Science > Abortion > Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Flower Power" |
| Date: |
04 Jul 2004 10:05:04 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
"Steenkin Man" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2kra2hF5fprnU1@uni-berlin.de...
What are you relying on, arsehole?
==========================
Tell us how normal it is for boys and men to constantly fantasize and post
about making women suffer and murdering women. Inquiring minds want to
know. Tell us all the serial killers didn't have the same thoughts.....
I'd love to see what your defense of this sociopath will be when he finally
acts on his fantasies and murders a few women. Oh, wait - you'll claim the
"bitches" deserved it - right?
FP..........
.
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 06:38:55 PM |
|
|
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:pan.2004.07.09.20.24.50.111050@hotmail.com...
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 17:02:58 +0000, Harry
Ballsac..a. posted:
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:pan.2004.07.09.04.34.44.407685@hotmail.com...
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 +0000, Harry
Ballsac..a. posted:
1.) WHAT IS "DEFAMATION"?
Defamation, sometimes called "defamation of character", is spoken or
written words that falsely and negatively reflect on a living
person's
reputation.
Hey, nominated CotM:
Couldn't back up your claims, so up your sonny jim
First anwser the question: "How can a nym be degamted?".
And don't run cowardly away this time!
The only cowards are you clowns.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 07:36:57 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:38:55 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> got double
secret probation because:
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:pan.2004.07.09.20.24.50.111050@hotmail.com...
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 17:02:58 +0000, Harry
Ballsac..a. posted:
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:pan.2004.07.09.04.34.44.407685@hotmail.com...
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 +0000, Harry
Ballsac..a. posted:
1.) WHAT IS "DEFAMATION"?
Defamation, sometimes called "defamation of character", is spoken or
written words that falsely and negatively reflect on a living
person's
reputation.
Hey, nominated CotM:
Couldn't back up your claims, so up your sonny jim
First anwser the question: "How can a nym be degamted?".
And don't run cowardly away this time!
The only cowards are you clowns.
So how is the whole gay thing working out for you Harry?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 11:40:47 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> got double
secret probation because:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9520D4B3429F4mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
<SNIP socman SCREED>
Here I fixed it for you Harry
--------------------------------------------------------------------
THE WAY OF THE K00K
Never learn from your mistakes.
Always practice your mistakes; you may get them right.
Always pick on those smarter and tougher than you.
Always believe that only you know the TRVTH.
Never allow logic or reason get in the way of a good k00k.
When being overwhelmed by logic and reason: k00ksuit!
If you are going to be wrong, do it at the top of your lungs.
When caught in a lie: LIE!
When in doubt: Order the Crab Won Ton
Plagiarism is your friend. Use it.
Whenever contradicted; morph, start calling people names, and make
false accusations. Include the children of your target in your
allegations, even if they don't have any.
Post numerous blank posts, or posts containing only a message id.
Post numerous copy&paste web articles from crackerpot websites.
Never forget to call k00kologists "k00ks."
If there are several, call them "sockpuppets" too
Quote notorious scientists or writers - it makes it look as if they
approve the drivel you are writing!
Ignore all traffic signs and feel free to trespass, you don't have to
obey any rules.
Scare your enemies with lawsuits, police escorts and whines.
Always back up your empty (albeit noisy) threats with phony LARTs,
false police reports, and harassing letters to the FBI and other
gubbermint agencies.
Be vigilant in your redundancy. The more you repeat yourself, the more
likely others will believe you!
If you can't find anyone as crazy as yourself to support you in the
flamewars you start with the normal population, create sock puppets
and use anonymous remailers that shamelessly hang on every word you
write.
The more your fake personalities adulate you, the more respect you'll
get!
Always remain clueproof.
When responding to one line challenges, post paragraphs of rants and
screed in response.
Incoherency is not a roadblock to poasting.
Neither is illiteracy.
Delusions poasted often enough become fact.
Claim you will destroy <insert newsfroup> for attacking you.
When spnaked, send cmsg for Fanboi newsfroup(s).
Find your Lame, Use your Lame, Be your Lame!
