Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again

Science > Abortion > Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 3 of 7

Topic:	Science > Abortion
User:	"Osprey"
Date:	29 Sep 2003 04:48:00 PM
Object:	Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again

"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0309291326.65c6574b@posting.google.com...

papajack@stic.net (Papa Jack) wrote...

September 28, 2003
South Carolina Abortion Numbers Decline Again
by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor

http://www.lifenews.com/state161.html

See what can happen when a state passes the very laws
which the abortion industry has spent millions of dollars
fighting in various courts?

Sure. Women who don't want to be yanked around by "right to know"
laws or waiting periods will simply go someplace else.

Fact is
Abortions are on the decline. This is good news.
Fact is
You and other pro-choice/aborts don't want that
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 08:17:40 AM

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:a4qqnvovcljbaohr4imch5lhi7q3g6pqto@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:32:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:g0tpnv8mgvna00c74mflunjuet92hdn6l4@4ax.com...

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 23:57:46 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:u0qpnv0c46h9gvore6qlgsosgsbmom8gvl@4ax.com...

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:50:40 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:u0kpnvoltr3u2km5tvh0c6efqko5nkob4o@4ax.com...

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 21:25:34 -0400, "Osprey"

<noneedstoknow@mail.com>

wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:vsipnvo07b7fq73cuqe5lt91lj746l28op@4ax.com...

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:49:12 -0400, "Osprey"

<noneedstoknow@mail.com>

wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:mg6pnvof29fbadp0q3hddf89u5d1v30hck@4ax.com...

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 17:21:30 -0400, "Osprey"

<noneedstoknow@mail.com>

wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:oj3pnvc865qt52ejmr4952tp8gh86pvhgj@4ax.com...

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 16:39:23 -0400, "Osprey"

<noneedstoknow@mail.com>

wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:ri1pnv004s9hcee4d095ks2vev7k123kij@4ax.com...

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 15:53:15 -0400, "Osprey"

<noneedstoknow@mail.com>

wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:mvqonv0trfh6phad0nn8escbmiftigbs6b@4ax.com...

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:32:57 -0400, "Osprey"

<noneedstoknow@mail.com>

wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message

news:1rdonv4uq0qf6vemcbe81js9lpqi3packu@4ax.com...

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:33:18 -0400, "Osprey"

<noneedstoknow@mail.com>

wrote:

"Paul Anderson" <elcoyote@netzero.net> wrote

message

news:3f7c2a82.1166869369@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...

On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 18:00:38 +1200, Mr J

delMonaco

<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:

Pat Winstanley wrote:

In article <3F7B4A92.7C96@excite.com>,

rtsimpson2003@excite.com

says...

Subject: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline

Again

From: "Robert T. Simpson"

<rtsimpson2003@excite.com>

Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

Mothers 4 Murder <killing@the.clinic>

wrote

news:3F79FCB0.2332@the.clinic:

Liberals and pro-aborts are a joke.

i've been reading this newsgroup

since

was

created

and

never

saw

anyone claim to be pro-abort. do you

have

any

evidence

that

anyone

is pro-abort?

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pro-abortion&db=*

pro-a�bor�tion (pr-b�rshn)
adj.

Favoring or supporting legalized

abortion.

There is nobody here who claims to

routinely

favour

(advocate,

support)

abortion (over the other possibility -

birth),

whether

the

abortion

question is legal or not.

Nobody claims that that's what pro-abortion

means -

except

you.

Nobody here is 'pro-abortion'.

Dictionaries say you're wrong.

The dictionary says that someone who is

pro-abortion

favors

supports legal abortion.

Wrong

the term is LEGALIZED

Do you know what LEGALIZED means?

Let me help you

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=legalized

le�gal�ize ( P ) Pronunciation Key

(lg-lz)

tr.v. le�gal�ized, le�gal�iz�ing, le�gal�iz�es
To make legal or lawful; authorize or

sanction

law

Now let me give you 4 different sources for

the

definition

pro-abortion,

and you will note. Not ONE of them says to

favor

and/or

support

LEGAL

abortion.

The say LEGALIZED abortion

Wow, you're stupid. If something has been

LEGALIZED,

LEGAL.

Therefore, legalized abortion is legal

abortion.

What an idiot you are.

