| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"The Revvrdd" |
| Date: |
25 Jan 2007 11:21:58 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:59:40 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"B'inyamin Cramer" <notayidinsight@noyidshere.cam> wrote in message
news:daqdnRgmycxtpCTYnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@giganews.com...
<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message news:0n9uh.1313$FN1.678@trnddc08...
On 25-Jan-2007, 10x@teluös.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:26 GMT, "Stan" <ecreipt@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
"Roedy Green" <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:lktfr2l0cv8g246nl676jmn5mf27d49ouh@4ax.com...
(snipped)
In Israel there are lockdowns one day in three. There are
checkpoints, sometimes as many as 8 in a block where Palestinians
have
to show papers to Israeli guards just to visit a friend. There is no
education at all for Palestinians.
You mean...Palestinians can be educated?
The Israelis use several methods. Tear gas, rubber bullets, aerial
bombs, etc...
You forgot financial funding, and the bigot to whom Stan was responding
frgot the fact that the so-called Palestinians refuse to go to Israeli
schools;
most likely because Israelis don't use textbooks where elementary math
problems are couched in terms of "dead jews."
What the ***** are you blathering about, you dyslexic, thick Irish *****?
That is a complete bollocks of a statement, which makes absofuckinglutely
no sense whatsoever.
Kind of like your fantasy tales of travelling to the middle east, eh Benji?
Kind of like your fantasy tales about buying "Girls", shitstain?
.
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
26 Jan 2007 02:21:41 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:48:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@englikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b98fcc.696241@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:59:40 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"B'inyamin Cramer" <notayidinsight@noyidshere.cam> wrote in message
news:daqdnRgmycxtpCTYnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@giganews.com...
<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:0n9uh.1313$FN1.678@trnddc08...
On 25-Jan-2007, 10x@teluös.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:26 GMT, "Stan" <ecreipt@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
"Roedy Green" <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:lktfr2l0cv8g246nl676jmn5mf27d49ouh@4ax.com...
(snipped)
In Israel there are lockdowns one day in three. There are
checkpoints, sometimes as many as 8 in a block where Palestinians
have
to show papers to Israeli guards just to visit a friend. There is
no
education at all for Palestinians.
You mean...Palestinians can be educated?
The Israelis use several methods. Tear gas, rubber bullets, aerial
bombs, etc...
You forgot financial funding, and the bigot to whom Stan was responding
frgot the fact that the so-called Palestinians refuse to go to Israeli
schools;
most likely because Israelis don't use textbooks where elementary math
problems are couched in terms of "dead jews."
What the ***** are you blathering about, you dyslexic, thick Irish *****?
That is a complete bollocks of a statement, which makes
absofuckinglutely
no sense whatsoever.
Kind of like your fantasy tales of travelling to the middle east, eh
Benji?
Kind of like your fantasy tales about buying "Girls", shitstain?
Which ones would they be, liberace? Oh that's right, the ones you've never
been able to find :)
The ones you wrote about, shitstain. In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
26 Jan 2007 04:36:47 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:34:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9b9d9.11460899@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:48:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@englikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b98fcc.696241@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:59:40 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"B'inyamin Cramer" <notayidinsight@noyidshere.cam> wrote in message
news:daqdnRgmycxtpCTYnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@giganews.com...
<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:0n9uh.1313$FN1.678@trnddc08...
On 25-Jan-2007, 10x@teluös.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:26 GMT, "Stan" <ecreipt@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
"Roedy Green" <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:lktfr2l0cv8g246nl676jmn5mf27d49ouh@4ax.com...
(snipped)
In Israel there are lockdowns one day in three. There are
checkpoints, sometimes as many as 8 in a block where Palestinians
have
to show papers to Israeli guards just to visit a friend. There is
no
education at all for Palestinians.
You mean...Palestinians can be educated?
The Israelis use several methods. Tear gas, rubber bullets, aerial
bombs, etc...
You forgot financial funding, and the bigot to whom Stan was
responding
frgot the fact that the so-called Palestinians refuse to go to
Israeli
schools;
most likely because Israelis don't use textbooks where elementary
math
problems are couched in terms of "dead jews."
What the ***** are you blathering about, you dyslexic, thick Irish
*****?
That is a complete bollocks of a statement, which makes
absofuckinglutely
no sense whatsoever.
Kind of like your fantasy tales of travelling to the middle east, eh
Benji?
Kind of like your fantasy tales about buying "Girls", shitstain?
Which ones would they be, liberace? Oh that's right, the ones you've never
been able to find :)
The ones you wrote about, shitstain.
Which ones?
The ones referred to in your posts.
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
26 Jan 2007 09:45:58 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:45:21 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9d965.19537253@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:34:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9b9d9.11460899@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:48:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@englikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b98fcc.696241@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:59:40 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"B'inyamin Cramer" <notayidinsight@noyidshere.cam> wrote in message
news:daqdnRgmycxtpCTYnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@giganews.com...
<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:0n9uh.1313$FN1.678@trnddc08...
On 25-Jan-2007, 10x@teluös.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:26 GMT, "Stan" <ecreipt@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
"Roedy Green" <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:lktfr2l0cv8g246nl676jmn5mf27d49ouh@4ax.com...
(snipped)
In Israel there are lockdowns one day in three. There are
checkpoints, sometimes as many as 8 in a block where
Palestinians
have
to show papers to Israeli guards just to visit a friend. There
is
no
education at all for Palestinians.
