| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"bobandcarole," |
| Date: |
24 Jun 2007 03:45:17 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
Ahhh, the country that's known for faggots and BC Bud...
Pedophile on centre's board for handicapped children
CanWest News Service
Published: Wednesday, June 20, 2007
A convicted pedophile was on the board of a centre housing
intellectually handicapped children until he was confronted by one of
his victims this month.
The head of the Centre Louise Bibeau in St. Hyacinthe, 65 kilometres
east of Montreal, learned about the man's prior convictions from
someone who had come to register her child at the facility.
Josiane Deslandes, 28, said she was sexually assaulted by Yves
Plante,
then her mother's boyfriend, for three years from the time she was 8
and testified at the closed hearing that put him away for 41/2 years.
He served a year and seven months, and when Deslandes took her 3-
year-
old daughter to register her on June 5, Plante was the one who opened
the door.
"Shock does not start to describe what I felt," Deslandes said.
The news also came as a shock to members of the centre's board. "It
was like the world flipped upside down," board member Daniel Lanoie
said.
Soon after Deslandes notified the board, Plante was told to "cease
his
activities" at the centre, Lanoie said.
Plante quit his post last week at the end of his term, which was to
oversee the reconstruction of the building, he said.
"He was not in contact with children, but he was still here
.
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
24 Jun 2007 04:41:30 PM |
|
|
Notice:
I am posting this one message to the groups listed.
Any failure to allow this message to be posted to all of those groups will
be considered an act of treason.
"bobandcarole," <bobandcarole202@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182717917.646476.85080@u2g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Ahhh, the country that's known for faggots and BC Bud...
Pedophile on centre's board for handicapped children
CanWest News Service
Published: Wednesday, June 20, 2007
A convicted pedophile was on the board of a centre housing
intellectually handicapped children until he was confronted by one of
his victims this month.
The head of the Centre Louise Bibeau in St. Hyacinthe, 65 kilometres
east of Montreal, learned about the man's prior convictions from
someone who had come to register her child at the facility.
Josiane Deslandes, 28, said she was sexually assaulted by Yves
Plante,
then her mother's boyfriend, for three years from the time she was 8
and testified at the closed hearing that put him away for 41/2 years.
He served a year and seven months, and when Deslandes took her 3-
year-
old daughter to register her on June 5, Plante was the one who opened
the door.
"Shock does not start to describe what I felt," Deslandes said.
The news also came as a shock to members of the centre's board. "It
was like the world flipped upside down," board member Daniel Lanoie
said.
Soon after Deslandes notified the board, Plante was told to "cease
his
activities" at the centre, Lanoie said.
Plante quit his post last week at the end of his term, which was to
oversee the reconstruction of the building, he said.
"He was not in contact with children, but he was still here
Contrary to popular opinion, it seems that the termination action of this
organization is unjust.
When will the judicial system stop acting as if women can have unborn
children aborted and gays dictating policy that illegally deprives persons
of any of the three inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness without just cause?
The story mentioned that the individual who was terminated had already
served a sentence, so there is no legal method to discriminate against him
in employment; and, because there was no mention of any crime he committed
while on this board the termination action does not carry 'for cause' legal
standing.
Similar to MADD's anti-liberty and thievery agenda, this action seems to be
an action based on the imaginations of those who decided to terminate this
person from his involvement with their group rather than on any reported
actual infraction of any law that had not been 'paid for' already.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
24 Jun 2007 05:45:56 PM |
|
|
On 24 Jun., 23:41, "John D. Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
Notice:
I am posting this one message to the groups listed.
Any failure to allow this message to be posted to all of those groups will
be considered an act of treason."bobandcarole," <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
I took one group off... What are you gonna do, convict Wentzky? Sue
me?
news:1182717917.646476.85080@u2g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Contrary to popular opinion, it seems that the termination action of this
organization is unjust.
When will the judicial system stop acting as if women can have unborn
children aborted
Hint: it's legal in all of civilized countries. Get used to it.
and gays dictating policy that illegally deprives persons
of any of the three inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness without just cause?
