| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
01 Aug 2006 07:45:04 AM |
| Object: |
Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
In article <1154419109.417348.31380@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
Women will no longer be controlled by women-hating anti-choice pigs:
Rape Victim Denied Morning-After Pill
By Tom Bowman and Diana Fishlock
Religion News Service
LEBANON, Pa., July 26 -- A hospital emergency room doctor in central
Pennsylvania refused to give a rape victim a morning-after pill because
it would be against his Mennonite religious beliefs.
Rebuffed by the doctor at Lebanon County's Good Samaritan Hospital on
Saturday (July 22), the woman called her gynecologist, who wrote the
prescription. Her local pharmacy told her it was out of the drug and
referred her to another store about 25 miles away.
Emergency contraception, often called the morning-after pill, gives a
high dosage of birth control medicine that can prevent pregnancy.
It's a pill that Dr. Martin Gish, the physician who treated the rape
victim, said he has prescribed previously.
"This is an issue I've struggled with for years," Gish said. "My
current feeling is life begins at conception."
"The dilemma I have is the whole rape issue -- Which side are you more
concerned with? Are you more concerned about the mother or the life
that was possibly created? That's my dilemma," Gish said. "I personally
don't have this thing worked out. I'm not sure how my faith can line up
with my practice at times of what I'm asked to do."
The state backs up his refusal.
Hospitals are not required to prescribe emergency contraception pills,
and Pennsylvania does not keep statistics on how many do, said Richard
McGarvey, spokesman for the state Health Department.
"There is a law that says if a hospital chooses not to provide a
treatment for religious reasons, they can do that," McGarvey said.
Dr. Mark Jacobson, Good Samaritan Hospital's vice president for medical
affairs, said in a statement Tuesday: "Our health system does not
presently have a comprehensive policy regarding this topic but we are
considering developing a policy with our medical staff to address this
matter."
Jacobson said, "We respect the rights of our physicians to practice
medicine as they feel is morally and medically appropriate."
Jenny Murphy-Shifflet, executive director of the Sexual Assault
Resource and Counseling Center of Lebanon County, said she has been
trying for a year to get Good Samaritan Hospital to require its doctors
to write prescriptions for emergency contraceptives.
"No victim should have to run around town after an assault looking for
emergency contraceptives," Murphy-Shifflet said.
Most hospitals in central Pennsylvania provide emergency contraception
to rape victims, according to the American Civil Liberties Union of
Pennsylvania.
"We don't treat it any different than any other legal prescription
medication," said Dr. John Repke, chairman of obstetrics and gynecology
at the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center in Hershey.
But Dr. Joe Kearns, former medical director at Good Samaritan, said the
hospital doesn't have a policy for or against prescribing morning-after
pills for the same reason it doesn't perform abortions.
"I'll tell you why we don't do abortions. Because there'd be such a
hullabaloo and disruption in this very Mennonite and very
fundamentalist community that there would be so much downside to this
in terms of people not wanting to come to this hospital, even though
it's their local hospital," Kearns said. "It's just not worth doing
it."
Danielle Sunday, a spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Coalition Against
Rape, said that if an attending physician is uncomfortable dispensing
the medication, he or she could call in someone else. "Obviously, in
incidents like this, we want all victims to have access to
comprehensive health care after an emergency," Sunday said.
A bill known as the Compassionate Assistance for Rape Emergencies Act
has been proposed in the Pennsylvania Legislature. It would ensure
comprehensive medical care, including the option of emergency
contraception, for all rape victims.
The woman who reported the rape was emotionally unable to speak to a
reporter, her father said.
The father said the woman was lying on the grass in her front yard in
Richland, Pa., at about 2 a.m. Friday morning when a man stopped to ask
directions. She told her father that the man punched her, knocking her
unconscious, then raped her while wearing a condom.
The victim waited until later that day to tell her mother about the
rape. The mother and daughter drove to Good Samaritan Hospital for
treatment but did not ask Gish for the morning-after drug until
Saturday, after talking with family members.
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
.
|
|
| User: "Shawn Hirn" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
01 Aug 2006 11:15:58 AM |
|
|
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
01 Aug 2006 11:56:03 AM |
|
|
In article <srhi-7C6B5B.12155801082006@news.giganews.com>,
Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net> wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
i believe his license to practice should be suspended, or at least
limited.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
01 Aug 2006 08:42:24 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
i believe his license to practice should be suspended, or at least limited.
If a patient is suffering from an emergency medical condition, the
attending doctor has the duty to follow the science, not his religious
beliefs. That's what any rational person does when the chips are down.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
01 Aug 2006 10:00:56 PM |
|
|
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in
news:1154482944.191467.97590@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women
as nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no
business practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have
gone into another area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or
pediatrics, not ER care.
i believe his license to practice should be suspended, or at least
limited.