You mean...Palestinians can be educated?
The Israelis use several methods. Tear gas, rubber bullets,
aerial
bombs, etc...
You forgot financial funding, and the bigot to whom Stan was
responding
frgot the fact that the so-called Palestinians refuse to go to
Israeli
schools;
most likely because Israelis don't use textbooks where elementary
math
problems are couched in terms of "dead jews."
What the ***** are you blathering about, you dyslexic, thick Irish
*****?
That is a complete bollocks of a statement, which makes
absofuckinglutely
no sense whatsoever.
Kind of like your fantasy tales of travelling to the middle east, eh
Benji?
Kind of like your fantasy tales about buying "Girls", shitstain?
Which ones would they be, liberace? Oh that's right, the ones you've
never
been able to find :)
The ones you wrote about, shitstain.
Which ones?
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence :-----------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
26 Jan 2007 10:22:49 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:56:52 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45ba215b.622384@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:45:21 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9d965.19537253@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:34:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9b9d9.11460899@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:48:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@englikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b98fcc.696241@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:59:40 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com>
wrote:
"B'inyamin Cramer" <notayidinsight@noyidshere.cam> wrote in message
news:daqdnRgmycxtpCTYnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@giganews.com...
<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:0n9uh.1313$FN1.678@trnddc08...
On 25-Jan-2007, 10x@teluös.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:26 GMT, "Stan"
<ecreipt@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
"Roedy Green" <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote in
message
news:lktfr2l0cv8g246nl676jmn5mf27d49ouh@4ax.com...
(snipped)
In Israel there are lockdowns one day in three. There are
checkpoints, sometimes as many as 8 in a block where
Palestinians
have
to show papers to Israeli guards just to visit a friend.
There
is
no
education at all for Palestinians.
You mean...Palestinians can be educated?
The Israelis use several methods. Tear gas, rubber bullets,
aerial
bombs, etc...
You forgot financial funding, and the bigot to whom Stan was
responding
frgot the fact that the so-called Palestinians refuse to go to
Israeli
schools;
most likely because Israelis don't use textbooks where elementary
math
problems are couched in terms of "dead jews."
What the ***** are you blathering about, you dyslexic, thick Irish
*****?
That is a complete bollocks of a statement, which makes
absofuckinglutely
no sense whatsoever.
Kind of like your fantasy tales of travelling to the middle east, eh
Benji?
Kind of like your fantasy tales about buying "Girls", shitstain?
Which ones would they be, liberace? Oh that's right, the ones you've
never
been able to find :)
The ones you wrote about, shitstain.
Which ones?
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
How come you can't find them then?
I'm not looking for them!
How come you won't retrieve them?
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't find them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't retrieve
them!
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence :-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
26 Jan 2007 11:24:03 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:57:52 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45ba2ac0.3027613@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:56:52 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45ba215b.622384@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:45:21 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9d965.19537253@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:34:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9b9d9.11460899@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:48:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@englikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b98fcc.696241@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:59:40 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com>
wrote:
"B'inyamin Cramer" <notayidinsight@noyidshere.cam> wrote in
message
news:daqdnRgmycxtpCTYnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@giganews.com...
<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:0n9uh.1313$FN1.678@trnddc08...
On 25-Jan-2007, 10x@teluös.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:26 GMT, "Stan"
<ecreipt@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
"Roedy Green" <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote in
message
news:lktfr2l0cv8g246nl676jmn5mf27d49ouh@4ax.com...
(snipped)
In Israel there are lockdowns one day in three. There are
checkpoints, sometimes as many as 8 in a block where
Palestinians
have
to show papers to Israeli guards just to visit a friend.
There
is
no
education at all for Palestinians.
You mean...Palestinians can be educated?
The Israelis use several methods. Tear gas, rubber bullets,
aerial
bombs, etc...
You forgot financial funding, and the bigot to whom Stan was
responding
frgot the fact that the so-called Palestinians refuse to go to
Israeli
schools;
most likely because Israelis don't use textbooks where
elementary
math
problems are couched in terms of "dead jews."
What the ***** are you blathering about, you dyslexic, thick
Irish
*****?
That is a complete bollocks of a statement, which makes
absofuckinglutely
no sense whatsoever.
Kind of like your fantasy tales of travelling to the middle east,
eh
Benji?
Kind of like your fantasy tales about buying "Girls", shitstain?
Which ones would they be, liberace? Oh that's right, the ones you've
never
been able to find :)
The ones you wrote about, shitstain.
Which ones?
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
How come you can't find them then?
I'm not looking for them!
Because you know you wouldn't find them
They're in there and you know it! That's why you won't retrieve
them!
How come you won't retrieve them?
Because they don't exist.
Because you're embarrassed by the content!
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't find them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence :-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
27 Jan 2007 12:10:54 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:31:09 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bae1da.1927080@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:57:52 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45ba2ac0.3027613@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:56:52 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45ba215b.622384@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:45:21 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9d965.19537253@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:34:05 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9b9d9.11460899@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:48:05 +1100, "Tex"
<tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@englikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b98fcc.696241@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:59:40 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com>
wrote:
"B'inyamin Cramer" <notayidinsight@noyidshere.cam> wrote in
message
news:daqdnRgmycxtpCTYnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@giganews.com...
<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:0n9uh.1313$FN1.678@trnddc08...