The only idiot is you, and your idiotic attempt

twist

things.

doesn't

work

You are also leaving out the part

"authorize or santion by law"

Which is what makes something LEGAL. If something

has

been

legalized,

it is legal.

Are you really this stupid?

No, you are

Wrong. LEGALIZED means it is LEGAL.

Where are your sources?

????

What the ***** sources do I need, Bobby? Legalized

means

it's

already

legal. Check any dictionary.

Wow, you really are an idiot.

You sure do act like a baby when you can't get your way

Uh huh. Tell me, Bobby, when something has been

legalized,

legal or not?

And if not, what does legalized mean?

Are you still crying?

You pro-choice/aborts are such babies

No answer - legalized means it's legal. Same tactic as

always -

run

from the questions. Come back when you can claim even a

touch

honesty.

And you are still crying.

Not that you know what any of those words mean - after all,

you

don't

even know what 'legalized' means.

I think your tinfoil hat is interfering with your brain,

Bobby.

I'd

seek help for that meltdown you're having.

Still crying?

You are such a baby, and so easy to get uptight!!!

Do you support and/or favor legalized abortion?

Here goes another 10 post of Adam running around the

question..:o)

Once again, with emphasis:

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

That is run around #1

Lets try again

Do you support and/or favor legalized abortion?

Bobby, do you think that legalized abortion is encompassed by
'abortion'?

That is run around #2

Come on Adam, you got 8 more

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Asked and answered. Tell me, Bobby, what part of my answer is too
complex for you? You seem to be claiming that I haven't answered your
question in some way - now, what way is that? Answer this or ***** off.

That is run around #3

7 more and my prediction is right on

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Bobby, in what way is my previous reply not an answer?

Run around #4
Yes or No
The only two options to the question
Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?
.

User: "Adam H."
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 08:29:40 AM

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:17:40 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:a4qqnvovcljbaohr4imch5lhi7q3g6pqto@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:32:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

[snip]

Here goes another 10 post of Adam running around the

question..:o)

Once again, with emphasis:

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

That is run around #1

Lets try again

Do you support and/or favor legalized abortion?

Bobby, do you think that legalized abortion is encompassed by
'abortion'?

That is run around #2

Come on Adam, you got 8 more

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

That is run around #3

7 more and my prediction is right on

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Bobby, in what way is my previous reply not an answer?

Run around #4

Yes or No

The only two options to the question

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

And, as predicted (Prediction: Bobby will demonstrate that he knows
how to count from 8 to 7, claim that I'm avoiding the question without
explaining how "I don't favour abortion" avoids anything, and snip
this), I was exactly right.
Plus now he's trying to tell me what answers I'm allowed to give, thus
confirming that he's not interested in anything but what he'd like to
see. How sad for Bobby that all his little hissyfits and lies won't
change the real world. I guess when he's done his sentence he'll have
to re-adjust.
Now, Bobby, explain what's wrong with my answer. Explain to us all how
"I don't favour abortion" is NOT an answer to the question
"Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?"
(He'll snip this, claim a runaround again, show us he knows how to
count, because he's apparently to stupid to read the answer. This is
getting fun again).
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 08:54:40 AM

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:54uqnvchc6ot789idlprca17tqlsf0nqqk@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:17:40 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:a4qqnvovcljbaohr4imch5lhi7q3g6pqto@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:32:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

[snip]

Here goes another 10 post of Adam running around the

question..:o)

Once again, with emphasis:

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

That is run around #1

Lets try again

Do you support and/or favor legalized abortion?

Bobby, do you think that legalized abortion is encompassed by
'abortion'?

That is run around #2

Come on Adam, you got 8 more

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Asked and answered. Tell me, Bobby, what part of my answer is too
complex for you? You seem to be claiming that I haven't answered

your

question in some way - now, what way is that? Answer this or *****

off.

That is run around #3

7 more and my prediction is right on

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Bobby, in what way is my previous reply not an answer?

Run around #4

Yes or No

The only two options to the question

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

read above, the only two options to the questoin
Yes or No

Plus now he's trying to tell me what answers I'm allowed to give, thus
confirming that he's not interested in anything but what he'd like to
see. How sad for Bobby that all his little hissyfits and lies won't
change the real world. I guess when he's done his sentence he'll have
to re-adjust.

