Science > Abortion > Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Flower Power" |
| Date: |
04 Jul 2004 10:05:04 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
"Steenkin Man" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2kra2hF5fprnU1@uni-berlin.de...
What are you relying on, arsehole?
==========================
Tell us how normal it is for boys and men to constantly fantasize and post
about making women suffer and murdering women. Inquiring minds want to
know. Tell us all the serial killers didn't have the same thoughts.....
I'd love to see what your defense of this sociopath will be when he finally
acts on his fantasies and murders a few women. Oh, wait - you'll claim the
"bitches" deserved it - right?
FP..........
.
|
|
| User: "Steenkin Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
04 Jul 2004 11:20:22 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:05:04 -0500, "Flower Pot"
<LiberatedLesbian@This.net> wrote:
Hi ***** Pot
Nice to see that you call us inferior beings boys and men instead of
males now. Welcome to the human race.
Tell us how normal it is for boys and men to constantly fantasize and post
about making women suffer and murdering women.
Oh, we do that all the time. Can't stop it, don'tcha know. We think
about sex every seven seconds (just ask Carol Ann) then we think about
murdering all females every five seconds.
Of course, there's football, cars and horse racing to fit in as well.
We also have to invent, build and deploy (I'm in deploy) all the
technology that keeps you warm and well-fed (ask Parg about well-fed).
It's a man's world, no doubt about it.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Really? Whose inquiring mind?
Tell us all the serial killers didn't have the same thoughts.....
Well, if you've interviewed them...
Funny, I didn't see you as a Jailhouse Jane, sending her damp knickers
to blokes on death row. I thought you were more the
where-the-*****-did-my-life-go-*****-I'm-out-of-drugs-and-grey-haired
type of hippy.
I'd love to see what your defense of this sociopath will be when he finally
acts on his fantasies and murders a few women. Oh, wait - you'll claim the
"bitches" deserved it - right?
Which sociopath would that be? One of your customers?
--
num tibi mentireris?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
04 Jul 2004 11:49:30 PM |
|
|
"Steenkin Man" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2ks38dF5kfe2U1@uni-berlin.de...
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:05:04 -0500, "Flower Pot"
<LiberatedLesbian@This.net> wrote:
Hi ***** Pot
Nice to see that you call us inferior beings boys and men instead of
males now. Welcome to the human race.
Tell us how normal it is for boys and men to constantly fantasize and
post
about making women suffer and murdering women.
Oh, we do that all the time. Can't stop it, don'tcha know. We think
about sex every seven seconds (just ask Carol Ann) then we think about
murdering all females every five seconds.
Of course, there's football, cars and horse racing to fit in as well.
We also have to invent, build and deploy (I'm in deploy) all the
technology that keeps you warm and well-fed (ask Parg about well-fed).
It's a man's world, no doubt about it.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Really? Whose inquiring mind?
Tell us all the serial killers didn't have the same thoughts.....
Well, if you've interviewed them...
Funny, I didn't see you as a Jailhouse Jane, sending her damp knickers
to blokes on death row. I thought you were more the
where-the-*****-did-my-life-go-*****-I'm-out-of-drugs-and-grey-haired
type of hippy.
I'd love to see what your defense of this sociopath will be when he
finally
acts on his fantasies and murders a few women. Oh, wait - you'll claim
the
"bitches" deserved it - right?
Which sociopath would that be? One of your customers?
========================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," - by his own admission. ;-) How did this NG ever get so
full to pizza-faced, lame teenage wankers?
FP.........
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
05 Jul 2004 12:50:46 AM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@This.net> wrote in message
news:yKWdnaJ01f5DQHXdRVn-vA@heartoftn.net...
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man,"
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with scented
soap or something will you...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
05 Jul 2004 07:38:35 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a well known net kook named<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> ejaculated in
message news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84...
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with scented
soap or something will you...
==============================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex. Is it any wonder he
never gets "any?"
He missed mentioning his other favorite topic - Nazis and
Nazi women. LOL!!!!
FP...........
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
05 Jul 2004 09:10:40 PM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@NOSlave.net> wrote in message
news:W6udnaMUXMYTaXTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a well known net kook named<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> ejaculated in
message news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84...