If a patient is suffering from an emergency medical condition, the
attending doctor has the duty to follow the science, not his religious
beliefs. That's what any rational person does when the chips are
down.
The keyword here is "rational". Anti-choice loons are not rational.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
02 Aug 2006 07:11:37 AM |
|
|
In article <1154482944.191467.97590@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
i believe his license to practice should be suspended, or at least limited.
If a patient is suffering from an emergency medical condition, the
attending doctor has the duty to follow the science, not his religious
beliefs. That's what any rational person does when the chips are down.
there is conclusive proof that some attending physicians are harming
their patients by following their religious beliefs rather than
medical science.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
05 Aug 2006 05:33:29 AM |
|
|
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
05 Aug 2006 01:35:34 PM |
|
|
<coaster345@yahoo.com> wrote:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
STUDY REPORTS RISE IN CHILDBIRTH DEATHS
San Jose Mercury News (SJ) - Tuesday, June 11, 1996
By: New York Times
UNITED NATIONS In the first comprehensive survey in a decade to look at
maternal deaths worldwide, UNICEF reported Monday that about 585,000 women die
each year during pregnancy and childbirth, many needlessly.
Millions more, perhaps as many as 18 million women, suffer debilitating
illnesses or injuries that often disable them.
The figures are nearly one-fifth higher than previous estimates of about
500,000 deaths, according to the report by UNICEF, the United Nations Childrens
Fund, which compiled the new data with the World Health Organization and Johns
Hopkins University.
Much of the tragedy is preventable, the study says.
"For the most part, these are the deaths not of the ill, or the very old,
or the very young, but of healthy women in the prime of their lives," says the
report, the Progress of Nations 1996.
Data from the report indicate that one in 13 women in sub-Saharan Africa
and one in 35 in South Asia dies of causes related to pregnancy and childbirth,
according to UNICEF officials, compared with one in 3,200 in Europe, one in
3,300 in the United States, and one in 7,300 in Canada.
The survey faults the shortage of obstetric care in many nations. It calls
for the proper medical training of more midwives who would be better qualified
than traditional birth attendants to assist mothers before, during and after
delivery.
About 75,000 women die annually of botched abortions and another 75,000 of
brain and kidney damage in eclampsia, a disorder that can cause high blood
pressure and convulsions late in pregnancy. At least 100,000 die of blood
poisoning and 40,000 of obstructed labor.
The report on maternal risks, prepared under UNICEF's director, Carol
Bellamy, a former New York City Council president and director of the Peace
Corps who took over the agency last year, is notably stronger in its language
and imagery than many U.N. publications.
The new figures produced in the UNICEF report raised some questions among
experts, who say that getting accurate information on maternal mortality is
notoriously difficult. At Harvard University, Lincoln Chen, professor of
international health and head of the Center for Population and Development
Studies, said that the difference between 500,000 maternal deaths, the
previously accepted figure, and 585,000 or 600,000 may fall within a margin of
error, since all such numbers were "insecure."
More information at http://www.unicef.org/pon96/contents.htm
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
05 Aug 2006 10:48:23 AM |
|
|
writes:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
Too bad that in seventeen years of reading these two newsgroups, I've seen one
(1) person who could be justifiably described as pro-abortion. You're just
another weak-brainer who labels pro-choicers with it, and ignoring the fact
that pro-choicers are parents and grandparents. (That'll preclude you from
getting near my gallery pages, with those inconvenient pictures...)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
10 Aug 2006 08:27:29 AM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
coaster345@yahoo.com writes:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
Too bad that in seventeen years of reading these two newsgroups, I've seen one
(1) person who could be justifiably described as pro-abortion.
Who?
You're just
another weak-brainer who labels pro-choicers with it, and ignoring the fact
that pro-choicers are parents and grandparents. (That'll preclude you from
getting near my gallery pages, with those inconvenient pictures...)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
10 Aug 2006 08:59:49 AM |
|
|
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
coaster345@yahoo.com writes:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
Too bad that in seventeen years of reading these two newsgroups, I've seen
one (1) person who could be justifiably described as pro-abortion.
Who?
I'll e-mail you that one...it was back when I was a newcomer to Usenet (in
other words, a month or two before you were sixteen).
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
10 Aug 2006 10:00:51 AM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
coaster345@yahoo.com writes:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
Too bad that in seventeen years of reading these two newsgroups, I've seen
one (1) person who could be justifiably described as pro-abortion.