Post Edit when the TRVTH hurts.
Always sneck the offending newsfroups.
Always poast pictures of yourself so you can be admired in all your
k00ky glory.
Always accuse others of the very acts you are guilty of.
Post lots of boasts about your high IQ and incredible talents.
Always <plonk> somebody just before replying the plonkee!
Write a self-published book and claim it a success. Bonus points for
comparing it to "Mein Kampf" and/or the Bible.
Declare yourself equal to a deity of your choice.
Claim that you've come from other planets.
Claim thousands of past lives.
Frothing complaints carry far more weight when you send them from
"legal@" some domain.
Nothing strikes terror into the hearts of your detractors more than
telling them that you're archiving their messages for possible use in
the future.
Never forget that everyone else posting to Usenet is a paid
disinformation agent looking to discredit you.
Usenet is governed by US law. If a poster in Romania killfiles you,
he's obviously violating your 1st Amendment rights and can be sued.
Every news admin in the world hangs out in NANAU, and they're just
dying to nuke the account of that meanyhead who just called you
"fucknozzle". Drop 'em a line - that's what they're there for, after
all.
AUK will be closed down. Just you wait and see.
They've nuked hundreds of accounts in the name of free speech and
*yours* will be next.
Abuse women while telling how many hundreds you've loved. Nevermind
that you're one ugly ***** and that there were 30,000 femininas
that thought you were a scumbag with bad teeth.
Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not
require proof.
Do not neglect to poast your responses to forums that the originator
doesn't read. This will make the people in that forum very impressed
with how you tear him to shreds without him being able to respond.
They like it even better if you are off-topic for that forum.
Keep in mind that lack of evidence supporting your konspiracy theory
actually _is_ evidence, of how effective the konspiracy is in hiding.
Any problems with your poasts are the fault of the konspirators, who
are trying to stop you from preventing the extinction of humanity.
Konspiracies that are able to subvert whole governments are always
unable to silence konspiracy ko0ks.
The entire United States government is willing to spend millions of
dollars for the sole purpose if harassing you.
Hollywood is making movies based on your personal life.
Do not consult psychiatrists or other mental health professionals.
They are part of the konspiracy, and will sedate you and lock you away
and keep you drugged if you tell them the truth.
Numerology and Astrology are respectable sciences and are useful for
proving your case.
Everyone is Tim Hill, or David Green, or...
There is a fine line between trolling and kookery. Find that line and
cross it repeatedly. When you are killfiled and/or LARTed for
net.abuse as a result, claim victory. If you lose multiple accounts,
this merely proves that you are indeed a world-class troll, with a
black-belt in manipulation.
If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed. If
they respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more
obsessed.
Publishing people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any
dignity is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet
information stores, and absolutely not to be fucked with.
Everyone is out to get you. You can put a stop to this by telling
everyone that they're out to get you at every available opportunity.
You are the only sane one.
Those that give you a hard time about morally bankrupt things you
yourself admit to are just persecutioners of the new inquisition.
Yelling in all caps and cursing at your detractors is debate. Your
detractors laughing at you with sarcastic remarks is obvious anger and
jealousy.
If doing something results in the loss of your account, legal hassles,
or blunt trauma injury, do it again. It always works better the second
time.
Asterisks, lots and lots of Asterisks.
Poking holes in kookscreed is stalking, and is a felony.
"They laughed at Einstein, too!"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter J Ross" |
|
| Title: Yet another socman plagiarises (was: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined) |
09 Jul 2004 12:05:47 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 GMT, Harry Ballsac..a. wrote:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9520D4B3429F4mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
General Libel and Slander Law Questions Just for you "stupid people" on
Slander and "DEFAMATION"
<snip>
<http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/libel_and_slander/>
It's interesting that you had to copy and paste from several different
pages at the site in order to plagiarise at such length.