Now, Bobby, explain what's wrong with my answer. Explain to us all how
"I don't favour abortion" is NOT an answer to the question
"Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?"

(He'll snip this, claim a runaround again, show us he knows how to
count, because he's apparently to stupid to read the answer. This is
getting fun again).

You are running around again..:o)
It is getting fun, watching you try to come up with one lie after another
after another..:o)
.

User: "Adam H."
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 09:02:07 AM

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:54:40 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:54uqnvchc6ot789idlprca17tqlsf0nqqk@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:17:40 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:a4qqnvovcljbaohr4imch5lhi7q3g6pqto@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:32:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

[snip]

Here goes another 10 post of Adam running around the

question..:o)

Once again, with emphasis:

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

That is run around #1

Lets try again

Do you support and/or favor legalized abortion?

Bobby, do you think that legalized abortion is encompassed by
'abortion'?

That is run around #2

Come on Adam, you got 8 more

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Asked and answered. Tell me, Bobby, what part of my answer is too
complex for you? You seem to be claiming that I haven't answered

your

question in some way - now, what way is that? Answer this or *****

off.

That is run around #3

7 more and my prediction is right on

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Bobby, in what way is my previous reply not an answer?

Run around #4

Yes or No

The only two options to the question

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it the
drugs?

You are running around again..:o)

It is getting fun, watching you try to come up with one lie after another
after another..:o)

Yup. Prediction made. Now, Bobby, you skipped a number there, and I
don't think you're ready for it, but we'll let you try. What number am
I at now?
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 09:24:20 AM

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:b80rnv43q6pndt2267otgt4mvnclvs8758@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:54:40 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:54uqnvchc6ot789idlprca17tqlsf0nqqk@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:17:40 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:a4qqnvovcljbaohr4imch5lhi7q3g6pqto@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:32:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

[snip]

Here goes another 10 post of Adam running around the

question..:o)

Once again, with emphasis:

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

That is run around #1

Lets try again

Do you support and/or favor legalized abortion?

Bobby, do you think that legalized abortion is encompassed by
'abortion'?

That is run around #2

Come on Adam, you got 8 more

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Asked and answered. Tell me, Bobby, what part of my answer is too
complex for you? You seem to be claiming that I haven't answered

your

question in some way - now, what way is that? Answer this or *****

off.

That is run around #3

7 more and my prediction is right on

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Bobby, in what way is my previous reply not an answer?

Run around #4

Yes or No

The only two options to the question

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it the
drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

You are running around again..:o)

It is getting fun, watching you try to come up with one lie after another
after another..:o)

Yup. Prediction made. Now, Bobby, you skipped a number there, and I
don't think you're ready for it, but we'll let you try. What number am
I at now?
---

"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967

User: "David Barnes"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	04 Oct 2003 09:39:02 AM

In article <S6OdnWfT9fASG-CiXTWJjg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it the
drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

What if he were? What do you believe that would mean?
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	04 Oct 2003 10:06:26 AM

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020030739024783%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <S6OdnWfT9fASG-CiXTWJjg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it the
drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

What if he were? What do you believe that would mean?

Sorry David, but I am not interested in your babble.
Did you contact the AG yet?
.

User: "David Barnes"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	04 Oct 2003 04:52:05 PM

In article <WX-dne1twZdzfOOiXTWJlg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020030739024783%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <S6OdnWfT9fASG-CiXTWJjg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it the
drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

What if he were? What do you believe that would mean?

Sorry David, but I am not interested in your babble.

Did you contact the AG yet?

Does she know you taunt her with the idea that she doesn't care what
law enforcement officers do in Delaware?
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	04 Oct 2003 05:12:22 PM

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031452057698%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <WX-dne1twZdzfOOiXTWJlg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020030739024783%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <S6OdnWfT9fASG-CiXTWJjg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it the
drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

What if he were? What do you believe that would mean?

Sorry David, but I am not interested in your babble.

Did you contact the AG yet?

Does she know you taunt her with the idea that she doesn't care what
law enforcement officers do in Delaware?

Does she know your blatant disrespect and hateful comments you have made
regarding correctional officers?
.

