On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:48:23 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:25:09 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:18:28 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:26:35 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:36:34 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 05:52:34 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:29:57 -0400,

Strife767 wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:56:36 -0400,

Ray Fischer wrote:

J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

This is the homo community's opportunity to show the world how

they

too can

be patriotic to their homelands;

Unlike you unAmerican homophobes who would rather kill than

tolerate

dissent.

Says the poster who thinks that killing millions of

Aren't you a Holocaust denier/supporter?

No. are you?

So you agree that the Holocaust was a horrible event and you feel
compassion for the families of all the victims?

What fucking "holocaust"?

I'm not asking you, idiot. Can't you read?

You're posting to a public forum, *****.

And directly questioning one person's beliefs.

If you put it in a public forum, you're putting it up for debate.

Okay, so if I ask your age on Usenet, anyone else can answer for you?

LOL, explain to me how asking someone a direct question about his/her
particular beliefs is "putting it up for debate." What is there to debate?
It's a yes/no question asked by one person to one person. Moron.

You want to ask someone
directly, take it to email.

The answer had relevance to the public statement made, so it made sense
to
make the question public too. "Public forum," remember?

That's why I answered it.

So why are you whining that I should have used e-mail?

It was wartime, for *****'s sake.

lol, the Jews were not an enemy army--they were practically all
civilians
(and children and babies weren't spared either! What, do you argue
that
"they were a threat?" LOL). What a ridiculous shambles of an argument.

Civilians die in wartime.
Why should jews be exempt?

Civilians are not directly _targeted_ in wartime. Not by any normal
armed
forces, anyway.

*****. Look at Vietnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam. Look at Eye-rak.

Please cite any example of civilians being singled out on either occasion,
and treated as "the enemy" exclusively or specifically.

you
are just taking up space on the planet.

Mm, no, I'd say not--talked one person out of suicide, and freed
another
from the grip of Rev. Moon's cult. Not bad, considering I'm only 22
and
never worked as a counselor of any kind.

Only 22? You know jack *****, sunshine. Come back when you've grown
up.

Case in point--you can take personal stabs all day, but I routinely
expose
the idiocy of people more than twice my age whenever the urge strikes
me
on Usenet.

In your dreams, little *****.

Google is archiving yet another example of it as I type. :)

Again, in your dreams.

lol

Your immaturity is self-evident.

Oh, yes, I'M immature, not the guy who talks about the Holocaust as if
"the Jews had it coming." You ridiculous person, you.

I don't recall using that sentence.

I don't recall attributing it to you.

Do you know what a simile is? Or did
you cut that day of class, too?

Find it for me, will you?
You ridiculous little *****, you.

Childish sniveling noted.

Also, I'm obviously more articulate than you. How old are _you_,
hotshot?
:)

Obviously not.

How do you explain the fact that you can't seem to say _anything_
without
a whiny little personal attack laced in? lol, please.

How else should one deal with a prissy little *****?

Thanks for proving my point. :)

You can't even spell, for *****'s sake.

LOL, just can't let go of a minor typographical error, can you? Just
shows
how desperate you are to fuel your childish ranting.

Face up to your illiteracy and move on, sunshine.

And thanks again for proving this point as well. So pathetic, lol.

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thrbgslb5i5s70@chris...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:24:32 -0400, Benjie <benjie@y'allknowbynow.com.>
wrote:

"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:ld3jj2hhfoh9bb7jbl9hopg3vatpu41ndj@4ax.com...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:47:45 +0100, "Pinky & Perky sing Psalms"
<cantoringalong@ease.com> wrote:

The nazis also hated and killed homosexuals.<<

They also killed Christians - what has that to do with it?

The Nazis were also Christians. Christians often kill other
Christians. Thankfully other wise Christians would be the majority.

Homosexuality must be condemned, not because nazi's oppose it, but
because

Homophobia must be condemned not because Nazis and most other
Christians are filled with it, and it's evil. Much worse than racism,
at least you allow most to marry and enjoy the freedoms that other
people have.

God calls it an abomination.

Actually God doesn't give a *****, I asked him to tell me if
homosexuals were wrong or evil. Not a single word from him. He did
tell me that most bigots that are filled with hate, will never see
heaven.

Poofters should be fucked and burned, matey. Thank god they're a dying
race.

They're a dying race (they're a race?)? Strange how they've been around
for millenia--and you do realize that they _all_ come from you
"straights," right? Homosexuals usually don't reproduce--_you_ guys are
popping them out.

Nothing but your own wishful thinking--pathetic and hilarious all at once.
:)

Poofters should be fucked and burned, you *****.