Who?
I'll e-mail you that one...
Thanks. I'll look for it.
it was back when I was a newcomer to Usenet (in
other words, a month or two before you were sixteen).
I was a budding annoyer, at that age.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
10 Aug 2006 06:46:12 PM |
|
|
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
coaster345@yahoo.com writes:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no
business practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone
into another area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics,
not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
Too bad that in seventeen years of reading these two newsgroups, I've
seen one (1) person who could be justifiably described as pro-abortion.
Who?
I'll e-mail you that one...
Thanks. I'll look for it.
It'll be on the way shortly.
it was back when I was a newcomer to Usenet (in
other words, a month or two before you were sixteen).
I was a budding annoyer, at that age.
Little did an unsuspecting planet know...;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
11 Aug 2006 06:55:29 AM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
coaster345@yahoo.com writes:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no
business practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone
into another area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics,
not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
Too bad that in seventeen years of reading these two newsgroups, I've
seen one (1) person who could be justifiably described as pro-abortion.
Who?
I'll e-mail you that one...
Thanks. I'll look for it.
It'll be on the way shortly.
Groovey.
it was back when I was a newcomer to Usenet (in
other words, a month or two before you were sixteen).
I was a budding annoyer, at that age.
Little did an unsuspecting planet know...;-)
Yes...and now I have two little budding annoyers of my own. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
11 Aug 2006 09:30:53 AM |
|
|
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
coaster345@yahoo.com writes:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women
as nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no
business practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have
gone into another area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or
pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
Too bad that in seventeen years of reading these two newsgroups, I've
seen one (1) person who could be justifiably described as
pro-abortion.
Who?
I'll e-mail you that one...
Thanks. I'll look for it.
It'll be on the way shortly.
Groovey.
Right on. ;-)
it was back when I was a newcomer to Usenet (in
other words, a month or two before you were sixteen).
I was a budding annoyer, at that age.
Little did an unsuspecting planet know...;-)
Yes...and now I have two little budding annoyers of my own. ;-)
....while Dale and I are grandparents to three.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "robpar" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
10 Aug 2006 12:49:41 PM |
|
|
On 10 Aug 2006 06:27:29 -0700, "Anamika"
<starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
coaster345@yahoo.com writes:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
Too bad that in seventeen years of reading these two newsgroups,
I've seen one (1) person who could be justifiably described
as pro-abortion.
Butting in;
My Grandmother who was pro-choice long before Roe V. Wade
worked as visiting nurse who checked on the welfare of poor
children. Her opinion any woman that was to poor to have and
raise a child should be forced to either give the child up
for adoption, or be aborted. She also supported free condoms
for poor families, and most of her pay was spent on condoms
that she gave to poor women. Each morning when she left she
loaded her car with food, diapers, soap, tooth paste, tooth
brushes anything she could buy, beg or steal to help the
poor children.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Shawn Hirn" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
09 Aug 2006 03:32:31 PM |
|
|
In article <1154774009.532766.293340@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
Incorrect.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "robpar" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
05 Aug 2006 09:57:15 AM |
|
|
On 5 Aug 2006 03:33:29 -0700, wrote:
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Exactly, and that doctor who denied the woman's request had no business
practicing emergency medicine. That doctor should have gone into another
area of medicine such as cosmetic surgery or pediatrics, not ER care.
Pro-abortion fanatics believe that pregnancy is a medical disorder to
be 'treated' by a pill.
And a unwanted pregnancy, is just that a medical disorder
that needs to be treated.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
17 Sep 2006 05:45:38 PM |
|
|
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Let's get our talking points straight, folks, we all need to be singing
from the same hymnal!
--
robert caponi | I'm the banana boy
MAIL mailto:tagutcow@earthlink.net | I'M FIERCE!
DUMB http://www.myspace.com/tagutcow | I'm the banana boy
SMRT http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow/ | WOOooOOoooO!
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
06 Nov 2006 07:14:01 PM |
|
|
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Let's get our talking points straight, folks, we all need to be singing
from the same hymnal!
i'm not at all surprised that you had no argument robert.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
07 Nov 2006 11:59:23 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:14:01 -0500, "james g. keegan jr."
<jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Let's get our talking points straight, folks, we all need to be singing
from the same hymnal!
i'm not at all surprised that you had no argument robert.
I am not surprised that you didn't understand who wrote what.
None of this is mine. BTW James, proper names are capitalized.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jon Stoll" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
07 Nov 2006 12:09:52 PM |
|
|
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:f4i1l25s4dmlgbb2gc8b5bcll7aotfnvqv@4ax.com...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:14:01 -0500, "james g. keegan jr."
<jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Let's get our talking points straight, folks, we all need to be singing
from the same hymnal!
i'm not at all surprised that you had no argument robert.
I am not surprised that you didn't understand who wrote what.
None of this is mine. BTW James, proper names are capitalized.
But..but.. your name isn't proper, robert. If your name were *****, then
it would be proper.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
08 Nov 2006 12:09:00 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:09:52 GMT, "Jon Stoll" <jstoll1@wi.rr.com>
wrote:
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:f4i1l25s4dmlgbb2gc8b5bcll7aotfnvqv@4ax.com...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:14:01 -0500, "james g. keegan jr."
<jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Let's get our talking points straight, folks, we all need to be singing
from the same hymnal!
i'm not at all surprised that you had no argument robert.
I am not surprised that you didn't understand who wrote what.
None of this is mine. BTW James, proper names are capitalized.
But..but.. your name isn't proper, robert. If your name were *****, then
it would be proper.
So is your name Jon or James? Or you just a brainless puppet? Don't
forget ***** holes serve a useful purpose, unlike the Pro-liars, that
waste air.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
09 Nov 2006 05:12:55 PM |
|
|
In article <f4i1l25s4dmlgbb2gc8b5bcll7aotfnvqv@4ax.com>,
Robert <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote:
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:14:01 -0500, "james g. keegan jr."
<jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Let's get our talking points straight, folks, we all need to be singing
from the same hymnal!
i'm not at all surprised that you had no argument robert.
I am not surprised that you didn't understand who wrote what.
None of this is mine. BTW James, proper names are capitalized.
what in heaven's name made you think i was referring to you, robert?
your world view seems to be far more limited than i had previously
thought.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
17 Sep 2006 06:07:48 PM |
|
|
In article <tagutcow-EDC475.18453717092006@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses <tagutcow@earthlink.net> wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Let's get our talking points straight, folks, we all need to be singing
from the same hymnal!
i see you were stung by my comment, robert. that is fine.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
17 Sep 2006 06:49:44 PM |
|
|
In article <jgkeegan-737C16.19074817092006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <tagutcow-EDC475.18453717092006@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses <tagutcow@earthlink.net> wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Let's get our talking points straight, folks, we all need to be singing
from the same hymnal!
i see you were stung by my comment, robert. that is fine.
Why do you keep calling me by my first name. Are you gay for me?
--
robert caponi | I'm the banana boy
MAIL mailto:tagutcow@earthlink.net | I'M FIERCE!
DUMB http://www.myspace.com/tagutcow | I'm the banana boy
SMRT http://home.earthlink.net/~tagutcow/ | WOOooOOoooO!
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
17 Sep 2006 06:57:08 PM |
|
|
In article <tagutcow-A0BEDD.19494417092006@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses <tagutcow@earthlink.net> wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-737C16.19074817092006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <tagutcow-EDC475.18453717092006@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Catalogue-book of Uncleannesses <tagutcow@earthlink.net> wrote:
In article <jgkeegan-616518.08450401082006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Let's get our talking points straight, folks, we all need to be singing
from the same hymnal!
i see you were stung by my comment, robert. that is fine.
Why do you keep calling me by my first name. Are you gay for me?
interesting that you suspect that anyone who calls you by your first
name is gay? did you develop that type of paranoia at home with your
relatives, or perhaps in your school?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
05 Aug 2006 05:32:36 AM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Wrong dipshit, they think abortion is homicide.
Oh and most anti-choicers are women.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anamika" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
11 Aug 2006 06:58:29 AM |
|
|
wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Wrong dipshit, they think abortion is homicide.
It's a convenient stance to have when you want control the lives of a
specific group of people.
Oh and most anti-choicers are women.
Not so.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
05 Aug 2006 07:30:39 AM |
|
|
In article <1154773956.930279.239300@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Wrong dipshit, they think abortion is homicide.
no, there aren't that many illiterate people
Oh and most anti-choicers are women.
wrong again, they're men trying to control women.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "robpar" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-choicers stamp their feet in frustration |
05 Aug 2006 09:55:23 AM |
|
|
On 5 Aug 2006 03:32:36 -0700, wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
remember ... those who oppose reproductive choice think of women as
nothing more than breeding stock.
Wrong dipshit, they think abortion is homicide.
Oh and most anti-choicers are women.
Oh really, and just how was that conclusion reached? Or is
it another of the pro-control lies?
Advocates of slavery were fond of saying most slaves told
them they were happy to be slaves.
It's far easier to go along, to get along with abusers. And
most abusive husband/fathers are devout religious men.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|