User: "David Barnes"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	04 Oct 2003 07:18:51 PM

In article <qUqdndrDeohV2OKiXTWJkQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031452057698%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <WX-dne1twZdzfOOiXTWJlg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020030739024783%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <S6OdnWfT9fASG-CiXTWJjg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it the
drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

What if he were? What do you believe that would mean?

Sorry David, but I am not interested in your babble.

Did you contact the AG yet?

Does she know you taunt her with the idea that she doesn't care what
law enforcement officers do in Delaware?

Does she know your blatant disrespect and hateful comments you have made
regarding correctional officers?

Another lie.
And again, you seem unconcerned at the possibility that Attorney
General Brady will take disciplinary action against a rogue law
enforcement officer who goes onto a nation wide newsgroup and disgraces
his profession by pretending to know something about those who oppose
his opinions and then lies and defames them with lies that are
supposedly bolstered by his law enforcement resources and this
investigation. You claimed to have investigated me and to have
discovered I am a convicted felon who, as a condition of his parole, is
required to stay away from children and wear an ankle shackle. Do you
really believe she will look the other way if she is alerted to this?
Is she really that irresponsible or are you just bluffing?
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	04 Oct 2003 08:32:15 PM

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031718515703%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <qUqdndrDeohV2OKiXTWJkQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031452057698%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <WX-dne1twZdzfOOiXTWJlg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020030739024783%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <S6OdnWfT9fASG-CiXTWJjg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it

the

drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

What if he were? What do you believe that would mean?

Sorry David, but I am not interested in your babble.

Did you contact the AG yet?

Does she know you taunt her with the idea that she doesn't care what
law enforcement officers do in Delaware?

Does she know your blatant disrespect and hateful comments you have made
regarding correctional officers?

Another lie.

I quote just one of your comments about correctional officers
"No. I have seen how prison systems work. The guards are scared
shitless of the prisoners. This is why the violence in prisons is so
high. You are afraid to do your job. You are just looking to collect
that governmemt retirement on teh backs of the taxpayers."
.

User: "Patrick Humphrey"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	04 Oct 2003 08:43:39 PM

"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> writes:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031718515703%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <qUqdndrDeohV2OKiXTWJkQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031452057698%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <WX-dne1twZdzfOOiXTWJlg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020030739024783%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <S6OdnWfT9fASG-CiXTWJjg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

read above, the only two options to the questoin
Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it the
drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

What if he were? What do you believe that would mean?

Sorry David, but I am not interested in your babble.
Did you contact the AG yet?

Does she know you taunt her with the idea that she doesn't care what
law enforcement officers do in Delaware?

Does she know your blatant disrespect and hateful comments you have made
regarding correctional officers?

Another lie.

Of course, you just put matching CHR$(34)s at each end of a statement and
assume it's a quote, Robert. Where you fall on your face is: a unique
pointer to the alleged article you're quoting is missing, and you fail to
consider the possibility that he could be speaking of YOU when he says "you".
Keep playing stupid and drive the probabilities ever higher than someone
_will_ contact a few of your superiors, and then your fate is out of your
hands.
(That's the behavior I've come to expect from an illiterate cop reject whose
rare exhibitions of literacy in Usenet came in 1997:
----------
From: Robert Heishman <

>
Subject: Women to share interest in
Date: 1997/03/27
Message-ID: <333B04EC.1ED5@hotmail.com>
Distribution: inet
Organization: DelMarVa OnLine!
Reply-To:

Newsgroups: alt.fashion
I am looking for women to share my cross dressing interest with. I am
a male who loves womens fashions and love wearing them. However,
finding a woman who can basically become a best friend or shopping
partner is difficult. If any women reading this near the DE state,
and is interesting in sharing conversations with me or maybe shopping
let me know.
My address is

Thanks!
Bob
----------
I'm glad I don't have the imagination to be able to make *that* up.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.

User: "David Barnes"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	05 Oct 2003 12:42:01 AM

In article <3becndf99Io96eKiU-KYvg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031718515703%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <qUqdndrDeohV2OKiXTWJkQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031452057698%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <WX-dne1twZdzfOOiXTWJlg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020030739024783%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <S6OdnWfT9fASG-CiXTWJjg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it

the

drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

What if he were? What do you believe that would mean?