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with
scented
soap or something will you...
==============================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex. Is it any wonder he
never gets "any?"
Why would any man want a stinking *****, that smell like fish......
Fluff Power
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob Claims *Lible* -> Steenkin Man defined - profane anti-choicer |
06 Jul 2004 10:09:27 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in message
news:ASnGc.60720$_5.32618@clgrps13...
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@NOSlave.net> wrote in message
news:W6udnaMUXMYTaXTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a well known net kook named<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> ejaculated in
message news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84...
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with
scented
soap or something will you...
==============================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex. Is it any wonder he
never gets "any?"
Why would any man want a stinking *****, that smell like fish......
Fluff Power
======================
Ah yes,... another mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex and woman's genitals. Is
it any wonder he
never gets "any?"
FP.........
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob Claims *Lible* -> Steenkin Man defined - profane anti-choicer |
07 Jul 2004 11:46:59 AM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@Ladies.net> wrote in message
news:8JCdne7cafvy9HbdRVn-sA@heartoftn.net...
Is
it any wonder she
never gets "any?"
fatcow, never get any
Fat P.........
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob Claims *Lible* -> Steenkin Man defined - profane anti-choicer |
06 Jul 2004 10:24:27 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:09:27 -0500, "Flower Power"
<IndependantWomen@Ladies.net> got double secret probation because:
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in message
news:ASnGc.60720$_5.32618@clgrps13...
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@NOSlave.net> wrote in message
news:W6udnaMUXMYTaXTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a well known net kook named<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> ejaculated in
message news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84...
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with
scented
soap or something will you...
==============================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex. Is it any wonder he
never gets "any?"
Why would any man want a stinking *****, that smell like fish......
Fluff Power
======================
Ah yes,... another mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex and woman's genitals. Is
it any wonder he
never gets "any?"
FP.........
All socmans get some and they get more when they change hands.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
05 Jul 2004 09:16:57 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 02:10:40 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> got double
secret probation because:
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@NOSlave.net> wrote in message
news:W6udnaMUXMYTaXTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a well known net kook named<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> ejaculated in
message news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84...
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with
scented
soap or something will you...
==============================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex. Is it any wonder he
never gets "any?"
Why would any man want a stinking *****, that smell like fish......
So you admit then that you are gay and urine smelling chests like
Blob's are what turn you on?
Fluff Power
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Stinky goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
06 Jul 2004 10:12:46 PM |
|
|
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:vq2ke0ljb4u6h3vflpmbtkjt20ovlfe3c8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 02:10:40 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> got double
secret probation because:
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@NOSlave.net> wrote in message
news:W6udnaMUXMYTaXTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a well known net kook named<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> ejaculated in
message news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84...
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with
scented
soap or something will you...
==============================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex. Is it any wonder
he
never gets "any?"
Why would any man want a stinking *****, that smell like fish......
So you admit then that you are gay and urine smelling chests like
Blob's are what turn you on?
=============================
Stinking Man is totally obsessed with women's genitals and eating fish!
LOL!!!! :-D He's has some serious issues like a few other
anti-choicers/anti-women posters here. And they wonder why they have zero
credibility on Usenet. Stinky must be from the kooks NG.
FP...........
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Stinky goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
06 Jul 2004 10:28:06 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:12:46 -0500, "Flower Power"
<IndependantWomen@Ladies.net> got double secret probation because:
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:vq2ke0ljb4u6h3vflpmbtkjt20ovlfe3c8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 02:10:40 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> got double
secret probation because:
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@NOSlave.net> wrote in message
news:W6udnaMUXMYTaXTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a well known net kook named<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> ejaculated in
message news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84...
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with
scented
soap or something will you...
==============================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex. Is it any wonder
he
never gets "any?"
Why would any man want a stinking *****, that smell like fish......
So you admit then that you are gay and urine smelling chests like
Blob's are what turn you on?
=============================
Stinking Man is totally obsessed with women's genitals and eating fish!
LOL!!!! :-D He's has some serious issues like a few other
anti-choicers/anti-women posters here. And they wonder why they have zero
credibility on Usenet. Stinky must be from the kooks NG.