On 25-Jan-2007, 10x@teluös.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:26 GMT, "Stan"
<ecreipt@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
"Roedy Green" <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote in
message
news:lktfr2l0cv8g246nl676jmn5mf27d49ouh@4ax.com...
(snipped)
In Israel there are lockdowns one day in three. There
are
checkpoints, sometimes as many as 8 in a block where
Palestinians
have
to show papers to Israeli guards just to visit a friend.
There
is
no
education at all for Palestinians.
You mean...Palestinians can be educated?
The Israelis use several methods. Tear gas, rubber bullets,
aerial
bombs, etc...
You forgot financial funding, and the bigot to whom Stan was
responding
frgot the fact that the so-called Palestinians refuse to go
to
Israeli
schools;
most likely because Israelis don't use textbooks where
elementary
math
problems are couched in terms of "dead jews."
What the ***** are you blathering about, you dyslexic, thick
Irish
*****?
That is a complete bollocks of a statement, which makes
absofuckinglutely
no sense whatsoever.
Kind of like your fantasy tales of travelling to the middle
east,
eh
Benji?
Kind of like your fantasy tales about buying "Girls", shitstain?
Which ones would they be, liberace? Oh that's right, the ones
you've
never
been able to find :)
The ones you wrote about, shitstain.
Which ones?
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
How come you can't find them then?
I'm not looking for them!
Because you know you wouldn't find them
They're in there and you know it! That's why you won't retrieve
them!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them. That's your job.
How come you won't retrieve them?
Because they don't exist.
Because you're embarrassed by the content!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them.
So why won't you retrieve them?
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't find them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Because you won't find them, liberace :)
Are you denying that you used the word "Girls" spelled with a capital
"g" in mid-sentence?
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence :-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
so why can't you find them, liberace? :)
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss. Now why won't you retrieve
them? :---------------------------------------------------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
27 Jan 2007 09:50:16 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:25:38 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45baec5e.4619462@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:31:09 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bae1da.1927080@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:57:52 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45ba2ac0.3027613@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:56:52 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45ba215b.622384@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:45:21 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9d965.19537253@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:34:05 +1100, "Tex"
<tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b9b9d9.11460899@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:48:05 +1100, "Tex"
<tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@englikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45b98fcc.696241@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:59:40 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com>
wrote:
"B'inyamin Cramer" <notayidinsight@noyidshere.cam> wrote in
message
news:daqdnRgmycxtpCTYnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@giganews.com...
<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:0n9uh.1313$FN1.678@trnddc08...
On 25-Jan-2007, 10x@teluös.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:26 GMT, "Stan"
<ecreipt@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
"Roedy Green" <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote in
message
news:lktfr2l0cv8g246nl676jmn5mf27d49ouh@4ax.com...
(snipped)
In Israel there are lockdowns one day in three. There
are
checkpoints, sometimes as many as 8 in a block where
Palestinians
have
to show papers to Israeli guards just to visit a
friend.
There
is
no
education at all for Palestinians.
You mean...Palestinians can be educated?
The Israelis use several methods. Tear gas, rubber
bullets,
aerial
bombs, etc...
You forgot financial funding, and the bigot to whom Stan
was
responding
frgot the fact that the so-called Palestinians refuse to go
to
Israeli
schools;
most likely because Israelis don't use textbooks where
elementary
math
problems are couched in terms of "dead jews."
What the ***** are you blathering about, you dyslexic, thick
Irish
*****?
That is a complete bollocks of a statement, which makes
absofuckinglutely
no sense whatsoever.
Kind of like your fantasy tales of travelling to the middle
east,
eh
Benji?
Kind of like your fantasy tales about buying "Girls",
shitstain?
Which ones would they be, liberace? Oh that's right, the ones
you've
never
been able to find :)
The ones you wrote about, shitstain.
Which ones?
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
How come you can't find them then?
I'm not looking for them!
Because you know you wouldn't find them
They're in there and you know it! That's why you won't retrieve
them!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them. That's your job.
So you want others to do what you are unable to do. No surprise there
You wrote it. You retrieve it.
How come you won't retrieve them?
Because they don't exist.
Because you're embarrassed by the content!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them.
So why won't you retrieve them?
Because they don't exist, as proven by the fact you've never found them :)
Of course they exist. They've been cited before!
:--------------------------)
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't find them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Because you won't find them, liberace :)
Are you denying that you used the word "Girls" spelled with a capital
"g" in mid-sentence?
Changing your claim now, eh liberace? :)
That's how you're going to find the post in question, *****! No
excuses left :--------------------)
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence
:-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
so why can't you find them, liberace? :)
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss.
Because you know you won't find them :)
And you know you will, which is why you're wriggling :-----)
Now why won't you retrieve
them? :---------------------------------------------------)
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you still can't find them
:)
They've been cited before, shiteforbrains. Memory failing you?
:----------------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
29 Jan 2007 12:50:13 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:32:38 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bc1c69.528760@news.onetel.net.uk...
<b'rissed>
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
How come you can't find them then?
I'm not looking for them!
Because you know you wouldn't find them
They're in there and you know it! That's why you won't retrieve
them!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them. That's your job.
So you want others to do what you are unable to do. No surprise there
You wrote it. You retrieve it.
So, you can't find it then :)
So you won't retrieve it, then :----------------)
How come you won't retrieve them?
Because they don't exist.
Because you're embarrassed by the content!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them.
So why won't you retrieve them?
Because they don't exist, as proven by the fact you've never found them :)
Of course they exist. They've been cited before!