When does this happen?
The story mentioned that the individual who was terminated had already
served a sentence, so there is no legal method to discriminate against him
in employment;
Now, that's something you know about, right Wentzky?
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
24 Jun 2007 06:03:32 PM |
|
|
Notice:
I am posting this one message to the groups listed.
Any failure to allow this message to be posted to all of those groups will
be considered an act of treason.
<parsifal50@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182725156.903279.202080@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On 24 Jun., 23:41, "John D. Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
Notice:
I am posting this one message to the groups listed.
Any failure to allow this message to be posted to all of those groups
will
be considered an act of treason."bobandcarole,"
<bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Contrary to popular opinion, it seems that the termination action of this
organization is unjust.
When will the judicial system stop acting as if women can have unborn
children aborted
and gays dictating policy that illegally deprives persons
of any of the three inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit
of
happiness without just cause?
When does this happen?
You didn't comprehend the story in this thread?
The story mentioned that the individual who was terminated had already
served a sentence, so there is no legal method to discriminate against
him
in employment;
Now, that's something you know about, right Wentzky?
So, you aren't serious about discussing the thread.
Maybe there is a legal method to deny employment, but once employment is
granted, how does one terminate an employee who is not in violation of the
hiring organization's activities?
When will the government's realize that once a person serves a sentence they
are no longer guilty of the charge they were punished for?
Committing acts against persons who already paid the legal penalty for a
crime would be excessive punishment, a constitutionally forbidden practice.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
24 Jun 2007 08:38:13 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:41:30 -0400, John D. Wentzky wrote:
Notice:
I am posting this one message to the groups listed. Any failure to allow
this message to be posted to all of those groups will be considered an
act of treason.
WHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
Oh ***** you're funny Wentinsane...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"You believe in a book that has talking animals, wizards,
witches, demons, sticks turning into snakes, food falling
from the sky, people walking on water, and all sorts of magical,
absurd and primitive stories, and you say that *we* are the
ones that need help?" - Jon Stoll
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
24 Jun 2007 05:43:33 PM |
|
|
On 24 Jun., 22:45, "bobandcarole," <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Ahhh, the country that's known for faggots and BC Bud...
Now, watch your mouth or you will lose this account too...
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
24 Jun 2007 06:14:41 PM |
|
|
On Jun 24, 6:43?pm, wrote:
On 24 Jun., 22:45, "bobandcarole," <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Ahhh, the country that's known for faggots and BC Bud...
Now, watch your mouth or you will lose this account too...
Watch this...***** YOU..
See ya tomorrow...
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 02:06:44 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jun., 01:14, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 24, 6:43?pm, wrote:
On 24 Jun., 22:45, "bobandcarole," <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Ahhh, the country that's known for faggots and BC Bud...
Now, watch your mouth or you will lose this account too...
Watch this...***** YOU..
You're cute when you're angry...
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 07:38:16 AM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 3:06?am, wrote:
On 25 Jun., 01:14, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 24, 6:43?pm, wrote:
On 24 Jun., 22:45, "bobandcarole," <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Ahhh, the country that's known for faggots and BC Bud...
Now, watch your mouth or you will lose this account too...
Watch this...***** YOU..
You're cute when you're angry...
Why would I be angry? You're the one that lost your account
and you're the one that's too bone fuckin stupid to know why.
You're a joke, another easy mark that steps and fetches on
command. It's quite amusing to yank your chain and watch
you ***** your panties and whine.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 03:08:58 PM |
|
|
On 25 Jun., 14:38, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 25, 3:06?am, wrote:
On 25 Jun., 01:14, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 24, 6:43?pm, wrote:
On 24 Jun., 22:45, "bobandcarole," <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Ahhh, the country that's known for faggots and BC Bud...
Now, watch your mouth or you will lose this account too...
Watch this...***** YOU..
You're cute when you're angry...
Why would I be angry?
Because you lost one account. And your butt-friend, J Young, too.
You're the one that lost your account
and you're the one that's too bone fuckin stupid to know why.
I know why: because you lied about me since I never posted anything
offensive, beside when I was answering to you or J Young.