FP...........
All quite possibly true, but that was Harry Buttwipe.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Stinky goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
07 Jul 2004 11:39:59 AM |
|
|
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:2drme0pa7a2bga6i5as6qcbiodlqv054ld@4ax.com...
Buttwipe.
Ahhh the slave women, wants to wipe my butt again, very good she-goat...keep
up the good work, wiping my ***** that is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Stinky goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
07 Jul 2004 11:52:51 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:39:59 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob>
transparently proposed:
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:2drme0pa7a2bga6i5as6qcbiodlqv054ld@4ax.com...
Buttwipe.
Ahhh the slave women, wants to wipe my butt again, very good she-goat...keep
up the good work, wiping my ***** that is.
See how you fixated on the only anal related word in that poast Harry.
You have to admit you have issues with that part of the anatomy.
'Ratz
--
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Stinky goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
07 Jul 2004 12:02:13 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:52:51 -0700, Aratzio
posted:
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:39:59 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> transparently
proposed:
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:2drme0pa7a2bga6i5as6qcbiodlqv054ld@4ax.com...
Buttwipe.
Ahhh the slave women, wants to wipe my butt again, very good
she-goat...keep up the good work, wiping my ***** that is.
See how you fixated on the only anal related word in that poast Harry. You
have to admit you have issues with that part of the anatomy.
'Ratz
I bet it's not one way.
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
05 Jul 2004 10:03:55 PM |
|
|
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:vq2ke0ljb4u6h3vflpmbtkjt20ovlfe3c8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 02:10:40 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> got double
secret probation because:
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@NOSlave.net> wrote in message
news:W6udnaMUXMYTaXTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a well known net kook named<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> ejaculated in
message news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84...
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with
scented
soap or something will you...
==============================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex. Is it any wonder
he
never gets "any?"
Why would any man want a stinking *****, that smell like fish......
So you admit then that you are gay and urine smelling chests like
Blob's are what turn you on?
Sure if it make you happy, why not, but I'm willing to bet, you still prefer
the smelly fish *****
Fluff Power
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
06 Jul 2004 10:19:33 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a." lonely, friendless and misogynistic<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in message
news:vEoGc.60739$_5.39061@clgrps13...
Sure if it make you happy, why not, but I'm willing to bet, you still
prefer
the smelly fish *****
==============================
Another typical reply from the anti-women/anti-choice side. Aren't they an
intelligent group of people? Note his constant references to sex in one
form or another. What does this tell us? This Hairy one is obsessed with
a woman's genitals and fish. We sure do like having ANTI-CHOICE people
like Hairy here to prove our point. :-)
These misogynists that are not gay have a real problem. Since they can't
turn to men, and they hate women so can't turn to women.... they end up
alone and miserable in their rooms with nothing but their PCs for company -
pathetic.
FP....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
07 Jul 2004 11:39:59 AM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@Ladies.net> wrote in message
news:KuydnWs52c1Q9nbdRVn-hg@heartoftn.net...
Another typical reply from the anti-women/anti-choice side.
That's if you were a women instead of a dog.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
07 Jul 2004 11:49:00 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:39:59 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob>
transparently proposed:
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@Ladies.net> wrote in message
news:KuydnWs52c1Q9nbdRVn-hg@heartoftn.net...
Another typical reply from the anti-women/anti-choice side.
That's if you were a women instead of a dog.
Pithy
--
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steenkin Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
06 Jul 2004 11:11:33 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:19:33 -0500, "Flower Pot"
<IndependantIdiot@Ladies.net> wrote:
"Harry Ballsac..a." lonely, friendless and misogynistic<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in message
news:vEoGc.60739$_5.39061@clgrps13...
Sure if it make you happy, why not, but I'm willing to bet, you still
prefer
the smelly fish *****
==============================
Another typical reply from the anti-women/anti-choice side. Aren't they an
intelligent group of people? Note his constant references to sex in one
form or another. What does this tell us? This Hairy one is obsessed with
a woman's genitals and fish. We sure do like having ANTI-CHOICE people
like Hairy here to prove our point. :-)
These misogynists that are not gay have a real problem.