:--------------------------)
No, you just keep refering to non-existent statements.
Look in the archives, idiot! You'll see they exist!
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't find them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't
retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Because you won't find them, liberace :)
Are you denying that you used the word "Girls" spelled with a capital
"g" in mid-sentence?
Changing your claim now, eh liberace? :)
That's how you're going to find the post in question, *****! No
excuses left :--------------------)
So, you still can't produce them. Why is that? No excuses left :)
So, you still won't retrieve them? Why is that? Too embarrassing?
:------------------------------)
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence
:-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
so why can't you find them, liberace? :)
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss.
Because you know you won't find them :)
And you know you will, which is why you're wriggling :-----)
You want others to find what you cannot, which is why you're wiggling :)
You want others to find what you refuse to, which is why you're
wriggling :---------------------------------------------)(
Now why won't you retrieve
them? :---------------------------------------------------)
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you still can't find them
:)
They've been cited before, shiteforbrains. Memory failing you?
:----------------)
Except you can't find them, shiteforbrains. Your eyes failing you? :)
Retrieve them and you'll see, tropischeisse. Your mouse failing you?
:-------------------------------------------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
29 Jan 2007 09:56:52 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:19:46 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <reegggie@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bd98fd.748456@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:32:38 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bc1c69.528760@news.onetel.net.uk...
<b'rissed>
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
How come you can't find them then?
I'm not looking for them!
Because you know you wouldn't find them
They're in there and you know it! That's why you won't retrieve
them!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them. That's your job.
So you want others to do what you are unable to do. No surprise there
You wrote it. You retrieve it.
So, you can't find it then :)
So you won't retrieve it, then :----------------)
You can't retrive a non-existent post, which is why you haven't retrieved it
:)
You won't retrieve an embarrassing post, which is why you haven't
retrieved it.
How come you won't retrieve them?
Because they don't exist.
Because you're embarrassed by the content!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them.
So why won't you retrieve them?
Because they don't exist, as proven by the fact you've never found them
:)
Of course they exist. They've been cited before!
:--------------------------)
No, you just keep refering to non-existent statements.
Look in the archives, idiot! You'll see they exist!
Then why can't you find them?
Then why won't you retrieve them?
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't find
them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't
retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Because you won't find them, liberace :)
Are you denying that you used the word "Girls" spelled with a capital
"g" in mid-sentence?
Changing your claim now, eh liberace? :)
That's how you're going to find the post in question, *****! No
excuses left :--------------------)
So, you still can't produce them. Why is that? No excuses left :)
So, you still won't retrieve them? Why is that? Too embarrassing?
:------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them? :------------------------)
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence
:-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
so why can't you find them, liberace? :)
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss.
Because you know you won't find them :)
And you know you will, which is why you're wriggling :-----)
You want others to find what you cannot, which is why you're wiggling :)
You want others to find what you refuse to, which is why you're
wriggling :---------------------------------------------)(
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic) sex with 8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to buying "Girls".
Too embarrassed?
"Haveing"???? LOL
Now why won't you retrieve
them? :---------------------------------------------------)
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you still can't find
them
:)
They've been cited before, shiteforbrains. Memory failing you?
:----------------)
Except you can't find them, shiteforbrains. Your eyes failing you? :)
Retrieve them and you'll see, tropischeisse. Your mouse failing you?
:-------------------------------------------)
Except you can't find them. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
Except you won't retrieve them. Mouse failing you, tropiwuss?
:----------------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
31 Jan 2007 09:26:49 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:08:02 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <reegggie@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bec11d.1554224@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:19:46 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <reegggie@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bd98fd.748456@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:32:38 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bc1c69.528760@news.onetel.net.uk...
<b'rissed>
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
How come you can't find them then?
I'm not looking for them!
Because you know you wouldn't find them
They're in there and you know it! That's why you won't retrieve
them!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them. That's your job.
So you want others to do what you are unable to do. No surprise there
You wrote it. You retrieve it.
So, you can't find it then :)
So you won't retrieve it, then :----------------)
You can't retrive a non-existent post, which is why you haven't retrieved
it
:)
You won't retrieve an embarrassing post, which is why you haven't
retrieved it.
You can't retrieve a non-existent post, which is why you haven't retrieved
it
You won't retrieve an embarrassing "email post", which is why you
haven't retrieved it.
How come you won't retrieve them?
Because they don't exist.
Because you're embarrassed by the content!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them.
So why won't you retrieve them?
Because they don't exist, as proven by the fact you've never found
them
:)
Of course they exist. They've been cited before!
:--------------------------)
No, you just keep refering to non-existent statements.
Look in the archives, idiot! You'll see they exist!
Then why can't you find them?
Then why won't you retrieve them?
Because they don't exist, which is why you've never been able to produce
them
No, because you're embarrassed by the content, which is why you refuse
to retrieve them.
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't find
them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't
retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Because you won't find them, liberace :)
Are you denying that you used the word "Girls" spelled with a
capital
"g" in mid-sentence?
Changing your claim now, eh liberace? :)
That's how you're going to find the post in question, *****! No
excuses left :--------------------)
So, you still can't produce them. Why is that? No excuses left :)
So, you still won't retrieve them? Why is that? Too embarrassing?
:------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them? :------------------------)
Because they don't exist, which is why you've never been able to produce
them :)
Because you find them too embarrassing, which is why you've always
refused to produce them :-----------------------------------)
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence
:-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
so why can't you find them, liberace? :)
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss.
