
06 Aug 2006 12:00:10 AM |
|
|
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
Ah! Still playing the old game of deleting the material for which you
have no response. Only a narcissistic woman like you could ever think
its appropriate to kill 4 thousand babies a day so 12 women can
eliminate pregnancy as a risk to their medical condition. Think about
it, folks. That's what this boils down to. Only 3 % of abortions are
performed to reduce the risk to a woman's life. The rest are all
choices about life style.
And it's all coming home to roost. Just look at Western Europe being
overtaken by immigrants who, oh by the way, don't believe in abortion.
It's been a self-resolving problem all along. She who kills her babies
has no one to continue her family line or her example. She who has her
babies leaves behind people to procreate and follow her example.
Really, Rhode Island Red? Let's see - my wife has been pro-choice about
as long as I have, which didn't stop her from having a daughter back in
the mid-1970s...said daughter is also pro-choice, and she's been
pregnant three times, and we have three grandchildren as a result, the
youngest of which was born Monday of last week. Your theory is slightly
broken.
It's all about statistics. The fact that you can point to an exception is
of no significance to me. You people, by definition, are a dying breed.
And isn't that the way your Darwinian theory said it's supposed to work.
Survival of the fitest? The fitest procreate. The weak ones don't.
You're not talking to "you people", moron. You're talking to one
pro-choicer who knows far better than you ever will. Might as well enjoy
your delusions of respect, since you're a tiny man in a tiny state.
I'll take the response from someone who has nothing better to do than
post almost a thousand posts a month with a very large grain of salt.
So whose time are you stealing these days?
Do your own detective work...and obviously, I'm stealing the time you take to
whine at me.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
07 Aug 2006 07:29:55 AM |
|
|
That's not what Rice U. thought, now is it?
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
Ah! Still playing the old game of deleting the material for which you
have no response. Only a narcissistic woman like you could ever think
its appropriate to kill 4 thousand babies a day so 12 women can
eliminate pregnancy as a risk to their medical condition. Think about
it, folks. That's what this boils down to. Only 3 % of abortions are
performed to reduce the risk to a woman's life. The rest are all
choices about life style.
And it's all coming home to roost. Just look at Western Europe being
overtaken by immigrants who, oh by the way, don't believe in abortion.
It's been a self-resolving problem all along. She who kills her babies
has no one to continue her family line or her example. She who has her
babies leaves behind people to procreate and follow her example.
Really, Rhode Island Red? Let's see - my wife has been pro-choice about
as long as I have, which didn't stop her from having a daughter back in
the mid-1970s...said daughter is also pro-choice, and she's been
pregnant three times, and we have three grandchildren as a result, the
youngest of which was born Monday of last week. Your theory is slightly
broken.
It's all about statistics. The fact that you can point to an exception is
of no significance to me. You people, by definition, are a dying breed.
And isn't that the way your Darwinian theory said it's supposed to work.
Survival of the fitest? The fitest procreate. The weak ones don't.
You're not talking to "you people", moron. You're talking to one
pro-choicer who knows far better than you ever will. Might as well enjoy
your delusions of respect, since you're a tiny man in a tiny state.
I'll take the response from someone who has nothing better to do than
post almost a thousand posts a month with a very large grain of salt.
So whose time are you stealing these days?
Do your own detective work...and obviously, I'm stealing the time you take to
whine at me.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
07 Aug 2006 11:12:02 AM |
|
|
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
That's not what Rice U. thought, now is it?
So, what's your latest fantasy? (Remember, the University and I know...and
you're not a party to that.) Dance a little more, Rhode Island Banty Capon.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
11 Aug 2006 08:13:55 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
That's not what Rice U. thought, now is it?
How would you know, Mr. TPG?
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
11 Aug 2006 11:32:45 AM |
|
|
I love it when they try to threaten you by indicating they know who you
are.
Go for it, loser!
Anamika wrote:
ritpg wrote:
That's not what Rice U. thought, now is it?
How would you know, Mr. TPG?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
11 Aug 2006 11:50:44 PM |
|
|
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
Anamika wrote:
ritpg wrote:
That's not what Rice U. thought, now is it?
How would you know, Mr. TPG?
I love it when they try to threaten you by indicating they know who you
are.
Well, it's not exactly a secret, considering it's posted as your user name.
It's just a coincidence your county-sized state is also included, right?
Go for it, loser!
For all you know, she could be a neighbor to you...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
11 Aug 2006 11:40:46 AM |
|
|
ritpg wrote:
Anamika wrote:
ritpg wrote:
That's not what Rice U. thought, now is it?
How would you know, Mr. TPG?
I love it when they try to threaten you by indicating they know who you
are.
Go for it, loser!
It's all in your name, silly.
Now will you reply to my query properly? No paranoid substitutes
allowed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ritpg" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
15 Aug 2006 07:54:23 AM |
|
|
To know how I know, you have to do some research. What happened is
pretty well documented in past postings. Ask him why he no longer
works at Rice.
Anamika wrote:
ritpg wrote:
Anamika wrote:
ritpg wrote:
That's not what Rice U. thought, now is it?
How would you know, Mr. TPG?
I love it when they try to threaten you by indicating they know who you
are.
Go for it, loser!
It's all in your name, silly.
Now will you reply to my query properly? No paranoid substitutes
allowed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Put a Positive Spin on This One - I Dare You |
15 Aug 2006 10:46:03 AM |
|
|
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> writes:
Anamika wrote:
ritpg wrote:
Anamika wrote:
ritpg wrote:
That's not what Rice U. thought, now is it?
How would you know, Mr. TPG?
I love it when they try to threaten you by indicating they know who you
are.
Go for it, loser!
It's all in your name, silly.
Now will you reply to my query properly? No paranoid substitutes
allowed.
To know how I know, you have to do some research. What happened is
pretty well documented in past postings. Ask him why he no longer
works at Rice.
She already knows why...and she knows better than you ever will. (What you
say is documented has very little to do with the why and when.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