I'm not the homophobic, racist, liar... You are.
You're a joke, another easy mark that steps and fetches on
command. It's quite amusing to yank your chain and watch
you ***** your panties and whine.
Look at you, look at the answers you get.
You're the joke, Mr. self-loathing closet gay...
How's the trolling on discussion groups on homosexuality?
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole.." |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 09:27:13 PM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 4:08?pm, wrote:
On 25 Jun., 14:38, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 25, 3:06?am, wrote:
On 25 Jun., 01:14, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 24, 6:43?pm, wrote:
On 24 Jun., 22:45, "bobandcarole," <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Ahhh, the country that's known for faggots and BC Bud...
Now, watch your mouth or you will lose this account too...
Watch this...***** YOU..
You're cute when you're angry...
Why would I be angry?
Because you lost one account. And your butt-friend, J Young, too.
You're the one that lost your account
and you're the one that's too bone fuckin stupid to know why.
I know why: because you lied about me since I never posted anything
offensive, beside when I was answering to you or J Young.
I'm not the homophobic, racist, liar... You are.
You're a joke, another easy mark that steps and fetches on
command. It's quite amusing to yank your chain and watch
you ***** your panties and whine.
Look at you, look at the answers you get.
I wouldn't expect any different from you or your playmates.
You're the joke, Mr. self-loathing closet gay...
When are ya goin to prove that lie?
How's the trolling on discussion groups on homosexuality?
Just fine, ***** you for asking....
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
26 Jun 2007 04:03:15 AM |
|
|
On 26 juin, 04:27, "bobandcarole.." <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Jun 25, 4:08?pm, wrote:
On 25 Jun., 14:38, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 25, 3:06?am, wrote:
On 25 Jun., 01:14, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 24, 6:43?pm, wrote:
On 24 Jun., 22:45, "bobandcarole," <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Ahhh, the country that's known for faggots and BC Bud...
Now, watch your mouth or you will lose this account too...
Watch this...***** YOU..
You're cute when you're angry...
Why would I be angry?
Because you lost one account. And your butt-friend, J Young, too.
You're the one that lost your account
and you're the one that's too bone fuckin stupid to know why.
I know why: because you lied about me since I never posted anything
offensive, beside when I was answering to you or J Young.
I'm not the homophobic, racist, liar... You are.
You're a joke, another easy mark that steps and fetches on
command. It's quite amusing to yank your chain and watch
you ***** your panties and whine.
Look at you, look at the answers you get.
I wouldn't expect any different from you or your playmates.
Sure Bob, sure... Every one thinks you're a moron but we're all
wrong...
You're the joke, Mr. self-loathing closet gay...
When are ya goin to prove that lie?
No hetero spends a tenth of the time you spend thinking about
homosexuality, writing to discussion groups about homosexuality or
searching for articles/photos on homosexuality.
If you were happy with your own sexuality, you wouldn't think all the
time, day and night, 7 days a week, about gay sex.
Classic.
How's the trolling on discussion groups on homosexuality?
Just fine, ***** you for asking....-
Wow, you are cranky, Mr. self-loathing closet gay.
I'm sure that if you came out of the closet, you'd feel better about
yourself...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Medusa" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
28 Jun 2007 10:28:26 AM |
|
|
On Jun 26, 4:03 am, wrote:
Sure Bob, sure... Every one thinks you're a moron but we're all
wrong...
You're the joke, Mr. self-loathing closet gay...
When are ya goin to prove that lie?
No hetero spends a tenth of the time you spend thinking about
homosexuality, writing to discussion groups about homosexuality or
searching for articles/photos on homosexuality.
If you were happy with your own sexuality, you wouldn't think all the
time, day and night, 7 days a week, about gay sex.
Classic.
How's the trolling on discussion groups on homosexuality?
Just fine, ***** you for asking....-
Wow, you are cranky, Mr. self-loathing closet gay.
I'm sure that if you came out of the closet, you'd feel better about
yourself
Exactly. He also has pedophilia leanings. Let's just hope that stays
in the closet.