Because you know you won't find them :)
And you know you will, which is why you're wriggling :-----)
You want others to find what you cannot, which is why you're wiggling :)
You want others to find what you refuse to, which is why you're
wriggling :---------------------------------------------)(
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic) sex
with 8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to buying "Girls".
Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic) sex with
8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
"Haveing"???? LOL
Just a typo.
Just a typo???
And this from an ***** who jumps on every typo he comes across!
:------------------------------------------------------------)
A small sin compared to your interest in little boys
You're projecting again. Which is why you brought up "little boys".
Do you buy them as well as "Girls"?
<snigger>
Now why won't you retrieve
them? :---------------------------------------------------)
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you still can't find
them
:)
They've been cited before, shiteforbrains. Memory failing you?
:----------------)
Except you can't find them, shiteforbrains. Your eyes failing you? :)
Retrieve them and you'll see, tropischeisse. Your mouse failing you?
:-------------------------------------------)
Except you can't find them. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
Except you won't retrieve them. Mouse failing you, tropiwuss?
:----------------)
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to having sex with 8y.o.
boys. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
You haven't retrieved the post where you admit to buying "Girls".
Mouse run away, tropiwuss? :---------------------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
02 Feb 2007 08:16:30 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:47:24 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <reegggie@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45c0b535.319309@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:08:02 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <reegggie@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bec11d.1554224@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:19:46 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <reegggie@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bd98fd.748456@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:32:38 +1100, "Tex" <tropicus@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegggie@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bc1c69.528760@news.onetel.net.uk...
<b'rissed>
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
How come you can't find them then?
I'm not looking for them!
Because you know you wouldn't find them
They're in there and you know it! That's why you won't
retrieve
them!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them. That's your job.
So you want others to do what you are unable to do. No surprise
there
You wrote it. You retrieve it.
So, you can't find it then :)
So you won't retrieve it, then :----------------)
You can't retrive a non-existent post, which is why you haven't
retrieved
it
:)
You won't retrieve an embarrassing post, which is why you haven't
retrieved it.
You can't retrieve a non-existent post, which is why you haven't retrieved
it
You won't retrieve an embarrassing "email post", which is why you
haven't retrieved it.
No such post exists, which is why you've never found it
Such an "email post" (snigger) does exist, which is why you won't
retrieve it!
How come you won't retrieve them?
Because they don't exist.
Because you're embarrassed by the content!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them.
So why won't you retrieve them?
Because they don't exist, as proven by the fact you've never found
them
:)
Of course they exist. They've been cited before!
:--------------------------)
No, you just keep refering to non-existent statements.
Look in the archives, idiot! You'll see they exist!
Then why can't you find them?
Then why won't you retrieve them?
Because they don't exist, which is why you've never been able to produce
them
No, because you're embarrassed by the content, which is why you refuse
to retrieve them.
So, how come you can't find them, liberace?
So how come you won't retrieve them, tropiwuss?
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't
find
them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't
retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Because you won't find them, liberace :)
Are you denying that you used the word "Girls" spelled with a
capital
"g" in mid-sentence?
Changing your claim now, eh liberace? :)
That's how you're going to find the post in question, *****! No
excuses left :--------------------)
So, you still can't produce them. Why is that? No excuses left :)
So, you still won't retrieve them? Why is that? Too embarrassing?
:------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them? :------------------------)
Because they don't exist, which is why you've never been able to produce
them :)
Because you find them too embarrassing, which is why you've always
refused to produce them :-----------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
:-----------------------------)
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence
:-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
so why can't you find them, liberace? :)
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss.
Because you know you won't find them :)
And you know you will, which is why you're wriggling :-----)
You want others to find what you cannot, which is why you're wiggling
:)
You want others to find what you refuse to, which is why you're
wriggling :---------------------------------------------)(
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic) sex
with 8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to buying "Girls".
Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic) sex
with
8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
"Haveing"???? LOL
Just a typo.
Just a typo???
And this from an ***** who jumps on every typo he comes across!
:------------------------------------------------------------)
No I don't, Liberace :)
Yes, you do, tropiwuss :-----------------------)
A small sin compared to your interest in little boys
You're projecting again. Which is why you brought up "little boys".
Do you buy them as well as "Girls"?
<snigger>
Don't project your own habits onto the rest of us, liberace :)
So why did you admit to buying "little boys", tropiwuss?
:----------------------------------)
Now why won't you retrieve
them? :---------------------------------------------------)
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you still can't
find
them
:)
They've been cited before, shiteforbrains. Memory failing you?
:----------------)
Except you can't find them, shiteforbrains. Your eyes failing you? :)
Retrieve them and you'll see, tropischeisse. Your mouse failing you?
:-------------------------------------------)
Except you can't find them. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
Except you won't retrieve them. Mouse failing you, tropiwuss?
:----------------)
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to having sex with
8y.o.
boys. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
You haven't retrieved the post where you admit to buying "Girls".
Mouse run away, tropiwuss? :---------------------)
You can't find any such post. Your mouse run away, Liberace? :)
You refuse to retrieve the post. Cat got your mouse, tropiwuss?
:---------------------------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
06 Feb 2007 10:57:20 PM |
|
|
On 5 Feb 2007 15:31:18 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 3, 1:16 am, (The Re'vvrdd) wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:47:24 +1100, "Tex" <tropi...@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <reegg...@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45c0b535.319309@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:08:02 +1100, "Tex" <tropi...@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <reegg...@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bec11d.1554224@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:19:46 +1100, "Tex" <tropi...@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <reegg...@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bd98fd.748456@news.onetel.net.uk...