That's me, ***** Pot!
Since they can't turn to men, and they hate women so can't turn to women.... they end up
alone and miserable in their rooms with nothing but their PCs for company -
That's me! I'm all alone with these computers.
pathetic.
Rescue me, ***** Pot! Rescue me!
But hurry up, you old hag, I finish work at 6am and it's gone five
now. My train goes at 6.28.
--
num tibi mentireris?
.
|
|
|
| User: "catchmerevisited" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
07 Jul 2004 04:32:50 AM |
|
|
in article 2l1bfuF7f4gsU4@uni-berlin.de, Steenkin Man at
wrote on 7/6/04 9:11 PM:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:19:33 -0500, "Flower Pot"
<IndependantIdiot@Ladies.net> wrote:
Since they can't turn to men, and they hate women so can't turn to women....
they end up
alone and miserable in their rooms with nothing but their PCs for company -
That's me! I'm all alone with these computers.
Use Mac's; they're friendlier. ;-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
06 Jul 2004 08:05:00 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 03:03:55 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob>
transparently proposed:
"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:vq2ke0ljb4u6h3vflpmbtkjt20ovlfe3c8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 02:10:40 GMT, "Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> got double
secret probation because:
"Flower Power" <IndependantWomen@NOSlave.net> wrote in message
news:W6udnaMUXMYTaXTd4p2dnA@heartoftn.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a well known net kook named<Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> ejaculated in
message news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84...
Is that fish I smell, you *****.... Please go and wash it out, with
scented
soap or something will you...
==============================
Ah yes,... such a mature, well thought out and sensible reply from the
"Stinking Man," who, as usual is obsessed with sex. Is it any wonder
he
never gets "any?"
Why would any man want a stinking *****, that smell like fish......
So you admit then that you are gay and urine smelling chests like
Blob's are what turn you on?
Sure if it make you happy, why not, but I'm willing to bet, you still prefer
the smelly fish *****
I can see we both chose wisely. So does Blob know you fancy him?
--
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "spooge" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
05 Jul 2004 09:29:08 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
Hop to it.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
05 Jul 2004 10:05:15 PM |
|
|
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When you come into a lot of cash fish lips, call me and I'll sue you...
Until then go blow your pet doggy, he is waiting.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
06 Jul 2004 10:20:52 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in message
news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13...
When you come into a lot of cash fish lips, call me and I'll sue you...
Until then go blow your pet doggy, he is waiting.
===============
This is the intelligence level of the anti-choice people.
FP...........
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "spooge" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 10:54:55 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:LFoGc.60741$_5.36139@clgrps13:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns951DC62C8E336mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:W_5Gc.89777$HS3.33338@edtnps84:
-snip-
Is that <Slap!>
I'm waiting for my lawsuit, girlie-boy.
When <shush>
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 11:23:30 PM |
|
|
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9520D4B3429F4mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
General Libel and Slander Law Questions Just for you "stupid people" on
Slander and "DEFAMATION"
INSULTS
"WHAT ABOUT INSULTS AND EPITHETS? ARE THEY DEFAMATORY?"
Generally, no. Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no real
substance, except to show intense dislike. Oral
1.) WHAT IS "DEFAMATION"?
Defamation, sometimes called "defamation of character", is spoken or written
words that falsely and negatively reflect on a living person's reputation.
If a person or the news media says or writes something about you that is
understood to lower your reputation, or that keeps people from associating
with you, defamation has occurred. Slander and libel are two forms of
defamation.
2.) WHAT IS "SLANDER"?
Slander is a spoken defamation.
3.) WHAT IS "LIBEL"?
Libel is a written defamation. Generally, radio and television broadcasts
that are defamatory are considered to be libel, rather than slander.
4.) CAN I SUE SOMEONE WHO SAYS OR WRITES SOMETHING DEFAMATORY ABOUT ME?
In order to prove defamation, you have to be able to prove that what was
said or written about you was false. If the information is true, or if you
consented to publication of the material, you will not have a case. However,
you may bring an defamatory action if the comments are so reprehensible and
false that they effect your reputation in the community or cast aspersions
on you.
