On 7 Sep 2006 12:52:45 -0700, yiD <yaffadina2@aol.com> wrote:
flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
On 7-Sep-2006, "yD" <yaffadina2@aol.com> wrote:
flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
On 7-Sep-2006, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
Bob4Health@hotmail.com (Macabee) wrote in
news:1157566637.128877.30520@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:
Nonsense. There is a rich vibrant Muslim community. So much of
the various holy books are symbolic. You're just spouting hatred.
The totalitarian thugs ruling Iran and other like prison states all
claim to be "good Muslims".
The murderous terrorist groups causing grief around the world claim
to be "good Muslims".
Why not take them at their word?
My one thought on the subject of Islam vs. Islamonazis is that there
are MILLIONS of Muslims the world over. If Islam was really like theI
Islamonazis insist it is, then the terrorist problem would be HUNDREDS
of times WORSE.
It's bad enough in England for "thousands" of Muslims to be under some
kind of survellience.
It's a brave new world.
Sigh.
Susan
Sigh, indeed. And in England, some, at least of the July 7th bombers
were second generation English which, I think, shocked a lot of people.
Enoch Powell said in the 70s that the streets would run with blood and
damn if he isn't being proved right!
yiD
That's second generation B'ritish, not English, yiD. A Paki (or a
yiD) can never be "English".
.