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:32:38 +1100, "Tex" <tropi...@gmail.com> wrote:
"The Re'vvrdd" <raegg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
news:45bc1c69.528760@news.onetel.net.uk...
<b'rissed>
The ones referred to in your posts.
Where?
In the archive. Where else?
How come you can't find them then?
I'm not looking for them!
Because you know you wouldn't find them
They're in there and you know it! That's why you won't
retrieve
them!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them. That's your job.
So you want others to do what you are unable to do. No surprise
there
You wrote it. Youretrieve it.
So, you can't find it then :)
So you won'tretrieve it, then :----------------)
You can't retrive a non-existent post, which is why you haven't
retrieved
it
:)
You won't retrieve an embarrassing post, which is why you haven't
retrieved it.
You can't retrieve a non-existent post, which is why you haven't retrieved
it
You won't retrieve an embarrassing "email post", which is why you
haven't retrieved it.
No such post exists, which is why you've never found it
Such an "email post" (snigger) does exist, which is why you won'tretrieve it!
How come you won't retrieve them?
Because they don't exist.
Because you're embarrassed by the content!
So why can't you find them?
I'm not even looking for them.
So why won't you retrieve them?
Because they don't exist, as proven by the fact you've never found
them
:)
Of course they exist. They've been cited before!
:--------------------------)
No, you just keep refering to non-existent statements.
Look in the archives, idiot! You'll see they exist!
Then why can't you find them?
Then why won't you retrieve them?
Because they don't exist, which is why you've never been able to produce
them
No, because you're embarrassed by the content, which is why you refuse
to retrieve them.
So, how come you can't find them, liberace?
So how come you won't retrieve them, tropiwuss?
You avoided the question, liberace :)
No, you did, tropiwuss :--------------)
You are the one claiming such a post exists, yet you cannot produce
it. Why is that, liberace?
I have produced it before, tropiwuss. Why is it that you refuse to
produce it now?
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't
find
them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't
retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Because you won't find them, liberace :)
Are you denying that you used the word "Girls" spelled with a
capital
"g" in mid-sentence?
Changing your claim now, eh liberace? :)
That's how you're going to find the post in question, *****! No
excuses left :--------------------)
So, you still can't produce them. Why is that? No excuses left :)
So, you still won't retrieve them? Why is that? Too embarrassing?
:------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them? :------------------------)
Because they don't exist, which is why you've never been able to produce
them :)
Because you find them too embarrassing, which is why you've always
refused to produce them :-----------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
:-----------------------------)
So, is it "them" or "it". How many? Get your lies straight,
Liberace :)
You said "them", tropiwuss. You'll probably deny that too
:----------------------------------------------)
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence
:-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
so why can't you find them, liberace? :)
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss.
Because you know you won't find them :)
And you know you will, which is why you're wriggling :-----)
You want others to find what you cannot, which is why you're wiggling
:)
You want others to find what you refuse to, which is why you're
wriggling :---------------------------------------------)(
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic) sex
with 8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to buying "Girls".
Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic) sex
with
8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
"Haveing"???? LOL
Just a typo.
Just a typo???
And this from an ***** who jumps on every typo he comes across!
:------------------------------------------------------------)
No I don't, Liberace :)
Yes, you do, tropiwuss :-----------------------)
Where?
Here.
A small sin compared to your interest in little boys
You're projecting again. Which is why you brought up "little boys".
Do you buy them as well as "Girls"?
<snigger>
Don't project your own habits onto the rest of us, liberace :)
So why did you admit to buying "little boys", tropiwuss?
:----------------------------------)
You shouldn't buy little boys, Liberace :)
You shouldn't admit to doing so, tropiwuss :---------------)
Now why won't you retrieve
them? :---------------------------------------------------)
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you still can't
find
them
:)
They've been cited before, shiteforbrains. Memory failing you?
:----------------)
Except you can't find them, shiteforbrains. Your eyes failing you? :)
Retrieve them and you'll see, tropischeisse. Your mouse failing you?
:-------------------------------------------)
Except you can't find them. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
Except you won't retrieve them. Mouse failing you, tropiwuss?
:----------------)
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to having sex with
8y.o.
boys. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
You haven't retrieved the post where you admit to buying "Girls".
Mouse run away, tropiwuss? :---------------------)
You can't find any such post. Your mouse run away, Liberace? :)
You refuse to retrieve the post. Cat got your mouse, tropiwuss?
:---------------------------)
I thought it was multiple posts? Now it's "the post". Get your lies
straight, Liberace :)
You said "post", having previously said "them". Get your
distortions straight, tropiwuss :--------------------------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
07 Feb 2007 10:25:36 PM |
|
|
On 6 Feb 2007 21:18:17 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 7, 3:57 pm, (The Re"vvrdd) wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007 15:31:18 -0800, wrote:
<b'rissed>
So, how come you can't find them, liberace?
So how come you won't retrieve them, tropiwuss?
You avoided the question, liberace :)
No, you did, tropiwuss :--------------)
You're the only one claiming these non-existent "posts" exist
Liberace, yet you can never produce them :)
I've produced them before, triopiwuss. It's your turn. You're the
only one denying they exist :---------------)
You are the one claiming such a post exists, yet you cannot produce
it. Why is that, liberace?