Medusa
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
28 Jun 2007 10:41:09 AM |
|
|
On Jun 28, 11:28?am, Medusa <Medusa4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 26, 4:03 am, wrote:
Sure Bob, sure... Every one thinks you're a moron but we're all
wrong...
You're the joke, Mr. self-loathing closet gay...
When are ya goin to prove that lie?
No hetero spends a tenth of the time you spend thinking about
homosexuality, writing to discussion groups about homosexuality or
searching for articles/photos on homosexuality.
If you were happy with your own sexuality, you wouldn't think all the
time, day and night, 7 days a week, about gay sex.
Classic.
How's the trolling on discussion groups on homosexuality?
Just fine, ***** you for asking....-
Wow, you are cranky, Mr. self-loathing closet gay.
I'm sure that if you came out of the closet, you'd feel better about
yourself
Exactly. He also has pedophilia leanings. Let's just hope that stays
in the closet.
Better have proof to back up that lie, sewer *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sniper .308" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 03:18:30 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:08:58 -0700, wrote:
You're a joke, another easy mark that steps and fetches on
command. It's quite amusing to yank your chain and watch
you ***** your panties and whine.
You mean like you do?
Look at you, look at the answers you get.
You're the joke, Mr. self-loathing closet gay...
Not to mention a proven spineless coward, liar, and racist bag of *****
How's the trolling on discussion groups on homosexuality?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sasha" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 08:38:37 AM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 8:38 am, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
It's quite amusing to yank your chain and watch
you ***** your panties and whine.
Also known as Bob's Friday night with young boys.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Senrab Nageek" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
24 Jun 2007 04:28:10 PM |
|
|
On Jun 24, 3:45 pm, "bobandcarole," <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
[...]
Pedophile on centre's board for handicapped children
CanWest News Service
Published: Wednesday, June 20, 2007
A convicted pedophile was on the board of a centre housing
intellectually handicapped children until he was confronted by one of
his victims this month.
You, IBen?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Whack A Whigger" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 05:26:37 PM |
|
|
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was because
they're homosexuals!
Wonder how this guy found a little girl to molest? Maybe he has better
eyesight than these homosexual priests, no?
Hmm, could it be these homosexual priests (GASP!) prefer little boys?
Naaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwww, couldn't be.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 05:48:08 PM |
|
|
In News 1182810397.002393.251720@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibapour@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as well. You
should try reading, you might actually learn something.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whack A Whigger" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 06:32:46 PM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as well. You
should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks and eat
*****, but you lie like crazy, too. I have read extensively on this
subject, and the cold reality is that the overwhelming majority of
children molested by these ***** priests were young boys. No amount
of lying about this by you and the rest of your cocksucking pals will
ever change this reality.
Every single time you faggots and leftists get called on something,
you pull this ***** about the rest of us not being up on the facts, or
being ignorant, or being ill-tutored fools. No, pal, you're a fucking
liar, period. And I have a strong hunch you also know the numbers
here. You lie like crazy about this because you'd rather not face the
implications of it, namely that homosexual men are disproportionately
pedophiles, abbeit with young boys as the target. You can count on one
hand the little girls molested by priests, especially in the last 25
years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 09:19:03 PM |
|
|
"Whack A Whigger" <nibapour@guerrillamail.net> wrote in message
news:1182814366.736823.214230@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as well.
You
should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks and eat
*****, but you lie like crazy, too. I have read extensively on this
subject, and the cold reality is that the overwhelming majority of
children molested by these ***** priests were young boys. No amount
of lying about this by you and the rest of your cocksucking pals will
ever change this reality.
Every single time you faggots and leftists get called on something,
you pull this ***** about the rest of us not being up on the facts, or
being ignorant, or being ill-tutored fools. No, pal, you're a fucking
liar, period. And I have a strong hunch you also know the numbers
here. You lie like crazy about this because you'd rather not face the
implications of it, namely that homosexual men are disproportionately
pedophiles, abbeit with young boys as the target. You can count on one
hand the little girls molested by priests, especially in the last 25
years.