Sorry David, but I am not interested in your babble.

Did you contact the AG yet?

Does she know you taunt her with the idea that she doesn't care what
law enforcement officers do in Delaware?

Does she know your blatant disrespect and hateful comments you have made
regarding correctional officers?

Another lie.

I quote just one of your comments about correctional officers

"No. I have seen how prison systems work. The guards are scared
shitless of the prisoners. This is why the violence in prisons is so
high. You are afraid to do your job. You are just looking to collect
that governmemt retirement on teh backs of the taxpayers."

Hardly "hateful" and I was speaking of YOU.
.

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	05 Oct 2003 04:29:50 AM

On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 21:32:15 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031718515703%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <qUqdndrDeohV2OKiXTWJkQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020031452057698%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <WX-dne1twZdzfOOiXTWJlg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:041020030739024783%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...

In article <S6OdnWfT9fASG-CiXTWJjg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it

the

drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

What if he were? What do you believe that would mean?

Sorry David, but I am not interested in your babble.

Did you contact the AG yet?

Does she know you taunt her with the idea that she doesn't care what
law enforcement officers do in Delaware?

Does she know your blatant disrespect and hateful comments you have made
regarding correctional officers?

Another lie.

I quote just one of your comments about correctional officers

"No. I have seen how prison systems work. The guards are scared
shitless of the prisoners. This is why the violence in prisons is so
high. You are afraid to do your job. You are just looking to collect
that governmemt retirement on teh backs of the taxpayers."

He was referring to you, specifically, you dense pantsy.

User: "Ray Fischer"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	04 Oct 2003 12:55:21 PM

Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Sorry David, but I am not interested in your babble.

Snicker. 93% on the irony meter.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "Adam H."
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 09:35:31 AM

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 10:24:20 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:b80rnv43q6pndt2267otgt4mvnclvs8758@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:54:40 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:54uqnvchc6ot789idlprca17tqlsf0nqqk@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:17:40 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:a4qqnvovcljbaohr4imch5lhi7q3g6pqto@4ax.com...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:32:18 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

[snip]

Here goes another 10 post of Adam running around the

question..:o)

Once again, with emphasis:

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

That is run around #1

Lets try again

Do you support and/or favor legalized abortion?

Bobby, do you think that legalized abortion is encompassed by
'abortion'?

That is run around #2

Come on Adam, you got 8 more

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Asked and answered. Tell me, Bobby, what part of my answer is too
complex for you? You seem to be claiming that I haven't answered

your

question in some way - now, what way is that? Answer this or *****

off.

That is run around #3

7 more and my prediction is right on

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

Bobby, in what way is my previous reply not an answer?

Run around #4

Yes or No

The only two options to the question

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

read above, the only two options to the questoin

Yes or No

What makes you think you get to determine that, Bobby? Is it the
drugs?

Are you making a accusation?

Is it the drugs?

You are running around again..:o)

It is getting fun, watching you try to come up with one lie after another
after another..:o)

Yup. Prediction made. Now, Bobby, you skipped a number there, and I
don't think you're ready for it, but we'll let you try. What number am
I at now?
---

"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967

---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.

User: "Pat Winstanley"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 08:16:42 AM

In article <g0tpnv8mgvna00c74mflunjuet92hdn6l4@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...
[Adam]

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

[Robert, who seemingly cannot read]

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

[Adam, confirming that he does not favour abortion]

Asked and answered.

Robert clearly has a learning disability.

.

User: "Adam H."
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 08:19:04 AM

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:16:42 +0100, Pat Winstanley
<wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

In article <g0tpnv8mgvna00c74mflunjuet92hdn6l4@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

[Adam]

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

[Robert, who seemingly cannot read]

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

[Adam, confirming that he does not favour abortion]

Asked and answered.

Robert clearly has a learning disability.

I really don't get him. He's claiming that somehow I'm avoiding his
question - of course, he won't explain how. This meltdown of his would
worry me, if I gave a damn.
It was kind of funny at first, but it's getting boring now. He hasn't
changed at all in the past year, has he?
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 08:23:46 AM

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:16:42 +0100, Pat Winstanley
<wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

In article <g0tpnv8mgvna00c74mflunjuet92hdn6l4@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

[Adam]

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

[Robert, who seemingly cannot read]

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

[Adam, confirming that he does not favour abortion]

Asked and answered.