I have produced it before, tropiwuss.
Where?
Here. On the screen.
Why is it that you refuse to
produce it now?
LOL. Back to "it" I see. What happened to "them"? You can't even
decide how many non-existent posts exist it seems :)
BWAHAHA. The constant switching between singular and plural is
yours, tropiwuss :----------------------------)
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you can't
find
them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you won't
retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Because you won't find them, liberace :)
Are you denying that you used the word "Girls" spelled with a
capital
"g" in mid-sentence?
Changing your claim now, eh liberace? :)
That's how you're going to find the post in question, *****! No
excuses left :--------------------)
So, you still can't produce them. Why is that? No excuses left :)
So, you still won't retrieve them? Why is that? Too embarrassing?
:------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them? :------------------------)
Because they don't exist, which is why you've never been able to produce
them :)
Because you find them too embarrassing, which is why you've always
refused to produce them :-----------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
:-----------------------------)
So, is it "them" or "it". How many? Get your lies straight,
Liberace :)
You said "them", tropiwuss. You'll probably deny that too
:----------------------------------------------)
I notice you didn't answer the question: how many? :)
I notice you didn't deny saying "them", tropiwuss. So how many (of
these allegedly non-existent "email posts" (sic)) were there?
:-----------------------)
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G' mid-sentence
:-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
so why can't you find them, liberace? :)
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss.
Because you know you won't find them :)
And you know you will, which is why you're wriggling :-----)
You want others to find what you cannot, which is why you're wiggling
:)
You want others to find what you refuse to, which is why you're
wriggling :---------------------------------------------)(
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic) sex
with 8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to buying "Girls".
Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic) sex
with
8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
"Haveing"???? LOL
Just a typo.
Just a typo???
And this from an ***** who jumps on every typo he comes across!
:------------------------------------------------------------)
No I don't, Liberace :)
Yes, you do, tropiwuss :-----------------------)
Where?
Here.
Your evasion is noted, Liberace :)
Your total incomprehension is noted, tropiwuss :--------------)
A small sin compared to your interest in little boys
You're projecting again. Which is why you brought up "little boys".
Do you buy them as well as "Girls"?
<snigger>
Don't project your own habits onto the rest of us, liberace :)
So why did you admit to buying "little boys", tropiwuss?
:----------------------------------)
You shouldn't buy little boys, Liberace :)
You shouldn't admit to doing so, tropiwuss :---------------)
Which is why I haven't :)
Of course you have :----------------------)
Now why won't you retrieve
them? :---------------------------------------------------)
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you still can't
find
them
:)
They've been cited before, shiteforbrains. Memory failing you?
:----------------)
Except you can't find them, shiteforbrains. Your eyes failing you? :)
Retrieve them and you'll see, tropischeisse. Your mouse failing you?
:-------------------------------------------)
Except you can't find them. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
Except you won't retrieve them. Mouse failing you, tropiwuss?
:----------------)
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to having sex with
8y.o.
boys. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
You haven't retrieved the post where you admit to buying "Girls".
Mouse run away, tropiwuss? :---------------------)
You can't find any such post. Your mouse run away, Liberace? :)
You refuse to retrieve the post. Cat got your mouse, tropiwuss?
:---------------------------)
I thought it was multiple posts? Now it's "the post". Get your lies
straight, Liberace :)
You said "post", having previously said "them". Get your
distortions straight, tropiwuss :--------------------------)
You're the only one claiming that such a post or posts exist,
liberace. How come you're not sure of the number, hmmmm? :)
You're the only one denying that such an "email post" or "email posts"
exist, tropiwuss. How come you can't decide if it's one or more?
:-----------------)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
10 Feb 2007 12:12:08 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:59:01 +1100, "Tex" <> wrote:
"The Re"vvrdd" <regggie@unglican.com.za> wrote in message
news:45caa4b8.1467279@news.onetel.net.uk...
On 6 Feb 2007 21:18:17 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 7, 3:57 pm, (The Re"vvrdd) wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007 15:31:18 -0800, wrote:
<b'rissed>
So, how come you can't find them, liberace?
So how come you won't retrieve them, tropiwuss?
You avoided the question, liberace :)
No, you did, tropiwuss :--------------)
You're the only one claiming these non-existent "posts" exist
Liberace, yet you can never produce them :)
I've produced them before, triopiwuss. It's your turn. You're the
only one denying they exist :---------------)
"Them"? I thought it was "the post". Make your mind up Liberace :)
"The (email) post"? I thought it was "them". Which is it according
to you, tropiwuss? :------------------------)
You are the one claiming such a post exists, yet you cannot produce
it. Why is that, liberace?
I have produced it before, tropiwuss.
Where?
Here. On the screen.
So why can't you find it on Google archives, liberace?
I'm not looking for it, tropiwuss!
So why do you refuse to do a Google search for it/them?
(BTW, have you found
out how many there were yet?)
First you decide it it's "this (email) post" or "these".
Why is it that you refuse to
produce it now?
LOL. Back to "it" I see. What happened to "them"? You can't even
decide how many non-existent posts exist it seems :)
BWAHAHA. The constant switching between singular and plural is
yours, tropiwuss :----------------------------)
Bwahahaha. Still trying to cover up being caught out I see.
No, that would be you. You're confused.
Why is that
Liberace? :) Maybe you can start calling a single post a "thread" again.
Hehehehe :)
Maybe you can resume calling Usenet posts "email posts".