5.) CAN LIBEL SUITS BE BROUGHT BY A PUBLIC FIGURE?
These suits are a bit dicer for the public figure.
A public figure may be an elected or appointed (a politician) or someone who
has stepped into a public controversy (e.g., movie stars and TV stars, star
athletes). Public figures have a "harder road to toll" than the average
person since they must prove that the party defaming them knew the
statements were false, made them with actual malice, or was negligent in
saying or writing them. Proving these elements makes the chance of a
successful lawsuit slim.
6.) WHAT ABOUT INSULTS AND EPITHETS? ARE THEY DEFAMATORY?
Generally, no. Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no real
substance, except to show intense dislike.
7.) DON'T I HAVE A RIGHT TO EXPRESS MY OPINION?
Yes, so long as your statement of opinion is just an opinion, not containing
specific facts that can be proved untrue.
8.) WHAT HAPPENS WITH REPORTERS AND THEIR STATEMENTS? ARE THEY PROTECTED?
Damages can be recovered if the newspaper's story had inaccuracies in the
reporting of statements which hurt the reputation of a person or business.
The newspaper would be held responsible for its story.
9.)ARE THERE DEFENSES TO DEFAMATION?
Establishing the truth is the single most effective defense that can be
offered. If the remark is truthful and it "hurts", is embarrassing, or
subjects you to ridicule, there is little you can do. Unfortunately, unless
the remark is false, you have no recourse.
10.) I RECENTLY REVIEWED MY PERSONNEL WORK FILES AND WAS HORRIFIED TO READ
THAT SOME OF THE STATEMENTS WRITTEN BY MY SUPERVISOR WERE FLAT OUT WRONG.
LIBEL?
If the offending material reflected only opinions, it would not be libelous.
If the material, however, reflected facts, the employer is asking for a
defamation suit, if the facts later are proved untruthful. For example, if
your personnel file contains a negative job performance evaluation, stating
that you are dishonest, not to be trusted with the keys to the cash
register, the employer could be held liable for defamation, if the statement
was false.
11.) WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO A LIBEL CLAIM?
There are three main defenses to a libel claim (other than asserting that it
never happened or that you were never involved):
The first is claiming, and proving, that the statement was privileged (and
thus not public). Only certain professions (doctors, lawyers,
psychologists), or individuals (chiefly your spouse) can maintain that
privilege; and if any non-privileged third party was part of the
communication, the privilege is broken. (Employees of a professional are
only partially covered, to the extent that you needed to use them to contact
the professional. Don't expect to tell your deepest, darkest secret to your
attorney's secretary, and maintain that privilege.)
The second defense is claiming, and proving, that the statement is true, for
"truth is an absolute defense".
The third defense is claiming, and proving, that the statement was an
opinion, not an assertion of a fact. Since this last defense is only as good
as the weakest or worst, but still reasonable, misinterpretation, it's not
one you really want to rely on. There's a world of difference between saying
"I think he's a crook," and "he's a crook". Especially if a third party
might inadvertently leave out the first two words when passing your message
on.
12.) WHAT DAMAGES ARE AVAILABLE FOR SLANDER OR LIBEL?
If you have been defamed you may seek both actual damages, to recover the
harm that you have suffered, and punitive damages to punish the person who
made the remark (and serve as an example to deter others).
If the defamation improperly accused you of a crime or reflected on your
profession, the Court or jury can assess the damages. For other types of
defamation you must prove some actual damage to be able to recover.
13.) FALSELY ACCUSED OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT BY A FORMER SUBORDINATE. THE
ACCUSATIONS SOMEHOW WERE LEAKED TO YOUR FELLOW WORKERS AND NOW, DESPITE
BEING EXONERATED, I AM TREATED WITH DISDAIN BY MY PEERS. DO I HAVE A CASE?
This is a tough one. Who was the responsible party in spreading the
defamatory word around -- the employee who made the accusations against you,
you, or your employer?
You can complain if the responsible party was the employee or employer
because it is illegal to unjustly malign the reputation of another person,
and such conduct may be defamatory against you. If you are the responsible
party, you cannot complain.
14.) WHAT HAPPENS IF SOMEONE SLANDERS OR LIBELS SOMEONE WHO IS DEAD?
While it may be reprehensible to say false things about someone who has
died, in most states it is not legally actionable. No action can be taken on
behalf of a dead person.
15.) CAN I SUE FOR DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS MADE BY A WITNESS UNDER OATH IN A
JUDICIAL PROCEEDING?
Statements in a judicial proceeding are privileged. A judge, juror, lawyers,
witnesses, or other parties are absolutely protected. For example, you are
involved in an employment dispute with your former employer who lets it be
known to everyone that you are a drunk and a thief, knowing that it is
untrue. Your former employer can make this defamatory statement without
being sued by you afterwards.
Also protected are the remarks made by federal or state legislators in
committee hearings or floor debates.
Damages
WHAT DAMAGES ARE AVAILABLE FOR SLANDER OR LIBEL?
If you have been defamed you may seek both actual damages, to recover the
harm that you have suffered, and punitive damages to punish the person who
made the remark (and serve as an example to deter others).
If the defamation improperly accused you of a crime or reflected on your
profession, the Court or jury can assess the damages. For other types of
defamation you must prove some actual damage to be able to recover.
Defenses
ARE THERE DEFENSES TO DEFAMATION?
Establishing the truth is the single most effective defense that can be
offered. If the remark is truthful and it "hurts", is embarrassing, or
subjects you to ridicule, there is little you can do. Unfortunately, unless
the remark is false, you have no recourse.
WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO A LIBEL CLAIM?
There are three main defenses to a libel claim (other than asserting that it
never happened or that you were never involved):
The first is claiming, and proving, that the statement was privileged (and
thus not public). Only certain professions (doctors, lawyers,
psychologists), or individuals (chiefly your spouse) can maintain that
privilege; and if any non-privileged third party was part of the
communication, the privilege is broken. (Employees of a professional are
only partially covered, to the extent that you needed to use them to contact
the professional. Don't expect to tell your deepest, darkest secret to your
attorney's secretary, and maintain that privilege.)
The second defense is claiming, and proving, that the statement is true, for
"truth is an absolute defense".
The third defense is claiming, and proving, that the statement was an
opinion, not an assertion of a fact. Since this last defense is only as good
as the weakest or worst, but still reasonable, misinterpretation, it's not
one you really want to rely on. There's a world of difference between saying
"I think he's a crook," and "he's a crook". Especially if a third party
might inadvertently leave out the first two words when passing your message
on.
E-mail communications
ARE LAWS REGARDING DEFAMATION APPLICABLE TO E-MAIL AND OTHER ON-LINE
ACTIVITIES?
Absolutely! If a person commits libel (false and unprivileged publication or
assertion of a fact, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule,
or which causes him/her to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to
injure him/her in his/her trade or occupation) against you through e-mail or
other on-line activities, the publisher, and any re-publisher, of the
offensive statement can be held accountable for damages. For the defenses
against libel, see our section on Libel .
Passing fraudulent information about can get you into trouble, whether you
try to profit from it or not. Because if the victim is harmed by your
action, you can be held liable for his or her losses. Stock manipulation
schemes are no more legal on the Internet than they were in the mail or over
the telephone.
If you think you've been defrauded by false information passed on by a
computer channel, defamed, or worry about whether you can make an aggressive
advertising claim, it might be worth talking to a lawyer -- remembering
always that prevention is a lot cheaper, and faster, than any cure.
INSULTS
WHAT ABOUT INSULTS AND EPITHETS? ARE THEY DEFAMATORY?
Generally, no. Usually they are seen as outbursts of emotion, with no real
substance, except to show intense dislike.
Oral
CAN I SUE SOMEONE WHO SAYS OR WRITES SOMETHING DEFAMATORY ABOUT ME?
In order to prove defamation, you have to be able to prove that what was
said or written about you was false. If the information is true, or if you
consented to publication of the material, you will not have a case. However,
you may bring an defamatory action if the comments are so reprehensible and
false that they effect your reputation in the community or cast aspersions
on you.
WRITTEN
CAN I SUE SOMEONE WHO SAYS OR WRITES SOMETHING DEFAMATORY ABOUT ME?
In order to prove defamation, you have to be able to prove that what was
said or written about you was false. If the information is true, or if you
consented to publication of the material, you will not have a case. However,
you may bring an defamatory action if the comments are so reprehensible and
false that they effect your reputation in the community or cast aspersions
on you.
DON'T I HAVE A RIGHT TO EXPRESS MY OPINION?
Yes, so long as your statement of opinion is just an opinion, not containing
specific facts that can be proved untrue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "spooge" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 09:24:11 PM |
|
|
"Harry Ballsac..a." <Harry
Ballsac..a.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in
news:65pHc.11101$Rf.8530@edtnps84:
"spooge" <spooge@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9520D4B3429F4mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...
Okay, I'll try typing this slower so you can understand my words:
I a-m s-t-i-l-l w-a-i-t-i-n-g f-o-r m-y l-a-w-s-u-i-t, l-i-a-r b-o-y.
General Libel and Slander Law Questions Just for you "stupid people" on
Slander and "DEFAMATION"
INSULTS
Harry, Harry, Harry. I'm not insulting you, I'm stating that I sincerely
believe that you insert a large size day-glow orange traffic cone up your
rectum every day before you put on your Spiderman Underalls, and as a
result you can't be trusted around children nor large accumulations of
asphalt.
If I was intending to insult you I'd point out that your face resembles a
week old pile of aardvark dung.
You do see the difference, right? I'm purposefully defaming your nym on
Usenet in the first instance, and I'm mocking you in the second.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
08 Jul 2004 11:34:48 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 +0000, Harry
Ballsac..a. posted:
1.) WHAT IS "DEFAMATION"?
Defamation, sometimes called "defamation of character", is spoken or
written words that falsely and negatively reflect on a living person's
reputation.
Hey, nominated CotM:
__
/__\
|--|
_ | |
/ \|--|
| | |\
| | |/ \ _
/| | | |/ \
/ do you |
\ read /
\ middle /
|fingers?|
| |
© copyleft Alcatroll Labs Inc., Usenet Performance Art Producers
GNU Public Licence compliant,
*note Alcatroll Labs Inc. is the satirical name of a non existent
*company. No commercial use intended.
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Ballsac..a. Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 12:02:58 PM |
|
|
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:pan.2004.07.09.04.34.44.407685@hotmail.com...
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 +0000, Harry
Ballsac..a. posted:
1.) WHAT IS "DEFAMATION"?
Defamation, sometimes called "defamation of character", is spoken or
written words that falsely and negatively reflect on a living person's
reputation.
Hey, nominated CotM:
Couldn't back up your claims, so up your sonny jim
__
/__\
|--|
_ | |
/ \|--|
| | |\
| | |/ \ _
/| | | |/ \
/ do you |
\ read /
\ middle /
|fingers?|
| |
© copyleft Alcatroll Labs Inc., Usenet Performance Art Producers
GNU Public Licence compliant,
*note Alcatroll Labs Inc. is the satirical name of a non existent
*company. No commercial use intended.
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Blob goes k00ksuit, Claims *Lible* -> Was: bob defined |
09 Jul 2004 03:24:51 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 17:02:58 +0000, Harry
Ballsac..a. posted:
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:pan.2004.07.09.04.34.44.407685@hotmail.com...
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:23:30 +0000, Harry
Ballsac..a. posted:
1.) WHAT IS "DEFAMATION"?
Defamation, sometimes called "defamation of character", is spoken or
written words that falsely and negatively reflect on a living person's
reputation.
Hey, nominated CotM:
Couldn't back up your claims, so up your sonny jim
First anwser the question: "How can a nym be degamted?".
And don't run cowardly away this time!
__
/__\
|--|
_ | |
/ \|--|
| | |\
| | |/ \ _
/| | | |/ \
/ do you |
\ read /
\ middle /
|fingers?|
| |
| |
© copyleft Alcatroll Labs Inc., Usenet Performance Art Producers GNU
Public Licence compliant,
*note Alcatroll Labs Inc. is the satirical name of a non existent
*company. No commercial use intended.
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net> CEO Alcatroll Labs
Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