Robert clearly has a learning disability.

Robert clearly has self-control and lack-of-integrity issues. At least
people with disabilities do bother to try like hell to overcome their
disabilities - or seek another (unconventional) way of understanding
the material presented to them.
.

User: "Adam H."
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 08:31:53 AM

On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 09:23:46 -0400, Krisblake
<Krisblakemy2babies@xmsg.com> wrote:

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:16:42 +0100, Pat Winstanley
<wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

In article <g0tpnv8mgvna00c74mflunjuet92hdn6l4@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

[Adam]

I DON'T FAVOUR ABORTION.

[Robert, who seemingly cannot read]

Do you favor and/or support legalized abortion?

[Adam, confirming that he does not favour abortion]

Asked and answered.

Robert clearly has a learning disability.

Keep an eye on that thread, though - I'm going to see if he really
does know how to count to 10.
It's kind of like teasing a cat with a laser pointer, but without the
redeeming qualities of a cat.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.

User: "Pat Winstanley"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 04:55:28 AM

In article <ri1pnv004s9hcee4d095ks2vev7k123kij@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

Wrong. LEGALIZED means it is LEGAL.

Where are your sources?

????

What the ***** sources do I need, Bobby? Legalized means it's already
legal. Check any dictionary.

Wow, you really are an idiot.

He's trying to exercise control. The above idiocy is the best he can do
when faced with an average or abover average intellect... one that can
make someone with his very limited intellect scrabble for a lifebelt.
Perhaps we shouldn't be too hard on the poor chap... clearly he has a
learning disability of some type, for all he claims numerous academic
degrees!

.

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 04:58:18 AM

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 10:55:28 +0100, Pat Winstanley
<wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

In article <ri1pnv004s9hcee4d095ks2vev7k123kij@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

Wrong. LEGALIZED means it is LEGAL.

Where are your sources?

????

What the ***** sources do I need, Bobby? Legalized means it's already
legal. Check any dictionary.

Wow, you really are an idiot.

He's trying to exercise control. The above idiocy is the best he can do
when faced with an average or abover average intellect... one that can
make someone with his very limited intellect scrabble for a lifebelt.

Perhaps we shouldn't be too hard on the poor chap... clearly he has a
learning disability of some type, for all he claims numerous academic
degrees!

NUMEROUS academic degrees????????????????
.

User: "Pat Winstanley"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 11:43:04 AM

In article <v0iqnvka9dl42f2hvdu1peds090tps5erf@4ax.com>,
Krisblakemy2babies@xmsg.com says...

Subject: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again
From: Krisblake <Krisblakemy2babies@xmsg.com>
Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 10:55:28 +0100, Pat Winstanley
<wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

In article <ri1pnv004s9hcee4d095ks2vev7k123kij@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

Wrong. LEGALIZED means it is LEGAL.

Where are your sources?

????

What the ***** sources do I need, Bobby? Legalized means it's already
legal. Check any dictionary.

Wow, you really are an idiot.

He's trying to exercise control. The above idiocy is the best he can do
when faced with an average or abover average intellect... one that can
make someone with his very limited intellect scrabble for a lifebelt.

Perhaps we shouldn't be too hard on the poor chap... clearly he has a
learning disability of some type, for all he claims numerous academic
degrees!

NUMEROUS academic degrees????????????????

That's what he claims! ;-))
.

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 12:40:53 PM

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 17:43:04 +0100, Pat Winstanley
<wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

In article <v0iqnvka9dl42f2hvdu1peds090tps5erf@4ax.com>,
Krisblakemy2babies@xmsg.com says...

In article <ri1pnv004s9hcee4d095ks2vev7k123kij@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

Wrong. LEGALIZED means it is LEGAL.

Where are your sources?

????

What the ***** sources do I need, Bobby? Legalized means it's already
legal. Check any dictionary.

Wow, you really are an idiot.

He's trying to exercise control. The above idiocy is the best he can do
when faced with an average or abover average intellect... one that can
make someone with his very limited intellect scrabble for a lifebelt.

Perhaps we shouldn't be too hard on the poor chap... clearly he has a
learning disability of some type, for all he claims numerous academic
degrees!