Please choose one of the following standard whines as your reply:
1. I meant it as a joke!
2. Everything on the Internet is public domain!
3. I forgot to type the URL!
4. I wrote the article!
5. My Daddy wrote the article!
6. You're just a troll!
7. My ISP approves of plagiarism!
--
PJR :-)
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
The official soc.men FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
(Remove NOSPAM to reply.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet another socman plagiarises (was: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined) |
09 Jul 2004 12:11:30 PM |
|
|
"Peter J Ross" <gadfly@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote in message
news:cclcjr.3vvgua3.1@nntp.petitmorte.net...
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 GMT, Harry Ballsac..a. wrote:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9520D4B3429F4mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
General Libel and Slander Law Questions Just for you "stupid people" on
Slander and "DEFAMATION"
<snip>
<http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/libel_and_slander/>
It's interesting that you had to copy and paste from several different
pages at the site in order to plagiarise at such length.
And you think the text is not standard in any law book or what on the
internet, the problem with you Liberal socialist commie nuts is Peter (tin
foil cone wearing nut) is your an idiot, with no common sense on any
issue... Your posts in the past and future shows how fucking stupid you
really are. You Liberal Socialist are all the same, goat blowers... That's
why the federal Liberals of Canada and the Status of Women of Canada are
getting their stupidity sued for millions, based on Slander and for their
anti-male views... Just what did you Liberals socialist commies think you
were going to accomplish with your retarded stupidity anyhow. Did you think
people like me, would take your Liberal socialist government, and feminazi
pimps to task on their stupidity in the courts.....Try again Peter and this
time try not to look so anal.....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Agent Monarch" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet another socman plagiarises (was: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined) |
09 Jul 2004 10:22:20 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in message news:<6lAHc.6821$iw3.2818@clgrps13>...
"Peter J Ross" <gadfly@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote in message
news:cclcjr.3vvgua3.1@nntp.petitmorte.net...
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 GMT, Harry Ballsac..a. wrote:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9520D4B3429F4mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
General Libel and Slander Law Questions Just for you "stupid people" on
Slander and "DEFAMATION"
<snip>
<http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/libel_and_slander/>
It's interesting that you had to copy and paste from several different
pages at the site in order to plagiarise at such length.
And you think the text is not standard in any law book or what on the
internet, the problem with you Liberal socialist commie nuts is Peter (tin
foil cone wearing nut) is your an idiot, with no common sense on any
issue... Your posts in the past and future
"Future"? You can read into the future? ...Wow.
shows how fucking stupid you
really are. You Liberal Socialist are all the same, goat blowers... That's
why the federal Liberals of Canada and the Status of Women of Canada are
getting their stupidity sued for millions, based on Slander and for their
anti-male views... Just what did you Liberals socialist commies think you
were going to accomplish with your retarded stupidity anyhow. Did you think
people like me, would take your Liberal socialist government, and feminazi
pimps to task on their stupidity in the courts.....Try again Peter and this
time try not to look so anal.....
Just ... wow...
Where did you ever acquire your talent for eloquence, Harry?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter J Ross" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet another socman plagiarises |
09 Jul 2004 02:06:34 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 17:11:30 GMT, Harry Ballsac..a. wrote:
"Peter J Ross" <gadfly@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote in message
news:cclcjr.3vvgua3.1@nntp.petitmorte.net...
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 GMT, Harry Ballsac..a. wrote:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9520D4B3429F4mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my
words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r
b-o-y.
General Libel and Slander Law Questions Just for you "stupid
people" on Slander and "DEFAMATION"
<snip>
<http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/libel_and_slander/>
It's interesting that you had to copy and paste from several
different pages at the site in order to plagiarise at such length.
And you think the text is not standard in any law book or what on
the internet,
It appears on 1 (won) website, thief.
the problem with you Liberal socialist commie nuts
You misspelled "socilaist". Does it become difficult to maintain the
pose of illiteracy when you're angry and upset, thief?
is Peter (tin foil cone wearing nut) is your an idiot,
Apologies. You're maintaining the pose of illiteracy pretty well,
actually, thief.
with no common sense on any issue... Your posts in the past and
future shows how fucking stupid you really are.
Message-Ids, thief?
You Liberal Socialist are all the same, goat blowers...