Wow, does this nutcase have issues! He sounds like
a typical repressed closet case.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 09:35:43 PM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> writes:
"Whack A Whigger" <nibapour@guerrillamail.net> wrote in message
news:1182814366.736823.214230@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as well.
You
should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks and eat
*****, but you lie like crazy, too. I have read extensively on this
subject, and the cold reality is that the overwhelming majority of
children molested by these ***** priests were young boys. No amount
of lying about this by you and the rest of your cocksucking pals will
ever change this reality.
Every single time you faggots and leftists get called on something,
you pull this ***** about the rest of us not being up on the facts, or
being ignorant, or being ill-tutored fools. No, pal, you're a fucking
liar, period. And I have a strong hunch you also know the numbers
here. You lie like crazy about this because you'd rather not face the
implications of it, namely that homosexual men are disproportionately
pedophiles, abbeit with young boys as the target. You can count on one
hand the little girls molested by priests, especially in the last 25
years.
Wow, does this nutcase have issues! He sounds like
a typical repressed closet case.
"He" is a "she" who previously posted as "Cleopatra" (and she just
confirmed it accidentally in a response to one of my posts).
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 06:45:19 PM |
|
|
In News 1182814366.736823.214230@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibapour@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack
A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as well.
You should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks
Never sucked a ***** in my life, you seem to be well aquainted with it
though. As far as lying....
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258678.htm
http://pandagon.net/2007/01/19/priest-blames-girls-for-their-molestation/
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_08_18_Bunting_SexAbuse.htm
http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/kelley_abused_dozens.htm
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/page121-fasciale.html
That's just five of the 430 links that came up on google. Priests have
molested many girls as well.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whack A Whigger" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 07:26:02 PM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 4:45 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182814366.736823.214...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack
A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as well.
You should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks
Never sucked a ***** in my life, you seem to be well aquainted with it
though. As far as lying....
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258678.htm
http://pandagon.net/2007/01/19/priest-blames-girls-for-their-molestat...
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_08_18_Bunting_SexAbuse...
http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/kelley_abused_dozens.htm
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/page121-fasciale.html
That's just five of the 430 links that came up on google. Priests have
molested many girls as well.
Sir, did I suggesst that "no" girls were molested? No, what I said was
that these molestation cases by priests overwhelmingly involved
homosexual men and young boys. The fact that a few girls were molested
in no way alters that glaring fact.
As for googling links re this matter, I can google them all day
myself, and all the data suggests relatively few girls were molested.
Why would they molest girls, sir. By their own admission[s] they were
predominately homosexual in sexual orientation.
Lastly, as a matter of simple common sense, pedophiles, homosexual or
otherwise, spend their entire lives positioning themselves in carreers
and occupations where they will have unfettered access to children,
especially where they are viewed as authority figures such as coaches,
teachers, athletic instructors and various other positions where they
can be said to mentor children. What better place to do this than a
church, and as a priest who is almost Godlike as an authority figure
in many unsophisticated parish settings, and by simple-minded parents
as well.
Sir, ya go where the action is, and no one knows this better than a
pedophile, straight OR homosexual.
http://www.jefflindsay.com/snippets/gay-priests.shtml
Eighty-one percent of sex crimes committed against children by Roman
Catholic priests during the past 52 years were homosexual men preying
on boys, according to a comprehensive study released yesterday on the
church's sex abuse crisis."
http://skeptically.org/hhor/id7.html
"GOLETA, Calif. - For more than two decades, Roman Catholic priests
sexually abused boys aged 7 -to 16 at a boarding school in a Santa
Barbara seminary, a panel organized by a Franciscan order concluded.
A board of inquiry for the St. Barbara Province of the Francis=ADcan
Order said Monday that 12 priests engaged in nude games, fondling and
other sex acts with students at St. Anthony's Semi=ADnary from 1964 to
1987, when it closed because of financial prob=ADlems. So far, 34 boys,
mostly teenag=ADers, have been identified as vic=ADtims."