NUMEROUS academic degrees????????????????

That's what he claims! ;-))

Do you remember off hand the thread in which such claim(s) was
made????? (I am trying to google a response and remain unsuccessful.)
.

User: "Pat Winstanley"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	03 Oct 2003 01:29:48 PM

In article <j1drnv063bf4kclhj5b1ga43ql7pg868of@4ax.com>,
Krisblakemy2babies@xmsg.com says...

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 17:43:04 +0100, Pat Winstanley
<wallopcods2003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

In article <v0iqnvka9dl42f2hvdu1peds090tps5erf@4ax.com>,
Krisblakemy2babies@xmsg.com says...

In article <ri1pnv004s9hcee4d095ks2vev7k123kij@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

Wrong. LEGALIZED means it is LEGAL.

Where are your sources?

????

What the ***** sources do I need, Bobby? Legalized means it's already
legal. Check any dictionary.

Wow, you really are an idiot.

He's trying to exercise control. The above idiocy is the best he can do
when faced with an average or abover average intellect... one that can
make someone with his very limited intellect scrabble for a lifebelt.

Perhaps we shouldn't be too hard on the poor chap... clearly he has a
learning disability of some type, for all he claims numerous academic
degrees!

NUMEROUS academic degrees????????????????

That's what he claims! ;-))

Do you remember off hand the thread in which such claim(s) was
made????? (I am trying to google a response and remain unsuccessful.)

I don't, Im afraid, but it was sometime in the last couple of weeks, I
think that he claimed he had one degree and was about to get another.
Someone, I think, made some comment about degree mills, if that helps?
Ah...here it is...
Message-ID: <2_ucneSCisHuDuiiU-KYhA@comcast.com>
I was mistaken... he only claims to actually have one degree but claims
to be working on another...
======================================================================
Being that I have a 4 year degree in Criminal Justice, working on my
second degree now. And I happen to make over 70k per year.
======================================================================
.

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	02 Oct 2003 05:11:15 AM

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:41:33 GMT, "Robert T. Simpson"
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

Mothers 4 Murder <killing@the.clinic> wrote in
news:3F79FCB0.2332@the.clinic:

Liberals and pro-aborts are a joke.

i've been reading this newsgroup since it was created and never saw
anyone claim to be pro-abort. do you have any evidence that anyone
is pro-abort?

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pro-abortion&db=*

pro-a�bor�tion (pr-b�rshn)
adj.

Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.

I see no person solely in favour of abortion.
.

User: "Adam H."
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	01 Oct 2003 04:57:20 PM

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:41:33 GMT, "Robert T. Simpson"
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

Mothers 4 Murder <killing@the.clinic> wrote in
news:3F79FCB0.2332@the.clinic:

Liberals and pro-aborts are a joke.

i've been reading this newsgroup since it was created and never saw
anyone claim to be pro-abort. do you have any evidence that anyone
is pro-abort?

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pro-abortion&db=*

pro-a�bor�tion (pr-b�rshn)
adj.

Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.

Oooh, again. Well, seeing as this can be boiled down to supporting
abortion (which happens to be legal), you'll have a hard time finding
people who actually do that. I don't know anybody who actually
supports or favours abortion - but I know plenty who favour/support
letting women make their own choices.
This is simply an explanation of something that seems to have been
misunderstood - there is a difference between supporting (x), and
supporting the legality of (x). Your definition above is the former,
not the latter, and is not an accurate characterization of the
pro-choice position.
---
"I contend that we are both atheists.
I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you dismiss all the
other possible gods, you will understand why
I dismiss yours."
- Stephen Roberts
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	01 Oct 2003 08:03:11 PM

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:76jmnv454m8p5pt0ok4bgubvk64cosomi7@4ax.com...

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:41:33 GMT, "Robert T. Simpson"
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

Mothers 4 Murder <killing@the.clinic> wrote in
news:3F79FCB0.2332@the.clinic:

Liberals and pro-aborts are a joke.

i've been reading this newsgroup since it was created and never saw
anyone claim to be pro-abort. do you have any evidence that anyone
is pro-abort?

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pro-abortion&db=*

pro-a�bor�tion (pr-b�rshn)
adj.

Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.