No, it's petitmorters who are goat-blowers. I'll prove it by
crossposting to AHM, so TP can show you his X-Face, thief.
That's why the federal Liberals of Canada and the Status of Women of
Canada are getting their stupidity sued for millions, based on
Slander and for their anti-male views...
Why should I care what happens in the world's most boring former
colony, thief?
Just what did you Liberals socialist commies think you were going to
accomplish with your retarded stupidity anyhow. Did you think
people like me, would take your Liberal socialist government, and
feminazi pimps to task on their stupidity in the courts.....Try
again Peter and this time try not to look so anal.....
Admit that you're jealous of the attention conntard receives and are
trying to be even more bizarre than he is, thief.
Btw, have I mentioned that you're a THIEF, thief?
--
PJR :-)
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
The official soc.men FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
(Remove NOSPAM to reply.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 11:00:29 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:54:55 +0000, spooge posted:
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When <shush>
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
Does harry ballsac have no balls in his sack?
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "spooge" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 09:07:16 PM |
|
|
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:pan.2004.07.09.04.00.27.422880@hotmail.com:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:54:55 +0000, spooge
posted:
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When <shush>
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
Does harry ballsac have no balls in his sack?
Harry doesn't even have the sac.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 11:02:15 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:00:29 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:54:55 +0000, spooge posted:
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When <shush>
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
Does harry ballsac have no balls in his sack?
He seems to be avoiding me. I could not even get him to respond to his
CotM nomination.
Juvpu vf fgvyy njnvgvat n frpbaq
'Ratz
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 11:19:52 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:02:15 -0700, Aratzio
posted:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:00:29 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:54:55 +0000, spooge
posted:
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When <shush>
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
Does harry ballsac have no balls in his sack?
He seems to be avoiding me. I could not even get him to respond to his
CotM nomination.
Juvpu vf fgvyy njnvgvat n frpbaq
'Ratz
I second his nomination for Coward of the Month
First he threatens with a lawsuit but then he can't explain why a nym
can't be a victim of libel!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 11:25:20 PM |
|
|
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:pan.2004.07.09.04.19.48.942459@hotmail.com...
Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:02:15 -0700, Aratzio
posted:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:00:29 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:54:55 +0000, spooge
posted:
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When <shush>
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
Does harry ballsac have no balls in his sack?
He seems to be avoiding me. I could not even get him to respond to his
CotM nomination.
Juvpu vf fgvyy njnvgvat n frpbaq
'Ratz
I second his nomination for Coward of the Month
First he threatens with a lawsuit but then he can't explain why a nym
can't be a victim of libel!
Do you have problems undering your stupidity with your outbursts of
emotional whiny crying the blues, with no real substance
INSULTS
"WHAT ABOUT INSULTS AND EPITHETS? ARE THEY DEFAMATORY?"
Generally, no. Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no real
substance, except to show intense dislike. Oral
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "spooge" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 09:10:15 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:Q6pHc.11132$Rf.2435@edtnps84:
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:pan.2004.07.09.04.19.48.942459@hotmail.com...
Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:02:15 -0700, Aratzio
posted:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:00:29 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> got double secret
probation because:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:54:55 +0000, spooge
posted:
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote
in news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote
in news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When <shush>
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r
b-o-y.
Does harry ballsac have no balls in his sack?
He seems to be avoiding me. I could not even get him to respond to
his CotM nomination.
Juvpu vf fgvyy njnvgvat n frpbaq
'Ratz
I second his nomination for Coward of the Month
First he threatens with a lawsuit but then he can't explain why a nym
can't be a victim of libel!
Do you have problems undering your stupidity with your outbursts of
emotional whiny crying the blues, with no real substance
INSULTS
"WHAT ABOUT INSULTS AND EPITHETS? ARE THEY DEFAMATORY?"
Generally, no. Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no
real substance, except to show intense dislike. Oral
How about this then:
It is a fact that Harry Ballsac deflowers goats in the presence of minors.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 11:39:26 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:25:20 +0000, Harry
Ballsac..a. posted:
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:pan.2004.07.09.04.19.48.942459@hotmail.com...
Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:02:15 -0700, Aratzio
posted:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:00:29 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:54:55 +0000, spooge
posted:
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When <shush>
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r
b-o-y.
Does harry ballsac have no balls in his sack?
He seems to be avoiding me. I could not even get him to respond to his
CotM nomination.
Juvpu vf fgvyy njnvgvat n frpbaq
'Ratz
I second his nomination for Coward of the Month
First he threatens with a lawsuit but then he can't explain why a nym
can't be a victim of libel!
Do you have problems undering your stupidity with your outbursts of
emotional whiny crying the blues, with no real substance INSULTS
"WHAT ABOUT INSULTS AND EPITHETS? ARE THEY DEFAMATORY?" Generally, no.
Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no real substance,
except to show intense dislike. Oral
You misspelled "anal".
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net> CEO Alcatroll Labs
Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 11:37:03 PM |
|
|
In article <Q6pHc.11132$Rf.2435@edtnps84>, Harry Ballsac..a. <
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote:
I second his nomination for Coward of the Month
First he threatens with a lawsuit but then he can't explain why a nym
can't be a victim of libel!
Do you have problems undering your stupidity with your outbursts of
emotional whiny crying the blues, with no real substance
INSULTS
"WHAT ABOUT INSULTS AND EPITHETS? ARE THEY DEFAMATORY?"
Generally, no. Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no real
substance, except to show intense dislike. Oral
That's not why. And there is no "generally" about it.
To be defamatory a statement must hold the plaintiff up to scorn,
ridicule, or contempt. The law only protects "the memory of the dead,"
giving no cause of action to decedents.
In short, you can defame the dead all you like.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 12:02:57 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:080720042137030682%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <Q6pHc.11132$Rf.2435@edtnps84>, Harry Ballsac..a. <
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote:
I second his nomination for Coward of the Month
First he threatens with a lawsuit but then he can't explain why a nym
can't be a victim of libel!
Do you have problems undering your stupidity with your outbursts of
emotional whiny crying the blues, with no real substance
INSULTS
"WHAT ABOUT INSULTS AND EPITHETS? ARE THEY DEFAMATORY?"
Generally, no. Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no
real
substance, except to show intense dislike. Oral
That's not why. And there is no "generally" about it.
To be defamatory a statement must hold the plaintiff up to scorn,
ridicule, or contempt. The law only protects "the memory of the dead,"
giving no cause of action to decedents.
In short, you can defame the dead all you like.
You are an idiot, learn what the law is you goof.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 09:09:52 PM |
|
|
In article <5dAHc.6818$iw3.2198@clgrps13>, Harry Ballsac..a. <
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:080720042137030682%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <Q6pHc.11132$Rf.2435@edtnps84>, Harry Ballsac..a. <
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote:
I second his nomination for Coward of the Month
First he threatens with a lawsuit but then he can't explain why a nym
can't be a victim of libel!
Do you have problems undering your stupidity with your outbursts of
emotional whiny crying the blues, with no real substance
INSULTS
"WHAT ABOUT INSULTS AND EPITHETS? ARE THEY DEFAMATORY?"
Generally, no. Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no
real
substance, except to show intense dislike. Oral
That's not why. And there is no "generally" about it.
To be defamatory a statement must hold the plaintiff up to scorn,
ridicule, or contempt. The law only protects "the memory of the dead,"
giving no cause of action to decedents.
In short, you can defame the dead all you like.
You are an idiot, learn what the law is you goof.
Don't you look like a fool? Get an education. That is the law. You
needle dicks on the Right never let the truth get in the way of a good
lie, do you?
"No civil action will lie for the defamation of one who is dead, unless
there is a reflection upon those still living, who are themselves
defamed."
Kelly v. Johnson Publishing Co., 160 Cal. App. 2d 718
"Statutes in several states have made defamation of the dead a crime,
but they have been construed as intended only to protect the public
interest and the memory of the deceased, and so to afford no civil
action to the surviving relatives"
Lee v. Weston, 402 N.E.2d 23
"Once a person is dead, there is no extant reputation to be injured by
defamers or to be protected by the law."