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/03/03/Opinion/A__terrible_history_.shtml
"A church panel issued its findings last week on the sexual abuse of
children by America's Roman Catholic priests, and the results are
staggering. From 1950 to 2002, 10,667 abuse claims were lodged against
4,392 priests. Most of the victims were teenage or preteen boys,
nearly half were abused for a year or longer and predatory priests,
more often than not, had no qualms about molesting on church property.
Rampant assaults on children were tolerated, an open secret, because
pedophile priests learned not to fear the families, the church or
civil authorities."
http://www.catholicleague.org/research/abuse_in_social_context.htm
"Almost all the priests who abuse children are homosexuals. Dr.
Thomas Plante, a psychologist at Santa Clara University, found that
"80 to 90% of all priests who in fact abuse minors have sexually
engaged with adolescent boys, not prepubescent children. Thus, the
teenager is more at risk than the young altar boy or girls of any
age."[viii]"
And it goes on and on and on and on................
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 07:29:28 PM |
|
|
In News 1182817562.946134.160020@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibapour@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 4:45 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182814366.736823.214...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was
because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as
well. You should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks
Never sucked a ***** in my life, you seem to be well aquainted with it
though. As far as lying....
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258678.htm
http://pandagon.net/2007/01/19/priest-blames-girls-for-their-molestat...
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_08_18_Bunting_SexAbuse...
http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/kelley_abused_dozens.htm
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/page121-fasciale.html
That's just five of the 430 links that came up on google. Priests
have molested many girls as well.
Sir, did I suggesst that "no" girls were molested? No, what I said was
that these molestation cases by priests overwhelmingly involved
homosexual men and young boys.
And the numbers simply do not add up to "overwhelmingly", a majority are
boys, but not an "overwhelming" majority.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whack A Whigger" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 08:48:29 PM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 5:29 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182817562.946134.160...@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 4:45 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182814366.736823.214...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was
because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as
well. You should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks
Never sucked a ***** in my life, you seem to be well aquainted with it
though. As far as lying....
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258678.htm
http://pandagon.net/2007/01/19/priest-blames-girls-for-their-molestat...
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_08_18_Bunting_SexAbuse...
http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/kelley_abused_dozens.htm
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/page121-fasciale.html
That's just five of the 430 links that came up on google. Priests
have molested many girls as well.
Sir, did I suggesst that "no" girls were molested? No, what I said was
that these molestation cases by priests overwhelmingly involved
homosexual men and young boys.
And the numbers simply do not add up to "overwhelmingly", a majority are
boys, but not an "overwhelming" majority.- Hide quoted text -
Sir, where I come from, anything over 70% constitutes an overwhelming
majority, and we're here talking about roughly 80% of the molestations
involving Catholic priests being those of young boys, principally
boys in the age group of 11 to 17 years old. Moreover, almost every
single one of these priests in extensive interviews self-identified
themselves as homosexuals.
You're hanging on to a thread quibbling about what constitutes
overwhelming, but I can tell you, sir, that ANY election, anywhere in
the world and at any level of government, wherein any candidate got
over 65% of the vote would be considered overwhelming, even by the
defeated candidates. Over 65% of ANYTHING is almost impossible to
achieve, and if you don't believe it, try Las Vegas. In point of fact,
sir, they build those billion dollar casinos with and average house
edge of about 7% on all venues, which is to say they take the rake 57%
of the time and you win 47% of the time. Bet for any length of time
and you will NEVER beat those grinding odds.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 08:50:01 PM |
|
|
In News 1182822509.624616.219280@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibapour@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 5:29 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182817562.946134.160...@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 4:45 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182814366.736823.214...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was
because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as
well. You should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks
Never sucked a ***** in my life, you seem to be well aquainted with
it though. As far as lying....
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258678.htm
http://pandagon.net/2007/01/19/priest-blames-girls-for-their-molestat...
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_08_18_Bunting_SexAbuse...
http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/kelley_abused_dozens.htm
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/page121-fasciale.html
That's just five of the 430 links that came up on google. Priests
have molested many girls as well.