Favoring choice and favoring abortion remaining legal. Two different issues,
however they both play a part in the issue of pro-choice.
What you have though are people who want to ignore the one term because it
deals with the actual issue of abortion.

This is simply an explanation of something that seems to have been
misunderstood - there is a difference between supporting (x), and
supporting the legality of (x). Your definition above is the former,
not the latter, and is not an accurate characterization of the
pro-choice position.

How can one be pro-choice and NOT favor abortion remaining legal?
.

User: "Adam H."
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	01 Oct 2003 08:12:17 PM

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:03:11 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:76jmnv454m8p5pt0ok4bgubvk64cosomi7@4ax.com...

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:41:33 GMT, "Robert T. Simpson"
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

Mothers 4 Murder <killing@the.clinic> wrote in
news:3F79FCB0.2332@the.clinic:

Liberals and pro-aborts are a joke.

i've been reading this newsgroup since it was created and never saw
anyone claim to be pro-abort. do you have any evidence that anyone
is pro-abort?

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pro-abortion&db=*

pro-a�bor�tion (pr-b�rshn)
adj.

Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.

Favoring choice and favoring abortion remaining legal. Two different issues,
however they both play a part in the issue of pro-choice.

What you have though are people who want to ignore the one term because it
deals with the actual issue of abortion.

No, Bobby, what I have is the ability to understand that I can *not*
support abortion yet realise that it is necessary for women to have
the option.

How can one be pro-choice and NOT favor abortion remaining legal?

You probably can't. But 'pro-abortion' does *not* mean to favour
abortion remaining legal, so it's a moot point. The grammar is quite
simple and does not support what you prefer to think it means.
---
"I contend that we are both atheists.
I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you dismiss all the
other possible gods, you will understand why
I dismiss yours."
- Stephen Roberts
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again	01 Oct 2003 08:44:41 PM

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bmumnvc5q7beuio2gaf8pgumgif10n7sn1@4ax.com...

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:03:11 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:76jmnv454m8p5pt0ok4bgubvk64cosomi7@4ax.com...

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:41:33 GMT, "Robert T. Simpson"
<rtsimpson2003@excite.com> wrote:

james g. keegan jr. wrote:

Mothers 4 Murder <killing@the.clinic> wrote in
news:3F79FCB0.2332@the.clinic:

Liberals and pro-aborts are a joke.

i've been reading this newsgroup since it was created and never saw
anyone claim to be pro-abort. do you have any evidence that anyone
is pro-abort?

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pro-abortion&db=*

pro-a�bor�tion (pr-b�rshn)
adj.

Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.

Favoring choice and favoring abortion remaining legal. Two different

issues,

however they both play a part in the issue of pro-choice.

What you have though are people who want to ignore the one term because

deals with the actual issue of abortion.

No, Bobby, what I have is the ability to understand that I can *not*
support abortion yet realise that it is necessary for women to have
the option.

You don't have to support abortion, but you do support the procedure
remaining legal.
Which is what pro-abortion means.

How can one be pro-choice and NOT favor abortion remaining legal?

You probably can't.

Right, you can't.
But 'pro-abortion' does *not* mean to favour

abortion remaining legal, so it's a moot point.

Yes, that is exactly what it means and I have provide more than sufficient
proof.
The grammar is quite

simple and does not support what you prefer to think it means.

Amazing, I have consulted 5 different instructors at my college, and all 5
agree that is what it means.
5 out of 5
.

Page 3 of 7

Post reply

Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again
Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again
Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again
Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again
Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again
Re: Abortion Numbers Decline Again
Serial numbers may be required on bullets sold in California
Jewish Empathy for Blood of Innocents? ABORTION <<>> V4.1 S_0723

POLL: U.S. Voters Turn Against Bush in Record Numbers
God's poll numbers high - U.S. adults' belief in God overwhelming
Anti-Choice Terrorism: Bombings by the Numbers
New agriculture numbers published
PJ !! It's May 29th, and all's WELL!! Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's Poll Numbers are STILL in the DUMPSTER!!
Re: Serial numbers may be required on bullets sold in California
Abortion Drug RU 486 Likely More Dangerous Than FDA Numbers Suggest

Topics

Bible

Abortion

Atheism

Depression

Physics

Education

Philosophy

Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus

Politics-USA