Maurice v. Snell, 632 So. 2d 393
"On appeal, the relatives contend that in Oklahoma, libelous statements
about a dead person give rise to a cause of action in favor of the
decedent's relatives. The newspaper argues that no civil action exists
when a dead person is defamed, and that the petition therefore failed
to state a cause of action. Courts have held that defamation of the
dead, while perhaps constituting a criminal offense, has never given
rise to a cause of action in favor of relatives who were not personally
defamed. Plaintiffs in the instant case failed to allege that the
defamatory matter was spoken at them, therefore they failed to state a
cause of action."
Drake V. Park Newspapers Of Northeastern Oklahoma, Inc., 1984 OK 50
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sharon B" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
11 Jul 2004 07:42:04 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:25:20 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
<Q6pHc.11132$Rf.2435@edtnps84>:
Do you have problems undering your stupidity with your outbursts of
emotional whiny crying the blues, with no real substance
INSULTS
wot the HEYULL was that mess supposed to mean?
<thwacks kook parser on the end of the table repeatedly>
.
|
|
|
| User: "spooge" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
11 Jul 2004 08:30:38 PM |
|
|
Sharon B <queenbeeyotch@buggeroff.org> wrote in
news:7hn3f0dr85e1auc24st5urvk59ugped1lp@4ax.com:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:25:20 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
<Q6pHc.11132$Rf.2435@edtnps84>:
Do you have problems undering your stupidity with your outbursts of
emotional whiny crying the blues, with no real substance
INSULTS
wot the HEYULL was that mess supposed to mean?
<thwacks kook parser on the end of the table repeatedly>
I suspect you'd need to smack Harry's head on the end of your table several
hundred times before he'd make any sense of the english language.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter J Ross" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 12:42:47 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:19:52 +0200, Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:
Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:02:15 -0700, Aratzio
posted:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:00:29 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:54:55 +0000, spooge
posted:
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When <shush>
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
Does harry ballsac have no balls in his sack?
He seems to be avoiding me. I could not even get him to respond to his
CotM nomination.
Juvpu vf fgvyy njnvgvat n frpbaq
'Ratz
I second his nomination for Coward of the Month
Noted.
First he threatens with a lawsuit but then he can't explain why a nym
can't be a victim of libel!
He likes to morph after being spanked, too. That's what happened when
he was posting as "The Infamious Ardermis Gordon" and "In a Savage
Land of Socilaist Stupity".
--
PJR :-)
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
The official soc.men FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
(Remove NOSPAM to reply.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
06 Jul 2004 08:06:07 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 03:05:15 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob>
transparently proposed:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When you come into a lot of cash fish lips, call me and I'll sue you...
Until then go blow your pet doggy, he is waiting.
Gee Harry, I have plenty of money. Pick me or be branded a coward (as
usual).
'Ratz
--
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
06 Jul 2004 08:06:33 PM |
|
|
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:ls8le0pv1079nq0atfp43914j44t6h8idg@4ax.com...
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 03:05:15 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob>
transparently proposed:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When you come into a lot of cash fish lips, call me and I'll sue you...
Until then go blow your pet doggy, he is waiting.
Gee Harry, I have plenty of money.
pop bottles, and used coke cans don't count...
Pick me or be branded a coward (as
usual).
LOL's, the only cowards, I see are all you fat cows dancing naked in the
moonlight
'Ratz
--
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
.
|
|
|
| User: "spooge" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 10:59:35 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:t0IGc.311$Rf.243@edtnps84:
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:ls8le0pv1079nq0atfp43914j44t6h8idg@4ax.com.
[...]
Pick me or be branded a coward (as
usual).
LOL's, the only cowards, I see are all you fat cows dancing naked in the
moonlight
That must be a very advanced case of alcoholism you have, boy. You've
graduated from the usual pink elephants.
Now about these lawsuits you think you can file over words on Usenet...
I have read, and I believe it to be true, that you have been tried and
convicted of sex crimes involving a stolen goat.
If you fail to sue me you'll be publically admitting to those acts.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