Sir, did I suggesst that "no" girls were molested? No, what I said
was that these molestation cases by priests overwhelmingly involved
homosexual men and young boys.
And the numbers simply do not add up to "overwhelmingly", a majority
are boys, but not an "overwhelming" majority.- Hide quoted text -
Sir, where I come from, anything over 70% constitutes an overwhelming
majority, and we're here talking about roughly 80%
Cite your source for this number. No law enforcement agency has yet placed
that number above 61%.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whack A Whigger" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 09:18:44 PM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 6:50 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182822509.624616.219...@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 5:29 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182817562.946134.160...@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 4:45 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182814366.736823.214...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was
because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as
well. You should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks
Never sucked a ***** in my life, you seem to be well aquainted with
it though. As far as lying....
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258678.htm
http://pandagon.net/2007/01/19/priest-blames-girls-for-their-molestat...
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_08_18_Bunting_SexAbuse...
http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/kelley_abused_dozens.htm
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/page121-fasciale.html
That's just five of the 430 links that came up on google. Priests
have molested many girls as well.
Sir, did I suggesst that "no" girls were molested? No, what I said
was that these molestation cases by priests overwhelmingly involved
homosexual men and young boys.
And the numbers simply do not add up to "overwhelmingly", a majority
are boys, but not an "overwhelming" majority.- Hide quoted text -
Sir, where I come from, anything over 70% constitutes an overwhelming
majority, and we're here talking about roughly 80%
Cite your source for this number. No law enforcement agency has yet placed
that number above 61%.- Hide quoted text -
Andy, I already gave you cites, and to post more would serve merely to
cloud the issue. Your reaction here is precisely why I now
categorically refuse to furnish endless cites and reams of
documentation for what is common knowledge and in the public domain.
Invariably, people like you and Keegan say "So what" - and after
having demanded all that documentation.
As I have said to Spartakus so many times, sir, in these arguments
over social and political issues, the "facts" are almost never in
dispute and generally stipulated to. It's the interpretation of those
"facts" and how they fit into one's world view which is the problem,
as it were. Again, this is why I no longer take the time to "document"
that which is so readily available in the public domain. And I don't
do it because it's generally a ruse, the final result being, "So
what?"
Like, why the ***** did you demand the documentation to begin with?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
26 Jun 2007 05:20:35 AM |
|
|
In News 1182824324.775970.217610@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibapour@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 6:50 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182822509.624616.219...@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 5:29 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182817562.946134.160...@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 4:45 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182814366.736823.214...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET>
wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,,
Whack A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church
that "pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are
no little Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I
thought it was because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as
well. You should try reading, you might actually learn
something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks
Never sucked a ***** in my life, you seem to be well aquainted
with it though. As far as lying....
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258678.htm
http://pandagon.net/2007/01/19/priest-blames-girls-for-their-molestat...
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_08_18_Bunting_SexAbuse...
http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/kelley_abused_dozens.htm
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/page121-fasciale.html
That's just five of the 430 links that came up on google.
Priests have molested many girls as well.
Sir, did I suggesst that "no" girls were molested? No, what I said
was that these molestation cases by priests overwhelmingly
involved homosexual men and young boys.
And the numbers simply do not add up to "overwhelmingly", a
majority are boys, but not an "overwhelming" majority.- Hide
quoted text -
Sir, where I come from, anything over 70% constitutes an
overwhelming majority, and we're here talking about roughly 80%
Cite your source for this number. No law enforcement agency has
yet placed that number above 61%.- Hide quoted text -
Andy, I already gave you cites, and to post more would serve merely to
cloud the issue.
I read the cites. None of them stated roughly 80%.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole.." |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 09:47:58 PM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 8:26=EF=BF=BDpm, Whack A Whigger <nibap...@guerrillamail.net>
wrote:
On Jun 25, 4:45 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182814366.736823.214...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack
A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as well.
You should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks
Never sucked a ***** in my life, you seem to be well aquainted with it
though. =A0As far as lying....
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258678.htm
http://pandagon.net/2007/01/19/priest-blames-girls-for-their-molestat...
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_08_18_Bunting_SexAbuse...
http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/kelley_abused_dozens.htm
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/page121-fasciale.html
That's just five of the 430 links that came up on google. =A0Priests ha=
ve
molested many girls as well.
Sir, did I suggesst that "no" girls were molested? No, what I said was
that these molestation cases by priests overwhelmingly involved
homosexual men and young boys. The fact that a few girls were molested
in no way alters that glaring fact.
As for googling links re this matter, I can google them all day
myself, and all the data suggests relatively few girls were molested.
Why would they molest girls, sir. By their own admission[s] they were
predominately homosexual in sexual orientation.
Lastly, as a matter of simple common sense, pedophiles, homosexual or
otherwise, spend their entire lives positioning themselves in carreers
and occupations where they will have unfettered access to children,
especially where they are viewed as authority figures such as coaches,
teachers, athletic instructors and various other positions where they
can be said to mentor children. What better place to do this than a
church, and as a priest who is almost Godlike as an authority figure
in many unsophisticated parish settings, and by simple-minded parents
as well.
Sir, ya go where the action is, and no one knows this better than a
pedophile, straight OR homosexual.
http://www.jefflindsay.com/snippets/gay-priests.shtml
Eighty-one percent of sex crimes committed against children by Roman
Catholic priests during the past 52 years were homosexual men preying
on boys, according to a comprehensive study released yesterday on the
church's sex abuse crisis."
http://skeptically.org/hhor/id7.html
"GOLETA, Calif. - For more than two decades, Roman Catholic priests
sexually abused boys aged 7 -to 16 at a boarding school in a Santa
Barbara seminary, a panel organized by a Franciscan order concluded.
A board of inquiry for the St. Barbara Province of the Francis=ADcan
Order said Monday that 12 priests engaged in nude games, fondling and
other sex acts with students at St. Anthony's Semi=ADnary from 1964 to
1987, when it closed because of financial prob=ADlems. So far, 34 boys,
mostly teenag=ADers, have been identified as vic=ADtims."
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/03/03/Opinion/A__terrible_history_.shtml
"A church panel issued its findings last week on the sexual abuse of
children by America's Roman Catholic priests, and the results are
staggering. From 1950 to 2002, 10,667 abuse claims were lodged against
4,392 priests. Most of the victims were teenage or preteen boys,
nearly half were abused for a year or longer and predatory priests,
more often than not, had no qualms about molesting on church property.
Rampant assaults on children were tolerated, an open secret, because
pedophile priests learned not to fear the families, the church or
civil authorities."
http://www.catholicleague.org/research/abuse_in_social_context.htm
"Almost all the priests who abuse children are homosexuals. =A0Dr.
Thomas Plante, a psychologist at Santa Clara University, found that
"80 to 90% of all priests who in fact abuse minors have sexually
engaged with adolescent boys, not prepubescent children. =A0Thus, the
teenager is more at risk than the young altar boy or girls of any
age."[viii]"
And it goes on and on and on and on................- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
APPLAUSE!!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole.." |
|
| Title: Re: Another Canadian kiddiefucker exposed |
25 Jun 2007 09:28:31 PM |
|
|
On Jun 25, 7:45?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182814366.736823.214...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack A
Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
On Jun 25, 3:48 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1182810397.002393.251...@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com,, Whack
A Whigger at nibap...@guerrillamail.net, typed this:
Sir, it would appear that it's only in the Catholic church that
"pedophiles" molest young boys. Must be that there are no little
Catholic girls I suppose. And all the while I thought it was because
There's been a number of Catholic girls molested by priests as well.
You should try reading, you might actually learn something.
Sir, not only do you nasty, degenerate sodomists suck dicks
Never sucked a ***** in my life,
ROTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you seem to be well aquainted with it
though. As far as lying....
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258678.htm
http://pandagon.net/2007/01/19/priest-blames-girls-for-their-molestat...
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_08_18_Bunting_SexAbuse...
http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/kelley_abused_dozens.htm
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/page121-fasciale.html
That's just five of the 430 links that came up on google. Priests have
molested many girls as well.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|