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA :---------------------------------)
In the posts you're too
embarrassed to retrieve :----------)
Those posts which are too non-existent for you to
find :)
Those posts which are too embarrassing for you to
retrieve
:---------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you
can't
find
them
No, because they're too embarrassing, which is why you
won't
retrieve
them!
So how come you can't find them, liberace?
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss!
Because you won't find them, liberace :)
Are you denying that you used the word "Girls" spelled
with a
capital
"g" in mid-sentence?
Changing your claim now, eh liberace? :)
That's how you're going to find the post in question,
*****! No
excuses left :--------------------)
So, you still can't produce them. Why is that? No excuses left
:)
So, you still won't retrieve them? Why is that? Too
embarrassing?
:------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them? :------------------------)
Because they don't exist, which is why you've never been able to
produce
them :)
Because you find them too embarrassing, which is why you've always
refused to produce them :-----------------------------------)
So, why can't you find them, liberace? :)
So, why won't you retrieve them, tropiwuss?
:-----------------------------)
So, is it "them" or "it". How many? Get your lies straight,
Liberace :)
You said "them", tropiwuss. You'll probably deny that too
:----------------------------------------------)
I notice you didn't answer the question: how many? :)
I notice you didn't deny saying "them", tropiwuss. So how many (of
these allegedly non-existent "email posts" (sic)) were there?
:-----------------------)
You're the one claiming the existence of said post/s, yet you don't even
know how many there were :)
You're the one refusing to do a Google search on said "email post(s)".
Is that because you have no idea how many are involved?
Maybe you call call a single post a "thread" again Liberace :)
Maybe you can learn how to read, tropiwuss :--------------------)
Groups.google is your friend. Possibly your only
friend
Look for "Girls" spelled with a capital 'G'
mid-sentence
:-----------)
That obviously didn't work for you, liberace :)
It will work for you, tropiwuss. Give it a shot!
:-------------------------------------)
Nope, nothing. Looks like you were wrong, liberace :)
A lie. As can only be expected from a shabbos goy :---)
so why can't you find them, liberace? :)
I'm not even looking for them, tropiwuss.
Because you know you won't find them :)
And you know you will, which is why you're wriggling
:-----)
You want others to find what you cannot, which is why you're
wiggling
:)
You want others to find what you refuse to, which is why
you're
wriggling :---------------------------------------------)(
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing
(sic) sex
with 8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to buying
"Girls".
Too embarrassed?
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to haveing (sic)
sex
with
8y.o.
boys. Too embarrassed?
"Haveing"???? LOL
Just a typo.
Just a typo???
And this from an ***** who jumps on every typo he comes across!
:------------------------------------------------------------)
No I don't, Liberace :)
Yes, you do, tropiwuss :-----------------------)
Where?
Here.
Your evasion is noted, Liberace :)
Your total incomprehension is noted, tropiwuss :--------------)
Your inability to back up your claims with a Google search is noted,
Liberace :)
Your refusal to back up your claims with a retrieval of the relevant
"email post(s)" is noted, tropiwuss :--------------------)
Speaking of incomprehension, have you discovered the difference between a
"post" and a "thread" yet? Hehehehe
Speaking of same, do you even know the difference between a Usenet
post and an email? LOL
A small sin compared to your interest in little boys
You're projecting again. Which is why you brought up "little
boys".
Do you buy them as well as "Girls"?
<snigger>
Don't project your own habits onto the rest of us, liberace :)
So why did you admit to buying "little boys", tropiwuss?
:----------------------------------)
You shouldn't buy little boys, Liberace :)
You shouldn't admit to doing so, tropiwuss :---------------)
Which is why I haven't :)
Of course you have :----------------------)
Where?
Here.
Now why won't you retrieve
them?
:---------------------------------------------------)
Because they don't exist, liberace, which is why you still
can't
find
them
:)
They've been cited before, shiteforbrains. Memory failing
you?
:----------------)
Except you can't find them, shiteforbrains. Your eyes failing
you? :)
Retrieve them and you'll see, tropischeisse. Your mouse
failing you?
:-------------------------------------------)
Except you can't find them. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
Except you won't retrieve them. Mouse failing you, tropiwuss?
:----------------)
You haven't retrieved those posts where you admit to having sex
with
8y.o.
boys. Your mouse failing you, liberace? :)
You haven't retrieved the post where you admit to buying "Girls".
Mouse run away, tropiwuss? :---------------------)
You can't find any such post. Your mouse run away, Liberace? :)
You refuse to retrieve the post. Cat got your mouse, tropiwuss?
:---------------------------)
I thought it was multiple posts? Now it's "the post". Get your lies
straight, Liberace :)
You said "post", having previously said "them". Get your
distortions straight, tropiwuss :--------------------------)
You're the only one claiming that such a post or posts exist,
liberace. How come you're not sure of the number, hmmmm? :)
You're the only one denying that such an "email post" or "email posts"
exist, tropiwuss. How come you can't decide if it's one or more?
:-----------------)
Because you're the only one claiming it/they exist, Liberace.
You seem to be the only one denying it/they exist, tropiwuss.
Shouldn't you
be able to count them? Then again, as you don't know the difference between
a "post" and a "thread", counting may be a little beyond you :)
Could it be you're looking for "email posts" in an email archive
instead of groups.google?
<snigger>
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Revvrdd" |
|
| Title: Re: Apartheid, yes Apartheid |
10 Feb 2007 10:49:13 PM |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |