On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 22:10:35 +0100, Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net> got
double secret probation because:

On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:03:14 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:40:42 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> got
double secret probation because:

Steenkin Man wrote:

On 4 Jul 2004 20:26:53 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:40E86330.9040200@hotmail.com:

[...]

"This Bob is a dangerous psychosexual misogynistic and sadistic
sociopath. Just read his posts about women and how he keeps
mentioning killing them, cutting them open, calling them bitches
etc. He has a pathological hatred for all women. It's only a
matter of time before he acts on these violent fantasies. In his
sick mind he's "getting even" with them by killing them and making
them suffer. They've talked to these sadistic men to see how
they think and tick (psychosexual women killers) and Bob sounds
exactly like them. They all hate women, they blame women for all
their woes, most had cruel cold mothers, uncaring or absent
fathers, tortured animals, wet their beds, were social rejects,
almost all were unpopular with women and all had failed to have
any meaningful relationships with women....... it's just a
matter of time before Bob acts...."
-"Mother Flower Power" <LiberatedLadies@Freedom.com>
Message-ID: <OYadnSH5KZGy5H_dRVn-hA@heartoftn.net>

Claptrap.

He could sue her for saying that and sue you for repeating a
libel. Both his parents could sue as well.

Steenkin Man you are a complete idiot.

Compared to you, fuckwit, I'm a beacon of light.

It is a total lible, but on Usenet the value of suing is minimal,
virtually impossible. Could be done just for fun though.

We expect the feminazi turds to post lies about MEN on Usenet. They
are driven crazy because they can't silence MEN and drive us off
like they can on University campuses and at work.

Bob

Please Blob, sue someone for *lible* on USENET.

I refer the honourable fuckwit to the case of Godfrey v Demon.
http://www.nominet.org.uk/ReferenceDocuments/CaseLaw/GodfreyVDemonInter
net.html

BTW, the libel is still at the top of this post. I'm relying on Bob's
goodwill not to prosecute me for repeating it.

What are you relying on, arsehole?

The fact you are both ignorant fuckwits and have not a clue about the
law. That just for starter. Just in case you wish your own chance at
k00ksuit you IGNORANT FUCKWIT MISOGYNISTIC WOMAN RAPING PIG. How is
that? Work for you. Now toddle on off to your local lawyewrs office on
Tuesday and watch him laugh his ***** off at you.

Couple minor simple little problems with your plan. Blob has to prove
who is *Bob*. I can produce hundreds of *Bob* that post on Usenet. Or
did that simple little fact slip through your swiss cheese brain.
Usenet pseudonyms cannot be libeled. Only real people/entities can be
libeled. Second what damages are there to a pseudonym? Third, prove
what was said were lies. Not to get too complex here, since I am
dealing with socman, but what do you plan to use for evidence and
colection of said evidence?

Like I said k00ks and law, always good for a laugh.

Tell us how that would
work? How *you* were libeled? Come on now you said it would be fun,
lets hear about how you would accomplish this *fun*. Especially when
you sue for *lible*

I do love when the k00ks start talking about the law.

'Ratz